L-alanine-induced germination in Bacillus licheniformis -the impact of native gerA sequences
© Madslien et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 28 January 2014
Accepted: 9 April 2014
Published: 22 April 2014
L-alanine, acting through the GerA receptor, was recently found to be an efficient germinant in Bacillus licheniformis ATCC14580/DSM13.
In this study, we show that several of 46 examined B. licheniformis strains germinate remarkably slower than the type strain when exposed to L-alanine. These strains are not necessarily closely related, as determined by MLST (multi-locus sequence typing). Three of the slow-germinating strains were further examined in order to see whether nucleotide substitutions in the gerA sequences were responsible for the slow L-alanine germination. This was performed by complementing the transformable type strain derivate MW3ΔgerAA with gerA variants from the three slow-germinating strains; NVH1032, NVH1112 and NVH800.
A wide selection of B. licheniformis strains was evaluated for L-alanine-induced germination efficiency. Our results show that gerA substitutions could only partially explain why spores of some B. licheniformis strains responded slower than others in the presence of L-alanine.
Spores of Bacillus licheniformis and other Bacillus species are frequent contaminants in foods[1, 2]. Exposure to nutrients triggers spores to leave dormancy in the process of germination[3–5]. This process involves several steps leading to rehydration of the spore core and loss of dormancy. Under favorable conditions, spores will grow out and multiply to numbers that can cause food spoilage and sometimes disease. While dormant spores are extremely heat resistant, germinated spores can easily be killed by a mild heat treatment. Therefore, a food preservation technique applied by food manufacturers to reduce spore numbers in food products is “induced germination”. The consequence of induced germination is spores germinated into vegetative cells will be heat sensitive and can therefore be inactivated, by successive heating below temperatures that compromise food quality (modified Tyndallization)[8–10]. The effectiveness of such a strategy depends on the germination rate of the spore population. A slow and/or heterogeneous germination rate of a specific spore population will reduce the effectiveness of such treatments[11–14].
Nutrient germinant receptors (GRs), localized to the inner spore membrane[15–17], are involved in the spore’s recognition of specific nutrients in its environment, which is the initial step in the spore’s return to growth. Binding of nutrient to the receptors is believed to trigger the release of the spore core’s large depot of Ca-dipicolinic acid (CaDPA), followed by rehydration of the spore core and degradation of the spore cortex. Current knowledge about GRs and their nutrient specificity is mainly achieved from Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus. However, genes encoding GRs are widely distributed among Bacillus and Clostridium species[5, 19], implicating an essential role in triggering of spore germination in most spore-forming bacteria. Interestingly, the nutrient specificity of the receptors and the interaction between them varies between and even within species, as has been shown for B. cereus-group members[20–22].
GRs are generally encoded by polycistronic operons that are expressed late in sporulation under the regulation of the forespore-specific transcription factor, sigma G (σG)[23, 24]. These genes constitute a family (gerA family) of homologous genes that probably have evolved from the same ancestor[4, 19]. Three putative gerA family operons, gerA (A, B, C), gerK (A, C, B) and ynd (D,E 3 E 2 , F 1, E 1 ) and the single gerAC homologue yndF2 have been identified within the B. licheniformis type strain ATCC14580/DSM13 genome[25–27]. Of these, only the gerA operon has been functionally characterized so far. gerA was found to be essential for germination in presence of L-alanine. A similar role has been described for gerA in B. subtilis. L-alanine is probably the most universal single nutrient germinant among spore formers.
The Bacillus GRs which have been described so far are usually composed of three subunits termed A, B and C. The A and B subunits are predicted to contain 5–6 (A) and 10–11 (B) membrane-spanning domains, respectively[5, 29], while the C subunit is thought to be a membrane-anchored lipoprotein. The tertiary structure of B. subtilis GerBC was determined a few years ago. The B-subunit, whose amino acid sequence shows homology to proteins of the APC (amino acid-polyamine-organocation) superfamily, is proposed to be the most likely site of ligand binding, as mutations within this subunit alter ligand specificity[4, 32]. However, since mutations in any of the three cistrons are shown to disturb receptor function, the exact site of nutrient binding is still unknown.
