Skip to main content

Development and validation of a real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of Tuber magnatum in soil



Tuber magnatum, the Italian white truffle, is the most sought-after edible ectomycorrhizal mushroom. Previous studies report the difficulties of detecting its mycorrhizas and the widespread presence of its mycelium in natural production areas, suggesting that the soil mycelium could be a good indicator to evaluate its presence in the soil. In this study a specific real-time PCR assay using TaqMan chemistry was developed to detect and quantify T. magnatum in soil. This technique was then applied to four natural T. magnatum truffières located in different regions of Italy to validate the method under different environmental conditions.


The primer/probe sets for the detection and quantification of T. magnatum were selected from the ITS rDNA regions. Their specificity was tested in silico and using qualitative PCR on DNA extracted from 25 different fungal species. The T. magnatum DNA concentration was different in the four experimental truffières and higher in the productive plots. T. magnatum mycelium was however also detected in most of the non-productive plots. Ascoma production during the three years of the study was correlated with the concentration of T. magnatum DNA.


Taken together, these results suggest that the specific real-time PCR assay perfected in this study could be an useful tool to evaluate the presence and dynamics of this precious truffle in natural and cultivated truffières.


Truffles are hypogeous ectomycorrhizal Ascomycetes belonging to the order Pezizales. The most sought-after species belong to the Tuber genus and include Tuber melanosporum Vittad. (Périgord black truffle), Tuber magnatum Pico (Italian white truffle), Tuber aestivum Vittad. (Burgundy truffle) and Tuber borchii Vittad. (bianchetto). Amongst these the Italian white truffle commands the highest prices. This truffle grows in many regions of Italy: from Piedmont in the north, where Alba is the most famous production area, to Basilicata in the extreme south of Italy [1]. It is also found in Croatia and has recently been found, although in small quantities, in Romania, Serbia, Hungary and Slovenia [24].

Methods have been developed to produce T. magnatum infected trees using spore inoculation techniques [57] or root organ cultures [8]. However, while some successes are reported [9] in general attempts to cultivate this truffle species have met with failure [1, 10, 11]. This failure to produce T. magnatum fruiting bodies from cultivated plots has been compounded by falling harvests from natural truffières, attributed to deforestation, changing forest management practices, global warming since the last ice age as well as acid rain [12]. These factors have spurred efforts to carry out research aimed at safeguarding T. magnatum production in natural truffières and developing tools to evaluate their state of “health”.

In contrast to the other truffles such as T. melanosporum T. aestivum and T. borchii, which are comparatively easy to cultivate, T. magnatum mycorrhizas are scarce or absent even where their ascomata are found [13, 14]. On the other hand, recent studies have shown that T. magnatum mycelium is widely distributed in the soil of truffières and its presence is not restricted to just those points where mycorrhizas or ascomata are found [15]. These observations suggest that T. magnatum soil mycelium could be a better indicator than mycorrhiza for assessing its presence in the soil.

DNA-based techniques have been extensively applied to study fungal ecology in soil [16]. Recently, real-time PCR has made it possible not only to detect and monitor the distribution of a particular fungus but also its abundance [1720]. Knowledge of the distribution, dynamics and activities of Tuber spp. mycelium in soil can be considered crucial for monitoring the status of a cultivated truffle orchard before ascoma production [21]. It is also a powerful tool for assessing truffle presence in natural forests in those countries where ascoma harvesting is forbidden [22] or where all truffle collectors have open access to forests and woodlands [1]. This is particularly important for T. magnatum as the truffle production sites, in natural truffières, are dispersed and not visible to the naked eye, unlike black truffles (T. melanosporum and T. aestivum) which produce burnt areas (called “brûlée” in France, “bruciate” or “pianello” in Italy) around the productive trees where grass development is inhibited [1].

In this study a specific real-time PCR assay using TaqMan chemistry was developed to detect and quantify T. magnatum in soil. This technique was then applied to four natural T. magnatum truffières in different Italian regions to validate the method under different environmental conditions.

Results and discussion

DNA extraction

Successful application of molecular-based techniques for DNA analyses of environmental samples strongly depends on the quality of the DNA extracted [23]. Moreover, the heterogeneous distribution of fungi in soil with small samples (<1 g) can lead to an unrepresentative fungal fingerprinting [24]. For this reason total DNA was isolated from 15 g of lyophilized soil for each plot (3 sub-samples of 5 g each), selected from about 60 g of sampled soil from each plot, using a procedure specifically developed to obtain good quality extracts regardless of the different soil types analysed in this study. To obtain equal 3 ml-solutions of crude DNA from the different soils we had to process samples from Emilia-Romagna/Tuscany and Molise/Abruzzo truffle areas with different quantities of CTAB lysis buffer (6 and 7 ml respectively) at the beginning of the extraction step. A total of 351 extractions (3 replicates per 117 soil samples) were successfully carried out using this improved method. The mean quantity of DNA isolated from samples processed in this study range from 2.2 to 7.0 μg g−1 of soil for the Molise and Tuscan truffières respectively.

ANOVA was performed to determine whether the quantities of DNA isolated from the sampled soil varied in the different truffières. The data reveal significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between DNA isolated from the soil samples of the different truffières (Table 1). The lowest values were obtained from samples collected in the Molise and Abruzzo truffières. This may be due to the higher clay content in the soil of these two experimental truffières. Indeed, DNA extraction is difficult for soils containing clay [25, 26] and DNA adsorption and desorption is strongly affected by the clay type and content [27]. Other factors such as climate, soil, and vegetation conditions may however also contribute to modifying microbial activity below ground and consequently the quantity of total DNA isolated.

Table 1 Mean values and statistics of soil DNA extractions and real time PCRs

Mean values of the OD260/280 nm and OD260/230 nm ratios calculated for each truffière range from 1.73 to 1.77 and from 1.65 to 1.71 respectively.

Primer and probe selection

The ITS regions were chosen to develop an appropriate primer/probe set for the detection and quantification of T. magnatum. The use of these genomic regions as the target for real time PCR-amplification has proven to be a successful strategy for different ectomycorrhizal fungi in soil [19, 21, 28]. This is due to the large number of sequences available in genetic databases that make ITS regions suitable for designing reliable species-specific primers. Moreover, the presence of multiple copies of rDNA units within each fungal genome also make it possible to detect low quantities of the target DNA [29]. ITS regions are not, however, equally variable in all groups of fungi [30] and this could represent a limitation for designing a specific primer in some species [31]. The alignment of about 70 ITS1-5.8 S-ITS2 T. magnatum sequences retrieved from the GenBank database highlighted a high level of conservation of ITS regions in this species (0/186 nt for ITS1 and 2/217 for ITS2), higher than those found in other truffle species [3234].

A single primer/probe set was selected for both the ITS1 and the ITS2 region (Table 2) based on in silico analyses of their composition, Tm, PCR-impairing structure formation and specificity against the sequences in GenBank. Both of the primer pairs selected produced specific amplicons of the expected size for all the T. magnatum specimens considered in this study and gave no cross-reactions with other fungal species under qualitative PCR conditions (Table 3). Specificity of the probes was also confirmed (data not shown). However, the primers and probe designed from ITS1 were selected for the subsequent real-time PCR analyses, as they provided more efficient amplification (Figure 1). Indeed, the TmgITS1for-TmgITS1rev primer pair allowed detection of the specific amplicon down to dilutions of 1/1000 (0.1 ng of T. magnatum DNA mixed with 100 ng of non-target DNAs), ten fold lower than TmgITS2for-TmgITS2rev. The specificity of the ITS1 primer/probe set was also confirmed under real-time PCR conditions for all soil samples processed.

Table 2 Primers and probes tested in this study
Table 3 Collection numbers and origin of the fungal materials used in this study
Figure 1

PCR sensitivity of the primer pairs selected from ITS1 and ITS2 regions. Reactions carried out using serial dilutions of T. magnatum DNA (TM-DNA) in pooled non-target fungal DNAs (F-DNA): lane M, Mass ruler marker (Fermenats); lanes 1, 3, 5 and 7, ITS1for-ITS1rev primer pair; lanes 2, 4, 6 and 8, ITS2for-ITS2rev primer pair. Lanes 1–2, 10 ng TM-DNA/90 ng F-DNA; lanes 3–4, 1 ng TM-DNA/99 ng F-DNA; lanes 5–6, 0.1 ng TM-DNA/99.9 ng F-DNA; lanes 7–8, 0.01 ng TM-DNA/99.99 ng F-DNA.

Real time quantification of T. magnatum DNA

The real-time assay showed reliable amplification over the 6 orders of magnitude generating almost identical standard curves from each run quantifying T. magnatum DNA in soil samples. The correlation coefficients (R2 values) were always higher than 0.99 and amplification efficiency was about 85%. The mean standard curve resulting from 18 independent plates is shown in Figure 2. The detection limit for real-time PCR with the ITS1 primer/probe set was approximately 10 fg. However, since standard replicates containing less than 100 fg of T. magnatum DNA gave inconsistent amplifications, to avoid the inclusion of false positive test results, values lower than this threshold were considered as 0.

Figure 2

Real-time PCR standard curve for T. magnatum DNA quantification. The curve was generated by plotting the means of the Ct values obtained against the logarithm of a known quantity of genomic DNA. Variability is shown as the mean Ct value ± SD.

Detection of T. magnatum ascomata and DNA

Truffle production was scattered and localized in only 17 of the 39 plots examined. A total of 74 T. magnatum ascomata, for a total weight of 1184.3 g, were collected over the 3-year period of investigation in the 4 experimental truffières (Additional file 1).

There was a high variation in the concentration of T. magnatum DNA detected by real-time PCR in the 117 samples processed, even from the same plot, over the three years of sampling thus confirming that mycelium varies considerably in the soil over time [28]. No fluorescence was ever recorded in DNA from the soil samples collected outside the truffière in any of the experimental sites.

The mean concentration of T. magnatum DNA detected in the four different truffières was statistically different indicating that environmental condition, such as climate, vegetation, soil chemical and biological characteristics, influence the relative quantity of T. magnatum DNA in the soil (Table 1). The lowest mean concentration of target DNA was associated with the soil samples collected in the Molise truffière. In this experimental site significant amounts of T. magnatum DNA were only detected in the unique plot that produced ascomata during the 3 years of the survey. On the contrary, soil samples from the Tuscan truffière showed the highest mean value for DNA concentration and positive real-time amplifications were obtained for all plots. T. magnatum DNA was also found in plots that never produced truffles during the three years of the study (Table 1). This can be explained by the fact that, in soil, T. magnatum mycelium is able to develop as far as 100 m from the production points [15], thus forming large mycelial patches that may colonize other contiguous plots. Higher mean values for T. magnatum DNA concentrations were however obtained from productive plots (Table 1) even if in Tuscany and Abruzzo no significant differences were found between productive and non-productive plots. This is probably due to the high percentage of productive plots of these two truffières where mycelial patches may have overlapped. Despite this, there was a significant correlation (p-level ≤ 0.05) between the mean T. magnatum DNA concentration and plot productivity (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, respectively 0.56 and 0.55 for the number and the weight of ascomata collected in the three years of the study). These results indicate that the production of T. magnatum fruiting bodies is positively related to the presence of mycelium in the soil although the fructification process is limited in space by other factors which are still not clear.

In previous studies of T. melanosporum it was found that the presence of a burnt area around a tree infected by T. melanosporum was related to the quantity of its mycelium in the soil [20]. These Authors, however, found a higher quantity of the mycelium in non-productive trees and explained this as a shift in resource allocation by the fungal ascoma. In our study we found the highest quantity of T. magnatum DNA in the productive plots, indicating that this truffle species has a different behaviour in the soil. As T. magnatum mycorrhizas are rare or absent in the productive areas and probably unable to support fruiting body formation, its free live mycelium should provide a sufficient quantity of nutrients to support ascoma formation and successive development. It has already been shown that after their formation in the soil truffle ascomata have a saprobic phase and, during their maturation, become nutritionally independent on the host plant. Probably, in T. magnatum, this saprobic phase is much more important than previously considered and as also suggested by Zampieri et al. [15].


