Skip to main content
Download PDF

Assessment of probiotic and technological properties of Bacillus spp. isolated from Burkinabe Soumbala

BMC Microbiology volume 22, Article number: 228 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Soumbala is a highly loved alkaline traditional fermented food condiment in Burkina Faso. It harbors various microbiota dominated by fermentative Bacillus spp. as functional microorganism with little confirmed health-promoting properties.

Methods

The present study aimed to evaluate six Bacillus strains previously isolated and identified from soumbala. These strains were selected as presumptively safe bacteria for probiotic and technological characteristics. These strains were assessed for in vitro probiotic criteria (tolerance to acidic pH, gastric juice, 0.3% (m/v) bile salts, intestinal juice and 0.4% (w/v) phenol, cell surface hydrophobicity, auto-aggregation capacity, antimicrobial activity against foodborne pathogens, antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm production) and technological properties, including protease, amylase, lipase, and tannase activity, as well as poly-γ-glutamic acid (PGA) production and thermo-tolerance.

Results

All tested Bacillus strains (B54, F20, F24, F21, F26 and F44) presented variable relevant probiotic properties (good tolerance to pH 2 and pH 4, gastric juice, bile salts, intestinal juice and phenol), with marked differences in hydrophobicity and auto-aggregation capacity ranging from 73.62—94.71% and 49.35—92.30%, respectively. They exhibited a broad spectrum of activity against foodborne pathogens depending on target pathogen, with the highest activity exhibited by strain F20 (29.52 mm) against B. cereus 39 (p <

 0.001). They also showed good biofilm production as well as variable hydrolytic enzyme activities, including protease (43.00—60.67 mm), amylase (22.59—49.55 mm), lipase (20.02—24.57 mm), and tannase (0—10.67 mm). All tested Bacillus strains tolerated temperature up to 50 °C, while only strains F26 and F44 showed the best PGA production.

Conclusion

Overall, the tested cultures exhibiting potential probiotic and technological characteristics; particularly B. cereus F20, B. benzoevorans F21, B. cabrialessi F26, and B. tequilensis F44 could be a source of probiotic-starters of commercial interest in the production of high-quality soumbala.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

West African alkaline fermented food condiments, mainly produced by spontaneous fermentation of legumes, protein-rich seeds of cultivated and wild plant species, play major roles in the diet, socio-economic and cultural lifestyle of millions of local populations [1, 2]. Representing 80% of word food needs, fermented foods currently enjoy growing interests as functional foods [1]. Among a diversity of fermented condiments, soumbala is a product of the traditional alkaline fermention of Parkia biglobosa seeds. It is successful and widely used condiment in Burkina Faso and has various names depending on the ethnicity of local producer in other West African countries [3,4,5]. Soumbala is culturally accepted and serves as flavoring in soups, stews, spaghetti, other pastas, fried rice and chicken and constitutes a significant source of low-cost protein [3,4,5]. It is considered to be health-promoting, and its consumption is believed and advised as a means to prevent and/or to fight malnutrition, cardiovascular diseases among others [3, 5]. Despite rapidly changing food habits brought about by urbanization, this food seasoning has continued to enjoy sustained and growing interest, due to local preferences and increasing valorization and promotion of local foods (based on existing raw materials) as a means of fostering food security, as recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization. Several studies have been performed in different aspects of this food seasoning, with the main prospect being the selection of technologically relevant starter cultures for the optimization of its controlled production. Results revealed that fermentation process of soumbala relies on indigenous microbiota predominated by Bacillus spp., including B. subtilis, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. licheniformis, B. pumilus, B. megaterium, B. sphaericus, B. cereus, B. badius and B. fusiformis [3, 6, 7]. These pre-dominant fermentative bacteria are responsible for natural bioconversion of complex food molecules, flavor (taste, texture, and aroma) development, production of antimicrobial compounds that impact shelf-life and safety, and in some instances, may confer host-beneficial health effects beyond basic nutrition. Some of these Bacillus strains, mainly B. subtilis, are recognized as technologically relevant and safe microorganisms of West African traditional alkaline fermented seed condiments [1]. Interestingly, some B. subtilis strains, isolated from soumbala, bikalga (fermented seeds of H. sabdariffa) and maari (fermented seeds of A. digitata), could be used as starter cultures for the production of high-quality soumbala [8]. In addition, in our previous study we highlighted that some presumptively safe Bacillus spp. identified by 16S RNA sequencing, could serve as potential probiotic-starter cultures [7]. However, few studies have been done on the probiotic functional properties / attributes of the relevant Bacillus strains from the African traditional fermented food condiments [9]. Nevertheless, some Bacillus strains are considered as probiotics, i.e.living microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit to the host [10]. Their potential benefits include modulation of immune system, antimicrobial activities against foodborne pathogens, reduction of cardio-vascular disease, lowering of serum cholesterol level, prevention of intestinal disorders, such as diarrhea or lactose intolerance, and of antibody-associated diarrhea [11, 12]. Probiotics have recently become available as novel foods or dietary supplements for human nutrition and as feed supplements for animal nutrition [13]. Thus, some Bacillus strains have been classified as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) bacteria for use as foods or dietary supplements for human nutrition and as feed supplements for animal nutrition [13]. In the case of soumbala, to the best of our knowledge, no studies are available on functional properties of the organisms responsible for fermentation. Detailed understanding of fermentative microbiota and their unique technological and probiotic functional properties are fundamental in developing products such as soumbala. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the probiotic attributes of presumptively safe Bacillus spp. strains isolated from soumbala and to advance better understanding of their role in the fermentation process for high-quality soumbala production.

Materials and methods

Microorganisms

Six Bacillus strains earlier isolated in our laboratory (LABIOTAN, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso) as active agents in the traditional fermentation of soumbala and identified through molecular biology techniques were used. These Bacillus strains were identified as B. dakarensis (B54), B. cereus (F20), B. benzoevorans (F21), B. subtilis (F24), B. cabrialesii (F26) and B. tequilensis (F44), with similarity / E-score of 97.51%, 100%, 97.99%, 91.58%, 100% and 97.86%, respectively in EzBioCloudFootnote 1 [7]. All these organisms were also found to be non-hemolytic and susceptible to antibiotics currently used as medicine and then, selected as non-pathogenic strains [7]. These strains were maintained on nutrient agar slants at 4 °C prior to use. For probiotic and technology properties characterization, sterile Brain Hearth Infusion (BHI) broth was inoculated with strains and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, referred to in this study as "24 h culture" or "overnight culture".

Survival in different media similar to gastrointestinal tract conditions

The survival rate (SR) of the Bacillus strains was assessed under different conditions in media, these conditions being similar to that of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). A 10% (v/v) aliquot of each Bacillus culture grown overnight in BHI broth was inoculated into 10 mL of freshly prepared BHI broth (required pH 2 or 4). A 0.1 mL of each sample was collected before (T0 = 0 h) and after required incubation time (T1 ≠ 0 h) for each test and spread onto Müller Hinton (MH) agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h.

