Skip to main content

Campylobacter jejuni dsb gene expression is regulated by iron in a Fur-dependent manner and by a translational coupling mechanism

An Erratum to this article was published on 19 April 2012



Many bacterial extracytoplasmic proteins are stabilized by intramolecular disulfide bridges that are formed post-translationally between their cysteine residues. This protein modification plays an important role in bacterial pathogenesis, and is facilitated by the Dsb (disulfide bond) family of the redox proteins. These proteins function in two parallel pathways in the periplasmic space: an oxidation pathway and an isomerization pathway. The Dsb oxidative pathway in Campylobacter jejuni is more complex than the one in the laboratory E. coli K-12 strain.


In the C. jejuni 81-176 genome, the dsb genes of the oxidative pathway are arranged in three transcriptional units: dsbA2-dsbB-astA, dsbA1 and dba-dsbI. Their transcription responds to an environmental stimulus - iron availability - and is regulated in a Fur-dependent manner. Fur involvement in dsb gene regulation was proven by a reporter gene study in a C. jejuni wild type strain and its isogenic fur mutant. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) confirmed that analyzed genes are members of the Fur regulon but each of them is regulated by a disparate mechanism, and both the iron-free and the iron-complexed Fur are able to bind in vitro to the C. jejuni promoter regions. This study led to identification of a new iron- and Fur-regulated promoter that drives dsbA1 gene expression in an indirect way. Moreover, the present work documents that synthesis of DsbI oxidoreductase is controlled by the mechanism of translational coupling. The importance of a secondary dba-dsbI mRNA structure for dsbI mRNA translation was verified by estimating individual dsbI gene expression from its own promoter.


The present work shows that iron concentration is a significant factor in dsb gene transcription. These results support the concept that iron concentration - also through its influence on dsb gene expression - might control the abundance of extracytoplasmic proteins during different stages of infection. Our work further shows that synthesis of the DsbI membrane oxidoreductase is controlled by a translational coupling mechanism. The dba expression is not only essential for the translation of the downstream dsbI gene, but also Dba protein that is produced might regulate the activity and/or stability of DsbI.


Campylobacter jejuni is a human pathogen and the leading cause of acute bacterial gastroenteritis. As a commensal organism for many warm-blooded animals, especially in the gastrointestinal tract of poultry, C jejuni is also isolated from a wide variety of watery environmental sources [1, 2]. Thus, the ability of C. jejuni to sense and respond to diverse environmental stimuli and to adapt gene expression to changes in external conditions is crucial for its pathogenesis, commensalism and survival outside the host organism.

Recent experiments have revealed many changes in the C. jejuni transcriptome and proteome that are driven by environmental stimuli. These include temperature, oxygen tension, iron concentration, sodium deoxycholate concentration and pH of the culture medium [37]. C. jejuni's phase of life - planktonic vs biofilm - also shows a great difference in the microorganism's protein profile [8, 9]. Campylobacter gene expression is coupled to environmental cues mostly by two-component signal transduction systems (TCSTS) [1014]. The activity and the amount of a specific protein can also be affected by posttranslational modifications such as glycosylation, proteolysis and disulfide bond formation. That latter protein modification, which very often influences the tertiary and quaternary structure of virulence determinants, plays an important role in bacterial pathogenesis [15, 16]. In Gram-negative bacteria disulfide bond formation is facilitated by the Dsb (disulfide bond) family of redox proteins, which function in the periplasmic space under oxidizing conditions. In E. coli the disulfide bridge formation system operates in two partially coinciding metabolic pathways: the oxidation (DsbA and DsbB) pathway and the isomerization/reduction (DsbC and DsbD) pathway. The oxidation pathway is responsible for the formation of disulfide bonds in newly synthesized proteins, just after they cross the cytoplasmic membrane. This process occurs in a rather non-selective way. The isomerization/reduction pathway rearranges improperly introduced disulfides [15, 16].

The sequencing of more and more bacterial genomes has revealed that the process of disulfide bond formation in bacteria is extremely diverse, and it has become obvious that E. coli Dsb system cannot be considered a paradigm for Dsb activity [16, 17]. The Dsb oxidative pathway of C. jejuni is much more complex than the oxidative pathway of the laboratory E. coli K-12. Depending on the strain, it is catalyzed by three or four enzymes - two localized in the inner membrane (DsbB and DsbI) and one or two in the periplasm (DsbA1 and DsbA2). DsbA1 and DsbA2 possess classic signal sequences, which potentially ensure their transport through the cytoplasmic membrane into the periplasm. They are both directly responsible for disulfide bond formation. DsbB and DsbI, orthologues of E. coli DsbB, are potentially involved in DsbA1/DsbA2 re-oxidation [18]. C. jejuni genes of the Dsb oxidation pathway are organized in two clusters located at different chromosomal loci: dsbA2-dsbB-astA-dsbA1 and dba-dsbI. AstA (arylsulfatase), encoded by the gene located in the first cluster, transfers arylsulfate groups between aromatic substrates in an adenosine 3'-phosphate-5'phosphosulfate (PAPS)-independent manner, at least in an E. coli strain [1921], and is a substrate for the Dsb oxidative pathway. Based on specificity toward the donor aromatic substrate, arylsulfatases are classified as PAPS-dependent or PAPS-independent enzymes. The mode of C. jejuni AstA action remains uncharacterized. The dba gene encodes a potential protein of unknown function. Except for dsbA2, C. jejuni dsb genes are highly conserved within the species. Only dsbA2 is variable among strains [15].

An active Dsb system is required for intestinal colonization by Campylobacter, as shown in a chicken infection model. Additionally, C. jejuni strain 81-176 with a mutated dsbB or dsbI gene showed reduced invasion/intracellular survival ability in T84 cells. These data indicate that some targets of the Dsb system are involved in crucial processes of Campylobacter pathogenicity and commensalism [22].

The goal of this work was to analyze C. jejuni dsb oxidative gene expression by characterizing its transcriptional units, and identify control mechanisms and environmental regulatory factors that facilitate the pathogen's adaptation to varying living conditions. We show that the dsb genes are arranged in three operons in the genome, and that expression of those operons responds to an environmental stimulus - iron availability. Although transcription of dsbB and dsbI are both altered by iron concentration with Fur protein engagement, they are regulated differently. Thus, by changing Dsb protein abundance, the pathogen can regulate the amounts of many extracytoplasmic virulence factors that are substrates of the Dsb system, depending on the environmental conditions. Additionally, results show that synthesis of DsbI oxidoreductase is strongly controlled by the mechanism of translational coupling.


Bacterial strains, plasmids, media and growth conditions

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. C. jejuni strain 81-176 [23], and 480 [24] were grown under microaerobic conditions at 37°C in Mueller Hinton (MH) broth, on MH agar or Blood Agar Base No. 2 (BA) containing 5% horse blood. E. coli strains were grown at 37°C in Luria Bertani (LB) broth or on LB agar. When appropriate, the media were supplemented with antibiotics [Campylobacter Selective Supplement (Oxoid), ampicillin (100 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (15 μg/ml), kanamycin (30 μg/ml) or tetracycline (10 μg/ml)], iron sulfate Fe2(SO4)3 (40 μM - final concentration in all experimets) or the iron chelator deferoxamine mesylate (20 μM - final concentration in all experimets), X-Gal (13 mg/ml) and/or IPTG (3 mg/ml) in DMF (dimethyl-formamide).

Table 1 Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

As previously reported [6], growth of the C. jejuni NCTC 11168 was slower in the presence of deferoxamine mesylate (iron-restricted conditions) than in the presence of iron sulfate (iron-rich conditions). This was also observed for C. jejuni 81-176, so in iron-restricted conditions the strain was cultivated 5-7 hours longer than in iron-sufficient or iron-rich conditions, till the culture reached OD600 of about 0.4-0.6. We also noted that growth of the fur::cat mutated C. jejuni strains was markedly slower in iron-rich conditions than that of the wild type strain, but it was not slower in iron-restricted conditions. A similar inhibitory effect of iron chelation on the growth of C. jejuni 11168 was previously reported by van Vliet [6, 25].

General DNA procedures

Standard procedures for plasmid DNA isolation and DNA analysis were carried out as described by Sambrook and Russel [26] or were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (A&A Biotechnology). Synthetic primers synthesis (sequences given in Table 2) and DNA sequencing were performed in the DNA Sequencing and Oligonucleotide Synthesis Laboratory at the Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences.

Table 2 Oligonucleotides used in the present study

All vectors containing transcriptional fusions of putative dsb gene promoter regions with a promotorless lacZ gene were constructed using the pMW10 E. coli/C. jejuni shuttle vector. DNA fragments were amplified from C. jejuni 81-176 chromosomal DNA with appropriate pairs of primers (listed in Table 2). Next, PCR products were cloned in the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega), excised by restriction enzymes and subsequently cloned into pMW10, forming transcriptional fusions with the downstream promoterless lacZ reporter gene. Correct construction of the resulting shuttle plasmids was confirmed by restriction analysis and sequencing. All recombinant plasmids, as well as the empty pMW10, were introduced into C. jejuni 480 cells by electroporation.

Construction of a pUWM1072 plasmid containing dsbI without dba under its native promoter was achieved by PCR-amplification of the 520 bp chromosomal DNA fragments containing the dba-dsbI promoter sequences (primer pair Cj19LX-2 - Cj18Nde-Rev) and cloning it into pBluescript II SK (Stratagene), using XbaI/PstI restriction enzymes. Subsequently the dsbI coding sequence (1792 bp) was PCR-amplified using the Cj17Nde - Cj16RS primer pair, cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega) and finally, using NdeI/SalI restriction enzymes, transferred into pUWM1072 in the native orientation, generating the plasmid pUWM1100. The whole insert (2316 bp) was then cloned into a shuttle E. coli/C. jejuni vector pRY107 [27] using SalI/XbaI restriction enzymes. The resulting, plasmid pUWM1103, whose correct construction was verified by sequencing, was used for complementation assays in C. jejuni Δdba-dsbI::cat mutant cells.

Point mutations were generated using a Quick-Change site-directed mutagenesis kit, following the supplier's recommendations (Stratagene). To construct a dba gene with point mutations, the pUWM456 plasmid, containing the C. jejuni dba-dsbI genes, was used as a template for PCR-mediated mutagenesis. Point mutations M1R and L29stop (replacing a Leu codon with amber stop codon) were introduced using the respective pairs of primers: Cj18M1R - Cj18M1Rc and Cj18L29 - Cj18L29c. The resulting plasmids were introduced into E. coli cells by transformation and presence of desired mutations was verified by DNA sequencing. DNA fragments containing the C. jejuni dba-dsbI operon (with or without a point mutation) were then digested and inserted into the pRY107 shuttle vector. The resulting plasmids were named pUWM769 (containing wt dba-dsbI), pUWM811 (dba: M1R, wt dsbI) and pUWM812 (dba: L29stop, wt dsbI). These plasmids were subsequently introduced into C. jejuni 81-176 AL1 (dsbI::cat) and C. jejuni 81-176 AG6 (Δdba-dsbI::cat) knock-out cells by conjugation [28].

Construction of bacterial mutant strains

To inactivate dba and dsbI genes, three recombinant plasmids were constructed, based on pBluescript II KS (Stratagene) and pGEM-T Easy (Promega) vectors, which are suicide plasmids in C. jejuni cells. A. van Vliet kindly furnished the fourth suicide plasmid, pAV80, which was previously used for C. jejuni NCTC11168 fur inactivation [25]. Correct construction of all the plasmids was confirmed by restriction analysis and sequencing.

The plasmid for C. jejuni dba mutagenesis was generated by PCR-amplification of two C. jejuni 81-176 DNA fragments (600 bp and 580 bp long) that contained dba gene fragments with their adjacent regions with primer pairs: Cj19LX-2 - Cj18RM and Cj18LM - Cj17RM. Next they were cloned in native orientation in pBluescript II KS (Statagene). Using BamHI restrictase, the kanamycin resistance cassette (the 1.4 kb aphA-3 gene excised from pBF14) was inserted between the cloned dba arms in the same transcriptional orientation, generating the suicide plasmid pUWM622.

To obtain the construct for C. jejuni dsbI mutagenesis the 1.5 kb DNA fragment containing the dsbI gene was PCR-amplified from the C. jejuni 81-176 chromosome using primer pair: Cj17LSal - Cj17RBgl and was cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega). Subsequently, the internal 300 bp EcoRV-EcoRV region of dsbI was replaced by a SmaI-digested chloramphenicol resistance cassette (the 0.8 kb cat gene excised from pRY109) [27] inserted in the same transcriptional orientation as the dsbI gene, generating the suicide plasmid pUWM713.

To obtain the construct for C. jejuni dba-dsbI mutagenesis, the 410 bp and 380 bp DNA fragments, containing dba upstream and dsbI downstream regions were PCR-amplified from the C. jejuni 81-176 chromosome using primer pairs: Cj19LX-2 - Cjj46mwR and Cjj43mwL - Cjj43Eco. These fragments were directly digested with BamHI restrictase, ligated in a native orientation and used as a template for a subsequent PCR reaction with the external primer pair: Cj19LX-2 - Cjj43Eco. This PCR product was cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega) and the chloramphenicol resistance cassette (the 0.8 kb cat gene excised from pRY109) was inserted in the same transcriptional orientation as dba-dsbI operon at the BamHI site between the C. jejuni DNA fragments, generating suicide plasmid pUWM866.

Gene versions inactivated by insertion of a resistance cassette were introduced into the C. jejuni 81-176 or 480 chromosome by the allele exchange method as described by Wassenaar et al. [24]. Construction of the C. jejuni 480 fur::cat mutant was achieved by natural transformation using C. jejuni 81-176 fur::cat chromosomal DNA. It should be pointed out that C. jejuni 480 was previously described as incapable of accepting chromosomal DNA by natural transformation [24]. Such inconsistency of experimental data might be due to different chromosomal DNA used for natural transformation (C. jejuni 81116 vs C. jejuni 81-176). The mutant strains were obtained by two- or tri-parental mating experiments performed as described by Labigne-Roussel et al. [29] and Davis et al. [30]. The constructed mutants were named AG1 (C. jejuni 81-176 dba::aphA-3), AL1 (C. jejuni 81-176 dsbI::cat), AL4 (C. jejuni 480 dsbI::cat), AG6 (C. jejuni 81-176 Δdba-dsbI::cat), AG11 (C. jejuni 81-176 fur::cat), and AG15 (C. jejuni 480 fur::cat). They demonstrated normal colony morphology and all but two had normal growth rates when cultured on BA plates. Only the C. jejuni 81-176 fur::cat and C. jejuni 480 fur::cat exhibited slower growth, an observation consistent with other studies on fur mutants [25]. Disruption of each gene as a result of double cross-over recombination was verified by PCR with appropriate pairs of primers flanking the insertion site (Table 2). The loss of DsbI synthesis in the constructed mutants was verified by Western blotting of whole-cell protein extracts against specific rabbit polyclonal anti-rDsbI antibodies.

Protein manipulation, and β-galactosidase and arylsulfate sulfotransferase (AstA) assays

Preparation of C. jejuni protein extracts, SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) and blotting procedures were performed by standard techniques [26].

To obtain recombinant His6-DsbI protein, the 1100 bp DNA fragment containing the coding sequence for the predicted periplasmic DsbI C-region was PCR-amplified from the C. jejuni 81-176 chromosome using a primer pair: Cj17WDBam-up - Cj17WDBam-low. This fragment was cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector and then, using BamHI restriction enzyme, into expression vector pET28a (Novagen) to generate plasmid pUWM657, whose correct construction was verified by restriction analysis and sequencing. Cytoplasm-located soluble fusion protein His6-DsbI purified from the E. coli Rosetta (DE3) LacIq strain by affinity chromatography was used for rabbit immunization (Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland). The anti-His6-DsbI (anti-rDsbI) serum obtained was highly specific and recognized native DsbI, as verified by Western blot experiments carried out with protein extracts from C. jejuni wild type and a dsbI mutant strain (data not shown).