The results reported here demonstrate that the real-time PCR assay developed in this study can be an effective tool for quantifying T. magnatum in the soil and for monitoring the presence of this precious fungus, regardless of truffle production. This technique could be a useful tool to evaluate the “health” of natural and cultivated truffières and to assess the effect of different cultivation techniques. This aspect is particularly important because in natural truffières ascoma production is dispersed and depends on annual climatic conditions. Thus many years of survey are necessary to evaluate the effects of any new variable. Moreover, it is difficult to assess truffle production in natural truffières because in Italy there is no control of truffle harvesting in the forests and numerous different truffle hunters may visit a single truffière in one day [1].

Real-time PCR will make it possible to carry out further studies on the spatial and seasonal changes in the quantity of T. magnatum mycelium in the soil to gain more knowledge on its biology and ecology.


Experimental truffières

For this study four natural T. magnatum truffières located in four different Italian regions (Emilia Romagna, Tuscany, Abruzzo and Molise) were chosen on the basis of their high T. magnatum ascoma productivity. All these truffières are closed to the public so the scientific data on production collected are more meaningful.

The Emilia Romagna experimental truffière is located in the Museum of the Bonifica Renana park at Argenta (Ferrara) (latitude 44° 37′ 10″ N, longitude 11° 48′ 55″ E, altitude 5 m asl). This truffière is representative of the natural T. magnatum production areas in the Po valley that are mostly located in private or public gardens and parks, the natural indigenous forest having been largely supplanted by agriculture. The putative T. magnatum host plants are poplar (Populus nigra L.) and linden (Tilia vulgaris Hayne). The soil of the truffière is calcareous (10–25% of total CaCO3) with a pH ranging from 7.9 to 8.3 in the different plots.

The Tuscany, Abruzzo and Molise experimental truffières are representative of the natural T. magnatum truffières in the broad-leaved forests of the Apennine mountains of central-southern Italy. The Tuscan truffière is located at Barbialla nuova, Montaione (Florence) (latitude 43° 35′ 30″N, longitude 10° 50′ 55″ E, altitude 135 m asl). The putative host plants are hornbeam (Ostrya carpinifolia Scop.), poplar (Populus alba L.) and oaks (Quercus cerris L., Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl., Quercus ilex L.). The soil has a CaCO3 content ranging from 4 to 10% and a pH of 7.7-8.4.

The Abruzzo and Molise truffières are located in two Man & Biospher reserves managed by the Biodiversity Office of the State Forestry Corps: Feudozzo (Abruzzo) (latitude 41° 45′ 55″ N, longitude 14° 11′ 12″ E, altitude 950 m asl), and Collemeluccio (Molise) (latitude 41° 42′ 07″ N, longitude 14° 20′ 34″ E, altitude 810 m asl). In both areas there is a large contingent of meso-hygrophilous species, favoured by the presence of surface water, probably due to the proximity of small springs. There are many putative host plants in both truffières: at Feudozzo (Abruzzo) poplar (Populus tremula L.), oak (Q. cerris), willow (Salix alba L., Salix apennina Skvortsov, Salix caprea L. and Salix purpurea L.), hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L. and Carpinus orientalis Miller) and hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.); at Collemeluccio (Molise) poplar (P. nigra and P. canadensis L.), oak (Q. cerris), linden (Tilia platyphyllos Scop.), silver fir (Abies alba Miller), hazelnut (C. avellana) and hornbeam (O. carpinifolia). However, all T. magnatum collection occurred beneath A. alba. The geological substratum is represented by alternating argillaceous sandstone: at Feudozzo, the soil has a CaCO3 content ranging from 0.75 to 4.20% and a pH of 6.8-7.8; at Collemeluccio the soil has a CaCO3 content ranging from 1.69 to 2.64% and a pH of 6.8-7.4.

As production areas are often of different dimensions and their productivity varies considerably, in the experimental truffière productive plots of 300–500 m2 were selected on the basis of the confidential indications of their productivity provided by local truffle hunters and their real productivity was established over the three years of the study. A total of 39 plots (9 in Tuscany, 9 in Emilia Romagna, 9 in Molise and 12 in Abruzzo) were identified and delimited. Details of the pedological and vegetative characteristics of each experimental truffière plot are described in the project website [3638].

Assessment of truffle production

We used trained dogs to assess truffle production every week in the T. magnatum season (September-December) for three consecutive years (2008–2010). The truffles collected were numbered, weighed and recorded for each plot.

Experimental layout

Soil cores (1.6 cm diameter, 30 cm deep) were extracted using a disposable, cylindrical, polyvinyl chloride tube inserted inside a steel soil borer, purpose-built for this study. A set of 9 equidistant soil cores were taken from each plot along two diagonal lines, excluding a border area of 5 m on each side of the plot to minimize possible edge effects. Sampling was carried out in January 2009, 2010 and 2011 at the end of the annual white truffle season.

The soil cores collected from each plot were pooled together to obtain a sample per plot for each year and any root fragments, stones or organic debris were carefully removed using a stereomicroscope. A control soil sample was also collected 200 m outside each experimental truffière from non-productive areas. The soil was stored at −80°C and then lyophilized the for three days using the Virtis Benchtop 2 K freeze dryer (SP Industries, Gardiner, New York). After drying, each sample was finely ground in a mortar, sieved, homogenized and stored at −20°C until DNA extraction was performed.

Soil DNA extraction

A DNA extraction procedure was specifically developed for all the four types of soil analysed in this study. Three replicates (5 g each) were prepared for each soil sample, re-suspended in 6–7 ml of CTAB lysis buffer (2% CTAB, 2% Polyvinylpyrrolidon, 2 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8) and processed according the detailed protocol described in Additional file 2. Brown crude DNA solutions (about 3 ml in volume) from each reaction were obtained following this extraction phase and 1 ml aliquots were then purified using the Nucleospin Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions with slight modifications (see Additional file 2). Total DNAs were finally eluted in 65 μl of elution buffer (5 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.5). The amount of DNA in each extract was quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). The quality of the total DNAs was evaluated with optical density (OD) 260/280 nm and 260/230 nm ratios. Extractions with OD ratios less than 1.4 and DNA quantity less than 25 ng μl–1 were repeated. In addition soil DNA extracts were PCR-amplified with primer pair ITS1-ITS4 [39] to confirm the absence of DNA polymerase inhibitors. Extracts with positive ITS1-ITS4 amplification products (from 500 bp to 1000 bp) were considered suitable for quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays. Purified DNAs were stored at −80°C until processed.

Primer and probe selection

ITS1-5.8 S-ITS2 rDNA sequences of T. magnatum and other truffle species were retrieved from GenBank database (; date of accession: June, 2008) and aligned with Multalign [40] to identify species-specific domains for primer and probe selection. Oligonucleotide design was carried out with Primer3 software ( [41] with the following parameters: amplicon size 90–110, primer size 18–22 bp (opt. 20 bp), melting temperature 58-62°C (opt. 60°C), GC content 40-60% (opt. 50%), Max Self Complementarity = 5. Secondary structures and dimer formation were verified using Oligo Analyzer 1.0.3 software (Freeware, Teemu Kuulasmaa, Finland) and specificity was firstly evaluated in silico using BLASTN algorithm ( A primer pair and the respective probe was selected for both the ITS1 and the ITS2 region (Table 2) and their specificity was then confirmed with qualitative PCR against genomic DNA of different mycorrhizal, saprobic and pathogenic fungi (Table 3). The specificity of the oligonucleotides selected as probes was tested in PCR reactions using their opposite primers (TmgITS1rev with TmgITS1prob and TmgITS2for with TmgITS2prob). Fungal DNA was isolated from fruiting bodies or mycelia using the Nucleospin Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for fungi. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the selected primer pairs was assessed by amplifying T. magnatum DNA 10-fold serial dilutions (from 10 ng to 0.001 ng) in pooled genomic DNAs from the other fungal species used in this study.

Conventional PCRs were performed on 25 μl reaction mixture volumes containing 100 ng of total DNA, 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM for each dNTP, 400 nM for each primer and 1.5 U of TaKaRaTM rTaq DNA polymerase (Takara, Otsu, Japan). PCR conditions were as follow: 25 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 60°C for 30 s, 72°C for 40 s with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 6 min and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. PCR products were electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide in a GeneGenius Imaging System (SynGene, Cambridge, UK).

Real-time PCR

TaqMan PCR assays were carried out in 96-well optical plates (Bioplastic) using a Stratagene Mx3000P QPCR system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Each amplification was performed on 25-μl reaction volumes containing 12.5 (1X) μl of Maxima Probe qPCR Master mix (Fermentas), 30 nM of ROX and 200 ng of total DNA. Primer and probe concentration were optimised to 0.5 μM and 0.2 μM respectively based on the lowest threshold cycle (Ct) values and the highest fluorescent signal. The TaqMan probe was labelled at the 5’end with the fluorescent reporter dye FAM (6-carboxy-fluorescin) while the 3′ end was modified with the quencher dye TAMRA (6-carboxy-tetramethylrhodamine) (MWG BIOTECH, Ebersberg, Germany). Two replicates per soil sample and no template controls were prepared for each plate and Real-time PCRs were repeated twice to confirm the results.

The optimised thermal cycle protocol included a 10 min incubation at 95°C followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. The threshold fluorescence level was determined with the default adaptive baseline algorithm of the MXPro software (version 4.10) (Agilent technologies) and the resulting Ct values were automatically converted to quantities of T. magnatum DNA using the standard curve method. A standard curve was generated for each run with a series of ten-fold dilutions of genomic DNA from T. magnatum (from 107 to 102 fg per reaction) as standards. To evaluate the real-time PCR detection limit further serial dilutions of 1 and 10 fg of T. magnatum DNA were tested in triplicate. All real-time PCR products were electrophoresed as described above to exclude amplification of non-target sequences.

Data analysis

ANOVA was applied to check for significant differences in the amount of DNA extracted and the T. magnatum DNA concentrations obtained from the different trufféres. When significant differences were encountered, mean values were compared using Bonferroni’s test. The non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to verify the results obtained with the ANOVA. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated to determine correlations between T. magnatum DNA concentration and truffle production (ascoma number and weight). The significance level was set at the 5% probability level. Statistical analyses were performed using XLSTAT- Pro 7.5 (Addinsoft, Paris, France).



Optical density


Internal transcribed spacer


Above sea level


Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide


Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt


Threshold cycle






  1. 1.

    Hall I, Brown GT, Zambonelli A: Taming the Truffle. 2007, Timber Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Glamočlija J, Vujičić R, Vukojević J: Evidence of truffles in Serbia. Mycotaxon. 1997, 65: 211-222.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ceruti A, Fontana A, Nosenzo C: Le specie europee del genere Tuber: una revisione storica. Monografie n° 37. 2003, Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gogan A: Studies on cultivation possibilities of summer truffle (Tuber aestivumVittad.) and smooth black truffle (Tuber macrosporumVittad.) in Hungary. PhD thesis.: -Gödöllő University, Institute of Horticultural Technologies, 2011. []

  5. 5.

    Mello A, Fontana A, Meotto F, Comandini O, Bonfante P: Molecular and morphological characterization ofTuber magnatummycorrhizas in a long-term survey. Microbiol Res. 2001, 155: 279-284. 10.1016/S0944-5013(01)80005-7.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rubini A, Paolocci F, Granetti B, Arcioni S: Morphological characterization of molecular-typedTuber magnatumectomycorrhizae. Mycorrhiza. 2001, 11: 179-185. 10.1007/s005720100116.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rubini A, Riccioni C, Arcioni S, Paolocci F: Troubles with truffles: unveiling more of their biology. New Phytol. 2007, 174: 256-259. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01976.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Buee M, Martin F: Method for obtainingTuber magnatummycelium and mycelium obtained by means of the method. : -Pub. No.: WO/2009/136049 International Application No.: PCT/FR2009/050582 []

  9. 9.

    Bencivenga M, Di Massimo G, Donnini D, Baciarelli Falini L: The cultivation of truffles in Italy. Acta Botanica Yunnanica. 2009, 16 (Suppl 16): 100-102.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gregori G: Problems and expectations with the cultivation ofTuber magnatum. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Edible Mycorrhizal Mushrooms: 3–5 July 2001; Christchurch. Edited by: Ian R. 2001, Hall, Yun Wang, Eric Danell, Alessandra Zambonelli: Institute for Crop and Food Research Limited,  , CD Room

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hall IR, Zambonelli A, Primavera F: Ectomycorrhizal fungi with edible fruiting bodies. 3.Tuber magnatum. Econ Bot. 1998, 52: 192-200. 10.1007/BF02861209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hall IR, Yun W, Amicucci A: Cultivation of edible ectomycorrhizal mushrooms. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21 (10): 433-438. 10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00204-X.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bertini L, Rossi I, Zambonelli A, Amicucci A, Sacchi A, Cecchini M, Gregori G, Stocchi V: Molecular identification ofTuber magnatumectomycorrhizae in the field. Microbiol Res. 2005, 161: 59-64.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Murat C, Vizzini A, Bonfante P, Mello A: Morphological and molecular typing of the below-ground fungal community in a naturalTuber magnatumtruffle-ground. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005, 245: 307-313. 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.03.019.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zampieri E, Murat C, Cagnasso M, Bonfante P, Mello A: Soil analysis reveals the presence of an extended mycelial network in aTuber magnatumtruffle ground. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010, 71: 43-49. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00783.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chemidlin Prévost-Bouré N, Christen R, Dequiedt S, Mougel C, Lelièvre M, Claudy Jolivet C, Shahbazkia HR, Guillou L, Arrouays D, Ranjard L: Validation and application of a PCR primer set to quantify fungal communities in the soil environment by real-time quantitative PCR. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (9): e24166-10.1371/journal.pone.0024166.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Landeweert R, Veenman C, Kuyper TW, Fritze H, Wernars K, Smit E: Quantification of ectomycorrhizal mycelium in soil by real-time PCR compared to conventional quantification techniques. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003, 45: 283-292. 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00163-6.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kennedy PG, Bergemann SE, Hortal S, Bruns TD: Determining the outcome of field-based competition between twoRhizopogonspecies using real-time PCR. Mol Ecol. 2007, 16: 881-890.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Parladé J, Hortal S, Pera J, Galipienso L: Quantitative detection ofLactarius deliciosusextraradical soil mycelium by real-time PCR and its application in the study of fungal persistence and interspecific competition. J Biotechnol. 2007, 128: 14-23. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.09.010.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Suz LM, Martin MP, Oliach D, Fischer CR, Colinas C: Mycelial abundance and other factors related to truffle productivity inTuber melanosporum-Quercus ilexorchards. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008, 285: 72-78. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01213.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Suz LM, Martın MP, Colinas C: Detection ofTuber melanosporumDNA in soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006, 254: 251-257. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2005.00029.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gryndler M, Hršelová H, Soukupová L, Streiblová E, Valda S, Borovička J, Gryndlerová H, Gažo J, Miko M: Detection of summer truffle (Tuber aestivum Vittad.) in ectomycorrhizae and in soil using specific primers. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011, 318: 84-89. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02243.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Feinstein LM, Sul WJ, Blackwood CB: Assessment of bias associated with incomplete extraction of microbial DNA from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009, 75: 5428-5433. 10.1128/AEM.00120-09.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ranjard L, Lejon DP, Mougel C, Schehrer L, Merdinoglu D, Chaussod R: Sampling strategy in molecular microbial ecology: influence of soil sample size on DNA fingerprinting analysis of fungal and bacterial communities. Environ Microbiol. 2003, 5: 1111-1120. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00521.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Braid MD, Daniels LM, Kitts CL: Removal of PCR inhibitors from soil DNA by chemical flocculation. J Microbiol Meth. 2003, 52: 389-393.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yankson KK, Steck TR: Strategy for extracting DNA from clay soil and detecting a specific target sequence via selective enrichment and real-time (quantitative) PCR amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009, 75: 6017-6021. 10.1128/AEM.00211-09.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cai P, Huang Q, Zhang X, Chen H: Adsorption of DNA on clay minerals and various colloidal particles from an Alfisol. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006, 38: 471-476. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.05.019.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    De la Varga H, Águeda B, Martínez-Peña F, Parladé J, Pera J: Quantification of extraradical soil mycelium and ectomycorrhizas ofBoletus edulisin a Scots pine forest with variable sporocarp productivity. Mycorrhiza. 2011,: -10.1007/s00572-011-0382-2.

  29. 29.

    Bridge P, Spooner BM: Soil fungi: diversity and detection. Plant Soil. 2001, 232: 47-154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Hallenberg N, Larsson KH: Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and Its implications for molecular species identification. Evol Bioinform. 2008, 4: 193-201.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Iotti M, Amicucci A, Bonito G, Bonuso E, Stocchi V, Zambonelli A: Selection of a set of specific primers for the identification ofTuber rufum: a truffle species with high genetic variability. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007, 277: 223-231. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00963.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mello A, Murat C, Vizzini A, Gavazza V, Bonfante P: Tuber magnatumPico, a species of limited geographical distribution: its genetic diversity inside and outside a truffle ground. Environ Microbiol. 2005, 7: 55-65. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00678.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Murat C, Díez J, Luis P, Delaruelle C, Dupré C, Chevalier G, Bonfante P, Martin F: Polymorphism at the ribosomal DNA ITS and its relation to postglacial re-colonization routes of the Perigord truffleTuber melanosporum. New Phytol. 2004, 164: 401-411. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01189.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wedén C, Danell E, Camacho FJ, Backlund A: The population of the hypogeous fungus Tuber aestivum syn. T. uncinatum on the island of Gotland. Mycorrhiza. 2004, 14: 19-23. 10.1007/s00572-003-0271-4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bonuso E, Zambonelli A, Bergemann S, Iotti M, Garbelotto M: Multilocus phylogenetic and coalescent analyses identify two cryptic species in the Italian bianchetto truffle,Tuber borchiiVittad. Conserv Genet. 2010, 11: 1453-1466. 10.1007/s10592-009-9972-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Frignani F: Analisi floristico-vegetazionale delle tartufaie sperimentali situate in Toscana ed Emilia Romagna. -[ >Risultati > Analisi floristiche - vegetazionali > Emilia Romagna e Toscana]

  37. 37.

    Ciaschetti G: Analisi floristico-vegetazionale delle tartufaie sperimentali situate in Abruzzo ed in Molise. -[ > Risultati > Analisi floristiche - vegetazionali > Abruzzo – Molise]

  38. 38.

    Gardin L, Paolanti M: Le caratteristiche dei suoli delle tartufaie naturali oggetto di sperimentazione nel progetto MAGNATUM. -[ >Risultati > Analisi pedologiche > Emilia Romagna e Toscana]

  39. 39.

    White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J: Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocol: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Edited by: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. 1990, Academic, S. Diego, 315-322.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Corpet F: Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16: 10881-10890. 10.1093/nar/16.22.10881.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ: Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology. Edited by: Krawetz S, Misener S. 2000, Humana Press, Totowa, 365-386.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was financially supported by the Tuscany, Emilia Romagna, Abruzzo and Molise regions (project MAGNATUM - Monitoraggio delle Attività di Gestione delle tartufaie NAturali di TUber Magnatum). The project MAGNATUM was coordinated by ARSIA (Agenzia Regionale per lo Sviluppo e L’Innovazione nel settore Agricolo-forestale) of Tuscany region. The Authors would like to thank Dr Ian Hall for the critical reading of the introduction and discussion sections and Dr. Enrico Lancellotti for the helpful suggestions concerning statistical analyses. We are grateful to the Dr. Claudia Perini and the Prof Giovanni Pacioni for the local coordination of this research.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Zambonelli.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MI participated in the design of the study, perfected the DNA extraction method, processed and analysed Emilia Romagna and Tuscany samples, performed Real Time analyses and helped to draft the manuscript. ML contributed in coordination of the study and helped in processing Molise and Abruzzo samples. MO processed and analysed Molise and Abruzzo samples. ES participated in processing Tuscany samples and carried out the statistical analyses. EB helped to perform Real Time analyses and to analyse the data. AZ participated in the study conception and coordination and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iotti, M., Leonardi, M., Oddis, M. et al. Development and validation of a real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of Tuber magnatum in soil. BMC Microbiol 12, 93 (2012).

Download citation


  • Real-time PCR
  • Taq-man probe
  • Tuber magnatum DNA concentration
  • Soil DNA extraction
  • ITS primers
  • Truffle production