The genetic relationship of 53 strains of the food-spoilage agent B. licheniformis, a close relative of B. subtilis, was recently described by a novel MLST scheme. One of these strains, NVH1032, was isolated after surviving an “induced germination”-regime (Tyndallization), applied by the food industry to eliminate spore contamination. Preliminary results in our lab suggested that NVH1032 and other B. licheniformis strains germinate considerably slower than the type strain when exposed to L-alanine. Such slow-germinating strains pose a challenge to food manufacturers that want to implement “induced germination” as a strategy to reduce/eliminate spores during processing.
In this study, 46 of the 53 genotyped strains were screened for efficiency of L-alanine-induced germination, and the correlation between the genotype and the induced germination was determined. Furthermore, it was investigated whether the slow germination of three particular B. licheniformis strains was due to sequence differences in the gerA operon.
Results and discussion
Screening of L-alanine-induced germination in B. licheniformis strains
In order to evaluate the efficiency of L-alanine-induced germination of the 46 B. licheniformis strains, the level of germination was recorded after addition of L-alanine in a screening assay. The results showed that germination efficiency, determined by reduction of absorbance (A600) varied from ~1 to 60% between the tested strains 2 h after the addition of germinant (Additional file1). A drop in A600 of 60% was equivalent to > 95% germinated spores, as verified by phase contrast microscopy. About 30 of the strains germinated well with a reduction in absorbance of 40% or more, while six strains germinated poorly (10% or less in reduction of absorbance).
In general, differences in germination between strains may be due to differences in lag time (interval between addition of germinant and loss of refractivity) and differences in rate of germination (slope of the germination curve/∆A600 min-1). Several factors may account for these differences: (i) permeability of the outer spore layers, restricting access of germinant to the inner membrane, (ii) germinant specificity[20, 22], (iii) GR (nutrient germinant receptors) level, (iv) dysfunctional GRs, (v) GR synergism/antagonism and/or (vi) structure of the cortex. Within single populations of B. subtilis, a reduced level of GRs has been suggested to be one of the main reasons for slow germination or “superdormancy”, probably by increasing the lag time until CaDPA is released. In B. subtilis, GRs have been proposed to be present in a relatively low number (<40) in the spore’s inner membrane where they form discrete clusters, so-called germinosomes[16, 39], however, it has recently been reported that this number may be highly underestimated. The number of germination receptors has been shown to be strongly dependent on the sporulation conditions[4, 41, 42]. In this study, sporulation and germination conditions (e.g. temperature, sporulation medium, pH, activation time/temperature, germinant concentration) were optimized with respect to the type strain ATCC14580/DSM13. However, these conditions may not be optimal for all strains.
Distribution and characterization of the gerA operon
A total of seven unique alleles were distributed into four main clusters, determined “1a”, “1b”, “1c” and “2” (Figure 1). Cluster “2” was represented by only three strains, NVH1032, NVH800 and NVH1112, that all showed a slower and less efficient germination response (Additional file1) compared to the type strain, ATCC14580/DSM13 (cluster “1b”). However, slow-germinating strains were also found within each of the other clusters. Thus, this part of the gerA operon sequence (718 bp ranging from 3′ end of gerAB to 5′ end of gerAC) was not suitable in order to completely distinguish slow-germinating and fast-germinating strains.
Germination of gerA complementation strains
An important observation was that, in contrast to Løvdal et al. 2012, L-alanine-induced germination was not completely abolished in MW3∆gerAA (NVH1307). This weak germination (~10% phase dark spores after 120 min) was not observed in absence of germinant, indicating that germination receptors other than GerA might be weakly activated by L-alanine. We also noted that spores of the slow-germinating strain NVH1112 hardly germinated at all, and to a lesser extent than MW3∆gerAA (Figure 2a,b). When complementing MW3∆gerAA with the gerA operon from NVH1112 (NVH1321) germination efficiency increased, indicating that the gerA operon of NVH1112 has some functionality in presence of L-alanine. A faster and more efficient germination of the complementation mutants compared to their respectively gerA originating strains was also observed for NVH1322 (gerA from NVH800) and NVH 1309 (gerA from NVH1032).
Secondly, since the complementing gerA genes in this experiment were plasmid-born (pHT315 encoding erythromycin resistance), 1 μg ml-1 erythromycin was used in the sporulation medium to maintain the plasmid throughout the sporulation process and MW3 carrying the pHT315 empty vector germinated slower and with less efficiency than the wild-type MW3 strain (Additional file2). Despite this observation, MW3∆gerAA complemented with slow germinating gerA sequences germinated better than the strains from where the gerA sequences originated (Figure 2a-d).
Thirdly, the entire gerA operon and the 151 bp region upstream of the start codon of gerAA was cloned in the complementing vector pHT315. Alignments of the promoter sequence of strain NVH1032, NVH800, NVH1112 and ATCC14580/MW3 can be viewed in Additional file3. No differences were observed between the type-strain and the slow germinating strains in the -10 and -35 promoter region of gerA. However, differences outside these regions may influence the transcriptional level. pHT315 contains the inducible lac promoter, but transcription from this promoter cannot be excluded even without induction.
Despite the imperfect restoration of the wt phenotypes, the results of the germination assays in this study indicate that the gerA sequences have an impact on germination rate and efficiency. Differences in the GerA amino acid sequence may lead to altered protein 3-D structure, which again may cause impaired assembly and stability of the receptor complex in the inner membrane, lower or higher substrate affinity or influence the interactions with other membrane proteins.
Structural analysis of amino acid substitutions in the GerA receptor
Analyses of single amino acid substitutions have previously been conducted in B. subtilis GerAA, GerAB and GerBC. None of these positions were substituted in the GerA sequences examined in the present study. Alignments of the GerAA, GerAB and GerAC sequences of B. licheniformis NVH1032, NVH800, NVH1112 and ATCC14580/DSM13 are presented in Additional files4,5 and6. Thus, on the basis of this knowledge and the lack of a 3D structure of any proteins in the GerAA and GerAB families of proteins, the relevance of the observed differences within these two subunits is difficult to determine. However, the crystal structure of B. subtilis GerBC has recently been determined. Using this structure as a template for prediction of B. licheniformis GerAC structures, one of the perhaps most interesting substitutions is F342S (NVH1032 and NVH800) which lies in the so-called “region 2” of domain III (Additional file7). Region 2 is reported to be a well conserved region in GerBC among Bacillales and substitutions within this region were previously shown to affect receptor function in B. subtilis. On the other hand, the F342S substitution was neither observed in the gerA sequences of the slowest germinating strain NVH1112 or the fastest germinating strain ATCC14580/DSM13 suggesting that the role of this site seems unclear. It should be mentioned that the aa sequence of the GerAC protein of NVH1112 is much closer to that of MW3 than the other two (Additional file6), indicating that GerAC is not crucial to germination efficiency. Ultimately, the lack of information about the exact germinant binding site, as well as the fact that only the C subunit has been structurally characterized, makes it difficult to interpret the effect of single substitutions on the GerA receptor function.
This study shows that spores of 46 B. licheniformis strains are able to germinate in the presence of L-alanine, but that the germination rate and efficiency differ significantly between the strains. About 10% of the strains germinated poorly, even in presence of high (100 mM) concentrations of probably the most universal and potent germinant for Bacillus species in general, and B. licheniformis in particular. Germination rate of different bacterial strains are of importance to the food industry, using so-called “induced germination”, eg Tyndallization, to decrease spore contamination in processed foods. Delayed germination may reduce the efficiency of Tyndallization by allowing ungerminated spores to survive. Our results demonstrate that nutrient-induced germination followed by inactivation can be challenging when dealing with specific B. licheniformis strains.
The germination phenotype was partly restored when complementing a gerAA disruption mutant with gerA operons from either slow- or fast-germinating B. licheniformis strains. This observation indicates that differences in gerA family operons are partly responsible for differences in germination efficiency of B. licheniformis in response to L-alanine.
Strains used in this study
B. licheniformis DSM13 (ΔhsdR1,ΔhsdR2)
B. licheniformis MW3ΔgerAA::spc. SpR
NVH1307 with pHT315_MW3gerA. SpR and ErmR
NVH1307 with pHT315_ NVH1032gerA. SpR and ErmR
NVH1307 with pHT315_ NVH1112gerA. SpR and ErmR
NVH1307 with pHT315_ NVH800gerA. SpR and ErmR
53 B. licheniformis strains
Genotyped wt strains from various sources
MW3 ∆gerAA (NVH1307) and the complementation mutant NVH1311 are described in Løvdal et al. 2012. The complementation mutants NVH1309, NVH1321 and NVH1322 were constructed in this work as described later on.
Bacteria were grown on sheep blood agar at 30°C overnight. Single colony material was inoculated in 20 mL Luria broth (LB). The bacterial culture was grown overnight at 30°C and centrifuged at 3000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet resuspended in 1 mL enzymatic lysis buffer (20 mM Tris · Cl, pH 8.0, 20 mM Tris · Cl, pH 8.0, 1.2% Triton® X-100, 20 mg mL-1 lysozyme (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany)). Further DNA extraction was performed according to the protocol provided by DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, USA).
PCR and sequencing of the gerA operon
Primers used in this study
5′- GGATTTGGGATACCGCTCTT -3′
5′- TGCAGATGCTGCGAGAATAC -3′
5′- CCCTGTTCCTATCGGCGTTT -3′
RT-PCR (E = 2.01)
5′- TCGGCAGCATGCCTTGA -3′
RT-PCR (E = 2.01)
5′- CGCCGTTCCCACAGATTC –3′
RT-PCR (E = 2.01/1.98/1.95)
5′- CAGCGCTGAAGAAACCTTGTC –3′
RT-PCR (E = 2.01/1.98/1.95)
5′- ACCTCTTCTTATCAGTGGTTTCTTGAT -3′
RT-PCR (E = 2.00)
5′- CCTCAATTGGCGATATGTCTTG -3′
RT-PCR (E = 2.00)
The Staden Package was used for alignment, editing and construction of consensus sequences based on the ABI sequence chromatograms. Consensus sequences (626 bp) were entered into the MEGA5 software and aligned by CLUSTALW. Dendograms were constructed in MEGA5 using the Neighbor-Joining method (NJ) with branch lengths estimated by the Maximum Composite Likelihood method. Branch quality was assessed by the bootstrap test using 500 replicates. Sequences were trimmed to be in frame, which means that eight bases in the transition between gerAB and gerAC were removed, before entering into S.T.A.R.T. 2. This program was used to calculate the dN/ dS ratio (ratio of nonsynomous versus synonymous substitutions).
The B. licheniformis gerA promoter sequence was identified in DBTBS and prediction of transmembrane α-helices of GerAA and AB was performed using TOPCONS web program. Finally, three-dimensional (3D) structure modeling of GerAC was performed using RaptorX and PyMOL[61, 62]. All sequences were compared against the annotated sequence of the gerA operon (gerAA, gerAB, gerAC) of B. licheniformis ATCC14580/DSM 13 (YP_080584.1; YP_080585.1; YP_080586.1) and B. subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168 (NP_391185.2; NP_391186.1; NP_391187.1)[23, 63].
Construction of B. licheniformis MW3∆gerA complementation mutants
The entire gerA operons including the putative sigG promoter from B. licheniformis strain NVH1032, NVH800 and NVH1112 were cloned into the pHT315 shuttle vector and introduced into the gerAA deletion mutant strain MW3∆gerAA by electroporation as described previously. Briefly, PCR, with primers (Table 2) containing Sal I and Xba I restriction sites, was used to amplify the gerA operon including 151 bp upstream of the gerAA start codon and 177 bp downstream of the gerAC STOP codon. The amplified fragments were cloned into the Sal I/Xba I restriction site of pHT315, giving the complementation plasmids. For details regarding primers, PCR conditions, DNA isolation and electroporation see Løvdal et al. 2012. The strains created in this study were designated as follows: B. licheniformis NVH1309 (MW3∆gerAA _NVH1032gerA); NVH1321 (MW3∆gerAA _NVH1112gerA) and NVH1322 (MW3∆gerAA _NVH800gerA). Correct construction of the complementation plasmids was confirmed by sequencing and the complementation mutants were verified by PCR analysis. Sequence editing and alignments were performed as already described in the Data analysis section.
Bacterial growth and sporulation
Sporulation was performed according to Løvdal et al. 2012, with minor modifications. Bacteria were pre-cultured overnight in LB-broth with agitation (230 rpm) at 37°C. Complementation mutants were grown in presence of 1 μg mL-1 erythromycin. 10 μL of preculture was transferred to 50 mL of the non-defined, rich sporulation medium in 500 mL EM flasks. Incubation was performed with agitation (230 rpm) at 37°C for 3–7 days until ≥ 80% phase bright spores as judged by phase contrast microscopy. Seven of the strains (M55, ATCC9945A, NVH622, 749, M46, NVH1079 and LMG6934) did not sporulate adequately and were excluded from further analysis. Spores were harvested by centrifugation for 10 min at 3900 × g (Eppendorf) at 4°C and resuspended in 10 mL ice-cold autoclaved Milli-Q water. The spores were centrifuged at 10000 × g through a 50% (w/v) Nycodenz (Axis-Shield) gradient in order to remove cell debris and vegetative cells. The spores were washed three times in ice-cold autoclaved Milli-Q water before storage (1–3 months) in the dark at 4°C. The final spore suspensions were 98% free of vegetative cells, not fully sporulated cells, cell debris and germinated cells as judged by phase contrast microscopy.
Quantitative RT-PCR experiments were performed on mRNA isolated from B. licheniformis cultures harvested after ~ 50% sporulation judged by phase contrast microscopy. Total bacterial RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) and cells were disrupted using Lysing Matrix B (MP Biomedicals Europe) and bead beating in a Mini-BeadBeater-8 (BioSpec) according to manufacturer’s specifications. DNA was removed from each RNA preparation using Turbo DNA-free Kit (Ambion), according to manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quantity (A260) and purity (A260/280 ratio) were measured in a NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). cDNA was synthesised from 500 ng RNA using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) in a 20 μl reaction according to manufacturer’s protocols.
Five μl of a 1:100 dilution of the cDNA reaction was used as template for qPCR amplification in 25 μl final volumes containing 12.5 μl of Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and 200 nM of each primer. Primers used for qPCR are listed in Table 2. The amplification was performed using StepOne PCR software (Applied Biosystems) with thermal cycling conditions set at 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C. Fluorescence was monitored during each extension phase and a melting curve analysis was performed after each run to confirm the amplification of specific transcripts. Each qPCR of the RNA samples was performed in triplicate, no template was added in negative controls, and rpoB was used as internal control. The qPCR analysis was performed on three independent biological replicates. Slopes of the standard curves and PCR efficiency (E) for each primer pair were estimated by amplifying serial dilutions of the cDNA template. For quantification of mRNA transcript levels, Ct (threshold cycle) values of the target genes (gerAA) and the internal control gene (rpoB) derived from the same sample in each real-time PCR reaction were first transformed using the term E-Ct. The expression levels of target genes were then normalized by dividing their transformed Ct-values by the corresponding values obtained for internal control gene[64, 65].
Storage water was decanted and the spores were resuspended in autoclaved Milli-Q water (20°C) immediately before heat activation at 65°C in a heating block (QBD2, Grant Instruments Ltd) for 20 min. The heat-activated spores were rapidly cooled down by centrifugation for 3 min 4500 × g at 4°C before resuspension in germination buffer (200 mM K-phosphate buffer pH 7.2). The A600 of the buffered spore suspension was adjusted to ~2.1 (Shimadzu UV- 160A, Shimdazu Europe GMBH). L-Alanine (Sigma) was dissolved in Milli-Q water and filter sterilized prior to use through a 0.45 μm pore size filter. 100 μL of 0.05 - 0.2 M L-Alanine germinant solution was added to 100 μL buffered spore suspension in a 96-well microplate (BD) giving an initial A600 of ~1. Germination was by monitored by reading the drop in absorbance (A600) in a 96-well microplate reader (Tecan Infinite M200). Readings were performed at regular intervals (2 min) and the plate was shaken 10 s prior to each reading. Set point temperature during germination was 37°C (36.5 - 37.5). The screening of 46 strains was performed in duplicate with a single spore preparation. All other experiments were performed with three independent spore preparations.
The work was supported by grants from the Norwegian Research Council (grant 178299/I10), the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) and Centre for Food Safety, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
We would like to thank Kristin O’Sullivan and Kristin Cecilia Romundset for valuable contributions during the experimental part of this work. We are also grateful to Irene S. Løvdal for helpful discussions throughout this study.
- Heyndrickx M, Scheldeman P: Bacilli associated with spoilage in dairy products and other food. Applications and Systematics of Bacillus and Relatives. Edited by: Berkeley R. 2002, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science, 64-82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Setlow P, Johnson EA: Spores and their signifcance. Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers. Edited by: Doyle MP, Beuchat LR. 2007, Washington DC: ASM Press, 35-67.Google Scholar
- Setlow P: Spore germination. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003, 6 (6): 550-556.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moir A, Corfe BM, Behravan J: Spore germination. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002, 59 (3): 403-409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paredes-Sabja D, Setlow P, Mahfuzur RS: Germination of spores of Bacillales and Clostridial species: mechanisms and proteins involved. Trends Microbiol. 2011, 19 (2): 85-94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Logan NA: Bacillus and relatives in foodborne illness. J Appl Microbiol. 2012, 112 (3): 417-429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Setlow P: Spores of Bacillus subtilis: their resistance to and killing by radiation, heat and chemicals. J Appl Microbiol. 2006, 101: 514-525.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Løvdal IS, Hovda MB, Granum PE, Rosnes JT: Promoting Bacillus cereus spore germination for subsequent inactivation by mild heat treatment. J Food Prot. 2011, 74 (12): 2079-2089.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown JV, Wiles R, Prentice GA: The effect of a modified Tyndallization process upon the sporeforming bacteria of milk and cream. Int J Dairy Technol. 1979, 32 (2): 109-112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin JH, Blackwood PW: Effects of sub-lethal heat-shock, β-alanine, and L-alanine on germination and subsequent destruction of Bacillus spores by pasteurization. J Dairy Sci. 1972, 55 (5): 577-580.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gould GW: History of science-spores. J Appl Microbiol. 2006, 101: 507-513.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hornstra LM, ter Beek A, Smelt JP, Kallemeijn WW, Brul S: On the origin of heterogenity in (preservation) resistance of Bacillus spores: input for a ‘systems’ analysis approach of bacterial spore outgrowth. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009, 134: 9-15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghosh S, Setlow P: Isolation and characterization of superdormant spores of Bacillus species. J Bacteriol. 2008, 191 (6): 1787-1797.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang P, Garner W, Yi X, Yu J, Li Y, Setlow P: Factors affecting variability in time between addition of nutrient germinants and rapid dipicolinic acid release during germination of spores of Bacillus species. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192 (14): 3608-3619.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hudson KD, Corfe BM, Kemp EH, Feavers IM, Coote PJ, Moir A: Localization of GerAA and GerAC germination proteins in the Bacillus subtilis spore. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183 (14): 4317-4322.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paidhungat M, Setlow P: Localization of a germinant receptor protein (GerBA) to the inner membrane of Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183 (13): 3982-3990.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Korza G, Setlow P: Topology and accessibility of germination proteins in the Bacillus subtilis spore inner membrane. J Bacteriol. 2013, 195 (7): 1484-1491.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paidhungat M, Setlow P: Role of Ger proteins in nutrient and nonnutrient triggering of spore germination in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182 (9): 2513-2519.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ross C, Abel-Santos E: The ger receptor family from sporulating bacteria. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2011, 12: 147-158.Google Scholar
- van der Voort M, Garcia D, Moezelaar R, Abee T: Germinant receptor diversity and germination responses of four strains of the Bacillus cereus group. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010, 139 (1–2): 108-115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abee T, Groot MN, Tempelaars M, Zwietering M, Moezelaar R, van der Voort M: Germination and outgrowth of spores of Bacillus cereus group members: Diversity and role of germinant receptors. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28: 199-208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Broussolle V, Gauillard F, Nguyen-the C, Carlin F: Diversity of spore germination in response to inosine and L-alanine and its interaction with NaCl and pH in the Bacillus cereus group. J Appl Microbiol. 2008, 105: 1081-1090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zuberi AR, Moir A, Feavers IM: The nucleotide sequence and gene organization of the gerA spore germination operon of Bacillus subtilis 168. Gene. 1987, 51 (1): 1-11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feavers IM, Foulkes J, Setlow B, Sun D, Nicholson W, Setlow P, Moir A: The regulation of transcription of the gerA spore germination operon of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 1990, 4 (2): 275-282.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rey MW, Ramaiya P, Nelson BA, Brody-Karpin SD, Zaretsky EJ, Tang M, Lopez de Leon A, Xiang H, Gusti V, Groth Clausen I, Clausen IG, Olsen PB, Rasmussen MD, Andersen JT, Jørgensen PL, Larsen TS, Sorokin A, Bolotin A, Lapidus A, Galleron N, Ehrlich SD, Berka RM: Complete genome sequence of the industrial bacterium Bacillus licheniformis and comparisons with closely related Bacillus species. Genome Biol. 2004, 5 (10): r77-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veith B, Herzberg C, Steckel S, Feesche J, Maurer KH, Ehrenreich P, Bäumer S, Henne A, Liesegang H, Merkl R, Ehrenreich A, Gottschalk G: The complete genome sequence of Bacillus licheniformis DSM13, an organism with great industrial potential. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004, 7: 204-211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiao Y, Francke C, Abee T, Wells-Bennik MHJ: Clostridial spore germination versus bacilli: genome mining and current insights. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28 (2): 266-274.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Løvdal IS, From C, Madslien EH, Romundset KCS, Klufterud E, Rosnes JT, Granum PE: Role of the gerA operon in L-alanine germination of Bacillus licheniformis spores. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12 (1): 34-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson MJ, Carlson PE, Janes BK, Hanna PC: Membrane topology of the Bacillus anthraci s GerH germinant receptor proteins. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194 (6): 1369-1377.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Igarashi T, Setlow B, Paidhungat M, Setlow P: Effects of a gerF (lgt) mutation on the germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (10): 2984-2991.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Setlow B, Setlow P, Hao B: Crystal structure of the GerBC component of a Bacillus subtilis spore germinant receptor. J Mol Biol. 2010, 402 (1): 8-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christie G, Lowe CR: Amino acid substitutions in transmembrane domains 9 and 10 of GerVB that affect the germination properties of Bacillus megaterium spores. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190 (24): 8009-8017.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Madslien EH, Olsen JS, Granum PE, Blatny JM: Genotyping of B. licheniformis based on a novel multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) scheme. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12 (1): 230-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Behravan J, Chirakkal H, Masson A, Moir A: Mutations in the gerP locus of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus affect access of germinants to their targets in spores. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182 (7): 1987-1994.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghosh S, Scotland M, Setlow P: Levels of germination proteins in dormant and superdormant spores of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194 (9): 2221-2227.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christie G, Lazarevska M, Lowe CR: Functional consequences of amino acid substitutions to GerVB, a component of the Bacillus megaterium spore germinant receptor. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190 (6): 2014-2022.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yi X, Liu J, Faeder JR, Setlow P: Synergism between different germinant receptors in the germination of Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol. 2011, 193 (18): 4664-4671.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang P, Thomas S, Li Y, Setlow P: Effects of cortex peptidoglycan structure and cortex hydrolysis on the kinetics of Ca2 + -dipicolinic acid release during Bacillus subtilis spore germination. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194 (3): 646-652.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths KK, Zhang J, Cowan AE, Yu J, Setlow P: Germination proteins in the inner membrane of dormant Bacillus subtilis spores colocalize in a discrete cluster. Mol Microbiol. 2011, 81 (4): 1061-1077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stewart KA, Setlow P: Numbers of individual nutrient germinant receptors and other germination proteins in spores of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2013, 195 (16): 3575-3582.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paidhungat M, Setlow P: Spore germination and outgrowth. Bacillus Subtilis and its Closest Relatives: From Genes to Cells. Edited by: Sonenshein AL, Hoch JA, Losick R. 2002, Washington, D.C: ASM, 537-548.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramirez-Peralta A, Zhang P, Li Y, Setlow P: Effects of sporulation conditions on the germination and germination protein levels of Bacillus subtilis spores. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012, 78 (8): 2689-2697.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kryazhimskiy S, Plotkin JB: The population genetics of dN/dS. PLoS Gen. 2008, 4 (12): e1000304-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rocha EPC, Smith JM, Hurst LD, Holden MTG, Cooper JE, Smith NH, Feil EJ: Comparisons of dN/dS are time dependent for closely related bacterial genomes. J Theor Biol. 2006, 239 (2): 226-235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cabrera-Martinez R, Tovar-Rojo F, Vepachedu VR, Setlow P: Effects of overexpression of nutrient receptors on germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185 (8): 2457-2464.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stewart K, Yi X, Ghosh S, Setlow P: Germination protein levels and rates of germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis with overexpressed or deleted genes encoding germination proteins. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194 (12): 3156-3164.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arantes O, Lereclus D: Construction of cloning vectors for Bacillus thuringiensis. Gene. 1991, 108 (1): 115-119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mongkolthanaruk W, Cooper GR, Mawer JSP, Allan RN, Moir A: Effect of amino acid substitutions in the GerAA protein on the function of the alanine-responsive germinant receptor of Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol. 2011, 193 (9): 2268-2275.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cooper GR, Moir A: Amino acid residues in the GerAB protein important in the function and assembly of the alanine spore germination receptor of Bacillus subtilis 168. J Bacteriol. 2011, 193 (9): 2261-2267.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Catta P, Stewart K, Dufner M, Setlow P, Hao B: Structure-based functional studies of the effects of amino acid substitutions in GerBC, the C subunit of the Bacillus subtilis GerB spore germinant receptor. J Bacteriol. 2011, 193 (16): 4143-4152.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waschkau B, Waldeck J, Wieland S, Eichstadt R, Meinhardt F: Generation of readily transformable Bacillus licheniformis mutants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008, 78 (1): 181-188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Staden R: The staden sequence analysis package. Mol Biotechnol. 1996, 5: 233-241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011, 28 (10): 2731-2739.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22 (22): 4673-4680.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987, 4 (4): 406-425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (8): 1596-1599.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jolley KA, Feil EJ, Chan MS, Maiden MC: Sequence type analysis and recombinational tests (START). Bioinformatics. 2001, 17 (12): 1230-1231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nei M, Gojobori T: Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 1986, 3 (5): 418-426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sierro N, Makita Y, de Hoon M, Nakai K: DBTBS: a database of transcriptional regulation in Bacillus subtilis containing upstream intergenic conservation information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (suppl 1): D93-D96.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bernsel A, Viklund H, Hennerdal A, Elofsson A: TOPCONS: consensus prediction of membrane protein topology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (suppl 2): W465-W468.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Källberg M, Wang H, Wang S, Peng J, Wang Z, Lu H, Xu J: Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server. Nat Protoc. 2012, 7 (8): 1511-1522.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeLano WL: The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. 2002, San Carlos, CA: DeLano Scientific, [http://www.pymol.org] Google Scholar
- Kunst F, Ogasawara N, Moszer I, Albertini AM, Alloni G, Azevedo V, Bertero MG, Bessieres P, Bolotin A, Borchert S, Borriss R, Boursier L, Brans A, Braun M, Brignell SC, Bron S, Brouillet S, Bruschi CV, Caldwell B, Capuano V, Carter NM, Choi SK, Codani JJ, Connerton IF, Cummings NJ, Daniel RA, Denizot F, Devine KM, Düsterhöft A, Ehrlich SD: The complete genome sequence of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature. 1997, 390 (6657): 249-256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pfaffl MW: A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29 (9): e45-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duodu S, Holst-Jensen A, Skjerdal T, Cappelier JM, Pilet MF, Loncarevic S: Influence of storage temperature on gene expression and virulence potential of Listeria monocytogene s strains grown in a salmon matrix. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27 (6): 795-801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.