To obtain recombinant Fur-His6 protein, the DNA fragment containing the entire fur coding region was PCR-amplified from the C. jejuni 81-176 chromosome with primer pair CjFurNcI - CjFurXhI, and then cloned, using NcoI/XhoI restriction enzymes, into pET24d (Novagen). This generated pUWM1098, carrying a fur-his 6 translational fusion. This plasmid was then transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells. Recombinant Fur-His6 protein was overproduced by addition of 1mM IPTG to the bacterial culture at exponential growth phase and purified under native conditions by affinity chromatography.

β-galactosidase activity assays in C. jejuni cell extracts were performed three times (each time three independent samples were taken for each strain), as described by Miller [31].

C. jejuni transformants grown overnight on BA medium were harvested and resuspended in LB medium to achieve comparable cell densities (OD600 approx. 0.6). Fresh MH liquid medium (MH supplemented with iron sulfate - iron-rich conditions, MH itself - iron-sufficient and MH with iron chelated by addition of deferoxamine mesylate - iron-restricted conditions) was inoculated with C. jejuni (1:10) and incubated overnight (15-22 h depending on the medium) till the culture reached OD600 of about 0.4-0.6. Since Wright et al. documented that C jejuni exhibits a dynamic stationary phase, characterized by switches in motility, substrate utilization and metabolite production accompanied by concurrent changes in gene expression, exponential phase cultures were used in this experiment to eliminate any stationary phase-dependent physiological switching of gene expression levels [32].

Quantitative assays for AstA arylsulfatase activity were performed three times (each time three independent samples were taken for each strain), using the method described by Hendrixson et al. with one difference: the C. jejuni 81-176 strain was cultivated on MH liquid medium under high- or low-iron conditions [33] (approx. 17 h on MH medium under high iron condition and approx. 22 h on MH medium under low-iron condition). For each experiment, bacterial cultures of the same OD (OD600 ~ 0.6-0.7) were used.

RNA analysis

Total RNAs were extracted from C. jejuni overnight BA culture using the standard TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen). RNA samples were treated with DNaseI to eliminate contaminating DNA and quantified by measurements of OD260, RNA was reverse transcribed using Superscript II enzyme (Invitrogen) and RT-primer (Table 2): Cj-RT complementary to the dsbI-internal fragment, or KM-R1, complementary to the kanamycin-resistance cassette. The RT primer was annealed stepwise before adding the reverse transcriptase. The enzyme was finally inactivated by incubation at 70°C for 15 min. A control reaction without reverse transcriptase was used to determine RNA template purity from DNA. PCR reactions (with pairs of primers: Cj17Nde - Cj17RM or KM-L1 - KM-R1) performed on cDNA were carried out in the presence of 2 mM MgCl2 using the following protocol: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; then 30 cycles of: 30 s denaturation at 94°C, 30 s annealing at 50-60°C, 30-180 s elongation at 72°C and 10 min terminal elongation at 72°C. Resulting PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel.

RNA secondary structure was predicted by calculating a 100% consensus among different methods (Afold, PknotsRG, RNAfold, Contrafold, and RNAsubopt) run via the metaserver available at

Gel mobility shift assay

The promoter regions upstream of the dba-dsbI and dsbA2-dsbB-astA operons (~180 bp and ~330 bp, respectively) and the dsbA1 gene (~300 bp) as well as the CJJ81176_1600 - chuA intergenic spacer region (~220 bp) which contains two Fur boxes (positive control) were PCR-amplified from C. jejuni 81-176 chromosomal DNA, using the following primer pairs: DIG_Cjj45 - Cjj46, DIG_dsbA2X - Cjj880, DIG_dsbA1 - Cjj882 and DIG_chuF - EMSAchuR. Primers: DIG_Cjj45, DIG_dsbA2X, DIG_dsbA1 and DIG_chuF were digoxigenin labelled (Metabion). Approximately 28 fmol of each DIG-labelled DNA fragment was incubated with 0, 333, 1000 or 3333 nM of purified Fur-His protein for 20 min. at room temperature and subsequently for 5 min. at 37°C in a 20 μl volume of binding buffer routinely used for the Fur-binding assay (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 1 mM MgCl2 ,0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM KCl, 100 μM MnCl2, 1 μg poly (dI-dC), 50 μg bovine serum albumin and 5% glycerol). In addition, dsbA2 and dsbA1 promoter regions were incubated with Fur-His protein in binding buffer without Mn2+. As negative controls each Dig-labelled DNA fragment was incubated with an unrelated protein (purified H. pylori HP0377- His6). Control reactions were performed using competitor DNA - unlabeled promoter DNA region. Samples were run on a 5% non-denaturing Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gel at 4°C. Then DNA was transferred to nylon membranes (Roche) and UV cross-linked. Labelled DNA was detected with anti-DIG antibody using a standard DIG detection protocol (Roche).


In silico analysis of C. jejuni 81-176 dsbgene clusters

C. jejuni 81-176 dsbA2-dsbB-astA-dsbA1 genes (cjj81176_0880-0883) have the same orientation in the chromosome (Figure 1A) and are separated by short intergenic regions - 11 bp, 87 bp, and 85 bp, respectively. Thus, they potentially might be co-transcribed. In silico analysis of the C. jejuni dsbA2-dsbB-astA-dsbA1 cluster revealed the presence of a potential RBS as well as a complete promoter nucleotide sequence upstream of dsbA2, located within the 627 bp intergenic xerD-dsbA2 region [34]. As this DNA fragment consists of -35, -16 and -10 regions (characteristic for the σ70 binding sequence), it can be recognized by Campylobacter RNAP containing the main sigma factor. Directly upstream of dsbB there is a potential additional RBS sequence but none of the promoter regions were found, suggesting dsbA2-dsbB co-transcription. Upstream of astA and dsbA1 there are putative RBS sequences and incomplete promoter nucleotide sequences, suggesting that astA and dsbA1 might be transcribed separately from dsbA2 and dsbB.

Figure 1
figure 1

Organization of dsb genes in the C. jejuni 81-76 chromosome and constructs prepared for dsb transcription studies; the dsbA2-dsbB-astA-dsbA1 gene set (A), the dba-dsbI gene set (B). Hazy grey boxes stand for C. jejuni genes (C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and 81-176 gene numbering is given above the boxes, below them the studied gene names are given). Black boxes stand for the C. jejuni 81-176 DNA fragments cloned in the transcriptional fusions with the promoterless lacZ gene, displayed by the light grey boxes. The longest transcriptional fusion could not be obtained. Sign β-gal +/- at the right side of the plasmid name stands for presence/absence of β-galactosidase activity conferred by the appropriate construct for the transformant cells.

C. jejuni 81-176 dba (cjj81176_0045c) and dsbI (cjj81176_0044c) have the same orientation in the chromosome (Figure 1B) and their coding sequences are separated by a short intergenic region of 11 bp. An initial RT-PCR experiment carried out on the total C. jejuni RNA documented dba-dsbI co-transcription in vitro and localization of their promoter within 493 bp DNA upstream of the dba translation start codon [18].

Transcriptional analysis of two dsbgene clusters

The lacZ reporter gene system was used to determine the dsb gene expression and regulation. Two sets of dsb-lacZ transcriptional fusions were designed based on a promotorless lacZ gene in the shuttle vector pMW10 [34]. The first one comprised of seven plasmids (pUWM792, pUWM795, pUWM803, pUWM832, pUWM833, pUWM834 and pUWM864) employed to study dsbA2/dsbB/astA/dsbA1 expression. The other consisted of three plasmids (pUMM827, pUWM828 and pUWM858) generated to analyze dba/dsbI expression. Details of the recombinant plasmid structures are shown in Figure 1. We successfully prepared all but one of the planned transcriptional fusions - we failed at constructing the longest fusion presented in Figure 1.

