Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Identification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis secreted proteins using an in vitro system mimicking the phagosomal environment

  • Jessica J. Chinison1, 2,
  • Lia Danelishvili1,
  • Rashmi Gupta1,
  • Sasha J. Rose1, 2,
  • Lmar M. Babrak1, 2 and
  • Luiz E. Bermudez1, 2Email author
BMC MicrobiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:270

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0889-y

Received: 13 August 2016

Accepted: 4 November 2016

Published: 9 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis is a common intracellular pathogen that infects patients with HIV/AIDS and cause lung infection in patients with underlying lung pathology. M.avium preferably infects macrophages and uses diverse mechanisms to alter phagosome maturation. Once in the macrophage, the pathogen can alter the host cellular defenses by secreting proteins into the cytosol of host cells, but despite considerable research, only a few secreted effector proteins have been identified. We hypothesized that the environmental cues inside the phagosome can trigger bacterial protein secretion. To identify M. avium secretome within the phagosome, we utilized a previously established in vitro system that mimics the metal ion concentrations and pH of the M. avium phagosome.

Results

M. avium was exposed to phagosome metal concentrations for different time points and exported proteins were profiled and analyzed against bacterial proteins secreted in the culture medium. Mass spectrometric analysis of the secreted proteome identified several proteins, of which 46 were unique to bacteria incubated in the metal mixture. Ten of potential effectors were selected and secretion of these proteins was monitored within M. avium infected mononuclear phagocytic cells using the beta-lactamase FRET-based reporter system. In addition, pull-down assay was performed for secreted calmodulin-like protein MAV_1356 protein to evaluate for eukaryotic target. All examined M. avium proteins were secreted into the macrophage cytosol, and gene expression analysis suggested that the metal environment likely stimulates secretion of pre-made proteins. Further investigation of bacterial secreted MAV_1356 protein, lead to the observation that the MAV_1356 interacts with the host proteins Annexin A1 and Protein S100-A8.

Conclusions

We established an in vitro system for the study if proteins secreted intracellularly, and revealed that the metal mixture mimicking the concentration of metals in the phagosome environment, triggers protein secretion.

Keywords

Mycobacterium aviumMacrophagesSecretionProteinsCytoplasmPhagosome metal concentrations

Background

Mycobacterium avium subspecies hominissuis (M. avium), an opportunistic pathogen found ubiquitously in the environment, is known to infect different mammalian hosts [1, 2]. Its transmission to humans occurs mainly through the gastrointestinal or respiratory routes [1]. M. avium is capable of infecting different cell types, but preferentially resides within macrophages [3]. Like Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. avium survives and replicates within macrophages by blocking phagosome maturation and the fusion between the phagosome and lysosome [4], but many steps and mechanisms involved are still incompletely understood. The pathogen affects the transport of acid into the phagosome, as well as directly interferes with the trafficking of molecules associated with phagosome maturation in the cytosol [5].

Environmental cues, including metal ions present in the bacterial environment, can influence or control bacterial gene expression in general, including virulence factors. In Salmonella enterica spp. enterica serovar Typhimurium, the expression of the PhoP/PhoQ and the PmrA/PmrB, two component regulatory systems, are controlled by single elements in the environment [6]. The PhoP/PhoQ system responds to the magnesium concentration inside phagosomes, whereas the PmrA/PmrB system is regulated by iron level [6, 7]. Upon sensing environmental factors, such as the presence of antimicrobial peptides and different cations levels, both systems promote the expression of different genes such as pagP, lpxO, pagL, pbgP and ugd, resulting in several modifications on the bacterial lipopolysaccharide structure and the resistance to polymyxin [7, 8]. In Yersinia, the activation of the type III secretion system (T3SS) and the secretion of Yop effector proteins are dependent on the concentration of calcium. At a low calcium concentration, Yersinia T3SS delivers YopH and YopE outside of the bacterial cells, leading to disruption of the cytoskeleton and consequently prevention of phagocytosis [9].

The macrophage intraphagosomal metal composition of virulent and avirulent mycobacterial species has been described [10]. Using a hard X-ray microprobe, changes in iron, chlorine, calcium, potassium, manganese, copper and zinc concentrations inside the phagosome of macrophages infected either with M. smegmatis, M. avium or M. tuberculosis were documented. For example, diminished iron content was detected in the phagosomes of macrophages infected with M. smegmatis at different periods of time compared with macrophages infected with either M. avium or M. tuberculosis [10]. Following this finding, an in vitro system mimicking the single elements of the intracellular environment of the phagosome was developed [11]. A metal mixture was created, reproducing the concentrations of metal ion and pH of the phagosome at 1 and 24 h post-infection. Upon M. avium exposure to the 24 h metal mixture, expression was observed of a significant number of mycobacterial genes known to be upregulated within macrophages and in vivo. In addition, exposure to the combination of potassium chloride, calcium chloride and manganese chloride was sufficient to partially induce “the intracellular mycobacterial phenotype” associated with efficient uptake by surrounding macrophages once the bacteria escapes the macrophage [11]. These results demonstrate that this in vitro system could become a useful tool to study host-pathogen interaction.

Secretion of effector proteins leads to change in the pathogen environment and alterations of signal transduction and traffic mechanisms in the phagocytic cells. Many intracellular pathogens such as M. tuberculosis, Legionella, Coxiella, Salmonella and others, have been shown to depend on secreted molecules to control their environment inside the host for survival and replication [1215]. There is substantial evidence that M. avium interferes with the macrophage function from inside of the vacuole [5, 16], and the expression of proteins on the bacterial surface or the export of effectors into the vacuole and/or the cytoplasm is manner to interact with the phagocyte.

Since protein secretion by the bacteria can certainly be a response to an environmental stimulus, we hypothesized that metals in the macrophage vacuole can have significant influence on secretion of pathogen-derived proteins. Here, we established an in vitro system for studying M. avium protein secretion and revealed that the metal mixture triggered protein secretion process.

Methods

M. avium and macrophage cultures

Mycobacterium avium subspecies hominissuis 104 (M. avium 104) was isolated from the blood of an AIDS patient and cultured on Middlebrook 7H10 agar supplemented with 10 % oleic acid, albumin, dextrose and catalase (OADC, Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA) at 37 °C for 7 days. Human THP-1 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA), cultivated in RPMI-1640 medium (Cellgro, Manassas, VA) supplemented with 10 % heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine and 25 mM HEPES, and incubated at 37 °C with 5 % CO2.

M. avium exposure to metal mixture

The 24 h metal mixture used in this study was prepared as previously published [11] and is shown in Table 1. Freshly grown M. avium was resuspended in PBS, inoculated into Middlebrook 7H9 broth supplemented with OADC, and incubated at 37 °C for 5 days under 200 rpm of rotation. Unless noted specifically, all future mentions of 7H9 and 7H10 will be supplemented with 10 % OADC. After centrifugation at 2000 × g for 20 min, the bacterial pellet was washed, and then resuspended in 7H9 broth (without OADC). After passing the suspension 10 times through a 22-gauge needle to disperse clumped bacteria, the optical density (OD) was measured and adjusted to McFarland standard #1 (3 × 108 CFU/ml). M. avium (3 × 107CFU/ml) were inoculated into 7H9 broth or the 24 h metal mixture, and incubated shaking at 37 °C for either 4 or 24 h. The original inoculum was confirmed with serial dilution and plating for CFU. After 4 and 24 h post-exposure, bacterial viability was assessed with fluorescent microscopy using a commercially available live/dead BacLight kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The pH was measured at both time points and shown to be 5.8. After 4 or 24 h incubation, the cultures were centrifuged at 2000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C to collect supernatants.
Table 1

The elemental mixtures reproducing metal concentrations and pH of 1h and 24h M. avium phagosome

Supplement

Elemental mix added to 500 ml of Middlebrook 7H9 broth

1h (pH 6.6)

24h (nM, pH 5.8)

1 M potassium chloride

14.7 ml

0.925 ml (1.79)

1 M calcium chloride

2 ml

1.25 ml (2.42)

1 M manganese chloride

5.9 ml

11.9 ml (23)

1 M copper sulfate

1.85 μl

5.5 μl (0.01)

1 M zinc chloride

33 μl

58.7 μl (0.11)

0.25 M ferric pyrophosphate

288 μl

2 ml (0.97)

1 M nickel chloride

5 μl

5 μl (0.01)

Secreted proteome and mass spectrometry

Metal or 7H9 exposed supernatants were filtered through a 0.2 μm syringe filter and size fractionated using 300 and 3kDa size-exclusion centrifugal filters (Pall, Ann Harbor, MI). The concentrated protein fraction between 3 and 300kDa was resolved with SDS-PAGE through a 12 % gel following standard protocols until the samples travelled 1cm through the gel. The gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue and then excised. Samples were distained and processed for the Protease Max in-gel trypsin digestion (Promega, Madison WI), following the manufacturer protocol. Digested proteins were further purified with a Michrom Peptide CapTrap column and C18 column (Agilent Zorbax 300SB-C18, 250 × 0.3mm, 5μm). Samples were sequenced and analyzed in the Mass Spectrometry Facility at Oregon State University using the LC-MS/MS with a Thermo LTQ-TF MS coupled to a Waters nanoAcquity UPLC system. Raw data was blasted against the Proteome Discoverer v1.3.0. and Mascot v2.3 database and Scaffold was used for search data compilation and data evaluation. The assay was repeated independently two times, and we only considered the proteins identified in both assays (96 % of the total proteins).

Cloning of M. avium genes into beta-lactamase reporter vector

M. avium 104 genomic DNA was extracted as previously described [17, 18]. Primers specific to 10 M. avium 104 genes were designed for PCR amplification and are listed in Table 2. Amplicons were processed for electrophoresis on 1 % agarose gel, and purified with the QIAquick PCR purification kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands). The genes of interest were cloned into BamHI and EcoRI sites of the pMV261-BlaC vector containing the beta-lactamase gene lacking the signal sequence. Resulted constructs were propagated in E.coli grown in LB broth supplemented with kanamycin 50 μg/ml.
Table 2

Primers used in the study

Gene Name

Experiment

Primer

Sequence (5′ to 3′)

