Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

amiA is a negative regulator of acetamidase expression in Mycobacterium smegmatis



The acetamidase of Mycobacterium smegmatis is a highly inducible enzyme. Expression of this enzyme is increased 100-fold when the substrate acetamide is present. The acetamidase gene is found immediately downstream of three open reading frames. Two of these are proposed to be involved in regulation.


We constructed a deletion mutant in one of the upstream ORFs (amiA). This mutant (Mad1) showed a constitutively high level of acetamidase expression. We identified four promoters in the upstream region using a β-galactosidase reporter gene. One of these (P2) was inducible in the wild-type, but was constitutively active in Mad1.


These results demonstrate that amiA encodes a negative regulatory protein which interacts with P2. Since amiA has homology to DNA-binding proteins, it is likely that it exerts the regulatory effect by binding to the promoter to prevent transcription.


The acetamidase enzyme of Mycobacterium smegmatis is a highly inducible enzyme [1]. In the presence of a suitable substrate, such as acetamide, the enzyme is expressed to a high level, forming up to 10% of the total protein. In the absence of an inducer the enzyme is expressed at a low (basal) level. Previous work has shown that both positive and negative control elements are involved in the regulation of the acetamidase. Induction occurs at the transcriptional level with increased amounts of acetamidase mRNA detectable after 1 hour [2]. Three open reading frames have been identified immediately upstream of the acetamidase gene (amiE in Figure 1) and these have been proposed to encode two regulatory genes (amiA and amiD) and a transport gene (amiS) [2, 3]. In addition, a third gene (amiC) which is divergently transcribed has been proposed to be a regulatory protein [3] (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Vector constructs. A: Arrangement of genes in the Mycobacterium smegmatis chromosome. amiA, amiC and amiD are proposed regulators, amiS encodes one component of a putative ABC transporter. amiE is the acetamidase gene. B: The two fragments used to generate the delivery vector for construction of the amiA deletion mutant. The resulting SalI deletion in the Mad1 strain is indicated which removes the majority of the amiA gene. C: The region used to complement the Mad1 mutant.

The lack of a suitable highly inducible promoter has hindered research in the genetics of mycobacteria. The acetamidase promoter is a good candidate for use in such studies, but it is important to understand its regulation in order to improve its utility.

The aim of this study was to determine what role one of the proposed regulatory genes, amiA, plays in the regulation of acetamidase expression. An unmarked deletion mutant was constructed which lacked the amiA gene and the effect on acetamidase expression was assessed. We also aimed to further define the promoter(s) responsible for acetamidase expression. Previous work with a reporter gene identified an inducible promoter within the region located approximately 1.5 kb upstream of the acetamidase itself [3], although the possibility of more than one promoter was not excluded. We used a β-galactosidase reporter gene to assay for promoter activity in the regions found immediately upstream of each gene. Four promoters were identified and their activity was measured in both the wild-type and amiA mutant strains.

Results and Discussion

Mad1 shows constitutively high level expression of the acetamidase

In order to begin to determine the role of the upstream genes in acetamidase expression, we constructed an unmarked amiAΔ mutant strain and then assessed the effect on AmiE expression by SDS-PAGE analysis of cell-free extracts (Figure 2). As has been previously shown [13], wild-type extracts showed clear induction of the 47 kDa acetamidase protein in the presence of acetamide. Mad1 showed a constitutively high level expression of AmiE. The identity of this protein was confirmed as the acetamidase by Western blotting (results not shown). Complementation with a functional copy of amiA (Mad1:pAGAN303) restored the ability of the cells to repress the acetamidase in the absence of an inducer. Since the acetamidase is not repressed in the absence of amiA, we conclude that it is a negative regulator of expression.

Figure 2
figure 2

Acetamidase expression in Mad1. Cell-free extracts were electrophoresed though a 10 % acrylamide gel. Lanes are 1: wild-type MM-S 2: Wild-type MM-AS 3: Mad1 MM-S 4: Mad1 MM-AS 5: Mad1/pAGAN303 MM-S 6: Mad1/pAGAN303 MM-AS 7: markers, size given in kDa. The acetamidase band at 47 kDa is indicated. MM-S: minimal media with succinate. MM-AS: minimal media with acetamide and succinate.

Multiple promoters are involved in acetamidase expression

Previous work has demonstrated that an inducible promoter was located in the 1.4 kb region approximately 1.5 kb upstream of amiE[3], although the possibility of more than one promoter was not excluded. In order to determine whether multiple promoters were involved in AmiE expression, we cloned the regions immediately upstream of each gene into a promoter probe vector carrying a β-galactosidase reporter gene (Table 1 and Figure 3). These constructs were first assayed for promoter activity in the wild-type strain. Four inserts with promoter activity were identified (Table 2). Pc drives the expression of amiC and is active at a low, but constitutive level. P2 upstream of amiD is a stronger promoter which shows a two-fold induction in the presence of acetamide (p < 0.012 using the students t-test). This is consistent with the previous results which showed that a two-fold inducible promoter was located in the 1.4 kb upstream region [3] (although the exact location of the promoter was not defined within this region). P1, upstream of amiA, had the highest promoter activity, but was constitutive. P3 is a very weak promoter found immediately upstream of amiE itself, which could allow the transcription of a monocistronic message encoding the acetamidase only, whereas P1 and P2 are more likely to be responsible for polycistronic messages. Northern blotting has previously shown that a 1.2 kb acetamidase transcript is indeed present (and induced) in the cells [3]. This could either arise from P3 or from processing of mRNA transcribed from P1 or P2.

Figure 3
figure 3

Promoter activity assays. The fragments assayed for promoter activity are shown, with arrows indicating the direction of the fragment realtive to the β-galactosidase gene. The pAGAN construct series numbers are given below each arrow. The four identified promoter fragments (Pc, P1, P2 and P3) are labelled and indicated by thicker arrows.

Table 1 Promoter assay constructs.
Table 2 Promoter activity assays.

Since all the fragments were small, they may not have contained all the regulatory sites normally present for each promoter. This may explain why we did not isolate a highly inducible promoter (only two-fold induction for P2) and the fact that the P3 promoter seemed to be very weak. Although we expected to find a highly inducible promoter, it is possible that one does not exist and that the induction of the acetamidase enzyme seen in the cell-free extracts may be a result of other mechanisms, such as an increase in mRNA stability.

There is a predicted consensus promoter sequence in the P2 region which has both the -10 and -35 boxes of classical promoters [2]. None of the other promoter fragments show any similarity to previously identified promoter consensus sequences. Mycobacterial promoters often have a different structure from the typical Escherichia coli promoter [4, 5], so this is not surprising. In addition, regulated promoters often do not have strong consensus sequences and rely on the presence of other regulatory or accessory proteins to recruit RNA polymerase and initiate transcription.

Promoter activity in Mad1

Three of the promoters were assayed for activity in the amiA deletion strain (Figure 3 and Table 2). P1 promoter activity was unaffected (Table 2). P2 activity was unchanged under induced conditions, but was significantly higher in the uninduced conditions (p < 0.02). The activity of Pc was also affected and was higher under both conditions (p < 0.03). Thus AmiA appears to repress both Pc and P2 promoters.

The role of AmiA

Taken together the data suggest that AmiA acts to repress the P2 promoter and thus prevent expression of the acetamidase. Since AmiA shows homology to the MarA DNA-binding group of regulatory proteins, it seems likely that it would exert this effect by binding to the P2 promoter region and preventing transcription.


We have demonstrated that acetamidase expression is derepressed in an amiA deletion mutant and that of four promoters identified, two show increased activity in this strain. In light of this evidence we propose the following model. In the absence of acetamide, AmiA binds to the P2 promoter region and prevents transcription of the three genes downstream. The small basal level of acetamidase expression arises from P2 leakage, or from the P3 promoter. AmiA may also bind to the Pc promoter and reduce expression of AmiC. In the presence of acetamide, AmiA no longer binds to the P2 promoter region and transcription can then proceed at a higher level. In the latter case, it is probable that AmiC, which has a probable acetamide-binding domain [6], binds to both acetamide and AmiA thereby preventing its interaction with the promoters.

Although the inducible acetamidase system has been used for genetic manipulation of mycobacteria [79], including over-expression of heterologous proteins, the system is far from ideal. Thus the characterisation of the role of amiA is an important step towards our understanding of the system and will allow the construction of more sophisticated systems in the future.

Material and Methods


M. smegmatis was grown in Lemco medium (5 g/L Lemco powder, 5 g/L NaCl, 10 g/L Bacto peptone) with 0.05 % Tween 80 (liquid) or 15 g/L Bacto agar (solid). Kanamycin was added to 20 μg/ml, hygromycin to 100 μg/ml, gentamicin to 10 μg/ml and sucrose to 5% where appropriate. Minimal media [2] contained 0.05% Tween 80 and carbon sources (acetamide or succinate) at 0.02%.

Construction of deletion mutant strain Mad1

A suicide (non-replicating) delivery vector (pURR541) was constructed using a rapid cloning system [10]. First, the 1.4 kb Bam HI-Sal I and 0.5 kb Sal I-Pst I fragments indicated in Figure 1 were cloned into the manipulation vector p2NIL. The sacB and hyg marker genes were then cloned in as a Pac I fragment from pGOAL13 [10]; these confer sucrose sensitivity and hygromycin resistance respectively. The final delivery vector also had a kanamycin resistance gene. M. smegmatis Mad1 was constructed using a two-step strategy. The delivery vector pURR541 was electroporated [11] into M. smegmatis mc2155 and single crossovers selected on hygromycin, kanamycin plates. One such transformant was streaked out to allow the second recombination event to occur. Double crossovers were identified by selecting for sucrose resistance and screening for kanamycin and hygromycin sensitivity. Southern blotting was used to determine which of the double crossovers had the wild-type genotype restored and which had the amiA deletion in the chromosome.

Complementation of Mad1

The complementing vector pAGAN303 was constructed by PCR-amplifying the amiA gene (Figure 1) using primers which were designed to contain Eco RI restriction sites. The PCR fragment was cloned as an Eco RI fragment into integrating vector pINT3 which carries the mycobacteriophage L5 integrase and attachment sites and a gentamicin resistance gene. Mad1 was electroporated with this plasmid and transformants selected on gentamicin.

Preparation of cell-free extracts

Strains were grown overnight in 5 ml Lemco broth and used to inoculate 100 ml of minimal media plus either acetamide and succinate (MM-AS) or succinate alone (MM-S) and incubated for 24 hours. Bacteria were harvested, washed and resuspended in 1 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8. An equal volume of 0.1 mm glass beads were added and the suspensions subjected to 2 × 1 min pulses in the MiniBead Beater (Biospec Products). Cell debris was removed by spinning at 13000 g for 5 min.

Promoter activity assays

Promoter constructs (Table 1 and Figure 3) were electroporated into M. smegmatis and transformants selected with kanamycin. For each construct three transformants were grown up in 5 ml Lemco and used to inoculate 5 ml of MM-AS or MM-S. Cultures were incubated for 24, harvested, washed once and resuspended in 1 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl pH8. Cell lysates were prepared by sonication with a 3 mm microprobe at 20% amplitude for 30 seconds using an Ultrasonic Processor (Sonics and Material). β-galactosidase activity was measured as previously described [12].


  1. Draper P: The aliphatic acylamide amidohydrolase of Mycobacterium smegmatis: its inducible nature and relation to acyl-transfer to hydroxylamine. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1967, 46: 111-123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahenthiralingam E, Draper P, Davis EO, Colston MJ: Cloning and sequencing of the gene which encodes the highly inducible acetamidase of Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1993, 139: 575-583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parish T, Mahenthiralingam E, Draper P, Davis EO, Colston MJ: Regulation of the inducible acetamidase gene of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Microbiol. 1997, 143: 2267-2276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bashyam MD, Kaushal D, Dasgupta SK, Tyagi AK: A study of the mycobacterial transcriptional apparatus: Identification of novel features in promoter elements. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 4847-4853.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulder MA, Zappe H, Steyn LM: Mycobacterial promoters. Tubercle and Lung Disease. 1997, 78: 211-223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mills J, Wyborn NR, Greenwood JA, Williams SG, Jones CW: Characterisation of a binding-protein-dependent, active transport system for short-chain amides and urea in the methylotrophic bacterium Methylophilus methylotrophus. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 251: 45-53. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2510045.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Payton M, Auty R, Delgoda R, Everett M, Sim E: Cloning and characterization of arylamine N-acetyltransferase genes from Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Increased expression results in isoniazid resistance. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 1343-1347.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Triccas JA, Parish T, Britton WJ, Gicquel B: An inducible expression system permitting the efficient purification of a recombinant antigen from Mycobacterium smegmatis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998, 167: 151-156. 10.1016/S0378-1097(98)00381-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Manabe YC, Chen JM, Ko CG, Chen P, Bishai WR: Conditional sigma factor expression, using the inducible acetamidase promoter, reveals that the Mycobacterium tuberculosis sigF gene modulates expression of the 16-kilodalton alpha-crystallin homologue. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 7629-7633.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parish T, Stoker NG: Use of a flexible cassette method to generate a double unmarked Mycobacterium tuberculosis tlyA plcABC mutant by gene replacement. Microbiol,. 2000, 146: 1969-1975.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Parish T, Stoker NG: Electroporation of mycobacteria. In: Mycobacteria Protocols (Edited by Parish T, Stoker NG) Totowa, Humana Press. 1998, 129-144.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller JH: Assay of beta-galactosidase activity. In: Experiments in Molecular Genetics (Edited by New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 1972, 352-355.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Timm J, Lim EM, Gicquel B: Escherichia coli – mycobacteria shuttle vectors for operon and gene fusions to lacZ: The pJEM series. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176: 6749-6753.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


TP was partly funded by the GlaxoSmithKline Action TB Initiative. Part of this work was carried out as part of an MSc project by JT at the University of Westminster.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanya Parish.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parish, T., Turner, J. & Stoker, N.G. amiA is a negative regulator of acetamidase expression in Mycobacterium smegmatis. BMC Microbiol 1, 19 (2001).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: