Open Access

Characterization of two Lactococcus lactis zinc membrane proteins, Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526, and role of Llmg_0524 in cell wall integrity

  • Célia Roussel1, 2,
  • Bénédicte Cesselin1, 2,
  • Rémy Cachon3 and
  • Philippe Gaudu1, 2, 4Email author
BMC Microbiology201515:246

Received: 26 March 2015

Accepted: 23 October 2015

Published: 30 October 2015



Due to its extraordinary chemical properties, the cysteine amino acid residue is often involved in protein folding, electron driving, sensing stress, and binding metals such as iron or zinc. Lactococcus lactis, a Gram-positive bacterium, houses around one hundred cysteine-rich proteins (with the CX2C motif) in the cytoplasm, but only a few in the membrane.


In order to understand the role played by this motif we focused our work on two membrane proteins of unknown function: Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526. Each of these proteins has two CX2C motifs separated by ten amino-acid residues (CX2CX10CX2C). Together with a short intervening gene (llmg_0525), the genes of these two proteins form an operon, which is induced only during the early log growth phase. In both proteins, we found that the CX2CX10CX2C motif chelated a zinc ion via its cysteine residues, but the sphere of coordination was remarkably different in each case. In the case of Llmg_0524, two of the four cysteines were ligands of a zinc ion whereas in Llmg_0526, all four residues were involved in binding zinc. In both proteins, the cysteine-zinc complex was very stable at 37 °C or in the presence of oxidative agents, suggesting a probable role in protein stability. We found that the complete deletion of llmg_0524 increased the sensitivity of the mutant to cumene hydroperoxide whereas the deletion of the cysteine motif in Llmg_0524 resulted in a growth defect. The latter mutant was much more resistant to lysozyme than other strains.


Our data suggest that the CX2CX10CX2C motif is used to chelate a zinc ion but we cannot predict the number of cysteine residue involved as ligand of metal. Although no other motif is present in sequence to identify roles played by these proteins, our results indicate that Llmg_0524 contributes to the cell wall integrity.


Cysteine Zinc Membrane proteins Growth Cumene hydroperoxide Lysozyme


Cysteine is an extraordinary amino acid residue because of the chemical reactivity of its thiol group (SH). In contact with oxidative compounds, the thiol group can oxidize itself into sulfenic acids (SOH) or form a disulfide bond (R-S-S-R’) with another cysteine residue, either from the same or from a different protein. These oxidized states can revert back to the reduced form (R-SH) via the action of an electron donor [1, 2]. In contrast, autooxidation into sulfinic (SO2H) and sulfonic acid (SO3H) leads to irreversible states of cysteine. Besides cysteine also enables the sequestration of redox metals alone or in complex structure like iron-sulfur cluster that can modulate activity of the protein [3]. This amino acid can also bind non-redox metals such as zinc ion, for example in the zinc finger complex, thus enabling the correct folding of proteins. It is worth noting this latter complex is mainly found in eukaryotic cells [4]. Due to the redox properties of cysteine, the oxidation of this amino acid can activate transcriptional factors directly, as has been described in E. coli (OxyR, [5]) and Bacillus subtilis (OhrR, [6]), as well as indirectly, via the oxidation of a [Fe/S] cluster as described in SoxR and FNR in Escherichia coli. SoxR detects superoxide anions via oxidation of its [2S/2Fe] cluster, while FNR detects oxygen via oxidation-destruction of its [4S/4Fe] [3]. In addition, cysteine residues have also been associated with enzymatic activities, such as those involving glyceraldehyde dehydrogenase (Gapdh, a metabolic enzyme, [7]), heat shock chaperone proteins (Hsp33 [8], DnaJ [9]), and thioredoxins and glutaredoxins (electron carriers [2]). Thus, because of their involvement in multiple key aspects of cellular metabolism, cysteine residues in proteins should be widely distributed across all organisms, from viruses to complex forms like the eukaryotic cells.

Unexpectedly, recent studies on extracytoplasmic proteins whose activation is mediated by intramolecular disulfide bonds revealed that proteins in Gram-positive bacteria are proportionately poorer in cysteine residues than proteins found in other bacteria, a phenomenon termed “cysteine exclusion” [10, 11]. One proposed explanation was that, unlike Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria have neither a periplasmic space nor outer membrane. Thus, exported cysteine-rich proteins would be subject to oxidation, which, in the absence of repair machinery such as the DsB system in E. coli [1], would lead to their inactivation. In Gram-positive bacteria, some systems have been described: BdB system in B. subtilis [12] and more recently in Mycobacterium tuberculosis [13, 14] and in Streptococcus gordonii [15].

Compared to E. coli or B. subtilis, in Lactococcus lactis, a facultative aerobic bacterium of high technological interest, such system of repair has not yet been reported although this organism is widely used to overproduce recombinant proteins like cytokine IL-12 containing disulfide bridge for its activity [16]. Unexpectedly, this organism has an even lower amount of cysteine residue in its proteins [10, 11, 17]. Thus far, investigations of the proteins of this bacterium have characterized only a few whose cysteine residues interact with an iron-sulfur cluster or catalyze reduction of substrates, and all of these are cytosolic proteins. In the activase protein (NrdG) of the anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase complex (RNR), these residues are predicted to sequestrate a [4Fe/4S] cluster [18] and only three cysteines might be engaged to complex it as reported in E. coli NrdG [19]. In the dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (PyrK), four cysteines sequester a [2Fe/2S] redox cluster [20]. Both RNR and PyrK are connected to DNA synthesis. In the alkylhydroperoxide reductase (AhpC/AhpF) [21] and thioredoxin reductase/thioredoxin system (TR/Trx) [7], cysteines directly catalyze the reduction of substrates. AhpC/AhpF is one of the few enzymes described so far that play a role in oxidative stress resistance. TR/Trx maintains the intracellular redox state to protect intracellular proteins (like Gapdh) against oxidation [7, 22]. Finally, Clp ATPase (ClpE) was reported to contribute to the degradation of misfolded or truncated intracellular proteins [23], and its activity could depend on a putative cysteine-containing zinc finger [24].

In this work, we aimed to understand role of cysteines in L. lactis proteins and role of these proteins when cells are exposed to stressful conditions. Using a bioinformatic approach, we selected cysteine-rich proteins located in the membrane as they might constitute a first signaling pathway to detect environmental stress, or a defense line, through cysteine oxidation. Among a few proteins found in L. lactis strain MG1363, we focused on Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526, of which respective genes form an operon including also a small gene, llmg_0525. This operon was transiently induced at very early log growth phase. In the proteins, cysteine residues are organized in a CX2CX10CX2C motif involved in zinc coordination. Finally, through different constructions in Llmg_0524 we found that this protein had a severe impact on growth, affected resistance to cumene hydroperoxide and lysozyme suggesting this protein is linked to cell envelope integrity.


In silico analysis of the cysteine-rich membrane proteins

To identify the predicted membrane proteins that contained the CX2C motif in L. lactis strain MG1363, we used a bioinformatic approach. From the genome database we found that proteins harboring the potential redox CX2C motif represented only 4.88 % of total proteins (122 out of 2,434 proteins) (see in silico analysis section of Methods). This score is the lowest when we compared it to 6.39 % found in B. subtilis (strain 168, 267 out of 4,175 proteins) or 10.04 % in E. coli (strain K-12 subsp MG1655, 416 out of 4,141 proteins). These data are in agreement with the theory of “cysteine exclusion” and is also strengthened by the capacity of L. lactis strain to grow in presence of large amount of reducing agents like dithiothreitol (DTT) [10, 25].

When we used the prediction program (TMHMM server) to extract only membrane proteins, this number dropped to seven against 42 found in B. subtlilis or 94 in E. coli. Three of these proteins had a predicted function, whereas the remaining four did not (Table 1). Llmg_0199 (FeoB) and Llmg_1729 (CopA) have been linked to metal (iron and copper, respectively) homeostasis in bacteria [2628]. The former protein is particularly likely to serve an essential function, as iron is necessary in L. lactis not only for DNA synthesis (with RNR and PyrK) but also for heme synthesis from protoporphyrinogen IX [29]. Heme enables L. lactis to undergo respiration, and this growth condition (aerated medium supplemented with heme) translates into increased biomass yield and an increase in long-term survival versus fermentation [29, 30]. Llmg_2304 (ComC) contained six cysteines, including two CX2C motifs separated by 21 amino acid residues. This protein is similar to PilD (23 % of identity, mainly in the N-terminal extremity), a peptidase involved in pili synthesis. In Pseudomonas species, the cysteine residues of PilD should complex a zinc ion. However, studies revealed that the cysteine-zinc complex may be unstable in vitro as, in some protein preparations, a disulfide bond was formed instead [31, 32]. Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526 each contained four cysteines, in a CX2CX10CX2C motif in the N-terminal extremity (Nter) (Additional file 1: Figure S1), while Llmg_1066 harbored a CX2C motif in its C-terminal extremity (Cter). Llmg_1102 contained four target motifs in its Nter domain, which were organized into two CX2CX14CX2C motifs. With the exception of the cysteine motif, no other signatures were detected that predicted the function of the latter four proteins.
Table 1

Putative membrane proteins containing CX2C motif in L. lactis strain MG1363



N. of cysteine

N. of CX2C motif

Llmg_0199, FeoB




Llmg_1729, CopA




Llmg_2304, ComC




















TMD, transmembrane domain (TMHMM prediction program, cut off >0.4)

To understand the role of the cysteine motif in L. lactis proteins, we continued our investigation by focusing on two cysteine-rich proteins, Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526, which might sense stressful environments via cysteine oxidation and their putative membrane localization. We aimed to determine: i) the genetic organization and expression of these proteins; ii) the localization and properties of the cysteine motif within the proteins; and iii) the role of these proteins.

Temporal expression of the llmg_0524-0525-0526 operon

We found a stem loop upstream of the llmg_0524 ORF (−15.3 Kcals) and another one downstream of the llmg_0526 ORF (−15.2 Kcals), suggesting a potential operonic structure for the three genes: the llmg_0524 ORF; the llmg_0525 ORF, which encodes a small (64 amino-acid residues) hydrophobic protein free of cysteines; and the llmg_0526 ORF (Fig. 1a). To test our hypothesis, we performed RT-PCR assays with different primer pairs and total RNA that had been extracted from cells harvested in the exponential growth phase (Fig. 1b). The results showed that an mRNA transcript overlapped two adjacent genes (llmg_0524-0525 and llmg_0525-0526). The PCR product had the same size of that obtained from genomic DNA (positive control) and was absent when RNA preparation was pretreated with a RNase (negative control). We also performed PCR with primers designed inside the llmg_0524 and llmg_0526 ORFs; the transcripts of this PCR product covered all three genes. No PCR amplification was obtained with primer pairs designed for the llmg_0526 and llmg_0527 ORFs (or for glpT and llmg_0524), a result that was consistent with the presence of stem loops (data not shown). Finally, we cloned a DNA fragment that covered the region from the middle of the llmg_0524 ORF to the beginning of the llmg_0526 ORF (start codon included); this fragment was inserted upstream of the promoterless lacZ gene of the pTCV-lac plasmid [33], generating plasmid P0526-pTCV-lac. After we introduced this plasmid into L. lactis strain MG1363, we did not detect any β-galactosidase (β-Gal) activity under the tested conditions (static, aeration, and peroxide stress growth conditions), suggesting the absence of a promoter, specifically the one upstream of the llmg_0524 ORF. Taken together, these results indicate that the three genes are clustered in an operon and under the control of a promoter located upstream of the llmg_0524 ORF.
Fig. 1

llmg_0524, llmg_0525, and llmg_0526 form an operon. a Schematic representation of the locus; bp - base pair. b RT-PCR analysis of the locus. Total RNA was translated into cDNA, which in turn was used as the template for PCR with different primer pairs (a, b, c, and d). Pos Control, positive control with genomic DNA as a template; Neg Control, negative control with treatment of RNA preparation with a RNase

To study the expression of the operon, we cloned the promoter region of llmg_0524 ORF into the pTCV-lac plasmid, creating plasmid P0524-pTCV-lac, and introduced this into L. lactis strain MG1363. With ortho-nitrophenyl galactoside as the growth substrate and glucose as the energy source, we did not detect any β-Gal activity. However, using a more sensitive test with a fluorescent substrate (β-Glo), we managed to detect some β-Gal activity, indicating that the operon was poorly expressed. Under these conditions, we observed β-Gal induction an hour after inoculation (Fig. 2a), with a peak around OD600 0.1. Beyond this point, β-Gal activity decreased progressively with further growth. When glucose was replaced by galactose as the energy source, β-Gal expression increased but appeared later (OD600 0.25) in growth than was observed with glucose. Moreover, instead of having a peak, transcript quantity reached a stable plateau with minor changes until OD600 0.5 and then it went down. To validate gene expression we performed semi-quantitative RT-PCR assays (Fig. 2b), which revealed relative transcript amounts that were concordant with the β-Gal activity patterns. None of the other tested growth conditions (anaerobic, aeration, and oxidative stress; data not shown) resulted in changes to the expression of the operon. In addition, deletion of llmg_0524 or llmg_0526 (see below) decreased two-fold expression of the operon (Additional file 2: Figure S2). We thus conclude that operon is transiently transcribed and occurs only during the early log growth phase.
Fig. 2

Temporal expression of the operon. a Expression kinetics of the operon. Cells were grown in M17glucose (black squares) or M17galactose (white squares). At regular intervals, aliquots were collected to assess β-gal activity. Values, plus standard deviations, are the means of three independent experiments. b Semi-quantification of the llmg_0524 transcript. Cells were grown on glucose (top) or on galactose (bottom) and collected at certain growth phases. Total RNA was prepared for semi-quantitative RT-PCR determination. Control - ahpC. Dil. - dilution

Membrane localization of Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526

Analyses of these proteins with topology prediction programs suggested that Llmg_0524 contained two transmembrane domains (Additional file 1: Figure S1) but the programs yielded no information about the localization of the Nter domain (inside or outside). Llmg_0526 contained a transmembrane domain with the Nter region, indicating that this end is probably inside the cell. To obtain direct experimental evidence regarding the membrane topology of these proteins, we performed an alkaline phosphatase (PhoA) assay [34]. PhoA is activated via the oxidation of its cysteine residue to form a disulfide bridge, a reaction which occurs mainly in the periplasm of E. coli cells. The PhoA assay thus consists of fusing the signal-sequence-less phoA gene to a target DNA sequence and then monitoring for PhoA activity; such activity should only be detectable if the target DNA addresses the resulting protein into the periplasmic space. We therefore constructed a set of plasmids that each contained a different portion of the llmg_0524 and the llmg_0526 ORFs fused to phoA (Fig. 3a), and then established the plasmids in the E. coli phoA mutant. Bacteria were grown on LB agar supplemented with arabinose for the production of fusion proteins and with a BCIP compound for the detection of PhoA activity. Cells that produced the PhoA2 hybrid proteins (containing the transmembrane domain) generated a strong blue color corresponding to the degradation of BCIP, while those that produced the PhoA1 constructs (lacking the transmembrane domain) displayed only weak coloration indicating that PhoA was addressed out of cytosol with phoA2 construction (Fig. 3b). Quantification of the PhoA activity confirmed these observations, revealing the strongest activity in cells with the PhoA2 fusions (Additional file 3: Figure S3). We therefore conclude the two proteins are located in the membrane, with the Nter ends located in the cytoplasm.
Fig. 3

Nter end of Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526 is intracellular. a Schematic representation of the proteins with position of transmembrane domain (TMD) and protein fusion with PhoA. b Phosphatase activity of cells that overproduced the protein fusions. Fusion proteins were overproduced in a E. coli phoA mutant, which were then treated with arabinose. Phosphatase activity was revealed in presence of BCIP compound present in agar plates

Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526 are zinc metalloproteins

As the CX2CX10CX2C motif in Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526 was identical to that of the zinc metalloprotein DnaJ [9, 35], we hypothesized that our target proteins also bound a metal. To test this, we purified the Nter domain of Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526 (51 amino-acid residues) as a hybrid protein to the maltose binding protein MalE, creating MalE-0524Nter and MalE-0526Nter, respectively. The protein MalE-lacZα corresponding to the plasmid without insert (pmal-c4x) was used as a control. After purification, the hybrid proteins were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine nature of metal ion if present in protein (Table 2). We found magnesium ion was present in all preparation at relative similar concentration but this ion has not been reported to bind with cysteine residues. MalE-lacZα did not contain iron or zinc metal in significant amount in contrast to other proteins. In the presence of MalE-0524Nter, zinc was far more abundant than iron. In preparations of MalE-0526Nter, although zinc was still the most abundant, there was also a quantity of iron ion. However, this protein (as well as MalE-0524Nter) was colorless (Additional file 4: Figure S4) and its UV-visible spectrum did not display any absorption bands in visible wavelengths, which are characteristic of iron-cysteine proteins [36]. Furthermore, when the medium was supplemented with zinc salt, the level of iron in the preparation decreased dramatically, indicating that the affinity of MalE-0526Nter to iron was not specific. Altogether these results indicate that Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526 are zinc metalloproteins.
Table 2

Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526 are zinc metalloproteins


Ratio [Metal]/[protein]

Ratio [Zinc(PAR)2]/[protein]







0.21 ± 0.05

0.07 ± 0.01

0.45 ± 0.02

0.5 ± 0.07

MalE-0526 Nter

0.26 ± 0.02

0.54 ± 0.05

0.79 ± 0.05

0.8 ± 0.10


0.58 ± 0.1


0.04 ± 0.01


+ zinc


MalE-0524 Nter

0.20 ± 0.07

0.02 ± 0.01

0.42 ± 0.08

0.4 ± 0.03

MalE-0526 Nter

0.30 ± 0.11

0.03 ± 0.01

0.65 ± 0.14

0.8 ± 0.05


0.17 ± 0.04


0.01 ± 0.01


All Buffers were treated with Chelex. Values are the mean of three independent protein purifications. + zinc, cultures were supplemented with 0.1 mM of zinc salt. MalE-lacZα (from plasmid, pMal c4x) is used as a control, ND: not determined

The CX2CX10CX2C motif binds zinc metal directly

The ICP-MS analysis allowed us to determine the stoichiometry ratio of zinc to protein: 0.45:1 for MalE-0524Nter and 0.7:1 for MalE-0526Nter (Table 2). These ratios did not change when we supplemented the media with zinc salt indicating the LB broth contained enough metals to load synthesized proteins. These ratios were further confirmed by the titration of zinc ions with the chelator PAR, (4-(2-pyridylazo) resorcinol (Table 2). To demonstrate that this metal was coordinated in the proteins via the thiol group of the cysteine, we treated the proteins with p-hydroxy mercury-phenylsulfonate agent (PMPS). PMPS specifically disrupts the cysteine-zinc bond by forming a cysteine-mercury and the released zinc ion can be titrated with PAR [37]. Evidence of zinc-PAR2 complex formation appeared progressively with increasing amounts of PMPS in the mixture (Fig. 4). For MalE-0524Nter, two equivalents of PMPS versus protein were required to release around 90 % of the zinc ions, and adding more PMPS (or zinc in the medium) did not significantly change the absorbance. As there were no cysteines in the MalE portion of the fusion protein, this result meant that two cysteine residues of Llmg_0524Nter were involved in binding the zinc metal. If this were the case, the protein should therefore also contain free thiols, which we determined via titration with 5,5-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), a compound which reacts to free thiol groups [38]. We observed that the ratio of free cysteine:protein was close to one (Table 3). The second residue was not titrated in our assays probably because it was not accessible to DTNB due for instance to folding of Llmg_0524 fragment. In MalE-0526Nter, instead, four equivalents of PMPS were required to release most of the zinc from the protein, indicating a stoichiometry of 4:1 of PMPS:zinc and thus the presence of a zinc(Cys)4 complex. In agreement with these observations, titration with DTNB indicated a low amount of free thiol groups in our preparations (Table 3). We thus conclude that each of the two proteins harbors a zinc-cysteine module but in different coordination spheres: zinc(Cys)2(X)2 (X - unknown ligand) in Llmg_0524 and zinc(Cys)4 in Llmg_0526.
Fig. 4

Presence of a cysteine-zinc module in proteins. The cysteine-zinc bond was characterized by PMPS-PAR assays with 20 μM of proteins. MalE-0524Nter (left) or MalE-0526Nter (right) were purified from cultures (ctl; grey squares) and from those that were supplemented with zinc salt (black circles) Values, plus standard deviations, are the means of three independent experiments

Table 3

Determination of free thiol groups in protein fusions



MalE-524Nter, zinc


MalE-526Nter, zinc

Thiol (μM)

17 ± 3

17 ± 2

8 ± 1

5 ± 0.5


0.85 ± 0.15

0.85 ± 0.1

0.4 ± 0.05

0.25 ± 0.02

20 μM of protein (equivalent to 80 μM of free thiol groups) was used for thiol group determination by DTNB assays

In addition, we tested the stability of the zinc module in the presence of oxidative agents (hydrogen peroxide, cumene hydroperoxide) and a temperature of 37 °C, which affects protein folding in L. lactis. In the presence of ten equivalents of oxidant or 37 °C, no released zinc ions were detected by PAR (data not shown), indicating that the modules in these proteins are very stable in tested conditions.

Llmg_0524 is required for resistance against cumene hydroperoxide and cell wall integrity

To investigate the function of the llmg_0524-0525-0526 operon in vivo, an in frame-markerless deletion of the llmg_0524 or llmg_0526 gene was constructed in the chromosome of strain MG1363. As our in silico analyses did not yield any information about the potential functions of these proteins, we screened the mutants in several growth conditions. From these we found no clear phenotypic changes in the ∆llmg_0526 mutant compared to its isogenic wild-type (wt) strain (data not shown). In the ∆llmg_0524 mutant, instead, we found one growth condition in which the ∆llmg_0524 mutant was more sensitive than the wt strain: growth in the presence of cumene hydroperoxide (CHP), an oxidative agent [39], and with galactose as an energy source (Fig. 5). In contrast, we did not observe any difference between the two strains treated hydrogen peroxide (data not shown). Resistance to CHP was completely restored when we transformed the ∆llmg_0524 mutant with a plasmid expressing the wt operon (pllmg_0524 C ). Interestingly, the plasmid pllmg_0524 c,cyst , which carried a version of the operon in which the DNA region encoding the cysteine motif of Llmg_0524 had been deleted, was unable to complement the mutant (Fig. 6). In fact, the mutant producing the truncated Llmg_0524 grew very poorly even in the absence of stress, and on glucose as energy sources as well (Fig. 6a). Then, we asked whether the modifications of lipid or cell wall synthesis were responsible of that growth defect. Addition of Tween-80, a donor of long chain fatty acids, did not have any effect on the growth. In contrast, we found that the mutant, carrying the plasmid pllmg_0524 c,cyst , became more resistant to lysozyme, an hydrolase of peptidoglycan, than the other strains (Fig. 6b) indicating that the growth defect was due to cell wall modifications. We conclude the Llmg_0524 is linked to cell wall integrity and resistance to stressful conditions.
Fig. 5

Role of Llmg_0524 mutant in cumene hydroperoxide resistance and growth. Cells were grown in M17galactose in static conditions at 30 °C. When cell density reached OD600 0.1, 0.3 mM of cumene hydroperoxide (CHP) was added to the culture. WT - black line, ∆llmg_0524 mutant - gray line, ∆llmg_0524 mutant carrying the plasmid encoding the full operon (pllmg_0524 C) - gray dashed line. Values, plus standard deviations, are the means of three independent experiments

Fig. 6

Role of Llmg_0524 in the cell wall integrity. a Effect on the growth of the deletion of the cysteine-rich motif in Llmg_0524. Cells were grown in M17glucose in static conditions at 30 °C. The ∆llmg_0524 mutant carrying the plasmid pllmg_0524 c,cyst is represented by a dark gray dashed line. The plasmid encoded the full operon, but lacked the region in the llmg_0524 ORF corresponding to the cysteine motif. Values, plus standard deviations, are the means of three independent experiments (same results were obtained with galactose as an energy source). b Effect of lysozyme resistance of the deletion of the cysteine-rich motif in Llmg_0524. After overnight cultures, strains were washed in PBS buffer and recovered at the same OD600. After 60 min of incubation in absence (white bars) or in presence of lysozyme (black bars), SDS was added at 0.1 % final concentration and measured OD600. Values, plus standard deviation, are the means of three independent experiments. They are expressed in percent of OD600 measured in samples incubated 60 min in absence of lysozyme and SDS


In this study we characterized Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526, two proteins of unknown functions with the same CX2CX10CX2C motif. This motif bound a zinc ion. We found that the cysteine-zinc complex was stable when subjected to stress, suggesting it plays a role in protein stability rather than as a sensor. This hypothesis is supported by our observation that deletion of this motif in Llmg_0524 had serious impacts on cell growth. In addition, we did find that Llmg_0524 also increased resistance against the oxidative agent cumene hydroperoxide.

A cysteine motif to chelate metal

In L. lactis strain, we demonstrated that the CX2CX10CX2C motif bound zinc ion. This by itself is not novel, as this motif is also found in other proteins (Additional file 5: Table S2), and in some of these, it has been experimentally demonstrated to bind this metal. For example, the DnaJ protein of E. coli binds zinc ion using all four cysteines of the motif, and formation of the zinc-cysteine complex is required for protein activation [9, 35]. More recently, the same motif was found in E. coli YciM, a membrane protein, in which the four cysteine residues were involved in metal coordination. However, YciM is proposed to bind iron ion instead of zinc [36]. From these observations alone, it was clear from this study and others (YciM, DnaJ) that the motif is used for trapping metal, but the question remained: is it possible to predict which metal, and the individual cysteine residues’ contributions to sphere coordination, based only on the motif? In this study and DnaJ, zinc ion is the major metal found suggesting that this motif may have a bigger affinity to this metal than iron. In L. lactis, this motif may contain zinc since in strain MG1363 level of zinc ion is 25-fold higher than that of iron whereas in E. coli strain zinc is present in an amount similar as iron [40, 41]. However, there are few examples describing the complex cysteine-metal to make this hypothesis true to proteins having this motif in other bacteria. With the MalE-0526Nter fusion protein, PMPS-PAR assays demonstrated the presence of a zinc(Cys)4 module in Llmg_0526, clearly indicating that all cysteine residues were engaged in zinc coordination. Unexpectedly, however, similar tests using the fusion MalE-0524Nter revealed that only two residues bound zinc. The two other cysteines of the protein were free, although we detected only one residue. That observation also indicated that MalE-0524Nter lacked a disulfide bond, suggesting that the fusion protein was not redox reactive in vitro. However, in vivo these two free cysteine residues could play a role in the intact protein by forming intra- or intermolecular disulfide bridge between two Llmg_0524 or Llmg_0524 and another protein. To our knowledge, zinc usually binds four ligands, with cysteine and histidine residues as the most common ligands by far [4]. However, no histidine is present in the cytoplasmic portion of Llmg_0524, which suggests that the metal coordination of this protein is unusual. Additional experiments will be needed to determine the other ligands of zinc ion in Llmg_0524, as well as the parameters that could govern the specificity of metal.

Role of the llmg_0524-0525-0526 operon

Unlike cysteine, zinc is not redox reactive in proteins. As the bound modules in Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526 were very stable in the presence of oxidative agents or 37 °C, which affects the protein folding in L. lactis, it is unlikely that the module is used as a direct sensor of stress, as has been described, e.g., for the chaperone Hps33 [8]. Instead, for Llmg_0524 at least, we think that the Zn module serves to stabilize the folded structure of the protein as required for its function, perhaps for interaction with other proteins. This hypothesis is supported by the dramatic growth differences we observed between the wild-type and the truncated-Llmg_0524 mutant strain, which lacked the cysteine motif (Fig. 6). Even in the absence of stress, this strain displayed a severe growth defect. Similarly, in E. coli, YciM mutants lacking this motif were unstable and formed aggregates [36]. In addition, our experiments with deletion mutants suggest that this operon plays a role in cell wall integrity in particular with peptidoglycan synthesis since that mutant, producing the truncated LLmg_0524, was more resistant to lysozyme than other strains. A modification of cell wall may explain the light resistance to cumene hydroperoxide observed in the ∆llmg_0524 mutant. Studies are in progress to characterize the modification of cell wall linked to ∆llmg_0524 deletion. Our experiments with the ∆llmg_0526 mutant did not produce any reproducible phenotypes even against the cumene hydroperoxide toxicity. In a protein BLAST search, this protein displays similarity to S. aureus TcaA, which has a cysteine motif inside, which might bind metal although this has not been confirmed [42]. Downstream of the motif, we found a transmembrane domain followed by a long extracellular chain [42]. In S. aureus, TcaA is induced by envelope stress and resistant to teicoplanin, an antibiotic of glycopeptide family [42]. Although they share a similar primary structure, Llmg_0526 does probably not play the same role of TcaA. In contrast to tcaA, L. lactis, llmg_0524-0525-0526 operon is not induced by the envelope stress response [43].


Cysteine motifs in proteins are often associated to redox activity (like thioredoxin) or iron-sulfur cluster (like [4Fe/4S]) in bacteria, but less is known about cysteine motif in chelating zinc ion. In this work, we characterized in Lactococcus lactis, two membrane proteins (Llmg_0524 and Llmg_0526) carrying a CX2CX10CX2C motif. The motif bound zinc ion although the sphere of coordination of zinc was remarkably different between the two proteins. Our works suggest that Llmg_0524, and maybe other proteins of operon, is linked to cell wall integrity. The function of this protein in the machinery of cell wall synthesis remains to uncover now, as well as its zinc module.



All authors declared that no animal and human have been used in this study.

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Additional file 6: Table S1. For routine growth, L. lactis strains were grown in M17 (Oxoïd) medium that was supplemented with 0.5 % glucose, at 30 °C without shaking. The E. coli strain, used as a cloning host, was grown aerobically in Luria-Bertani medium (LB), at 37 °C with shaking. Antibiotics were used when needed at the following concentrations: 100 μg/ml of ampicillin or 40 μg/ml of kanamycin for E. coli strains, 5 μg/ml of tetracycline or 0.1 μg/ml of erythromycin for L. lactis strains. The growth of L. lactis strains was evaluated as follows: i) Wild-type and mutant strains were grown in M17 media that was supplemented with sugars (galactose, glucose) from an initial cell density (OD600) of 0.025. When cultures reached 0.1 of OD600, the following compounds were added at 0.3 mM: cumene hydroperoxide or hydrogen peroxide. Growth was measured for 24 h by assessing optical densities in an Infinite M200 (Tecan) spectrophotometer.

In silico analysis

L. lactis proteins that contained the CX2C motif were identified and downloaded from a genome database (Genolist server, [44]) and further analyzed with the prediction program TMHMM (Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, [45]) to identify membrane domains. Proteins with a probability of transmembrane domain less than 0.4 were filtered out.

Plasmid and mutant constructions

Standard DNA recombination procedures were used, as described in Sambrook and Russell [46]. PCR amplifications were carried out using Taq Phusion DNA polymerase (Finnzymes). Amplified fragments were purified with the Purelink™ Quick PCR Purification kit or Quick Gel Extraction kit (Invitrogen). Plasmid extraction was performed with the QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit (Qiagen). Deletion mutants were constructed using the double-crossing-over method as described in Biswas et al. [47]. Using specific primers (Additional file 6: Table S1), the DNA fragments located upstream and downstream, respectively, of the target genes were amplified. These fragments were then fused in a second PCR and the DNA product was ligated into the EcoRI and XbaI sites of plasmid pBR322p + Ghost8. The insert was checked by sequencing. The modified plasmids were first established into E. coli strain TG1 by electroporation [48] and further into L. lactis strains [49]. Transformants were selected on M17 glucose that was supplemented with tetracycline at 30 °C. After integration of the plasmid into the locus at 37 °C, it was excised at 30 °C. The deletion of llmg_0524 and llmg_0526 in ten clones was checked by PCRs with oligos outside (upstream and downstream) of the recombination sites. For the complementation tests, the full operon, including a 500-bp open reading frame (ORF) upstream of llmg_0524, was amplified by PCR with primer pair 524-526-cplR and 524-526-cplF and cloned in the HindIII and SalI sites of pAK80 [50]. The resulting plasmid, pllmg_0524 C , was then established in the ∆llmg_0524 mutant with erythromycin as selection. A similar construct, in which only the cysteine region of llmg_0524 was omitted, was created and designated pllmg_0524 C,cyst .

RT-PCR and gene expression analysis


Total RNA was extracted from 50 ml of culture of L. lactis strain MG1363 at the early exponential phase (OD600 0.1-0.2) using the Trizol reagent method (Invitrogen). The RNA preparation was treated with DNAse I (Fermentas) to eliminate DNA contamination (this was confirmed by the absence of PCR product following a PCR with the ahpC gene as the target). DNA-free RNA was translated into cDNA by the iScript™ cDNA synthesis kit (Biorad). To analyze whether llmg_0524 and llmg_0526 genes are transcribed in an operon, 4 μl cDNA was used for amplification by PCR with primers listed in Additional file 6: Table S1. Semi-quantitive RT-PCR. 4 μl of cDNA, pure or diluted, was used in a PCR analysis containing primers that were designed to amplify the internal region of llmg_0524 (300 bp) and a control gene ahpC (419 bp) (Additional file 6: Table S1).

Gene expression

To analyze llmg_0524 and llmg_0526 gene expression, we constructed transcriptional fusions between the plasmid pTCV-lac [33], carrying the lacZ reporter gene, and the putative promoter region of each gene. The specific primers used for amplifying each promoter region (249 bp upstream of llmg_0524 and 162 bp upstream of llmg_0526) are listed in Additional file 6: Table S1. After digestion with XmaI and EcoRI restriction enzymes, each PCR product was cloned into pTCV-lac, resulting in the creation of plasmids P0524-pTCV-lac and P0526-pTCV-lac. The ligation products were established into E. coli strain TG1, at which point the insertions were confirmed by PCR and sequencing using the specific oligonucleotides Vlac1 and Vlac2. The two plasmids were established into L. lactis strain MG1363 and transformants were selected on plates supplemented with erythromycin.

Enzymatic assays

β-galactosidase fusion assays

Cells that contained plasmids P0524-pTCV-lac or P0526-pTCV-lac were grown in M17 medium supplemented with glucose or galactose. β-Galactosidase activity was quantified by luminescence in an Infinite M200 spectroluminometer (Tecan) using the β-Glo® assay system (Promega), as recommended by the manufacturer. Values were normalized to those obtained from L. lactis strain MG1363 carrying the plasmid pTCV-lac. On glucose we had time (h) after inoculation-OD600: 0–0.025; 1–0.075; 1.5-0.15; 2–0.2; 2.5-0.4; 3.5-0.55; 4.5-1.5; 7–2; on galactose, 1.5-0.16; 2-.2; 2.5-0.35; 4.5-.54; 7-.8; 8–1.15; 8.5-1.4. Alkaline Phosphatase (PhoA) assay. To determine the orientation of proteins, we identified the DNA regions that corresponded to the N-terminal extremity (Nter) of proteins with or without the transmembrane domain and cloned them into the XhoI and KpnI sites of the plasmid pHA-Zed [34]. This plasmid contained the phoA gene, which encodes an alkaline phosphatase enzyme under the control of an arabinose-dependent promoter region. The plasmids thus obtained were designated p524PhoA1 and p526PhoA1 (containing the Nter of llmg_0524 or llmg_0526, respectively, without the membrane domain and with phoA), and p524PhoA2 and p526PhoA2 (same as PhoA1 plasmids but with the membrane domain). The plasmids were established into E. coli strain CC118 [34] and recombinant clones were selected with ampicillin. To measure PhoA activity in E. coli strains, overnight cultures were diluted in LB broth to OD600 0.05 and grown until they reached OD600 0.5, at which point the cultures were treated for 2 h with 0.2 % arabinose. A 100 μl aliquot was taken from each culture, washed twice, and incubated with 0.8 ml of Tris HCl buffer pH 8 (1 M) and 100 μl ρ-nitrophenyl phosphate (4 g/l) at 37 °C. When a yellow color appeared, we stopped the reactions by adding 200 μl K2HPO4 (1 M). Substrate hydrolysis was measured at OD405 and values are expressed in Miller units using the following formula: [OD405-(1.75xOD405)] x 1000/[incubation time (min) x OD600 x 0.1]. PhoA activity was visually analyzed on plates that contained LB agar supplemented with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP). The clones producing extracytoplasmic PhoA displayed a blue color due to the hydrolysis of BCIP in 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indole (BCI) and inorganic phosphate under aerobic growth conditions.

Overproduction and purification of MalE-Nter fusions

For purification of the N-terminal region (Nter) of proteins (the first 51 amino acid residues), we used the pMal™ Protein Fusion and Purification System (Biolabs). The llmg_0524’ fragment was amplified by PCR and cloned into the pMal-c4x vector and the product established into E. coli strain TG1. A transformant containing the plasmid pMal-0524Nter was cultured in SOC medium supplemented or not with zinc chloride 0.1 mM. When OD600 was close to 0.5 we added IPTG (isopropyl 1-thiol-β-D-galactopyranoside, 0.5 mM). After 4 h of incubation, cells were collected and washed twice in 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5 buffer, pretreated with Chelex resin (Sigma), and stored as a cell pellet at −80 °C. We purified MalE-0524Nter by affinity chromatography according to manufacter’s procedure (Biolabs) [51] with Chelex-treated buffers. The same strategy was used to produce the fusion MalE-0526Nter. Protein purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE and proteins were concentrated in spin columns (Centricon, Amicon, cut off: 10 KDa). Protein concentrations were determined with the Bradford assay method (Biorad) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.

Zinc relative abundance determination

Zinc Quantification

Proteins (40 μM) were precipitated during 30 min in ice with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) at 10 %. After centrifugation (15 min, 15,000 g), the supernatant was first neutralized with NaOH and then Tris–HCl pH 7.5 was added to 0.5 M final concentration. Samples of 400 μl each were incubated for 1 h in a solution of 4-(2-pyridylazo) resorcinol (PAR) at 200 μM final concentration in a total volume of 1 ml. The formation of the Zn(PAR)2 complex was determined at OD495495 = 66 M−1. cm−1). PMPS-PAR assays. ρ-hydroxymercuriphenylsulfonic acid (PMPS) was used to determine if ligands formed between zinc and MalE-0524Nter or MalE-0526Nter. Proteins were first treated with PMPS at different concentrations and a colorimetric PAR assay was used to determine the amount of zinc ion released into solution.

Stability of cysteine/zinc complex

The stability of the complex was tested by treating proteins at 37 °C or in the presence of 10 equivalents of hydrogen peroxide or cumene hydroperoxyde at 30 °C. After 1 h incubation, the amount of zinc ion released into solution was determined by the colorimetric PAR assay.

Free accessible thiol groups titration

Accessible thiol groups were measured using Ellman’s method [38]. Proteins (20 μM) were incubated with 60 μM of 5,5-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) in 0.1 M Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8), at room temperature in the dark. After 30 min, the OD412 was determined. The concentration of accessible thiol groups was estimated using a standard curve of N-acetyl-L-cysteine (5–60 μM).

ICP-MS analysis

Metal ions (Mg, Cu, Fe, Co, Mn, Zn) were identified and quantified by inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Agilent 7700x) at the Geosciences-Montpellier facility (Université Montpellier II). Cu, Co, and Mn ions were not detected in our preparations. Values were obtained in μM of metal ion and expressed in the ratio [metal ion]/[protein].

Stress assays

Cells were cultured in M17 Glu0.5 % until saturation. Cell suspensions were diluted 100 fold in agar 0.6 % and loaded on solid M17Glu0.5 % agar plates (or M17Gal0.5 %). A disc papers soaped with compounds (30 μl of solution or 5 μl of solution) were put down on soft agar. Plates were incubated at 30 °C. Compounds tested were: NaCl 5 M, HCl 5 N, NaOH 5 N, Bacitracin 50 mg/ml, Rifampicin 50 mg/ml, DTT 2 M, H2O2 5 M, Cumene hydroperoxide 5 M, lysozyme 0.05 up to 5 mg/ml, SDS 0.005 up to 5 %, EDTA 1 up to 25 mM, acid lactique 0.1 %, nisin 2.5 up to 25 units/ml, alone and in combination). For test at 37 °C, we incubated plates at this temperature for overnight. When we observed a difference between mutant and wild-type, tests were repeated in liquid.

Lysozyme assays

Strains were grown in M17Glu0.5 % for overnight. Cells were washed once in PBS buffer and recovered in the buffer for OD600 determination. After OD600 adjustments, strains were treated or not with lysozyme (1 mg/ml) for 60 min at 30 °C. Then, a solution of sodium dodecyl-sulfate (SDS) was added at 0.1 % final concentration to clear the cell suspension and measured the OD600.



Wild type


Cumene hydroperoxide


4-(2-pyridylazo) resorcinol




5,5-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid)


ρ-hydroxymercuriphenylsulfonic acid


Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry



We thank Chantal Douchet for ICP-MS analysis, G. von Heijne and D. Daley for plasmid pHA-1::yedZ and E. coli strain CC118; and the MicrobAdapt team, David Pérez-Pascual, and Lionel Rigottier-Gois for fruitful discussion. We thank L. Higgins for English corrections. This work is funded by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche Food Redox project (ANR-11-ALID-0001).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

INRA, UMR1319 Micalis
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis
UMR A 02.102 Unité Procédés Alimentaires et Microbiologiques, AgroSup Dijon-Université de Bourgogne
Institut Micalis UMR1319 et AgroParisTech, Domaine de Vilvert


  1. Kadokura H, Katzen F, Beckwith J. Protein disulfide bond formation in prokaryotes. Ann rev Biochem. 2003;72:111–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lu J, Holmgren A. The thioredoxin antioxidant system. Free Rad Biol Med. 2014;66:75–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kiley PJ, Beinert H. The role of Fe-S proteins in sensing and regulation in bacteria. Cur opin Microbiol. 2003;6(2):181–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreini C, Bertini I, Cavallaro G. Minimal functional sites allow a classification of zinc sites in proteins. PloSONE. 2011;6(10), e26325.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zheng M, Aslund F, Storz G. Activation of the OxyR transcription factor by reversible disulfide bond formation. Science. 1998;279(5357):1718–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Soonsanga S, Lee JW, Helmann JD. Oxidant-dependent switching between reversible and sacrificial oxidation pathways for Bacillus subtilis OhrR. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68(4):978–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Vido K, Diemer H, Van Dorsselaer A, Leize E, Juillard V, Gruss A, et al. Roles of thioredoxin reductase during the aerobic life of Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(2):601–10.Google Scholar
  8. Ilbert M, Horst J, Ahrens S, Winter J, Graf PC, Lilie H, et al. The redox-switch domain of Hsp33 functions as dual stress sensor. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007;14(6):556–63.Google Scholar
  9. Ishii Y, Sonezaki S, Iwasaki Y, Tauchi E, Shingu Y, Okita K, et al. Single-step purification and characterization of MBP (maltose binding protein)-DnaJ fusion protein and its utilization for structure-function analysis. J Biochem. 1998;124(4):842–7.Google Scholar
  10. Daniels R, Mellroth P, Bernsel A, Neiers F, Normark S, von Heijne G, et al. Disulfide bond formation and cysteine exclusion in gram-positive bacteria. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(5):3300–9.Google Scholar
  11. Dutton RJ, Boyd D, Berkmen M, Beckwith J. Bacterial species exhibit diversity in their mechanisms and capacity for protein disulfide bond formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(33):11933–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kouwen TR, van der Goot A, Dorenbos R, Winter T, Antelmann H, Plaisier MC, et al. Thiol-disulphide oxidoreductase modules in the low-GC Gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2007;64(4):984–99.Google Scholar
  13. Chim N, Harmston CA, Guzman DJ, Goulding CW. Structural and biochemical characterization of the essential DsbA-like disulfide bond forming protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. BMC struct Biol. 2013;13:23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang X, Dutton RJ, Beckwith J, Boyd D. Membrane topology and mutational analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis VKOR, a protein involved in disulfide bond formation and a homologue of human vitamin K epoxide reductase. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(8):1413–20.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Davey L, Ng CK, Halperin SA, Lee SF. Functional analysis of paralogous thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases in Streptococcus gordonii. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(23):16416–29.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bermudez-Humaran LG, Langella P, Cortes-Perez NG, Gruss A, Tamez-Guerra RS, Oliveira SC, et al. Intranasal immunization with recombinant Lactococcus lactis secreting murine interleukin-12 enhances antigen-specific Th1 cytokine production. Infect Imm. 2003;71(4):1887–96.Google Scholar
  17. Rochat T, Boudebbouze S, Gratadoux JJ, Blugeon S, Gaudu P, Langella P, et al. Proteomic analysis of spontaneous mutants of Lactococcus lactis: Involvement of GAPDH and arginine deiminase pathway in H2O2 resistance. Proteomics. 2012;12(11):1792–805.Google Scholar
  18. Torrents E, Buist G, Liu A, Eliasson R, Kok J, Gibert I, et al. The anaerobic (class III) ribonucleotide reductase from Lactococcus lactis. Catalytic properties and allosteric regulation of the pure enzyme system. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(4):2463–71.Google Scholar
  19. Tamarit J, Gerez C, Meier C, Mulliez E, Trautwein A, Fontecave M. The activating component of the anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase from Escherichia coli. An iron-sulfur center with only three cysteines. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(21):15669–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nielsen FS, Andersen PS, Jensen KF. The B form of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase from Lactococcus lactis consists of two different subunits, encoded by the pyrDb and pyrK genes, and contains FMN, FAD, and [FeS] redox centers. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(46):29359–65.Google Scholar
  21. Tachon S, Brandsma JB, Yvon M. NoxE NADH oxidase and the electron transport chain are responsible for the ability of Lactococcus lactis to decrease the redox potential of milk. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(5):1311–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Efler P, Kilstrup M, Johnsen S, Svensson B, Hagglund PM. Two Lactococcus lactis thioredoxin paralogues play different roles in responses to arsenate and oxidative stress. Microbiology. 2015;161:528–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ingmer H, Vogensen FK, Hammer K, Kilstrup M. Disruption and analysis of the clpB, clpC, and clpE genes in Lactococcus lactis: ClpE, a new Clp family in gram-positive bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(7):2075–83.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Elsholz AK, Hempel K, Pother DC, Becher D, Hecker M, Gerth U. CtsR inactivation during thiol-specific stress in low GC, Gram + bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2011;79(3):772–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cesselin B, Ali D, Gratadoux JJ, Gaudu P, Duwat P, Gruss A, et al. Inactivation of the Lactococcus lactis high-affinity phosphate transporter confers oxygen and thiol resistance and alters metal homeostasis. Microbiology. 2009;155(Pt 7):2274–81.Google Scholar
  26. Aranda J, Cortes P, Garrido ME, Fittipaldi N, Llagostera M, Gottschalk M, et al. Contribution of the FeoB transporter to Streptococcus suis virulence. Int Microbiol. 2009;12(2):137–43.Google Scholar
  27. Magnani D, Barre O, Gerber SD, Solioz M. Characterization of the CopR regulon of Lactococcus lactis IL1403. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(2):536–45.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Naikare H, Palyada K, Panciera R, Marlow D, Stintzi A. Major role for FeoB in Campylobacter jejuni ferrous iron acquisition, gut colonization, and intracellular survival. Infect Immun. 2006;74(10):5433–44.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Duwat P, Sourice S, Cesselin B, Lamberet G, Vido K, Gaudu P, et al. Respiration capacity of the fermenting bacterium Lactococcus lactis and its positive effects on growth and survival. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(15):4509–16.Google Scholar
  30. Pedersen MB, Garrigues C, Tuphile K, Brun C, Vido K, Bennedsen M, et al. Impact of aeration and heme-activated respiration on Lactococcus lactis gene expression: identification of a heme-responsive operon. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(14):4903–11.Google Scholar
  31. Aly KA, Beebe ET, Chan CH, Goren MA, Sepulveda C, Makino S, et al. Cell-free production of integral membrane aspartic acid proteases reveals zinc-dependent methyltransferase activity of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa prepilin peptidase PilD. MicrobiologyOpen. 2013;2(1):94–104.Google Scholar
  32. Strom MS, Bergman P, Lory S. Identification of active-site cysteines in the conserved domain of PilD, the bifunctional type IV pilin leader peptidase/N-methyltransferase of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(21):15788–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Poyart C, Trieu-Cuot P. A broad-host-range mobilizable shuttle vector for the construction of transcriptional fusions to beta-galactosidase in gram-positive bacteria. FEMS microbiol lett. 1997;156(2):193–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Drew D, Sjostrand D, Nilsson J, Urbig T, Chin CN, de Gier JW, et al. Rapid topology mapping of Escherichia coli inner-membrane proteins by prediction and PhoA/GFP fusion analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(5):2690–5.Google Scholar
  35. Linke K, Wolfram T, Bussemer J, Jakob U. The roles of the two zinc binding sites in DnaJ. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(45):44457–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Nicolaes V, El Hajjaji H, Davis RM, Van der Henst C, Depuydt M, Leverrier P, et al. Insights into the function of YciM, a heat shock membrane protein required to maintain envelope integrity in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2014;196(2):300–9.Google Scholar
  37. Vitale S, Fauquant C, Lascoux D, Schauer K, Saint-Pierre C, Michaud-Soret I. A ZnS(4) structural zinc site in the Helicobacter pylori ferric uptake regulator. Biochemistry. 2009;48(24):5582–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Riddles PW, Blakeley RL, Zerner B. Ellman’s reagent: 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) – a reexamination. Anal Biochem. 1979;94:75–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Asad LM, Medeiros DC, Felzenszwalb I, Leitao AC, Asad NR. Participation of stress-inducible systems and enzymes involved in BER and NER in the protection of Escherichia coli against cumene hydroperoxide. Mut Research. 2000;461(1):31–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Gostick DO, Griffin HG, Shearman CA, Scott C, Green J, Gasson MJ, et al. Two operons that encode FNR-like proteins in Lactococcus lactis. Mol Microbiol. 1999;31(5):1523–35.Google Scholar
  41. Outten CE, O'Halloran TV. Femtomolar sensitivity of metalloregulatory proteins controlling zinc homeostasis. Science. 2001;292(5526):2488–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. McCallum N, Brassinga AK, Sifri CD, Berger-Bachi B. Functional characterization of TcaA: minimal requirement for teicoplanin susceptibility and role in Caenorhabditis elegans virulence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(11):3836–43.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Veiga P, Bulbarela-Sampieri C, Furlan S, Maisons A, Chapot-Chartier MP, Erkelenz M, et al. SpxB regulates O-acetylation-dependent resistance of Lactococcus lactis peptidoglycan to hydrolysis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(27):19342–54.Google Scholar
  44. Lechat P, Hummel L, Rousseau S, Moszer I. GenoList: an integrated environment for comparative analysis of microbial genomes. Nuc Acids Res. 2008;36(Database issue):D469–474.Google Scholar
  45. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305(3):567–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  47. Biswas I, Gruss A, Ehrlich SD, Maguin E. High-efficiency gene inactivation and replacement system for gram-positive bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1993;175(11):3628–35.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Dower WJ, Miller JF, Ragsdale CW. High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli by high voltage electroporation. Nuc Acids Res. 1988;16(13):6127–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Holo H, Nes IF. High-Frequency Transformation, by Electroporation, of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris Grown with Glycine in Osmotically Stabilized Media. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989;55(12):3119–23.Google Scholar
  50. Israelsen H, Madsen SM, Vrang A, Hansen EB, Johansen E. Cloning and partial characterization of regulated promoters from Lactococcus lactis Tn917-lacZ integrants with the new promoter probe vector, pAK80. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61(7):2540–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Lechardeur D, Fernandez A, Robert B, Gaudu P, Trieu-Cuot P, Lamberet G, et al. The 2-Cys peroxiredoxin alkyl hydroperoxide reductase c binds heme and participates in its intracellular availability in Streptococcus agalactiae. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(21):16032–41.Google Scholar


© Roussel et al. 2015