Bacterial aromatic polyketides are a pharmacologically important group of natural products synthesized by type II polyketide synthases (type II PKSs) in actinobacteria. Isolation of novel aromatic polyketides from microbial sources is currently impeded because of the lack of knowledge about prolific taxa for polyketide synthesis and the difficulties in finding and optimizing target microorganisms. Comprehensive analysis of type II PKSs and the prediction of possible polyketide chemotypes in various actinobacterial genomes will thus enable the discovery or synthesis of novel polyketides in the most plausible microorganisms.
Description
We performed a comprehensive computational analysis of type II PKSs and their gene clusters in actinobacterial genomes. By identifying type II PKS subclasses from the sequence analysis of 280 known type II PKSs, we developed highly accurate domain classifiers for these subclasses and derived prediction rules for aromatic polyketide chemotypes generated by different combinations of type II PKS domains. Using 319 available actinobacterial genomes, we predicted 231 type II PKSs from 40 PKS gene clusters in 25 actinobacterial genomes, and polyketide chemotypes corresponding to 22 novel PKS gene clusters in 16 genomes. These results showed that the microorganisms capable of producing aromatic polyketides are specifically distributed within a certain suborder of Actinomycetales such as Catenulisporineae, Frankineae, Micrococcineae, Micromonosporineae, Pseudonocardineae, Streptomycineae, and Streptosporangineae.
Conclusions
We could identify the novel candidates of type II PKS gene clusters and their polyketide chemotypes in actinobacterial genomes by comprehensive analysis of type II PKSs and prediction of aromatic polyketides. The genome analysis results indicated that the specific suborders in actinomycetes could be used as prolific taxa for polyketide synthesis. The chemotype-prediction rules with the suggested type II PKS modules derived using this resource can be used further for microbial engineering to produce various aromatic polyketides. All these resources, together with the results of the analysis, are organized into an easy-to-use database PKMiner, which is accessible at the following URL: http://pks.kaist.ac.kr/pkminer. We believe that this web-based tool would be useful for research in the discovery of novel bacterial aromatic polyketides.
Background
Polyketides are a large family of secondary metabolites with diverse structures and biological activities. Many of these are clinically important compounds with antibiotic, antifungal, and anticancer properties [1]. Polyketide biosynthesis is catalyzed by a group of enzymes called polyketide synthases (PKSs). The carbon chain of polyketides is formed through stepwise decarboxylative condensation of acyl-thioester units by a coordinated group of PKS domains. The genes encoding PKS are usually clustered with their auxiliary and regulatory elements on the genome, and their products are classified into types I, II, and III depending on their domain organization [2].
Bacterial aromatic polyketides such as tetracyclines and actinorhodin are polycyclic phenolic compounds that are assembled by type II PKSs. A characteristic of type II PKSs is domain composition with a maximum of 2 domains in each type II PKS and the iterative use of domains to synthesize a polyketide product [3]. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram depicting the activity of type II PKS domains with actinorhodin biosynthesis as an example. Heterodimeric ketosynthase (KS) and chain length factor (CLF) domains catalyze chain initiation and elongation through decarboxylative condensation of malonyl building blocks, an acyl carrier protein (ACP) domain delivers malonyl building blocks to the KS-CLF, and a malonyl-CoA: ACP transacylase (MCAT) domain supplies malonyl groups to the ACP domain. The collective action of these type II PKS domains lead to the formation of highly reactive poly-β-keto intermediates. This nascent polyketide chain is modified into a specific folding pattern by tailoring enzyme domains, such as those of ketoreductase (KR), aromatase (ARO), and cyclase (CYC). The KR domain reduces carbonyl groups at a specific position of the polyketide chain, and the ARO and CYC domains control chain folding by catalyzing one or more regiospecific cyclization in the polyketide chain. Typical primary products of these type II PKSs are polyphenols that can be classified into 7 polyketide chemotypes: linear tetracyclines, anthracyclines, benzoisochromanequinones, tetracenomycins, aureolic acids, and angular angucyclines, as well as a group of pentagular polyphenols [4]. Additional modification by several elaborate tailoring enzymes such as dimerases, P450 monooxygenases, methyltransferases, and glycosyltransferases can further diversify phenolic polycyclic compounds such as actinorhodin [5].
Figure 1
Schematic diagram depicting the activity of type II PKS domains with actinorhodin biosynthesis as an example. Heterodimeric KS and CLF domains catalyze chain initiation and elongation through decarboxylative condensation of malonyl building blocks, an ACP domain delivers malonyl building blocks to the KS-CLF, and a MCAT domain supplies malonyl groups to the ACP domain. The collective action of these type II PKS domains lead to the formation of highly reactive poly-β-keto intermediates. This nascent polyketide chain is modified into a specific folding pattern by tailoring enzyme domains such as those of KR, ARO, and CYC. The KR domain reduces carbonyl group at a specific position of the polyketide chain, and the ARO and CYC domains control chain folding by catalyzing one or more regiospecific cyclization in the polyketide chain. Whereafter polyketide chain is modified by various tailoring enzymes into actinorhodin.
Currently, a vast majority of polyketides is derived from a single Actinomycetes genus, Streptomyces[6]. It is difficult to culture most microorganisms on earth that produce aromatic polyketides, under standard laboratory conditions because of their different growth rates and difficulties in laboratory manipulation [7]; this evidences the fact that there are a few aromatic polyketide producers and that the complete realm of these microorganisms remains to be explored. Furthermore, studies on type II PKSs and their polyketides have been performed on a limited number of genomes. However, the current progress of computational methods and substantial increase of genome sequencing data has created new possibilities to comprehensively characterize polyketide-producing genomes and increase the number of valuable resources in this field [8].
In order to discover novel aromatic polyketides based on genome mining, it is essential to comprehensively analyze various type II PKSs in different organisms to detect type II PKSs and analyze the correlation between domain organizations and polyketide structures. A number of experimental studies have explained in detail the biosynthetic functions of type II PKSs domains, which are encoded by a type II PKS gene cluster and have polyketide products, and most of the identified type II PKS domains are known to be conserved in related species; therefore, it is possible to discover new type II PKS domains on the basis of sequence similarities in homologous type II PKS domains. Furthermore, the comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of tailoring enzymes such as ARO and CYC provides details about their biosynthetic function in regulation of the metabolic pathway determining aromatic polyketide chemotypes [4]. This finding allows us to investigate the possibility of analyzing type II PKS domain compositions in type II PKS gene clusters with respect to aromatic polyketide chemotypes. Currently, there are several sequence-based polyketide gene cluster analysis systems for type I and type III PKSs, such as NRPS-PKS, ASMPKS, ClustScan, NP. Searcher, and antiSMASH [9–13]. Among these, antiSMASH is the only system that supports the analysis of type II PKS gene cluster. This system identifies gene clusters of type II PKS-specific domains such as KS, CLF, and ARO by using sequence-based classification. However, it is difficult to identify other type II PKSs and associate the gene cluster with the chemical structure of type II PKS products.
Here, we performed a comprehensive computational analysis of type II PKSs and their gene clusters in actinobacterial genomes. First, we carried out an exhaustive sequence analysis of known type II PKSs by using homology-based sequence clustering for the identification of type II PKS subclasses. This analysis enabled us to develop type II PKS domain classifiers and derive polyketide chemotype-prediction rules for the analysis of type II PKS gene cluster. Using these rules, we analyzed available actinobacterial genomes and predicted novel type II PKSs and PKS gene clusters together with potential bacterial aromatic polyketide chemotypes. The predicted type II PKS gene clusters were verified by using information from the available literature. All the resources, together with the results of the analysis, are organized into an easy-to-use database PKMiner, which is accessible at http://pks.kaist.ac.kr/pkminer.
Construction and content
Data sources
A total of 42 type II PKS gene clusters having type II PKS proteins were identified from individual literature and their sequence information was collected from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide database. A total of 37 bacterial aromatic polyketide chemotypes corresponding to type II PKS gene clusters were collected from literature and the NCBI pubchem database (see Additional file 1: Table S1).
To fully download completely sequenced genomes from the NCBI genome database, we made custom perl script using the NCBI E-utils based on actinobacteria taxonomy. As a result, we collected a total of 319 actinobacterial genome sequences. (see Additional file 1: Table S2).
Type II PKS identification
We identified a total of 280 known type II PKS proteins with functional activity from 42 aromatic polyketide gene clusters (see Additional file 1: Table S3). They include type II PKS classes such as keto synthase (KS), chain length factor (CLF), acyl carrier protein (ACP), keto reductase (KR), aromatase (ARO), cyclase (CYC), keto synthase III (KSIII), acyl CoA ligase (AL), acyl transferase (AT), malonyl-CoA: ACP transacylase (MCAT), and thioesterase (TE). We performed homology based clustering analysis for the sequences of each type II PKS class based on sequence similarity and biosynthetic function because several classes of type II PKSs such as KR, ARO and CYC have various different types of subclasses [4, 14] and the Pfam search tool [15] and the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) server of NCBI [16] often failed to identify domains in type II PKS protein sequences (see Additional file 1: Table S3). The sequences of each type II PKS class were grouped into clusters using the BLASTCLUST from the BLAST software package [17]. The number of cluster is determined when type II PKSs with different biosynthetic function were accurately separated. The subclasses determined by the sequence clustering analysis matched well with the known functional subclasses reported in literature for KR, ARO, and CYC. There was no evidence showing separate functional groups in KS III class yet but our analysis showed that the sequence-based subclasses of KS III have discriminating patterns as significant as the subclasses of other PKS domains. We maintain these subclasses of KS III as the potential subgroups of KS III in our study. We could confirm that the pattern of sequence conservation in C7 KR cluster is different from that of C9 KR cluster. We also could confirm that ARO clusters agreed well with previously known subgroups such as a monodomain and two didomain types. The N-terminal and C-terminal domain types of didomain aromatase and monodomain types of aromatases from literature are mapped to ARO subclasses a, b, and c, respectively [18]. In addition, CYC clusters well correspond to previously reported phylogenetic analysis result of type II PKS tailoring enzymes, which shows that the ring topology of aromatic polyketide correlates well with the types of cyclases [4]. As a result, we identified that 11 type II PKS classes were clustered into a total of 20 types of subclasses with distinct biosynthetic function and different average length of domain sequences as shown in Table 1 (see Additional file 1: Table S4).
Table 1
Result of homology based clustering analysis for 280 known type II PKSs
Domain
Subfamily
Biosynthetic function
Number of domains in each subfamily
Total number of domains
Average length
KS
a
Keto synthase
43
43
416
CLF
a
Chain length factor
43
43
407
ACP
a
Acyl carrier protein
44
44
78
KR
a
C9 ketoredution
25
30
214
b
C7 ketoredution
5
204
ARO
a
First and second ring cyclization in reduced chain of Ben, Ang, Tet and Ant
28
67
132
b
First and second ring cyclization in reduced chain of Ben, Ang, Tet and Ant
28
143
c
First and second ring cyclization in unreduced chain of Pen and Tet
For each of type II PKS domain, this table shows the subfamily, biosynthetic function, number of domains in each subfamily, total number of domains and the average length present in 280 known type II PKSs.
Construction of type II PKS domain classifiers
Type II PKS domain classifiers were developed for each type II PKS subclass using combination of hidden Markov Model (HMM) and sequence pairwise alignment based support vector machine (SVM) [19]. The profiled HMM of each type II PKS domain was trained with the sequences of the corresponding domain. HMM calculation was performed using the HMMER software package [20]. For the construction of SVM classifiers, we used the available software package libSVM [21] to implement SVM on our training datasets. The feature vector for SVM classifier was generated from the scores of pairwise sequence comparison by Smith-Waterman algorithm implemented in SSEARCH from the FASTA software package [22]. The SVM model of each domain subfamily was trained with the sequences of the training dataset. We performed training testing cycles using in-house PERL scripts. We used RBF kernel to train and test our SVM models. The parameter value C and r of kernel function were optimized on the training datasets by cross-validation. The best parameter set was determined when the product of sensitivity and specificity maximize the prediction accuracy. To evaluate the performance of each domain classifier, the following predictive performance measures were used: Sensitivity (SN) = TP/(TP + FN), Specificity (SP) = TN/(TN + FP), Accuracy (AC) = (TP + TN)/(TP + FP + TN + FN) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) = {(TP x TN) – (FN x FP)}/√(TP + FN) x (TN + FP) x (TP + FP) x (TN + FN) where TP, TN, FP and FN are true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative predictions, respectively. We took type II PKS domain subfamily sequences as the positive set and randomly selected sequences from non-type II PKS domains as the negative set. Depending on the dataset size, 4-fold cross-validation (n ≥ 20) or leave-one-out cross-validation (n < 20) were applied. The average of 10 repeated cross-validation results were used to calculate the performances.
Table 2 shows the results of evaluation of type II PKS domain classifiers. As shown in Table 2, the two types of domain classifiers show different domain classification accuracy. Among 15 type II PKS domain subfamilies, domain classifiers based on SVM outperformed that based on HMM for 12 type II PKS domain subfamilies. It indicates that classification performance of type II PKS domain could vary depending on the type of domain classifier. These domain classifiers remarkably show high classification accuracy. For 10 domain subfamilies, each domain classifier showing the higher performance reaches 100 % in classification accuracy. Therefore, we finally obtained high performance domain classifiers composed of profiled HMM and sequence pairwise alignment based SVM.
Table 2
Evaluation of type II PKS domain classifiers using profiled HMM and sequence pairwise alignment based SVM with 4- fold cross-validation (n > 20) and leave-one-out cross-validation (n < 20)
Derivation of prediction rules for aromatic polyketide chemotype
Since type II PKS subclasses can be identified correctly by clustering the sequence of type II PKS proteins, we attempted to identify correlation between type II PKS domain organization and aromatic polyketide chemotype. Previous study has suggested that the ring topology of aromatic polyketide correlates well with the types of cyclases [4]. We therefore examined domain combinations of type II PKS ARO and CYC by mapping these domain subfamilies onto aromatic polyketide chemotypes (see Additional file 1: Table S5)
Table 3 shows the results of the type II PKS ARO and CYC domain combinations corresponding to each aromatic polyketide chemotype. These results reveal that there are unique and overlapped domain combinations for six aromatic polyketide chemotypes. While angucyclines, anthracyclines, benzoisochromanequinones and pentangular polyphenols chemotypes have 7 unique ARO and CYC domain combinations, there are two pairs of overlapped ARO and CYC domain combinations between anthracyclines and tetracyclines/aureolic acids chemotypes and between pentangular polyphenols and tetracenomycins chemotypes. We thus attempted to derive aromatic polyketide chemotype-prediction rules based on the above results. However, the above results also show overlapped domain combinations between aromatic polyketide chemotypes, preventing accurate prediction of aromatic polyektide chemotype. We therefore integrated domain combinations with sequence homology for the prediction of aromatic polyketide chemotype, which is inspired from previous study showing that homologous type II PKS tailoring enzymes such as ARO and CYC tend to be clustered in the same clade of phylogenetic tree [4]. The aromatic polyketide chemotype classification rules based on domain combinations and sequence homology are as follows: 1) for type II PKS gene cluster mapped onto aromatic polyketide chemotype with unique domain combination, we assigned corresponding polyketide chemotype into type II PKS gene cluster. 2) for type II PKS gene cluster mapped onto aromatic polyketide chemotype with overlapped domain combination, we assigned the most abundant polyketide chemotype of homologs of ARO and CYC onto the type II PKS gene cluster.
Table 3
Type II PKS ARO/CYC domain combinations of aromatic polyketide chemotype
Polyketide Chemotype
Type II PKS domain subfamilies
Uniqueness
ARO_a
ARO_b
ARO_c
CYC_a
CYC_b
CYC_c
CYC_d
CYC_e
CYC_f
Angucyclines
√
√
√
√
Anthracyclines
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
x
√
√
√
Benzoisochromanequinones
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
Pentangular polyphenols
√
√
√
√
√
√
x
Tetracenomycins
√
√
√
x
Tetracyclines/aureolic acids
√
√
√
√
x
For each aromatic polyketide chemotype, this table shows ARO/CYC domain combinations of type II PKS gene clusters. The uniqueness column indicates whether or not type II PKS ARO/CYC domain combinations overlap between aromatic polyketide chemotypes.
Predicted type II PKS and aromatic polyketide chemotypes in actinobacterial genomes
319 currently available actinobacterial genomes were analyzed using type II PKS domain classifiers and aromatic polyketide chemotype-prediction rules. For the discovery of type II PKS gene clusters in genome sequence, both upstream and downstream predicted type II PKS sequences with pairwise distance less than 15,000 base pairs in genomic location were considered as clustered type II PKS genes. The type II PKS gene clusters with type II PKS KS and CLF domain were only chosen as valid type II PKS gene cluster candidates capable of producing aromatic polyketide.
Table 4 shows 231 type II PKSs in 40 type II PKS gene clusters for 25 actinobacterial genomes (see Additional file 1: Table S6). It exhibits that among 40 type II PKS gene clusters, 36 type II PKS gene clusters are classified into one of the six aromatic polyketide chemotypes. 4 type II PKS gene clusters remains unclassified polyketide chemotype because they have incomplete type II PKS domain composition in which aromatic polyketide chemotype could not be predicted. The distribution of predicted aromatic polyketide chemotype includes 4 types of aromatic polyketide chemotype such as angucyclines, anthracyclines, benzoisochromanequinones and pentangular polyphenols. Especially, it turns out that pentangular polyphenol is the most abundant polyketide chemotype predicted by the largest number of organisms. It also revealed type II PKS members that were so far not annotated as type II PKS. These type II PKS members all have single domain and are located within the gene cluster of other type II PKSs. These include 11 proteins that were marked as hypothetical or unknown function protein and 1 protein as modular polyketide synthase. Additionally we could confirm the proposed annotation of further 3 proteins that were marked as putative type II PKS.
Table 4
Microorganisms with type II PKS gene clusters from the analysis of 319 actinobacterial genomes
For each microorganism with type II PKS gene cluster, this table shows genome size, number of type II PKSs, predicted aromatic polyketide chemotype and reference.
To verify the results of our analysis, we have compared the type II PKS gene cluster with available literature information. It shows that 14 type II PKS gene clusters in 9 microbial organisms were reported in literature. However, there is no description for aromatic polyketide chemotype corresponding to type II PKS gene cluster except those in Steptomyces coelicolor A3(2), which are already included in our known type II PKSs. It also reveals that 16 microbial organisms are not currently reported as having type II PKS gene clusters. There were 22 novel type II PKS gene clusters for which the corresponding polyketide chemotypes could be predicted.
Database architecture
PKMiner was implemented on the relational database system MySQL. A custom-made parsers and modules in the backend were developed in Perl. The Web interface was designed and implemented using Perl and Asynchronous Javascript and XML (AJAX). AJAX was adopted for making Web pages more interactive without page reloading.
Utility
The browsing interface
All the results of our analysis were organized into easy-to-use database PKMiner as shown in Figure 2. PKMiner provides known type II PKSs identified from aromatic polyketide gene cluster and predicted type II PKSs resulted from genome analysis. User can explore detail information of aromatic polyketide, type II PKS and the results of genome analysis by clicking the button in detail column. Each entry in polyketide and genome is linked to detail information page of polyketides and genomes
Figure 2
The database interfaces: the browsing page, the polyketide page, and the genome page.
The search interface
The sequence-based search allows users to quickly find similar type II PKS to the query using type II PKS domain classifiers as shown in Figure 3. User can perform flexible homology search for type II PKS by designating sequence coverage and E-value of SSEARCH. The sequence coverage means the percentage of query sequence alignment to target sequence. The result page shows predicted type II PKS domains and homologs housed in PKMiner.
Figure 3
The search interfaces: the search page, and the search result page.
The genome mining interface
Genome mining interface provides two methods for the analysis of genome sequence. User can upload genome sequence in form of genbank or fasta format. User can also insert genbank accession instead of uploading genome sequence. In case of genome sequence in form of fasta format, PKMiner predict ORF from genome sequence using Glimmer trained with genome sequence of Steptomyces Coelicolor. After the analysis of genome sequences, user can examine and manipulate the result of our analysis through interactive analysis tools shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4
The genome mining interfaces: the genome mining page, and the genome mining result page.
Discussion
We have performed a comprehensive computational analysis of type II PKSs and their gene clusters for the identification of type II PKSs and the prediction of polyketide chemotypes in actinobacterial genomes. Even though subclasses of type II PKS have been inferred from the chemical structure of the aromatic polyketide, earlier studies have not specifically defined subclasses within type II PKS class based on their biosynthetic functions and sequence patterns. We solved this issues using homology based sequence clustering analysis of known type II PKSs. The results of this analysis showed that several type II PKS classes such as KR, ARO, CYC could be separated into type II PKS subclasses with different biosynthetic function. Furthermore, we could identify domain subfamilies of type II PKSs by using sequence patterns of type II PKS subclasses. These results imply that several type II PKS classes could be more sophisticatedly classified into subclasses based on patterns of domain sequences and various different types of aromatic polyketides are synthesized by different biosynthetic pathway catalyzed by type II PKS subclasses.
The identification of type II PKS subclasses enabled us to make prediction rules for aromatic polyketide chemotype corresponding to the combination of type II PKS domains. It has been known that aromatic polyketide is synthesized by various biosynthetic processes including starter unit selection, chain length determination, folding pattern determination, chain tailoring such as methylation, glycosylation and so on. Several previous studies have reported key factors by correlating individual type II PKS sequence with chemical structure of aromatic polyketide [30, 31]. Based on previous reports, we tried to deduce general rules applicable to our known type II PKSs for various biosynthetic processes of aromatic polyketide formation. However, we could only find correlation between ARO/CYC domain combination and carbon chain folding pattern for our known type II PKSs.
The development of type II PKS domain classifiers and derivation of prediction rule for aromatic polyketide chemotype allowed us to identify and analyze type II PKS gene cluster. It is important to predict aromatic polyketide chemotype by analyzing type II PKS gene cluster. The aromatic polyketide chemotype provides a framework to understand the type II PKS gene cluster within the known biosynthetic pathway. It also suggests the potential function of individual type II PKS in polyketide biosynthesis pathway. Furthermore, it provides a possibility to design novel aromatic polyketide by engineering the biosynthetic pathway through substitution of type II PKS.
The integration of the type II PKS domain classifiers with the chemotype-prediction rules leaded to development of PKMiner, which can detect type II PKS gene cluster, provides type II PKS functional annotation and predicts the polyketide chemotype of type II PKS product. Compared to previous software antiSMASH, the analysis functionalities described here are unique features in analyzing type II PKS gene cluster. Even though the antiSMASH provides various analysis functionalities such as gene cluster detection, function annotation, prediction of chemical structure, comparative gene cluster analysis and phylogenetic analysis, some of analysis functionalities such as gene cluster detection, comparative gene cluster analysis and phylogenetic analysis are only effective in analyzing type II PKS gene cluster because it lacks comprehensive type II PKS specific domain classifiers and aromatic polyketide structure prediction module.
Genome analysis and literature based validation showed that our method can be successfully applied to identify type II PKSs and predict aromatic polyketide chemotype by analyzing type II PKS gene clusters. Especially, it turns out that pentangular polyphenol is the most abundant polyketide chemotype predicted by the largest number of organisms. However, this approach has potential limitations in type II PKS domain identification and aromatic polyketide prediction. Because our domain classifiers and polyketide chemotype prediction rules always depend on known type II PKS information and type II PKS domain organization, it can miss some totally new types of PKS subclasses or failed to predict aromatic polyketide chemotype with novel domain combination for existing or novel aromatic polyketide chemotype. For example, 9 potential type II PKSs in Steptomyces avermitilis MA-4680 were reported based on their general similarity to type II PKSs, but these did not show distinguished sequence similarity to any of our type II PKS domains and their PKS activities have not been validated experimentally [27]. We consider including these type II PKSs into a separate domain subfamily group after their type II PKS activities are proved.
The result of genome analysis remains taxonomic characteristics of microorganisms with type II PSK gene clusters. We thus investigated taxonomic distribution for the above results in more detail. To estimate relative abundance of type II PKS containing genomes between different taxonomic groups, we calculated the ratio between the type II PKS containing genomes and total sequenced genomes in taxonomic hierarchy as a taxonomic group ratio. We chose the suborder as criteria taxon for calculating the taxonomic group ratio because it is known that microorganisms belonging to the order Actinomycetales are fascinatingly diverse. Currently, 319 actinobacterial genomes are classified into 6 orders, 17 suborders and 41 families in the NCBI taxonomy. Table 5 shows taxonomic distribution of microorganisms with type II PKS gene clusters. For each of the different suborders, Table 5 shows total number of sequenced genomes, the number of type II PKS containing genomes and the taxonomic group ratio. As can be seen, type II PKS containing genomes exhibited certain taxon-specific distribution. The microorganisms with type II PKS containing genomes are only included in the suborder Catenulisporineae, Frankineae, Micrococcineae, Micromonosporineae, Pseudonocardineae, Streptosporangineae and Streptosporangineae. Interestingly, the taxonomic PKS group ratio shows that the microorganisms included in suborder Frankineae, Micromonosporineae, Streptosporangineae and Streptosporangineae have relatively high proportion type II PKS containing genomes, whereas microorganisms included in the suborder Actinomycineae,Corynebacterineae, Glycomycineae, Kineosporiineae and Propionibacterineae does not have any type II PKS gene clusters. Remarkably, the suborder Streptosporangineae which includes genus Steptomyces known as prolific taxa for polyketide synthesis is not top rank suborder in taxonomic group ratio. This result suggests that there exist other aromatic polyketide prolific sources besides Streptosporangineae.
Table 5
Taxonomical distribution of microorganisms with type II PKS gene clusters
Order
Suborder
# of sequenced genome
# of genomes with type II PKSs
Taxonomic PKS group ratio (%)
Acidimicrobiales
Acidimicrobineae
1
0
0.00
Actinomycetales
Actinomycineae
4
0
0.00
Actinomycetales
Catenulisporineae
1
1
100.00
Actinomycetales
Corynebacterineae
129
0
0.00
Actinomycetales
Frankineae
11
6
54.55
Actinomycetales
Glycomycineae
1
0
0.00
Actinomycetales
Kineosporiineae
3
0
0.00
Actinomycetales
Micrococcineae
48
1
2.08
Actinomycetales
Micromonosporineae
7
5
71.43
Actinomycetales
Propionibacterineae
12
0
0.00
Actinomycetales
Pseudonocardineae
11
2
18.18
Actinomycetales
Streptomycineae
36
6
16.67
Actinomycetales
Streptosporangineae
7
4
57.14
Bifidobacteriales
Bifidobacteriaceae
40
0
0.00
Coriobacteriales
Coriobacterineae
6
0
0.00
Rubrobacterales
Rubrobacterineae
1
0
0.00
Solirubrobacterales
Conexibacteraceae
1
0
0.00
For each suborder, this table shows the number of sequence genomes, number of genomes with type II PKSs and taxonomic PKS group ratio. The taxonomic PKS group ratio represents the proportion of the type II PKS containing genomes to total sequenced genomes in the suborder.
Conclusion
We performed a comprehensive computational analysis of type II PKSs and their gene clusters in actinobacterial genomes. We have developed type II PKS domain classifiers and derived aromatic polyketide chemotype-prediction rules for the analysis of type II PKS gene clusters observed in bacterial genomes. These rules were effective in identifying novel candidates of type II PKS gene clusters and their possible polyketide chemotypes in the available actinobacterial genome sequences. The results of this analysis gave new insights about the distribution of aromatic polyketide chemotypes that can be produced by actinomycetes. This resource can be similarly applied for the analysis of any other known or newly sequenced microorganisms. Furthermore, our tools and the results of this analysis have a potential to be used in microbial engineering to produce various aromatic polyketides by combining the suggested type II PKS modules for the specific aromatic polyketides.
This research was supported by the KAIST High Risk High Return Project (HRHRP).This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2012-0001001).
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Department of Information and Communications Engineering, KAIST
Shen B: Polyketide biosynthesis beyond the type I, II and III polyketide synthase paradigms. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2003, 7: 285-95. 10.1016/S1367-5931(03)00020-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hertweck C, Luzhetskyy A, Rebets Y, Bechthold A: Type II polyketide synthases: gaining a deeper insight into enzymatic teamwork. Nat Prod Rep. 2007, 24: 162-90. 10.1039/b507395m.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Fritzsche K, Ishida K, Hertweck C: Orchestration of discoid polyketide cyclization in the resistomycin pathway. J Am Chem Soc. 2008, 130: 8307-16. 10.1021/ja800251m.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Rix U, Fischer C, Remsing LL, Rohr J: Modification of post-PKS tailoring steps through combinatorial biosynthesis. Nat Prod Rep. 2002, 19: 542-80. 10.1039/b103920m.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Pace NR: A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science. 1997, 276: 734-40. 10.1126/science.276.5313.734.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Nett M, Ikeda H, Moore BS: Genomic basis for natural product biosynthetic diversity in the actinomycetes. Nat Prod Rep. 2009, 26: 1362-84. 10.1039/b817069j.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ansari MZ, Yadav G, Gokhale RS, Mohanty D: NRPS-PKS: a knowledge-based resource for analysis of NRPS/PKS megasynthases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: W405-13. 10.1093/nar/gkh359.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tae H, Kong EB, Park K: ASMPKS: an analysis system for modular polyketide synthases. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007, 8: 327-10.1186/1471-2105-8-327.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Starcevic A, Zucko J, Simunkovic J, Long PF, Cullum J, Hranueli D: ClustScan: an integrated program package for the semi-automatic annotation of modular biosynthetic gene clusters and in silico prediction of novel chemical structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: 6882-92. 10.1093/nar/gkn685.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Chang CCL, CJ: Training nu-support vector classifiers: theory and algorithms. Neural Comput. 2001, 9: 1443-1471.Google Scholar
Pearson WR, Lipman DJ: Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988, 85: 2444-8. 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Zhao W, Zhong Y, Yuan H, Wang J, Zheng H, Wang Y, Cen X, Xu F, Bai J, Han X, Lu G, Zhu Y, Shao Z, Yan H, Li C, Peng N, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Lin W, Fan Y, Qin Z, Hu Y, Zhu B, Wang S, Ding X, Zhao GP: Complete genome sequence of the rifamycin SV-producing Amycolatopsis mediterranei U32 revealed its genetic characteristics in phylogeny and metabolism. Cell Res. 2010, 20: 1096-108. 10.1038/cr.2010.87.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Udwary DW, Gontang EA, Jones AC, Jones CS, Schultz AW, Winter JM, Yang JY, Beauchemin N, Capson TL, Clark BR, Esquenazi E, Eustáquio AS, Freel K, Gerwick L, Gerwick WH, Gonzalez D, Liu WT, Malloy KL, Maloney KN, Nett M, Nunnery JK, Penn K, Prieto-Davo A, Simmons TL, Weitz S, Wilson MC, Tisa LS, Dorrestein PC, Moore BS: Significant natural product biosynthetic potential of actinorhizal symbionts of the genus frankia, as revealed by comparative genomic and proteomic analyses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011, 77: 3617-25. 10.1128/AEM.00038-11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Penn K, Jenkins C, Nett M, Udwary DW, Gontang EA, McGlinchey RP, Foster B, Lapidus A, Podell S, Allen EE, Moore BS, Jensen PR: Genomic islands link secondary metabolism to functional adaptation in marine Actinobacteria. ISME J. 2009, 3: 1193-203. 10.1038/ismej.2009.58.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Udwary DW, Zeigler L, Asolkar RN, Singan V, Lapidus A, Fenical W, Jensen PR, Moore BS: Genome sequencing reveals complex secondary metabolome in the marine actinomycete Salinispora tropica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104: 10376-81. 10.1073/pnas.0700962104.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Omura S, Ikeda H, Ishikawa J, Hanamoto A, Takahashi C, Shinose M, Takahashi Y, Horikawa H, Nakazawa H, Osonoe T, Kikuchi H, Shiba T, Sakaki Y, Hattori M: Genome sequence of an industrial microorganism Streptomyces avermitilis: deducing the ability of producing secondary metabolites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 12215-20. 10.1073/pnas.211433198.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bentley SD, Chater KF, Cerdeño-Tárraga AM, Challis GL, Thomson NR, James KD, Harris DE, Quail MA, Kieser H, Harper D, Bateman A, Brown S, Chandra G, Chen CW, Collins M, Cronin A, Fraser A, Goble A, Hidalgo J, Hornsby T, Howarth S, Huang CH, Kieser T, Larke L, Murphy L, Oliver K, ONeil S, Rabbinowitsch E, Rajandream MA, Rutherford K, Rutter S, Seeger K, Saunders D, Sharp S, Squares R, Squares S, Taylor K, Warren T, Wietzorrek A, Woodward J, Barrell BG, Parkhill J, Hopwood DA: Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Nature. 2002, 417: 141-7. 10.1038/417141a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki S, Hiratsu K, Suwa M, Ishii T, Sugino F, Yamada K, Kinashi H: The large linear plasmid pSLA2-L of Streptomyces rochei has an unusually condensed gene organization for secondary metabolism. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 48: 1501-10. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03523.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Keatinge-Clay AT, Maltby DA, Medzihradszky KF, Khosla C, Stroud RM: An antibiotic factory caught in action. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004, 11: 888-93. 10.1038/nsmb808.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tang Y, Tsai SC, Khosla C: Polyketide chain length control by chain length factor. J Am Chem Soc. 2003, 125: 12708-9. 10.1021/ja0378759.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
