Open Access

Population structure of Helicobacter pylori among ethnic groups in Malaysia: recent acquisition of the bacterium by the Malay population

  • Chin Yen Tay1,
  • Hazel Mitchell1,
  • Quanjiang Dong1,
  • Khean-Lee Goh2,
  • Ian W Dawes1 and
  • Ruiting Lan1Email author
BMC Microbiology20099:126

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-126

Received: 25 November 2008

Accepted: 19 June 2009

Published: 19 June 2009

Abstract

Background

Helicobacter pylori is a major gastric bacterial pathogen. This pathogen has been shown to follow the routes of human migration by their geographical origin and currently the global H. pylori population has been divided into six ancestral populations, three from Africa, two from Asia and one from Europe. Malaysia is made up of three major ethnic populations, Malay, Chinese and Indian, providing a good population for studying recent H. pylori migration and admixture.

Results

Seventy eight H. pylori isolates, including 27 Chinese, 35 Indian and 16 Malay isolates from Malaysia were analysed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of seven housekeeping genes and compared with the global MLST data. STRUCTURE analysis assigned the isolates to previously identified H. pylori ancestral populations, hpEastAsia, hpAsia2 and hpEurope, and revealed a new subpopulation, hspIndia, within hpAsia2. Statistical analysis allowed us to identify population segregation sites that divide the H. pylori populations and the subpopulations. The majority of Malay isolates were found to be grouped together with Indian isolates.

Conclusion

The majority of the Malay and Indian H. pylori isolates share the same origin while the Malaysian Chinese H. pylori is distinctive. The Malay population, known to have a low infection rate of H. pylori, was likely to be initially H. pylori free and gained the pathogen only recently from cross infection from other populations.

Background

Helicobacter pylori may have infected humans since their origin and currently is believed to infect more than half the population in the world [1, 2]. Infection is usually acquired during childhood by intrafamilial transmission and in the majority of cases infection is lifelong unless eradication by antibiotic treatment is undertaken [3, 4]. The prevalence of H. pylori infection ranges from 25% in developed countries to more than 80% in the developing regions [3, 5, 6]. H. pylori is commonly transmitted from mother to child [3].

H. pylori is well known for being highly diverse and recombining frequently. DNA sequence analysis of housekeeping and virulence associated genes all have illustrated the unusually high degree of genetic variability in this species [2, 712]. Comparison of isolates within a single host sampled over an average of 1.8 years has revealed that an average of ~100 DNA imports occur between bacteria, corresponding to 3% of the genome or 50 kb [11] and by extrapolation from these data, it was predicted that within 41 years half the genome would have been replaced by imports [11]. In comparison, 10–100 million years were needed to replace 60% of the E. coli genome [13].

Studies suggest that recombination is rare between isolates from different continents and as such H. pylori behaves like a genetic marker of human descent and reflects the human population in which the host spent his/her childhood [2, 10, 12]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of seven housekeeping genes from several hundred H. pylori strains isolated from different geographical, ethnic, and/or linguistic origins showed that H. pylori followed human migration out of Africa and identified six H. pylori populations which are designated as hpAfrica1, hpAfrica2, hpNEAfrica, hpEurope, hpEastAsia, and hpAsia2 [2, 12]. Three of these populations are further divided into subpopulations: hpEastAsia is divided into three subpopulations, hspEAsia, hspAmerind and hspMaori. The hspMaori subpopulation has been isolated exclusively from Maoris and other Polynesians and the hspAmerind from Inuits and Amerinds in North and South America; hpAfrica1 is divided into hspSAfrica and hspWAfrica; hpEurope is divided into Ancestral European 1 (AE1) and Ancestral European 2 (AE2).

Countries with populations of multiple origins provide a good opportunity to further study the population structure of H. pylori. Malaysia is composed of three major ethnic populations: Malay (65%), Chinese (26%) and Indian (7.7%) http://www.statistics.gov.my. The majority of Malaysian Chinese migrated from Southern China, the Malaysian Indians from Southern India and the Malays are in general considered natives of Malaysia [14]. The Malaysian Malay population is made up of a mixture of people extant in South East Asia as early as 3000 years ago [15]. However, in modern Malaysia they are now referred to as the Malays [16]. The aboriginal Orang Asli people in Malaysia do not share the same origin as the Malays [17].

H. pylori Infection is associated with an increased risk of developing peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer [18, 19] as well as an increased risk of developing primary non-Hodgkin's lymphomas of the stomach (MALT lymphoma) [20]. Previous studies have shown that the Indian ethnic group has the highest rate of H. pylori infection (68.9–75%), followed by the Chinese (45–60%) and the Malay the lowest (8–43%) [21, 22]. This difference of prevalence was also found in children [23]. Interestingly the three populations have different rates of gastric cancer. While the Malaysian Chinese population has a high incidence the Malaysian Indian population has a low incidence [24]. The phenomenon of high prevalence of H. pylori but low incidence of gastric cancer has been dubbed the "Indian Enigma" [24]. A better understanding of the population structure of H. pylori in these ethnic populations is clearly needed to order to elucidate the differences in infection rates and disease severity. We used MLST to analyse H. pylori isolates obtained from the three ethnic groups in Malaysia. We show the similarity between the Malay and the Indian H. pylori isolates and the diversity between the Malaysian Indian H. pylori population identified in this study and the Indian Ladakh H. pylori population identified by Linz et al. [2].

Results

Nucleotide diversity of the housekeeping genes

Fragments of seven housekeeping genes,atpA (566 bp), efp (350 bp), mutY (361 bp), ppa (338 bp), trpC (396 bp), ureI (525 bp), and yphC (450 bp), with a total length of 2,982 bp were sequenced from 78 Malaysian H. pylori isolates, including 27 Chinese, 16 Malay and 35 Indian isolates. MLST data of 423 isolates comprising of isolates from two studies by Achtman's group [2, 12] available at the time of analysis were extracted from the H. pylori MLST database http://pubmlst.org/helicobacter/ and included in the analysis with data from this study. The level of nucleotide diversity between populations and between genes is shown in Table 1. The most diverse gene was trpC in all except the Malaysian Chinese population with the highest diversity at nearly 7.6% while the least diverse gene was atpA at 2.6%. The three ethnic populations showed different levels of diversity with the Chinese population the lowest while the Indian and Malay populations were similar. All ethnic groups had lower level of variation than the global population as a whole.
Table 1

Sequence variation

Gene

Size (bp)

Diversity (%)

Population segregation sites

  

Chinese (27)

Indian (35)

Malay (16)

Global (492)

hspEAsia vs hspMaori

hspEAsia vs hspAmerind

hspIndia vs hspEAsia

hspIndia vs hspLadakh

atpA

566

1.77

1.61

2.22

2.62

5

4

5

4

efp

350

1.95

2.38

3.13

3.34

4

1

6

3

mutY

361

3.62

4.85

4.49

6.5

8

7

9

7

ppa

338

1.76

2.24

2.16

3.22

1

1

1

0

trpC

396

3.35

6.78

6.91

7.6

9

16

16

16

ureI

525

2.08

2.39

2.66

3.21

9

9

8

5

yphC

450

2.34

3.79

3.87

4.84

10

4

8

6

All seven

2,980

2.37

3.35

3.55

4.33

39

32

48

27

STRUCTURE analysis

To determine the relationship of the Malaysian H. pylori isolates and the global isolates, we analysed our MLST data together with the global data using the Bayesian statistics tool, STRUCTURE [25], which was previously used to divide global H. pylori isolates into six ancestral populations, designated as hpAfrica1, hpAfrica2, hpNEAfrica, hpEurope, hpEastAsia and hpAsia2 [2, 12]. The Malaysian H. pylori isolates were found to fall into four of the six known populations (Fig. 1A). Twenty three Indian and nine Malay isolates were grouped with hpAsia2; 26 Chinese, four Indian and two Malay isolates grouped with hpEastAsia; one Chinese, eight Indian and four Malay isolates grouped with hpEurope; and one Malay isolate grouped with hpAfrica1 (Fig. 1A). Phylogenetic analysis using the Neighbour joining algorithm as shown in Figure 1B divided the isolates into three clusters, consistent with the STRUCTURE analysis.
Figure 1

Population and phylogenetic structure of the Malaysian isolates. A) Ancestral populations and population assignment of the Malaysian isolates. The division into populations and subpopulations according to Falush et al. [12] and Linz et al. [2] with the new subpopulation identified in this study in bold. The number of isolates from this study falling into each subpopulation or population is shown in brackets. B) Neighbour joining tree of the Malaysian isolates.

Since some populations can be further divided into subpopulations (Fig. 1A) [2, 12], we used the same approach to further classify the Malaysian isolates into subpopulations. For the Malaysian isolates in the hpEastAsia population, the majority (26 Chinese, three Indian and one Malay) fell into hspEAsia except for two isolates (one Indian and one Malay) falling into the hspMaori subpopulation. hpAsia2 had previously no subpopulations. There were 77 isolates in hpAsia2 including 32 isolates from this study and 41 Ladakh isolates. Our STRUCTURE analysis divided these 77 isolates into two subpopulations (Fig. 2). All 41 Ladakh isolates were grouped as one subpopulation while the remaining 36 isolates including 32 Malaysian Indian and Malay isolates from this study, one Singapore isolate and three UK isolates (Bangladesh origin) grouped together as another (Fig. 2). Therefore we named the two subpopulations as hspLadakh and hspIndia respectively. For the 13 Malaysian isolates falling into hpEurope, three Indian and three Malay isolates belonged to AE1 while one Chinese, five Indian and one Malay isolate belonged to AE2.
Figure 2

Division of hpAsia2 into subpopulations by STRUCTURE analysis. The two subpopulations, hspLadakh (red) and hspIndia (green) and assignment of isolates were shown. Each horizontal bar represents an isolate with isolate names and population and/or ethnic origin shown on the right. All Malaysian isolates were from this study while other isolates from the global MLST data. Mosaic colours for an isolate indicate mixed population origin from respective populations of matching colour. Y-axis represents percentage of population assignment.

Identification of polymorphisms distinguishing the subpopulations

Based on above STRUCTURE analysis, we reasoned that there must be informative bases that support the division of the subpopulations. To identify these bases, we performed site-by-site pairwise comparisons between subpopulations using Fisher's exact test at a significance level of 0.05 with Dunn-Sidak correction for multiple site comparisons. We examined five subpopulations in four comparisons, hspLadakh versus hspIndia, hspEAsia versus hspIndia, hspEAsia versus hspMaori, and hspEAsia versus hspAmerind subpopulations. Out of the 413, 377, 362 and 377 informative sites in the four pairwise comparisons, 27, 48, 39 and 32 sites respectively support the population divisions and we define these sites as population segregation sites (PSSs) (Table 1 and Fig. 3). The gene containing the most PSSs was trpC which was also the most variable gene while the gene carrying the fewest number of PSSs was ppa with zero or one site. The sites supporting one subpopulation division may not support another population division.
Figure 3

Population segregation sites between hspIndia and hspLadakh. The overall consensus is shown at the top. Subpopulation consensus is shown above each subpopulation. Boxed sites shown are segments with at least two identical population segregation sites to the other population. Ladakh isolates (with names starting L) on the top panel and isolates from this study at the bottom panel. Genes and site positions were shown at top (reading vertically). ppa is not shown as it has no population segregation sites.

The patterns of the PSSs also provided further insight into recombination between populations. STRUCTURE analysis showed that in all subpopulations there were isolates with genes from other populations but the analysis did not identify which gene contributes to the mosaic genetic background. As shown in Figure 3 for hspIndia and hspLadakh comparison, the PSSs clearly showed the origin of some imported genes. Some involved the whole gene while others only involved segments of a gene. Many of these recombinational events must have occurred in the original population in India. The identification of the PSSs supports the results of STRUCTURE analysis which showed 8.9 to 33.2% imports and for the first time allowed us to identify the ancient alleles or sites in the populations concerned. The total number of PSSs between populations also reflects the distance between them. The more distantly related populations carry more segregating sites.

Isolates with identical alleles

H. pylori has been reported to be clonal only over a short period of time [11] and thus identical alleles among isolates is expected to be rare when sampling a large population. Interestingly, among the 78 Malaysian isolates analysed, 14 isolates had one or more identical alleles to other isolates. Two pairs of isolates, FD584i/FD589i, and FD419m/FD433m were identical in all seven genes; one pair of isolates, GC48i and FD566c, shared six identical genes; two pairs of isolates, FD539i and FD523i, and FD616i and FD540i share four identical genes; another two pairs of isolates, FD529c and FD519c, and FD556i and FD574i shared two identical genes and seven sets of isolates of 2–5 isolates shared one identical gene. Most of the identical genes were shared among the same ethnic population. However, we did observe that some genes were shared by different ethnic populations, most of which share only one identical gene. An Indian isolate (GC48i) shared six identical genes with a Chinese isolate (FD566c) and another Indian isolate (FD560i) had an identical gene with three Chinese isolates (FD586c, GC26c and GC52c).

We extended our analysis to include the 423 global isolate data to screen for identical genes that were shared globally. Fourteen pairs of isolates had all seven genes identical. There were 12, 6, 14, 15, 20, 35 sets with at least two isolates in each set sharing exclusively 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 identical alleles respectively. In a small number of cases a single isolate shared a subset of alleles with isolates that had a higher number of identical alleles these isolates were excluded. Isolates shared the most alleles in the efp gene and the least in ureI and yphC.

Discussion

Population Structure of H. pylori among Malaysian Populations

H. pylori has been shown to have migrated with its host out of Africa [2, 12] and population differentiation is seen clearly in different regions of the world. However no studies have looked at recent H. pylori migration histories. Malaysia has a history of human immigration divided into three major waves, the earliest human settlement by the Orang Asli people – the Malay aborigines, the migration of current Malays 3000 years ago, and the mid-nineteenth century migration of Chinese and Indians. There is no data on H. pylori infection in the Orang Asli people, but good studies of the other three major ethnic populations are available [22, 23, 26]. The H. pylori infection rate and disease severity are different among the three ethnic populations. This population mixture in Malaysia provided a good opportunity to determine the H. pylori population admixture and to enhance our understanding of differences in infection rate and disease severity. We have shown in this study that the isolates recovered from the Malaysian H. pylori population belong to three of the known H. pylori ancestral populations, hpEastAsia, hpAsia2 and hpEurope. The H. pylori isolates from the Chinese and Indian individuals were divided along their ethnic origins. Surprisingly the Malay isolates did not have a separate origin which is discussed below. There were six Indian isolates having Chinese H. pylori ancestry but none the reverse.

The population divisions identified in the current study are supported by the distribution of the cagA phosphorylation motif EPIYA [27] and vacA alleles [26] reported in these populations. The predominant EPIYA motif in the Malaysian Chinese population has been shown to be ABD (87.8%) while the predominant type in both the Malaysian Indian and the Malay populations is ABC with a frequency of 60.5% and 46.2% respectively. For vacA, the predominant genotype has been reported to be s1a among the Malaysian Malay (76.6%) and Indian populations (71.0%), and s1c among the Malaysian Chinese population (66.1%) [26]. Data from these two genes confirm our observation that the Malay H. pylori population is more similar to Indian than to Chinese population.

It has been suggested that the combined effect of high levels of recombination and diversity does not allow phylogenetic analysis of H. pylori isolates [2, 12] and also implies that one would not expect to find any identical alleles to be recovered from the population unless they are from related hosts. However for the first time, we uncovered isolates with identical alleles, ranging from one to seven alleles, within and between the three Malaysian populations. The available patient medical information showed that these isolates were not from related hosts. We also found isolates with up to seven identical alleles present in the global MLST data, which was not described previously. The recovery of isolates with identical alleles indicates that the frequency of recombination may be lower and hence clones may be more stable than previously thought. We suggest that isolates with even one identical allele are likely to be related by decent rather than recent recombination involving that gene. Thus it may be possible to determine relationships of isolates if more genes are sequenced.

The origin of Malay H. pylori

The Malay H. pylori population did not form a group of its own. The majority (nine of the 16 isolates studied) belong to the same group as the Indian isolates. Clearly the Malay isolates share the same origin as the Indian isolates. This conclusion has a number of implications for the origin of the Malay people and Malay H. pylori. Previous studies have shown that H. pylori follows the human route of migration and reflects human ancestry. However there is no evidence that ancestral Malays migrated from India. Currently there are two theories for the origins of Malay [28], one being of Southeast Asian origin, specifically sharing common ancestry with the Thais, the Laotians and the Cambodians while the other of Southern China origin through migration to Taiwan, then outwards to the Philippines, Borneo, Indonesia and Malaysia. The latter theory is supported by language origins while the former is supported by genetic evidence [28]. Neither supports Malays sharing direct common ancestry with Indians. Therefore for the Malay population, the ancestry of H. pylori does not reflect human ancestry as in other populations.

This raises the question as to what happened with the original Malay H. pylori since the human population undoubtedly carried the bacterium before migrating out of Africa. Studies showed that the H. pylori infection rate in the Malay population is much lower than that in the Indian population [22]. It is therefore likely that the Malay population was initially free of H. pylori and that the H. pylori in the current Malay population has only recently been acquired from the Malaysian Indian community. It is possible that the Malay population lost its original H. pylori [29]. However loss of H. pylori in modern populations is associated with improved living standards and this would be unlikely to be a plausible explanation for the initial loss of H. pylori in the Malay population.

While the Indian and Chinese populations have a small percentage of isolates from populations other than their ancestral populations (ie hspIndia and hspEAsia respectively), the Malay population has a much higher proportion of isolates (7 of the 16 isolates studied, 43.75%) from populations other than hspIndia (see discussion below). This adds support to the hypothesis that the Malay population was initially free from H. pylori and that these isolates were directly imported from other populations recently. The higher proportion of Malay isolates from the Indian population than from the Chinese population suggests that there has been greater direct interaction between the Malay and Indian populations than between the Malay and Chinese populations. Reduced interaction between the Malays and Chinese may relate to factors such as incompatibility in food sources (eg pork) [30] which may have partly constrained the transmission of H. pylori from the Chinese to the Malay population.

Another potential source of H. pylori for non-aboriginal Malays is the Orang Asli population, who originated from early human migration out of Africa. The Orang Asli is likely to have taken the "Southern Route" into South East Asia to reach Malaysia by traveling along the Indian Ocean Coast line 50–65,000 years ago [3133]. Therefore the Orang Asli H. pylori, if it exists, may share common ancestry with the Indian H. pylori, leading to the observed similarity of Malay isolates to Indian isolates. However given that other earlier H. pylori populations such as the Maori and American Indian populations can be readily identified [12], one would expect that the Orang Asli H. pylori population would be unique and identifiable after such a long period of separation, arguing against acquisition from Orang Asli population and in favour of acquisition from the Indian population.

Flow of H. pylori genes/genotypes among the Malaysian population and from other populations

Apart from the Malay population who appear to have gained the majority of its H. pylori isolates from the Indian population as discussed above, there was also gene flow from other populations. In particular the Indian and Malay populations have higher levels of inflow of genes. Thirteen of the 51 (25.5%) Malaysian Indian/Malay isolates were found grouped with the hpEurope population: six isolates grouped with AE1 and seven with AE2 (Additional file 1). One Malay isolate was found to be grouped with hpAfrica1, and one Indian and one Malay isolates grouped with hspMaori. The Malaysian Chinese population seems to have little inflow of genes from other populations with the exception of one Chinese isolate which grouped with AE2. The low frequency of Chinese isolates with other population affinity indicates that this isolate was more likely to have been acquired by its current or most recent host directly from an AE2 H. pylori host.

In contrast, the Indian/Malay isolates with ancestral European history (Table 2) are more likely to represent greater heterogeneity in the Indian/Malay H. pylori population and not direct transmission of isolates from the current European population or from early British or Portuguese colonization as these strains have genes from the Indian H. pylori gene pool. These isolates contain 8% to 40% hspIndia genes based on STRUCTURE analysis. By population segregation sites, 14 segments with at least two PSSs identical to the Indian/Malay population were identified (data not shown). Three isolates have one identical (PSSs) allele (FD542i in atpA, FD550i in mutY, FD540i in ureI). In contrast, the only Chinese isolate (FD493c) with a European ancestry showed almost no signal of Indian or Chinese ancestry. Such a diversity of isolates in the Malaysian population is interesting and warrants further studies.
Table 2

List of strains and population affinity based on STRUCTURE analysis

Strain ID

Disease

Ethnic origin

Population affinity (%)$

Population

subpopulation

FD418i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

81

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD423i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

72

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD430i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

78

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD434i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

96

hpEastAsia

hspMaori

FD483i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

84

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD509i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

77

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD511i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

75

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD517i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

78

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD520i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

83

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD524i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

54

hpEurope

AE2

FD528i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

77

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD532i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

46

hpEurope

AE1

FD533i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

71

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD535i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

88

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD539i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

62

hpEurope

AE1

FD540i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

67

hpEurope

AE2

FD541i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

81

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD542i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

40

hpEurope

AE1

FD543i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

86

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD546i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

81

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD550i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

48

hpEurope

AE2

FD556i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

82

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD560i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

90

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD563i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

54

hpEurope

AE2

FD572i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

97

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD574i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

82

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD575i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

86

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD584i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

85

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD585i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

71

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD604i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

88

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD607i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

84

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD608i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

83

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD616i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

50

hpEurope

AE2

FD619i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

79

hpAsia2

hspIndia

GC48i

Functional dyspepsia

Indian

95

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD452c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

91

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD493c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

63

hpEurope

AE2

FD506c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

97

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD507c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

96

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD513c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

86

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD519c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

89

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD529c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

97

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD536c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

95

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD537c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

92

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD566c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

95

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD568c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

93

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD576c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

98

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD577c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

85

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD586c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

93

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD595c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

83

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD599c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

94

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD605c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

93

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD613c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

95

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD618c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

90

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD622c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

83

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

GC17c

Gastric Cancer

Chinese

89

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

GC26c

Gastric Cancer

Chinese

92

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

GC29c

Functional dyspepsia

Chinese

95

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

GC32c

Gastric Cancer

Chinese

89

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

GC36c

Gastric Cancer

Chinese

88

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

GC51c

Gastric Cancer

Chinese

94

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

GC52c

Gastric Cancer

Chinese

95

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

FD419m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

56

hpEurope

AE1

FD433m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

57

hpEurope

AE1

FD477m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

73

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD527m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

88

hpEastAsia

hspMaori

FD544m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

59

hpEurope

AE1

FD559m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

69

hpAfrica1

unknown

FD589m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

86

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD662m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

86

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD703m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

83

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD710m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

83

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD711m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

73

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD719m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

75

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD725m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

82

hpAsia2

hspIndia

FD728m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

97

hpEastAsia

hspEAsia

GC008m

Functional dyspepsia

Malay

53

hpEurope

AE2

GC014m

Gastric Cancer

Malay

89

hpAsia2

hspIndia

$ Denotes % genes allocated to the given population by STRUCTURE analysis

There are two other possible sources of genetic heterogeneity in the Indian H. pylori: century-old importation and earlier common ancestry. While the colonisation of India from as early as the fifteenth century by the Portuguese and later by the British Empire [34] may have contributed directly to the Indian H. pylori gene pool from the European population. This explanation does not reconcile well with the observation by Wirth et al. [35] that in the Ladakh population genes of European ancestry were found despite the population being in a more pristine region. It has previously been suggested that AE1 originated in Central Asia because it shares phylogenetic signals with isolates from Estonia, Finland and Ladakh [12, 36]. Since the ancestors of Malaysian Indians and the Ladakhis resided in the same region and their H. pylori belong to hpAsia2, it seems likely that this biased share of the gene pool by the Malaysian Indian/Malay isolates with the AE1 subpopulation is due to an earlier common ancestry. Our findings are consistent with the studies of Wirth et al. [35], Linz et al. [2] and Devi et al. [19] that H. pylori in the Indian population is more heterogeneous in origin, reflecting perhaps both earlier common ancestry and recent imports.

Division of hpAsia2 into subpopulations

The hpAsia2 population was initially defined based on isolates from Ladakh in Northern India, which represents the west/middle Asia population. Since the Malaysian Indian population is known to have originated from India, the Malaysian Indian isolates were initially not expected to be distinguishable from the Ladakh population. However, we have shown that the two populations can be divided within hpAsia2 as subpopulations, hspLadakh and hspIndia (Fig. 2). A total of 27 (or 0.91%) segregating sites among the seven housekeeping genes were identified to separate the two subpopulations. There is however considerable gene flow between the two populations. Identical alleles as defined by the PSSs can be treated as recombination that occurred in the more distant past. These alleles are present in three genes (atpA, efp and ureI). Further many segments with at least two identical PSSs are present in three other genes (mutY, trpC and yphC; Fig. 3). Note that ppa has no PSSs. These results suggest that there is considerable population admixture in the earlier history of the Indian population. A recent study of the Indian population sequenced 23 isolates by MLST but the sequences are shorter [19]. STRUCTURE analysis of combined data from our Malaysian Indian isolates, Ladakh isolates and these 23 Indian isolates using k = 2 populations and found that the Malaysian Indian isolates grouped together with the Indian isolates while the Ladakh isolates were separate. However, when k = 3 populations were used, the two sets of Indian isolates were separated (data not shown). This suggests that the two Indian populations overlap but are distinctive. The Malaysian Indian H. pylori population may have differentiated further from the Indian H. pylori population from India, although it is also possible that the difference between the two H. pylori populations reflects regional differences in India as the Malaysian Indians mainly came from South India.

Conclusion

This study has shown that the Malaysian H. pylori isolates can be differentiated into three populations using MLST, being hpEastAsia, hpAsia2 and hpEurope. Interestingly the Malay population was shown to carry H. pylori isolates of Indian origin. The infection rate of H. pylori among the Malay population is low in comparison to the Malaysian Indian population [22]. In western countries a low or reduced rate of H. pylori infection is attributed to high or improved hygiene standard [3]. However this factor does not account for differences between the Malay and the other two populations [21, 22]. Therefore the Malay population was likely to be initially H. pylori-free and has acquired H. pylori only recently from the Indian population. Thus the low H. pylori infection rate in the Malay population may be due to low cross infection rate from another population.

The Malaysian Indian/Malay isolates were found to differ from the Ladakh isolates from India and in fact formed a new subpopulation, hspIndia. Clearly there are more subpopulations of H. pylori and populations can be divided at a finer scale when more isolates are used or more geographical regions are sampled. More extensive worldwide surveys will help us further understand the evolution and population structure of H. pylori, an organism that has impacted more than half of the world's population and continues to pose great risk to human health because of its association with gastric cancer and MALT lymphoma. Genetic heterogeneity of the bacterium within a host population as shown in this study should be taken into account when studying the epidemiology and pathogenesis of H. pylori since there is clearly variation in incidence and severity of the disease in different populations.

Methods

Source of gastric biopsies and culture of H. pylori isolates

Gastric biopsies were collected as part of a large-scale gastric cancer study conducted in symptomatic patients undergoing gastroenterological examination at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. All biopsies were obtained with the informed consent of the patients and this study was approved by the Human Ethics Committees of the University of New South Wales and the University of Malaya. Based on endoscopic and histological examinations, patients were diagnosed as having gastric cancer or functional dyspepsia. All except seven samples were from patients with functional dyspepsia as shown in Table 2.

H. pylori was cultured by inoculating biopsies on Campylobacter selective agar (CSA) containing 4% blood base agar No. 2 (Oxoid), defibrinated horse blood (Oxoid), and one vial of Skirrow's supplement (Oxoid) containing 2.5 mg Trimethoprim, 5.0 mg Vancomycin, and 1250 IU polymyxin B. Primary cultures were incubated at 37°C with 10% CO2 in a CO2 incubator (Plymouth, USA) for up to 10 days, observing daily for growth. For isolation of pure cultures a single colony was picked and subcultured onto CSA for four days. Identification of H. pylori was based on microscopic morphology and biochemical testing (urease, oxidase and catalase). One isolate from each biopsy was selected for this study and 78 isolates were obtained from patients of different ethnic background, including 27 Chinese, 35 Indian and 16 Malay (Table 2). We used all Malay biopsy samples available. Despite the fact that this study spanned a period of four years the number of Malay subjects from whom H. pylori could be cultured was low which reflects the relative low prevalence in this population. Isolates from this study are available to researchers upon request to HM.

Chromosomal DNA purification

One plateful of bacterial culture was collected and suspended into 215 μl of Tris (50 mM), 15 μl of EDTA (0.5 M) and incubated for 10 min. Two μl of proteinase K (10 mg/ml) and 20 μl of SDS (10%) were added followed by incubation at 50°C for a minimum of 2 h or until clear. One μl of RNase (10 mg/ml) was added and incubated at 65°C for an additional 20 min. the mixture was then transferred into a 1.5 ml Heavy Gel Phase tube (Eppendorf) and washed twice with one volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and once with one volume of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1). The top layer was transferred into a new 1.5 ml tube containing 600 μl of pre-chilled EtOH (100%). Precipitated DNA was then spooled out, washed in 70% (v/v) EtOH, dissolved in 100 μl TE buffer (10 mM Tris 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and incubated at 65°C for 15 min to evaporate the residual ethanol.

PCR assay and DNA sequencing

The primer sequences for MLST of the seven house keeping genes used in this study were those described by Achtman et al. [10]. Primers were synthesized commercially (Sigma-Aldrich). Each PCR reaction included 2.0 μl DNA template (approx. 20 ng), 0.5 μl (30 pmol/μl) of each forward and reverse primer, 0.5 μl of dNTP (10 mM), 5 μl of 10 × PCR buffer (500 mM KCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.0, 1% Triton X-100 and 15 mM MgCl2), 0.25 μl of Taq polymerase (1.25 U) and MilliQ water to a total volume of 50 μl. PCR cycles were performed in a Hybaid PCR Sprint Thermocycler (Hybaid): initial DNA denaturation for 2 min at 94°C, followed by DNA denaturation for 15 sec at 94°C, primer annealing for 30 sec at 50°C, and polymerization for 90 sec at 72°C for 35 cycles, with a final extension of 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were verified on ethidium bromide stained agarose gels. PCR product for sequencing was purified using sodium acetate/ethanol precipitation. The 20-μl PCR sequencing mixture contained 1 μl of BigDye (version 3.1; Applied Biosystems), 20 ng of the purified PCR product, 3.5 μl of 5× PCR sequencing buffer (Applied Biosystems), 1 μl of forward primer (concentration, 3.2 pmol/μl; Sigma-Aldrich), and MilliQ water. Unincorporated dye was removed by ethanol precipitation. The sequencing reaction mixtures were resolved on an ABI 3730 automated DNA sequence analyzer (Applied Biosystems) at the sequencing facility of the School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Bioinformatic analysis

PHRED PHRAP and CONSED [37] program package, accessed through the Australia National Genomic Information Service, was used for sequence editing. PILEUP from the Genetics Computer Group package [38], and MULTICOMP [39], were used for multiple sequence alignment and comparison. PHYLIP [40] was used to generate phylogenetic trees. STRUCTURE version 2.2 [25], which implements a Bayesian approach for deducing population structure from multilocus data, was used to analyse the population clustering of an isolate, assuming that each isolate has derived all of its ancestry from only one population. The number of populations, K, was determined under the "no admixture" model and in each simulation run, the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation of 30,000 iterations approximated the posterior probability of K, following a burn-in of 10,000 iterations. After multiple runs on each K assumed, the value that generated the highest posterior probability was used as the number of possible populations. The assignment of an isolate to a particular population was done under the linkage model.

Segregation site Analysis

Gene sequences from two populations were aligned and compiled by PILEUP and MULTICOMP. Informative sites, which are defined as those with at least two variants at a particular site and more than one isolate for each base variant, were extracted from output generated by MULTICOMP and examined using Microsoft EXCEL. Total base changes at each informative site present in each population were summed and formed a 2 × 2 table for Fisher's Exact test using SPSS (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). For those informative sites that have more than two variants, the least frequent base was removed and treated as a missing value. The probability of each site generated by SPSS was adjusted using Dunn-Sidak correction: α' = 1 - (1 - α)1/p, where α' represent adjusted probability, α represent the significance value (0.05 used in this study) and p represent the total number of comparisons.

The GenBank accession numbers for the sequences reported in this study are FJ846683 – FJ847228.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a University of New South Wales Goldstar award and the Cancer Council of New South Wales. We thank Heather Schmidt for providing some of the DNA samples and we thank the referees for helpful suggestions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales
(2)
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaysia

References

  1. Covacci A, Telford JL, Giudice GD, Parsonnet J, Rappuoli R: Helicobacter pylori virulence and genetic geography. Science. 1999, 284: 1328-1333.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Linz B, Balloux F, Moodley Y, Manica A, Liu H, Roumagnac P, Falush D, Stamer C, Prugnolle F, Merwe van der SW, Yamaoka Y, Graham DY, Perez-Trallero E, Wadstrom T, Suerbaum S, Achtman M: An African origin for the intimate association between humans and Helicobacter pylori. Nature. 2007, 445: 915-918.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Mitchell HM: The epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroduodenal disease and Helicobacter pylori: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Edited by: Nedrud JG, Westblom U, Czinn S. 1998, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 11-30.Google Scholar
  4. Kuipers EJ, Israel DA, Kusters JG, Gerrits MM, Weel J, Ende van der A, Hulst van der RWM, Wirth HP, Höök-Nikanne JH, Thompson SA, et al.: Quasispecies development of Helicobacter pylori observed in paired Isolates obtained years apart from the same host. J Infect Dis. 2000, 181: 273-282.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Pounder RR: The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in different countries. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995, 9: 33-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Parsonnet JE: The incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995, 9: 45-52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Garner JA, TL C: Analysis of genetic diversity in cytotoxin-producing and non-cytotoxin-producing Helicobacter pylori strains. J Infect Dis. 1995, 172: 290-293.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ende van der A, Pan Z-J, Bart A, Hulst van der RWM, Feller M, Xiao S-D, Tytgat GNJ, Dankert J: cagA-Positive Helicobacter pylori Populations in China and The Netherlands Are Distinct. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 1822-1826.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kansau I, Raymond J, Bingen E, Courcoux P, Kalach N, Bergeret M, Braimi N, Dupont C, A L: Genotyping of Helicobacter pylori isolates by sequencing of PCR products and comparison with the RAPD technique. Res Microbiol. 1996, 147: 661-669.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Achtman M, Azuma T, Berg DE, Ito Y, Morelli G, Pan Z-J, Suerbaum S, Thompson SA, Ende van der A, van Doorn L-J: Recombination and clonal groupings within Helicobacter pylori from different geographical regions. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 32: 459-470.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Falush D, Kraft C, Taylor NS, Correa P, Fox JG, Achtman M, Suerbaum S: Recombination and mutation during long-term gastric colonization by Helicobacter pylori: estimates of clock rates, recombination size, and minimal age. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 15056-15061.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Falush D, Wirth T, Linz B, Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Kidd M, Blaser MJ, Graham DY, Vacher S, Perez-Perez GI, et al.: Traces of human migrations in Helicobacter pylori populations. Science. 2003, 299: 1582-1585.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawrence JG, H O: Amelioration of bacterial genomes: rates of change and exchange. J Mol Evol. 1997, 44: 383-397.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Vlieland CA: The Population of the Malay Peninsula: A Study in Human Migration. Geogr Rev. 1934, 24: 61-78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Andaya LY: The search for the 'origins' of Melayu. J Southeast Asian Stud. 2001, 32: 315-330.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirschman C: The meaning and measurement of Ethnicity in Malaysia: an analysis of census classifications. J Asian Stud. 1987, 46: 555-582.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hill C, Soares P, Mormina M, Macaulay V, Meehan W, Blackburn J, Clarke D, Raja JM, Ismail P, Bulbeck D, Oppenheimer S, Richards M: Phylogeography and ethnogenesis of aboriginal Southeast Asians. Mol Biol Evol. 2006, 23: 2480-2491.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Blaser MJ: Science, medicine, and the future – Helicobacter pylori and gastric diseases. Br Med J. 1998, 316: 1507-1510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Devi SM, Ahmed I, Francalacci P, Hussain MA, Akhter Y, Alvi A, Sechi LA, Megraud F, Ahmed N: Ancestral European roots of Helicobacter pylori in India. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 184-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Parsonnet J: Helicobacter pylori – the size of the problem. Gut. 1998, 43: S6-S9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Goh KL, Parasakthi N: The racial cohort phenomenon: seroepidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in a multiracial South-East Asian country. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001, 13: 177-183.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaur G, Naing NN: Prevalence and ethnic distribution of Helicobacter pylori infection among endoscoped patients in north eastern peninsular Malaysia. Malaysian J Med Sci. 2003, 10: 66-70.Google Scholar
  23. Boey CC, Goh KL, Lee WS, Parasakthi N: Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Malaysian children: evidence for ethnic differences in childhood. J Paediatr Child Health. 1999, 35: 151-152.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Goh KL, Cheah PL, Md N, Quek KF, Parasakthi N: Ethnicity and Helicobacter pylori as risk factors for gastric cancer in Malaysia: A prospective case control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007, 102: 40-45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P: Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000, 155: 945-959.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tan HJ, Rizal AM, Rosmadi MY, Goh KL: Distribution of Helicobacter pylori cagA, cagE and vacA in different ethnic groups in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005, 20: 589-594.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Schmidt H-MA, Goh KL, Fock KM, Hilmi I, Dhamodaran S, Forman D, Mitchell H: Distinct cagA EPIYA motifs are associated with ethnic diversity in Malaysia and Singapore. Helicobacter. 2009,Google Scholar
  28. Ainoon O, Yu YH, Amir Muhriz AL, Boo NY, Cheong SK, Hamidah NH: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) variants in Malaysian Malays. Hum Mutat. 2003, 21: 101-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Graham DY, Yamaoka Y, Malaty HM: Thoughts about populations with unexpected low prevalences of Helicobacter pylori infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 101: 849-851.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kiong TC: The Chinese in contemporary Malaysia. Race, Ethnicity, and the State in Malaysia and singapore. Edited by: Fee LK. 1996, Leiden: Koninlijke Brill NV, 95-119.Google Scholar
  31. Atkinson QD, Gray RD, Drummond AJ: mtDNA variation predicts population size in humans and reveals a major southern Asian chapter in human prehistory. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25: 468-474.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Forster P, Matsumura S: Did Early Humans Go North or South?. Science. 2005, 308: 965-966.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Macaulay V, Hill C, Achilli A, Rengo C, Clarke D, Meehan W, Blackburn J, Semino O, Scozzari R, Cruciani F, Taha A, Shaari NK, Raja JM, Ismail P, Zainuddin Z, Goodwin W, Bulbeck D, Bandelt H-J, Oppenheimer S, Torroni A, Richards M: Single, Rapid Coastal Settlement of Asia Revealed by Analysis of Complete Mitochondrial Genomes. Science. 2005, 308: 1034-1036.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wolpert S: A New History of India. 2003, New York: Oxford University Press, 7Google Scholar
  35. Wirth T, Wang X, Linz B, Novick RP, Lum JK, Blaser M, Morelli G, Falush D, Achtman M, Salzano FM: Distinguishing Human Ethnic Groups by Means of Sequences from Helicobacter pylori: Lessons from Ladakh. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 4746-4751.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Suerbaum S, Achtman M: Helicobacter pylori: recombination, population structure and human migrations. Int J Med Microbiol. 2004, 294: 133-139.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P: CONSED – A graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998, 8: 195-202.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Dolz R: GCG. Computer Analysis Of Sequence Data, Methods In Molecular Biology. Edited by: Griffin AM, Griffin HG. 1994, Totpwa, NJ: Humana, 9-17.Google Scholar
  39. Reeves PR, Farnell L, Lan R: MULTICOMP: a program for preparing sequence data for phylogenetic analysis. Bioinformatics. 1994, 10: 281-284.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Felsenstein J: PHYLIP-phylogeny inference package. Cladistics. 1989, 5: 164-166.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Tay et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement