Skip to main content
Download PDF

Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae with high-level resistance to cefuroxime, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

BMC Microbiology volume 23, Article number: 178 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) has become the major cause of invasive H. influenzae diseases in the post-H. influenzae type b vaccine era. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) NTHi is a growing public health problem. Herein, we investigated the molecular basis of MDR in NTHi. The isolated NTHi were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing for 12 agents. Whole genome and plasmid sequencing were conducted and analyzed to identify significant genetic variations and plasmid-encoded genes conferred antibiotic resistance.

Results

Thirteen (50%) MDR NTHi isolates were obtained; of these, 92.3% were non-susceptible to ampicillin, 30.8% to amoxicillin-clavulanate, 61.5% to cefuroxime, 61.5% to ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin, 92.3% to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 30.8% to tetracycline, and 7.7% to azithromycin. Eight ampicillin-resistant isolates were β-lactamase positive; of these, 6 carried blaTEM-1 and 2 carried blaROB-1, whereas 4 were β-lactamase negative. Genetic variations in mrdA, mepA, and pbpG were correlated with amoxicillin-clavulanate non-susceptibility, whereas variations in ftsI and lpoA conferred cefuroxime resistance. Five variations in gyrA, 2 in gyrB, 3 in parC, 1 in parE, and 1 in the parC-parE intergenic region were associated with levofloxacin/ciprofloxacin non-susceptibility. Among these genes, 8 variations were linked to high-level levofloxacin resistance. Six variations in folA were associated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance. Plasmid-bearing tet(B) and mef(A) genes were responsible for tetracycline and azithromycin resistance in 4 and 1 MDR isolates, respectively.

Conclusions

This study clarified the molecular epidemiology of MDR in NTHi. This can benefit the monitoring of drug resistance trends in NTHi and the adequate medical management of patients with NTHi infection.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The global vaccination programme against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) has substantially affected the epidemiology of Hib infections in most countries. Compelling observations provide concrete evidence for the thriving of non-typeable H. influenzae (NTHi) in the post-Hib vaccination era. NTHi is a major cause of otitis media, bacterial sinusitis, and bacterial conjunctivitis in children; moreover, it exacerbates chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and causes up to 5% of neonatal invasive bacterial infections [1]. National surveillance data from 14 European and other countries indicate that NTHi causes 97% of non-Hib infections in invasive H. influenzae disease [2]. The highest incidence of invasive NTHi diseases occurs in premature infants, elderly adults, the immunosuppressed, individuals with malignant disease, and those with chronic cardiovascular or respiratory conditions. The fatality rate is higher than 10% among such individuals [3, 4].

Empirical treatment for NTHi infection is akin to that for typeable H. influenzae infection. Ampicillin is the standard recipe for β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-susceptible NTHi infections, with chloramphenicol or broad-spectrum cephalosporins used as alternate regimens. In both typeable H. influenzae and NTHi, β-lactamase production, particularly by blaTEM-1, is the predominant resistance mechanism against penicillins and some cephalosporins. Studies have reported rates of β-lactamase-positive ampicillin-resistant (BLPAR) NTHi between 10 and 25% in South Africa, Europe, and the Americas [5,6,7,8]. In Taiwan, Vietnam, Japan, and South Korea, BLPAR may constitute up to 55% of NTHi [9,10,11,12]. The prevalence of β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) NTHi is also high in Taiwan, Vietnam, and South Korea [9, 11, 12]. Macrolides, quinolones, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and third-generation cephalosporins may provide coverage for ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae infection.

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) NTHi was infrequent in Western countries but has been sporadically reported in Asian areas [13,14,15]. Reported MDR NTHi strains were resistant to β-lactams, macrolides, quinolones, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, suggesting that NTHi is acquiring drug resistance through different ploys. Because the molecular epidemiology of MDR in NTHi remains unclear, we conducted whole genome and plasmid analyses to delineate the genes and genetic variations relevant to MDR NTHi and high-level drug resistance.

Results

Antibiogram of NTHi

Twenty-six NTHi isolates were included in this study. An analysis of β-lactam resistance revealed that 12 (46.2%) isolates were non-susceptible to ampicillin, 4 (15.4%) to amoxicillin-clavulanate, and 8 (30.8%) to cefuroxime (Fig. 1). For non-β-lactam resistance, 20 (76.9%) isolates were non-susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 1 (3.8%) to azithromycin, 15 (57.7%) to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, and 5 (19.2%) to tetracycline. All isolates were susceptible to cefotaxime, ertapenem, meropenem, and tigecycline. Regarding the antibiogram, 5 isolates (No. 01, 11, 12, 14, and 20) were susceptible to all drugs, whereas 8 were non-susceptible to 2 categories of agents (Table 1). Among 13 MDR isolates, 4 (No. 05, 08, 13, and 18) were non-susceptible to 3 categories of agents, 8 (No. 04, 06, 07, 09, 10, 15, 19, and 23) to 4 categories, and 1 (No. 22) to 5 categories.

Fig. 1
figure 1

MIC and susceptibility profile of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi). Percentage of MICs of different antimicrobial agents in 26 NTHi isolates are shown in a circle plot. Bold arc represents the drug-susceptible range according to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute M100 31st edition. MICs of ertapenem, meropenem, and tigecycline in all isolates were ≤ 0.25 Î¼g/mL. AM, ampicillin; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanate; AZM, azithromycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CTX, cefotaxime; CXM, cefuroxime; ETP, ertapenem; LVX, levofloxacin; MEM, meropenem; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; TE, tetracycline; TGC, tigecycline

Full size image
Table 1 Antibiogram of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae isolates
Full size table

Plasmid-mediated drug resistance

Plasmid-encoded antibiotic resistance genes were assessed in each isolate. An intact blaTEM-1 was detected in 6 isolates (Table 2). Partial sequences of blaTEM-1 were detected in isolate No. 23. Moreover, genes with high sequence identity to blaROB-1 were discovered in isolates No. 22 and 23; blaROB-11 in isolate No. 22. Two of these BLPAR isolates (No. 06 and 22) were β-lactamase-positive amoxicillin-clavulanate resistant. Among 5 tetracycline-resistant isolates, tetR/acrR family transcriptional regulator gene was detected in isolate No. 02 and tet(B) in the other 4 isolates. Moreover, mef(A) was discovered in the azithromycin-non-susceptible isolate (No. 04). No plasmid-mediated quinolone-resistance genes or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistance genes were characterized.

Table 2 Identification of plasmid-encoded drug-resistant gene in non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae isolates
Full size table

Genomic variations associated with drug resistance

In the analysis of β-lactam resistance, we focused on penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) and penicillin-insensitive-related proteins. In ampicillin-resistant isolates, the group I ftsI mutation was detected in 2 BLPAR isolates, and both group II and III ftsI mutations were detected in 3 BLPAR isolates (Table 3). In BLNAR isolates, group II ftsI mutation was detected in isolate No. 05, and group III-like ftsI mutation was observed in isolates No. 09 and 13. A novel ftsI mutation type was found in isolate No. 19. Furthermore, genetic variations, namely 1070G > A (Ser357Asn), 1594A > T (Thr532Ser), and 1669T > C (Tyr557His) in ftsI, and 453G > C (Met151Ile) in lpoA (PBP1a), were associated with cefuroxime-resistance (Table 4). The area under the ROCs (AUROCs) for Ser357Asn, Thr532Ser, and Tyr557His substitutions in PBP3 and Met151Ile in PBP1a to discriminate the MIC of cefuroxime were 0.805, 0.910, 0.946, and 0.891, respectively. Other than ftsI, 3 genetic variations, namely 1552G > A in HI_0032 (mrdA) for Ala518Thr substitution in PBP2, 82C > A in HI_0197 (mepA) for Gln28Lys in penicillin-insensitive murein endopeptidase, and 674G > T in HI_0364 (pbpG) for Arg225Leu in PBP7, were correlated with amoxicillin-clavulanate non-susceptibility in NTHi (Table 4). The AUROCs for Ala518Thr substitution in PBP2, Gln28Lys in penicillin-insensitive murein endopeptidase, and Arg225Leu in PBP7 to discriminate the MIC of amoxicillin-clavulanate were 0.750, 0.767, and 0.859, respectively.

Table 3 Amino acid substitutions in FtsI in ampicillin-resistant non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae isolates
Full size table
Table 4 Genetic variations associated with cefuroxime, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole non-susceptibility in non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae isolates
Full size table

In isolates non-susceptible to fluoroquinolones and folate pathway antagonists, 12 genetic variations in gyrA, gyrB, parC, parE, and the parA-parC intergenic region and 6 variations in folA were associated with ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole non-susceptibility, respectively (Table 4). The AUROCs for Ser84Phe, Asp88Gly, Glu433Asp, and Ile472Val substitutions in GyrA, Ala725Val in GyrB, and Ser145Asn in ParE to discriminate the MIC of levofloxacin were all higher than 0.73. Corresponding AUROCs for Lys20Arg and Ser84Ile substitutions in ParC and n.1600250A > C in the parC-parE intergenic region were higher than 0.82. Furthermore, AUROCs for Asn13Ser, Ile95Leu, and Lys107Gln substitutions in FolA to discriminate the MIC of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were 0.954, 0.795, and 0.775, respectively.

We analyzed the sequence of related transporter and porin genes in the NTHi isolates (Table S1). No genetic variations in these genes were associated with the resistance to the agents we tested.

Protein substitutions associated with high-level drug resistance

Four NTHi isolates had a high-level cefuroxime resistance (MIC ≧64 μg/mL) (Fig. 2A). Moreover, 13 and 14 isolates had high-level resistance to levofloxacin (MICs ≧32 μg/mL) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (MICs ≧32 μg/mL), respectively. A logistic regression analysis revealed that Thr532Ser substitution in FtsI was an independent factor associated with high-level cefuroxime resistance (Table 5). Furthermore, Asp88Gly, Glu433Asp, and Asp740Glu substitutions in GyrA, Ala725Val in GyrB, Lys20Arg and Ser84Ile in ParC, Ser145Asn in ParE, and n.1600250A > C in the parC-parE intergenic region held up the relationship to high-level levofloxacin resistance. A network clustering showed the connection of these 8 variations (Fig. 2B). No single mutation was found to be associated with high-level trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Isolates with high-level resistance to cefuroxime, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. (A) A Venn diagram for NTHi isolates with cefuroxime MIC ≧64 μg/mL and both levofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole MICs ≧32 μg/mL is shown. (B) A network clustering of mutation for high-level levofloxacin resistance is shown. The size of the circles and width of the lines are proportional to the frequency of each mutation and the connection of two mutations, respectively

Full size image
Table 5 Logistic regression analyses of genetic variations associated with high-level resistance to cefuroxime, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in NTHi
Full size table

Molecular epidemiology of MDR NTHi

The molecular epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in 13 MDR NTHi isolates is displayed in Fig. 3. Ampicillin resistance was detected in 12 isolates; of these 8 were BLPAR (blaTEM-1 in 6 and blaROB-1 in 2), and 4 were BLNAR. Amino acid substitutions in FtsI in ampicillin-resistant isolates are listed in Table 3. Thr532Ser, Ser357Asn, and Tyr557His substitutions in FtsI were detected in 7, 4, and 5 cefuroxime-resistant MDR isolates, respectively. Furthermore, Ala518Thr substitution in MrdA and Arg225Leu in PbpG were detected in all amoxicillin-clavulanate-non-susceptible MDR isolates, whereas Gln28Lys in MepA was absent in isolate No. 22. Regarding levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin non-susceptibility, Ser84Phe, Asp88Gly, Glu433Asp, Ile472Val, and Asp740Glu substitutions in GyrA were observed in 8, 4, 6, 7, and 3 isolates, respectively. Moreover, Ala606Val substitution in GyrB, Ser84Ile on ParC, and n.1600250A > C in the parC-parE intergenic region were discovered in more than 75% of MDR isolates. Asn13Ser substitution in FolA was found in all 12 trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant MDR isolates, and Leu67Pro, Ile95Leu, and Lys107Gln in more than 9 MDR isolates. Finally, Tet(B), which confers tetracycline resistance was detected in 4 MDR isolates and Mef(A), which confers azithromycin resistance, in one isolate.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic diagram of amino acid substitution panels in multidrug-resistant non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae isolates. Blue box, ampicillin-resistance; green box, amoxicillin-clavulanate resistance; beige box, cefuroxime resistance; red box, levofloxacin resistance; gray box, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance; purple box, azithromycin resistance; orange box, tetracycline resistance. Substitutions associated with high-level drug resistance were marked with an asterisk

Full size image

Discussion

With a similar clinical spectrum to Hib, NTHi has become the most common cause of invasive H. influenzae diseases in all age groups since the global implementation of Hib-conjugate vaccination [2]. After the isolation of the first MDR H. influenzae strain in 1980 [16], infections caused by these bacteria have increased rapidly, thereby triggering enhanced vigilance worldwide. Yang et al. noted a nosocomial outbreak of MDR NTHi in the respiratory care ward of a community hospital in Taiwan [13]. Yamada et al. identified an NTHi strain resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, levofloxacin, clarithromycin, and tetracycline [14]. Li et al. also identified MDR NTHi strains with β-lactam/azithromycin/trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as the most frequent pattern of resistance [15]. The rising incidence of NTHi in difficult-to-treat respiratory infections and the drug-resistant evolution in this microbe warrant its surveillance. The World Health Organization included H. influenzae on the priority pathogen list for which new antibiotics are urgently required [17]. Our study is crucial for not only yielding a better understanding of the molecular epidemiology of antibiotic resistance in NTHi but also for providing critical information on therapeutic options to confront this emerging threat.

Ampicillin remains the first-line antibiotic in the treatment of H. influenzae infections. However, the widespread plasmid-mediated class A serine β-lactamases, most often TEM-1 and rarely ROB-1 [18, 19], drastically reduce the efficacy of ampicillin and other β-lactam agents against H. influenzae. Our previous 12-year survey demonstrated that the prevalence of BLPAR and BLNAR H. influenzae was 30.5% and 25.5%, respectively, in Taiwan [20]. Jean et al. reported the rate of BLPAR H. influenzae infection was 55% in patients treated at the intensive care units of 10 major teaching hospitals in Taiwan [11]. In this study, 30.8% of the NTHi isolates were BLPAR and 15.4% were BLNAR. TEM-1 β-lactamase was detected in 75% of the BLPAR isolates. Mutations in ftsI may increase ampicillin resistance in BLPAR strains. Two BLPAR isolates had type I FtsI mutations (Arg517His), 3 had type II (Asn526Lys), and 3 had type III (Ser385Thr with Asn526Lys) [21,22,23]. This may be the reason for the higher mean MIC of ampicillin in the BLPAR isolates (58.4 Î¼g/mL) than in the BLNAR isolates (2.3 Î¼g/mL). BLNAR H. influenzae strains are also less susceptible to other β-lactam agents, particularly cephalosporins. Cefaclor or cefuroxime might be better indicators than ampicillin for BLNAR strains [24, 25]. Straker et al. identified that Ser357Asn substitution in FtsI has a profound effect on cefuroxime resistance in H. influenzae, while D350N, A502T, and N526K do not directly attribute to cefuroxime resistance but may play an additive role in reduced cefuroxime susceptibility when present with other substitutions [26]. No mutations in dacA and dacB, encoding PBP5 and PBP4, respectively, were associated with cefuroxime resistance [26]. All 8 cefuroxime-resistant isolates had Ser357Asn substitution in FtsI except isolate No. 23, in which Arg517His, Thr532Ala, and Tyr557His substitutions in FtsI and Met151Ile in LpoA, a PBP activator, were found. Met151Ile substitution in LpoA was also detected in 2 cefuroxime-resistant isolates. The result from logistic regression showed that Thr532Ser substitution in FtsI but not Arg517His and Ser385Thr was correlated with high-level cefuroxime resistance. However, 5 NTHi isolates harbored this mutation and type III-like mutation in FtsI simultaneously. Accordingly, Thr532Ser substitution in FtsI may greatly augment cefuroxime resistance. Three genetic variations, causing missense mutations in MrdA, MepA, and PbpG, respectively, were linked to amoxicillin-clavulanate non-susceptibility in NTHi. MrdA (PBP2) is a D,D-transpeptidase. PbpG (PBP7) is a D,D-endopeptidase that hydrolyzes diaminopimelate-alanine bonds. MepA is a penicillin-insensitive murein endopeptidase that cleaves the D-alanyl-meso-2,6- diamino-pimelyl amide bond. These proteins are essential for peptidoglycan synthesis during cell wall elongation. Further investigations are needed to understand how mutations in these proteins contribute to amoxicillin-clavulanate non-susceptibility.

Regarding macrolide resistance, H. influenzae may acquire efflux pumps homologous to the AcrAB efflux machinery or to major facilitator superfamily transporters in Escherichia coli, thereby leading to the extrusion of macrolides from cells. Although the existence of macrolide efflux genes in H. influenzae has been a subject of debate, several studies have confirmed their presence. Roberts et al. identified azithromycin-resistant NTHi in children with cystic fibrosis, and mef(A), erm(B), and erm(F) were detected in 74%, 31%, and 29% of isolates, respectively [27]. Moreover, mef(A)-bearing NTHi was reported in Japan [28]. We identified one azithromycin-resistant isolate (MIC = 8 Î¼g/mL) with mef(A). No genetic variations in the efflux pump genes were associated with azithromycin resistance in this isolate. We should be cautious regarding the expansion of macrolide-resistant NTHi because of a horizontal transfer of macrolide-resistance genes from other microbes over time. Four MDR NTHi isolates obtained conjugative plasmids with tet(B), which encodes an efflux protein leading to tetracycline resistance. Tet(B) can confer resistance to both tetracycline and minocycline, but not to the new glycylcyclines [29]. Therefore, 4 tet(B)-positive isolates exhibited MICs of tetracycline higher than 4 Î¼g/mL but were all susceptible to tigecycline.

Because of toxicity, quinolones are not favored as therapeutic options in the treatment of H. influenzae diseases, particularly in children. Resistance to quinolones in H. influenzae is rare in the West but severe in East Asia. In Taiwan, as indicated by earlier surveys, the levofloxacin non-susceptibility rate in H. influenzae is 12.5% to 14.1% [20, 30]. Herein, 57.7% of the NTHi isolates and 61.5% of MDR strains were non-susceptible to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Similar to the cause of quinolone resistance in other bacterial species, resistance in NTHi mainly results from mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region of the genes encoding DNA gyrase or topoisomerase IV [31, 32]. Studies have demonstrated that in H. influenzae, Ser84 and Asp88 substitutions in GyrA, and Gly82, Ser84, and Glu88 in ParC were closely related to low quinolone susceptibility [33,34,35]. In addition to these mutations, we identified novel significant mutations that rendered high-level levofloxacin resistance. One point mutation in the parC-parE intergenic region was detected in 73% of levofloxacin/ciprofloxacin-non-susceptible isolates but was absent in all susceptible isolates. This mutation locates in the promoter region of parC and how it affects gene expression is unclear. These mutations were shown to be related to high-level levofloxacin resistance in a univariate but not a multivariate regression model (data not shown), indicating that these factors were tightly correlated, which can be evidenced by the network clustering model.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, by blocking tetrahydrofolate synthesis in bacterial cells, is a relatively inexpensive drug, with wide use worldwide. Trimethoprim resistance is caused primarily by the low affinity of mutant dihydrofolate reductase to the drug but not to natural substrates, whereas sulfamethoxazole resistance generally arises from the acquisition of either sul1 or sul2, encoding different forms of dihydropteroate synthase that are not inhibited by the drug. In this study, neither sul1/sul2 nor genetic variations in folP and thyA were linked to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in the NTHi isolates. Six substitutions in FolA identified in this study have been characterized to be associated with low-level trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance [36, 37]. These 6 substitutions individually had no relevance in high-level resistance and seemed to act in an interconnected manner to cause the higher MIC values. Our earlier report demonstrated that more than half of H. influenzae strains in Taiwan were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, making this drug no longer efficacious in the treatment of H. influenzae infections [20]. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the local trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance situation and use this drug carefully with consideration of qualified susceptibility reports.

Conclusion

In closing, no extended-spectrum β-lactamases were detected in our NTHi isolates. Carbapenems and tigecycline are currently active against MDR NTHi strains. Studies monitoring trends in the antimicrobial resistance of H. influenzae should be standardized and continued. Furthermore, antibiotic stewardship at healthcare facilities should exercise standard operating procedures to manage H. influenzae infections, particularly those caused by MDR strains, and to avoid the acquisition of broad spectrum β-lactamases or other resistant mechanisms to last-line drugs.

Materials and methods

Isolation and serotyping of H. influenzae

The Institutional Review Board of E-Da Hospital approved this study (No. 2021009) and waived the informed consent requirement because this study used only bacterial isolates and did not have any negative impact on patients. No patients were under the age of 18 years. After the exclusion of H. influenzae isolates from unqualified sputum specimens, 26 NTHi isolates were collected from September 2017 to December 2019, as previously reported [38]. Eight isolates were obtained from blood cultures and 18 from sputum specimens. Suspected bacteria were re-isolated on chocolate agar (Creative Life Sciences, New Taipei city, Taiwan) and identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (VITEK MS, BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). Slide agglutination tests were conducted using Difco Haemophilus Influenzae Antisera (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) to determine the serotype of H. influenzae. Isolates were stored in skim milk containing glycerol at − 80 ℃ until use.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 12 antimicrobial agents, namely ampicillin (penicillins), amoxicillin-clavulanate (β-lactam combination agents), cefuroxime (cephems), cefotaxime (cephems), ertapenem (carbapenems), meropenem (carbapenems), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (folate pathway antagonists), azithromycin (macrolides), levofloxacin (fluoroquinolones), ciprofloxacin (fluoroquinolones), tetracycline (tetracyclines), and tigecycline (glycylcycline), were examined using ETEST strips (BioMérieux). Disk diffusion tests using a BBL Sensi-Disc (Becton, Dickinson and Company) were also performed to confirm the drug susceptibility patterns. The ATCC 49247 NTHi strain was used as the control in antimicrobial susceptibility tests. The antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints were interpreted in accordance with the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute, M100, 31st Edition guidelines. However, for tigecycline, the US Food and Drug Administration breakpoints were used. MDR is defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories [39]. High-level resistance to cefuroxime, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in NTHi were defined as MIC of ≧64 μg/mL, ≧32 μg/mL, and ≧32 μg/mL, respectively.

Genomic and plasmid DNA purification and sequencing

Each NTHi isolate was cultured on chocolate agar at 37 ℃ with 5% CO2 for 20 h, which was followed by harvesting. Bacterial genomic DNA and plasmid DNA were extracted using a Presto Mini gDNA Bacteria Kit (Geneaid, New Taipei City, Taiwan) and a QIAGEN Plasmid Midi Kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD, USA), respectively. DNA samples were concentrated using a Qubit dsDNA HS assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The DNA library was prepared using a Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced with the MiSeq system (Illumina) using the 250-bp paired-end read protocol.

Bioinformatic analyses

The quality of raw read data was analyzed using FastQC [40]. High-quality reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic [41] and assembled into genomes using BWA software with H. influenzae strain Rd KW20 as the reference (NC_000907.1). A genome subset was generated using PacBio, and Samtools was used to assess plot coverage. Variant calling and annotation were conducted using Bcftools and SnpEff, respectively. Drug-resistant genes on plasmids were assessed using BLASTx and compared with sequences available in the RefSeq database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Alignment of reads to plasmids was accomplished using the QIAGEN CLC Workbench software (CLC bio).

Statistical analysis

SPSS 18.0 for Windows was used for statistical analyses. Fisher's exact tests were used to search amino acid substitutions that were associated with drug non-susceptibility. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used for different amino acid substitutions to differentiate the MIC of antimicrobial agents. Logistic regression assays were used to identify amino acid substitutions that were associated with high-level resistance to cefuroxime and levofloxacin. Significance is set at P < 0.05 (2-tailed).

Availability of data and materials

Raw DNA-Seq reads of each NTHi isolate are available from the NCBI (PRJNA918521).

Abbreviations

AUROC:

The area under receiver operating characteristic curve

BLNAR:

β-Lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant

BLPAR:

β-Lactamase-positive ampicillin-resistant

Hib:

Haemophilus influenzae Serotype b

MDR:

Multidrug-resistant

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

NTHi:

Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae

PBP:

Penicillin-binding protein

References

  1. Heath PT, Booy R, Azzopardi HJ, Slack MP, Fogarty J, Moloney AC, et al. Non-type b Haemophilus influenzae disease: clinical and epidemiologic characteristics in the Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine era. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20:300–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ladhani S, Slack MP, Heath PT, von Gottberg A, Chandra M, Ramsay ME, et al. Invasive Haemophilus influenzae Disease, Europe, 1996–2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:455–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Soeters HM, Blain A, Pondo T, Doman B, Farley MM, Harrison LH, et al. Current Epidemiology and Trends in Invasive Haemophilus influenzae Disease-United States, 2009–2015. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:881–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Wessel K, Rodenburg GD, Veenhoven RH, Spanjaard L, van der Ende A, Sanders EA. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae invasive disease in The Netherlands: a retrospective surveillance study 2001–2008. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:e1-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liebowitz LD, Slabbert M, Huisamen A. National surveillance programme on susceptibility patterns of respiratory pathogens in South Africa: moxifloxacin compared with eight other antimicrobial agents. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:344–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Beekmann SE, Heilmann KP, Richter SS, Garcia-de-Lomas J, Doern GV, Group GS. Antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and group A beta-haemolytic streptococci in 2002-2003. Results of the multinational GRASP Surveillance Program. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005;25:148–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alpuche C, Garau J, Lim V. Global and local variations in antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistance development in the major respiratory pathogens. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30(Suppl 2):S135–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jansen WT, Verel A, Beitsma M, Verhoef J, Milatovic D. Surveillance study of the susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to various antibacterial agents in Europe and Canada. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:2853–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gotoh K, Qin L, Watanabe K, Anh DD, Huong Ple T, Anh NT, et al. Prevalence of Haemophilus influenzae with resistant genes isolated from young children with acute lower respiratory tract infections in Nha Trang Vietnam. J Infect Chemother. 2008;14:349–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Niki Y, Hanaki H, Yagisawa M, Kohno S, Aoki N, Watanabe A, et al. The first nationwide surveillance of bacterial respiratory pathogens conducted by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy. Part 1: a general view of antibacterial susceptibility. J Infect Chemother. 2008;14:279–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jean SS, Hsueh PR, Lee WS, Chang HT, Chou MY, Chen IS, et al. Nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae in intensive care units in Taiwan. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:1013–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bae SM, Lee JH, Lee SK, Yu JY, Lee SH, Kang YH. High prevalence of nasal carriage of beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae in healthy children in Korea. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141:481–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang CJ, Chen TC, Wang CS, Wang CY, Liao LF, Chen YH, et al. Nosocomial outbreak of biotype I, multidrug-resistant, serologically non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae in a respiratory care ward in Taiwan. J Hosp Infect. 2010;74:406–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamada S, Seyama S, Wajima T, Yuzawa Y, Saito M, Tanaka E, et al. beta-Lactamase-non-producing ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae is acquiring multidrug resistance. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13:497–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li XX, Xiao SZ, Gu FF, He WP, Ni YX, Han LZ. Molecular Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance of Haemophilus influenzae in Adult Patients in Shanghai China. Front Public Health. 2020;8:95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Braveny I, Machka K. Multiple resistant Haemophilus influenzae and parainfluenzae in West Germany. Lancet. 1980;2:752–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. WHO: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed. 2017.

  18. Medeiros AA, O’Brien TF. Ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae type B possessing a TEM-type beta-lactamase but little permeability barrier to ampicillin. Lancet. 1975;1:716–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin LG, Medeiros AA, Yolken RH, Moxon ER. Ampicillin treatment failure of apparently beta-lactamase-negative Haemophilus influenzae type b meningitis due to novel beta-lactamase. Lancet. 1981;2:1008–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Su PY, Huang AH, Lai CH, Lin HF, Lin TM, Ho CH. Extensively drug-resistant Haemophilus influenzae - emergence, epidemiology, risk factors, and regimen. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ubukata K, Shibasaki Y, Yamamoto K, Chiba N, Hasegawa K, Takeuchi Y, et al. Association of amino acid substitutions in penicillin-binding protein 3 with beta-lactam resistance in beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:1693–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Dabernat H, Delmas C, Seguy M, Pelissier R, Faucon G, Bennamani S, et al. Diversity of beta-lactam resistance-conferring amino acid substitutions in penicillin-binding protein 3 of Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:2208–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Han MS, Jung HJ, Lee HJ, Choi EH. Increasing Prevalence of Group III Penicillin-Binding Protein 3 Mutations Conferring High-Level Resistance to Beta-Lactams Among Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae Isolates from Children in Korea. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25:567–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. James PA, Lewis DA, Jordens JZ, Cribb J, Dawson SJ, Murray SA. The incidence and epidemiology of beta-lactam resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;37:737–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Livermore DM, Winstanley TG, Shannon KP. Interpretative reading: recognizing the unusual and inferring resistance mechanisms from resistance phenotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;48(Suppl 1):87–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Straker K, Wootton M, Simm AM, Bennett PM, MacGowan AP, Walsh TR. Cefuroxime resistance in non-beta-lactamase Haemophilus influenzae is linked to mutations in ftsI. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:523–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Roberts MC, Soge OO, No DB. Characterization of macrolide resistance genes in Haemophilus influenzae isolated from children with cystic fibrosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:100–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seyama S, Wajima T, Suzuki M, Ushio M, Fujii T, Noguchi N. Emergence and molecular characterization of Haemophilus influenzae harbouring mef(A). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:948–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chopra I, Roberts M. Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001;65:232–60 (second page, table of contents).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuo SC, Chen PC, Shiau YR, Wang HY, Lai JFs, Huang W, et al. Levofloxacin-resistant haemophilus influenzae, Taiwan, 2004–2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1386–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Nazir J, Urban C, Mariano N, Burns J, Tommasulo B, Rosenberg C, et al. Quinolone-resistant Haemophilus influenzae in a long-term care facility: clinical and molecular epidemiology. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1564–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rodriguez-Martinez JM, Lopez L, Garcia I, Pascual A. Characterization of a clinical isolate of Haemophilus influenzae with a high level of fluoroquinolone resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57:577–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hirakata Y, Ohmori K, Mikuriya M, Saika T, Matsuzaki K, Hasegawa M, et al. Antimicrobial activities of piperacillin-tazobactam against Haemophilus influenzae isolates, including beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant and beta-lactamase-positive amoxicillin-clavulanate-resistant isolates, and mutations in their quinolone resistance-determining regions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:4225–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Yokota S, Ohkoshi Y, Sato K, Fujii N. Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Haemophilus influenzae strains among elderly patients but not among children. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:361–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shoji H, Shirakura T, Fukuchi K, Takuma T, Hanaki H, Tanaka K, et al. A molecular analysis of quinolone-resistant Haemophilus influenzae: validation of the mutations in Quinolone Resistance-Determining Regions. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20:250–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lindemann PC, Mylvaganam H, Oppegaard O, Anthonisen IL, Zecic N, Skaare D. Case Report: Whole-Genome Sequencing of Serially Collected Haemophilus influenzae From a Patient With Common Variable Immunodeficiency Reveals Within-Host Evolution of Resistance to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and Azithromycin After Prolonged Treatment With These Antibiotics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:896823.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sierra Y, Tubau F, Gonzalez-Diaz A, Carrera-Salinas A, Moleres J, Bajanca-Lavado P, et al. Assessment of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole susceptibility testing methods for fastidious Haemophilus spp. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26:944 e941-944 e947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheng WHSW, Wen MY, Su PY, Ho CH. Molecular characterization of cefepime and aztreonam nonsusceptibility in Haemophilus influenzae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:268–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.

  41. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Department of Information Technology of E-Da Hospital for providing demographic and clinical data of the patients. We also thank Focus Genomics Biotech Co. Ltd. for the whole-genome sequencing of the bacterial isolates. This manuscript was edited by Wallace Academic Editing by native speakers of English.

Funding

This work was supported by E-Da Hospital medical research project (grant EDAHT111005) and the Taiwan National Science and Technology Council (grant 111–2314-B-214–003-MY3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Pei-Yi Su

  2. Department of Parasitology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Wei-Hung Cheng

  3. Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Medical Science and Technology, I-Shou University, No.8, Yida Road, Jiaosu Village, Yanchao District, Kaohsiung City, 82445, Taiwan

    Cheng-Hsun Ho

Authors
  1. Pei-Yi Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei-Hung Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cheng-Hsun Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PYS was responsible for the interpretation of results of bacterial identification and collected the isolates; WHC analyzed sequence data; CHH was responsible for experimental design, experiment performance, data analysis, and manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Hsun Ho.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (No. 2021009) and performed at E-DA Hospital in accordance with the ethical standards noted in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Written informed consents were waived by the Institutional Review Board of E-DA Hospital because the study involved no more than minimal risk of harm to subjects.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Previous presentation or publication

The whole manuscript has not been submitted, presented in any meetings, or accepted for publication elsewhere. 

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary Table 1. Numbers of genetic variations detected in drug resistance-associated transporter and outer membrane protein genes in NTHi isolates.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, PY., Cheng, WH. & Ho, CH. Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae with high-level resistance to cefuroxime, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. BMC Microbiol 23, 178 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02926-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02926-6

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us