β-galactosidase assays indicated that the fusions present in pUWM833, pUWM834 and pUWM858 were not expressed in C. jejuni cells. This documented that the analyzed genes form two polycistronic operons (dsbA2-dsbB-astA and dba-dsbI) and only dsbA1 is independently transcribed. The level of β-galactosidase provided by the dsbA1 promoter was approximately ten times higher than that conferred by the two other promoters that were analyzed (contained in pUWM803 and pUWM827). Thus, three promoters of various strengths and responsible for C. jejuni dsb gene expression were identified: P dbadsbI , P dsbA2dsbBastA and P dsbA1 .

Influence of environmental stimuli on dsbgene expression

We subsequently tested whether gene expression driven by P dsbA2dsbBastA , P dsbA1 and P dbadsbI (C. jejuni 480 strains harbouring pUWM803, pUWM864 or pUWM827) responds to environmental stimuli. While there were no significant differences in β-galactosidase activity between cells grown at various temperatures (37°C and 42°C) (Figure 2A) or between cells grown in solid and liquid medium (MH broth and MH solidified by agar addition) (data not shown), transcription from each of the analyzed promoters was iron-regulated (Figure 2B). For cells grown in iron-restricted conditions, P dsbA2dsbBastA activity was 10 times lower, P dsbA1 activity was about 30% lower, and P dbadsbI activity was four times higher, compared to cells grown under iron-sufficient/iron-rich conditions.

Figure 2
figure 2

Transcription levels of C. jejuni 81-76 dsb genes (measured by β-galactosidase activity assays) in the wild type strain (A and B) and fur::cat mutant (C) under different environmental conditions. Each experiment was repeated three times, and each time three independent samples were taken for each strain (giving 9 independent measurements for each strain). Statistical significance was calculated using t-Student test for comparison of independent groups (GraphPad Prism). The wild type strain C. jejuni 480 carrying an empty vector pMW10 was used as a control.

Statistical p values:

For wild type C. jejuni 480 strain:

P dba-dsbI temp. 37°C vs 42°C: p = 0,0001(*).

P dsbA2-dsbB-astA temp. 37°C vs 42°C: p = 0,2020.

P dsbA1 temp. 37°C vs 42°C: p = 0,1031.

P dba-dsbI MH+Fe vs MH: p = 0,0576.

P dba-dsbI MH-Fe vs MH: p < 0,0001(*).

P dsbA1-dsbB-astA MH+Fe vs MH: p = 0,0007(*).

P dsbA1-dsbB-astA MH-Fe vs MH: p < 0,0001(*).

P dsbA1 MH+Fe vs MH: p = 0,2569.

P dsbA1 MH-Fe vs MH: p < 0,0001(*).

For mutant C. jejuni 480 fur::cat strain:

P dba-dsbI MH+Fe vs MH: p = 0,3683.

P dba-dsbI MH-Fe vs MH: p = 0,6796.

P dsbA1-dsbB-astA MH+Fe vs MH: p = 0,3164.

P dsbA1-dsbB-astA MH-Fe vs MH: p = 0,0577.

P dsbA1 MH+Fe vs MH: p = 0,5228.

P dsbA1 MH-Fe vs MH: p = 0,2388.

P values of P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant; they are marked with (*).

Iron-regulated expression of many Gram-negative bacterial genes is mediated by the ferric uptake regulator (Fur) [35, 36]. Classically, the Fur protein first binds to its co-repressor Fe2+ , and then binds to the conserved DNA sequence (Fur-box) of the regulated promoter, repressing its transcription. However, transcriptomic analyses documented that apo-Fur (without complexed co-repressor) can also influence gene transcription in response to iron concentration [6, 3638].

We therefore decided to evaluate the regulatory function of the Fur protein on dsb gene expression. For this purpose a C. jejuni 480 fur isogenic mutant was constructed. Then, recombinant plasmids containing dsb promoter-lacZ fussions (pUWM803, pUWM864 and pUWM827) were introduced into the C. jejuni 480 fur::cat mutant by electroporation. The results of β-galactosidase assays performed on the constructed strains proved Fur involvement in iron-dependent regulation of the three analyzed dsb gene promoters (Figure 2C). β-galactosidase activity conferred by the pUWM827 fusion increased under iron-sufficient/rich conditions in the fur mutant as compared to the wild-type strain, suggesting that inactivation of fur results in derepression of P dbadsbI . In contrast, β-galactosidase activities of the pUWM803 and pUWM864 fusions increased under iron starvation in the fur mutant compared to the wild-type strain. This indicates that low level of iron leads to Fur-mediated repression of the P dsbA2dsbBastA and P dsbA1 promoters, since repression was abolished in the fur mutated strain. C. jejuni 480 strain containing pUWM471, which harbors cjaA gene promoter fused to a promotorless lacZ gene, was employed as a control in all experiments analyzing the influence of Fur and iron on dsb gene expression. There were no significant differences in β-galactosidase activity between wild type cells harbouring pUWM471 grown at various iron concentrations as well as between wt and fur mutated cells containing pUWM471. In every case high β-galactosidase levels (about 2000 Miller units) were observed, which is consistent with previously published data that ranked the cjaA promoter as one of the the strongest Campylobacter spp. promoters so far described [39].

Inspection of the nucleotide sequences located upstream of the dba translation initiation codon did not reveal the presence of an exact C. jejuni Fur-binding site sequence motif [40]. So far, a potential Fur binding site for promoters positively regulated by iron concentration in a Fur- dependent manner has not been determined. Therefore, we used EMSA to gain insight into the mechanism by which P dbadsbI , P dsbA2dsbBastA and P dsbA1 are regulated by Fur. To achieve this goal, various primers were designed to amplify a 174 - 299 bp DNA fragment upstream from the translational start site of each tested operon. The promoter region of the chuA gene, which contains the Fur-binding motif and is strongly repressed by iron-complexed Fur, was used as a control [6, 40]. Mn2+ ions were used in the EMSA in place of Fe2+ due to their greater redox stability. It was demonstrated that the Fur-His6 was able to bind in vitro to the DNA region upstream of the dba-dsbI operon only when the regulatory protein was complexed with Mn2+, which indicated, in accordance with previously presented data, that this operon is repressed by the iron-complexed form of Fur (Figure 3E). This promoter region interacts with Fur complexed with Mn2+ as much as the chuA promoter (Figure 3G). In contrast, the upstream DNA region of the dsbA1 gene did not bind Fur, regardless of the presence of Mn2+ in the reaction buffer. This suggested an indirect method of regulation (Figure 3, panel C and D). In the case of the dsbA2-dsbB-astA promoter region, Fur protein bound DNA in the absence of Mn2+ acted as a repressor (Figure 3B), supporting the results obtained in the β-galactosidase assays. Fur-His6 complexed with Mn2+ was also able to bind to this DNA fragment but only under conditions of high protein concentration. The formation of DNA/Fur complexes specific for the dsbA2-dsbB-astA promoter region was efficiently inhibited by adding unlabelled DNA containing the same DNA fragment.

Figure 3
figure 3

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays of chuA, dba-dsbI, dsbA2 and dsbA1 promoter regions bound by CjFur-His 6 . 28 fmol of Dig-labelled PCR amplified DNA fragments: dsbA2 (333 bp - panel A and B), dsbA1 (299 bp- panel C and D), dba-dsbI (174 bp - panel E and F) and chuA (216 bp- panel G and H) were incubated with 0, 333, 1000 or 3333 nM of purified Fur protein. The concentration of CjFur-His6 used in the reactions is indicated above the lanes. Binding buffer used in four EMSA studies (panels B, D, F, H) does not contain Mn2+. Panel I presents competition gel mobility shift assay which was performed by incubation of 3333 nmol Fur-His protein with 28 fmol of the labelled promoter region upstream of dsbA2-dsbB-astA operon (dsbA2) and various concentrations of the unlabelled promoter region upstream of dsbA2-dsbB-astA operon (dsbA2*)

To check whether the abundance/activity of Dsb-dependent proteins is conditioned by iron concentration, we compared the arylsulfate sulfotransferase (AstA) activity in C. jejuni 81-176 wt cells grown under iron-restricted to iron-sufficient/iron-rich conditions. As mentioned before, arylsulfatase is a periplasmic direct substrate of the Dsb oxidative pathway [4143]. This experiment confirmed the dependence of AstA activity on iron concentration. AstA activity of C. jejuni 81-176 wt grown under iron-restricted conditions reached 75-80% of activity observed for the same strain grown under iron-rich condition (Additional file 1).

C. jejuni dba-dsbItranslational coupling

Previously performed in vitro transcription/translation coupled assays suggested that C. jejuni Dba may influence DsbI synthesis and/or stability [18]. To reveal details of dba-dsbI operon expression we examined whether dba/Dba was required for in vivo synthesis of DsbI in E. coli cells. It was demonstrated that in E. coli, DsbI underwent partial degradation (for details see Additional file 2 and 3). This result was in agreement with those derived from previous in vitro experiments. It is noteworthy that in C. jejuni cells, DsbI is produced in two forms as a result of posttranslational modification by glycan binding (for details see Additional file 2 and 4).

Additionally a C. jejuni 81-176 isogenic dba mutant was constructed by inserting the kanamycin resistance cassette in the same orientation as dba coding sequence. This insertion should not alter the downstream dsbI transcription. Nevertheless, inactivation of C. jejuni dba resulted in the absence of DsbI, and subsequent RT-PCR experiments, conducted for four independently isolated transformants, also documented the absence of dsbI transcript in dba mutated cells (data not shown). To further examine the role of dba expression in DsbI synthesis, a double mutant strain - C. jejuni Δdba-dsbI::cat (AG6) - was constructed. Thereafter three recombinant shuttle plasmids, pUWM769 (containing the wild type C. jejuni dba-dsbI operon), pUWM811 and pUWM812 (containing point mutated dba - M1R or dba: L29stop, respectively, and wild type dsbI) were introduced into mutant cells. Transformant cells were screened for DsbI synthesis by Western blot analysis with specific rabbit anti-rDsbI serum and additionally by RT-PCR for the presence of dsbI transcript. Introduction of pUWM769 into C. jejuni 81-176 AG6 (Δdba-dsbI::cat), cells resulted in restoration of DsbI production in a higher amount compared to the wild type strain (Figure 4, lane 6), due to plasmid-encoded dba-dsbI gene expression. When dba translation was completely aborted (C. jejuni AG6 carrying pUWM811) and when the truncated 28 aa Dba was produced (C. jejuni AG6/pUWM812), DsbI was not synthesized at all (Figure 4, lane 4 and 5, respectively). RT-PCR experiments proved that point mutations in dba did not influence dsbI transcription, as comparable amounts of dsbI mRNA were detected in all but one (AG6) of the strains (Figure 5, lanes: 9, 11-13). Comparable results were obtained for series of C. jejuni dsbI::cat strains carrying pUWM769, pUWM811 and pUWM812 plasmids (data not shown), suggesting that intact, chromosomally-encoded Dba cannot act in-trans to ensure dsbI mRNA translation.

Figure 4
figure 4

Translational coupling of C. jejuni dba - dsbI. Western blot (anti-rDsbI) analysis of C. jejuni protein extracts separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. Relative positions of molecular weight markers (lane 1) are listed on the left (in kilodaltons). Lanes 2-6 contain 15 μg of total proteins from: C. jejuni 81-176 wt (2), C. jejuni 81-176 AG6 (dba-dsbI::cat) (3), AG6/pUWM811 (4), AG6/pUWM812 (5) and AG6/pUWM769 (6)

Figure 5
figure 5

Analysis of C. jejuni dsbI transcription from a dba-dsbI operon containing wild type or point mutated dba. RT-PCR analysis of dsbI (and aphA-3) transcription in C. jejuni wild type and mutant cells. Equal amounts of mRNAs isolated from C. jejuni cells were reverse-transcribed using primer KM-R1 or Cj-RT and resulting cDNA was PCR-amplified with primer pairs KM-L1 - KM-R1 (lanes 1-7) or CjNde - Cj17RM (lanes 8-14), respectively. Relative positions of DNA molecular length markers (lanes 1, 8) are listed on the left (in base pairs). Lanes 2-6 and 9-13 contain PCR products amplified on cDNAs for C. jejuni 81-176 wt (2, 9), AG6 (dba-dsbI::cat) (3, 10), AG6/pUWM811 (4, 11), AG6/pUWM812 (5, 12), AG6/pUWM769 (6, 13); lanes 7 and 14 contain PCR products amplified on RNA for AG6/pUWM769 (after DNase treatment). White arrows indicate products of expected size.

To further address the role of Dba in dsbI expression the recombinant plasmid lacking the dba gene but containing the dsbI gene transcribed from own promoter was constructed and introduced into the C. jejuni 81-176 Δdba-dsbI::cat mutant. The C. jejuni 81-176 Δdba-dsbI::cat, harbouring pUWM769 was employed as a control. Western experiments showed that an individual expression of the dsbI gene from own promoter results in DsbI production (Figure 6, lane 2), underlining once more the importance of mRNA secondary structure for the dsbI mRNA translation.

Figure 6
figure 6

Expression of dsbI from own promoter in C. jejuni cells. Western blot (anti-rDsbI) analysis of C. jejuni protein extracts separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. Relative positions of molecular weight markers (lane 1) are listed on the left (in kilodaltons). Lanes 2-4 contain 15 μg of total proteins from: C. jejuni 81-176 AG6 (Δdba-dsbI)/pUWM1103 (2), AG6 (3) and C. jejuni 81-176 wt (4)


The best characterized Dsb oxidative system, that of E. coli K-12, consists of two oxidoreductases, periplasmic DsbA and inner membrane DsbB, that are involved in disulfide bond formation de novo in the bacterial periplasm. Genes encoding these proteins are located in different chromosomal sites and are transcribed as monocistronic units.

The Campylobacter jejuni Dsb oxidative pathway is more complex. In the present study we initiated analysis of C. jejuni dsb gene organization and regulation. Our results document organization of these genes in two operons, one comprised of dba and dsbI, and another of dsbA2, dsbB and astA. The dsbA1 gene constitutes a separate monocistronic transcriptional unit. Predictions based on in silico analysis by Petersen et al. [44] of the C. jejuni NCTC 11168 genome nucleotide sequence stated that the dba and dsbI genes are cotranscribed. They also indicated that cj0864 (a truncated version of dsbA2) and cj0865 (dsbB) potentially form an operon. The first T base of the TATA box was predicted to be located 199 bp upstream from the ATG start codon for the dba-dsbI operon and 66 bp from the ATG start codon for the dsbA2-dsbB-astA operon [44].

Global comparative C. jejuni transcriptome or proteome analysis revealed that transcription levels of dsbA2, dsbB and astA increase in strains isolated from a chicken cecum compared with strains grown in vitro [5] and they are down-regulated under iron-restricted conditions in vitro [6]. Stinzi et al. found that dsb gene transcription was not dependent on the temperature of in vitro growth (37 vs 42°C) [45]. So far only one transcriptomic study has documented that dba and dsbI transcript abundance is iron-dependent. Interestingly, the authors stated that the transcription of dba and dsbI was antagonistically regulated by iron accessibility, depending on the experimental conditions, i. e. iron-activated shortly after iron addition into the medium and iron-repressed in the mid-log phase of growth [40]. All cited transcriptomic experiments were conducted on mRNA derived from C. jejuni NCTC 11168, a strain which has the shorter, non-functional dsbA2 version.

Our experiments, conducted on C. jejuni 480 wild type expressing β-galactosidase from different dsb gene promoters of C. jejuni 81-176, demonstrated that they are all regulated in response to iron availability. Our data are generally consistent with those derived from transcriptomic analysis. The strongest of the analyzed promoters, P dsbA1 , which was down-regulated in iron starvation conditions, was not identified in comparative transcriptomic experiments conducted by Holmes et al., although that work revealed P dsbA2dsbBastA iron dependence [6]. Such inconsistency of experimental data might be due to limited sensitivity of the transcriptomic strategy previously used. The transcription level of dsbA1 is only slightly affected by iron concentration, whereas the transcription level from P dsbA2dsbBastA decreases about 10-fold in response to iron deficiency. The dsb gene promoters are antagonistically regulated by iron availability, at least under conditions used in this study. Thus, abundance of both periplasmic oxidoreductases, DsbA1 and DsbA2, decreases when iron becomes restricted, while DsbB and DsbI membrane oxidoreductases are synthesized constitutively, in different extracellular iron concentrations. This might suggest that iron-storage proteins or non-essential iron-using proteins might be direct or indirect targets of the Dsb oxidative pathway involving activity of DsbA1/DsbB or DsbA2/DsbB redox pairs.

In some microorganisms, positive regulation by Fur and iron is provided by action of sRNAs which are themselves regulated by iron-complexed Fur - these sRNAs pair with their target mRNAs and promote their degradation (reviewed in [46]). However, P dsbA2dsbBastA and P dsbA1 promoters are not regulated that way, since the level of β-galactosidase in iron-sufficient medium is comparable in wild-type and fur mutated cells. This observation proved that these promoters are not induced by iron-bound Fur, as the level of β-galactosidase expressed from these two fusions is higher in response to iron limitation in the fur mutant than in the wild type cells. The most probable explanation of these results is that iron-free Fur is capable of repressing their transcription. Palyada et al. [40] performed in silico analysis aimed at Campylobacter Fur box identification. They inspected 16 DNA fragments located upstream of iron and Fur repressed genes, which allowed them to establish the potential Fur box sequence motif. However, only eleven of the analyzed promoters included this element [40]. So far C. jejuni's potential Fur box for apo-Fur repressed genes remains undetermined.

In the present study the EMSA assays confirmed that although all the analyzed promoters were members of the Fur regulon, each of them was regulated by a different mechanism. We showed that both iron-free and iron-complexed Fur can act as a repressor. The observed potential dual regulation of the P dsbA2dsbBastA promoter, dependent on Fur concentration, still remains unclear. An explanation for this phenomenon requires deeper understanding of the C. jejuni fur gene expression. In contrast to E. coli, the C. jejuni fur gene expression is not autoregulated, and additionally, the iron-responsive Fur regulator of C. jejuni is expressed from two separate promoters [47]. Our findings further indicate that transcription under iron-starvation can be controlled by Fur indirectly, as was observed for the dsbA1 gene. The sophisticated mechanism regulating dsb gene transcription in response to iron availability may be responsible for subtle changes in the abundance and/or activity of various substrates in the Dsb system. We demonstrated that activity of C. jejuni 81-176 AstA, which is a direct target of Dsb system, is dependent on iron level in the medium. However, as AstA level is dependent on the activities of both DsbA1 and DsbA2 (unpublished results), details of the process remain unclear.

Recently performed comparative Helicobacter pylori and Neisseria gonorrhoeae transcriptomic analysis also indicated that genes included in the Fur regulon can be positively or negatively regulated in response to iron availability [38, 48]. Like C. jejuni Fur, H. pylori Fur also binds to some promoters in its iron-free form to repress their expression [38, 4951]. C. jejuni Fur reveals a relatively high degree of amino acid identity with H. pylori Fur. Nonetheless it is not able to complement apo-Fur regulation in an H. pylori fur mutant when delivered in trans [52]. Such unexpected results might be due to subtle differences in conformation of both proteins. Additional experiments, such as solving the three dimensional structure of C. jejuni Fur, are required to clarify the functional differences between Fur proteins of these closely related species. Although both species have AT-rich genomes and some of their promoters have similar structure, it can not be excluded that the C. jejuni apo-Fur binding nucleotide sequences are not identical as those determined for H. pylori apo-Fur. Also two H. pylori promoters, the pfr and sod gene promoters that are repressed by apo-Fur, exhibited low sequence similarity and revealed different affinities for apo-Fur [38, 50].

The second part of our research was aimed at understanding the relationship between dba and dsbI expression. Experiments employing point mutated dba provided evidence for strong translational coupling of the dba and dsbI genes. Inhibition or premature termination of dba mRNA translation resulted in the lack of DsbI. This defect was not complemented by the intact chromosomal dba gene in C. jejuni 81-176 dsbI::cat. Translational coupling has already been described and is common among functionally related bacterial genes. It was documented that in many cases it involves operons containing overlapping genes as well as genes constituting an operon and divided by short intergenic region [53, 54]. C. jejuni 81-176 dba and dsbI do not overlap, but are separated by a relatively short intergenic region (11 bp). Experiments employing a recombinant plasmid that expressed only DsbI verified the importance of the dba-dsbI mRNA secondary structure for its translation. Preliminary prediction of the secondary structure for the mRNA region spanning the entire dba gene and the 5' end of the dsbI gene, indicated that the dsbI RBS is located within a stem-loop structure formed by a sequence fragment upstream of the RBS (including the 3' part of the dba gene) as well as one downstream of the RBS and spanning the initiator codon of the dsbI gene. This suggests that mRNA translation of the dsbI gene may be blocked due to the occlusion of the RBS, and that translation of the dba mRNA may make the RBS of the dsbI gene accessible and hence enable the translation of the dsbI gene as well. Verification of this hypothesis requires further analysis.

This coupling mechanism may facilitate interaction between two proteins expressed from the same operon. Data obtained in our study showed that in the absence of Dba, DsbI is intensively degraded in E. coli cells. Also in C. jejuni Δdba-dsbI::cat cells harboring a recombinant plasmid enabling expression of only DsbI, this protein migrates on SDS-PAGE slightly faster than DsbI produced by wild type cells. It was suggested by in silico analysis that the N-terminal domain of DsbI contains five transmembrane helixes and its C-terminal domain achieve a β-propeller structure and localize in the periplasm [18]. DsbI localization in the inner-membrane was documented by a cell fractionation experiment (data not shown). In silico prediction also localizes Dba in the IM. Although the specific mechanism of Dba and DsbI interplay is yet unknown, we hypothesize that Dba can act as a periplasmic or transmembrane chaperone, providing the proper folding of the DsbI C-terminal domain, which might be a prerequisite for recruiting other proteins to form an active protein complex.


The present work documents that iron concentration is a significant factor influencing dsb gene transcription. Preliminary results of proteomic experiments aimed at identification of Campylobacter Dsb system targets suggest that mutations in dsb genes influence the level of a dozen extracytoplasmic proteins (manuscript in preparation). One of them is the periplasmic LivJ protein, which contains four cysteine residues and is involved in the colonization process as shown by Hendrixon and DiRita [55]. Moreover proteomic analysis of iron-regulated C. jejuni protein expression done by Holmes et al. showed that LivJ abundance is iron-dependent. Because livJ gene transcription is not iron nor Fur dependent, most likely the changes in the abundance of this protein are influenced by activity of the Dsb system [6]. Taken together, these results support the notion that iron concentration -through the influence on dsb gene expression - might control abundance of the extracytoplasmic proteins during different stages of infection. Our work further shows that the synthesis of the DsbI membrane oxidoreductase is controlled by a translational coupling mechanism. Among bacterial genomes sequenced so far, those of C. jejuni strains are extremely compact. About 95% of their content is occupied by protein-coding regions and more than 25% of all genes overlap. Presumably, translational coupling occurs during expression of many other C. jejuni operons containing tail-to-head oriented genes with short or no intergenic regions.


  1. Young KT, Davis LM, Dirita VJ: Campylobacter jejuni: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007, 5 (9): 665-679. 10.1038/nrmicro1718.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore JE, Corcoran D, Dooley JS, Fanning S, Lucey B, Matsuda M, McDowell DA, Megraud F, Millar BC, O'Mahony R, et al: Campylobacter. Vet Res. 2005, 36 (3): 351-382. 10.1051/vetres:2005012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reid AN, Pandey R, Palyada K, Naikare H, Stintzi A: Identification of Campylobacter jejuni genes involved in the response to acidic pH and stomach transit. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74 (5): 1583-1597. 10.1128/AEM.01507-07.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Malik-Kale P, Parker CT, Konkel ME: Culture of Campylobacter jejuni with sodium deoxycholate induces virulence gene expression. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190 (7): 2286-2297. 10.1128/JB.01736-07.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Woodall CA, Jones MA, Barrow PA, Hinds J, Marsden GL, Kelly DJ, Dorrell N, Wren BW, Maskell DJ: Campylobacter jejuni gene expression in the chick cecum: evidence for adaptation to a low-oxygen environment. Infect Immun. 2005, 73 (8): 5278-5285. 10.1128/IAI.73.8.5278-5285.2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Holmes K, Mulholland F, Pearson BM, Pin C, McNicholl-Kennedy J, Ketley JM, Wells JM: Campylobacter jejuni gene expression in response to iron limitation and the role of Fur. Microbiology. 2005, 151 (Pt 1): 243-257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stintzi A, Marlow D, Palyada K, Naikare H, Panciera R, Whitworth L, Clarke C: Use of genome-wide expression profiling and mutagenesis to study the intestinal lifestyle of Campylobacter jejuni. Infect Immun. 2005, 73 (3): 1797-1810. 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1797-1810.2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sampathkumar B, Napper S, Carrillo CD, Willson P, Taboada E, Nash JH, Potter AA, Babiuk LA, Allan BJ: Transcriptional and translational expression patterns associated with immobilized growth of Campylobacter jejuni. Microbiology. 2006, 152 (Pt 2): 567-577.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalmokoff M, Lanthier P, Tremblay TL, Foss M, Lau PC, Sanders G, Austin J, Kelly J, Szymanski CM: Proteomic analysis of Campylobacter jejuni 11168 biofilms reveals a role for the motility complex in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (12): 4312-4320. 10.1128/JB.01975-05.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wosten MM, Parker CT, van Mourik A, Guilhabert MR, van Dijk L, van Putten JP: The Campylobacter jejuni PhosS/PhosR operon represents a non-classical phosphate-sensitive two-component system. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 62 (1): 278-291. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05372.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Raphael BH, Pereira S, Flom GA, Zhang Q, Ketley JM, Konkel ME: The Campylobacter jejuni response regulator, CbrR, modulates sodium deoxycholate resistance and chicken colonization. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187 (11): 3662-3670. 10.1128/JB.187.11.3662-3670.2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bras AM, Chatterjee S, Wren BW, Newell DG, Ketley JM: A novel Campylobacter jejuni two-component regulatory system important for temperature-dependent growth and colonization. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181 (10): 3298-3302.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wosten MM, Wagenaar JA, van Putten JP: The FlgS/FlgR two-component signal transduction system regulates the fla regulon in Campylobacter jejuni. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (16): 16214-16222. 10.1074/jbc.M400357200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MacKichan JK, Gaynor EC, Chang C, Cawthraw S, Newell DG, Miller JF, Falkow S: The Campylobacter jejuni dccRS two-component system is required for optimal in vivo colonization but is dispensable for in vitro growth. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 54 (5): 1269-1286. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04371.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lasica AM, Jagusztyn-Krynicka EK: The role of Dsb proteins of Gram-negative bacteria in the process of pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2007, 31 (5): 626-636. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00081.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heras B, Shouldice SR, Totsika M, Scanlon MJ, Schembri MA, Martin JL: DSB proteins and bacterial pathogenicity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009, 7 (3): 215-225. 10.1038/nrmicro2087.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dutton RJ, Boyd D, Berkmen M, Beckwith J: Bacterial species exhibit diversity in their mechanisms and capacity for protein disulfide bond formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008, 105 (33): 11933-11938. 10.1073/pnas.0804621105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Raczko AM, Bujnicki JM, Pawlowski M, Godlewska R, Lewandowska M, Jagusztyn-Krynicka EK: Characterization of new DsbB-like thiol-oxidoreductases of Campylobacter jejuni and Helicobacter pylori and classification of the DsbB family based on phylogenomic, structural and functional criteria. Microbiology. 2005, 151 (1): 219-231. 10.1099/mic.0.27483-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yao R, Guerry P: Molecular cloning and site-specific mutagenesis of a gene involved in arylsulfatase production in Campylobacter jejuni. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178 (11): 3335-3338.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kwon AR, Choi EC: Role of disulfide bond of arylsulfate sulfotransferase in the catalytic activity. Arch Pharm Res. 2005, 28 (5): 561-565. 10.1007/BF02977759.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Malojcic G, Owen RL, Grimshaw JP, Brozzo MS, Dreher-Teo H, Glockshuber R: A structural and biochemical basis for PAPS-independent sulfuryl transfer by aryl sulfotransferase from uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008, 105 (49): 19217-19222. 10.1073/pnas.0806997105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lasica AM, Wyszynska A, Szymanek K, Majewski P, Jagusztyn-Krynicka EK: Campylobacter protein oxidation influences epithelial cell invasion or intracellular survival as well as intestinal tract colonization in chickens. J Appl Genet. 2010, 51 (3): 383-393. 10.1007/BF03208868.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Korlath JA, Osterholm MT, Judy LA, Forfang JC, Robinson RA: A point-source outbreak of campylobacteriosis associated with consumption of raw milk. J Infect Dis. 1985, 152 (3): 592-596. 10.1093/infdis/152.3.592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wassenaar TM, Fry BN, van der Zeijst BA: Genetic manipulation of Campylobacter: evaluation of natural transformation and electro-transformation. Gene. 1993, 132 (1): 131-135. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90525-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van Vliet AH, Wooldridge KG, Ketley JM: Iron-responsive gene regulation in a Campylobacter jejuni fur mutant. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180 (20): 5291-5298.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sambrook J, Russel DW: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor. 2001, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yao R, Alm RA, Trust TJ, Guerry P: Construction of new Campylobacter cloning vectors and a new mutational cat cassette. Gene. 1993, 130 (1): 127-130. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90355-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ditta G, Stanfield S, Corbin D, Helinski DR: Broad host range DNA cloning system for gram-negative bacteria: construction of a gene bank of Rhizobium meliloti. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1980, 77 (12): 7347-7351. 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7347.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Labigne-Roussel A, Harel J, Tompkins L: Gene transfer from Escherichia coli to Campylobacter species: development of shuttle vectors for genetic analysis of Campylobacter jejuni. J Bacteriol. 1987, 169 (11): 5320-5323.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Davis L, Young K, DiRita V: Genetic manipulation of Campylobacter jejuni. Curr Prot Microbiol. 2008, Chapter 8: Unit 8A 2 1-8A 2 17

    Google Scholar 

  31. Miller JH: Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 1972, New York: Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wright JA, Grant AJ, Hurd D, Harrison M, Guccione EJ, Kelly DJ, Maskell DJ: Metabolite and transcriptome analysis of Campylobacter jejuni in vitro growth reveals a stationary-phase physiological switch. Microbiology. 2009, 155 (Pt 1): 80-94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hendrixson DR, DiRita VJ: Transcription of sigma54-dependent but not sigma28-dependent flagellar genes in Campylobacter jejuni is associated with formation of the flagellar secretory apparatus. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 50 (2): 687-702. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03731.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wosten MM, Boeve M, Koot MG, van Nuenen AC, van der Zeijst BA: Identification of Campylobacter jejuni promoter sequences. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180 (3): 594-599.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Delany I, Grifantini R, Bartolini E, Rappuoli R, Scarlato V: Effect of Neisseria meningitidis fur mutations on global control of gene transcription. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (7): 2483-2492. 10.1128/JB.188.7.2483-2492.2006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee HW, Choe YH, Kim DK, Jung SY, Lee NG: Proteomic analysis of a ferric uptake regulator mutant of Helicobacter pylori: regulation of Helicobacter pylori gene expression by ferric uptake regulator and iron. Proteomics. 2004, 4 (7): 2014-2027. 10.1002/pmic.200300740.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Delany I, Rappuoli R, Scarlato V: Fur functions as an activator and as a repressor of putative virulence genes in Neisseria meningitidis. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 52 (4): 1081-1090. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04030.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ernst FD, Bereswill S, Waidner B, Stoof J, Mader U, Kusters JG, Kuipers EJ, Kist M, van Vliet AH, Homuth G: Transcriptional profiling of Helicobacter pylori Fur- and iron-regulated gene expression. Microbiology. 2005, 151 (Pt 2): 533-546.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wyszynska A, Pawlowski M, Bujnicki J, Pawelec D, Van Putten JP, Brzuszkiewicz E, Jagusztyn-Krynicka EK: Genetic characterisation of the cjaAB operon of Campylobacter coli. Pol J Microbiol. 2006, 55 (2): 85-94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Palyada K, Threadgill D, Stintzi A: Iron acquisition and regulation in Campylobacter jejuni. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (14): 4714-4729. 10.1128/JB.186.14.4714-4729.2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Totsika M, Heras B, Wurpel DJ, Schembri MA: Characterization of two homologous disulfide bond systems involved in virulence factor biogenesis in uropathogenic Escherichia coli CFT073. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191 (12): 3901-3908. 10.1128/JB.00143-09.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin D, Kim B, Slauch JM: DsbL and DsbI contribute to periplasmic disulfide bond formation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Microbiology. 2009, 155 (Pt 12): 4014-4024.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Grimshaw JP, Stirnimann CU, Brozzo MS, Malojcic G, Grutter MG, Capitani G, Glockshuber R: DsbL and DsbI form a specific dithiol oxidase system for periplasmic arylsulfate sulfotransferase in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 2008, 380 (4): 667-680. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.031.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Petersen L, Larsen TS, Ussery DW, On SL, Krogh A: RpoD promoters in Campylobacter jejuni exhibit a strong periodic signal instead of a -35 box. J Mol Biol. 2003, 326 (5): 1361-1372. 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00034-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Stintzi A: Gene expression profile of Campylobacter jejuni in response to growth temperature variation. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185 (6): 2009-2016. 10.1128/JB.185.6.2009-2016.2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Masse E, Salvail H, Desnoyers G, Arguin M: Small RNAs controlling iron metabolism. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007, 10 (2): 140-145. 10.1016/j.mib.2007.03.013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. van Vliet AH, Rock JD, Madeleine LN, Ketley JM: The iron-responsive regulator Fur of Campylobacter jejuni is expressed from two separate promoters. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000, 188 (2): 115-118.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Jackson LA, Ducey TF, Day MW, Zaitshik JB, Orvis J, Dyer DW: Transcriptional and functional analysis of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae Fur regulon. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192 (1): 77-85. 10.1128/JB.00741-09.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Danielli A, Amore G, Scarlato V: Built shallow to maintain homeostasis and persistent infection: insight into the transcriptional regulatory network of the gastric human pathogen Helicobacter pylori. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6 (6): e1000938-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000938.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Delany I, Spohn G, Rappuoli R, Scarlato V: The Fur repressor controls transcription of iron-activated and -repressed genes in Helicobacter pylori. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 42 (5): 1297-1309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Danielli A, Scarlato V: Regulatory circuits in Helicobacter pylori : network motifs and regulators involved in metal-dependent responses. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010, 34 (5): 738-752.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Miles S, Carpenter BM, Gancz H, Merrell DS: Helicobacter pylori apo-Fur regulation appears unconserved across species. J Microbiol. 2010, 48 (3): 378-386. 10.1007/s12275-010-0022-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Mathiesen G, Huehne K, Kroeckel L, Axelsson L, Eijsink VG: Characterization of a new bacteriocin operon in sakacin P-producing Lactobacillus sakei, showing strong translational coupling between the bacteriocin and immunity genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71 (7): 3565-3574. 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3565-3574.2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Waldo RH, Krause DC: Synthesis, stability, and function of cytadhesin P1 and accessory protein B/C complex of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (2): 569-575. 10.1128/JB.188.2.569-575.2006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Hendrixson DR, DiRita VJ: Identification of Campylobacter jejuni genes involved in commensal colonization of the chick gastrointestinal tract. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 52 (2): 471-484. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.03988.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Simon R, Priefer U, Puhler A: A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: Transposon mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria. Nat Biotech. 1983, 1 (9): 784-791. 10.1038/nbt1183-784.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Jeff Hansen for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Ewa Kosykowska for performing some complementation experiments as well as Lukasz Kozlowski and Janusz M. Bujnicki for RNA sequence analysis. This work was supported by two grants from Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (No. 2P04C 01527 and N N303 341835).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elzbieta K Jagusztyn-Krynicka.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

ADG conducted out most of the laboratory work. MW and MN, working under supervision of EKJK and ADG, contributed to construction of some transcriptional fusion, mutated C. jejuni strains and translational coupling experiments. AML did RT-PCR experiments for the dba-dsbI operon as well as expression of dsbI from its own promoter, and was involved in drafting the manuscript. RG performed experiments concerning influence of iron concentration on cjaA gene expression and AstA activity level. PR performed EMSA assays. AW performed experiments concerning DsbI glycosylation. EKJK conceived the study. EKJK and ADG designed the experiments, and were engaged in data interpretation and drafting the manuscript. All authors read and accepted the final version of the manuscript.

An erratum to this article is available at

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Arylsulfatase (AstA) assay in C. jejuni 81-176 cells. Arylsulfatase (AstA) activity of C. jejuni 81-176 cultivated on MH liquid medium under high- and low-iron conditions (chelator) till the culture reached OD600 ~0,6-0,7. Results are from four assays with each sample performed in triplicate. Values are reported as arylsulphatase units. One unit equals the amount of arylsulfatase required to generate 1 nmol of nitrophenol h-1 per OD600 of 1. (DOC 34 KB)

Additional file 2: Experiment details concerning DsbI stability and glycosylation. (DOC 72 KB)


Additional file 3: Influence of the dba /Dba on DsbI stability in E. coli cells. Western blot (anti-rDsbI) analysis of C. jejuni/E. coli protein extracts separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. Relative positions of molecular weight markers (lane 1) are listed on the left (in kilodaltons). Lanes 2-7 contain 20 μg of total proteins from: C. jejuni 81-176 wt (2), E. coli/pBluescript II KS (3), E. coli/pUWM453 (dba-dsbI) (4), E. coli/pUWM454 (dba) (5), E. coli/pUWM455 (dsbI) (6) and E. coli/pUWM456 (dba-dsbI) (7) (DOC 120 KB)


Additional file 4: DsbI glycosylation. Western blot (anti-rDsbI) analysis of C. jejuni protein extracts separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. A - proteins isolated from C. jejuni 81-176 wt and pglB isogenic mutant. Relative positions of molecular weight markers (lane 1) are listed on the left (in kilodaltons). Lanes 2 and 3 contain 20 μg of total proteins from: C. jejuni 81-176 wt (2) and C. jejuni 81-176 pglB::cat (3). B - proteins isolated from C. jejuni 480 AL4 (dsbI::cat) overexpressing DsbI or the mutated version of the protein DsbI. Relative positions of molecular weight markers (lane 1) are listed on the left (in kilodaltons). Lanes 2-4 contain 20 μg of total proteins from: C. jejuni 480 AL4/pUWM762 (DsbI N292A) (2), AL4/pUWM765 (DsbI N340A) (3) and AL4/pUWM769 (the shuttle plasmid containing a wild type copy of the C. jejuni dsbI gene) (4) (DOC 114 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grabowska, A.D., Wandel, M.P., Łasica, A.M. et al. Campylobacter jejuni dsb gene expression is regulated by iron in a Fur-dependent manner and by a translational coupling mechanism. BMC Microbiol 11, 166 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: