Open Access

Pathway analysis for intracellular Porphyromonas gingivalis using a strain ATCC 33277 specific database

  • Erik L Hendrickson1,
  • Qiangwei Xia1, 2, 4,
  • Tiansong Wang1, 2,
  • Richard J Lamont3 and
  • Murray Hackett1Email author
BMC Microbiology20099:185

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-185

Received: 20 March 2009

Accepted: 1 September 2009

Published: 1 September 2009

Abstract

Background

Porphyromonas gingivalis is a Gram-negative intracellular pathogen associated with periodontal disease. We have previously reported on whole-cell quantitative proteomic analyses to investigate the differential expression of virulence factors as the organism transitions from an extracellular to intracellular lifestyle. The original results with the invasive strain P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 were obtained using the genome sequence available at the time, strain W83 [GenBank: AE015924]. We present here a re-processed dataset using the recently published genome annotation specific for strain ATCC 33277 [GenBank: AP009380] and an analysis of differential abundance based on metabolic pathways rather than individual proteins.

Results

Qualitative detection was observed for 1266 proteins using the strain ATCC 33277 annotation for 18 hour internalized P. gingivalis within human gingival epithelial cells and controls exposed to gingival cell culture medium, an improvement of 7% over the W83 annotation. Internalized cells showed increased abundance of proteins in the energy pathway from asparagine/aspartate amino acids to ATP. The pathway producing one short chain fatty acid, propionate, showed increased abundance, while that of another, butyrate, trended towards decreased abundance. The translational machinery, including ribosomal proteins and tRNA synthetases, showed a significant increase in protein relative abundance, as did proteins responsible for transcription.

Conclusion

Use of the ATCC 33277 specific genome annotation resulted in improved proteome coverage with respect to the number of proteins observed both qualitatively in terms of protein identifications and quantitatively in terms of the number of calculated abundance ratios. Pathway analysis showed a significant increase in overall protein synthetic and transcriptional machinery in the absence of significant growth. These results suggest that the interior of host cells provides a more energy rich environment compared to the extracellular milieu. Shifts in the production of cytotoxic fatty acids by intracellular P. gingivalis may play a role in virulence. Moreover, despite extensive genomic re-arrangements between strains W83 and 33277, there is sufficient sequence similarity at the peptide level for proteomic abundance trends to be largely accurate when using the heterologous strain annotated genome as the reference for database searching.

Background

The Gram-negative anaerobe Porphyromonas gingivalis is an important periodontal pathogen. Amongst the most common infections of humans, periodontal diseases are a group of inflammatory conditions that lead to the destruction of the supporting tissues of the teeth [1] and may be associated with serious systemic conditions, including coronary artery disease and preterm delivery of low birth weight infants [2]. P. gingivalis is a highly invasive intracellular oral pathogen [3] that enters gingival epithelial cells through manipulation of host cell signal transduction and remains resident in the perinuclear area for extended periods without causing host cell death [4]. The intracellular location appears to be an integral part of the organism's lifestyle and may contribute to persistence in the oral cavity. Epithelial cells can survive for prolonged periods post infection [5] and epithelial cells recovered from the oral cavity show high levels of intracellular P. gingivalis [6, 7]. Intracellular P. gingivalis is also capable of spreading between host cells [8].

We have previously reported a whole-cell quantitative proteomic analysis of the change in P. gingivalis between extracellular and intracellular lifestyles [9]. P. gingivalis strain ATCC 33277 internalized within human gingival epithelial cells (GECs) was compared to strain ATCC 33277 exposed to gingival cell culture medium. The analysis focused on well-known or suspected virulence factors such as adhesins and proteases and employed the genome annotation of P. gingivalis strain W83. In order to be effective, quantitative proteomic analysis requires that mass spectometry results be matched to an annotated genome sequence to specifically identifiy the detected proteins. At the time, the only available whole genome annotation for P. gingivalis was that of strain W83 [10]. Recently, the whole genome sequence of P. gingivalis strain ATCC 33277 was published [11].

