Skip to main content
Download PDF

Investigation into the prevalence of enterotoxin genes and genetic background of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from retain foods in Hangzhou, China

BMC Microbiology volume 23, Article number: 294 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Staphylococcus aureus expresses numerous toxins, many of which are strongly believed to be responsible for specific symptoms and even diseases, making it significant in the pathogenesis of human health. Enterotoxins, which are vital toxins, are associated with foodborne illnesses that manifest through symptoms like vomiting and diarrhea. In the present study, 264 S. aureus isolates obtained from various retail foods in Hangzhou, China were further investigated the profiles of enterotoxin genes and genetic backgrounds.

Results

Approximately, 64.02% of the isolates from diverse sources contained at least one Staphylococcal Enterotoxin (SE) genes, displaying a total of 36 distinct combinations. Enterotoxin gene cluster (egc) encoded enterotoxin genes, normally designated by seg, sei, sem, sen, seo and selu, plus with sep were more frequently detected (33.73%, each). In contrast, see, ses and set were absent in any of the isolates tested. A total of 44 sequence types (STs), 20 clonal complexes (CCs) and 66 different staphylococcal protein A (spa) types (including six novel types) were identified among those 169 SE-positive isolates. Moreover, nineteen methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates were identified. The majority of those isolates belonged to the CC59-Sccmec IVa cluster and carried the seb-sek-seq gene cluster. The egc cluster, either coexisting with or without other enterotoxin genes, was observed in all isolates allocated into CC5, CC9, CC20, CC25, CC72 and ST672. Irrespective of the spa types and origins of the food, it appeared that seh was a distinct genetic element present in isolates belonging to the CC1 clonal lineage.

Conclusions

The results not only proposed a suspected relationship between distribution of enterotoxigenic strains and genetic backgrounds, but also attributed the presence of novel enterotoxins to potential hazards in food safety.

Peer Review reports

Background

Staphylococcus aureus, an important bacterial pathogen in terms of human health, is responsible for a diverse array of infections, encompassing simple skin and soft tissue infections, as well as fetal septicaemia and osteomyelitis [1,2,3]. Staphylococcal food poisoning (SFP) is a common form of intoxication characterized by symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain [4]. It occurs when food items contaminated with S. aureus containing enough amounts of one or more enterotoxins [5, 6]. The illness is typically self-limiting in 1–3 days, but it can occasionally be serious, particularly in infants, the elderly and those with compromised immune systems [7]. Staphylococcus aureus is a prominent bacterial species known for its production of enterotoxins, causing numerous cases of foodborne illnesses globally [8,9,10,11,12]. It was estimated that more than 240,000 foodborne outbreaks per year was due to S. aureus in the United States alone [13]. From 2010 to 2020, S. aureus was found to be one of the leading pathogenic microorganisms in China, responsible for causing 577 outbreaks, 9092 cases of illness, 3715 hospitalizations and 2 death [14]. However, considering most cases of SFP experience self-recovery without hospitalization, the number of SFP cases may have been underestimated.

Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs), a superfamily of extracellular proteins with similar structures and functions, are often found to be responsible for SFP due to their robust tolerance to heat, low pH as well as their ability to withstand most proteolytic enzymes [6]. So far, more than 18 new types of SEs have been reported in addition to the five traditional enterotoxins (SEA ~ SEE) [6, 7]. Enterotoxins that failed to exhibit emetic activity or had not been evaluated in non-human primate models were classified as Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-like proteins (SEls), including SElJ, SElU, SElV, SElW, SElX and SElZ [6].

The majority of genes encoding SEs and SEls were located on mobile genetic elements (MGEs), while some of them appeared to coexist on plasmids, prophages, pathogenicity islands (SaPIs) and variable genetic islands. Genes encoding virulence factors and antibiotic resistance on MGEs can undergo horizontal transfer within S. aureus, thereby altering its pathogenicity and accelerating the genetic evolution of the strains in both animals and human hosts. Therefore, investigating the distribution of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes and MGEs would be advantageous in tracing the epidemiological origins and understanding the occurrence of virulence.

Various foods, particularly those containing starch and protein, have been reported to be vulnerable to be contaminated by S. aureus and subsequently SEs. Consequently, outbreaks of SFP have consistently been regional differences [6]. In this study, we evaluated the enterotoxin potential, especially the distribution of new SEs/SEls, together with the genetic diversity of S. aureus isolated from meat, milk, starch foods and fresh fruits/vegetables in Hangzhou, China, to probe into the possible relationship between the distribution of enterotoxin-coding genes and the genetic background of the strains.

Results

Prevalence and origins of S. aureus

Of the 2969 retail food samples, a total of 264 isolates, comprising 117 isolates (13.03%) from raw meat products, 85 isolates (9.22%) from cooked products, 50 isolates (7.04%) from starch foods, 10 isolates (6.33%) from drink, and 2 isolates (0.71%) from milk/milk products (seen in Table 1), were tested positive for S. aureus and further detected PCR of nuc gene. Moreover, among the 169 chosen isolates that exhibited SE positivity, a total of 19 isolates were identified as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) due to the presence of the mecA gene.

Table 1 Prevalence of S. aureus isolates in retail foods in Hangzhou
Full size table

Enterotoxin gene profiles of S. aureus

Out of the 264 isolates analyzed, 169 of them (64.02%) harbored at least one enterotoxigenic gene. These isolates formed 36 distinct combinations (Table 2), with 4 of them carrying more than 10 SE genes. Only the isolates from vegetables and fruits had a lowest percentage of SE genes (6/18, 33.3%). The frequencies of every enterotoxin gene were presented in Fig. 1. The encoding genes for Enterotoxin E, S and T were not detected in all isolates. The most frequently detected genes were the Staphylococcal enterotoxin gene sep and egc-encoding genes, each found in 33.73% of the isolates. sey was detected in 22.49% of the isolates, followed by sel in 11.57%. The abundance of classical SE genes, including sea (11.24%), seb (14.79%), sec (16.57%) and sed (1.18%), which have frequently been linked to SFP outbreaks, was comparatively lower than that of many other newly discovered SEs or SEls. Notably, the most common combination of enterotoxin-encoding genes was seg + sei + sem + sen + seo + selu, accounting for 13.61% (23/169). There was no statistically significant difference among the catalog of food items in terms of the number of enterotoxin genes detected.

Table 2 Clonal Complexes, MLST, spa types and SE gene profiles of the enterotoxin-positive S. aureus isolates
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of the Staphylococcal toxin genes of S. aureus isolated from retail foods

Full size image

Molecular typing of SE-positive S. aureus

Using the Multi-locus Sequence Typing Method, a total of 169 SE-positive S. aureus isolates were identified. These isolates were classified into 44 sequence types (STs), which were further grouped into 20 clonal complexes (CCs) and 3 singletons (refer to Table 2) based on eBURST analysis. Two isolates 18–57 and 20–38 were assigned new STs (ST7562 and 7563) after registrations to the MLST database. The most frequently detected STs was ST7 (39/169, 23.08%), followed by ST59 (14/169, 8.28%). The study followed ST1 and ST6, with each accounting for 7.10% (12 out of 169). ST5 and ST25 were detected at a rate of 4.73% each (seen in Table 2). 66 different spa types including six novel spa types (t20421, t20422, t20424, t20425, t20426, t20441) that were not listed in the Ridom StaphType database, were found among those 169 S. aureus isolates. t091 was the most prevalent spa type, accounting for 38 out of 169 isolates (22.49%). t164 and t701 accounted for 11 isolates each out of 169 (6.51% each), respectively. t437 accounted for 10 out of 169 (5.92%). Combining the STs and spa types, ST7 - t091 was the predominant molecular types (32/169, 18.93%) of all isolates, whereas ST59 - t437 was the most frequently detected among MRSA isolates. The majority of isolates showed low consistency between MLST and spa types in this study. For example, 39 isolates belonged to the same ST7 but were divided into five different spa types (t091, t1943, t796, t867, t20241). Meanwhile, some strains had the same spa type but diverse MLST types (t164, t954, t189) and were associated with different Clonal Complex (CC20-t164, CC5-t954, CC188-t189).

The relatedness among the strains was further examined by constructing a phylogenetic tree based on the seven-allelic combinations of MLST (Fig. 2.). All STs were divided into three distinct cladograms (named as A, B and C). Cladogram A was a complex composition, including CC1 (ST1, ST2990, ST1920, ST493, ST573, ST848, ST5881), CC188 (ST188, ST7562), CC9 (ST9, ST2423), CC25 (ST25, ST2797), CC59 (ST59), CC20 (ST20, ST1921, ST1281, ST2631) and some relevant single-locus variant, and the most relevant Clonal Complex 1 occupied the vast majority. Cladogram B contained CC5 (ST5, ST965, ST950, ST2144, ST7563, ST6427), CC6 (ST6, ST1551) and CC88 (ST88). Cladogram C consisted of CC7 (ST7, ST943, ST7063, ST4367), CC72 (ST72, ST544) and CC8 (ST630, ST2416).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Minimum spanning tree of MLST types for 169 enterotoxin-positive S. aureus isolates. Each circle represents one ST, the size of which accounts for the numbers of strains with the same ST, while the gray zones around some STs means that these genotypes belong to the same clonal complex

Full size image

Discussion

Quite a few studies had investigated the proportion of enterotoxigenic genes in various kinds of food and clinical samples, particularly in light of increased awareness of the risks associated with emerging novel types of SEs and SEls. However, the genetic background and information of SE-positive S. aureus strains circulating through food chain in Hangzhou City is limited. In this study, 64.2% (169/264) isolates from different retail foods harbored one or more se/sel genes, averaging three genes per isolate. The distribution of individual enterotoxin genes varied among previous articles mainly due to their diverse geographical locations. However, approximately 50–80% of isolates carried at least one se/sel gene [15,16,17], which was consistent with our results. The most frequently occurred genes were sep, seg, sei, sem, sen, seo and selu (33.79%, each) in our study. Higher The prevalence of egc in food- and clinic-derived S. aureus isolates has been increasingly common in recent years, with prevalence rates ranging from 50% to a staggering 97.8% [18,19,20,21]. The significance of egc enterotoxins in terms of food safety has been highlighted, as there have been reports of S. aureus harboring egc enterotoxin genes without producing classical SEs in Japan, USA, Switzerland, Romania [6, 22, 23]. Recently, we described a foodborne outbreak due to S. aureus (new sequence type 7591) harboring egc-related genes in the absence of any classical SEs in China firstly [Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Oct;135:132-135]. Moreover, a total of five S. aureus strains (18–98, 19–39, 20–33, 20–34, 20–106) in this study showed identical SmaI-digested PFGE dendrograms with those in SFP and all of them were assigned to CC72 with different but pretty close spa types. A phylogenetic tree of these CC72 isolates based on the results of Whole-genome sequencing indicated a close genetic background between them. The high prevalence of egc in clinical isolates supported the hypothesis that egc may provide a selective advantage during infection [24] and play an important role in long-term persistence in the infant gut [25]. As foods commonly serve as a reservoir for clinical S. aureus, investigation of their prevalence and emergence of enterotoxin genes was of great importance.

The enterotoxin gene cluster (egc), an operon encoding a variety of se/sel genes, was initially discovered to comprise seg, sei, sem, sen, seo and two pseudogenes (Ψent1 and Ψent2) [24, 26]. Subsequent to that, the composition and organization of the egc loci can vary due to random duplication, removal, or further variation, resulting in six general groups (egc1 to 6) [27]. All isolates carrying the egc cluster consisted of the universally present six genes, with or without any other enterotoxin genes. selu was suspected to be undectable due to its uncertain emetic activity in some studies. What’s more, the egc cluster was observed in all CC5, CC9, CC20, CC25, CC72 and ST672, but occasionally present in CC1, all of which (except for ST672) were reported in other previous studies but with various spa types [28,29,30]. These data suggested that a close connection between the egc cluster and the clonal genetic background. Differentiating the polymorphism of egc loci and further analysis of genetic location will be the next direction of our work.

Mobile genetic Elements (MGEs) are a collection of sizable, mobile DNA segments that serve as a reservoir for antibiotic genes. Moreover, they also function as the breeding ground for enterotoxin genes, leading to a non-random distribution of these genes in various individual studies.

S. aureus pathogenicity islands (SaPIs) are found to be widespread in S. aureus, and potentially in other Staphylococcus species. These islands contain various virulence genes such as SE- and SE-like genes, biofilm-associated genes, and genes responsible for drug resistance and host range [31, 32]. To date, six types of superantigen genes, which include seb, sec, sek, sel, seq and tst (firstly designed as sef) were found to present on SaPIs and always exist in varying combinations [33,34,35,36]. Examples of SaPI bov1, SaPI m1/n1, SaPI 6811 and SaPI J50 show the presence of tst either with seq and sek or without any toxin genes. In both SaPI 5 and SaPI j11, sek and seq were simultaneously detected. Additionally, in SaPI 3, sek and seq were found to coexisted with seb. Intriguingly, the presence of seb was also detected in uncommon SaPIs, like SaPI vm10, SaPI ishikawa11, SaPI ivm60, SaPI no10, SaPI hirosaki4, SaPI NN54 and SaPI PM1 [35, 37]. Based on the presence of enterotoxin genes on SaPIs, sec and sel, as well as seq and sek, could be separate combinations, which aligns with the findings of our study. Sixteen isolates carrying sec and sel without tst gene could potentially contain SaPI mw2. Two isolates harboring sek and seq without sea, seb or tst gene were suspected to have either SaPI 5 or SaPI j11. Identifying the specific SaPIs of the latest isolates with the sec-sel and sek-seq genotype solely based on the PCR results of SE profiles proved to be challenging. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that the S. aureus genome may contain one or more SaPIs [38, 39], which contributed to increased uncertainty. Whole genome sequencing, comprehensive nucleotide fragment analyses, or other low-cost and time-saving method (for example, LA-PCR based SaPI scanning) [35] are needed to comprehensively analyze the diversity of SaPIs in our future work.

The putative transposase gene, seh, has been reported to be located at immediately downstream of the type IV Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Element (SCCmec) and is responsible for stabilizing the integration of SCCmec IV [40, 41]. In this study, 3 of 15 isolates that tested positive for seh were assigned to ST1-t114-SCCmec IVg and co-expressed sec-sel-tst-sek-seq genes. Notably, this strain was implicated in causing SFP in China during 2014–2016, underscoring the significance of monitoring the presence of S. aureus in the food supply chain [42]. Among them, the genotype ST1-t127 (6/15) was also prevalent in China and other countries [29, 43, 44], indicating that it would be the main genotype of CC1 [44]. Remarkably, the presence of the seh gene was found to be associated with CC1 irrespective of the spa types and food origins (Table 2). This observation was consistent with prior research findings [44,45,46].

MRSA has emerged as a formidable and life-threatening pathogen since its first appearance in 1961, primarily due to its variable resistance to multiple drugs [47]. The prevalence of MRSA in food, particularly in meat and meat products, has shown an upward trend over the past decade [48,49,50,51].This study identified 19 MRSA isolates through detecting mecA gene, which belonged to five kinds of clonal complexes, namely CC1, CC5, CC9, CC59 and CC88. These clonal complexes have been previously reported and have identical profiles of enterotoxin genes [44, 46]. ST59-t437 MRSA isolates were the most frequent type identified in our study, supported by the consistent genetic information obtained from previous isolates found in food and hospitalized patients in China [44, 52, 53]. It was noted that MRSA isolates belonged to ST59 but allocated to other spa types were identified. Except for t16156, t3523, t3527 and t3590 had only one spa repeat difference from t437. Thus, it can be assumed that these strains emerged from the ancestor t437-ST59 through tandem deficiency and insertion. All ST59 isolates carried SCCmec IVa, sek, and seq, with occasional presence of sea and pvl. Previous studies in molecular epidemiology have demonstrated that CC59- SCCmec IV- t437 clone was the prevailing lineage of CA-MRSA in China and Vietnam [54]. The relatively high prevalence of CC59-t437 and its closely related MRSA lineage in our study suggested that food-origin SCCmec IVa-MRSA was probably to be the primary source of CA-MRSA in China, specifically in the city of Hangzhou.

This study was the first systematic surveillance of S. aureus isolated from foods in the city of Hangzhou, in which the genetic background of the SE-positive strains were determined. However, the study was conducted in local regions, which may not provide a complete representation of the potential enterotoxigenic S. aureus from food chain. Therefore, further research should be conducted to comprehensively evaluate the prevalence and genetic features of SE-positive S. aureus, including other cities and other food sources.

Conclusion

In summary, our present study illustrated the distribution of enterotoxin genes and the genetic background diversity of S. aureus isolated from various food products being sold in Hangzhou, China. A total of 64.02% of S. aureus isolates were found to carry one or more SE/SEl genes and they were allocated into 44 sequence types and 66 different spa types. Our results verified the simultaneous occurrence of sec-sel, sek-seq, sed-sej and seg-sei-sem-sen-seo-selu regardless of the tandem variants. Notably, some special SE-positive S. aureus assigned to same CCs had a certain profile of enterotoxin genes, indicating the utility and discriminatory power of MLST as a molecular tool for estimating the presence of potential SE genes and their related clusters.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

A total of 2969 food samples, purchased from local markets in 15 districts of Hangzhou over a three-year period (January 2018 to December 2020), were randomly collected for S. aureus isolation. Collected samples were tightly sealed with sterile plastic wrap, stored in a cold box below 4 ℃, transported to accredited laboratory, and analyzed microbiologically within 24 hours. The tested food samples were divided into 5 categories, i.e., raw meat products (fresh beef, pork, mutton, duck and chicken samples), cooked products (processed meat products, ready-to-eat vegetables, soybean products, egg products and seafood), starch food products (sandwiches and traditional Chinese pastries), milk (cartons of milk sold on the supermarkets) and drinks (fresh juice and tea).

Isolation and identification of S. aureus

The qualitative test for S. aureus in food samples was performed in accordance with GB 4789.10–2016, which is the National Food Safety Standard of China for the examination of S. aureus in food [55]. Briefly, approximately 25 g/ml of food items, added with 225 ml Tryptic Soy Broth supplemented with 7.5% NaCl (Huankai, Guangdong, China), were homogenized before incubation at 37 ℃ for 18–24 h. A loopful of the enriched cultured medium were transferred to blood agar plates and Baird-Parker plates for another 24–48 h. Putative S. aureus clone with a black color on BP plates or a clear hemolysis ring in blood agar plates was tested for coagulase activity test and further confirmed by the Vitek 2 compact system (bioMerieux, Marcy-1’Etoile, France). Furthermore, all the isolates were identified to the species level by PCR for the nuc gene.

Detection of Staphylococcal enterotoxin genes

Total bacterial DNA was extracted from 1 ml cultured MH broth (Huankai, Guangdong, China) of isolates using the DNase Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany) under the guidelines of the manufacturer. PCR method was conducted for all isolates to determine the presence of genes encoding 22 staphylococcal enterotoxins plus TSST. PCR procedures and the visualization of amplicons were performed as described in our earlier published research [56]. The positive control for nuc genes was Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923, while S. epidermidis ATCC12228 served as negative controls. Positive controls for toxin genes included the following strains: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC8095 (sea, sed, selj, sek, seq, and ser gene), Staphylococcus aureus ATCC14458 (seb gene), Staphylococcus aureus ATCC19015 (sec gene), Staphylococcus aureus ATCC27644 (see gene), Staphylococcus aureus 19–39 (sec, sel, tsst, seg, sei, sem, sen, seo and selu genes), Staphylococcus aureus 19–52 (seh, seq, sek gene), and Staphylococcus aureus 18–66 (sep gene), Staphylococcus aureus 18 − 11 (sey gene). Staphylococcus aureus strains 18 − 11, 18–66, 19–39, and 19–52 were isolated in this study and subjected to whole genome sequencing.

Multi locus sequence typing and spa typing

Primer spa-1113f (5’-TAA AGA CGA TCC TTC GGT GAG C-3’) and spa-1514r (5’-CAG CAG TAG TGC CGT TTG CTT-3’) were used for the polymorphic X region of spa gene. MLST scanning was based on the sequences of the following seven housekeeping genes: arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi and yqiL. The PCR amplification conditions were described at previous study [15]. Sequence type (ST) was determined by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme and assigned to clonal complex (CC), according to the PubMLST (https:/pubmlst.org/organisms/ staphylococcus aureus). The clonal complex (CC) analysis was determined using the eBURST algorithm [57]. The spa types were assigned on the Spa Server Website (http://spaserver2.ridom.de/). The minimum spanning tree (MST) was constructed with Bionumerics 8.0 software (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray S, et al. Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA. 2007;298(15):1763–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rasigade JP, Dumitrescu O, Lina G. New epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(7):587–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG Jr.. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):603–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Le Loir Y, Baron F, Gautier M. Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning. Genet Mol Res. 2003;2(1):63–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Asao T, Kumeda Y, Kawai T, Shibata T, Oda H, Haruki K, et al. An extensive outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning due to low-fat milk in Japan: estimation of enterotoxin A in the incriminated milk and powdered skim milk. Epidemiol Infect. 2003;130(1):33–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher EL, Otto M, Cheung GYC. Basis of Virulence in Enterotoxin-Mediated Staphylococcal Food Poisoning. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:436.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Argudin MA, Mendoza MC, Rodicio MR. Food poisoning and Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins. Toxins (Basel). 2010;2(7):1751–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. White AE, Tillman AR, Hedberg C, Bruce BB, Batz M, Seys SA, et al. Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Reported to National Surveillance, United States, 2009–2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28(6):1117–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Park MS, Kim YS, Lee SH, Kim SH, Park KH, Bahk GJ. Estimating the burden of foodborne disease, South Korea, 2008–2012. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015;12(3):207–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mangen MJ, Bouwknegt M, Friesema IH, Haagsma JA, Kortbeek LM, Tariq L, et al. Cost-of-illness and disease burden of food-related pathogens in the Netherlands, 2011. Int J Food Microbiol. 2015;196:84–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Cauteren D, Le Strat Y, Sommen C, Bruyand M, Tourdjman M, Da Silva NJ, et al. Estimated Annual Numbers of Foodborne Pathogen-Associated Illnesses, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, France, 2008–2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(9):1486–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu S, Duan N, Gu H, Hao L, Ye H, Gong W, et al. A Review of the Methods for Detection of Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxins. Toxins (Basel). 2016;8(7):176.

  13. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States–major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(1):7–15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu D, Liu J, Liu H, Guo Y, Dai Y, Liang J, et al. Epidemiological Features of Foodborne Disease Outbreaks in Catering Service Facilities - China, 2010–2020. China CDC Wkly. 2023;5(22):479–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu S, Huang J, Wu Q, Zhang F, Zhang J, Lei T, et al. Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Retail Vegetables in China. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1263.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chao G, Bao G, Cao Y, Yan W, Wang Y, Zhang X, et al. Prevalence and diversity of enterotoxin genes with genetic background of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different origins in China. Int J Food Microbiol. 2015;211:142–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanlibaba P. Prevalence, antibiotic resistance, and enterotoxin production of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from retail raw beef, sheep, and lamb meat in Turkey. Int J Food Microbiol. 2022;361:109461.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fischer AJ, Kilgore SH, Singh SB, Allen PD, Hansen AR, Limoli DH, et al. High Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxin Gene Cluster Superantigens in Cystic Fibrosis Clinical Isolates. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(12):1036.

  19. Garbacz K, Piechowicz L, Podkowik M, Mroczkowska A, Empel J, Bania J. Emergence and spread of worldwide Staphylococcus aureus clones among cystic fibrosis patients. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:247–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan X, Wang B, Tao X, Hu Q, Cui Z, Zhang J, et al. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with food poisoning in Shenzhen, China. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(18):6637–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Song M, Shi C, Xu X, Shi X. Molecular Typing and Virulence Gene Profiles of Enterotoxin Gene Cluster (egc)-Positive Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Obtained from Various Food and Clinical Specimens. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2016;13(11):592–601.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johler S, Giannini P, Jermini M, Hummerjohann J, Baumgartner A, Stephan R. Further evidence for staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks caused by egc-encoded enterotoxins. Toxins (Basel). 2015;7(3):997–1004.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Umeda K, Nakamura H, Yamamoto K, Nishina N, Yasufuku K, Hirai Y, et al. Molecular and epidemiological characterization of staphylococcal foodborne outbreak of Staphylococcus aureus harboring seg, sei, sem, sen, seo, and selu genes without production of classical enterotoxins. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;256:30–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jarraud S, Peyrat MA, Lim A, Tristan A, Bes M, Mougel C, et al. egc, a highly prevalent operon of enterotoxin gene, forms a putative nursery of superantigens in Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol. 2001;166(1):669–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nowrouzian FL, Dauwalder O, Meugnier H, Bes M, Etienne J, Vandenesch F, et al. Adhesin and superantigen genes and the capacity of Staphylococcus aureus to colonize the infantile gut. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(5):714–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Monday SR, Bohach GA. Genes encoding staphylococcal enterotoxins G and I are linked and separated by DNA related to other staphylococcal enterotoxins. J Nat Toxins. 2001;10(1):1–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chieffi D, Fanelli F, Cho GS, Schubert J, Blaiotta G, Franz C, et al. Novel insights into the enterotoxigenic potential and genomic background of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw milk. Food Microbiol. 2020;90:103482.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou W, Jin Y, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Xiong L, Luo Q, et al. Comparative Genomic Analysis Provides Insights into the Evolution and Genetic Diversity of Community-Genotype Sequence Type 72 Staphylococcus aureus Isolates. mSystems. 2021;6(5):e0098621.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Qian C, Castaneda-Gulla K, Sattlegger E, Mutukumira AN. Enterotoxigenicity and genetic relatedness of Staphylococcus aureus in a commercial poultry plant and poultry farm. Int J Food Microbiol. 2022;363:109454.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schwendimann L, Merda D, Berger T, Denayer S, Feraudet-Tarisse C, Klaui AJ, et al. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Gene Cluster: Prediction of Enterotoxin (SEG and SEI) Production and of the Source of Food Poisoning on the Basis of vSabeta Typing. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87(5):e0266220.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Novick RP, Ram G. Staphylococcal pathogenicity islands-movers and shakers in the genomic firmament. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;38:197–204.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Viana D, Blanco J, Tormo-Mas MA, Selva L, Guinane CM, Baselga R, et al. Adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus to ruminant and equine hosts involves SaPI-carried variants of von Willebrand factor-binding protein. Mol Microbiol. 2010;77(6):1583–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Novick RP, Christie GE, Penades JR. The phage-related chromosomal islands of Gram-positive bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(8):541–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Alibayov B, Zdenkova K, Sykorova H, Demnerova K. Molecular analysis of Staphylococcus aureus pathogenicity islands (SaPI) and their superantigens combination of food samples. J Microbiol Methods. 2014;107:197–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sato'o Y, Omoe K, Ono HK, Nakane A, Hu DL. A novel comprehensive analysis method for Staphylococcus aureus pathogenicity islands. Microbiol Immunol. 2013;57(2):91–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Novick RP. Mobile genetic elements and bacterial toxinoses: the superantigen-encoding pathogenicity islands of Staphylococcus aureus. Plasmid. 2003;49(2):93–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Alibayov B, Baba-Moussa L, Sina H, Zdenkova K, Demnerova K. Staphylococcus aureus mobile genetic elements. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(8):5005–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Baba T, Bae T, Schneewind O, Takeuchi F, Hiramatsu K. Genome sequence of Staphylococcus aureus strain Newman and comparative analysis of staphylococcal genomes: polymorphism and evolution of two major pathogenicity islands. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(1):300–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, et al. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2006;367(9512):731–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Baba T, Takeuchi F, Kuroda M, Yuzawa H, Aoki K, Oguchi A, et al. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet. 2002;359(9320):1819–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Noto MJ, Archer GL. A subset of Staphylococcus aureus strains harboring staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IV is deficient in CcrAB-mediated SCCmec excision. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(8):2782–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang P, Miao X, Zhou L, Cui B, Zhang J, Xu X, et al. Characterization of Oxacillin-Susceptible mecA-Positive Staphylococcus aureus from Food Poisoning Outbreaks and Retail Foods in China. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2020;17(11):728–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ruzickova V, Karpiskova R, Pantucek R, Pospisilova M, Cernikova P, Doskar J. Genotype analysis of enterotoxin H-positive Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from food samples in the Czech Republic. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;121(1):60–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu S, Zhang F, Huang J, Wu Q, Zhang J, Dai J, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of PVL-positive Staphylococcus aureus isolated from retail foods in China. Int J Food Microbiol. 2019;304:119–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Alba P, Feltrin F, Cordaro G, Porrero MC, Kraushaar B, Argudin MA, et al. Livestock-Associated Methicillin Resistant and Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Sequence Type (CC)1 in European Farmed Animals: High Genetic Relatedness of Isolates from Italian Cattle Herds and Humans. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0137143.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Monecke S, Coombs G, Shore AC, Coleman DC, Akpaka P, Borg M, et al. A field guide to pandemic, epidemic and sporadic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(4):e17936.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Mekhloufi OA, Chieffi D, Hammoudi A, Bensefia SA, Fanelli F, Fusco V. Prevalence, Enterotoxigenic Potential and Antimicrobial Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolated from Algerian Ready to Eat Foods. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(12):835.

  48. Ge B, Mukherjee S, Hsu CH, Davis JA, Tran TTT, Yang Q, et al. MRSA and multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in U.S. retail meats, 2010–2011. Food Microbiol. 2017;62:289–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Narvaez-Bravo C, Toufeer M, Weese SJ, Diarra MS, Deckert AE, Reid-Smith R, et al. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian commercial pork processing plants. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;120(3):770–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tang Y, Larsen J, Kjeldgaard J, Andersen PS, Skov R, Ingmer H. Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from retail meat in Denmark. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;249:72–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu S, Huang J, Wu Q, Zhang J, Zhang F, Yang X, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Retail Meat and Meat Products in China: Incidence, Antibiotic Resistance and Genetic Diversity. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2767.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhao H, Hu F, Jin S, Xu X, Zou Y, Ding B, et al. Typing of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Encoding Phages and lukSF-PV Gene Sequence Variation in Staphylococcus aureus from China. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1200.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Hu Q, Cheng H, Yuan W, Zeng F, Shang W, Tang D, et al. Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-positive health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates are associated with skin and soft tissue infections and colonized mainly by infective PVL-encoding bacteriophages. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(1):67–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chuang YY, Huang YC. Molecular epidemiology of community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Asia. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(8):698–708.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen Q, Xie S. Genotypes, Enterotoxin Gene Profiles, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus Associated with Foodborne Outbreaks in Hangzhou, China. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(6):307.

  56. Chen Q, Xie S, Lou X, Cheng S, Liu X, Zheng W, et al. Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources. Microbiologyopen. 2020;9(1):e00946.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Feil EJ, Li BC, Aanensen DM, Hanage WP, Spratt BG. eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(5):1518–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 81700768), the Special Supporting Program of Agriculture and Social Development from Hangzhou Municipal Science & Technology Bureau (grant number: 202203B34), the Health and Technology Program of Hangzhou (grant number: 2017A66).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Qi Chen and Zhengqing Lou contributed equally to this study.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 310000, Hangzhou, China

    Qi Chen, Wei Yang, Fuhong Chen, Yan Qi & Zhengqing Lou

  2. Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 310021, Hangzhou, China

    Gang Zhao

Authors
  1. Qi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fuhong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yan Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhengqing Lou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QC designed and performed all the molecular experiments described above and wrote the paper. WY, FC, YQ participated in the identification of the strains. ZL and GZ helped with the conceiving of the study and the manuscript draft.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qi Chen or Zhengqing Lou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table 1.

Primers used for detection of Staphylococcal enterotoxin genes

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Q., Zhao, G., Yang, W. et al. Investigation into the prevalence of enterotoxin genes and genetic background of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from retain foods in Hangzhou, China. BMC Microbiol 23, 294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-03027-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-03027-0

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us