Open Access

Correspondence between symptom development of Colletotrichum graminicola and fungal biomass, quantified by a newly developed qPCR assay, depends on the maize variety

  • Fabian Weihmann1,
  • Iris Eisermann1,
  • Rayko Becher1,
  • Jorrit-Jan Krijger1,
  • Konstantin Hübner1, 2,
  • Holger B. Deising1, 2 and
  • Stefan G. R. Wirsel1, 2Email author
BMC MicrobiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:94

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0709-4

Received: 18 May 2015

Accepted: 13 February 2016

Published: 23 May 2016

Abstract

Background

Penetration attempts of the hemibiotroph Colletotrichum graminicola may activate PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) on different cultivars of Zea mays to different extent. However, in most events, this does not prevent the establishment of a compatible pathogenic interaction. In this study, we investigate the extent to which the host variety influences PTI. Furthermore, we assess whether visual disease symptoms occurring on different maize varieties reliably reflect fungal biomass development in planta as determined by qPCR and GFP tracing.

Results

Employing a set of four maize varieties, which were selected from a panel of 27 varieties, for in-depth assessment of pathogenesis of the wild type strain of C. graminicola, revealed considerable differences in susceptibility as evidenced by symptom severity that decreased from variety Golden Jubilee to Mikado to Farmtop to B73. However, a newly developed qPCR assay and microscopical observation of a GFP-labelled strain showed that disease symptoms are in some instances inconsistent when compared with other indicators of susceptibility. Of the four varieties assessed, either Golden Jubilee, Mikado and B73, or Golden Jubilee, Farmtop and B73 showed a direct correlation between symptom and fungal biomass development. In a pairwise comparison, however, Mikado and Farmtop showed an inverse correlation for these features.

Conclusions

The genotype of maize contributes to the severity of symptoms resulting from an infection with C. graminicola. Partially, this may be attributed to the extent of PTI activated in different varieties, as reflected by papilla formation. Furthermore, when evaluating the susceptibility of a variety, it should be considered that symptom severity must not have to reflect the extent of fungal growth in the infected tissue.

Keywords

Colletotrichum graminicola Zea mays Maize Virulence PTI ETI Papilla

Background

The genus Colletotrichum comprises many important pathogenic fungi that typically cause anthracnose disease symptoms on aerial plant surfaces or post-harvest rots [1, 2]. Many species of that genus show a hemibiotrophic lifestyle that is characterized by a short initial biotrophic phase and a subsequent switch to necrotrophic proliferation. The causal agent of anthracnose leaf blight and stalk rot of maize, Colletotrichum graminicola (Ces.) G. W. Wils. (teleomorph Glomerella graminicola Politis), can potentially cause considerable losses of up to one billion U.S. dollars in the Americas per year [3]. Investigation of this pathosystem has been advanced by the recent annotations of the genomes of both the host and the fungus [4, 5].

Several plant defence responses have been characterized for the C. graminicola - maize pathosystem. Even in the compatible interaction, the invading pathogen does not remain fully undetected since host reactions such as the formation of papillae (callose-containing cell wall appositions), phytoalexins and H2O2, do occur at some degree during the biotrophic phase [69]. These observations led to the suggestion that the pathogen escapes such defence reactions by switching to necrotrophy [7]. This may imply that in contrast to obligate biotrophs the secreted effectors of this hemibiotroph may not allow for a sufficiently strong and lasting suppression of the host´s defence systems. Nevertheless, it is assumed that the establishment of a biotrophic phase may provide some advantages to the fungus. It is thus crucial to investigate the roles of effector proteins of C. graminicola during the different phases of pathogenesis.

However, assessment of mutants in candidate genes can be difficult. Besides the general problem of consistently quantifying symptom development, another challenge comes from the observation made in other pathosystems that disease severity may not always correlate with fungal biomass development within infected host tissues. This is for instance important in a scenario where a fungus proliferates in planta without causing apparent symptoms as in endophytes. On the other hand, the genotype of the host may also affect fungal virulence and the extent of symptom development.

Work comparing stalk rot in a susceptible and a resistant maize hybrid uncovered a correlation between the extent of macroscopic symptoms and ergosterol levels, as an indicator of fungal biomass [10]. However, an earlier study suggested that ergosterol contents often do not correlate well with fungal biomass [11]. Thus, an additional, convenient method such as qPCR would be helpful to assess reliably fungal biomass development in maize anthracnose.

We used the ITS2 region, which is a part of the fungal rDNA cluster, for the development and validation of a qPCR assay that is not only very sensitive but also highly specific so that interference with host DNA does not occur. This qPCR assay was employed to determine whether macroscopic symptom development of C. graminicola on four maize varieties, which were chosen from 27 varieties to represent gradually increasing levels of susceptibility, is reflected by fungal biomass accumulation. In addition, we employed a GFP-expressing C. graminicola strain to examine fungal proliferation in planta and compared this to the qPCR results. These experiments confirmed that fungal proliferation in the tested maize varieties diverges especially during early pathogenesis.

Results

Development of a qPCR assay to quantify C. graminicola biomass in planta

To employ proper quantification of fungal gDNA as a measure of fungal biomass in infected plant tissue, we initially developed and evaluated an optimised qPCR assay. This has been achieved in four subsequent steps as follows.
  1. (i)

    Primer design and evaluation. Primer Cg_ITS2-F1.1 and Cg_ITS2-R1 target the ITS2 region of the rDNA cluster with high specificity and provide high sensitivity, due to the presence of a predicted number of 60 rDNA repeats (http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/genome/colletotrichum_group/GenomeStats.html), for the quantification of gDNA of C. graminicola. PCR using these primers amplified a 98 bp fragment from gDNA of C. graminicola, but showed no products with the gDNA of Z. mays and pUC18 (Additional file 1A). In the following experiments, the plasmid served as a spike-in control where a known quantity of DNA was added to maize tissue samples just before DNA extraction. This has been used to compare the experimentally determined quantity of pUC18 to derive sample-specific correction factors that allowed proportionally correcting the experimentally determined quantity of fungal DNA for preparation-based inaccuracies. Sequencing of the PCR fragment confirmed the identity of the targeted ITS2 region (not shown). In addition, the primer pair M13new-For and M13new-Rev amplified a fragment of 105 bp from pUC18 DNA, but did not do so with DNA of the fungus or its host (Additional file 1B).

     
  2. (ii)

    Assessing calibration curves. Subsequent to validation of primer specificity, for both primer pairs qPCR calibration curves have been established with serial dilutions of fungal gDNAs made in 10 ng of Z. mays gDNA (containing ca. 4.3 x 103 copies) to simulate different degrees of colonisation of maize leaves by C. graminicola. We found a linear dynamic range in the ITS2 assay from 2 pg to 20 ng of C. graminicola gDNA, corresponding to ca. 2.2 x 102 to ca. 2.2 x 106 ITS2 copies (assuming 60 rDNA repeats per genome) in the maize DNA background (Fig. 1a). The PCR efficiency was 97 %. Calibration curve analysis of the assay for pUC18 resulted in a linear dynamic range from 0.5 fg to 5 ng of template DNA (ca. 1.8 x 102 to ca. 1.8 x 109 copies; Fig. 1b); the PCR efficiency was 103 %.

     
  3. (iii)

    Tissue sampling optimisation. Compared to spray inoculation of whole plants, point-inoculation of a defined number of spores onto detached leaves allows better control of variation of the resulting macroscopic symptoms in biological replicates. However, some variability remains and, thus, might limit the power of qPCR analyses. Therefore, using the qPCR assay described above we quantified variations of fungal development between different leaves and between different positions of inoculation on an individual leaf. To evaluate these variations, detached maize leaves were inoculated with six droplets set equidistantly along the segments, incubated for 96 h and analysed in two ways. Infection sites were excised and then either pooled per leaf (Fig. 2a) or pooled across different leaves according to the position of the inoculum (Fig. 2b). For both pooling strategies, qPCR-based calculation of fungal gDNA contents resulted in some variation. Whereas pools representing individual leaves exhibited random variation (Fig. 2a), pools representing distinct regions of infected leaves (Fig. 2b) showed a more systematic variation since tissue samples from the margins contained less fungal DNA than those from the middle. Moreover, in the across-leaves comparison, extreme values varied only by a factor of about three, whereas in the within-leaves comparison, extreme values varied by a factor of about ten. Variation coefficients in these experiments were 0.65 and 0.6, respectively. To reduce variations we tested another sampling scheme where only the middle of each leaf carried a single inoculation point. When using pools for qPCR analysis that comprised five individual infection sites on different leaves, the variation coefficient decreased to 0.44 (Fig. 2c). Thus, this optimised sampling strategy was used in all subsequent experiments.

     
  4. (iv)

    Evaluation of the new qPCR assay. To test the resolving power of the optimised qPCR assay, we compared the in planta biomass accumulation of the C. graminicola wild type strain with three previously recovered Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (ATMT) mutants [12] that were further characterised here. Southern blot analyses confirmed that each of the three mutants possessed a single T-DNA integration (not shown). The mutant strains, designated AT-1, AT-2 and AT-3, were chosen because they exhibited gradual reductions of virulence, i.e. visually assessable anthracnose symptoms on infected maize leaves (Fig. 3a). The infection process of these mutants was examined microscopically (Fig. 3b). At 24 hpi, conidia of all strains had germinated and differentiated appressoria. However, at 24 hpi strain AT-3 had formed only 30 % of the appressoria formed by the wild type strain, a difference that was statistically significant (Student's t-test, p ≤ 0.05). Most of the few appressoria of this strain appeared deformed (Fig. 3b). The development of strain AT-3 appeared arrested at the appressorial stage suggesting a failure to penetrate the plant epidermis. In contrast, strains AT-1 and AT-2 progressed through morphogenesis similar to the wild type. They showed secondary necrotrophic hyphae, conidiophores and setae at 72 hpi and 120 hpi, respectively (Fig. 3b).

     
Fig. 1

Calibration curves of qPCR. Data provide means, error bars standard deviations. A) gDNA of C. graminicola isolated from three independent cultures was serially diluted twice in a constant amount of 10 ng of gDNA of Z. mays Mikado. Each dilution was measured twice, giving a total of 12 values for each concentration. B) Plasmid pUC18 was serially diluted in 10 ng of gDNA of Z. mays and measured thrice, giving three values for each concentration

Fig. 2

Effects of tissue pooling on qPCR results. Upper part shows infection sites on detached maize leaves at 96 hpi and the indicated pooling schemes for DNA extraction. The lower part shows the results of the corresponding qPCRs that used 10 ng of total DNA from each pool. An individual column represents the absolute amount of fungal DNA determined in the leaf disc pool that is boxed with the same colour in the upper part. Grey columns represent the calculated means and standard errors (SE) for data merged from all pools. a Six excised tissue samples were combined from individual leaves. b Excised tissue samples were combined from five different leaves each carrying six infection sites, according to the position of the inoculum on the leaf. c Excised tissue samples were combined from five leaves each carrying a single infection site in its middle

Fig. 3

Effects of mutations affecting virulence on qPCR results. Three ATMT mutants (AT-1, AT-2 and AT-3) were inoculated on maize variety Mikado and compared to the wild type reference. a Symptoms occurring at 120 hpi. b Light microscopy of infection sites after staining with aniline blue. Arrowheads indicate appressoria, arrows invasive secondary hyphae and asterisks acervuli. Photographs shown in a and b provide representative results from five repeated experiments each using four leaves per variant. c Result of qPCR using 10 ng of total DNA as template. Columns represent means of five independent experiments. For each experiment, eight leaf discs excised from individual leaves carrying a single inoculation site at their middle were pooled. Error bars indicate standard errors. Letters assess variation between the strains at a given time, which was determined by multiple comparisons using the Student-Newman-Keuls test. Different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05

Results from qPCR corresponded with the macroscopic and microscopic observations (Fig. 3c). The amount of DNA of strain AT-3 did not increase significantly over time, supporting the idea that this mutant had a penetration arrest and that it was therefore unable to propagate in planta. In the wild type and in mutant strains AT-1 and AT-2, fungal DNA levels developed uniformly from 24 to 72 hpi. From 72 hpi onwards, i.e. with the microscopically observed establishment of the necrotrophic infection stage, fungal proliferation within the maize leaves considerably accelerated for the wild type strain. In contrast, biomass of strains AT-1 and AT-2 increased much slower during this phase and that of AT-3 did not increase at all. At 120 hpi, the differences between the wild type and all mutants were statistically significant and amounted to factors of eight for AT-1, four for AT-2 and 34 for AT-3 (Fig. 3c). These experiments confirmed that the newly developed qPCR assay described here reliably quantifies fungal DNA contents in infected host tissues and is thus able to monitor fungal development altered by mutations affecting virulence.

Anthracnose symptom development on different maize varieties

To select a set of maize varieties with clear differences in disease susceptibility for subsequent analysis of a possible correlation between macroscopic symptoms and the underlying fungal biomass development, we evaluated 27 different maize varieties by detached leaf infection assays using the C. graminicola wild type strain (Additional file 2). The extent to which symptoms developed differed remarkably among the varieties tested (Fig. 4). At 4 dpi, 22 varieties showed black-coloured lesions at the inoculation sites, which harboured acervuli with melanised setae. However, among these varieties symptom intensity differed with regard to lesion size and level of discoloration. The remaining five maize varieties (NK Nekta, Farmoso, Farmtop, Saludo and B73) did not clearly show such macroscopic symptoms at 4 dpi.
Fig. 4

Screening of maize varieties for susceptibility to C. graminicola. Symptoms as occurring at 96 hpi. For each host variety, representative leaves are shown. Highlighted varieties were chosen for further experiments. This experiment was performed twice, each using three plants per variety. Leaves shown are representative results

We chose four maize varieties strongly differing in disease susceptibility, i.e. Golden Jubilee, Mikado, Farmtop and B73 (highlighted in Fig. 4) to monitor the time-course of symptom development from 24 to 120 hpi (Fig. 5a). As seen above, the highly susceptible varieties Golden Jubilee and Mikado showed clear disease symptoms at 96 hpi. The former variety allowed for the fastest symptom development out of the four chosen. At 120 hpi, the anthracnose symptoms were more prominent on Golden Jubilee than on Mikado. At 120 hpi, weaker symptoms appeared also on Farmtop but almost none on B73 (Fig. 5a). In addition, we quantified microscopically fungal pathogenesis and defences of the four maize varieties. The ability to form germ tubes and appressoria on leaves was not much affected by the variety inoculated (Fig. 5b). However, host defence reactions differed between the varieties and this influenced the efficiency at which the fungus penetrated epidermal cells (Fig. 5b, c). Whereas Golden Jubilee formed basically no papillae, the other three varieties respectively responded to attempted fungal penetration at rates between 7 % and 21 %. Roughly half of these structures were effective, i.e. they blocked further fungal ingress (Fig. 5b, Additional file 3). Hypersensitive responses (HR) were only very rarely observed (<1 %) without distinct differences between the varieties. The frequencies of successful fungal penetration were significantly higher on Golden Jubilee than on B73 and Mikado. Interestingly, Farmtop allowed for higher penetration rates not only when compared to B73 but trendwise also when compared to Mikado, though the symptoms developing on Farmtop were milder than on Mikado (Fig. 5a, b). In cases of successful penetration, thick biotrophic hyphae spread beyond the first invaded epidermal cell in all varieties. Treatment of infected tissue samples with diaminobenzidine (DAB) to detect hydrogen peroxide stained host cell walls especially when conidia were found at higher density (Fig. 5d). Apparent differences between the varieties were not observed. Spray inoculation of whole plants resulted in differences in symptom severity between the four varieties that corresponded to those observed in the leaf segment assays (data not shown).
Fig. 5

Influence of host genotype on symptoms, pathogenesis and qPCR results. Comparison of pathogenesis of the wild type reference strain on four maize varieties. a) Representative infection sites as observed at the indicated time points. b) Quantitation of fungal morphogenesis and host defence reactions. Columns give means of four biological replicates performed in different weeks, each in three technical replicates representing different leaves. On each leaf, infection structures developing from 100 conidia and the corresponding host responses were counted. Error bars provide standard errors. Letters assess variation between host varieties at 2 dpi, which was determined by multiple comparisons using the Student-Newman-Keuls test. Different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05. c) Fluorescence microscopy using UV2A filter exhibits whitish papillae and dark appressoria (600×). Arrows indicate papillae. Bars represent 50 μm. d) Fluorescence microscopy using UV2A filter and autowhite function on DAB-stained tissues exhibits sites of hydrogen peroxide production (200×). Results from the other two varieties were similar to those shown. Bars represent 100 μm. e) Results of qPCR using 10 ng of total DNA as template. Each column represents the absolute amount of fungal DNA that was averaged from five leaf disc pools. Each pool comprised eight leaf discs excised from individual leaves carrying a single inoculation site at their middle. Error bars indicate standard errors. Letters assess variation between host varieties at a given time as determined by the Student-Newman-Keuls test. Different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05

Comparison of fungal development on different host varieties by qPCR and GFP tracing

To determine whether and how the observed differences in symptom and infection structure development on the four maize varieties corresponded to fungal biomass accumulation, we employed qPCR on DNA extracted from small excised leaf discs carrying the infection sites. Paralleling the symptom development (Fig. 5a), until 48 hpi fungal DNA remained at low, constant levels in all varieties tested (Fig. 5e). At 72 hpi, fungal DNA amounts had increased significantly in the highly susceptible variety Golden Jubilee, but also somewhat in Mikado and Farmtop. On variety B73, the onset of fungal proliferation was delayed since a substantial increase of C. graminicola DNA was not seen until 96 hpi. At 72 hpi and 96 hpi, fungal biomass was significantly higher in Golden Jubilee than in all other varieties. This correlates well with the early and strong symptom development and the scarceness of visible defence responses observed in this variety. However, for the variety Farmtop, both qPCR (Fig. 5e) and penetration rates (Fig. 5b) indicated a rather efficient establishment of the infection, although symptom development remained considerably weaker throughout the experiment in comparison to Golden Jubilee and Mikado. Moreover, levels of fungal DNA in variety B73 at 120 hpi (Fig. 5e) indicated growth of C. graminicola during later phases of infection that did, however, only led to very weak symptoms (Fig. 5a).

To substantiate the obtained qPCR data on fungal proliferation, plant infection assays were subsequently performed with a GFP-expressing strain of C. graminicola. To allow for constitutive GFP expression, we created this strain by homologous integration of a cassette carrying a fusion of the eGFP marker gene to a promotor fragment of the ToxB gene of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis [13] at an intergenic locus within a genomic region that most likely comprises constitutively expressed genes [4] (Additional file 4). Virulence on corn and vegetative growth in vitro of this strain did not differ significantly from those of the wild type reference (not shown). Fluorescence microscopy was performed on infection sites at 72 hpi, 96 hpi and 120 hpi (Fig. 6). Matching the qPCR results (Fig. 5e), at 72 hpi clear green fluorescence signals provided evidence for a well-established and spreading C. graminicola infection only in Golden Jubilee. Signal strength and expansion had increased in this variety at 96 hpi. As the fungus spread longitudinally, at 120 hpi fluorescence signals arising from the inoculation point remained at similar levels.
Fig. 6

Growth of GFP-labelled C. graminicola on different host genotypes. Comparison of pathogenesis on four maize varieties infected by a C. graminicola strain constitutively expressing GFP. Infection sites were observed using a stereoscope with white light and fluorescence illumination at the indicated time points. From two experiments made, each using eight leaves per time point, three representative examples are shown per variant

In contrast to Golden Jubilee, fluorescence signals of the infection sites were rather weak at 72 hpi in varieties Mikado and Farmtop, indicating slower proliferation. Nevertheless, they became clearly visible at 96 hpi and had further spread at 120 hpi. Although the expansion of mycelia appeared comparable, fluorescence intensity appeared more pronounced on Mikado compared to Farmtop. This was linked to the higher number of acervuli produced on the former, which led to more focused GFP signals. In contrast to the other three varieties tested, infection of B73 with the GFP labelled strain resulted in a later and weaker emission of green fluorescence. Only at the last time point at 120 hpi, the mycelium had spread to an extent that was comparable to Mikado or Farmtop at 96 hpi reflecting the qPCR data (see Fig. 5e). Similar to Farmtop, acervuli appeared quite scarcely in B73 until 120 hpi. Taken together, we observed that the spreading of the GFP fluorescence signals reflected better the increase of fungal biomass as determined by qPCR than visual symptom development.

Discussion

Using a qPCR assay and a GFP-labelled strain, we assessed differences in the proliferation of C. graminicola on several varieties of its host maize. We found that fungal biomass accumulation in planta varies considerably less than implied by the remarkable differences in symptom development observed on the tested maize varieties. This suggests a contribution of the host genotype to the extent of disease symptoms in this pathosystem.

Of 27 host varieties exhibiting a large range of susceptibilities to C. graminicola as indicated by disease severity, we have chosen four to compare the developments of fungal gDNA contents, infection structures and disease symptoms. At the high end of susceptibility is the variety Golden Jubilee followed by Mikado and then by Farmtop. Finally, we included the variety B73 since it appeared at the low end of susceptibility and since it had been used to establish the genome sequence of maize [5]. By employing qPCR and GFP experiments, we found that massive fungal proliferation indicative for necrotrophy initiated not earlier than 48 hpi on any of the four maize varieties tested. After that time, clear differences between them became obvious. Whereas the fungus did not proliferate on maize B73 until 72 hpi, it had already expanded noticeably by then on Golden Jubilee. This discrepancy correlates with the frequencies observed for successful fungal penetration and the lack of host defence reactions in the latter. One may assume that such differences of fungal proliferation in planta will inevitably result in corresponding differences in symptom development. However, this was not the case in the maize varieties Mikado and Farmtop that exhibited comparable fungal gDNA contents and mycelia, but remarkably different disease symptoms. Thus, fungal proliferation over time is not necessarily reflected by symptom development.

Past research had also noticed big differences in the speed and intensity of symptom development after inoculating C. graminicola on 183 maize varieties, which did not include any of those tested here [14]. Differences in susceptibility may link to varying rates at which phenolics accumulate in infected maize tissue [15]. Maize is known to produce a range of secondary metabolites acting as phytoalexins and phytoanticipins, such as benzoxazinones, zealexins and kauralexins [1618]. This suggests that C. graminicola may encounter toxic secondary metabolites when colonising maize and it must therefore employ currently unknown mechanisms, such as degradation or extrusion to overcome their impact. Future experiments need to assess, whether the timing and the levels of secondary metabolites differ in maize varieties in such a way that it may explain the divergences observed in the proliferation of C. graminicola in planta.

Beyond the production of antifungal compounds, maize may attempt to ward off the invading pathogen by forming papillae or by an HR, the extent of which may vary with the host genotype. Papillae are considered a defence response of the PTI [19], which is induced when PAMPs of the invading pathogen are recognised by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [20, 21]. Papillae may form at some frequency even in compatible interactions. On the other hand, HR typically results from recognition of the pathogen as part of the effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [21]. Recently, it was suggested that the differences between PTI and ETI may be less distinct than initially considered [22], as some PAMPs may also provoke HR. In contrast to many other pathosystems, no clear HR has been reported for the C. graminicola-maize interaction, although maize is capable of HR to promote race-specific resistance to the rust Puccinia sorghi [23, 24].

It is not resolved whether C. graminicola may overcome or avoid the PTI by suppression of host defence signalling, by the masking or modification of its PAMPs or by a combination of this [9]. It is noteworthy that the high susceptibility of Golden Jubilee correlates with the lack of visible defence reactions, which may suggest that this maize variety may have a reduced ability to detect the pathogen or to mount defences that would delay fungal development in infected host tissues. In contrast to evidence of PTI occurring in the pathosystem C. graminicola - maize, ETI as indicated by a gene-for-gene resistance has not been reported. Using the 27 maize varieties tested in this study, we neither observed HR as a visible sign of gene-for-gene resistance.

Support for the notion of an active plant defence even during the biotrophic phase of C. graminicola came from work showing that the transcript levels of some defence-related genes such as ZmPR1, ZmPR4b, ZmPR5 and ZmAChit begin to rise as early as 24 hpi [7]. Moreover, a study on 44 defence- and stress-related genes in infected maize leaves confirmed transcript levels of ZmPR1, ZmPR3, ZmPR5 and ZmPR10 to increase already during the biotrophic phase of C. graminicola, whereas others, such as ZmBx1, ZmIGL and ZmCHS C2, were found decreased [25]. The latter encode enzymes involved in the synthesis of phytoalexins and phytoanticipins. Metabolome profiling of infected leaves performed in the same study suggested that maize is able to mount defence reactions already during the biotrophic phase but C. graminicola seems to be able to avoid or overcome them eventually.

Ustilago maydis, which also infects maize, has a much longer biotrophic phase than C. graminicola. Nevertheless, during the earliest phase of infection this basidiomycete also evokes responses in the host such as autofluorescence and transcriptional induction of defence-related genes indicating the recognition of the pathogen [26]. However, many of these genes were downregulated after 24 h suggesting that U. maydis had initiated the suppression of the host´s PTI. Further evidence for suppression by U. maydis came from secreted effectors targeting distinct defence pathways of maize [2729]. Another study found suppression of PR-1 and TPS6 (sesquiterpene cyclase) in maize leaves infected with U. maydis but not with C. graminicola [30]. In consideration of these studies, defence suppression may play a lesser role in C. graminicola than in U. maydis, which infects the same host. However, since reports from other Colletotrichum species indicated a contribution of defence suppression in their interactions with compatible hosts it remains unsettled to which degree this mechanism is important for the pathogenesis of C. graminicola [3133].

Another possible way to establish a compatible interaction despite the host´s PTI is its avoidance through the modification of PAMPs such as fungal chitin, β-1,3-glucan and ergosterol [9, 22, 3436]. For instance, LysM effectors that were also found in Colletotrichum spp. bind chitin fragments to prevent the elicitation of PTI [37]. Additional evidence in C. graminicola for an avoidance of PTI is the conversion of chitin to chitosan after penetration of the host surface [38] and the down-regulation of β-glucan synthesis during biotrophy [9]. Thus, avoidance contributes to the biotrophy of C. graminicola by diminishing the PTI of maize.

In this study, we designed and validated a qPCR assay that offers high sensitivity and specificity for the measurement of fungal biomass in infected plant tissues. Although fungal-specific molecules such as ergosterol, chitin and certain phospholipid fatty acids have been used to estimate biomass, this approach requires that the amounts of these biomarkers do not vary between different fungal cell types formed during pathogenesis and between different physiological conditions, assumptions that must be treated with caution [11, 39, 40]. Several reports compared the reliability of qPCR-based biomass determination to those using the mentioned biomarkers. Most of these concluded that qPCR is superior, others found both approaches appropriate [3946].

Conclusions

This study shows that development of C. graminicola in infected maize tissues can be better estimated from qPCR and GFP tracing experiments than from macroscopic symptom development. The new qPCR assay will be useful in several circumstances. First, it can reveal relatively subtle differences between genetically engineered mutants and the wild type reference with respect to the development of fungal biomass during pathogenesis. This will be valuable for the analysis of candidate genes, which may only have a minor contribution to overall virulence. Second, it may be important to assess specifically the effect of an introduced mutation on several host varieties in order to identify reliably all possible deviations from the wild type reference. Finally, also plant breeders screening in maize for an improved resistance against C. graminicola may consider that visual inspection of symptom development may not suffice to select optimal host genotypes.

Methods

Plant and fungal cultivation

Fungal strains included the wild-type reference strain CgM1.001 (formerly CgM2) of Colletotrichum graminicola (Ces.) Wilson (teleomorph Glomerella graminicola (Politis)) and mutant strains derived thereof by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (ATMT) [12]. Mutant strains, which were originally assigned as AT2.463, AT2.374 and AT2.276, were designated as AT-1, AT-2 and AT-3 throughout this study.

Varieties of maize (Zea mays L.) used for inoculation were B73 (ARS-USDA, Ames, Iowa, USA), Mikado (KWS Saat AG, Einbeck, Germany), Golden Jubilee (Territorial Seed Company, Cottage Grove, OR) and Farmtop (FarmSaat AG, Everswinkel, Germany). Further varieties used in Fig. 4 are listed in Additional file 2.

Conditions for cultivation of the fungus and maize in the greenhouse as well as in environmentally controlled growth chambers had been described [8].

Creation of a C. graminicola GFP strain

For construction of a C. graminicola strain carrying an eGFP marker cassette whose expression levels are only minimally influenced by the genomic position of the integration site and developmental stage the annotated genome [4] was screened for loci fulfilling as fully as possible the following conditions. First, the site chosen for the targeted integration of the cassette should be an intergenic region between 1 and 2 kb in length to allow for sufficiently long flanking regions for homologous recombination that do not overlap with coding sequences while minimising the risk of presence of unidentified features that could lead to phenotypes when disrupted. For this second reason, the genes on the left and on the right should also preferably have a convergent orientation. Finally, the integration site should reside in a genomic region rich in more or less constitutively expressed genes indicating a constitutively euchromatic state, which was examined on the basis of gene annotations and published transcriptome data [4]. One such locus, between genes GLRG_03632 and GLRG_03633 on Supercontig 11 (Additional file 4) was chosen as target region. The eGFP expression cassette was constructed using the Golden Gate system for one-step restriction/ligation cloning of multiple fragments [47]. Left and right flanks of the target site were amplified from CgM1.001 genomic DNA using primer pairs BSA-Ekt5'-pBR322 and BSA-Ekt5'-Prom and, respectively, BSA-Ekt3'-G418 and BSA-Ekt3'-pBR322 (Additional file 5). The eGFP encoding ORF was amplified from plasmid pSM1 [48] using primers BSA-GFP.F1-Prom and BSA-GFP.R3-Tnos. The strong constitutive ToxB promoter from Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, chosen to drive eGFP expression, was amplified from 1026244_P-ToxB_pMA-T (Susanne Köllmer, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle, unpublished) using primers BSA-PtoxA-Ekt5' and BSA-ToxA.R1-GFP. The nos terminator was amplified from p123-mcherry [49] using primers BSA-Tnos.F1-GFP and BSA-Tnos.R2-Sel. A geneticin (G418) resistance cassette, consisting of the neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) gene under control of the Aspergillus nidulans trpC promoter and terminator, was amplified from plasmid pII99 [50] using primers BSA-G418.F1-Tnos and BSA-G418-Ekt3'. The target vector for insertion of multi-fragment constructs by Golden Gate cloning, pBR322-Bsa, was generated by amplifying pBR322 with primers pBR322-For and pBR322-Rev, followed by XhoI-digestion of the PCR product and self-ligation. Finally, pBR322-Bsa and the PtoxB, eGFP, Tnos and resistance cassette fragments were mixed in equimolar concentrations and BsaI-digested/ligated [47]. After transformation in chemocompetent E. coli DH5alpha, plasmids were purified and verified by restriction digestion and PCR analyses. Correct plasmids were pooled and used as PCR template with primers Uni-Ekt-For and Uni-Ekt-Rev to generate a linear fragment that was transformed into C. graminicola M1.001 employing established procedures [51]. All primers were synthesised by biomers.net GmbH (Ulm, Germany) and are listed in Additional file 5.

Plant infection assay

Infection of maize by C. graminicola strains was assessed using a detached leaf assay. Fourteen days after sowing, segments (~8 cm) of third leaves were harvested and placed onto moistened filter paper in plastic petri dishes of 14 cm diameter. Fungal inoculum was produced by washing conidia off from OMA plates with 0.02 % (v/v) Tween 20. For qPCR analysis, 10 μl droplets of a conidial suspension adjusted to 106 conidia/ml were inoculated, the petri dishes were sealed with parafilm and incubated at 23 °C in the dark for up to 120 h. Infected tissue samples were harvested with a cork borer having a diameter of 8 mm. Finally, pools comprising five to eight tissue discs were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. For microscopic analysis (see below), inoculation applied essentially the same procedure but used suspensions of 105 conidia/ml.

Isolation of genomic DNA

Frozen fungal or plant material was ground in a TissueLyser (QIAGEN GmbH AG, Hilden, Germany) for 30 s at 30 Hz by two steel balls (HECHT Kugellager GmbH & Co. KG, Winnenden, Germany) having diameters of 3 mm. Isolation of total genomic DNA utilised the peqGOLD Plant DNA Mini Kit (PEQLAB Biotechnologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). Just before the addition of the first buffer of the kit, the ground samples were spiked with 10 μl of pUC18 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) adjusted to 5 pg/μl. This served as an external standard to control and to correct for putative DNA losses throughout the extraction procedure. Correction was achieved by assessing and applying sample-specific qPCR normalization factors as given below. The final volume of each DNA preparation was 100 μl. Concentration of the DNA preparation was assessed by a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

Design and validation of primers for qPCR

Due to its multi-copy occurrence in the genome promoting an increased sensitivity of the assay and its specificity, the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the ribosomal RNA-coding DNA (= rDNA) was chosen as the target for qPCR amplification. Based on the rDNA sequences of C. graminicola (GenBank: EU400146.1) and Z. mays (GenBank: DQ683016.1), several ITS1 and ITS2 primer pairs specific to C. graminicola were derived using the software Clone Manager (version 9.0; Scientific & Educational Software, Cary, NC, USA). Primers were designed to amplify fragments of about 100 bp and to have annealing temperatures of 60 °C, which is the recommended temperature for the used qPCR kit (see below). In conventional PCR pre-tests (35 cycles) that used DreamTaq DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific), the primer pairs were analysed for putative cross-reactions with the non-template DNAs from Z. mays (uninfected) and pUC18. The primer pair producing optimal results was Cg_ITS2-F1.1 and Cg_ITS2-R1 and was thus further on applied. The primers M13new-For and M13new-Rev were confirmed to be specific for pUC18 excluding the possibility of cross-reactions with the gDNA of C. graminicola and Z. mays. All primers were synthesised by biomers.net GmbH (Ulm, Germany) and are listed in Additional file 5.

qPCR analysis

We employed the Power SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and the iCycler model MyiQ Single color (Bio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, München, Germany) according to manufacturer's protocols. CT values that were the basis for subsequent quantifications were assessed by the iCycler software iQ5 (version 2.0, Bio-Rad). Reaction volumes of 20 μl included 1 μl of diluted DNA template and 0.1 μM of each primer. Reaction conditions were 10 min at 95 °C for the activation of the polymerase, followed by 50 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s with data collection.

To establish calibration curves, serial dilutions of either pure fungal gDNA ranging from 2 pg/μl to 20 ng/μl, or pure pUC18 plasmid DNA (Thermo Fisher Scientific) ranging from 0.5 fg/μl to 5 ng/μl were mixed with a constant amount of 10 ng of genomic DNA isolated from uninfected maize leaves. Calibration curves were assessed by calculating the linear function relating CT values (averaged from 3 technical repeats) to their corresponding logarithmic transformed DNA amounts. In addition to the CT values, the RFU (= Relative Fluorescence units) threshold values for each of the two PCR experiments have been assessed by iQ5 analysis, i.e. 59.3 (C. graminicola gDNA), respectively 143.35 (pUC18). Furthermore, reaction efficiencies were calculated with the formula E = (10−1/m-1)x100%, where m described the slope of the calibration curve.

For the absolute quantification of fungal DNA in infected tissue samples, for each DNA preparation two qPCR reactions were run separately, i.e. one applying the primer pair Cg_ITS2-F1.1 and Cg_ITS2-R1, and the second M13new-For and M13new-Rev. Prior to qPCR analysis, genomic DNA preparations were diluted to 10–20 ng/μl. Raw data were adjusted by applying the same threshold values applied to calculate the respective calibration curves (see above). The resulting CT values were then used to calculate the absolute amount of target DNA in a given reaction. Based on the expectation that 1 μl of undiluted sample DNA would contain 0.5 pg of plasmid DNA if the recovery rate would be 100 %, sample specific correction factors were determined as the ratio of the expected to the obtained pUC18 concentration. Finally, the correction as well as the dilution factors were applied to calculate the total amount of C. graminicola DNA in each leaf sample comprising six leaf discs as mentioned above. Calculations and subsequent statistical analyses employed the softwares Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond, USA) and XLSTAT (Addinsoft, Andernach, Germany).

Microscopy

Fungal morphogenesis in infected maize was examined microscopically using tissues samples from detached leaf assays as described above. Prior to observation, samples were fixed and bleached in ethanol-acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 24 h and then stained in 0.1 % aniline blue for 10 min. After washing for 5 min in water, samples were stored in 20 % glycerol at 4 °C. Bright field and fluorescence microscopy employed a Nikon Eclipse 600 microscope equipped with appropriate filter systems (Nikon GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany). Photographs were taken with a CCD-camera Digital Sight DS-Fi1 (Nikon) and were analysed with the software NIS-Elements D (version 2.30, Nikon). Production of hydrogen peroxide in infected tissues was visualised by DAB staining as reported previously [52].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) provided in the framework of the SFB 648 (project A5) and a grant from the Federal state of Sachsen-Anhalt provided in the framework of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Crop Plant Research (Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Nutzpflanzenforschung; IZN, project 8). Additional support came from the DFG in the framework of the priority program FOR 666. Steffen Münch kindly provided the ATMT mutants. Diana Gottschling helped to create the GFP-labelled strain. We thank Andrea Beutel for technical assistance and Elke Vollmer for greenhouse service.

Authors’ contributions

FW carried out the experiments of this study, except those documented in Figs. 5 and 6, which were performed by IE and KH, and took part in writing the manuscript. RB participated in data analysis and took part in writing the manuscript. JJK participated in conceiving and coordinating experimental work, and took part in writing the manuscript. HBD provided materials and took part in writing the manuscript. SGRW conceived and coordinated the study, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institut für Agrar- und Ernährungswissenschaften, Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät III, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
(2)
Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Nutzpflanzenforschung (IZN), Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg

References

  1. Hyde KD, Cai L, McKenzie EHC, Yang YL, Zhang JZ, Prihastuti H. Colletotrichum: a catalogue of confusion. Fungal Divers. 2009;39:1–17.Google Scholar
  2. Latunde-Dada AO. Colletotrichum: tales of forcible entry, stealth, transient confinement and breakout. Mol Plant Pathol. 2001;2:187–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Frey TJ, Weldekidan T, Colbert T, Wolters PJCC, Hawk JA. Fitness evaluation of Rcg1, a locus that confers resistance to Colletotrichum graminicola (Ces.) G.W. Wils. using near-isogenic maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 2011;51:1551–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. O'Connell RJ, Thon MR, Hacquard S, Amyotte SG, Kleemann J, Torres MF, et al. Lifestyle transitions in plant pathogenic Colletotrichum fungi deciphered by genome and transcriptome analyses. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1060–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei FS, Pasternak S, et al. The B73 maize genome: Complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science. 2009;326:1112–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mims CW, Vaillancourt LJ. Ultrastructural characterization of infection and colonization of maize leaves by Colletotrichum graminicola, and by a C. graminicola pathogenicity mutant. Phytopathology. 2002;92:803–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Vargas WA, Martin JM, Rech GE, Rivera LP, Benito EP, Diaz-Minguez JM, et al. Plant defense mechanisms are activated during biotrophic and necrotrophic development of Colletotricum graminicola in maize. Plant Physiol. 2012;158:1342–58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Behr M, Humbeck K, Hause G, Deising HB, Wirsel SGR. The hemibiotroph Colletotrichum graminicola locally induces photosynthetically active green islands but globally accelerates senescence on aging maize leaves. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010;23:879–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Oliveira-Garcia E, Deising HB. Infection structure-specific expression of beta-1,3-Glucan synthase is essential for pathogenicity of Colletotrichum graminicola and evasion of beta-glucan-triggered immunity in maize. Plant Cell. 2013;25:2356–78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Muimba-Kankolongo A, Bergstrom GC. Reduced anthracnose stalk rot in resistant maize is associated with restricted development of Colletotrichum graminicola in pith tissues. J Phytopathol. 2011;159:329–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bermingham S, Maltby L, Cooke RC. A critical assessment of the validity of ergosterol as an indicator of fungal biomass. Mycol Res. 1995;99:479–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Münch S, Ludwig N, Floss DS, Sugui JA, Koszucka AM, Voll LM, et al. Identification of virulence genes in the corn pathogen Colletotrichum graminicola by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Mol Plant Pathol. 2011;12:43–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Martinez JP, Ottum SA, Ali S, Franci LJ, Ciuffetti LM. Characterization of the ToxB gene from Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2001;14:675–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nicholson RL, Warren HL. Criteria for evaluation of resistance to maize anthracnose. Phytopathology. 1976;66:86–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammerschmidt R, Nicholson RL. Resistance of maize to anthracnose - Changes in host phenols and pigments. Phytopathology. 1977;67:251–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Huffaker A, Kaplan F, Vaughan MM, Dafoe NJ, Ni X, Rocca JR, et al. Novel acidic sesquiterpenoids constitute a dominant class of pathogen-induced phytoalexins in maize. Plant Physiol. 2011;156:2082–97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Oikawa A, Ishihara A, Tanaka C, Mori N, Tsuda M, Iwamura H. Accumulation of HDMBOA-Glc is induced by biotic stresses prior to the release of MBOA in maize leaves. Phytochemistry. 2004;65:2995–3001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schmelz EA, Kaplan F, Huffaker A, Dafoe NJ, Vaughan MM, Ni XZ, et al. Identity, regulation, and activity of inducible diterpenoid phytoalexins in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:5455–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Underwood W. The plant cell wall: a dynamic barrier against pathogen invasion. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3:85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Newman MA, Sundelin T, Nielsen JT, Erbs G. MAMP (microbe-associated molecular pattern) triggered immunity in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:139.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones JDG, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444:323–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Thomma BP, Nürnberger T, Joosten MH. Of PAMPs and effectors: the blurred PTI-ETI dichotomy. Plant Cell. 2011;23:4–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Negeri A, Wang GF, Benavente L, Kibiti CM, Chaikam V, Johal G, et al. Characterization of temperature and light effects on the defense response phenotypes associated with the maize Rp1-D21 autoactive resistance gene. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Bennetzen JL, Blevins WE, Ellingboe AH. Cell-autonomous recognition of the rust pathogen determines Rp1-specified resistance in maize. Science. 1988;241:208–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Balmer D, de Papajewski DV, Planchamp C, Glauser G, Mauch-Mani B. Induced resistance in maize is based on organ-specific defence responses. Plant J. 2013;74:213–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Doehlemann G, Wahl R, Horst RJ, Voll LM, Usadel B, Poree F, et al. Reprogramming a maize plant: transcriptional and metabolic changes induced by the fungal biotroph Ustilago maydis. Plant J. 2008;56:181–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hemetsberger C, Herrberger C, Zechmann B, Hillmer M, Doehlemann G. The Ustilago maydis effector Pep1 suppresses plant immunity by inhibition of host peroxidase activity. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002684.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Mueller AN, Ziemann S, Treitschke S, Assmann D, Doehlemann G. Compatibility in the Ustilago maydis-maize interaction requires inhibition of host cysteine proteases by the fungal effector Pit2. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003177.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Djamei A, Schipper K, Rabe F, Ghosh A, Vincon V, Kahnt J, et al. Metabolic priming by a secreted fungal effector. Nature. 2011;478:395–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Basse CW. Dissecting defense-related and developmental transcriptional responses of maize during Ustilago maydis infection and subsequent tumor formation. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:1774–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Stephenson SA, Hatfield J, Rusu AG, Maclean DJ, Manners JM. CgDN3: an essential pathogenicity gene of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides necessary to avert a hypersensitive-like response in the host Stylosanthes guianensis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000;13:929–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Yoshino K, Irieda H, Sugimoto F, Yoshioka H, Okuno T, Takano Y. Cell death of Nicotiana benthamiana is induced by secreted protein NIS1 of Colletotrichum orbiculare and is suppressed by a homologue of CgDN3. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012;25:625–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kleemann J, Rincon-Rivera LJ, Takahara H, Neumann U, Ver Loren van Themaat E, van der Does HC, et al. Sequential delivery of host-induced virulence effectors by appressoria and intracellular hyphae of the phytopathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002643.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Fujikawa T, Sakaguchi A, Nishizawa Y, Kouzai Y, Minami E, Yano S, et al. Surface alpha-1,3-glucan facilitates fungal stealth infection by interfering with innate immunity in plants. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002882.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Wan J, Zhang XC, Stacey G. Chitin signaling and plant disease resistance. Plant Signal Behav. 2008;3:831–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Lochman J, Mikes V. Ergosterol treatment leads to the expression of a specific set of defence-related genes in tobacco. Plant Mol Biol. 2006;62:43–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. de Jonge R, Thomma BP. Fungal LysM effectors: extinguishers of host immunity? Trends Microbiol. 2009;17:151–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. El Gueddari NE, Rauchhaus U, Moerschbacher BM, Deising HB. Developmentally regulated conversion of surface-exposed chitin to chitosan in cell walls of plant pathogenic fungi. New Phytol. 2002;156:103–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Lang-Yona N, Dannemiller K, Yamamoto N, Burshtein N, Peccia J, Yarden O, et al. Annual distribution of allergenic fungal spores in atmospheric particulate matter in the Eastern Mediterranean; a comparative study between ergosterol and quantitative PCR analysis. Atmos Chem Phys. 2012;12:2681–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Landeweert R, Veenman C, Kuyper TW, Fritze H, Wernars K, Smit E. Quantification of ectomycorrhizal mycelium in soil by real-time PCR compared to conventional quantification techniques. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003;45:283–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pilgard A, Alfredsen G, Bjordal CG, Fossdal CG, Borja I. qPCR as a tool to study basidiomycete colonization in wooden field stakes. Holzforschung. 2011;65:889–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Winton LM, Manter DK, Stone JK, Hansen EM. Comparison of biochemical, molecular, and visual methods to quantify Phaeocryptopus gaeumannii in Douglas-fir foliage. Phytopathology. 2003;93:121–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hietala AM, Eikenes M, Kvaalen H, Solheim H, Fossdal CG. Multiplex real-time PCR for monitoring Heterobasidion annosum colonization in Norway spruce clones that differ in disease resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:4413–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Flaherty JE, Dunkle LD. Identification and expression analysis of regulatory genes induced during conidiation in Exserohilum turcicum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2005;42:471–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Eikenes M, Hietala AM, Alfredsen G, Fossdal CG, Solheim H. Comparison of quantitative real-time PCR, chitin and ergosterol assays for monitoring colonization of Trametes versicolor in birch wood. Holzforschung. 2005;59:568–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Wallander H, Ekblad A, Godbold DL, Johnson D, Bahr A, Baldrian P, et al. Evaluation of methods to estimate production, biomass and turnover of ectomycorrhizal mycelium in forests soils - A review. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;57:1034–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Engler C, Gruetzner R, Kandzia R, Marillonnet S. Golden gate shuffling: a one-pot DNA shuffling method based on type IIs restriction enzymes. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5553.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Pöggeler S, Masloff S, Hoff B, Mayrhofer S, Kück U. Versatile EGFP reporter plasmids for cellular localization of recombinant gene products in filamentous fungi. Curr Genet. 2003;43:54–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Doehlemann G, van der Linde K, Assmann D, Schwammbach D, Hof A, Mohanty A, et al. Pep1, a secreted effector protein of Ustilago maydis, is required for successful invasion of plant cells. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000290.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Shibayama M, Kazuhiro O, Johnson R, Scott B, Itoh Y. Suppression of tandem-multimer formation during genetic transformation of the mycotoxin-producing fungus Penicillium paxilli by disrupting an orthologue of Aspergillus nidulans uvsC. Curr Genet. 2002;42:59–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Werner S, Sugui JA, Steinberg G, Deising HB. A chitin synthase with a myosin-like motor domain is essential for hyphal growth, appressorium differentiation, and pathogenicity of the maize anthracnose fungus Colletotrichum graminicola. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007;20:1555–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ye F, Albarouki E, Lingam B, Deising HB, von Wirén N. An adequate Fe nutritional status of maize suppresses infection and biotrophic growth of Colletotrichum graminicola. Physiol Plant. 2014;151:280–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Weihmann et al. 2016

Advertisement