We re-analyzed the proteomics data using the P. gingivalis strain ATCC 33277 genome annotation. Use of the strain specific genome annotation increased the number of detected proteins as well as the sampling depth for detected proteins. As the quantitative accuracy of whole genome shotgun proteomics is dependent on sampling depth [12] the new analysis was expected to provide a more accurate representation of the changes in protein relative abundance between intracellular and extracellular lifestyles.

Given the prolonged periods of intracellular residence [4, 5] it is likely that, in addition to changes in virulence factors, metabolic changes in response to the intracellular environment may play an inportant role in the intracellular lifestyle of P. gingivalis, including shifts in energy pathways and metabolic end products [13].

Results and discussion

Re-analysis using the P. gingivalis strain ATCC 33277 genome annotation

The proteomics data previously analyzed using the strain W83 genome annotation [GenBank: AE015924] [9] was recalculated employing the strain specific P. gingivalis strain ATCC 33277 annotation [GenBank: AP009380]. Accurately identifying a proteolytic fragment using mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics as coming from a particular protein requires matching the MS data to a protein sequence. Differences in amino acid sequence between the proteins expressed by strain ATCC 33277 and the protein sequences derived from the strain W83 genome annotation rendered many tryptic peptides from the whole cell digests employed unidentifiable in the original analysis [9]. Given that the quantitative power of the whole cell proteome analysis is dependent on the number of identified peptides [12, 14], the new analysis was expected to give a more complete picture of the differential proteome, an expectation that proved accurate. In addition, some proteins in the strain ATCC 33277 genome are completely absent in the strain W83 genome and were thus qualitatively undetectable in the original analysis.

Overall, 1266 proteins were detected with 396 over-expressed and 248 under-expressed proteins observed from internalized P. gingivalis cells compared to controls (Table 1). Statistics based on multiple hypothesis testing and abundance ratios for all detected proteins can be found in Additional file 1: Table S1, as well as pseudo M/A plots [15] of the entire dataset. The consensus assignment given in Additional file 1: Table S1 of increased or decreased abundance was based on two inputs, the q-values for comparisons between internalized P. gingivalis and gingival growth medium controls as determined by spectral counting and summed signal intensity from detected peptides that map to a specific ORF [9, 14, 15]. If one or the other of the spectral counting or protein intensity indicated a significant change (q ≤ 0.01) and the other measure showed at least the same direction of change with a log2 ratio of 0.1 or better, then the consensus was considered changed in that direction, coded red for over-expression or green for under-expression. A simple "beads on a string" genomic map of the consensus calls is shown in Fig. 1.
Figure 1

Map of relative abundance trends based on the ATCC 33277 gene order and annotation. This plot shows the entire set of consensus calls given in Additional file 1: Table S1 arranged by ascending PGN number [11], which follows the physical order of genes in the genome sequence. Color coding: red indicates increased relative protein abundance for internalized P. gingivalis, green decreased relative abundance, grey indicates qualitative non-detects and black indicates an unused ORF number.

Table 1

A comparison of the proteomics results employing either the W83 [10] or ATCC 33277 [11] genome annotations.

  

ATCC 33277

    
  

Increased

Decreased

Unchanged

Not detected

Total

W83

 

396

248

622

 

1266

Increased

380

242

10

124

4

 

Decreased

235

5

140

79

11

 

Unchanged

570

93

75

345

57

 

Not detected

 

56

23

74

  

Total

1185

     

The numbers of proteins showing increased, decreased or unchanged abundance in the internalized state for each analysis are given. Entries indicate the number of proteins from each category in one analysis that are assigned to the categories in the other analysis, including proteins that are not detected in a specific analysis.

Whole cell proteomics measurements of this type are noisy and the trade off between quantitative FDR (false discovery rate) and FNR (false negative rate) is made based on the informed judgment of the analyst, and often tends to be ad hoc and arbitrary in practice [9, 14]. The q-value cut-off of 0.01 used here for statistical significance based on formal hypothesis testing was in good agreement with experimentally derived error distributions, as illustrated by the two pseudo M/A plots given in Additional file 1. The present findings serve to show the value of examining trends in groups of proteins, both as an end in itself with respect to biological questions and as feedback in the determination of proper cut-off values for the quantitative significance testing of individual proteins. As proteomics technology improves and it becomes economically feasible to run a greater number of independent cultures (biological replicates) than what was possible here, the overall noise issue in any one set of measurements will be less of a concern, and it will be easier to distinguish biological noise from deficiencies with respect to analytical repeatability, and thus identify biological trends that are truly significant rather than stochastically driven. Nonetheless, as in our previous work [9] the trends identified here are consistent with what we know about the behavior of the organism under intracellular conditions [3, 9, 16].

Comparison between W83 and ATCC 33277 annotations for proteomics

As expected, the new analysis identified more proteins, 1266 proteins compared to 1185 in the previous analysis (Table 1). The number of proteins with statistically significant changes between internalized and medium incubated cells also increased, from 380 proteins with increased abundance to 396 proteins and from 235 proteins with decreased abundance to 248 proteins. This was a consequence of the higher number of proteolytic fragments detected across the proteome. However, there was a fairly large shift as to which proteins made the cut-off for statistically significant change: 168 proteins called unchanged in the W83 analysis now show statistically significant changes in the ATCC 33277-based analysis, while 203 proteins previously called significantly different no longer make the cut-off (Table 1), at q ≤ 0.01. This is not surprising as values reasonably close to the cut-off point for significance would be expected to be very sensitive to changes in protein detection and sampling depth, with a small shift in the peptides involved in the calculations moving the protein over or under the significance cut-off point. A small number of proteins, 15, switched trend direction, moving from statistically significant increased or reduced abundance in internalized cells in the W83 analysis to the opposite trend in the ATCC 33277 analysis. The 15 proteins are listed in Table 2. In every case these 15 proteins showed inconsistency between two control cultures. In these cases the direction of change differed between the two controls with one control giving statistically significant change in one direction and the other giving change in the other direction but without making the statistical cut-off. Again, we saw shifts in borderline cases, in these 15 instances enough to shift the direction of abundance change. We also found that some proteins detected using the W83 genome annotation were no longer detected using the ATCC 33277 annotation. In most cases this was due to the presence of a second similar protein in the ATCC 33277 annotation, but not in the W83 annotation. Peptides that could not be unambiguously assigned to a single protein were not retained for the finished dataset given in Additional file 1: Table S1. The presence of the same peptide sequence in another protein eliminated the data from consideration both here and in the original W83-based analysis. Despite the shifts in assigned q-values and abundance ratio magnitudes as a consequence of the change in annotations, the abundance trends observed for P. gingivalis virulence factors did not differ greatly from those reported previously [9], except as noted in Table 2.
Table 2

The 15 proteins with opposite abundance trends.

PGN0148

conserved domain protein

PGN0152

immunoreactive 61 kDa antigen PG91

PGN0294

ragB lipoprotein RagB

PGN0302

rubrerythrin

PGN0503

mmdC methylmalonyl-CoA decarboxylase gamma subunit

PGN0678

thiL thiamine monophosphate kinase

PGN0914

peptidase M24 family

PGN1032

hypothetical protein PG_0914

PGN1403

acetylornithine aminotransferase putative

PGN1529

oxidoreductase putative

PGN1590

rplM ribosomal protein L13

PGN1830

TonB-dependent receptor putative

PGN1849

rplO ribosomal protein L15

PGN1904

hemagglutinin protein HagB

PGN2070

hypothetical protein PG_2204

Out of 1,113 detected (see Table 1) using both annotations, these 15 proteins showed inconsistent trends for significant (q ≤ 0.01) abundance change depending on whether the W83 [10] or ATCC 33277 [11] genome annotations were used for database searching. The ORF numbers and descriptors given are those for ATCC 33277.

Metabolic pathways differentially regulated in internalized P. gingivalis

The consensus assignments (see Additional file 1: Table S1) of differentially expressed proteins were used to populate metabolic pathways. The results were analyzed manually using the ATCC 33277 genome annotation [11]. In addition, an ontology analysis was done using DAVID (the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integration Discovery) to identify over- or under-expressed ontology categories [17]. Putative changed categories were then checked manually. DAVID has proven to be useful for prokaryotes when compared with other ontology programs [18].

Energy metabolism

P. gingivalis is an asaccharolytic bacterium and cannot survive on glucose or carbohydrates alone. While some genes for carbohydrate metabolism are found in the genome, P. gingivalis derives its energy from the metabolism of amino acids [11, 13]. Takahashi and colleagues measured amino acid usage in culture and found that glutamate/glutamine and aspartate/asparagine were preferentially metabolized [13]. When grown on dipeptides of these substrates, P. gingivalis produced different amounts of metabolic byproducts. Importantly, aspartylaspartate produced significantly higher amounts of acetate, which is associated with ATP formation (Fig. 2 and Additional file 1: Table S1). Internalized P. gingivalis cells showed an increase in the energy pathway from aspartate/asparagine to acetate and energy (Fig. 2). The corollary of this trend is that the intracellular environment is energy rich for P. gingivalis. Interestingly, the protein that converts glutamate, the other favored amino acid, to 2-oxoglutarate (PGN1367, glutamate dehydrogenase) showed a decrease in abundance (Fig. 2). This may represent a preference for energy production in internalized cells or be part of a more general shift in the metabolic byproducts. We also observed a decrease in protein abundance of maltodextrin phosphorolase (PGN0733). Maltodextrin phospholase plays a role in digesting starches and, despite being an asaccharolytic organism, P. gingivalis may make some use of the starches available in the oral cavity, but restricts this activity after internalization.
Figure 2

Metabolic Map of Energy and Cytotoxin Production. Proteins catalyzing each step are shown by their P. gingivalis PGN designation. Red up arrows indicate increased levels upon internalization, green down arrows decreased levels, and yellow squares no statistical change. Acetyl-CoA appears as a substrate and product at multiple points and is shown in purple. Metabolites and metabolic precursors discussed in the text are shown in bold.

Cytotoxic byproducts

P. gingivalis metabolism produces several short chain fatty acid byproducts that are cytotoxic (Fig. 2) and has been found to shift production between these compounds depending on growth conditions [13]. We have found a general increase in the pathway from 2-oxoglutarate to the cytotoxin propionate while the proteins in the pathways for production of the cytotoxin butyrate showed unchanged or reduced expression (Fig. 2). This is consistent with hints that byproduct production shifts away from butyrate and towards propionate during P. gingivalis infections [19]. The results are the opposite of what would be expected from substrate studies. As mentioned previously, the proteomics shows an increase in the aspartate/asparagine pathway and a reduction in glutamate/glutamine. Culture growth studies found that P. gingivalis grown on aspartylaspartate had significantly more butyrate production than propionate compared to cultures grown on glutamylglutamate [13]. However, a recent flux balance model of P. gingivalis metabolism predicts that there is abundant flexibility in the production of butyrate, propionate and succinate with the metabolic routes to each being equivalent with respect to redox balancing and energy production [20]. Thus a shift towards propionate could be easily explained if it presented an advantage to internalized cells. In that regard, it has been shown that butyrate is a more potent apoptosis inducing agent than propionate [21]. Hence, the diminished production of butyrate by internalized P. gingivalis may contribute to the resistance of P. gingivalis-infected GECs to apoptotic cell death [22]. There is also the question of the reduced abundance of glutamate dehydrogenase (PGN1367), the protein that converts glutamate to 2-oxoglutarate (Fig. 2). If this is the primary substrate for propionate production it could limit that production even with increased abundance in the rest of the pathway. However, 2-oxoglutarate is a common metabolic intermediate and glutamate/glutamine may not be the only source of 2-oxoglutarate for propionate production. Even if it is the primary source, given the flexibility in byproduct production, a significant shift away from butyrate production from glutamate/glutamine to propionate production could still occur in the presence of an overall reduction in glutamate/glutamine usage. Interestingly, some similar shifts are seen between planktonic cells and biofilms of P. gingivalis strain W50. A mass spectrometry analysis of planktonic cells versus biofilm cells identified 81 proteins and found several energy metabolism proteins with significant differences between planktonic and biofilm lifestyles [23]. In biofilms fumarate reductase (PGN0497, 0498) had reduced abundance while oxaloacetate decarboxylase (PGN0351) had increased abundance similar to what we see in internalized cells (Fig. 2). Obviously, biofilms and the interior of GECs are different environments, and the energy metabolism protein glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (PGN0173) was increased in biofilms [23] relative to planktonic cells, while it is decreased in internalized cells relative to external controls. A comparison between the two conditions would really require the identification of more metabolic proteins from biofilm cells, but given the relevance of biofilm formation to P. gingivalis pathogenicity in vivo [2426], the relation between biofilm conditions and internalized cells is an interesting one that we intend to pursue further at the whole proteome level.

Translation machinery

Proteomics revealed a significant increase in proteins responsible for translation, including many of the ribosomal proteins (Table 3, 4 and 5, Additional file 1: Table S1). Increased abundance of ribosomal proteins is seen under conditions of increased growth rate in all domains of life [2729]. However, we have found that internalized P. gingivalis maintain viability and replicate slowly within gingival epithelial cells [3]. Thus, an overall increase in protein expression due to increased energy production may be responsible for the increased abundance of translational machinery, more so than growth under these conditions.
Table 3

A list of detected proteins, by P. gingivalis PGN number [11], assigned to ribosomal proteins as determined using DAVID.

Increased (32)

Unchanged (19)

Decreased Levels (1)

PGN_0035

PGN_0167

PGN_0640

PGN_0965

PGN_0394

PGN_0188

PGN_0279

PGN_1572

PGN_1589

 

PGN_0636

PGN_0639

PGN_1647

PGN_1648

 

PGN_0641

PGN_0964

PGN_1698

PGN_1844

 

PGN_1088

PGN_1219

PGN_1651

PGN_1852

 

PGN_1573

PGN_1575

PGN_1853

PGN_1854

 

PGN_1588

PGN_1590

PGN_1855

PGN_1861

 

PGN_1832

PGN_1840

PGN_1863

PGN_1868

 

PGN_1842

PGN_1843

PGN_1872

PGN_1890

 

PGN_1849

PGN_1850

PGN_1891

  

PGN_1856

PGN_1857

   

PGN_1857

PGN_1858

   

PGN_1860

PGN_1862

   

PGN_1864

PGN_1865

   

PGN_1866

PGN_1867

   

PGN_1869

PGN_1871

   

Proteins are indicated as increased, decreased or unchanged in abundance for internalized P. gingivalis versus external control cells. The totals for each category are given in parentheses.

Table 4

A list of detected proteins, by P. gingivalis PGN number [11], assigned to translation initiation, elongation and termination as determined using DAVID.

Increased (8)

Unchanged (3)

Decreased Levels (0)

PGN_0355

PGN_0963

PGN_0313

PGN_1014

 

PGN_1405

PGN_1578

PGN_1244

  

PGN_1587

PGN_1846

   

PGN_1870

PGN_2022

   

Proteins are listed by ORF number in the same manner as in Table 3.

Table 5

A list of detected proteins, by P. gingivalis PGN number [11], assigned to tRNA synthetases and transferases as determined using DAVID.

Increased (16)

Unchanged (8)

Decreased Levels (3)

PGN_0209

PGN_0360

PGN_0137

PGN_0278

PGN_0266

PGN_0278

PGN_0365

PGN_0517

PGN_0281

PGN_0366

PGN_1157

 

PGN_0543

PGN_0570

PGN_0569

PGN_0981

  

PGN_0819

PGN_0962

PGN_1711

PGN_1883

  

PGN_0987

PGN_1218

    

PGN_1229

PGN_1381

    

PGN_1805

PGN_1969

    

PGN_2045

PGN_2060

    

Proteins are listed by ORF number in the same manner as in Table 3.

Transcription machinery

Most of the proteins responsible for transcription also showed increased abundance (Table 6, Additional file 1: Table S1). This is consistent with the overall increase in translational machinery as well as the larger number of proteins showing increased versus decreased abundance within gingival epithelial cells.
Table 6

A list of detected proteins, by P. gingivalis PGN number [11], assigned to transcription as determined using DAVID.

Increased (7)

Unchanged (3)

Decreased (0)

PGN_0423

PGN_0638

PGN_0792

PGN_1190

 

PGN_1570

PGN_1571

PGN_1202

  

PGN_1576

PGN_1578

   

PGN_1630

    

Proteins are listed by ORF number in the same manner as in Table 3.

Conclusion

P. gingivalis is an opportunistic, intracellular pathogen that survives for extended periods of time within gingival epithelial cells without causing excessive harm to the host and thus provides a window into host cell adaptive responses by pathogens [35]. Re-analysis of whole cell proteomics data using the recently published strain specific genome annotation for ATCC 33277 allowed several novel conclusions. As expected, the strain specific annotation yielded better overall proteome coverage and sampling depth at the level of the number of proteins identified. However, most of the overall trends identified for major P. gingivalis virulence factors and other proteins using the W83 genome annotation remain unchanged, showing the viability of employing similar annotations when a strain specific sequence is unavailable. This observation is especially important for oral and gut microbes, where a rapidly increasing body of genomic and RNA-Seq data suggests that genomic re-arrangements in the absence of major changes in amino acid sequence for the expressed proteins may be a widespread occurrence. Although some differences in protein primary structure exist among P. gingivalis strains [30], the primary differences observed by Naito et al. are extensive genome re-arrangements [11]. The proteomic methods used here are highly sensitive to sequence similarity, but not at all to the order in which genes occur on the chromosome. However, the ways in which proteome data are interpreted in terms of operon and regulon structure are greatly influenced by the physical arrangement of the genome.

When the data were organized in terms of metabolic pathways the whole cell proteomics analysis revealed what appears to be a nutritionally rich intracellular environment for P. gingivalis. The energy metabolism pathway from the preferred amino acids aspartate/asparagine showed a significant increase. Transcription and translation proteins also showed significant increases, consistent with energy not being limiting. The production of cytotoxic metabolic byproducts also appears to shift in internalized cells, reducing production of butyrate and increasing production of propionate. This may be simply a byproduct of metabolic shifts, or it may play a role in P. gingivalis adaptive response to internalization.

Methods

Proteomic methods

The bacterial and gingival cell culturing, sample preparation, proteome extraction, proteolytic digestion, HPLC pre-fractionation, 2-D capillary HPLC [31, 32], LTQ linear ion trap mass spectral data acquisition parameters, Sequest database searching [33], DTASelect [34]in silico assembly of the P. gingivalis proteome, protein relative abundance calculations, statistical methods and analytical validation for FDR and FNR [14] were all as published in the previous paper [9], with the following exceptions. The processing of the raw mass spectral data differs in this report due to the genome sequence annotation specific to strain ATCC 33277 [11], [GenBank: AP009380] which served as the basis for a new ORF database prepared by LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Gary Xie, private communication). The custom database prepared by LANL was combined with reversed sequences from P. gingivalis ATCC 33277, human and bovine proteins as with our W83 database [GenBank: AE015924] described previously. The total size of the combined fasta file was 116 Mbytes. The estimated random qualitative FDR for peptide identifications based on the decoy strategy [35, 36] was 3%.

Assignment of ORF numbers

Additional file 1: Table S1 is arranged in ascending order by PGN numbers assigned for the experimental strain used here by Naito et al. [11]. They have been cross referenced to the W83 PG numbers originally assigned both by TIGR-CMR and LANL, where it was possible to do so. Certain ATCC 33277 genes do not have a counterpart in the older annotations based on the W83 genome, and will thus be blank in the summary table for PG numbers.

DAVID

An overall list of detected proteins as well as lists of proteins that showed increased or decreased levels between internalized and gingival growth medium cultured cells were prepared using Entrez gene identifiers, as DAVID [17] does not recognize PGN numbers. Ontology analyses were then conducted using the DAVID functional annotation clustering feature with the default databases. Both increased and decreased protein level lists were analyzed using the overall list of detected proteins as the background. Potentially interesting clusters identified by DAVID were then examined manually.

Abbreviations

ATCC: 

American Type Culture Collection

DAVID: 

Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery

FDR: 

false discovery rate

FNR: 

false negative rate

GEC: 

gingival epithelial cell

LANL: 

Los Alamos National Laboratory

MS: 

Mass spectrometry

ORF: 

open reading frame

TIGR-CMR: 

The Institute for Genomic Research Comprehensive Microbial Resource, now part of the J. Craig Venter Institute.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Institute for Systems Biology for advice concerning the pathway analysis and LANL-ORALGEN for the machine readable fasta database. This work was supported by the NIH NIDCR under grants DE014372 and DE11111. Additional funding was provided by the UW Office of Research, College of Engineering and the Department of Chemical Engineering. We thank Fred Taub for the FileMaker database.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington
(2)
Department of Microbiology, University of Washington
(3)
Department of Oral Biology, University of Florida
(4)
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Chemistry

References

  1. Albandar JM: Epidemiology and risk factors of periodontal diseases. Dent Clin North Am. 2005, 49: 517-532. 10.1016/j.cden.2005.03.003. v-viPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Garcia RI, Henshaw MM, Krall EA: Relationship between periodontal disease and systemic health. Periodontol 2000. 2001, 25: 21-36. 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.22250103.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lamont RJ, Chan A, Belton CM, Izutsu KT, Vasel D, Weinberg A: Porphyromonas gingivalis invasion of gingival epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1995, 63: 3878-3885.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lamont RJ, Jenkinson HF: Life below the gum line: pathogenic mechanisms of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998, 62: 1244-1263.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Madianos PN, Papapanou PN, Nannmark U, Dahlen G, Sandros J: Porphyromonas gingivalis FDC381 multiplies and persists within human oral epithelial cells in vitro. Infect Immun. 1996, 64: 660-664.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Colombo AV, da Silva CM, Haffajee A, Colombo AP: Identification of intracellular oral species within human crevicular epithelial cells from subjects with chronic periodontitis by fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Periodontal Res. 2007, 42: 236-243. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00938.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Rudney JD, Chen R, Sedgewick GJ: Intracellular Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in buccal epithelial cells collected from human subjects. Infect Immun. 2001, 69: 2700-2707. 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2700-2707.2001.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Yilmaz O, Verbeke P, Lamont RJ, Ojcius DM: Intercellular spreading of Porphyromonas gingivalis infection in primary gingival epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2006, 74: 703-710. 10.1128/IAI.74.1.703-710.2006.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Xia Q, Wang T, Taub F, Park Y, Capestany CA, Lamont RJ, Hackett M: Quantitative proteomics of intracellular Porphyromonas gingivalis. Proteomics. 2007, 7: 4323-4337. 10.1002/pmic.200700543.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Nelson KE, Fleischmann RD, DeBoy RT, Paulsen IT, Fouts DE, Eisen JA, Daugherty SC, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Gwinn M, Haft DH, Kolonay JF, Nelson WC, Mason T, Tallon L, Gray J, Granger D, Tettelin H, Dong H, Galvin JL, Duncan MJ, Dewhirst FE, Fraser CM: Complete genome sequence of the oral pathogenic bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis strain W83. J Bacteriol. 2003, 18: 5591-5601. 10.1128/JB.185.18.5591-5601.2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Naito M, Hirakawa H, Yamashita A, Ohara N, Shoji M, Yukitake H, Nakayama K, Toh H, Yoshimura F, Kuhara S, Hattori M, Hayashi T, Nakayama K: Determination of the Genome Sequence of Porphyromonas gingivalis Strain ATCC 33277 and Genomic Comparison with Strain W83 Revealed Extensive Genome Rearrangements in P. gingivalis. DNA Res. 2008, 15: 215-225. 10.1093/dnares/dsn013.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hackett M: Science, marketing and wishful thinking in quantitative proteomics. Proteomics. 2008, 8: 4618-4623. 10.1002/pmic.200800358.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Takahashi N, Sato T, Yamada T: Metabolic pathways for cytotoxic end product formation from glutamate- and aspartate-containing peptides by Porpyromonas gingivalis. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 4704-4710. 10.1128/JB.182.17.4704-4710.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Xia Q, Hendrickson EL, Wang T, Lamont RJ, Leigh JA, Hackett M: Protein abundance ratios for global studies of prokaryotes. Proteomics. 2007, 7: 2904-2919. 10.1002/pmic.200700267.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Xia Q, Wang T, Park Y, Lamont RJ, Hackett M: Differential quantitative proteomics of Porphyromonas gingivalis by linear ion trap mass spectrometry: Non-label methods comparison, q-values and LOWESS curve fitting. Int J Mass Spec. 2007, 259: 105-116. 10.1016/j.ijms.2006.08.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lamont RJ, Yilmaz O: In or out: the invasiveness of oral bacteria. Periodontol 2000. 2002, 30: 61-69. 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.03006.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Tan Q, Kir J, Liu D, Bryant D, Guo Y, Stephens R, Baseler MW, Lane HC, Lempicki RA: DAVID Bioinformatics Resources: expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: W169-175. 10.1093/nar/gkm415.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendrickson EL, Lamont RJ, Hackett M: Tools for interpreting large-scale protein profiling in microbiology. J Dent Res. 2008, 87: 1004-1015. 10.1177/154405910808701113.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Niederman R, Zhang J, Kashket S: Short-chain carboxylic-acid-stimulated, PMN-mediated gingival inflammation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997, 8: 269-290. 10.1177/10454411970080030301.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mazumdar V, Snitkin ES, Amar S, Segrè D: Metabolic network model of a human oral pathogen. J Bacterio. 2009, 191: 74-90. 10.1128/JB.01123-08.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Matthews GM, Howarth GS, Butler RN: Short-Chain Fatty Acid Modulation of Apoptosis in the Kato III Human Gastric Carcinoma Cell Lines. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007, 6: 1051-1057.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Mao S, Park Y, Hasegawa Y, Tribble GD, James CE, Handfield M, Stavropoulos MF, Yilmaz O, Lamont RJ: Intrinsic apoptotic pathways of gingival epithelial cells modulated by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Cell Microbiol. 2007, 9: 1997-2007. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00931.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ang C, Veith PD, Dashper SG, Reynolds EC: Application of 16O/18O reverse proteolytic labeling to determine the effect of biofilm culture on the cell envelope proteome of Porphyromonas gingivalis W50. Proteomics. 2008, 8: 1645-1660. 10.1002/pmic.200700557.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosan B, Lamont RJ: Dental plaque formation. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2: 1599-1607. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01316-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ximenez-Fyvie LA, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS: Comparison of the microbiota of supra- and subgingival plaque in health and periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2000, 27: 648-657. 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027009648.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Ximenez-Fyvie LA, Feres M, Mager D: Ecological considerations in the treatment of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis periodontal infections. Periodontol 2000. 1999, 20: 341-362. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00165.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Kraakman LS, Griffioen G, Zerp S, Groeneveld P, Thevelein JM, Mager WH, Planta RJ: Growth-related expression of ribosomal protein genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1993, 239: 196-204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nomura M, Gourse R, Gaughman G: Regulation of the synthesis of ribosomes and ribosomal components. Annu Rev Biochem. 1984, 53: 75-117. 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.000451.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Hendrickson EL, Liu Yuchen, Rosas-Snadoval G, Porat I, Söll D, Whitman WB, Leigh JA: Global responses of Methanococcus maripaludis to specific nutrient limitations and growth rate. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 2198-2205. 10.1128/JB.01805-07.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Chen T, Hosogi Y, Nishikawa K, Abbey K, Fleischmann RD, Walling J, Duncan MJ: Comparative whole-genome analysis of virulent and avirulent strains of Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 5473-5479. 10.1128/JB.186.16.5473-5479.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR: Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat Biotechnol. 2001, 19: 242-247. 10.1038/85686.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Washburn MP, Ulaszek R, Deciu C, Schieltz DM, Yates R 3rd: Analysis of quantitative proteomic data generated via multidimensional protein identification technology. Anal Chem. 2002, 74: 1650-1657. 10.1021/ac015704l.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Eng JK, McCormack AL, Yates JR: An approach to correlate tandem mass-spectral data of peptides with amino-acid-sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrum. 1994, 5: 976-989. 10.1016/1044-0305(94)80016-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Tabb DL, McDonald WH, Yates JR: DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2002, 1: 21-26. 10.1021/pr015504q.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Peng J, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Licklider LJ, Gygi SP: Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J Proteome Res. 2003, 2: 43-50. 10.1021/pr025556v.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Elias JE, Gibbons FD, King OD, Roth FP, Gygi SP: Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra. Nat Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 214-219. 10.1038/nbt930.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hendrickson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.