Then, viable cells were enumerated. The relative SR of the organisms was calculated with the following formula [14]: \(SR/viability=\mathrm{NT}1/NT0 x 100\), with NT1 = log CFU after switching to the relevant medium at t ≠ 0 h and NT0 = log CFU at t = 0 h.

pH tolerance

An aliquot (1 mL) of each Bacillus culture grown overnight in BHI was inoculated into 10 mL nutrient broth at pH 2 and 4, respectively. A 0.1 mL of each sample was collected at T0 = 0 h and after incubation for 4 h (T1), at 37 °C. Collected samples were spread onto MH agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h [15]; then, viable cells were enumerated. The relative survival rate of the organisms was calculated using the same formula above.

Gastric juice tolerance

An aliquot (1 mL) of each Bacillus culture grown overnight in BHI was inoculated into 10 mL gastric juice (2 g/L NaCl, 3.2 g/L pepsin,7 mL of 0.2 M HCl, 993 mL distilled water and pH 2) sterilized by filtration using 0.22 µm Millipore membrane filter (Easy FlowTM Filter 0.22 µm Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Incubation was done at 37 °C for 2 h under agitation at 150 rpm. An aliquot (0.1 mL) of each culture was collected before (T0 = 0 h) and after incubation (T1 = 2 h) and spread onto MH agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h [15]. Viable cells were enumerated; then, viability of the organisms was calculated with the same formula above.

Bile salts tolerance

Bile salts tolerance of the Bacillus strains was determined using a slight modification of the method of Unban et al. [15]. An aliquot (1 mL) of each Bacillus culture grown overnight in BHI broth was incubated in 10 mL of freshly prepared BHI broth containing 0.3% (w/v) bile salts at 37 °C for 3 h under 150 rpm agitation. Samples were collected before (T0 = 0 h) and after (T1 = 3 h) incubation and spread onto MH agar plates using a glass rod, then, incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, after which viable cells were counted. The viability of the organisms in the BHI broth containing 0.3% bile salts was calculated using the same formula above.

Intestinal juice tolerance

An aliquot (1 mL) of overnight culture of each Bacillus strain was inoculated into 10 mL intestinal juice (6.8 g / L KH2PO4 in 250 mL distilled water, 77 mL 0.2 N NaOH, 10 g pancreatin in 500 mL distilled water, make up to 1000 mL with distilled water, pH adjusted to 6.8) sterilized by filtration through a 0.22 µm Millipore membrane filter (Easy FlowTM Filter 0.22 µm Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The cultures were incubated under agitation at 150 rpm at 37 °C for 6 h. Then, samples were collected and spread onto MH agar plates using a glass rod, incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, after which viable cells were counted. The viability of the organisms was calculated as described above.

Phenol resistance

The survival of the Bacillus strains to the action of toxic metabolites produced during digestion was determined according to the method described by Kiliç et al. [16]. Thus, 1 mL overnight culture of each Bacillus strain was inoculated with 10 mL sterile nutrient broth supplemented with 0.4% (w/v) phenol. Incubation was done at 37 °C for 24 h. Phenol resistance was determined according to the relationship of Burgain [14].

Auto-aggregation

Auto-aggregation capacity of the Bacillus strains was determined according to a modified method of Borah et al. [17] as follows: bacterial cells were collected from 10 mL overnight culture by centrifugation at 10,000 xg for 10 min at 4 °C. The resulting cell pellets were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) and re-suspended in 5 mL of the same buffer at 108 CFU / mL. An aliquot (3 mL) of the suspension was vortexed for 10 s and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The absorbance of the supernatant before incubation (A0h) and after 2 h incubation (A2h) was measured at 600 nm using a UV / visible spectrophotometer. Auto-aggregation (A) was expressed using the following equation: A (%) = [(1 – (A2h/A0h)] × 100.

Cell surface hydrophobicity

The hydrophobicity of the cell surface of the Bacillus strains was determined, in terms of cell's ability to adhere to hydrocarbon solvents (ACS), according to García-Hernández et al. [18]. A 24 h culture at 37 °C was centrifuged at 10,000 xg for 10 min at 4 °C. The cells were washed twice with PBS (pH 7.2), and re-suspended in 2 mL of PBS. Its absorbance was read at 600 nm and this was used as the value of A0h to determine hydrophobicity in percentage. Cell suspension was mixed with equal volume of toluene, chosen as a non-polar solvent because it reflects the hydrophobicity of the cell surface [19, 20], then vortexed for 5 min. The mixture was allowed to separate into two phases at 37 °C for 1 h. The organic phase has been removed. Then, the absorbance of the aqueous phase was measured at 600 nm and used as the value of A1h. The hydrophobicity of the cell surface (H) or percentage of ACS was determined by the following formula: H / ACS (%) = [1—(A1/A0)] × 100. Strains with H / ACS (%) more than 50% were considered hydrophobic [15].

Antimicrobial activity

Antimicrobial activity was evaluated against 19 pathogenic microorganisms using a cut well diffusion assay [21, 22] with some modification. These pathogens included 15 bacteria (Bacillus subtilis subp subtilis ATCC 6051, Bacillus subtilis subp spizizenii, Bacillus cereus 39, Bacillus cereus LMG 13,569, Escherichia coli 12, Staphylococcus aureus CTI, Staphylococcus aureus O10, Staphylococcus aureus toxin (A + B), Salmonella enteritidis P167807, Shigella dysenteria 370, Pseudomonas aeruginosa CN, Proteus vulgaricus, Listeria monocytogenes NTCT983, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19,433, and Yersinia enterocolitica BT3) and 4 fungal strains (Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae KVL 013) obtained from the stock culture of Département Technologie Alimentaire (DTA)/IRSAT. Each bacterium was grown onto BHI agar while fungal stains were grown onto potato dextrose agar (PDA). One to two colony of overnight-grown culture of each pathogen was picked up with sterile Pasteur pipette and suspended in 5 mL of physiologic saline to obtain 1.5 × 108 UFC/mL (0.5 McFarland standard). An aliquot (0.1 mL) of each pathogen suspension was spread seeded onto MH agar plates (for bacteria strains) and PDA plates (for fungal strains). Wells (5 mm) were punched in the agar plates using a sterile borer. Cell free supernatant (CFS) of each Bacillus strain was collected from a 24 h culture by centrifugation at 12,000 xg for 15 min at 4 °C followed by filtration through a 0.22 µm Millipore membrane filter (Easy FlowTM Filter 0.22 µm Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Then, 50 µL aliquots of these CFS were dispensed in separate wells. The agar plates were kept at 4 °C to allow the supernatants diffuse into the agar. They were then incubated in duplicate in inverted position at 37 °C for 24–48 h (for bacteria strains) and normal position at 30 °C for 72 h (for fungal strains). The diameter of the inhibition zones around the wells was measured using a caliper.

Biofilm production / adhesion test

The ability of Bacillus strains to form biofilms on food matrices or other environments was assessed as follows in two ways:

  • An aliquot (10 µL) of overnight-culture of each Bacillus strain was inoculated into 1 mL of mannitol-casein broth (50% (w/v) each distributed in Eppendorf tubes. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, the bacterial inoculate were emptied and the tubes filled with a 2% (v/v) Lugol solution and kept for 30 min. Afterwards, the solution was then drained and the tubes were rinsed with tap water. The observation of a blue ring on the inner wall of the tube reflects the mediated formation of biofilms. The size and intensity of this ring was assessed on a scale [23].

  • The Bacillus strains were grown in Luria Bertania broth (LB) (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract and 5 g/L NaCl) at 37 °C for 24 h. Inocula of 2 µL and 15 µL of each strain were streaked onto LBGM agar (LB broth supplemented with 1% (v/v) glycerol; 0.1 mM MnSO4 and 1.5% agar) and inoculated into 15 mL of LBGM broth (LB broth supplemented with 1% (v/v) glycerol and 0.1 mM MnSO4) dispensed into Petri dishes, respectively. Incubation was done at 37 °C for 72 h (LBGM agar) and 24—48 h (LBGM broth). The appearance of viscous and mucoid colonies on LBGM agar or the formation of films at the LBGM broth-air interface indicate the formation of biofilms by the tested strain [24].

Screening for technological properties

Screening of tested Bacillus strains for their technological properties focused on their hydrolytic enzyme activities, including protease, lipase, amylase, and tannase, and poly-γ-glutamic acid (PGA) production. The thermotolerance was also evaluated.

Protease activity

The protease activity of Bacillus strains was evaluated by the spot method, using nutrient agar supplemented with 10% (v/v) skimmed milk. The appearance of transparent halos around the spots indicated proteolysis after 24 h incubation at 37 °C [25].

Amylase activity

Amylase activity of Bacillus strains was evaluated by spot method, using nutrient agar supplemented with 2% (w/v) potato starch. Incubation was done at 37 °C for 24 h. Bacterial colonies grown on the agar were sprayed with Lugol solution and kept for about 15 min. The appearance of a clear halo around the colonies indicates amylase activity [26].

Lipase activity

Lipase activity of the Bacillus strains was evaluated by spot method, using nutrient agar supplemented with 3% (v/v) Cocos nucifera oil. The appearance of clear halos around the colonies indicates lipolysis after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C [27].

Tannase activity

Tannic acid (hydrolysable tannin) degradation was evaluated according to a modified method of Unban et al. [15]. Each strain was plated in spot on modified tannic acid agar consisting of BHI broth, 0.5% (w/v) yeast extract and 3% (w/v) agar. A 5 mL volume of filter-sterilized 2% (w/v) tannic acid was transferred to the agar surface for 15 min and the excess tannic acid solution was removed by aspiration with a sterile syringe. The opaque agar surface was washed three times with PBS solution (pH 7.2) to remove the tannic acid residue, then, an inoculum of each strain was spotted on the tannic agar surface. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 to 72 h, the appearance of a clear halo around the bacterial colony indicates the use of tannins [15, 28].

Poly-gamma-glutamic acid (PGA) production

The detection of PGA production by Bacillus strains was performed on ME medium consisting of L-glutamic acid (20 g/L), citric acid (12 g/L), glycerol (80 g/L), NH4Cl (7 g/L), MgSO4. 7H2O (0.5 g/L), FeCl3.6H2O (0.04 g/L), K2HPO4 (0.5 g/L), CaCl2.2H2O (0.15 g/L), MnSO4.H2O (0.04 g/L) and agar (15 g/L) [29]. A 24 h culture of each strain in LB broth was plated on ME agar and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h. After incubation, the development of highly viscous and mucous colonies reflects the production of PGA by the strain [29, 30].

Thermotolerance

A 24 h colony of each Bacillus strain was inoculated into 5 mL of the nutrient broth. The initial incubation was done at 45 °C for 24 h to observe growth by turbidity of the medium. After incubation, the strains that resisted the previous temperature were selected and tested at 50 °C and then at 55 °C [31]

Statistical analyses

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s mean comparison test were performed to determine significant difference (p < 0.05) in all activity test results using the R software version 3.6.3. The p-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of replicates.

Results

Survivability of Bacillus cultures in artificial media similar to gastrointestinal tract

Low pH tolerance

Bacillus cereus F20 was found to be the most acid-tolerant strain exhibiting 49.56% survivability after 3 h of incubation at pH 2, whereas B. cabrialesii F26 exhibited 44.40% survivability (Table 1). While at pH 4, B. cabrialesii F26 and B. subtilis F24 exhibited the highest (79.21%) and the lowest (55.90%) survival rates, respectively, after the incubation period (3 h).

Table 1 Relative survival rates of Bacillus strains in artificial media similar to GIT
Full size table

Gastric juice tolerance

The Bacillus cultures showed relative survival rates range of 20.55–44.10% after exposure to gastric juice for 3 h (Table 1), with B. cereus F20 showing the highest survival rate while B. tequilensis F44 showed least survival rate.

Bile salts tolerance test

Results showed that B. cereus F20 was highly bile tolerant, maintaining 87.91% viability while B. subtilis F24 maintained 52.69% viability after 3 h incubation in BHI containing 0.3% (w/v) bile salts (Table 1).

Phenol tolerance

In BHI broth containing 0.4% phenol, B. cabrialesii F26 displayed the highest viability / survivability (88%) while B. dakarensis B54 demonstrated lowest viability (52.90%) after 24 h of incubation (Table 1).

Cell surface hydrophobicity and Auto-aggregation

Bacillus tequilensis F44 showed the highest surface hydrophobicity (95.33%) and B. dakarensis B54 had the lowest value (73.62%). Regarding auto-aggregation ability, a marked difference in adhesion from 73.62 to 95.3% was observed among all Bacillus strains tested ( Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Hydrophobicity and auto-aggregation ability (%) of the studied Bacillus strains with toluene. Values with different letters indicate significant differences by Tukey's test (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Antimicrobial activity

The antimicrobial activity of the neutralized cell-free crude supernatant (pH 7.0) of all Bacillus strains was evaluated against 19 pathogenic and potentially microorganisms. The antimicrobial spectrum obtained varied according to the test Bacillus strain (Table 2). Thus, B. benzoevorans F21 showed the broadest antimicrobial spectrum against 10 bacteria out of the 19 pathogens while B. cereus F20 exhibited the largest inhibition diameter (29.52 mm) against B. cereus 39 with a very high significant difference (p ≤ 0.0001). However, all fungal strains in addition to 5 bacterial strains (E. coli 12, S. aureus O10, S. dysenteria 370, S. enteridis and Y. enterocolitica BT3) were resistant to the inhibitory effect of the crude supernatant of all Bacillus strains studied.

Table 2 Antimicrobial activities of Bacillus isolates
Full size table

Regarding antibiotic susceptibility, the results of our previous study showed that all tested Bacillus strains were susceptible to almost all antibiotics except bacitracin for which they were all resistant. Bacillus benzoevorans F21 and B. cereus F20 (Fig. 2) were the most sensitive to imipenem (38.80 ± 1.57 mm and 38.04 ± 1.73 mm, respectively) while B. dakarensis B54 displayed the weakest sensitivity to bacitracin (11.00 ± 0.63 mm) [7]

Fig. 2
figure 2

Antibiotic susceptibility of B. cereus F20

Full size image

Detection of biofilm formation

Bacillus species generally produce biofilms under harsh living conditions. This biofilm production depends on the microorganism and the culture conditions. All Bacillus strains tested in this study were able to produce different biofilm forms of varying thickness and density on the surface of the LBGM medium and on the inner wall of the Eppendorf tubes. Bacillus cabrialesii F26, and B. tequilensis F44 showed the best biofilm production at the LBGM broth-air interface (Fig. 3) and on the inner wall of the Eppendorf tube.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Production of biofilm as a veil on the surface of LBGM by B. cabrialesii F26 and B. tequilensis F44. Legend: A = Control, B = B. cabrialesii F26 and C = B. tequilensis F44

Full size image

Technological properties: Protease, amylase, lipase, tannase, and PGA production and thermotolerance

The occurrence of certain key hydrolytic enzymes activities including protease, lipase and amylase were found in all Bacillus strains tested. The activity diameters obtained following the expression of these enzymes varied among strains (Table 3). Thus, all Bacillus strains expressed various protease, amylase, lipase, and tannase activity. The highest proteolytic, amylolytic, and lipolytic activities were observed with B. benzoevorans F21 (60.675 mm, Fig. 4A), B. cereus F20 (49.55 mm, Fig. 4B), and B. benzoevorans F21 (24.57 mm) and B. subtilis F24 (24.57 mm), while the lowest activities were observed with B. dakarensis B54 (43.00), B. subtilis F24 (22.59 mm) and B. tequilensis F44 (20.025 mm), respectively. For tannase production the entire Bacillus strains where able to grow on the tannic acid medium. However, only B. cabrialesii F26 and B. tequilensis F44 showed (the lowest (09.87 mm) and highest (10.67 mm)) tannase activity diameter, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 Enzymatic activity of Bacillus strains
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Enzymatic activity of the studied Bacillus strains. Legend: A = protease activity of B. benzoevorans F21, B = amylase activity of B. cereus F20

Full size image

Out of the 6 Bacillus strains tested, 3 strains, i.e., B. subtilis F24, B. cabrialesii F26 and B. tequilensis F44 were capable of producing PGA and this was evidenced by the shape of their highly viscous and mucous colonies on the ME (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Production of PGA by Bacillus strains. Legend: A = B. cabrialesii F26 and B = B. tequilensis F44

Full size image

Discussion

This study assessed for the first time the probiotic potential of Bacillus strains isolated from soumbala, a very prized food condiment. This flavoring agent production is mainly assured by Bacillus species responsible of macromolecules bioconversion into assimilable metabolites and production of biomolecules with a crucial role on the organoleptic (including flavor) and nutritional quality, and bioconservation of product with functional properties [3, 6, 7].

Indeed, the recognized GRAS status of several Bacillus strains increased their interest as probiotic-starter cultures for the development of functional foods having probiotic benefit on consumers. However, before probiotic strains are able to exert their beneficial effects in the host gut, they need to remain alive during both ingestion and in the harsh environments of the gastrointestinal tract, which include the acidic condition of the stomach. The survivability of Bacillus spp. in the gastric juice depends on their ability to tolerate low pH, which is an important probiotic characteristic [20, 32]. It was observed that all Bacillus cultures were able to withstand acidic conditions (Table 1). Similar heterogeneity in response to acidic environments was previously reported within the Bacillus species. Elsewhere, after exposure to low pH solution (pH 2.0, and 4.0) for 3 h, probiotic Bacillus strains, MKSK-E1, MKSK-J1, and MKSK-M1 showed relative survival rates of 93.1%, 91.9%, and 96.0%, respectively [33]. Bacillus licheniformis Me1, B. flexus Hk1, and B. subtilis Bn1 were also found to present survival rates ≥ 80% at pH 3 [32] higher than our current finding. Maintaining viability after exposure to the acidic environment for 3 h implies the strain’s ability to favorably readjust in the acid-stressed environment and resume growth. This could be by a combination of genetic and physiological mechanisms, common with acidophilic microorganisms. Acid tolerant strains are also most likely to benefit from acid protection effect of high protein and high fat diets and thus confer health benefit on consumers.

In gastric juice, all Bacillus strains showed survival rates ranging from 20.55—to 44.10% after exposure for 3 h (Table 1). This is less than that reported by Lee et al. [33] for probiotic Bacillus strains, MKSK-E1 (93.1%), MKSK-J1 (91.9%) and MKSK-M1 (96.0%) after exposure to 0.1% pepsin solution (pH 2.0) for 3 h. Acid stability is an important parameter and a basis for the selection of a probiotic strain since acid resistance is an indication of the potential of the probiotic strain to survive the gastric and duodenal juices [34].

Bacteria growth is inhibited by bile which enters through the duodenal section of the small intestine; this is possible as the bacteria cell membrane is made up of lipids and fatty acids which are sensitive to bile salts [9]. However, resistance to these substances is of great importance in survival and growth of bacteria in the intestinal tract and thus it is a pre-requisite for the selection of probiotic strains [32, 34]. Bile tolerance studies are mostly carried out using 0.3% oxgal bile solution because of its similarity to human bile juice [35] and also because 0.3% is considered to be a crucial concentration to evaluate a bile-tolerant probiotic [36]. It was observed that, B. cereus F20, B. benzoevorans F21, B. cabrialesii F26, B. tequilensis F44 and B. dakarensis B54 were tolerant to 0.3% oxgal bile, while B. subtilis F24 was weakly tolerant, suggesting that all these Bacillus strains are member of "tolerant" group. This result is in agreement with those observed with others Bacillus spp. [32, 37]. However, the survival rate obtained in the present study are lower than those reported by Kavitha et al. [20] on Bacillus strain FC6 which viability was 91.62%, after 3 h exposure to 1% (m/v) bile salts. The current findings are an indication that these bacteria when consumed with the fermented food have the potential to survive the acid-and bile-rich environments, a pre-requisite necessary to reach and survive in the intestinal gut in order to confer its benefits to the host [9].

Phenols are toxic metabolites which are released during digestion by bacterial deamination of some aromatic amino acids derived from dietary and endogenous proteins. These compounds are known to have bacteriostatic properties [38]. In contrast to the high phenol (0.4%) resistance, which was previously reported for B. cereus strains [9], the Bacillus spp. strains in this study were highly sensitive towards this compound, and this, despite the fact that these bacteria are physiologically closely related. Our results on the phenol resistance of Bacillus strains suggest that these are generally moderately tolerant. Hence, bacteria tolerant to phenols may have more chances of survival than those which are not [38], meaning that a potential probiotic strain should tolerate the limited amounts of phenols in the gastrointestinal tract.

Hydrophobicity is an important feature which aids the attachment of probiotic microorganisms to the intestinal epithelium [39]. Probiotic microorganisms, through their adhesion capability, can prevent pathogens access by steric interactions or specific blockage of cell receptors [20]. The tested Bacillus strains have presented variably high hydrophobicity and auto-aggregation ability (Fig. 1). This finding suggests that all Bacillus cultures have increased level of adhesion and colonization ability, which can prevent pathogenic access by steric interactions or specific blockage of cell receptors [40]. The difference in the level of adhesion among the tested cultures could be attributed to several factors such as the non-specific reaction by charge and hydrophobicity [32]. Moreover, hydrophobicity capacity of all Bacillus strains tested in toluene was remarkably higher than that of B. cereus strains, BC1 (52.8%), and BC2 (58.5%) from Nigerian daddawa [9], Bacillus spp. MKSK-J1, MKSK-E1, and MKSK-M1 from Korean traditional soy sauce with values less than 35% [33]. However, our results are in agreement with those observed by Talebi et al. [41] for Bacillus strains, 437F (57.4%), 1630F (98.0%), and 1020F (83.7%). Cell surface hydrophobicity increases the propensity of microbial cells to adhere to surfaces and this adhesion capability is the primary stage in microbial colonization, making the cell surface hydrophobicity a crucial property in cell attachment to surfaces [42]. Auto-aggregation and cell surface hydrophobicity are directly correlated, and according to Manhar et al. [43], hydrophobicity could be one of the factors that determine the ability of bacterial cultures to auto-aggregate. Regarding auto-aggregation test, B. cereus F20 showed the highest value (92.30%) whereas B. dakarensis B54 exerted the lowest value (49.35%) for 3 h incubation (Fig. 1). The auto-aggregation rates of our Bacillus strains were higher than that reported by Nwagu et al. [9] for probiotic B. cereus strains, BC1 (53.7%), and BC2 (48.69%) and by Talebi et al. [41] for Bacillus strains, 437F (23.2%), 1630F (20.5%), and 1020F (38.8%) for 3 h. However, auto-aggregation rate of the Bacillus strains tested fit in with results obtained by Manhar et al. [43] for B. amyloliquefaciens strains (65.5–75.5%) for 24 h, and by Lee et al. [33] for Bacillus strains, MKSK-E1, MKSK-M1, and MKSK-J1 with both 90% auto-aggregation rates. Auto-aggregation ability is related to the ability of the microbial cells to adhere to the gut epithelial cells [44], a key factor in microbial colonization and persistence in the host’s gastrointestinal tract [9] where they exerted antimicrobial effect against pathogens.

Previous studies reported the antimicrobial activity of numerous Bacillus strains isolates from various plant-based traditional fermented food condiments in Africa. A wide antimicrobial spectrum of Bacillus spp. isolated from Bikalga has been reported by Compaoré et al. [45]. The anti-fungal activity of Bacillus spp. isolated from Maari has also been reported by Kaboré et al. [46]. However, this was not observed in the current study. It is well documented that the antimicrobial spectrum depends on the used method, the nature and/or concentration of antimicrobial compounds or the nature of indicator pathogens [45]. Thus, the current finding could be explained by the above raisons. The ability to produce antimicrobial compounds is one of the key characteristics used to assess the probiotic potential of bacteria [47, 48]. Their secondary metabolites are involved in defense against pathogens through the cleaving of their receptor sites in intestinal epithelial cells [44]. Among various antimicrobial compounds produce by Bacillus species, bacteriocins such as subtilisin, subtilosin are mainly recognized to help digestion and reduce allergenicity.

For antibiogram, our previous study revealed that all Bacillus strains were susceptible to the majority of antibiotics except bacitracin for which they were all resistant, suggesting that these Bacillus strains may not carry antibiotic resistance genes that can be transferred to pathogenic microorganisms [7]. Moreover, our findings were in line with similar previous reports on the susceptibility of Bacillus species to several antibiotics commonly used in medicine [9, 20, 21, 49].

Regarding biofilm production by Bacillus strains, our results were similar to those reported by Latorre et al. [23] and Shemesh and Chaia [24]. Although biofilms are involved in the majority of chronic infections [50], conversely, they have roles in biocontrol processes [51]. Indeed, the ingestion of food containing Bacillus spores orally and the germination of these spores in the intestinal tract allow the proliferation of vegetative cells that adhere as a biofilm and colonize the surface of the intestinal mucosa [39]. Thus, these biofilms help Bacillus to attach to the epithelial cells of the intestine [52] and increase their persistence and proliferation on the intestinal mucosa where they prevent the adhesion of entero-pathogens [23] and exert the probiotic effects to host [39]. Bacillus are being explored for their probiotic potential in animals and humans [13]. Studies comparing Bacillus-containing foods to in-vivo standards have reported numerous health benefits of the latter [53]. These beneficial effects include modulation of the gastrointestinal tract, activation of macrophages, aggregation with pathogens, intestinal barrier function, restoration of intestinal flora, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer activity, reduction of blood and heart disease [54, 55]. Thus, the field of investigations on Bacillus has recently focused on their probiotic [13, 52] and therapeutic [55, 56] applications. Indeed, several studies have shown that Bacillus strains can be used in the treatment of diarrhea, reduction of cholesterol levels, etc. [15, 54, 57, 58]. This has allowed some Bacillus strains such as B. clausii, B. coagulans, B. licheniformis and B. subtilis to be included in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) list of so-called GRAS bacteria [13].

The current results on the evaluation of the technological properties showed that all Bacillus strains used in this study have very interesting enzymatic background through protease, amylase, lipase, and tannase activity (Table 3, Fig. 4A and B), PGA production (Fig. 5), and thermotolerance. For a probiotic strain to effectively function as a food fermenter, the synthesis of these hydrolytic enzymes is required to break down the complex food polymers in order to generate simpler compounds such as peptides, amino acids, reducing sugars, and oligosaccharides which will be further converted through other biological reactions to organic acids and other flavor-impacting and health benefiting compounds [59]. Hence, through these enzymatic activities, Bacillus degrade poorly digestible or non-digestible and toxic macromolecules and anti-nutrients into assimilable metabolites and produce biomolecules with a crucial role on the organoleptic and nutritional quality of fermented foods [60, 61]. For example, they hydrolyze casein to peptides and amino acids, polysaccharides to simple carbohydrates, lipids to fatty acids [3, 15, 62, 63] and tannins to glucose and assimilable gallic acid [15]. The hydrolytic by-products of these enzymes also engage in biological and chemical reactions to produce flavor compounds which give the fermented food its characteristic properties. The metabolism of anti-nutritional factors by fermentative micro-organisms plays a crucial role in improving the nutritional quality of fermented grain-based foods [64]. This ability to metabolize tannins depends on the type of micro-organism and the culture conditions [15]. Thus, all Bacillus strains tested in the current study were found to be hydrolysable tannin tolerant and thus able to grow on tannin agar medium. However, only B. cabrialesii F26 and B. tequilensis F44 were able to metabolize tannic acid. For PGA production, B. subtilis F24, B. cabrialesii F26 and B. tequilensis F44 were able to produce PGA as viscous and mucous colonies on ME medium. The production of PGA by B. subtilus strains had also been reported by previous investigators [29, 30, 65]. This polymer is used in medicine, food, etc. due to its excellent properties of biodegradability and non-toxicity to humans [66, 67]. The production of PGA by Bacillus strains improves the organoleptic and nutritional quality of fermented products. Through the enzymatic activities and antimicrobial metabolites production potential, Bacillus species participate either directly or indirectly in the development of organoleptic and nutritional quality and safety of fermented products [3, 26, 46, 68]. Todays, Bacillus strains (mainly B. subtilis) are being explored as starters to guarantee the quality of traditional African fermented foods [1, 3, 69].

Overall, the evaluation of probiotic and technological characteristics of Bacillus strains in the current study highlighted their ability to metabolize macromolecules into assimilable nutrients, to survive gastrointestinal-like conditions and exert probiotic effects. Based on current results, B. cereus F20, B. benzoevorans F21 and B. tequilensis F44 could serve as potential probiotic-starter cultures for high-quality fermented legume-based condiments production, whose consumption could allow their proliferation in the gastrointestinal tract where they can exert health benefits to the consumers.

Conclusion

This study revealed that Bacillus spp. isolated from soumbala display interesting probiotic and technological potential. These findings are supported by their ability to survive the conditions of gastrointestinal tract, antimicrobial activity and cell surface adhesion power that could favor their direct interaction. Based on these data, B. cereus F20, B. benzoevorans F21 and B. tequilensis F44 could serve as potential probiotic-starter cultures for the development and promotion of therapeutic and health-promoting fermented foods that may impact human health. Nevertheless, their effective use in humans may require further in vivo probiotic studies.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and/or analyzed during the current study are included in this article. The accession numbers for the six Bacillus strains named B54 (MZ773905), F20 (MZ773907), F21 (MZ773908), F24 (MZ773909), F26 (MZ773911) and F44 (MZ773913) are available in NCBI.

Notes

  1. https://www.ezbiocloud.net/

Abbreviations

BHI:

Brain hearth infusion

ACS:

Hydrocarbon solvents

AFF:

Alkaline fermented foods

GRAS:

Generally recognized as safe

PGA:

Poly-γ-glutamic acid

FDA:

Food and drug administration

GIT:

Gastrointestinal tract

References

  1. Owusu-Kwarteng J, Parkouda C, Adewumi GA, Ouoba LII, Jespersen L. Technologically relevant Bacillus species and microbial safety of West African traditional alkaline fermented seed condiments. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;0(0):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1830026.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Parkouda C, Nielsen DS, Azokpota P, Ouoba IIL, Amoa-Awua WK, Thorsen L, et al. The microbiology of alkaline-fermentation of indigenous seeds used as food condiments in Africa and Asia. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2009;35(2):139–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408410902793056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ouoba LII, Traditional Alkaline Fermented Foods: Selection of Functional Bacillus Starter Cultures for Soumbala Production. In: Speranza B, Bevilacqua A, Corbo MR, Sinigaglia, M, Editors. Starter Cultures in Food Production (1st Edition). London: John Wiley & Sons; 2017. p.370–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118933794.ch18.

  4. Kabré E, Bazié R, Bandé M, Sanou T, Nikiéma F, Sakandé J. Study of the nutritional values and sanitary quality of soumbala collected from six regions of Burkina Faso. Afr J Biochem Res. 2020;14(3):92–101. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbr2020.1091.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dabiré Y, Mogmenga I, Somda MK, Ugwuanyi J, Ezeogu LI, Dicko MH, et al. Production technique, safety and quality of soumbala, a local food condiment sold and consumed in Burkina Faso. Afr J Food Sci. 2020;14(2):38–52. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJFS2019.1891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dabiré Y, Somda NS, Compaoré SC, Mogmenga I, Somda MK, Ouattara SA, et al. Molecular screening of bacteriocin-producing Bacillus spp. isolated from Soumbala, a fermented food condiment from Parkia biglobosa seeds. Sci Afr. 2021;12:9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00836.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dabiré Y, Somda NS, Somda MK, Mogmenga I, Traoré AK, Ezeogu LI, et al. Molecular identification and safety assessment of Bacillus strains isolated from Burkinabe traditional condiment “soumbala.” Ann Microbiol. 2022;72:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13213-022-01664-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Compaoré CS, Tapsoba FW, Parkouda C, Tamboura D, Traoré EMA, Diawara B, et al. Development of Starter Cultures carrier for the production of High-Quality Soumbala, a Food Condiment Based on Parkia Biglobosa Seeds. Afr J Biotechnol. 2020;19(11):820–8. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb2020.17244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nwagu TN, Ugwuodo CJ Onwosi CO, Inyima O, Uchendu OC, Akpuru C. Evaluation of the probiotic attributes of Bacillus strains isolated from traditional fermented African locust bean seeds (Parkia biglobosa), “daddawa” Ann Microbiol. 2020; 70(20):15p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13213-020-01564-x.

  10. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. Expert consensus document: The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nature Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):506–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang T, Wu M-B, Chen Z-J, Lin J-P, Yang L-R. Separation, determination and antifungal activity test of the products from a new Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Nat Prod Res. 2016;30(10):1215–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2015.1048246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo XH, Kim JM, Nam HM, Park SY, Kim JM. Screening Lactic Acid Bacteria from Swine Origins for Multistrain Probiotics Based on in Vitro Functional Properties. Anaerobe. 2010;16(4):321–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cutting SM. Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiol. 2011;28:214–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burgain J. Micro-encapsulation de bactéries probiotiques dans des matrices laitières: Études des mécanismes de formation par une approche Multi-échelle. Thèse de Doctorat: Université de Lorraine, France; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Unban K, Kochasee P, Shetty K, Khanongnuc. Tannin-tolerant and extracellular tannase producing Bacillus isolated from traditional fermented tea leaves and their probiotic functional properties. Foods. 2020;9(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9040490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiliç GB, Kuleaşan Hakan, Sömer VF, Akpinar D. Determining potential probiotic properties of human originated Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2013;18(3):479–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-012-0785-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Borah D, Gogoi P, Agarwal D, Khataniar A. Characterization of a newly isolated probiotic strain from Oecophylla smaragdina, an edible insect popular among the indigenous communities of Northeast India. Indian J Microbiol. 2019;59:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-018-0758-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. García-Hernández Y, Pérez-Sánchez T, Boucourt R, Balcázar JL, Nicoli JR, Moreira-Silva J, et al. Isolation, characterization and evaluation of probiotic lactic acid bacteria for potential use in animal production. Res Vet Sci. 2016;108:125–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.08.009z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S. Adhesion and aggregation properties of probiotic and pathogen strains. Eur Food Res Technol. 2008;226(5):1065–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0632-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kavitha M, Raja M, Perumal P. Evaluation of probiotic potential of Bacillus spp. isolated from the digestive tract of freshwater fish Labeo Calbasu (Hamilton, 1822). Aquacult Rep. 2018;11:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2018.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Compaoré CS, Jensen LB, Diawara B, Ouédraogo GA, Jakobsen MS, Ouoba LII. Resistance to antimicrobials and acid and bile tolerance of Bacillus spp. isolated from Bikalga, fermented seeds of Hibiscus sabdariffa. Afr J Food Sci. 2013;7:408–14. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJFS2013.1018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rokana N, Mallappa RH, Batish VK, Grover S. Interaction between putative probiotic Lactobacillus strains of Indian gut origin and Salmonella: Impact on intestinal barrier function. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2017;84:851–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.08.021.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Latorre JD, Hernandez-velasco X, Wolfenden RE, Vicente JL, Yeoman CJ, Bischoff KM, et al. Evaluation and selection of Bacillus species based on enzyme production, antimicrobial activity, and biofilm synthesis as direct-fed microbial candidates for poultry. Front Vet Sci. 2016;3(95):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shemesh M, Chaia YA. combination of glycerol and manganese promotes biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis via histidine kinase KinD signaling. J Bacteriol. 2013;195(12):2747–54. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00028-13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chantawannakul P, Oncharoen A, Klanbut K, Chukeatirote E, Lumyong S. Characterization of proteases of Bacillus subtilis strain 38 isolated from traditionally fermented soybean in Northern Thailand. Science Asia. 2002;28(3):241. https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2002.28.241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Savadogo A, Ilboudo AJ, Gnankiné O, Traoré AS. Numeration and identification of thermotolerant endospore-forming Bacillus from two. Adv Environ Res Biol. 2011;5:2960–6 (GALE|A271052492).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dahiya P, Purkayastha S. Isolation, screening and production of extracellular alkaline lipase from a newly isolated Bacillus sp. PD-12. J Biol Sci. 2011;11(5):381–7. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2011.381.387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mosleh H, Naghiha A, Naghi KA, Khajavi M. Isolation and Identification of Tannin-Degrading Bacteria from Native Sheep and Goat Feces in Kohgiloye and Boyer-Ahmad Province. Int j Adv Biological Biomed Res. 2014;2:176–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Da Silva SB, Cantarelli VV, Ayub MAZ. Production and optimization of poly-γ-glutamic acid by Bacillus subtilis BL53 isolated from the amazonian environment. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2014;37(3):469–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-013-1016-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang D, Kim H, Lee S, Kim DH, Joe MH. Simultaneous production of poly-γ-glutamic acid and 2,3-butanediol by a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis CS13. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104(16):7005–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10755-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Panda MK, Sahu MK. Isolation and characterization of a thermophilic Bacillus sp. with protease activity isolated from hot spring of Tarabalo, Odisha. India Iran J Microbiol. 2013;5(2):159–65 (PMID: 23825735).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nithya V, Halami PM. Evaluation of the probiotic characteristics of Bacillus species isolated from different food sources. Ann Microbiol. 2013;63(1):129–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0453-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee S, Lee J, Jin YI, Jeong JC, Chang YH, Lee Y, et al. Probiotic characteristics of Bacillus strains isolated from Korean traditional soy sauce. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2017;79:518–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.08.040.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jena PK, Trivedi D, Thakore K, Chaudhary H, Giri SS. Seshadri S. Isolation and characterization of probiotic properties of Lactobacilli isolated from rat fecal microbiota Microbio Immunol. 2013;57:407–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1348-0421.12054.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Brashears MM, Galyean ML, Loneragan GH, Mann JE, Killinger-Mann AK Prevalence of Escherichia Coli O157:H7 and performance by Beef Feedlot Cattle Given Lactobacillus Direct-Fed Microbials. J Food Prot. 2003; 66: 5. http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/66/5/748/1674762/0362-028x-66_5_748.pdf.

  36. Gilliland SE, Staley TE, Bush LJ. Importance of Bile Tolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus used as a dietary Adjunct. J Dairy Sci. 1984;67(12):3045–51. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81670-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaboré D, Thorsen L, Nielsen SD, Berner ST, Sawadogo-Lingani H, Diawara B, et al. Bacteriocin formation by dominant aerobic spore formers isolated from traditional maari. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;154:10–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vizoso Pinto MG, Franz CMAP, Schillinger U, Holzapfel WH. Lactobacillus spp. within vitro probiotic properties from human faeces and traditional fermented products. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006;109:205–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.01.029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee NK, Kim WS, Paik HD. Bacillus strains as human probiotics: characterization, safety, microbiome, and probiotic carrier. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2019;28(5):1297–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00691-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Claudia Otero M, Ocaña VS, Elena N-M. Selection of probiotic microorganisms bacterial surface characteristics applied to selection of probiotic microorganisms. Methods Mol Biol. 2004;268:435–40.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Talebi S, Makhdoumi A, Bahreini M, Matin MM, Moradi HS. Three novel Bacillus strains from a traditional lacto-fermented pickle as potential probiotics. J Appl Microbiol. 2018;125(3):888–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Krasowska A, Sigler K. How microorganisms use hydrophobicity and what does this mean for human needs? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Manhar AK, Saikia D, Bashir Y, Mech RK, Nath D, Konwar BK, et al. In vitro evaluation of cellulolytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens AMS1 isolated from traditional fermented soybean (Churpi) as an animal probiotic. Res Vet Sci. 2015;99:149–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.01.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Patel AK, Ahire JJ, Pawar SP, Chaudhari BL, Chincholkar SB. Comparative accounts of probiotic characteristics of Bacillus spp. isolated from food wastes. Food Res Int. 2009;42(4):505–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.01.013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Compaoré CS, Nielsen DS, Ouoba LII, Berner TS, Nielsen KF, Sawadogo-lingani H, et al. Co-production of surfactin and a novel bacteriocin by Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis H4 isolated from Bikalga, an African alkaline Hibiscus sabdariffa seed fermented condiment. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013;162(3):297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.01.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kaboré D, Gagnon M, Roy D, Sawadogo-Lingani H, Diawara B, LaPointe G. Rapid screening of starter cultures for maari based on antifungal properties. Microbiol Res. 2018;207:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.11.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fuller R. Probiotics in human medicine Gut. 1991;32:439–42. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.32.4.439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Duc LH, Hong HA, Barbosa TM, Adriano O, Cutting SM. Characterization of Bacillus probiotics available for human use. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(4):2161–71. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.4.2161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Adimpong DB, Sørensen KI, Thorsen L, Stuer-lauridsen B, Abdelgadir WS, Nielsen DS. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacillus strains isolated from primary starters for African Traditional Bread Production and characterization of the bacitracin operon and bacitracin biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(22):7903–14. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00730-12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ostrowski A, Mehert A, Prescott A, Kiley TB, Stanley-Wall NR. YuaB functions synergistically with the exopolysaccharide and TasA amyloid fibers to allow biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(18):4821–31. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00223-11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Hobley L, Ostrowski A, Rao FV, Bromley KM, Porter M, Prescott AR, et al. BslA is a self-assembling bacterial hydrophobin that coats the Bacillus subtilis biofilm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(33):13600–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306390110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ilinskaya ON, Ulyanova VV, Yarullina DR, Gataullin IG. Secretome of Intestinal Bacilli: A Natural Guard against Pathologies. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ritter AC, Folmer-Correa AP, Veras FF, Brandelli A. Characterization of Bacillus subtilis available as probiotics. J Microbiol Res. 2018;8(2):23–32. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.microbiology.20180802.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Andriani Y, Rochima E, Safitri R, Rahayuningsih SR. Characterization of Bacillus Megaterium and Bacillus Mycoides Bacteria as Probiotic Bacteria in Fish and Shrimp Feed. KnE Life Sci. 2017;2(6):127–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Cao J, Yu Z, Liu W. Zhao Ji, Zhang H, Zhai Q, Chen W. Probiotic characteristics of Bacillus coagulans and associated implications for human health and diseases J Funct Foods. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2019.103643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Petruk G, Donadio G, Lanzilli M, Isticato R, Monti DM. Alternative use of Bacillus subtilis spores: Protection against environmental oxidative stress in human normal keratinocytes. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20153-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Shukla S, Park JH, Chung SH, Kim M. Ochratoxin A reduction ability of biocontrol agent Bacillus subtilis isolated from Korean traditional fermented food Kimchi. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26162-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Gu X, Sun J, Cui Y, Wang X, Sang Y. Biological degradation of aflatoxin M1 by Bacillus pumilus E-1–1–1. Microbiol Open. 2018; e663

  59. Jeong D, Heo S, Lee B, Lee H, Jeong K, Her J, Lee K, Lee J. Effects of the predominant bacteria from meju and doenjang on the production of volatile compounds during soybean fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;262:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.09.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Savita PD, Suvarna VC, Annu T, Balakrishna AN, Kanchanashri B, Yallappa M. Characterization and identification of phytate solubilizing yeasts isolated from food grains. Int J Current Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6:1184–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Burgain J, Gaiani C, Jeandel C, Cailliez-Grimal C, Revol AM, Scher J. Maldigestion Du Lactose: Formes Cliniques et Solutions Thérapeutiques. Cah Nutr Diet. 2012;47(4):201–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnd.2012.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ouoba LII, Rechinger KB, Diawara B, Traoré AS, Jakobsen M. Degradation of proteins during the fermentation of African Locust Bean (Parkia Biglobosa) by strains of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus for production of soumbala. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94:396–402. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01845.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ouoba LII, Cantor MD, Diawara B, Traoré AS, Jakobsen M. Degradation of African locust bean oil by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus isolated from soumbala, a fermented African locust bean condiment. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;95(4):868–73. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02063.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mohamed IAA, Isam A, Al-Juhaimi FY, Bekhit AE-DA. Fermentation of Grains. In: Reference Module in Food Science, Melton L, Shahidi F, Varelis P. Eds.; Elsevier, Encycl Chem Technol. 2018; 2: pp.107–116. ISBN: 9780128140451. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21657-0

  65. Soliman NA, Berekaa MM, Abdel-Fattah YR. Polyglutamic acid (PGA) production by Bacillus sp. SAB-26: Application of Plackett-Burman experimental design to evaluate culture requirements. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;69(3):259–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-1982-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Luo Z, Guo Y, Liu J, Qiu H, Zhao M, Zou W, et al. Microbial synthesis of poly-γ-glutamic acid: Current progress, challenges, and future perspectives. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0537-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Bajaj I, Singhal R. Poly (Glutamic Acid) - An Emerging Biopolymer of Commercial Interest. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(10):5551–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Xavier A, Lima ER, Oliveira AME, Cardoso L, Santos J, Cangussu CHC, et al. Genetic diversity of Bacillus sp producers of amylase isolated from the soil. gmr16039771. Genet Mol Res. 2017;16(3):9. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16039771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Akpi UK, Nnamchi CI, Ugwuanyi JO. Development of Starter Culture for the Production of African Condiments and Seasoning Agents. Adv Microbiol. 2020;10:599–622. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2020.1012044.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the German DAAD service for their financial support to Yérobessor Dabiré through its In-Country/In-Region Scholarship Program 2017 (No 57377184), University of Nigeria Nsukka (UNN), Enugu State, Nigeria. They also appreciate Uppsala University for funding parts of this research through ISP/IPICS/RABIOTECH, Uppsala University project at Université Joseph KI-ZERBO.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the German DAAD service via its In-Country/In-Region Scholarship Program 2017 (Grant Number: 57377184), University of Nigeria Nsukka (UNN), Enugu State, Nigeria, and ISP/IPICS/RABIOTECH, Uppsala University project at Université Joseph KI-ZERBO for their financial support to Yérobessor Dabiré. The funding sources had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Biochimie, Biotechnologie, Technologie Alimentaire et Nutrition (LABIOTAN), Département de Biochimie Microbiologie, Ecole Doctorale Sciences et Technologies (EDST), Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, 03 P.B. 7031, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso

    Yérobessor Dabiré, Marius K. Somda, Alfred S. Traoré & Mamoudou H. Dicko

  2. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Nigeria Nsukka (UNN), Enugu state, 410001, Nigeria

    Yérobessor Dabiré, Lewis I. Ezeogu & Jerry O. Ugwuanyi

  3. Département Technologie Alimentaire (DTA), Centre National de Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (CNRST) / Institut de Recherche en Sciences Appliquées et Technologies (IRSAT) / Direction Régional de L’Ouest, 03 B.P.2393, Bobo - Dioulasso 03, Burkina Faso

    Namwin Siourimè Somda

  4. Laboratoire de Microbiologie et de Biotechnologie Microbienne (LAMBM), Département de Biochimie-Microbiologie, Ecole Doctorale Sciences et Technologies (EDST), Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, 03 P.B. 7031, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso

    Marius K. Somda, Iliassou Mogmenga & Alfred S. Traoré

  5. Département Technologie Alimentaire (DTA), Centre National de Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (CNRST) / Institut de Recherche en Sciences Appliquées et Technologies (IRSAT), 03 B.P. 7047, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso

    Clarisse B. Compaoré

  6. Laboratoire des Sciences Biologiques Appliquées, Unité de Formation et de Recherche en Sciences et Technologies (UFR-ST), Université Aube Nouvelle, 01 P.B. 234, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso

    Alfred S. Traoré

Authors
  1. Yérobessor Dabiré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Namwin Siourimè Somda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marius K. Somda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Clarisse B. Compaoré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Iliassou Mogmenga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lewis I. Ezeogu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alfred S. Traoré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jerry O. Ugwuanyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mamoudou H. Dicko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yérobessor Dabiré: methodology, experiments, data curation, formal analysis, writing-original draft; Namwin Siourimè Somda: writing-review and editing; Marius K. Somda: visualization, validation; Clarisse B. Compaoré: Writing-review and editing; Iliassou Mogmenga: writing-review and editing; Lewis I. Ezeogu: supervision, visualization and validation; Alfred S. Traoré: conceptualization, project management; Jerry O. Ugwuanyi: conceptualization, validation, visualization, writing-review and editing; Mamoudou H. Dicko: conceptualization, project administration, validation, visualization, writing-review and editing. All authors read, commented on, and approved of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yérobessor Dabiré.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have not competing interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dabiré, Y., Somda, N.S., Somda, M.K. et al. Assessment of probiotic and technological properties of Bacillus spp. isolated from Burkinabe Soumbala. BMC Microbiol 22, 228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02642-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02642-7

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us