MAV_0502

BlaC

F

GGATCCATGCTCGACGCCGTG

R

GAATTCTTGCCCCGCAATGAGAACG

RT-PCR

F

GTGAGCTGCAATGTCGGATG

R

GCAGTACTGGTGCAGATCGT

MAV_0516

BlaC

F

GGATCCATGCCACAGGGAACTGTG

R

GAATTCCAGGGAGCGGACTCCG

RT-PCR

F

ACAGGGAACTGTGAAGTGGTT

R

GATTTCGAACTCGACCTTCTGG

MAV_0628

BlaC

F

GGATCCATGAGCACATCCAACACAGTC

R

GAATTCGGGCGGGCAGGAGTG

RT-PCR

F

TCGCCGAGGGGTTACTCA

R

AGGTAGTCGATGACGTTGCC

MAV_1356

BlaC

F

GGATCCATGGCGGCGATGAAG

R

GAATTCGCTGGAGCTCGTGACG

RT-PCR

F

ATGGCGGCGATGAAGCC

R

CTTGAGTTCGTCACGGAGGG

MAV_4394

BlaC

F

GGATCCGTGAAAACTCACCGGATCG

R

GAATTCGACGAGAGGTGCTTGCGAAG

RT-PCR

F

CCTACGGGGTCAACTATGCC

R

CACGATGTCCATCACCGAGG

MAV_1419

BlaC

F

GGATCCAATGTTCTCGCGCCGCATCATCACC

R

GAATTCGGCGGGCTGGCCGGAGAATTGCGGG

RT-PCR

F

CGATGAGATGTTCCTCGCCC

R

MAV_0398

BlaC

F

GGATCCAATGACCATGCGGATCACGCGGGTTTGCCGGGCGGT

R

GAATTCTTGACCCAGCGCGTTTTGCATGGCCCCGG

RT-PCR

F

GACGAGAACTGGACCAAGCA

R

TATTGACCCAGCGCGTTTTG

MAV_1177

BlaC

F

GGATCCATGAGCATCAACTACCAGTTC

R

GAATTCGGCCCAGCTGGACC

RT-PCR

F

ACTACCAGTTCGGCGATGTC

R

CGACCCAACTGGGTGATGAA

MAV_1178

BlaC

F

GGATCCATGGCAACACGTTTTATGACTG

R

GAATTCGCTGCTGAGGATCTGCTG

RT-PCR

F

TTATGACTGACCCGCACGAA

R

GTTGACGATGTTGCGGAAGG

MAV_4077

BlaC

F

GGATCCAATGGGGGACCAGCAGAGCGGGCCGCAGGAA

R

GAATTCTTGGTTCTTCTTCTGGCGCT

RT-PCR

F

GAAGGGCAAGGCCAAGGA

R

TCTTCTTCTGGCGCTCCTC

M. avium transformation and colony screening

M. avium competent cells were prepared as followed: 3 centrifugal washes at 2000 × g for 15 min with a chilled wash buffer constituted of 10 % glycerol and 0.1 % Tween-20. The final pellet was resuspended into 10 % glycerol. Cells were electroporated with plasmid DNA and recovered for 4 h at 37 °C in 7H9 broth before being plated on 7H10 agar containing 400 μg/ml of kanamycin. After 10 days incubation at 37 °C, colonies were screened with PCR for the presence of kanamycin using the following primers: Full_Kan_For 5′ ATATTCAACGGGAAACGTCTTG 3′ and Full_Kan_Rev 5′CATCGAGCATCAAATGAAACTG 3′. The PCR program was as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 68 °C for 1 min and a final 68 °C for 5 min. Positive colonies were grown in 7H9 broth and 400 μg/ml of kanamycin. After 5 days incubation at 37 °C, the bacterial cultures were used for uptake, survival and beta-lactamase assays. Prior to the following experiments, the bacterial cultures were briefly vortexed, passed 10x through a 22-gauge needle to disperse clumps, and allowed to sediment for 5 min. Only the top half of the suspension was used as the inoculum.

Beta-lactamase reporter system

THP-1 cells were treated with 10 ng/ml of phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate to differentiate monocytic cells into macrophages, seeded at 80 % confluency into the 96-well plate (Greiner Bio-One, Monroe, North Carolina) and incubated for 24 h. Next day, culture media was replenished and THP-1 cells were rested additional 48h. Differentiated macrophages were infected with M. avium constructs and controls for 2 h at a multiplicity of infection 10 bacteria to 1 cell. The extracellular M. avium was removed by washing cells three times with HBSS. After carrying out intracellular infection for 3 days, infected cells were reloaded with CCF2-AM (Invitrogen), a beta-lactamase substrate, at 20 μg/ml in RPMI medium. Fluorescent measurements were taken every 15 min for 2 h using an Infinity 200 fluorometer (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland) with two filter sets: Excitation 405 ± 10 nm/emission 460 ± 20 nm and excitation 405 ± 10 nm/emission 530 ± 15 nm.

Fluorescent microscopy

THP-1 cells were also examined using an inverted fluorescent microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with the proper CCF2-AM filter sets listed above. Images were captured using a Retiga-2000R CCD camera and QCapture Pro software (QImaging, Surrey, BC, Canada).

Uptake and survival assay

THP-1 monocytes were differentiated as described above and seeded in 96-well plates at 80 % confluence. Macrophages were infected with ten M. avium constructs and controls at an MOI of 10. After 2 h of infection, cells were washed three times with HBSS, lysed, serially diluted and plated on 7H10 agar to determine bacterial colony forming unites (CFUs) and to calculate the M. avium invasion rate. To assess survival, cells were lysed and plated at 3 days post-infection. The infection/survival rates were compared to control groups.

RNA extraction and purification

M. avium experimental and control constructs were exposed to 1- or 24-h metal mixture and 7H9 broth for 1 and 24 h as a control. A two-step differential centrifugation was performed to separate the bacteria from the metals. After the first centrifugation at 55 × g for 15 min at 4 °C, the supernatant (containing the bacteria) was decanted and then centrifuged at 2000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C to collect bacteria. RNA was extracted from the resulting bacterial pellets as previously described [19]. Briefly, the pellet was resuspended into a buffer containing 500 mM of sodium acetate (pH = 4), 1 % triton X-100 and 0.6 % sodium dodecyl sulfate. The suspension was mixed with 0.1mm glass beads and homogenized at 4800 oscillations/minute in a bead-beater 6 times for 20 s and kept on ice in between each step. Samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 × g and then the supernatant was subjected to two separate phenol:chloroform extraction series with an ethanol precipitation and DNase treatment between the two extraction series. RNA was ethanol precipitated after the second extraction series, and resuspended into RNase-free H2O. This final resuspension was DNase treated a second time with the Turbo DNase system (Life Technologies) that efficiently removes the enzyme after digestion. The concentration and purity of bacterial RNA was measured using a NanoDrop 2000 instrument (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE). PCR was used to check for residual DNA by amplification of the 23s RNA gene and was negative for all RNA samples.

Reverse-transcription PCR analysis

cDNA was produced by reverse-transcription of the RNA using iScript reverse transcriptase (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), following the manufacturer protocol. cDNA was amplified using the primers listed in Table 2. The PCR program was as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, 31 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 59 °C for 30 s, 68 °C for 30 s and a final 68 °C for 5 min. The following primers, 23S_F 5′ GTAGCGAAATTCCTTGTCGG 3′ and 23_R 5′ TTCCCGCTTAGATGCTTTCAG 3′, recognizing the housekeeping gene, 23S RNA and the following PCR settings, 95 °C for 5 min., 95 °C for 30 s., 59 °C for 30 s., 68 °C for 1 min., for 31 cycles, were used to amplify the 23S RNA gene, which acted as a control in this experiment. cDNA amplicons were visualized with 1 % gel electrophoresis.

Protein-protein interaction

To create the MAV_1356 overexpression construct, the gene was amplified form the M. avium 104 chromosomal DNA using FideliTaq PCR master mix (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) and the PCR-generated fragment was cloned into the pET6xHN-N vector (Clontech). The protein was expressed in E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) and purified according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Clontech). Alternatively, THP-1 cells were harvested from the 75mc2 flask, washed and mechanical lysed in PBS. Cell lysate was cleared by centrifugation at 500 rpm for 10 min, filtered through 0.2 μm filter and labeled with the sulfo-NHS- LC biotin (Thermo Scientific) as previously described [20]. The purified MAV_1356 protein and the total protein extract from THP-1 cells were loaded to the column of His60 nickel resin and incubated for overnight at 4 °C with rotation. The columns that contained just THP-1 protein extract with no bacterial protein exposure served as a control for non-specific binding to nickel resin. Following day, columns were washed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Clontech) to remove unbound host cell proteins and MAV_1356 with possible bound host proteins were eluted with elution buffer. The samples were boiled in Laemmli sample buffer and separated onto SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and blocked with 3 % Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA). Membrane was probed with streptavidin antibody (Li-Cor Biosciences, Inc) at a dilution of 1:1000 for 1 h and visualized with the Odyssey Imager (Li-Cor). The proteins of interest were exercised from the gel and sent for the mass spectrometric analysis at the Oregon State University Proteomics facility.

Statistical analysis

A Student’s t test used to determine significance between experimental groups and control groups. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. GraphPad Prism version 6.0 was used for statistical analysis and graph creation.

Results

M. avium secretes unique proteins when incubated in a metal mixture mimicking the environment of the phagosome

Studying protein secretion inside host cells can be technically challenging and complex. For these reasons, an in vitro system mimicking metal concentrations in the vacuole environment of the macrophage and a proteomic-based approach were used to identify secreted proteins of M. avium strain 104. A total of 55 secreted proteins were identified when the bacteria were exposed for 4h and 24h to metal concentrations found in 24h M. avium vacuole and in the 7H9 culture supernatants of M. avium (Table 3). From 55 identified secreted proteins, 46 were uniquely associated with the 24 h metal mixture and absent in the 7H9 broth control confirming that bacteria in broth does not secrete many proteins during the short period of observation. Twenty proteins out of 46 were more abundant during 24 h of exposure than 4 h of incubation. Eighteen additional proteins were found only at 24 h of exposure. Only 2 proteins were found more abundant at 4 h than 24 h and 2 were unique to the 4-h exposure. Four proteins were found at equal levels regardless of metal exposure period. Majority of known secreted proteins including MAV_2816 and MAV_0214, which represented antigen 85-B and antigen 85-A respectively, were identified in metal-exposed condition at both time points. One third of the identified secreted proteins were putative uncharacterized proteins. Ten hypothetical genes, encoding for secreted proteins unique to the metal exposure, were chosen for further study. Criteria used to select this 10 candidates included proteins that had interesting motifs, were small in size (characteristic of many secreted proteins) and homologous to M. tuberculosis proteins shown to be secreted, and some unknown not yet identified as to be secreted in macrophages (Table 4).
Table 3

Proteins identified from M. avium 104 supernatant during exposure to metal mixture of the concentrations encountered in phagosome or control 7H9 broth

 

Peptide Abundance

M. avium protein

Identity

4h 7H9

4h metals

24h 7H9

24h metals

MAV_2017

Low molecular weight antigen

0

3

0

7

MAV_1178

Hypothetical protein

0

3

0

6

MAV_2193

Acyl carrier protein

1

4

5

6

MAV_4366

10 kDa chaperonin

1

2

5

3

MAV_1177

Hypothetical protein

0

2

0

3

MAV_4283

Probable Cutinase Cut3

0

2

0

8

MAV_0628

Hypothetical protein

0

2

0

3

MAV_3743

Elongation factor Ts

0

2

1

3

MAV_2859

ModD protein

0

1

0

4

MAV_0406

Glycerol kinase

0

2

0

5

MAV_4394

Serine esterase, Cutinase family protein

0

1

0

4

MAV_4507

50S ribosomal protein

0

1

0

3

MAV_2816

Antigen 85-B

0

3

0

3

MAV_2880

Malate synthase

0

3

0

3

MAV_1198

Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase

0

2

0

4

MAV_5271

Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase class-I

0

2

0

3

MAV_4079

Hypothetical protein

0

2

0

2

MAV_4583

Hypothetical protein

0

1

0

3

MAV_4695

Hypothetical protein

0

1

1

2

MAV_0182

Superoxide dismutase

0

2

0

1

MAV_0214

Antigen 85-A

0

1

0

2

MAV_0502

Hypothetical protein

0

1

0

3

MAV_0516

Conserved domain protein

0

1

0

3

MAV_4240

Two-component response regulator

0

1

0

3

MAV_4130

Immunogenic protein MPT64

0

0

0

3

MAV_3875

Electron transfer flavoprotein

0

0

0

3

MAV_1096

Protease

0

1

0

2

MAV_4274

PPE family protein

0

1

2

1

MAV_4077

Hypothetical protein

0

2

0

2

MAV_1356

Hypothetical protein

0

0

1

2

MAV_3557

Hypothetical protein

0

1

0

3

MAV_0239

Hypothetical protein

0

1

0

2

MAV_2019

Low molecular weight antigen MTB12

0

0

0

4

MAV_2763

Hypothetical protein

0

1

0

2

MAV_1419

Hypothetical protein

0

2

0

1

MAV_4707

60 kDa chaperonin 2

0

0

2

1

MAV_1204

Transcription elongation factor

0

0

0

2

MAV_0589

Hypothetical protein

0

0

0

3

MAV_2725

Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase

0

0

0

3

MAV_3539

Hypothetical protein

0

0

0

3

MAV_4986

ErfK/YbiS/YnhG family protein

0

0

0

3

MAV_4489

Elongation factor Tu

0

0

3

0

MAV_0435

Anti-sigma factor antagonist

0

0

0

2

MAV_2795

Hypothetical protein

0

0

0

2

MAV_0398

Hypothetical protein

0

0

0

2

MAV_0426

Intracellular protease

0

0

0

2

MAV_2345

Wag31 protein

0

0

0

2

MAV_2770

Thiol peroxidase

0

2

0

0

MAV_2905

PPE family protein

0

0

2

0

MAV_3158

Response regulator

0

0

0

2

MAV_3640

Antibiotic biosynthesis monooxygenase

0

0

0

2

MAV_3876

Electron transfer protein, beta subunit

0

0

0

2

MAV_4339

Phospoglycerate mutase family protein

0

0

0

2

MAV_4936

Succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase

0

0

0

2

MAV_1380

Malate dehydrogenase

0

2

0

0

Table 4

M. avium genes selected for intracellular confirmation

Gene

Function

Motif

M.tb homology

Secreted in M.tb

MAV_1178

Hypothetical protein

WXG100: ESAT-6 Type VII secretion target

Rv2347c

Unknown

MAV_1177

Hypothetical protein

WXG100: ESAT-6 Type VII secretion target

Rv2346c

Y

MAV_0628

Hypothetical protein

MHB: coiled-coil molecule that binds free haem in mycobacterial cytoplasm to deliver it to membrane proteins for shuttling through the membrane

None

N

MAV_4394

Hypothetical protein

Serine esterase, Cutinase family protein

Rv3451

Unknown

MAV_0502

Hypothetical protein

None

None

N

MAV_0516

Cold shock protein

CSPA: probably involved in cold acclimation process

Rv3648c

Y

MAV_4077

Hypothetical protein

CsbD: bacterial general stress response protein

None

N

MAV_1356

Hypothetical protein

98 % Homologues to M. tuberculosis calmodulin-like protein.

DUF: proteins with unknown function restricted to Actinobacteria

Rv1211

Y

MAV_1419

Hypothetical protein

DUF: proteins with unknown function restricted to Actinobacteria

None

N

MAV_0398

Hypothetical protein

PkhH_C: found as the periplasmic domain of the bacterial protein kinase PknH

Rv3705c

Y

Proteins secreted in the metal mixture are also exported during intracellular infection

To investigate if the secretion of selected proteins identified from the metal mixture proteome occurred during intracellular infection as well, a beta-lactamase reporter system was utilized. Constructs were made by fusing selected M. avium genes to a beta-lactamase without a secretion signal, and transformed into M. avium strain 104, which doesn’t encode a functional native beta-lactamase. THP-1 cells were infected with the different M. avium constructs, and after 3 days a mammalian FRET-based substrate was loaded into the cells. The substrate cleavage in the cytosol of macrophages would happen only if the M. avium/beta-lactamase fusion protein is secreted and present in the cytoplasm producing the differential fluorescent signal inside the host cells [17, 18]. In THP-1 cells infected with the M. avium pMV261-BlaC(-) negative control (beta-lactamase construct without signal peptide) CCF2 substrate cleavage does not occur and they fluorescent green (Fig. 1a); whereas in THP-1 macrophages infected with the M. avium pMV261-BlaC(+) positive control (beta-lactamase with signal sequence) substrate cleavage results in robust fluorescent changes from green to blue (Fig. 1b). Using this reporter system, intracellular secretion of ten selected proteins was confirmed. Since the fluorescent microscopy pictures looked similar for all 10 constructs, MAV_4077-BlaC and MAV_0516-BlaC were randomly selected and are shown in Fig. 1c–d, respectively. In addition, the secretion of MAV_1177, known protein to be secreted by M. tuberculosis, served as a positive control.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

M. avium secreted proteins within THP-1 macrophages. Differentiated THP-1 cells were infected with M. avium gene constructs fused to a beta-lactamase without secretion signal. After 3 days of infection, FRET-based substrate, CCF2-AM, was loaded into the cells and a shift in fluorescence was observed microscopically (ad) and quantitatively (e). a M. avium transformed with pMV261-BlaC(-) negative control. b M. avium transformed with pMV261-BlaC(+) positive control. Since all 10 of the tested secreted protein constructs produced a color change, we randomly picked MAV_4077 (c) and MAV_0516 (d). Bar, 10μm. e Calculated and normalized fluorescence ratios of the 10 tested protein constructs from the same wells where the fluorescent microscopy was conducted. f. Infection rate was calculated by bacterial CFU at 2 h of initial infection divided by the infection inoculum and normalized for small differences in inoculum between the constructs. g CFU of M. avium recovered during 3 days of infection. Bars represent mean values ± standard deviation. Data shown is representative of three biological replicates. Statistical comparisons: *P <0.05 and **P <0.01 when compared to pMV261-BlaC(+)

The amount of blue fluorescence in the cells was quantified using a fluorometer and directly correlates with the amount of secreted protein/beta-lactamase molecules. Majority of M. avium protein constructs elicited similar levels of blue fluorescence as the positive control. While MAV_0516 and MAV_1356 produced less protein secretion, MAV_4077 correlated with more protein export (Fig. 1e). To control for differences between the infection kinetics, bacterial uptake and survival at 3 days post-infection were determined by recording the CFU counts (Fig. 1f and g, respectively). The uptake of MAV_1178-BlaC, MAV_0502-BlaC and MAV_1419-BlaC were significantly impaired compared to the control pMV261-BlaC(+). In contrast, the uptake of MAV_0516 was significantly increased over the pMV261-BlaC(+) control. Regardless of the difference, 9 of the 10 M. avium constructs were able to survive and grow at 3 day post-infection with the exception of MAV_0398-BlaC that showed a decrease in survival (Fig. 1g).

Selected M. avium proteins are pre-synthesized upon exposure to the metal mixture

To determine whether M. avium exposure to the metal mixture would trigger gene expression, we performed a reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) analysis for the 10 confirmed secreted proteins [19]. M. avium 104 was exposed to 24-h metal mixture and control 7H9 broth for either 1 or 24 h and gene expression levels were quantified by the RT-PCR. As shown in the Fig. 2, similar gene expression levels were observed between the metal and 7H9 broth exposed bacteria at both time points. Since M. avium exposure to the metal mixture for 1 or 24 h did not changed the gene expression levels for any of the 10 genes selected, it suggests that these proteins were already pre-synthesized and the exposure to metals triggered/activated the protein secretion mechanism.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

M. avium gene expression levels during metal exposure. M. avium 104 was incubated in either 7H9 broth or the 24 h metal mixture for 4 and 24 h. The total RNAs for the10 confirmed secreted proteins were extracted and analyzed for gene expression by RT-PCR

The M. avium calmodulin-like protein interaction with host proteins

The MAV_1356 protein was produced in E. coli using the pET Expression system and purified with the His-Bind resin chromatography (Clontech) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The overexpression of MAV_1356 protein was confirmed in E. coli cell lysate by coomassie staining, and purified protein were visualized by western blotting using the 6XHN rabbit antibody (Clontech) (Fig. 3a). The mass spectrometric analysis was performed using the Thermo Fisher LTQ VELOS mass spectrometer. The unique bands bound to the bacterial MAV_1356 protein and present in the pull-down assay were identified as 38kDa Annexin A1 (P04083) and Protein S100-A8 (P05109) (Fig. 3b).
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Host proteins interacting with MAV_1356. a Lane 1, The western blotting of the 6HN-MAV_1356 protein; Lane 2, The coomassie staining of the E. coli total protein extract overexpressing the MAV_1356 protein; MM, Molecular Marker. b Lane 1, the biotin-labeled host proteins nonspecifically binding to the His60 nickel resin (control group without bacterial protein); Lane 2, the biotin-labeled total protein extract of THP-1 cells were exposed to the recombinant MAV_1356 (experimental group) and the bound proteins were visualized with streptavidin antibody as described in the materials and methods; Both groups were subjected to the same procedures. The unique proteins identified just in experimental lane was exercised and sequenced. The MAV_1356 bound host proteins were identified as Annexin A1 and Protein S100-A8

Discussion

M. avium survives and replicates in macrophages and, as many of intracellular pathogens, requires to secrete an array of effector proteins to establish its intracellular niche and prevent the killing mechanisms of phagocytic cells. Phagosomes of M.avium in macrophages are initially large, but segment and split in one bacterium, one phagosome after hours following phagocytosis [4]. Virulent mycobacteria inhibit phagosome acidification [1, 4, 5]. In this study, we utilized an in vitro system that mimics the concentrations of single metals in the phagosome of M. avium infected macrophages [10]. Previous work demonstrated that the presence of specific metals influence bacterial gene regulation in vitro, and it is similar to the one observed with the intracellular M. avium residing in macrophages [11].

To investigate whether metals have a role in the signaling mechanism and can stimulate the secretion of M. avium proteins, we exposed bacteria to metal mixture with concentrations that are encountered inside of macrophage vacuole. Forty-six unique proteins identified by mass spectrometry were exported in the vacuole model, while none of these proteins were secreted in the culture medium without the metals. Out of the 46 proteins, some are known effectors to be secreted inside macrophages, while others represent novel observation. For instance, MAV_1177 and MAV_1178 are hypothetical proteins containing the WXG motif. These two proteins are ESAT-like proteins and have significant homology to Rv2346c and Rv2347c of M. tuberculosis, respectively. In M. tuberculosis, Rv2346c (esx0) and Rv2347c (esxP) are associated with the ESAT-6-CFP-10 complex [21, 22]. By using a beta-lactamase FRET system we were able to confirm that 10 out of 10 tested proteins were in fact secreted and transported to the cytosol of the macrophage. MAV_4077, MAV_0502, MAV_4394, MAV_1419 and MAV_0628 are hypothetical proteins with no homology to M. tuberculosis proteins. MAV_4394 is a protein with signal sequence and a cutinase motif. Seven cutinase-like proteins have been identified in M. tuberculosis, yet their functional diversity and immunological properties vary significantly [23, 24]. Two cutinase-like proteins, Rv1984c and Rv3452, have been shown to be secreted by M. tuberculosis [25]. Their function was qualified as lipases and esterases.

Among identified secreted proteins, MAV_1356 hypothetical protein, with homology to the Rv1211 calmodulin-like protein in M. tuberculosis, has attracted our attention. It has been demonstrated in M. tuberculosis that this protein blocks the phagosome-lysosome fusion by inhibiting the entry of the cytosolic Ca++ inside the vacuole and disrupting the downstream signals in macrophage mediated by Ca++ Calmodulin [26, 27]. Our findings suggest that M. avium MAV_1356 interacts with cytoskeleton protein Annexin A1, a functional linker between actin filaments and phagosomes [28], and supports possibility that this protein might have similar function as the M. tuberculosis Rv1211. Annexins are well known to be present on phagosomes. Annexin A1 is a factor that binds to phagosomes in presence of calcium and facilitate the interaction of F-actin in the phagosome membrane. Downregulation of Annexin A1 gene expression results in impaired phagosome fusion with intracytoplasmatic structures [28]. MAV_1356 was shown to bind to S10A8_HUMAN (calprotectin), a phagocyte protein that is a calcium-binding protein and plays a number of roles in the intracellular environment, such as modulation of tubulin-dependent cytoskeleton.

The fact is that the slow replicating bacteria require an extended periods of time to synthesize de novo proteins (in M. avium it takes approximately 30 min, Bermudez, personal communication). One of the major questions in pathogenesis of slow replicating bacteria including M. avium is that during the first encounter with the host, in order for the pathogen to establish the successful infection, it would need to have some sets of proteins already pre-synthesized and ready to interact with the host cells. Our observation that metals do not seem to regulate gene expression per se, but stimulate the secretion of pre-synthesized proteins, supports ths idea. It also raises the question that at least some of the bacterial secretion mechanisms may be under the control of single elements. The implication would be that if one interferes with metal transport into the phagosome, it might impact secretion of effectors with consequent modulation in virulence. It is interesting that the majority of the identified secreted proteins belong to the ESX-3 region of M. avium chromosome. In M. tuberculosis the region is associated with the control of iron and zinc homeostasis [29].

There is always the concern that proteins identified in the supernatant were generated by bacteria lysis. While it is certainly true, in our phagosome model, M. avium is exposed just for short time periods (4h or 24h) and our experimental setting completely differs from studies where mycobacterial secreted proteins are identified in the filtrate of bacterial culture grown for several weeks [30, 31]. In addition, the conformational study verified that all the 10 proteins that we selected from the metal mix are in fact truly secreted in M. avium infected macrophages. Limited number (just 55) of proteins found by proteomic analysis also suggests that no bacterial lysis has occurred.

In summary, we described an in vitro system mimicking the phagosome environment and identified some sets of M. avium secreted proteins. This provides a new approach that is applicable to other intracellular organisms. The observation of several hypothetical proteins being secreted in the macrophage cytosol will require additional studies to identify the possible macrophage targets and function.

Conclusions

This study shows that an in vitro model representing the phagosome environment of the macrophage can be used to identify bacterial secreted protein relevant to infection. Although not all secreted proteins are identified, the model is quite efficient in unveil new secreted effectors.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Beth Chamblin for helping with the manuscript preparation. We also acknowledge the Mass Spectrometry Facility and the Center for Gene Research and Biotechnology, at Oregon State University, for their services and expertise.

Funding

The reported research was funded by a grant from NIH (AI043119).

Availability of the data and materials used in the research

The majority of the data is included in the manuscript. All the other material used in the reported research is available upon request. The raw data is also available. All the protein and gene sequences were obtained from public database.

Authors’ contributions

JJC perform experiments, wrote paper. LD performed experiments, wrote paper. RG performed experiments. SJR wrote paper. LMB performed experiments. LEB design studies, wrote paper, senior investigator. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No human subjects. Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA
(2)
Department of Microbiology, College of Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA

References

  1. McGarvey J, Bermudez LE. Pathogenesis of nontuberculous mycobacteria infections. Clin Chest Med. 2002;23(3):569–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Han XY, Tarrand JJ, Infante R, Jacobson KL, Truong M. Clinical significance and epidemiologic analyses of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare among patients without AIDS. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(9):4407–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Motamedi N, Danelishvili L, Bermudez LE. Identification of Mycobacterium avium genes associated with resistance to host antimicrobial peptides. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63(Pt 7):923–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Sturgill-Koszycki S, Schlesinger PH, Chakraborty P, Haddix PL, Collins HL, Fok AK, Allen RD, Gluck SL, Heuser J, Russell DG. Lack of acidification in Mycobacterium phagosomes produced by exclusion of the vesicular proton-ATPase. Science. 1994;263(5147):678–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Danelishvili L, Bermudez LE. Mycobacterium avium MAV_2941 mimics phosphoinositol-3-kinase to interfere with macrophage phagosome maturation. Microbes Infect. 2015;17(9):628–37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Kato A, Groisman EA, Howard Hughes Medical I. The PhoQ/PhoP regulatory network of Salmonella enterica. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;631:7–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wosten MM, Kox LF, Chamnongpol S, Soncini FC, Groisman EA. A signal transduction system that responds to extracellular iron. Cell. 2000;103(1):113–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Prost LR, Sanowar S, Miller SI. Salmonella sensing of anti-microbial mechanisms to promote survival within macrophages. Immunol Rev. 2007;219:55–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hueck CJ. Type III protein secretion systems in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(2):379–433.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Wagner D, Maser J, Lai B, Cai Z, Barry 3rd CE, Honer Zu Bentrup K, Russell DG, Bermudez LE. Elemental analysis of Mycobacterium avium-, Mycobacterium tuberculosis-, and Mycobacterium smegmatis-containing phagosomes indicates pathogen-induced microenvironments within the host cell’s endosomal system. J Immunol. 2005;174(3):1491–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Early J, Bermudez LE. Mimicry of the pathogenic mycobacterium vacuole in vitro elicits the bacterial intracellular phenotype, including early-onset macrophage death. Infect Immun. 2011;79(6):2412–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Cirillo DM, Valdivia RH, Monack DM, Falkow S. Macrophage-dependent induction of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system and its role in intracellular survival. Mol Microbiol. 1998;30(1):175–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Beare PA, Gilk SD, Larson CL, Hill J, Stead CM, Omsland A, Cockrell DC, Howe D, Voth DE, Heinzen RA. Dot/Icm type IVB secretion system requirements for Coxiella burnetii growth in human macrophages. MBio. 2011;2(4):e00175-11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Converse SE, Cox JS. A protein secretion pathway critical for Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence is conserved and functional in Mycobacterium smegmatis. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(4):1238–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Bardill JP, Miller JL, Vogel JP. IcmS-dependent translocation of SdeA into macrophages by the Legionella pneumophila type IV secretion system. Mol Microbiol. 2005;56(1):90–103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McNamara M, Danelishvili L, Bermudez LE. The Mycobacterium avium ESX-5 PPE protein, PPE25-MAV, interacts with an ESAT-6 family Protein, MAV_2921, and localizes to the bacterial surface. Microb Pathog. 2012;52(4):227–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. van Soolingen D, de Haas PE, Hermans PW, van Embden JD. DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Methods Enzymol. 1994;235:196–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. McGarvey JA, Bermudez LE. Phenotypic and genomic analyses of the Mycobacterium avium complex reveal differences in gastrointestinal invasion and genomic composition. Infect Immun. 2001;69(12):7242–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Babrak L, Danelishvili L, Rose SJ, Kornberg T, Bermudez LE. The environment of “Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis” microaggregates induces synthesis of small proteins associated with efficient infection of respiratory epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2015;83(2):625–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Danelishvili L, Wu M, Stang B, Harriff M, Cirillo SL, Cirillo JD, Bildfell R, Arbogast B, Bermudez LE. Identification of Mycobacterium avium pathogenicity island important for macrophage and amoeba infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(26):11038–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Lightbody KL, Ilghari D, Waters LC, Carey G, Bailey MA, Williamson RA, Renshaw PS, Carr MD. Molecular features governing the stability and specificity of functional complex formation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis CFP-10/ESAT-6 family proteins. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(25):17681–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Marmiesse M, Brodin P, Buchrieser C, Gutierrez C, Simoes N, Vincent V, Glaser P, Cole ST, Brosch R. Macro-array and bioinformatic analyses reveal mycobacterial ‘core’ genes, variation in the ESAT-6 gene family and new phylogenetic markers for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Microbiology. 2004;150(Pt 2):483–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. West NP, Wozniak TM, Valenzuela J, Feng CG, Sher A, Ribeiro JM, Britton WJ. Immunological diversity within a family of cutinase-like proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Vaccine. 2008;26(31):3853–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. West NP, Chow FM, Randall EJ, Wu J, Chen J, Ribeiro JM, Britton WJ. Cutinase-like proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: characterization of their variable enzymatic functions and active site identification. FASEB J. 2009;23(6):1694–704.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Schue M, Maurin D, Dhouib R, Bakala N'Goma JC, Delorme V, Lambeau G, Carriere F, Canaan S. Two cutinase-like proteins secreted by Mycobacterium tuberculosis show very different lipolytic activities reflecting their physiological function. FASEB J. 2010;24(6):1893–903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Malik ZA, Iyer SS, Kusner DJ. Mycobacterium tuberculosis phagosomes exhibit altered calmodulin-dependent signal transduction: contribution to inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion and intracellular survival in human macrophages. J Immunol. 2001;166(5):3392–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vergne I, Chua J, Deretic V. Tuberculosis toxin blocking phagosome maturation inhibits a novel Ca2+/calmodulin-PI3K hVPS34 cascade. J Exp Med. 2003;198(4):653–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Patel DM, Ahmad SF, Weiss DG, Gerke V, Kuznetsov SA. Annexin A1 is a new functional linker between actin filaments and phagosomes during phagocytosis. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(Pt 4):578–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Serafini A, Pisu D, Palu G, Rodriguez GM, Manganelli R. The ESX-3 secretion system is necessary for iron and zinc homeostasis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78351.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Sonnenberg MG, Belisle JT. Definition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture filtrate proteins by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, N-terminal amino acid sequencing, and electrospray mass spectrometry. Infect Immun. 1997;65(11):4515–24.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenkrands I, Andersen P. Preparation of culture filtrate proteins from mycobacterium tuberculosis. Methods Mol Med. 2001;54:205–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement