Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Microbiology

Open Access

Correlations of mutations in katG, oxyR-ahpC and inhA genes and in vitro susceptibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosisclinical strains segregated by spoligotype families from tuberculosis prevalent countries in South America

  • Elis R Dalla Costa1, 2,
  • Marta O Ribeiro1,
  • Márcia SN Silva1, 3,
  • Liane S Arnold1,
  • Diana C Rostirolla1,
  • Patricia I Cafrune1, 4,
  • Roger C Espinoza5,
  • Moises Palaci6,
  • Maria A Telles7,
  • Viviana Ritacco8,
  • Philip N Suffys10,
  • Maria L Lopes11,
  • Creuza L Campelo12,
  • Silvana S Miranda15,
  • Kristin Kremer13,
  • Pedro E Almeida da Silva14,
  • Leila de Souza Fonseca2,
  • John L Ho9,
  • Afrânio L Kritski2 and
  • Maria LR Rossetti1, 3, 16Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Microbiology20099:39

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-39

Received: 30 April 2008

Accepted: 19 February 2009

Published: 19 February 2009

Abstract

Background

Mutations associated with resistance to rifampin or streptomycin have been reported for W/Beijing and Latin American Mediterranean (LAM) strain families of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A few studies with limited sample sizes have separately evaluated mutations in katG, ahpC and inhA genes that are associated with isoniazid (INH) resistance. Increasing prevalence of INH resistance, especially in high tuberculosis (TB) prevalent countries is worsening the burden of TB control programs, since similar transmission rates are noted for INH susceptible and resistant M. tuberculosis strains.

Results

We, therefore, conducted a comprehensive evaluation of INH resistant M. tuberculosis strains (n = 224) from three South American countries with high burden of drug resistant TB to characterize mutations in katG, ahpC and inhA gene loci and correlate with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) levels and spoligotype strain family. Mutations in katG were observed in 181 (80.8%) of the isolates of which 178 (98.3%) was contributed by the katG S315T mutation. Additional mutations seen included oxyR-ahpC; inhA regulatory region and inhA structural gene. The S315T katG mutation was significantly more likely to be associated with MIC for INH ≥2 μg/mL. The S315T katG mutation was also more frequent in Haarlem family strains than LAM (n = 81) and T strain families.

Conclusion

Our data suggests that genetic screening for the S315T katG mutation may provide rapid information for anti-TB regimen selection, epidemiological monitoring of INH resistance and, possibly, to track transmission of INH resistant strains.

Background

Tuberculosis (TB), a curable disease caused by M. tuberculosis, has never been adequately controlled in high prevalence countries because of inadequate funding of public health programs and limited access to health care caused by poverty. In the last several decades, the concurrent HIV epidemic has further accentuated the magnitude of the global TB burden. Further complicating the TB resurgence is the recent increase in the occurrence of simultaneous resistance to first line drugs, isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (RIF), that defines multidrug resistance (MDR), as well as, to second line drugs, resulting in extensive drug resistance (XDR) [1, 2]. Although current control measures and short-term treatment schemes address the problem of drug resistance, knowledge on individual drug resistance profiles is needed for targeted intervention [3]. Global surveillance of M. tuberculosis drug resistance has been proposed to guide appropriate treatment policies [4]. Brazil and Peru are responsible for approximately 50% of the new TB cases in the Americas [5, 2]. Moreover, 2,443 and 2,760 MDR-TB cases were reported respectively for Brazil from 2000 to 2006 [6] and Peru in just 2005 [7].

In the last years, molecular epidemiological approaches have shown that certain emerging M. tuberculosis strains, that induce more severe forms of TB, manifest higher failure/relapse than others. These features of certain isolates of M. tuberculosis strains, therefore, accentuate TB burden even in countries with good TB control programs, such as Vietnam [810]. Strains of the Beijing/W and Haarlem strain families of M. tuberculosis are emerging in certain global regions and are associated with drug resistance [11, 12]. Importantly, specific mutations have been described in M. tuberculosis genes that are associated with resistance to rifampin or streptomycin and noted particularly in W/Beijing and Latin-American & Mediterranean (LAM) strain families [13].

The current view, since Middlebrook's original description, is that INH resistant strains of M. tuberculosis are less virulent; whether INH resistant and catalase-negative strains are indeed attenuated has been recently questioned [14]. The mechanism for INH resistance is only partly elucidated. Resistance to INH is associated with mutations in several genes that include at least katG, inhA and ahpC. The katG gene encodes the enzyme catalase-peroxidase that functions to convert INH, which lacks anti-mycobactericidal activity, into an active compound [15]. The inhA (ORF) gene encodes an enoyl acyl carrier protein reductase involved in fatty acid synthesis. These fatty acids are the target of the active derivative of INH [4]. The inhA promoter gene region regulates the expression of an enoyl acyl carrier protein reductase. Mutations of this region may decrease the level of protein expression. The ahpC gene encodes alkyl-hydroperoxide reducatse involved in cellular regulation of oxidative stress [16]; mutations in the intergenic region oxyR-ahpC may also reduce the level of expression. The substitution of a single nucleotide of the amino acid at position 315 of katG (S→T), vary from 53% to 96% of INH resistant isolates [17, 18]. Importantly, it was shown that the katG S315T mutation is associated with INH resistance without diminishing the virulence or transmissibility of M. tuberculosis strains [3, 19]. The lack of attenuation associated with the katG S315T substitution and its high frequency among INH resistant clinical isolates suggests that the majority of these isolates will be virulent, and this premise was supported by a recent population-based molecular epidemiological study carried out in The Netherlands [20]. In this study, DNA fingerprinting demonstrated that, although INH resistant strains in general were less often transmitted between humans, the transmission of katG S315T mutants was similar to drug susceptible strains [20, 18].

There is a paucity of information regarding the frequency and types of gene mutations associated with INH resistance among M. tuberculosis strains from South America. Moreover, studies of mutations associated with INH resistance have been limited in the scope of the genes assessed, the number of isolates evaluated, and lacked correlation with in vitro INH levels determined by minimal inhibitory concentration. Thus, we conducted a comprehensive characterization of mutations in the katG, oxyR-ahpC, and inhA genes in over 200 INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates from three MDR high prevalence countries from South America, namely, Argentina, Peru and Brazil and correlated the mutational data with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) level for INH and strain families as determined by spoligotyping.

Results

Drug susceptibility testing

All isolates previously shown to be INH resistant by the proportion method were retested to determine the MIC levels. All isolates retested by MIC were INH resistant defined as ≥ 0.2 μg/mL. The majority of the isolates were resistant to ≥ 0.5 μg/mL INH.

Mutation frequency

We next characterized mutations in katG, ahpC and inhA (ORF or regulatory regions) gene loci. Among the 224 INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates, the katG gene was the most frequently mutated gene (80.8%; 181/224). A mutation in codon 315 of the katG gene was present in 178 isolates. At this codon, the substitution from AGC to ACC leading to the amino acid change serine to threonine (S to T), seen in 166 (74.1%) isolates. In addition, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) from AGC (S) to AAC (N) was seen in 9 isolates; and from AGC (S) to ACG (L) was noted for 3 isolates. In other regions of the katG gene, substitution SNPs were identified at codons 258, 299 and 300 (Table 1). We also screened for mutations in oxyR-ahpC and inhA (ORF and regulatory) gene loci previously reported to be associated with INH resistance. Mutations were also identified including in oxyR-ahpC (8.9%, n = 20 isolates), inhA regulatory gene region (9.8%, n = 22 isolates), and inhA ORF gene region (1.3%, n = 3 isolates) (see Table 1). Figure 1 depicts correlation of MIC level with frequencies of individual mutations and cumulative mutations. As shown, 99.8% of isolates with MIC ≤ 8 μg/mL present at least one mutation. The data suggest that with increasing MIC levels, the assessed mutations could account for or is associated with an increasingly greater proportion of isolates having the quantified resistance MIC level.
Table 1

Mutations identified in 224 INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates from South America

 

Specific mutation in each loci (number of isolates with mutation)

 

katG only

OxyR-ahpC only

inhA (reg) only

inhA (ORF) only

KatG and inhA (reg)

KatG and ahpC

No mutation*

Brazil

(176)

S315T (121)

S315N (5)

S315I (3)

G258D*** (1)

C(-15)T (1)

I20I (1)**/***

C(-39)T (3)

C(-30)T (1)

G(-6)A (2)

G(-32)A (1)

C(-15)T (7)

G(82)R*** (1)

W300R***/C(-15)T (1)

S315T/C(-15)T (8)

S315N/I20I**/*** (1)

G299S/G(-9)A (1)

S315T/G(-48)A (1)

17

Peru

(34)

S315T (19)

S315N (2)

C(-10)T (1)

C(-15)T (3)

S(94) R*** (1)

S315T/C(-15)T (1)

S315N/C(-10)A*** (1)

S315T/C(-10)A*** (3)

S315T/C(-15)T (1)

2

Argentina

(14)

S315T (9)

C(-15)T (1)

C(-10)T (1)

---

S(93)A*** (1)

S315T/C(-15)T (1)

---

1

Total 224

N = 160

N = 12

N = 10

N = 3

N = 11

N = 8

N = 20

*No mutation in studied loci.

**Silent mutation in the codon 20 of the ahpC gene.

***Not reported in the literature.

Figure 1

Correlation or MIC levels and percentage of strains bearing the studied mutations in Kat G, ahp C and inh A gene loci. Cumulative percent at each MIC level is derived by the number of isolates with any of the assessed mutations divided by all isolates × 100.

Country specific mutation frequency

The proportion of M. tuberculosis isolates with any katG mutation in the different countries was; Brazil (81.3%, n = 143), Peru (82.4%, n = 28), and Argentina (71.4%, n = 10) (p > 0.05); and the S315T katG mutation was: Brazil (74.4%, n = 131), Peru (73.5%, n = 25), and Argentina (71.4%, n = 10).

Spoligopatterns

The INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates (n = 224) were spoligotyped and segregated in strain families in which 86 different spoligotype patterns were identified. We next evaluated for shared spoligotype patterns in which 158 isolates clustering by spoligotyping matched with 27 international types (SITs, which had two or more isolates in an updated SpolDB4 [21] – Table 2). Other 30 isolates matched 30 individual SITs, reported as orphans by SpolDB4, Table 2. A third group of isolates (n = 36 [16.0% of the tested isolates] segregated into 29 newly identified spoligotype patterns (not reported by SpolDB4). The strain families that could be grouped by SpolDB4 included: LAM (46.4%, n = 104), Haarlem (16.0%, n = 36), T (14.3%, n = 32), X (6.2%, n = 14), S (4.5%, n = 10), U (4.9%, 11), W/Beijing (1.8%, n = 4), MANU2 (0.4%, n = 1). Twelve (4.8%) isolates had an unclassified spoligopattern. Five isolates were included as Haarlem because of their spoligotype signature but did not match any of the patterns in SpolDB4 [21].
Table 2

Frequency of 27 shared spoligotypes (SITs) according to Brudey et al. [21] identified in 158 INH resistant M. tuberculosis strains isolated from South America.

SIT

Octal

Strains in this n

Strains in n

Lineag

1

0000000000037

3

1.3

5610

13.2

Beijing

47

7777777740207

6

2.6

1021

2.4

Haarlem

602

7777777700007

2

0.9

48

0.1

U

50

7777777777207

19

8.5

2128

5.0

Haarlem

49

7777777777207

3

1.3

115

0.3

Haarlem3

20

6777776077607

9

4.0

588

1.4

LAM

17

6777376077607

6

2.4

473

1.1

LAM

33

7761776077607

8

3.6

770

1.8

LAM

4

0000000077607

3

1.3

220

0.5

LAM3/S

211

5761776077607

2

0.9

63

0.1

LAM

828

3777776077607

3

1.3

20

0.0

LAM

93

7777376077607

10

4.5

267

0.6

LAM

64

7777776075607

9

4.0

157

0.4

LAM

435

7637776077607

3

1.3

4

0.0

LAM

177

3777776077607

3

1.3

50

0.1

LAM

388

7377776077607

2

0.9

15

0.0

LAM

42

7777776077607

22

9.9

1926

4.5

LAM

1938

7763777777607

7

3.1

3

0.0

S

53

7777777777607

17

7.6

3738

8.8

T1

397

7777776000007

2

0.9

13

0.0

U

402

7777776000000

3

1.3

14

0.0

U

1241

7777776077007

3

1.3

28

0.0

U

119

7777767777607

2

0.9

659

1.8

X1

137

7777767777606

3

1.3

720

2.0

X2

92

7000767777607

3

1.3

328

0.8

X3

91

7000367777607

2

0.9

143

0.4

X3

60

7777776077607

3

1.3

83

0.2

LAM

Association between MIC levels, characterized mutations and spoligotype strain families

Higher level INH resistance (≥2 μg/mL) was significantly associated with the S315T katG mutation, as shown by a greater odds ratio of 1.97 (Table 3). Of note, in isolates with MIC ≥16 μg/mL (83.0%, n = 38) a mutation was found one or more of the studied genes. We next evaluated for potential the relationship between MIC levels and mutations and strain families. The S315T katG mutation was found in LAM isolates (77.9%, n = 81), Haarlem isolates (94.4%, n = 34), and in T isolates (68.7%, n = 22). Of the Beijing strains (n = 4), 3 presented with the S315T katG mutation. We noted a statistical association between Haarlem strain family with the S315T katG mutation (p = 0.01) (Table 3). When the specific S315T katG mutation was considered, the Haarlem genotype occurred more frequently among those M. tuberculosis strains with MIC ≥2 μg/mL (p = 0.02). The most frequent Haarlem spoligotype pattern was the shared international type (SIT) 50, which was found in 19 (52.7%) isolates and only one of these did not possess the S315T katG mutation. LAM strain family showed the highest frequency (46.2%, n = 104) among the 224 isolates which were distributed among 20 different SITs according to spolDB4 (Table 4). The LAM9 lineage was the most frequent LAM lineage (29.8%) identified in all three countries studied. In contrast to Haarlem, the LAM strain family was not associated with the S315T katG mutation (p = 0.58) nor with higher MIC values (p = 0.79) (Table 3). Among T family strains, 6 (18.8%) isolates were related to sub-clades T2, T3, T4 and T5; 22 (68.7%) isolates had the S315T mutation.
Table 3

315 mutation and its correlation with MIC and spoligotype families distribution in INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates

 

315 m

315 w

P value

OR (CI 95%)

MIC ≥2.0 μg/ml

    

   Yes

127

26

0.05

1.92 (0.93–3.93)

   No

51

20

  

Haarlem

    

   Yes

34

2

0.01

5.19 (1.15–3.25)

   No

144

44

  

LAM

    

   Yes

81

23

0.58

0.84 (0.42–1.68)

   No

97

23

  

T

    

   Yes

22

10

0.45

0.73 (0.30–1.80)

   No

144

48

  

315 m: mutated; 315 w: wild type

Table 4

Frequency of 57 shared spoligotypes (SITs) according to Brudey et al. [21], identified in 188 M. tuberculosis strains isolated with S315T mutation, from South America.

Lineage

SIT

Number of isolates

Number of DRE-PCR patterns

Number of isolates in cluster (%)

Beijing

1

3

2

2 (66.7)

Haarlem1

47

6

6

0

Haarlem3

50

19

16

6 (31.5)

Haarlem3

49

3

2

2 (66.7)

LAM1

20

9

4

7 (77.8)

LAM2

17

6

3

3 (50.0)

LAM3

33

8

4

4 (50.0)

LAM3/S convergent

4

3

2

2 (66.7)

LAM3

211

2

1

2 (100)

LAM4

828

3

3

0

LAM5

93

10

6

4 (40.0)

LAM6

64

9

6

2 (22.2)

LAM9

435

3

1

3 (100)

LAM9

177

3

3

0

LAM9

388

2

1

2 (100)

LAM9

42

22

12

14 (63.6)

S

1938

7

5

4 (57.0)

T1

53

17

11

4 (23.5)

U

397

3

2

2 (66.7)

U

402

2

2

0

U

1241

3

3

0

X1

119

3

3

0

X2

137

2

2

0

X3

92

3

2

2 (66.7)

X3

91

3

3

0

LAM4

60

2

2

0

U

602

2

2

0

T5-MAD2

58

1

Not done

Unique

LAM6

95

1

Not done

Unique

U (LAM3?)

106

1

Not done

Unique

T5

68

1

Not done

Unique

T3

157

1

Not done

Unique

T1

159

1

Not done

Unique

Haarlem3

207

1

Not done

Unique

T1

253

1

Not done

Unique

Beijing-Like

269

1

Not done

Unique

T1

353

1

Not done

Unique

T1

453

1

Not done

Unique

Haarlem3

631

1

Not done

Unique

S

707

1

Not done

Unique

S

827

1

Not done

Unique

LAM5-LAM6

867

1

Not done

Unique

X2

1341

1

Not done

Unique

T2

1355

1

Not done

Unique

LAM9

1535

1

Not done

Unique

LAM2

1691

1

Not done

Unique

LAM1

389

1

Not done

Unique

T1

276

1

Not done

Unique

Haarlem3

294

1

Not done

Unique

MANU2

1094

1

Not done

Unique

LAM5

176

1

Not done

Unique

T3

1655

1

Not done

Unique

LAM3

130

1

Not done

Unique

T4-CE1 ancestor?

65

1

Not done

Unique

Haarlem3-LAM9

335

1

Not done

Unique

T1

222

1

Not done

Unique

LAM3

1354

1

Not done

Unique

Frequency of INH resistance associated mutation in spoligotype strain families

To evaluate for genetic correlation of strains with the same spoligopatterns, DRE-PCR was performed on isolates presenting the same INH conferring mutation and the same spoligotype. DRE-PCR has previously been used to genetically classify strains with the same spoligotyped as being genetically related (or clustered isolates). The most frequently observed spoligotype patterns among isolates with the S315T katG mutation were SIT 42 (LAM9, 22 isolates) and SIT 50 (Haarlem3, 19 isolates). Among the isolates that had a SIT 42 spoligotype pattern and a S315T katG mutation, 12 different DRE-patterns were identified, presenting 14 (63.6%) isolates in four different clusters and 8 unique isolates. The isolates with a SIT 50 spoligotype showed 16 different DRE-patterns, presenting 6 (31.5%) isolates in three different clusters and 13 unique isolates (Table 4).

In total, 62 (27.6%) of S315T katG mutated isolates appeared distributed in 29 clusters, most of them with just two isolates per cluster. Of the INH resistant strains that did not have the S315T katG mutation, 19 (27.9%) were in clusters. The proportion of clustering was higher among LAM lineage M. tuberculosis isolates (40.7%; 33/81) carrying the S315T katG mutation than in LAM isolates without the S315T katG mutation (26%; 7/23). A higher proportion of clustering in which the S315T katG mutation was also noted for the few W/Beijing strains (50% (2/4). In contrast, the proportion of clustering in S315T katG mutated was lower for Haarlem isolates (23.5%, 8 of 34), T (18%, 4 of 22).

Discussion

Identification of markers for rapid determination of TB drug resistance is needed to combat the increasing prevalence of MDR TB. Mutations in select genes of M. tuberculosis have been used as correlates for anti-TB drug resistance. Prior reports have evaluated in a limited setting one or more of the gene loci evaluated by this report including, katG, ahpC, regulatory region of inhA, and the ORF region of inhA. However, none of these studies have comprehensively catalogued mutations in all of these loci in a single study and testing large numbers of clinical samples from TB prevalent regions such as, South America, nor have they correlated the identified mutations with INH MIC levels.

In this study, each clinical isolate was characterized for mutations not only in katG gene, but also in ahpC, regulatory region of inhA, and ORF region of inhA. Frequencies of katG mutation among INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates in three South American countries was: Brazil (81.3%), Peru (82.4%) and, Argentina (71.4%). Our study does not aim to provide a profile of the involved sites, but to characterize mutations from the available strains during the period. The frequency for the katG S315T mutation in INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates was comparable to the previously reported rate for patients diagnosed in Kuwait, Brazil and The Netherlands (65% and 55%, respectively) but was lower than described in Russia (95%) [13, 20, 22, 23].

In this study, we also correlated MIC levels with the katG S315T mutation in INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates. We demonstrated that 83.0% (n = 127) of the INH resistant strains with the katG S315T mutation possessed a MIC for INH ≥2 μg/mL (p = 0.05). These data are in accordance with The Netherlands report, where 95% of the INH strains with this mutation had a MIC for INH of > 2 μg/L (20). The mutation AGC to ACC at codon 315 tended also to be associated with MIC ≥2 μg/mL (p = 0.06; OR = 1.79 [confidence interval (CI): 0.92–3.49]). Part of the success of the katG S315T mutated isolates in the community is probably because the catalase-peroxidase enzyme is still active in these mutants; indeed, 30% to 40% of the initial catalase activity remains when this mutation is introduced into the katG gene by site-directed mutagenesis [19, 24].

Mutations in coding or regulatory regions of other genes such as the oxyR-ahpC region have also been associated with INH resistance, but occur less frequently [1]. Mutations of the oxyR-ahpC region have been described in 4.8% to 24.2% of INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates [2527, 15]. Usually, higher levels of INH resistance and/or loss of catalase activity are associated with mutations in inhA and ahpC genes [28, 29]. In the present study, few isolates had mutations in more than one gene. Eight isolates (3.6%) had mutations in both katG and oxyR-ahpC; 5 from Peru and 3 from Brazil (Table 1). Of note, M. tuberculosis isolates with the katG S315T mutation and inhA or ahpC, or inhA and ahpC genes tended to occur more frequently in isolates with a MIC for INH of ≥2 μg/mL, appearing in 22 isolates (p = 0.06; OR 0.95–4.8). After the katG gene, the inhA promoter gene was the second most frequently mutated gene, with mutation in 10% of the M. tuberculosis isolates. This frequency is in accordance to others, varying from 10% to 34.2%, described elsewhere [30, 31]. All mutations occurred in the regulatory region of the mabA-inhA operon with a C to T change at position -15, reported to be associated with INH resistance [32, 28]. Similarly as has been previously described by others, few mutations were identified in the inhA ORF [4, 23].

Frequencies of M. tuberculosis lineage found in our study were in range with frequencies described in recently published population-based studies performed in other South American countries [33, 34]. LAM family was the most frequent lineage found by this study, occurring among 46.4% of the INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates in our South American study population. This proportion is virtually identical to that found among INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates from Russia [13]. The Haarlem family was the second most frequent family, with a similar proportion of isolates belonging to the Haarlem family as reported in in Russia (10%) [12]. A high frequency of the katG S315T mutation in INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates of the Haarlem strain family was also described in South Africa [12] and Tunisia [35]. As with the W/Beijing family, the Haarlem family is widespread [36], and has mutations within putative mutator genes [37, 38]. Mutation in such genes may afford these strains a higher adaptability to hostile environments, following challenge by anti-TB drugs or engulfment within macrophages [38]. The Haarlem family appears to favor the emergence of MDR-TB strains, and was associated with outbreaks in Argentina [39], the Czech Republic [40] and Tunisia [35]. W/Beijing family strains, which are often associated with drug resistance, although prevalent in many regions of the world, are mostly localized in Asia and Eastern European countries [11, 8, 41, 42], and, at present, uncommon in Latin American countries [33, 34, 43, 44], which was confirmed by this study (only five W/Beijing isolates were identified). The T family occurred in 14.3% of our INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates, which is similar to the proportion reported in Paraguay (8.6%) and in Venezuela (13%) [22, 34]. As a descriptive study on selected M. tuberculosis isolates that were provided by the reference TB laboratories from different regions in Latin America, its limitation rely on the lack of generazibility. The available M. tuberculosis isolates included in the project have no aiming to be a representative from each country on the mutations profiles of INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates. The second phase of this study is underway: the evaluation of same techniques using randomly INH sensitive and INH resistant M. tuberculosis isolates isolated at National Drug Resistant Surveillance carried out in those countries in the last years.

Even though the application of DOTS has stabilized the prevalence of TB or has led to decline in some countries, drug-resistant TB is rapidly emerging in a significant number of areas in the world [2]. Under standard treatment regimens it is often not possible to identify primary drug-resistant cases and these regimens are therefore unsuitable for the control of drug-resistant strains. TB control thus relies on improving current TB diagnosis and early detection of drug-resistant TB, preferably using rapid and accurate screening tools other than the sole reliance on AFB smear and culture identification and susceptibility testing.

Conclusion

The present data indicate that screening for the katG S315T mutation may be useful in South America for an early detection of INH resistance and, hence, provide rapid information for selection of appropriate anti-TB therapy. This information may also be used as a marker to evaluate the transmissibility of INH resistant TB in the community. Our study also demonstrated an association between a high MIC and katG S315T mutation, as well as an association between the katG S315T mutation, and Haarlem strain family that may in part explain the successful spread of Haarlem strains in South America.

Methods

The present experimental research that is reported in the manuscript has been performed with the approval of an appropriate ethics committee and carried out within an ethical framework.

Mycobacterial strains

The M. tuberculosis isolates and respective data of INH susceptibility tests were kindly provided by the National Health Institute in Peru (n = 34), the Malbran Institute (n = 14) in Argentina and from seven Brazilian Institutes: Ceará State (CE) Central Laboratory (n = 25), Central Laboratory of Rio Grande do Sul State (RS, n = 24); Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (RJ, n = 32); Federal University of Espírito Santo (ES, n = 31); Adolfo Lutz Institute of Paulo State (SP, n = 23); Federal University of Minas Gerais (MG, n = 27); Evandro Chagas Institute, Pará (PA) (n = 14). These were the total number of strains provided by each site included in this study. All strains were collected from September 2003 to December 2004 and were identified to the species level by analysis of morphologic and biochemical characteristics [45]. Reference strain M. tuberculosis H37Rv ATCC 27294 was used as a control INH susceptible strain. The strains and the reference strain were tested for susceptibility by each site using the proportion method on Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium [46] in the absence and presence of 0.2 μg/ml for INH or no INH.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination

The test was performed as described by Palomino et al, 2002 [47]. The INH (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) stock solution was prepared at concentration of 10 mg/mL in sterile distilled water. Serial two-fold dilutions of INH in 100 μL of Middlebrook 7H9 broth medium (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) containing glycerol enriched with 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC) and Bacto Casitone (Difco) were prepared directly in 96-well flat-bottom microplates (Corning Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA) at final INH concentrations from 16 to 0.2 μg/mL (200 μL total volume). The inoculum was prepared from fresh LJ medium in Middlebrook 7H9 broth medium adjusted to a McFarland symbol.1 and then further diluted 1:20. A 100 μL aliquot of this dilution was added into each well. The microplates were covered, sealed in plastic bags, and incubated at 37°C in the normal atmosphere. After 7 days of incubation, 30 μL of resazurin solution was added to each well, incubated overnight at 37°C, and assessed for color development. Resazurin sodium salt powder (Acros Organic N.V.) prepared at 0.01% (wt/vol) in distilled water was used as a general indicator of cellular growth and viability. A change from blue to pink indicates reduction of resazurin and therefore bacterial growth. The MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration that presented no color change. The cut off value for resistance was ≥ 0.2 μg/mL according Palomino et al, 2002 [32]. Growth controls containing no INH and sterility controls without M. tuberculosis were included in each MIC testing.

Nucleic acid extraction

Chromosomal DNA was extracted from cultures on Löwenstein-Jensen medium, using the CTAB method as described by van Embden et al., 1993 [48].

Sequence analysis

The genes were amplified with the following primers (KatG 1. – 5' CAT GAA CGA CGT CGA AAC AG 3', KatG 2. – 5' CGA GGA AAC TGT TGT CCC AT 3'; ahpC 1. – 5' GCC TGG GTG TTC GTC ACT GGT 3', ahpC 2. – 5' CGC AAC GTC GAC TGG CTC ATA 3'; inhA (ORF) 1. – 5' GAA CTC GAC GTG CAA AAC 3', inhA (ORF) 2. – 5' CAT CGA AGC ATA CGA ATA 3'; inhA (reg) 1. – CCTCGCTGCCCAGAAAGGGA, inhA (reg) 2. – ATCCCCCGGTTTCCTCCGGT), yielding fragments of 232 bp, 359 bp, 206 bp and 248 bp, respectively. Amplifications were carried out in a thermocycler Mini-Cycler-Hot Bonnet PTC-100 (MJ Research, INC, EUA) as follows: 94°C for 2 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min, for 30 cycles. Amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels, purified with MicroSpin S-300 HR Columns (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and sequenced by using the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit with AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in the ABI Prism 3100 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

Spoligotyping

Spoligotyping was performed as described by Kamerbeek et al [49, 21]. To determine the spoligotype family, patterns were compared to those in the international database of spoligo patterns (SpolDB4). The double repetitive element (DRE) PCR was performed in accordance to Friedman, 1995 [50]. The term 'cluster' was used for two or more M. tuberculosis isolates with identical spoligotype and DRE-PCR patterns.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Epi Info (version 6.03, CDC, Atlanta, GA, US; public domain). Categorical variables were compared by the Fisher exact or chi-squared test. A confidence interval (CI) of 95% was used in all odds ratio (OR) calculations.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

FAPERGS; FINEP; Milênio Institute-CNPq – Process 420121/2005-6; European Union – TB adapt Project – Process 037919; International Scholarship – CNPq – process 201198/2005-3. Project ICOHRTA AIDS/TB, 5 U2R TW006883-02.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Foundation for Production and Research in Health (FEPPS)
(2)
Tuberculosis Academic Program – Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
(3)
Luterana University of Brazil
(4)
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
(5)
Blufstein Clinic Laboratory
(6)
Federal University of Espírito Santo
(7)
Adolfo Lutz Institute, IAL
(8)
Servicio de Micobacterias, Instittuto Nacional Enfermedades Infecciosas
(9)
Cornell University, Ithaca
(10)
Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Fiocruz
(11)
Evandro Chagas Institute, IEC
(12)
LACEN Ceará
(13)
Mycobacteria Reference Unit (CIb-LIS), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)
(14)
Federal Foundation of Rio Grande, FURG
(15)
Federal University of Minas Gerais
(16)
Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CDCT), Fundação Estadual de Produção e Pesquisa em Saúde (FEPPS), Av Ipiranga, 5400 3° andar

References

  1. Ramaswamy SVJ, Musser MJ: Molecular genetic basis of antimicrobial agent resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: 1998 update. Tubercle Lung Dis. 1998, 79 (1): 3-29. 10.1054/tuld.1998.0002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization: Global tuberculosis control: surveillance, planning, financing. WHO report, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen T, Becerra MC, Murray MB: Isoniazid resistance and the future of drug-resistant tuberculosis Microb Drug Resist. Microb Drug Resist. 2004, 10 (4): 280-285. 10.1089/mdr.2004.10.280.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee A, Dubnau E, Quemard A, Balasubramanian V, Um KS, Wilson T, Collins D, Lisle G, Jacobs JR: inhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 1994, 263: 227-230. 10.1126/science.8284673.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. BRASIL, 2004. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Vigilância Epidemiológica. Tuberculose. Dados e indicadores: Epidemiologia da TB no Brasil. Disponível em. [http://portal.saude.gov.br/saude]
  6. BRASIL, 2006. Ministério da Saúde: Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. CRPHF.Google Scholar
  7. Ministerio de Salud: Evaluación del Programa nacional de control de la Tuberculosis en el Perú-Año 1999 y 2000. LIMA 1999–2000 Informes anuales. 2002Google Scholar
  8. Glynn JR, Whiteley J, Bifani PJ: Worldwide occurrence of Beijing/W strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002, 8: 843-849.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lan NTN, Lien HTK, Tung LB, Borgdorff MW, Kremer K, van Soolingen D: Mycobaterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype and risk for treatment failure and relapse, Vietnam. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9 (12): 1633-1635.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Vree M, Bui DD, Dinh NS, Nguyen VC, Borgdorff MVV, Cobelens FG: Tuberculosis trends. Vietnam. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007, 13 (5): 796-797.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. European Concerted Action on New Generation Genetic Markers and Techniques for the Epidemiology and Control of Tuberculosis: Beijing/W genotype Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12: 736-743.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Marais BJ, Victor TC, Hesseling AC, Barnard M, Jordaan A, Brittle W, Reuter H, Beyers N, van Helden PD, Warren RM, Schaaf HS: Beijing and Haarlem genotypes are overrepresented among children with drug-resistant tuberculosis in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44 (10): 3539-43. 10.1128/JCM.01291-06.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lipin MY, Stepanshina VN, Shemyakin IG, Shinnick TM: Association of specific mutations in kat G, rpoB, rpsL and rrs genes with spoligotypes of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Russia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007, 13 (6): 620-6. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01711.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Middlebrook G, Cohn ML: Some observations on the pathogenicity of isoniazid-resistant variants of tubercle bacilli. Science. 1953, 118: 297-299. 10.1126/science.118.3063.297.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang M, Yue J, Yang Y, Zhang H, Lei J, Jin R, Zhang X, Wang H: Detection of Mutations Associated with Isoniazid Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from China. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 5477-5482. 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5477-5482.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Sherman DR, Mdluli K, Hickey MJ, Arain TM, Morris SL, Barry CE, Stover CK: Compensatory ahp C gene expression in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 1996, 272: 1641-1643. 10.1126/science.272.5268.1641.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Marttila HJ, Soini H, Eerola E, Vyshnevskaya E, Vyshnevskiy BI, Otten TF, Vasilyef AV, Viljanen MK: A Ser315Thr substitution in Kat G is predominant in genetically heterogeneous multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates originating from the St Petersburg area in Russia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998, 42: 2443-2445.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. van Soolingen D, de Haas PE, van Doorn HR, Kuijper E, Rinder H, Borgdorff MW: Mutations at amino acid position 315 of the kat G gene are associated with high-level resistance to isoniazid, other drug resistance, and successful transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the Netherlands. J Infect Dis. 2000, 182: 1788-1790. 10.1086/317598.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pym AS, Saint-Joanis B, Cole ST: Effect of kat G Mutations on the Virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the Implication for Transmission in Humans. Infection and Immunity. 2002, 70: 4955-4960. 10.1128/IAI.70.9.4955-4960.2002.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. van Doorn HR, de Haas PEW, Kremer K, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJ, Borgdorff MW, van Soolingen D: Public health impact of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with a mutation at amino-acid position 315 of katG: a decade of experience in The Netherlands. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006, 12: 769-775.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Brudey K, Driscoll JR, Rigouts L, Prodinger WM, Gori A, Al-Hajoj SA, Allix C, Aristimuno L, et al: Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genetic diver sity: mining the fourth international spoligotyping database (SpolDB4) for classification, population genetics and epidemiology. BMC Microbiol. 2006, 6: 23-10.1186/1471-2180-6-23.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ahmad S, Mokaddas E: Contribution of AGC to ACC and other mutations at codon 315 of the kat G gene in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from the Middle East. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004, 23: 473-479. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.10.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Silva MSN, Senna S, Ribeiro MO, Valim AM, Telles MA, Kritski AL, Morlock GP, Cooksey RC, Zaha A, Rossetti MLR: Mutations in kat G, InhA, and ahpC Genes of Brazilian Isoniazid-Resistant Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41 (9): 4471-4474. 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4471-4474.2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Rouse DA, DeVito JA, Li Z, Byer H, Morris SL: Site directed mutagenesis of the kat G gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: effects on catalase-peroxidase activities isoniazid resistance. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 22: 583-592. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.00133.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cardoso RF, Cooksey RC, Morlock GP, Barco P, Cecon L, Forestiero F, Leite CQF, Sato DN, Shikama ML, Mamizuka EM, Hirata MH: Screening and characterization of mutations in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Brazil. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 3378-3381. 10.1128/AAC.48.9.3373-3381.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelly CL, Rouse DA, Morris SL: Analysis of ahp C gene mutations in isoniazid-resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41 (9): 2057-2058.Google Scholar
  27. Lee ASG, Teo ASM, Wong SY: Novel mutations in ndh in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Antimicrob Agentes Chemother. 2001, 45: 2157-2159. 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2157-2159.2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Raviglione MC, Smith IM: XDR Tuberculosis – Implications for Global Public Health. New Engl J Med. 2007, 356 (7): 356-359. 10.1056/NEJMp068273.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Srinivas V, Ramaswamy SV, Reich R, Dou SJ, Jasperse L, Pan X, Wanger A, Quitugua T, Graviss EA: Single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47: 1241-1250. 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1241-1250.2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kiepiela PK, Bishop KS, Smith AN, Roux L, York DF: Genomic mutations in the kat G, inhA and ahpC genes are useful for the prediction of isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Kwazulu Natal, South Africa. Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000, 80: 47-56. 10.1054/tuld.1999.0231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim SY, Park YJ, Kim WI, Lee SH, Chang CL, Kang SJ, Kang CS: Molecular analysis of isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates recovered from South Korea. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003, 47: 497-502. 10.1016/S0732-8893(03)00132-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Lavender C, Globan M, Sievers A, Billman-Jacobe H, Fyfe J: Molecular characterization of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates collected in Australia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005, 49: 4068-4074. 10.1128/AAC.49.10.4068-4074.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Artismunõ L, Armengol R, Cebollada A, Mercedes E, Guilarte A, Lafoz C, Lezcano MA, Revillo MJ, Martín C, Ramírez C, Rastogi N, Rojas J, Salas AV, Sola C, Samper S: Molecular characterisation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in the First National Survey of Anti-tuberculosis Drug Resistance from Venezuela. BMC Microbiology. 2006, 6: 90-10.1186/1471-2180-6-90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Candia N, Lopez B, Zozio T, Carrivale M, Diaz C, Russomando G, de Romero NJ, Jará JC, Barrera L, Rastogi N, Ritacco V: First insight into Mycobacterium tuberculosis genetic diversity in Paraguay. BMC Microbiology. 2007, 7: 75-10.1186/1471-2180-7-75.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Mardassi H, Namouchi A, Haltiti R: Tuberculosis due to resistant Haarlem strain, Tunisia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 957-961.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Filliol I, Driscoll JR, van Soolingen D, Kreiswirth BN, Kremer K, Valetudie G, et al: Global distribution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis spoligotypes. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002, 8: 1347-9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Olano J, López B, Reyes A, Del Pilar Lemos M, Correa N, Del Portillo P, Barrea L, Robledo J, Ritacco V, Zambrano MM: Mutations in DNA repair genes are associated with the Haarlem lineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis independently of their antibiotic resistance. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2007, 87 (6): 502-8. 10.1016/j.tube.2007.05.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Rad ME, Bifani P, Martin C, Kremer K, Samper S, Rauzier J, Kreiswirth B, Blazquez J, Jouan M, van Soolingen D, Gicquel B: Mutations in putative mutator genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains of the W-Beijing family. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9: 838-845.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Ritacco V, Di Lonardo M, Reniero A, Ambroggi M, Barrera L, Dambrosi A, Lopez B, Isola N, de Kantor IN: Nosocomial spread of human immunodeficiency virus-related multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Buenos Aires. J Infect Dis. 1997, 176: 637-42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kubin M, Havelkova M, Hynccicova I, Svecova Z, Kaustova J, Kremer KA: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis microepidemic caused by genetically closely related Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 2715-6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Prodinger WM, Bunyaratvej P, Prachaktam R, Pavlic M: Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates of Beijing genotype in Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001, 7: 483-4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Qian L, Van Embden JD, Zanden Van Der AG, Weltevreden EF, Duanmu H, Douglas JT: Retrospective analysis of the Beijing family of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in preserved lung tissues. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 471-4.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Morcillo N, Di Giulio B, Chirico C, Kuriger A, Dolmann A, Alito A, Zumarraga M, van Soolingen D, Kremer K, Cataldi A: First description of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype in Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2005, 37: 92-95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ritacco V, López B, Cafrune PI, Ferrazoli L, Suffys PN, Candia N, Vásquez L, Realpe T, Fernández T, Lima KV, Zurita J, Robledo J, Rossetti L, Telles MA, Kritski AL, Palomino JC, Heersma H, van Soolingen D, Kremer K, Barrera LE: Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains of the Beijing genotype are rarely observed in tuberculosis patients in South America. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2008, 103: 489-492. 10.1590/S0074-02762008000500014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Collins C, Grange HJM, Yates MD: Tuberculosis bacteriology organization and practice. Public health mycobacteriology: A guide for a level III laboratory. Edited by: Kent PT, Kubica GP. 1985, Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; Atlanta, GA, USA: Centers for Disease Control, 2Google Scholar
  46. Canetti GW, Fox A, Khomenko HT, Mahler NK, Menon DA, Mitchison N, Rist N, Smeley NA: Advances in techniques of testing mycobacterial drug sensitivity, and the use of sensitivity tests in tuberculosis control programmes. Bull WHO. 1969, 41: 21-43.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Montoro E, Lemus D, Echemendia M, Martin A, Portaels F, Palomino JC: Comparative evaluation of the nitrate reduction assay, the MTT test, and the resazurin microtitre assay for drug susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2005, 55: 500-505. 10.1093/jac/dki023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Embden JDA, Cave MD, Crawford JD, Dale JW, Eisenach KD, Gicquel B, Hermans WM, Martin C, Mcadam R, Shinnick MT, Small PM: Strain Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1993, 31: 406-409.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, van Embden J: Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 907-914.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Friedman CR, Stoeckle MY, Johnson WD, Riley LW: Double-repetitive-element PCR method for subtyping M. tuberculosis clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33: 1383-1384.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Costa et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement