Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

Characterization of novel Omp31 antigenic epitopes of Brucella melitensis by monoclonal antibodies

BMC MicrobiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:115

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-1025-3

Received: 8 July 2016

Accepted: 5 May 2017

Published: 15 May 2017

Abstract

Background

Brucellosis is a severe zoonotic disease worldwide. Detection and identification of Brucella species are essential to prevent or treat brucellosis in humans and animals. The outer membrane protein-31 (Omp31) is a major protein of Brucellae except for B. abortus, while the Omp31 antigenic epitopes have not been extensively characterized yet.

Results

A total of 22 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were produced against Omp31 of Brucella (B.) melitensis, of which 13 recognized five linear epitopes, 7 reacted with semi-conformational epitopes and 2 reacted with conformational epitopes, respectively. The mAb isotypes were 11 (50%) IgG2a, 5 (23%) IgG1 and 6 (27%) IgM. On the basis of epitope recognition and reactivity levels, 8 mAbs including 3 IgM and 5 IgG clones were considered as highly reactive and potentially diagnostic antibodies. Among these mAbs, 7A3 (IgG1), 5B1 (IgG2a), 2C1 (IgG2a) and 5B3 (IgG2a) reacted with differently conserved linear epitopes of B. melitensis, B. ovis, B. suis and B. canis strains, while 5H3 (IgG2a) highly reacted with a conformational epitope of Omp31 when tested with several immunoassays.

Conclusions

These potent monoclonal antibodies can be used for identifying Omp31 antigens or detecting B. melitensis and other Brucella species beyond B. abortus in vitro or in vivo.

Keywords

Brucella melitensis Omp31 antigenMonoclonal antibodyEpitope identificationConserved epitope

Background

Brucellosis is one of the most serious zoonoses worldwide. It causes severe diseases in humans and substantial animal losses. In China, human brucellosis cases are increasing. In 2015, 56,989 new cases of human brucellosis have been reported according to Chinese CDC (http://www.chinacdc.cn/), of them are mostly caused by Brucella (B.) melitensis infected sheep and goats or their products [13].

The 31–34 kDa outer membrane protein (OMP) or (Omp31) is a major membrane protein of Brucellae except for B. abortus [4]. Omp31 plays an important role in cellular and humoral immune protective responses against Brucella infection [411]. Previously we fully evaluated Omp31 epitopes in specific T-cell response in sheep vaccinated with attenuated B. melitensis vaccine [12]. However, the B-cell epitopes have not yet been extensively investigated. To date, only few epitopes recognized by antibodies to Brucella Omp31, such as monoclonal antibody A59/10F09/G10 recognizing amino acid 48–83 of B. melitensis M16 and presenting protective activity were reported [4, 13, 14]. In this study, we generated and characterized 22 novel murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) binding native Omp31 of B. melitensis. Some of these antibodies presented high reactivity with different epitopes of Omp31, suggesting potential capacity to identify Omp31 antigens of Brucellae or to detect B. melitensis or other Brucella species beyond B. abortus.

Results

Production of mAbs to Omp31 of B. melitensis

A total of 22 mAbs reactive with recombinant Omp31 (rOmp31) were selected from screening of hybridomas by EIA (Table 1). Antibody isotypes were identified for all 22 mAbs, including 50% (11/22) IgG2a, 23% (5/22) IgG1 and 27% (6/22) IgM, respectively.
Table 1

Characterization of mAbs reactive to the epitopes within Omp31 of B. melitensis

MAb

Isotype

Peptide ELISA

rOMP31 Western-Blot

NMP Western-Blot

NMP

ELISA

SSP

ELISA

TC

IFS

B. m

ICS

Epitope (aa)/peptide

1H2

IgG1 (K)

12

++

<1

1

+

L (33–48/42–57)/P05/06

2D2

IgM (K)

7

++

++

4.5

4.8

+

++

L (33–48/42–57)/P05/06

2G9

IgG1 (K)

3

++

++

<1

2.2

+

+

L (33–48/42–57)/P05/06

7A3

IgG1 (K)

1.2

++

++

7

17

+

+

L (33–48/42–57)/P05/06

5B1

IgG2a (K)

3.8

+

1.2

2

+

++

L (87–102)/P11

2C1

IgG2a (K)

2.7

++

++

2.4

5.5

++

++

L (159–174/168–183)/P19/20

2E7

IgG2a (K)

1.8

++

++

1.5

3.5

++

±

L (159–174/168–183)/P19/20

4E9

IgG2a (K)

3.7

+

++

2

5

++

++

L (159–174/168–183)/P19/20

4H10

IgG2a (K)

1.9

++

++

2.2

4.2

++

L (159–174/168–183)/P19/20

8F11

IgG2a (K)

2.2

++

++

2.5

5.5

++

+

L (159–174/168–183)/P19/20

2A8

IgG1 (K)

7.8

++

+

<1

1.5

(+)

+

L (177–192)/P21

6D8

IgG1 (K)

4.7

++

<1

<1

+

±

L (177–192)/P21

5B3

IgG2a (K)

2.8

++

+

<1

16

+

++

L (204–219)/P24

2B6

IgM (K)

<1

++

8

11

+

SC(20–240)

4H6

IgM (K)

<1

++

<1

1.2

±

SC(20–240)

5B11

IgM (K)

<1

++

5.8

9.2

±

SC(20–240)

5H3

IgG2a (K)

<1

++

++

11

18

+

++

SC(20–240)

6E10

IgG2a (K)

<1

+

+

1

2

++

SC(20–240)

6F9

IgG2a (K)

<1

+

++

<1

1.5

++

±

SC(20–240)

11C4

IgG2a (K)

<1

++

++

1.2

2.6

++

±

SC(20–240)

2H5

IgM (K)

<1

4.1

7

C (20–240)

5F11

IgM (K)

<1

8.2

12

+

C (20–240)

NMP, native membrane proteins extracts of B. melitensis; SSP, supernatant of sonicated B. melitensis proteins; TC IFS, Lentivirus-mediated Omp31, transduced 293Tcells detected by immunofluorescent staining; B.m ICS, B. melitensis strain detected by immunochemical staining; L, linear; SC, semi-conformational; C, conformational. The numbers indicate the S/CO values in the EIA; the reactivity levels are indicated by ++ (strongly reactive), + (reactive), ± (indeterminate) or – (non-reactive) in the Western-blot, IFS and ICS. (+), indicate false positive for the negative control of cells. Five IgG and three IgM clones in bold are representatives of high capacity of mAbs reacting with native Omp31 antigens of B. melitensis in various assays.

Classification of Omp31 epitopes by mAb’s recognition

In order to classify the Omp31 antigenic epitopes, all mAbs were tested for reactivity with 27 16mer overlapping peptides derived from full-length amino acid (aa) sequence, denatured or non-denatured protein forms of B. melitensis Omp31 in various immunoassays. Thirteen mAbs were reactive with 7 linear peptides in Peptide-ELISA (Fig.1a). Twenty mAbs were reactive to the denatured rOmp31 and 14 mAbs to the denatured native membrane protein extract (NMP) by Western blot (Fig. 1b), respectively. The mAbs reactivity was also tested against the non-denatured native antigens in ELISA using the NMP or the supernatant of sonicated proteins (SSP) from B. melitensis, which showed that 16 and 20 mAbs were reactive, respectively (Fig. 1c).
Fig. 1

Reactivity of mAbs to Omp31 antigens of B. melitensis. (a) Binding of mAbs to 16mer overlapping peptides derived from Omp31 in Peptide-ELISA. (b) Identification of mAbs reacting with rOmp31 and NMP (native membrane protein extracts of B. melitensis M5–90) by Western-blot. (C) Reactivity of mAbs to NMP and SSP (supernatant of sonicated proteins of B. melitensis M5–90) by ELISA. NS3, an HCV NS3 peptide, recombinant protein and an un-related mAb to HCV NS3 were used as negative-controls, respectively. The dotted line indicates the level of cut off defined as mean + 2SD of OD value to negative controls

According to the nature of Omp31 antigens recognized by 22 mAbs, the epitopes were stratified into three groups of linear (L), semi-conformational (SC) and conformational (C) forms. Among these 22 mAbs, 13 reacted with the linear epitopes, 7 reacted with the semi-conformational and 2 reacted with the conformational epitopes presented in either rOmp31 or native Omp31 antigens of B. melitensis (Table 1).

Linear epitope mapping of Omp31 by mAbs

Among seven reactive linear peptides (Fig. 1a), the epitope shared by peptides P05 and P06 was reactive with mAbs 1H2, 2D2, 2G9 and 7A3. However, due to the stronger reactivity with P05 than P06, the minimal aa common sequence of Omp31 was designated as epitope Ep5 (39SWTGGYIGINA49) (Fig. 2). Similarly, epitope Ep20 (168GDDASALHT176) overlapped by peptides P19 and P20 reacted with mAbs 2C1, 2E7, 4E9, 4H10 and 8F11. Epitope Ep21 (183AGWTLGAGAE192) reacted with both mAbs 2A8 and 6D8. Epitopes Ep11 (87QAGYNWQLDNGVVLGA102) and Ep24 (204EYLYTDLGKRNLVDVD219) were recognized only by mAb 5B1 or 5B3, respectively (Fig. 2). Alignment of Omp31 aa sequences showed that these five epitopes were completely conserved among B. melitensis, B. ovis, B. suis and B. canis except for a single aa mutation (S172P) within Ep20 of B. ovis strains (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Mapping for linear epitopes of Omp31 recognized by mAbs. The amino acid (aa) sequences of 16mer peptides reactive to the mAbs are presented, of which the epitopes (Ep) are designated on the top of underlined aa sequences. Aa position of Omp31 is indicated at the beginning and the end of the peptide sequence. MAbs are indicated below the epitopes they recognize

Fig. 3

Alignment of Omp31 sequences from four species of Brucella strains. The aa sequences of Omp31 from B. melitensis (B.m), B. ovis (B.o), B. suis (B.s) and B. canis (B.c) strains were retrieved from Genbank database. The accession numbers are ADZ88512.1 (M5–90/China), ADZ67646.1 (M28/China), P0A3U4.1 (M16/US), ACQ84164.1 (293/Malaysia), AAL27294.1 (BCCN 91.264/ Argentina), AAL27292.1 (Reo 198/US), AAL27290.1 (513/Former USSR), AAL27287.1 (Thomsen/Denmark), AAL27296.1 (BCCN R18/US). The identified mAb’s recognition epitopes are underlined on top of aa sequences

Recognition of Omp31-lentivirus transduced cells

To detect Brucella Omp31 intracellularly, 293FT cells were transduced by recombinant Omp31-lentivirus (LV-HAGE-Omp31) for mimicking Brucella infection in human or animal cells. By using IFS, one IgM mAb (2D2) and 16 IgG mAbs were reactive to the expressed rOmp31 in transduced 293FT cells (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Recognition of lentivirus-mediated Omp31 expressing cells by mAbs in IFS. The lentivirus (LV-HAGE-Omp31) transduced 293FT cells were stained by the IFS with individual mAbs specific to Omp31. Reactivity levels are estimated from immune-stained cells by the fluorescent density of strongly reactive (++), reactive (+) or non-reactive (−), respectively. LV-ZsGreen is a negative control for lentivirus vector transduced cells; 293FT is a control of cells observed in white light under a Nikon Labophot photomicroscope

Identification of Brucella melitensis strains by mAbs

To identify reactivity of mAbs with Omp31 on the membrane of bacteria, the intact B. melitensis strains were immunologically stained by ICS with mAbs, individually. Of 22 mAbs, 12 were reactive with intact B. melitensis bacteria by ICS (Fig. 5 and Table 1).
Fig. 5

Identification of B. melitensis strain by mAbs in ICS. The intact bacteria of B. melitensis strain were stained in ICS by individual mAbs specific to Omp31. (a) Positive staining; (b) Negative, indeterminate or control staining. GB, Gram staining for bacterial control of B. melitensis strain viewed in white light under a microbiological microscope. NC = negative control for the ICS with a mAb to HCV NS3

Based on cross-matching reactivity levels of mAbs to the native Omp31 antigen carrying different recognition epitopes, 1 IgG1 (mAb 7A3) and 4 IgG2a (mAbs 5B1, 2C1, 5B3 and 5H3) clones presented high reactive profiles suitable as diagnostic antibodies in immunoassays of Western-blot, ELISA, IFS or ICS (Table 1). Among six IgM clones, mAbs 2D2, 2B6 and 5F11 showed high-level reactivity in EIAs (Table 1), making them more suitable as primary antibodies for capturing the Omp31 antigen in serological tests. In contrast, mAbs 6D8, 2A8 and 4H6 were unable or weakly to react with the native NMP, SSP or intact B. melitensis strains, suggesting that the recognizing epitopes might not be exposed on the protein surface of Omp31 or Brucella strains (Table 1).

Discussion

Since Omp31 was identified in B. melitensis [4], most studies focused on its role in cellular immune protection against Brucella infections [7, 8, 10, 12]. Although Omp31 elicited specific antibody production and bactericidal activity [6, 11, 15], it was considered a poor diagnostic antigen [14]. In this study, we prepared 22 murine mAbs against Omp31 of B. melitensis, of which 50% (11/22) were IgG2a, 23% (5/22) IgG1 and 27% (6/22) IgM isotypes, respectively. In contrast, we previously found IgG1 to be the majority of isotypes (62% or 18/29) of mAbs to BP26 of B. melitensis [16], which might in part explain why BP26 was a diagnostic antigen with higher reactivity to the sera from Brucella infected humans or animals. In subclasses of antibodies, mice have IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG3, which are functionally similar to human IgG1, IgG2, IgG4 and IgG3, respectively. In general, IgG1 is mainly associated with Th2 but IgG2a with Th1 profiles [1719]. Therefore, a higher population of IgG2a induced by Omp31 may confer Th1-type immune protection against Brucella infection through IFN-γ and up-regulating phagocytosis. However, BP26 mainly induced a major IgG1 subclass antibody and functionally polarized Th2 cells in Brucella infection [1623]. The ratio of IgG isotypes might be varied in relating to different antigenic properties of proteins.

Besides cellular immune response, a specific monoclonal antibody to Omp31 (A59/10F09/G10, IgG2a) was identified previously as a protective factor against B. melitensis or B. ovis infection in mice [4, 14, 24]. MAb A59/10F09/G10 recognized a hydrophilic loop minimized within aa 48–83 of Omp31, which was exposed on the surface of pathogenic strains of B. melitensis, B. ovis and B. canis [4, 13, 14, 25]. Another study reported that 11 mAbs obtained after immunization with truncated rOmp31 of B. ovis recognized epitopes localized at distant positions, such as aa48–83, aa149–182 or aa180–224 [14]. In our study, we depicted characteristics of 22 mAbs, and found that 13 mAbs were reactive with linear epitopes and others with conformational or semi-conformational epitopes [16]. None of the mAbs reacted with the same epitope as mAb A59/10F09/G10. However, we identified five new discreet epitopes (Ep) of Omp31 mapped within 27 16mer overlapping peptides, including Ep5 (aa39–49), Ep11 (aa87–102), Ep20 (aa168–176), Ep21 (aa183–192) and Ep24 (aa204–219) (Fig. 2). It remains to be investigated further whether some of mAbs reacting with these epitopes have the ability to protect animals against B. melitensis or B. ovis infection.

In addition, epitopes Ep5 and Ep21 were considered as B-cell epitopes in the present study and shared its aa sequences with Omp31 T-cell epitopes P06 and P21, which were identified in sheep vaccinated with attenuated B. melitensis M5–90 [12]. Interestingly, those mAbs recognizing both B and T cell epitopes were all of IgG1 isotype, while other mAbs to B-cell epitopes (Ep11, Ep20 and Ep24) were IgG2a isotype alone (Table 1). A 27 amino acid polypeptide (aa48–74) was previously identified as both T and B cell epitopes inducing cellular and humoral response in mice, and the IgG1 titer was higher than IgG2a in sera [26]. However, it is still unknown whether there are significant discrepancies between IgG1 and IgG2a binding to B or T cell epitopes, or isotypes of mAbs sharing reactivity with different types of epitopes. The mAb A59/10F09/G10 was IgG2a and reactive with a common epitope (aa48–83) of T and B cells [4], this finding being inconsistent with the above description of epitopes mostly associated with IgG1.

A recent study reported a monoclonal antibody-based B. melitensis lipopolysaccharide antigen detection by ELISA [27]. In our study, the panel of 22 mAbs to Omp31 was tested to evaluate their reactivity with different forms of recombinant and native Omp31 of B. melitensis, including intact bacteria and bacterial or cell extracts detected by Western-blot, ELISA, IFS and ICS. Data in Table 1 showed that 5 IgG and 3 IgM clones of mAbs had suitable ability for the detection of Omp31 or Brucella strains by diverse immunoassays. MAbs 7A3, 5B1, 2C1, 5B3 and 5H3 reacted with different Omp31 epitopes exposed on the surface of B. melitensis strain and identified by ICS. Few substitutions were found in alignments of Omp31 aa sequences of B. melitensis, B. ovis, B. suis and B canis strains. The five new epitopes (Ep5, Ep11, Ep20, Ep21 and Ep24) identified in this study had conserved sequences except for a single aa mutation within Ep20 (Fig. 3), suggesting that these mAbs could be used to detect at least four species of Brucella strains. The IFS detection of intracellular Brucellae might be an alternative assay of conventional bacterial culture for examination of Brucella elimination by brucellosis treatment in clinical practice [28].

Conclusions

This study identified 22 novel mAbs specific to Omp31 of B. melitensis. Five IgG and 3 IgM clones presented high ability to recognize multiple epitopes of Omp31 antigen, which were exposed on the protein surface of intact B. melitensis and highly conserved among B. melitensis, B. ovis, B. suis and B. canis strains. The monoclonal antibodies obtained in this study could provide a substantial help as key reagents in diagnostic tools for identifying Brucella Omp31 antigens in laboratory, or for detecting intracellular Brucella melitensis and other Brucella species beyond B. abortus in clinical.

Methods

Animals

Mice were obtained from the Animal Experimental Center of Southern Medical University (SMU), Guangzhou, China. Animal care was in accordance with national and institutional policies for animal health and well-being. Mouse surgery was performed under anesthesia for minimizing suffering of animals.

Recombinant Omp31 (rOmp31)

The full-length gene of 221 amino acids (aa) encoding for the matured Omp31 (excluding 19 aa of signal polypeptides) from attenuated vaccine strain of B. melitensis M5–90 was constructed with pET-30a plasmid (pET-Omp31) and expressed in E.coli as described previously [15, 16]. The soluble recombinant Omp31 was obtained at 95% purity and used for mouse immunization and serological tests.

Monoclonal antibody production

The 6-week old BALB/c female mice were immunized with three injections of rOmp31 antigen at 2-week intervals as previously described [15, 16]. The spleen cells prepared from the immunized mice were fused with SP2/0 myeloma cells by PEG 4000 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, United States). The hybridoma cells secreting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to rOmp31 were individually selected up to a single clone by EIA [15, 16]. All clones were passaged in producing cells for a period of 6 months and kept frozen in liquid nitrogen after which antibodies were kept frozen at −20 °C. Pre-immunization and immunized sera were collected and used as the negative or positive controls for screening mAbs, respectively. One mAb (IgG1 kappa) to recombinant non-structural protein-3 (NS3) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) was used as an unrelated negative control [29]. MAb isotyping was performed by IsoQuick Strips (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, United States).

Lentivirus-mediated Omp31 expression ex vivo

Omp31 gene was transferred into a lentiviral vector and packaged as an infectious recombinant lentivirus LV-HAGE-Omp31. Omp31 was expressed in 293FT cells by Omp31-lentivirus-mediated transduction as described previously [30], mimicking Omp31 antigen in Brucella-infected mammalian cells.

Immunoassays

Recombinant Omp31 and native Omp31-containing membrane protein extracts (NMP) from B. melitensis M5–90 were used in ELISA for mAbs detection [15]. A panel of 27 16mer overlapping peptides spanning full-length of Omp31 sequence were applied in peptide-ELISA to identify epitopes recognized by mAbs [12]. Cutoffs were calculated as mean OD + 2SD with 95% confidence interval (CI) of three negative controls. Western-blot was used to identify the reactivity of mAbs with rOmp31 or NMP extracted from transformed E. coli, B. melitensis or transduced cells [12, 30]. Lentivirus LV-HAGE-Omp31 transduced cells were detected by immunofluorescent staining (IFS) with individual mAbs. The intact B. melitensis strains were examined by immunochemical staining (ICS) under a microbiological optical microscope (Olympus, Japan).

A goat anti-mouse IgG and IgM horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugate (Rockland Immunochemicals Corp, Boyertown, Pennsylvania, USA) was used as secondary antibody in ELISA and ICS. DyLightTM594-conjugated AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG + IgM (H + L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA, USA) was used as secondary antibody in IFS. A mAb to HCV NS3 (IgG1) was used as negative control.

Abbreviations

B.

Brucella spp.

EIA: 

Enzyme immunoassay

ELISA: 

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

ICS: 

Immunochemical staining

IFS: 

Immunofluorescent staining

mAb: 

Monoclonal antibody

Omp31: 

Outer membrane protein 31

Declarations

Acknowledgements

ZThe authors thank for Drs Hao Zhang, Xiaoning Liu and Shuiping Hou (Guangzhou CDC, Guangzhou, China) for their preparing the slides of B. melitensis cultures for immunochemical staining in the study.

Funding

This study was funded by the grants from National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFD0500301), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31372443), Guangdong Provincial S&T Project (No. 2014A020214003), Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Blood Safety (No. 201509010009). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The monoclonal antibodies and hybridoma cells described in this study were available at the Department of Transfusion Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Authors’ contributions

CL and WW conceived and designed the experiments. JL, FH, SC, PL and ZH performed the experiments. CL and WW analyzed the data. SC contributed reagents and materials. CL and JPA wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Mouse experimentation and sample collection were approved by Southern Medical University (SMU) Animal Care and Use Committee (permit numbers: NFYY-2008-043 and NFYY-2010-076).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Southern Medical University
(2)
Guangzhou Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
(3)
Qingyuan People’s Hospital
(4)
Department of Hematology, University of Cambridge
(5)
School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University

References

  1. Chen S, Zhang H, Liu X, Wang W, Hou S, Li T, Zhao S, Yang Z, Li C. Increasing threat of brucellosis to low-risk persons in urban settings, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:126–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Deqiu S, Donglou X, Jiming Y. Epidemiology and control of brucellosis in China. Vet Microbiol. 2002;90:165–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhang WY, Guo WD, Sun SH, Jiang JF, Sun HL, Li SL, Liu W, Cao WC. Human brucellosis, Inner Mongolia, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:2001–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Vizcaíno N, Cloeckaert A, Zygmunt MS, Dubray G. Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of the Brucella melitensis omp31 gene coding for an immunogenic major outer membrane protein. Infect Immun. 1996;64:3744–51.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Avila-Calderón ED, Lopez-Merino A, Jain N, Peralta H, López-Villegas EO, Sriranganathan N, Boyle SM, Witonsky S, Contreras-Rodríguez A. Characterization of outer membrane vesicles from Brucella melitensis and protection induced in mice. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:352493.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassataro J, Pasquevich K, Bruno L, Wallach JC, Fossati CA, Baldi PC. Antibody reactivity to Omp31 from Brucella melitensis in human and animal infections by smooth and rough Brucellae. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:111–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Cassataro J, Estein SM, Pasquevich KA, Velikovsky CA, de la Barrera S, Bowden R, Fossati CA, Giambartolomei GH. Vaccination with the recombinant Brucella outer membrane protein 31 or a derived 27-amino-acid synthetic peptide elicits a CD4+ T helper 1 response that protects against Brucella melitensis infection. Infect Immun. 2005;73:8079–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassataro J, Velikovsky CA, de la Barrera S, Estein SM, Bruno L, Bowden R, Pasquevich KA, Fossati CA, Giambartolomei GH. A DNA vaccine coding for the Brucella outer membrane protein 31 confers protection against B. melitensis and B. ovis infection by eliciting a specific cytotoxic response. Infect Immun. 2005;73:6537–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Estein SM, Fiorentino MA, Paolicchi FA, Clausse M, Manazza J, Cassataro J, Giambartolomei GH, Coria LM, Zylberman V, Fossati CA, Kjeken R, Goldbaum FA. The polymeric antigen BLSOmp31 confers protection against Brucella ovis infection in rams. Vaccine. 2009;27:6704–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta VK, Rout PK, Vihan VS. Induction of immune response in mice with a DNA vaccine encoding outer membrane protein (omp31) of Brucella melitensis 16M. Res Vet Sci. 2007;82:305–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tiwari S, Kumar A, Thavaselvam D, Mangalgi S, Rathod V, Prakash A, Barua A, Arora S, Sathyaseelan K. Development and comparative evaluation of a plate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on recombinant outer membrane antigens Omp28 and Omp31 for diagnosis of human brucellosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20:1217–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang W, Wu J, Qiao J, Weng Y, Zhang H, Liao Q, Qiu J, Chen C, Allain JP, Li C. Evaluation of humoral and cellular immune responses to BP26 and OMP31 epitopes in the attenuated Brucella melitensis vaccinated sheep. Vaccine. 2014;32:825–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cloeckaert A, de Wergifosse P, Dubray G, Limet JN. Identification of seven surface-exposed Brucella outer membrane proteins by use of monoclonal antibodies: immunogold labeling for electron microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Infect Immun. 1990;58:3980–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Vizcaíno N, Kittelberger R, Cloeckaert A, Marín CM, Fernández-Lago L. Minor nucleotide substitutions in the omp31 gene of Brucella ovis result in antigenic differences in the major outer membrane protein that it encodes compared to those of the other Brucella species. Infect Immun. 2001;69:7020–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Estein SM, Cheves PC, Fiorentino MA, Cassataro J, Paolicchi FA, Bowden RA. Immunogenicity of recombinant Omp31 from Brucella melitensis in rams and serum bactericidal activity against B. ovis. Vet Microbiol. 2004;102:203–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Qiu J, Wang W, Wu J, Zhang H, Wang Y, Qiao J, Chen C, Gao GF, Allain JP, Li C. Characterization of periplasmic protein BP26 epitopes of Brucella melitensis reacting with murine monoclonal and sheep antibodies. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34246.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Abbas AK, Murphy KM, Sher A. Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature. 1996;383:787–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Banerjee K, Klasse PJ, Sanders RW, Pereyra F, Michael E, Lu M, Walker BD, Moore JP. IgG subclass profiles in infected HIV type 1 controllers and chronic progressors and in uninfected recipients of Env vaccines. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2010;26:445–58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Visciano ML, Tagliamonte M, Tornesello ML, Buonaguro FM, Buonaguro L. Effects of adjuvants on IgG subclasses elicited by virus-like particles. J Transl Med. 2012;10:4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Baldwin CL, Goenka R. Host immune responses to the intracellular bacteria Brucella, does the bacteria instruct the host to facilitate chronic infection? Crit Rev Immunol. 2006;26:407–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Durward MA, Harms J, Magnani DM, Eskra L, Splitter GA. Discordant Brucella melitensis antigens yield cognate CD8+ T cells in vivo. Infect Immun. 2010;78:168–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta VK, Radhakrishnan G, Harms J, Splitter G. Invasive Escherichia coli vaccines expressing Brucella melitensis outer membrane proteins 31 or 16 or periplasmic protein BP26 confer protection in mice challenged with B. melitensis. Vaccine. 2012;30:4017–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Pasquevich KA, Estein SM, García Samartino C, Zwerdling A, Coria LM, Barrionuevo P, Fossati CA, Giambartolomei GH, Cassataro J. Immunization with recombinant Brucella species outer membrane protein Omp16 or Omp19 in adjuvant induces specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as systemic and oral protection against Brucella abortus infection. Infect Immun. 2009;77:436–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bowden RA, Estein SM, Zygmunt MS, Dubray G, Cloeckaert A. Identification of protective outer membrane antigens of Brucella ovis by passive immunization of mice with monoclonal antibodies. Microbes Infect. 2000;2:481–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bowden RA, Cloeckaert A, Zygmunt MS, Bernard S, Dubray G. Surface exposure of outer membrane protein and lipopolysaccharide epitopes in Brucella species studied by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and flow cytometry. Infect Immun. 1995;63:3945–52.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Cassataro J, Pasquevich KA, Estein SM, Laplagne DA, Velikovsky CA, de la Barrera S, Bowden R, Fossati CA, Giambartolomei GH, Goldbaum FA. A recombinant subunit vaccine based on the insertion of 27 amino acids from Omp31 to the N-terminus of BLS induced a similar degree of protection against B. ovis than rev.1 vaccination. Vaccine. 2007;25:4437–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Patra KP, Saito M, Atluri VL, Rolán HG, Young B, Kerrinnes T, Smits H, Ricaldi JN, Gotuzzo E, Gilman RH, Tsolis RM, Vinetz JM. A protein-conjugate approach to develop a monoclonal antibody-based antigen detection test for the diagnosis of human brucellosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2926.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Castaño MJ, Solera J. Chronic brucellosis and persistence of Brucella melitensis DNA. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:2084–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Bian Y, Zhao S, Zhu S, Zeng J, Li T, Fu Y, Wang Y, Zheng X, Zhang L, Wang W, Yang B, Zhou Y, Allain JP, Li C. Significance of monoclonal antibodies against the conserved epitopes within non-structural protein 3 helicase of hepatitis C virus. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70214.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang L, Yin S, Tan W, Xiao D, Weng Y, Wang W, Li T, Shi J, Shuai L, Li H, Zhou J, Allain JP, Li C. Recombinant interferon-γ lentivirus co-infection inhibits adenovirus replication ex vivo. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42455.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement