Skip to main content
Download PDF

Emergence of amoxicillin resistance and identification of novel mutations of the pbp1A gene in Helicobacter pylori in Vietnam

BMC Microbiology volume 22, Article number: 41 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Amoxicillin-resistant Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) strains seem to have increased over time in Vietnam. This threatens the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication therapies with this antibiotic. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of primary resistance of H. pylori to amoxicillin and to assess its association with pbp1A point mutations in Vietnamese patients.

Materials and methods

Naive patients who presented with dyspepsia undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were recruited. Rapid urease tests and PCR assays were used to diagnose H. pylori infection. Amoxicillin susceptibility was examined by E-tests. Molecular detection of the mutant pbp1A gene conferring amoxicillin resistance was carried out by real-time PCR followed by direct sequencing of the PCR products. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the Tamura-Nei genetic distance model and the neighbor-joining tree building method.

Results

There were 308 patients (46.1% men and 53.9% women, p = 0.190) with H. pylori infection. The mean age of the patients was 40.5 ± 11.4 years, ranging from 18 to 74 years old. The E-test was used to determine the susceptibility to amoxicillin (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 0.125 μg/ml) in 101 isolates, among which the rate of primarily resistant strains to amoxicillin was 25.7%. Then, 270 sequences of pbp1A gene fragments were analysed. There were 77 amino acid substitution positions investigated, spanning amino acids 310–596, with the proportion varying from 0.4 to 100%. Seven amino acid changes were significantly different between amoxicillin-sensitive (AmoxS) and amoxicillin-resistant (AmoxR) samples, including Phe366 to Leu (p <  0.001), Ser414 to Arg (p <  0.001), Glu/Asn464–465 (p = 0.009), Val469 to Met (p = 0.021), Phe473 to Val (p <  0.001), Asp479 to Glu (p = 0.044), and Ser/Ala/Gly595–596 (p = 0.001). Phylogenetic analyses suggested that other molecular mechanisms might contribute to amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori in addition to the alterations in PBP1A.

Conclusions

We reported the emergence of amoxicillin-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains in Vietnam and new mutations statistically associated with this antimicrobial resistance. Additional studies are necessary to identify the mechanisms contributing to this resistance in Vietnam.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a Gram-negative microaerophilic pathogenic bacterium that colonises the human gastric mucosa. It has been categorised as a Group I carcinogen for gastric cancer [1]. It infects approximately 50% of individuals worldwide. In Vietnam, the prevalence of H. pylori is very high (75%) [2]. The rates of H. pylori infection in Vietnamese patients with chronic gastritis, gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, and gastroduodenal ulcers range from 59.9–69.9, 77.8, 85–95%, and 85.3–93.6%, respectively [3]. The incidence of gastric cancer in Vietnam has been reported to be the highest compared to other southeast Asian countries [4]. Successful H. pylori eradication has been demonstrated to not only heal peptic ulcers but also prevent their recurrence and reduce the incidence of gastric cancer [3, 5].

Amoxicillin is one of the key antibiotics often used to eradicate H. pylori in standard triple therapy (amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and proton pump inhibitor) as the first-line treatment [6]. However, the spread of amoxicillin- and/or clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori has become an important cause of eradication failure. A high rate of clarithromycin resistance of H. pylori (72.6%) has been well documented in Vietnam [7]. Additionally, recent data in Vietnam have shown that the amoxicillin resistance rate of H. pylori differs across regions and it seems to have increased over time, from 1.1% in 2015 to 10.4% in 2016 and 15% in 2018 [3, 8, 9]. This threatens the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication therapies with these antibiotics.

Point mutations in the genes coding for penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) lead to a decreased affinity for the drug and result in amoxicillin resistance [10, 11]. Among these genes, the pbp1A gene seems to be one of the keys [12,13,14,15]. There have been several studies on the molecular antibiotic resistance of H. pylori in Vietnam, but most of them focused on clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance [7, 9, 16]. This is the first study conducted to investigate the molecular mechanism of amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori in Vietnam.

The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of amoxicillin-resistant H. pylori-positive gastric biopsy specimens and to investigate point mutations in the pbp1A gene in H. pylori-sensitive and primary-resistant samples. This study contributes to uncovering novel point mutations in the pbp1A gene underlying this resistance effect.

Materials and methods

Patient population and clinical specimens

This study was conducted between January 2019 and April 2021 at the University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. A total of 308 Vietnamese patients with positive H. pylori infection by rapid urease test, presenting with naive dyspepsia and aged ≥18 years were recruited. The exclusion criteria included patients with gastric cancer and/or those who took any antibiotics within the last 4 weeks.

The sample size was calculated by RaoSoft® software (http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html) at a 95% confidence level and alpha set at 0.05. Based on the primary amoxicillin resistance rate of 15% [3] in H. pylori in Vietnam, the sample size was estimated at 195 for amoxicillin resistance study. We also set up a larger sample size at the same time for studying other molecular antimicrobial resistance in H. pylori as well. Therefore, the sample size of 308 was finally used for the analysis of amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori as the result of the available data. During upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, four biopsies were obtained from each of the 308 patients recruited to the study to make sure the highest rate of H. pylori recovered from the sampling and to limit the influence of H. pylori distribution in the gastric mucosa. The first pair of specimens (one from the antrum and one from the corpus) was tested using both the rapid urease test (NK-Pylori test, Nam Khoa Biotek Co., Ltd.) and a polymerase chain reaction-based test (PCR) (AccuPid H. pylori Genotyping Kit, ref. No. Q01HPY03.1A, Khoa Thuong Biotech Co., Ltd.). The second pair was stored in transport medium [17] and kept at 2–8 °C until processed for culture within 3 h after sampling. Samples from a total of 101 patients were collected for culture. The samples can also be stored at − 80 °C in BHI (BD) supplemented with 25% glycerol until culture. The Pbp1A gene fragment from all samples was subjected to direct sequencing. The patient characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics and diagnosis of the recruited patients
Full size table

Culture conditions and bacteria identification

Gastric biopsy specimens with a positive rapid urease test were collected and maintained for a maximum of 3 h in transport medium [17] until further processing. The samples were then ground in 100 μL brain heart infusion (BHI, BD) broth supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma–Aldrich) and cultured on Columbia agar (BD) plates supplemented with 10% lysed sheep blood (Nam Khoa Biotek Co., Ltd.), 1% isoVitaleX (BD), a skin antibiotic mixture (Sigma–Aldrich), and 2.5 μg/mL amphotericin B (Sigma–Aldrich). Plates were incubated for 4–5 days at 37 °C in a microaerobic atmosphere. A single colony of a 4–5-day-old culture was identified through morphological observation, urease tests and PCR specific to the cagA and vacA genes. A colony with specific morphology, a positive urease test and identified cagA and vacA was subcultured on Columbia agar plates as described above for 4 days. Amplification and detection of the cagA and vacA genes was performed based on a previously published protocol [18].

Determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration

The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of amoxicillin was determined by the E-test method (BioMerieux, ref.# 412243). H. pylori strains stored at − 80 °C were thawed on Columbia agar plates supplemented with 10% lysed sheep blood and 1% isoVitaleX and incubated at 37 °C for 3–4 days in a microaerobic atmosphere. Colonies were subcultured on another plate for 3 more days. Each plate was swabbed with a sterile cotton-tipped applicator, and the cells were suspended in BHI to obtain a turbidity equivalent to a 3.0 McFarland standard. A 100 μl bacterial suspension was inoculated on a Columbia plate containing 10% lysed sheep blood and 1% isoVitaleX, and another sterile cotton-tipped swab was used to streak in three directions across the plate. The plates were left to dry for 2–3 min, and then the E-test strips containing a continuous exponential gradient of amoxicillin were placed on the agar surface. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 3–4 days in a microaerobic atmosphere. At the end of the incubation period, the MICs were determined by the intercept of the zones of growth inhibition with the graded E-test strip. The reference H. pylori strain ATCC® 43504™ susceptible to amoxicillin (AmxS) was always used as a quality control strain, and MIC determination was accepted only if the MIC of amoxicillin for this strain was less than or equal to 0.125 μg/ml. The susceptibility of the H. pylori isolates to amoxicillin was classified as resistant if the MIC was greater than 0.125 μg/ml, according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints (https://eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/).

Direct sequencing of the pbp1A gene fragment

Total genomic DNA was extracted from the gastric biopsy specimens using a Qiacube automated purification system and kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s standard instructions. Optimisation of the real-time PCR components and conditions was performed to determine the optimal conditions for the amplification of a specific fragment of the pbp1A gene of the bacteria in an automated thermal cycler (Roto-Gene Q, Qiagen). Sequences of the pbp1A primers were designed in this study as follows: pbp1A-F: 5′-CGATAGATTTGGATTACCAACGC-3′; pbp1A-R: 5′-ACGATTTCTTTACGCAAGCC-3′. The size of the expected amplicon was 1035 bp. The pbp1A-F/R primers (300 nM), MgCl2 (1 mM), h-Taq DNA polymerase (2 units), dNTP mix (0.2 mM), 1X PCR buffer, 1X EvaGreen and 5 μl of the extracted DNA were used in a total reaction volume of 25 μl. The optimal amplification of the target DNA was set at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min. After amplification, the samples were denatured at 95 °C for 30 s and cooled to 65 °C, where they were held at that temperature for 30 s. Then, the samples were slowly heated to 95 °C at a ramping rate of 0.5 °C/s with continuous acquisition of the decline in fluorescent value. Melting curves were plotted automatically and analysed with Roto-Gene Q software. The specific melting temperature (Tm) of the pbp1A PCR products was 87.2 ± 0.2 °C.

The PCR products were purified with ethanol. The purified products were sequenced using a BigDye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The sequencing PCR products were purified with the BigDye XTerminator™ and read in an ABI 3130 Genetic Analyser. Nucleotide sequences of both chains obtained were aligned and transformed into amino acid sequences using Geneious Prime software version 2021.1.1 (Auckland, New Zealand) and compared to the sequences of strains 26,695 (AE000511) and Hargenberg (AF479617) deposited in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/) for detection of mutations in the pbp1A gene.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to describe the characteristics of the patients’ gender, age, residency, gastric disease status and susceptibility to amoxicillin of the strains isolated from the clinical samples. A one-sample binomial test was used to determine whether the proportion of cases (sex, amoxicillin resistance, coinfection) was equal to the previously documented corresponding proportion. The chi-square test was used to correlate the presence of mutations in the pbp1A gene and the susceptibility to amoxicillin. Fisher’s exact test was used alternatively when more than 20% of the expected counts were less than 5. Monte Carlo estimates of the exact significance were used when the data did not meet the assumption of the asymptotic method. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics

There were 308 qualified patients recruited in this study. Details on the demographic characteristics of these patients are presented in Table 1.

There were 46.1% (142/308; 95% CI: 40.3–51.6) men and 53.9% (166/308; 95% CI: 48.4–59.7%) women. The gender ratio occurred with probabilities of 0.5 and 0.5 (p = 0.190; binomial test). The mean age of the patients was 40.5 ± 11.4 (95% CI: 39.2–41.8) years, ranging from 18 to 74. Age followed a normal distribution (p = 0.247; skewness test). The highest percentage of patients was from Ho Chi Minh City (31.5%). The proportions of patients from nearby regions, including the southeastern area, Mekong River Delta, and central region, were similar, with proportions of 19.5, 22.1 and 25.3%, respectively; a very small percentage of patients (1.6%) were from the Red River Delta. Most patients were diagnosed with gastritis (93.5%; 288/308), and only a small percentage of them were diagnosed with gastric ulcers (6.5%; 20/308).

Amoxicillin MIC was determined randomly in 101 samples (32.8% of the entire study group). Among these samples, 74.3% (75/101) of strains were sensitive, and 25.7% (26/101) of strains were primarily resistant to amoxicillin. The isolates with phenotypic resistance to amoxicillin exhibited a MIC range of 0.190–1.5 mg/l (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

MIC range of isolates sensitive (blue) and resistant (red) to amoxicillin

Full size image

Virulence factors of H. pylori

The presence of the cagA or vacA gene was investigated in all 308 clinical specimens positive for the rapid urease test. Based on the vacA genotypes, coinfection was discovered: 38 (12.3%) specimens were colonised by at least two H. pylori strains (vacA m1 and vacA m2). All of the coinfection specimens were excluded from the analysis to assess the association between bacterial genotypes and clinical outcome as well as antibiotic resistance.

The cagA gene was present in 225 (83.3%) of the 270 H. pylori specimens. There was no association between gastritis and peptic ulcers with the presence or absence of the cagA gene (p = 1.000).

Regarding the vacA genotypes, most of the specimens had the vacA s1 allele (98.4%). No association was detected between the vacA signal sequences and the clinical outcome (p = 0.265). However, there was a relationship between the vacA middle sequences and the clinical outcome (p = 0.021). The vacA m1 allele was found to be significantly higher in 12 (75.0%) specimens from gastric ulcer patients, and the vacA m2 allele was significantly higher in 141 (55.5%) of the specimens from gastritis patients. The combination of the vacA signal and middle sequences with the clinical outcome also presented a similar significant relationship (p = 0.008). VacA s1m1 was higher in the ulcer group (75.0%), while vacA s1m2 was higher in the gastritis group (53.9%). The combination of cagA status and vacA genotypes was also investigated. There was an association between the combined genotypes and the clinical outcome (p = 0.032). In particular, no association was observed between the genotypes and the resistance to amoxicillin (p > 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2 The genotypes of the H. pylori strains and the clinical outcome
Full size table

Mutational changes in or adjacent to the acyl transpeptidase conserved sequence of the pbp1A gene

Amoxicillin resistance in AmxR H. pylori isolates is mediated by mutations in the pbp1A gene [13]. To investigate the genetic diversity of pbp1A genes in this study by gene sequencing, the pbp1A gene sequences of the H. pylori reference strain 26,695 (O25319, AmxS) and Hargenberg (AF479617, AmxR) were used as controls to compare and number the isolates according to the corresponding deduced amino acid sequences. A total of 270 sequences of pbp1A gene fragments spanning amino acids 310–596 were analysed. The results showed that the proportion of amino acid substitutions varied from 0.4 to 100% depending on the amino acid position (Fig. 2). Several amino acid positions in the acyl transpeptidase domain of PBP1A had a high proportion of substitutions, such as Asp535 to Asn (100%), Ser589 to Gly (96.7%), Asp479 to Glu (86.6%), and Asn504 to Asp (74.1%). Amino acid positions with substitution proportions equal to or lower than 1% are not shown on the graph (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Amino acid substitution proportion of deduced PBP-1A discovered in the population compared to the AmxS H. pylori strain 26,695. Red represents amino acid substitution differences with statistical significance from AmxS and AmxR samples by the E-test. A proportion lower than 1% was not included in the picture

Full size image

Association between amino acid substitution and amoxicillin susceptibility

To investigate which pbp1A gene mutations were involved in amoxicillin resistance in the AmoxR isolates in this study, we evaluated all 77 amino acid substitutions in the acyl transpeptidase domain of PBP-1A, from amino acids 310 to 596. Seven amino acid changes were found to be significantly different between the AmoxS and AmoxR samples (Table 3), including Phe366 to Leu (x2 = 19.055; p <  0.001), Ser414 to Arg (x2 = 31.056; p <  0.001), Glu/Asn464–465 (x2 = 6.898; p = 0.009), Val469 to Met (x2 = 7.304; p = 0.021), Phe473 to Val (x2 = 21.223; p <  0.001), Asp479 to Glu (x2 = 4.060; p = 0.044), and Ser/Ala/Gly595–596 (x2 = 10.356; p = 0.001). In particular, two novel insertion mutations, Glu/Asn464–465 and Ser/Ala/Gly595–596, were discovered for the first time in this study, together with changes in Val469 to Met and Asp479 to Glu. These four novel, never-reported mutations were in or adjacent to the second (SKN402–404) and third (KTG555–557) conserved PBP motifs. The other three mutations, including Phe366 to Leu, Ser414 to Arg, and Phe473 to Val, have been documented [11, 13, 15].

Table 3 Relationships between amino acid substitution and amoxicillin susceptibility
Full size table

We noticed that the previously described amino acid changes, such as Glu406 to Ala (x2 = 0.017; p = 1.000), Ser417 to Thr (x2 = 0.291; p = 1.000), Thr556 to Ser (x2 = 0.895; p = 1.000), and Asn562 to Tyr (x2 = 4.338; p = 0.072), associated with a high level of beta-lactam resistance in acquired multidrug-resisting H. pylori [19] were insignificant in this population (Table 3). Additionally, other novel amino acid substitutions mentioned previously [13] in selected AmxR transformants comprising Thr540 to Ile, Ser542 to Arg, Thr555 to Ser, and Asn561 to Tyr were unchanged in this study. The results showed that several mutated positions had statistical significance between amoxicillin-sensitive and amoxicillin-resistant samples and were completely different from amino acid positions reported to be related to amoxicillin resistance published previously [15]. These mutations are adjacent to the second and third PBP motifs, which were observed only in AmxR H. pylori colonies after transformation [13].

Phylogenetic analyses of the pbp1A sequences

Phylogenetic analyses were performed on all pbp1A gene fragment sequences to determine whether the sequences with identified mutations were in the same group of sequences related to amoxicillin resistance. Trees were constructed from 85 sequences based on the pbp1A amplification fragments trimmed to 879 bp by the Tamura-Nei genetic distance model and the neighbour-joining tree building method (Geneious Prime® 2021.1.1). This primary phylogenetic analysis suggested that the pbp1A sequences obtained in the present study might belong to different sequence groups. The sequences from which H. pylori isolates showed resistance to amoxicillin could be combined into two groups with close relatedness to those from which H. pylori isolates were sensitive to amoxicillin, except for samples A003, A075, A138 and A163. These two groups (a, b) also shared the most recent common ancestor of the pbp1A gene (Fig. 3). Group (c) including sensitive strains was also created as a control group, along with 26,695 and Hagenberg strains.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenetic tree of 85 sequences of the pbp1A gene obtained in this study. Scale bars indicate the numbers of nucleotide substitutions per site. Red nodes/tips represent pbp1A nucleotide sequences from the clinical specimens in which H. pylori isolates showed resistance to amoxicillin

Full size image

Table 4 shows that groups (a) and (b) had very similar amino acid substitution and insertion profiles and were quite different from the reference sequences at the seven observed positions. There were four novel strains from our samples presenting single amino acid substitutions at Leu366 and Val473, as well as amino acid insertions at Glu/Asn464–465 and Ser/Ala/Gly595–596. The other two amino acid replacements (Met469 and Glu479) also appeared uniquely in our data when compared to the references. However, the presence of specific substitutions and insertions was present not only in the resistant samples but also in the sensitive samples. For example, Met469 appeared in just two sensitive strains (MIC values were equal to 0.016 and 0.023 μg/mL). Leu366 and Val473 also appeared in sensitive strains, but not the sensitive ones with MIC ≤0.016 μg/mL.

Table 4 Overview of amino acid differences in PBP1A proteins occurring in clinical samples with resistance and sensitivity to amoxicillin
Full size table

Discussion

Amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori is one of the greatest concerns of clinicians because anti-H. pylori regimens often consist of amoxicillin in addition to other antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors [20, 21]. Recent studies have suggested that amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori results from alterations in PBP1A [12, 13, 15, 22]. One of the main purposes of this study was to investigate the molecular mechanism of amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori strains collected from endoscopic biopsies in Vietnam.

The amoxicillin-resistant H. pylori proportion discovered in this study (25.7%) was similar to the finding by Saniee et al. in Iran (27.1%; p = 0.423) in 2018 [23] but significantly higher than that in other studies, such as Zerbetto et al. in Argentina (7.6%, p < 0.001) in 2017 [15], Manal et al. in Egypt (18.3%; p = 0.035) in 2018 [24], Ortis et al. in Central America (10%; p < 0.001) in 2019 [25], Azzaya et al. in Mongolia (11.9%; p < 0.001), Aumpan et al. in Cambodia (0%; p < 0.001) in 2020 [26, 27], Calinga-Ponce et al. in Mexico (1.8%; p < 0.001) and Li et al. in China (0%; p < 0.001) in 2021 [28, 29]. Compared to previous studies in Vietnam, the amoxicillin resistance proportion has been trending up significantly, for instance, from 0% (p < 0.001) in 2013 [30], 1.1% (p < 0.001) in 2015 [8], 10.4% (p < 0.001) in 2016 [9], 15% (p = 0.002) in 2019 [3] and to 25.7% in 2020 for this study. Although the previous local studies were different from each other regarding geographical areas, sample sizes, study period and antimicrobial testing methods, an increasing proportion of amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori in Vietnam has been generally demonstrated, suggesting that this is a serious emerging threat to the success of amoxicillin-based regimens. The high rate of amoxicillin-resisting H. pylori in our study might be explained by the fact that the combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium is often empirically prescribed for various infectious diseases [31]. The incorrect use of antimicrobials can accelerate the selection of drug-resistant strains [23].

Multiple strains of H. pylori can coinfect the same patient [32]. The coinfection detected by vacA genotype in our study presented a rate of 12.3%. A similar proportion in terms of coinfection determination was obtained when confirmed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting (12.5%; p = 0.500) [32] or through vacA and iceA genotyping (11.0%; p = 0.255) [33]. Therefore, coinfection needs to be excluded before evaluating the relationship between H. pylori genotypes and other factors, such as disease status and clinical symptoms, to maintain accuracy. Moreover, coinfection could undermine the success of eradication therapy and should be considered when interpreting the results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests [32].

Based on the H. pylori genotype analysis, our data showed an association between the vacAm1 genotype and gastric ulcers. This result suggests that individuals colonised with vacAm1-positive H. pylori strains are at an increased risk of developing gastric ulcers. These results confirmed the vacAm1 genotype is associated with an increased risk of peptic ulcers, which has been reported by Nguyen et al. [34] and Trang et al. [35] in Vietnam. Conversely, Milad et al. revealed that the vacAm2 genotype was significantly higher in patients with peptic ulcer disease than in patients with gastritis in Iran [36]. On the other hand, several previous studies published by Godoy et al. in Brazil and Loivukene et al. in Estonia did not find any association between virulence factors such as vacAm1 genotype and clinical outcomes or bacterial resistance to metronidazole, although the coinfection by multiple strains has been well considered in these studies [33, 37]. The difference in cagA and vacA genotype proportions as well as the association of these genotypes with the clinical outcomes might result from the fact that various populations have been evaluated with different ethnic groups and that a high genetic variability of strains in different countries exists [38, 39]. However, there is universal agreement regarding the role of the vacAm1 genotype among studies carried out in Vietnam at different time points. In addition, we did not find any association between the virulence factors and resistance to amoxicillin.

Amino acid substitutions in the acyl transpeptidase domain of PBP1A are required for resistance to amoxicillin [12, 13], especially F473L alteration recently discovered to be the important genetic determinant of resistance to amoxicillin of H. pylori in Cambodia [40]. However, other mechanisms could be involved in increasing the MIC value and contributing to the levels of high AmxR strains, such as decreasing membrane permeability due to altered porin proteins (HopC, HopH), increasing the activity of efflux pumps to eject antibiotics from the periplasm, or even reducing the binding of antibiotics to other PBPs, especially PBP2 [19, 41].

In this study, we discovered a high rate of resistance to amoxicillin. To identify the mutations of pbp1A responsible for amoxicillin resistance, sequences of the pbp1A gene were analysed. We found seven amino acid changes possibly linked to amoxicillin resistance in clinical samples. Among them, the Ser414 to Arg substitution has been proven to be the main factor in amoxicillin resistance of the Hardenberg strain by site-directed mutagenesis [12] and it was also common in clinical AmxR strains by natural transformation [11, 13]. The Phe366 to Leu alteration was reported to be present in the clinical AmxR strain SZ79 in combination with the Ser414 to Arg substitution [13]. Phe473 was recognised in strains sensitive to but less susceptible to amoxicillin but also in AmxR transformants in the absence of Ser414 to Arg substitutions [15], while Val473 was common in our AmxR samples in the context of Ser414 to Arg changes. Although it has become clear that amino acid variations conferring resistance vary by the geographical origins of the strains [15], these data have confirmed the combination of amino acid substitutions or mutations in multiple loci to amoxicillin resistance [13].

To investigate the relatedness, as well as the combination of different mutations of pbp1A sequences in the resistance to amoxicillin, we created a phylogenetic tree of 85 obtained pbp1A gene fragments. The grouping of the pbp1A gene sequences suggested that there were other mechanisms in addition to the mutations in the pbp1A gene contributing to amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori in Vietnam. Other studies have also shown that distinct mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance also play important roles in the resistance to amoxicillin in H. pylori [13].

Our study had several limitations. First, resistant mutations were not identified directly from isolates but only from gastric biopsy specimens. We excluded coinfection cases from the data analysis, and this approach might not be ideal for identifying the molecular mechanisms related to amoxicillin resistance. Second, the role of other genes that could have synergistic effects in amoxicillin resistance could not be excluded. We did not evaluate coinfection by multiple H. pylori strains by fingerprinting methods such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) or multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Last but not least, resistance has not been confirmed to have a direct correlation with eradication efficacy in real-life practice.

However, the strength of this study is that it was conducted at one of the largest hospitals in southern Vietnam, which usually admits patients from Ho Chi Minh City and many nearby areas. This is the first study that reported mutations related to AmxR H. pylori in Vietnamese patients and it has identified some novel mutations, especially insertion mutations Glu/Asn464–465 and Ser/Ala/Gly595–596 in the pbp1A gene and other nearby mutations, which are likely specific to H. pylori strains in Vietnamese. Further studies are required to validate the role of these novel mutations in conferring amoxicillin resistance. In addition to the emerging prevalence of amoxicillin-resistant H. pylori strains, direct detection of pbp1A gene mutations from H. pylori-positive biopsy specimens may lead to novel diagnostic strategies for amoxicillin resistance determination and would be useful in clinical practice. More importantly, other mechanisms, such as the acquisition or expression of β-lactamase or changes in other proteins involved in cell wall synthesis, such as PBP2, PBP3, and PBP4, should also be evaluated.

Conclusion

Our study has identified new mutations that are statistically associated with amoxicillin resistance and demonstrated the importance of the detection of amoxicillin-resistant Helicobacter pylori in clinical practice because of the emergence of these strains in Vietnam. However, further studies should be carried out to identify additional mechanisms contributing to amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori.

Availability of data and materials

The detail data and materials available on request (anh.nt@umc.edu.vn).

References

  1. Wroblewski LE, Peek RM Jr, Wilson KT. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: factors that modulate disease risk. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(4):713–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rahman R, Asombang AW, Ibdah JA. Characteristics of gastric cancer in Asia. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(16):4483–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Khien VV, Thang DM, Hai TM, Duat NQ, Khanh PH, Ha DT, et al. Management of antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori infection: perspectives from Vietnam. Gut Liver. 2019;13(5):483–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Quach DT, Vilaichone RK, Vu KV, Yamaoka Y, Sugano K, Mahachai V. Helicobacter pylori infection and related gastrointestinal diseases in southeast Asian countries: an expert opinion survey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(12):3565–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee YC, Chiang TH, Chou CK, Tu YK, Liao WC, Wu MS, et al. Association between Helicobacter pylori eradication and gastric cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(5):1113–1124 e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O'Morain CA, Gisbert JP, Kuipers EJ, Axon AT, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht V/Florence consensus report. Gut. 2017;66(1):6–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dang NQH, Ha TMT, Nguyen ST, Le NDK, Nguyen TMT, Nguyen TH, et al. High rates of clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance of Helicobacter pylori in patients with chronic gastritis in the south east area of Vietnam. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;22:620–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Phan TN, Santona A, Tran VH, Tran TN, Le VA, Cappuccinelli P, et al. High rate of levofloxacin resistance in a background of clarithromycin- and metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori in Vietnam. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;45(3):244–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quek C, Pham ST, Tran KT, Pham BT, Huynh LV, Luu NB, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and clarithromycin resistance patterns of Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates in Vietnam. F1000Res. 2016;5:671.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Matteo MJ, Granados G, Olmos M, Wonaga A, Catalano M. Helicobacter pylori amoxicillin heteroresistance due to point mutations in PBP-1A in isogenic isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61(3):474–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rimbara E, Noguchi N, Kawai T, Sasatsu M. Mutations in penicillin-binding proteins 1, 2 and 3 are responsible for amoxicillin resistance in Helicobacter pylori. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61(5):995–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerrits MM, Schuijffel D, van Zwet AA, Kuipers EJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Kusters JG. Alterations in penicillin-binding protein 1A confer resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(7):2229–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerrits MM, Godoy AP, Kuipers EJ, Ribeiro ML, Stoof J, Mendonca S, et al. Multiple mutations in or adjacent to the conserved penicillin-binding protein motifs of the penicillin-binding protein 1A confer amoxicillin resistance to Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter. 2006;11(3):181–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paul R, Postius S, Melchers K, Schafer KP. Mutations of the Helicobacter pylori genes rdxA and pbp1 cause resistance against metronidazole and amoxicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(3):962–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zerbetto De Palma G, Mendiondo N, Wonaga A, Viola L, Ibarra D, Campitelli E, et al. Occurrence of mutations in the antimicrobial target genes related to levofloxacin, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolates from Buenos Aires City. Microb Drug Resist. 2017;23(3):351–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tran VH, Ha TMT, Le PTQ, Phan TN, Tran TNH. Characterisation of point mutations in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene of clinical Helicobacter pylori strains and clarithromycin-resistant phenotype in Central Vietnam. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019;16:87–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blanchard TG, Nedrud JG. Laboratory maintenance of Helicobacter species. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2012;Chapter 8:Unit8B 1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Trung TT, Minh TA, Anh NT. Value of CIM, CLO test and multiplex PCR for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection status in patients with gastritis and gastric ulcer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(11):3497–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwon DH, Dore MP, Kim JJ, Kato M, Lee M, Wu JY, et al. High-level beta-lactam resistance associated with acquired multidrug resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(7):2169–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Liyen Cartelle A, Uy PP, Koehler TE, Yap JEL. Persistent Helicobacter pylori infection: an insight to the limitations of current clinical practice. Cureus. 2020;12(12):e12309.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gisbert JP. Empirical or susceptibility-guided treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection? A comprehensive review. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2020;13:1756284820968736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Okamoto T, Yoshiyama H, Nakazawa T, Park ID, Chang MW, Yanai H, et al. A change in PBP1 is involved in amoxicillin resistance of clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50(6):849–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Saniee P, Hosseini F, Kadkhodaei S, Siavoshi F, Khalili-Samani S. Helicobacter pylori multidrug resistance due to misuse of antibiotics in Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2018;21(7):283–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Diab M, El-Shenawy A, El-Ghannam M, Salem D, Abdelnasser M, Shaheen M, et al. Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes of Helicobacter pylori strains to clarithromycin, metronidazole, amoxicillin and tetracycline among Egyptian patients. Egypt J Med Human Geneti. 2018;19(4):417–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ortiz V, Estevez-Ordonez D, Montalvan-Sanchez E, Urrutia-Argueta S, Israel D, Krishna US, et al. Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic consumption in the low-resource Central America setting. Helicobacter. 2019;24(4):e12595.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Azzaya D, Gantuya B, Oyuntsetseg K, Davaadorj D, Matsumoto T, Akada J, et al. High antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori and its associated novel gene mutations among the Mongolian population. Microorganisms. 2020;8(7):1062.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Aumpan N, Vilaichone RK, Gamnarai P, Sanglutong L, Ratanachu-Ek T, Mahachai V, et al. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance patterns of Helicobacter pylori infection in Koh Kong, Cambodia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020;21(5):1409–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Camorlinga-Ponce M, Gomez-Delgado A, Aguilar-Zamora E, Torres RC, Giono-Cerezo S, Escobar-Ogaz A, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic antibiotic resistance patterns in Helicobacter pylori strains from ethnically diverse population in Mexico. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:539115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li J, Deng J, Wang Z, Li H, Wan C. Antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from pediatric patients in Southwest China. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:621791.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Binh TT, Shiota S, Nguyen LT, Ho DD, Hoang HH, Ta L, et al. The incidence of primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Vietnam. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(3):233–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Nguyen NV, Do NTT, Nguyen CTK, Tran TK, Ho PD, Nguyen HH, et al. Community-level consumption of antibiotics according to the AWaRe (access, watch, reserve) classification in rural Vietnam. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2020;2(3):dlaa048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Seo JW, Park JY, Shin TS, Kim JG. The analysis of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance between Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from gastric antrum and body. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Godoy AP, Ribeiro ML, Benvengo YH, Vitiello L, Miranda Mde C, Mendonca S, et al. Analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence factors in Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates. BMC Gastroenterol. 2003;3:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Nguyen TL, Uchida T, Tsukamoto Y, Trinh DT, Ta L, Mai BH, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastroduodenal diseases in Vietnam: a cross-sectional, hospital-based study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Trang TT, Shiota S, Matsuda M, Binh TT, Suzuki R, Vilaichone RK, et al. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori virulence factors in Bhutan, Vietnam, and Myanmar is related to gastric cancer incidence. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:830813.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Milad SSA, Korosh A, Reza A, Ghorbanali R, Yousef M, Rana F, et al. Frequency of virulence-associated genotypes of Helicobacter pylori and their correlation with clinical outcome and histological parameters in infected patients. Heliyon. 2021;7:e07610 CelPress.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Loivukene K, Kolk H, Maaroos HI, Kasenomm P, Ustav M, Mikelsaar M. Metronidazole and clarithromycin susceptibility and the subtypes of vacA of Helicobacter pylori isolates in Estonia. Scand J Infect Dis. 2000;32(1):59–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Feliciano O, Gutierrez O, Valdes L, Fragoso T, Calderin AM, Valdes AE, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori vacA, cagA, and iceA genotypes in Cuban patients with upper gastrointestinal diseases. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:753710.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Akeel M, Shehata A, Elhafey A, Elmakki E, Aboshouk T, Ageely H, et al. Helicobacter pylori vacA, cagA and iceA genotypes in dyspeptic patients from southwestern region, Saudi Arabia: distribution and association with clinical outcomes and histopathological changes. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Vo PT, Narith D, Tshibangu-Kabamba E, Ho DQD, Pham TV, Sokomoth S, et al. A next-generation sequencing-based approach to identify genetic determinants of antibiotic resistance in Cambodian Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Qureshi NN, Gallaher B, Schiller NL. Evolution of amoxicillin resistance of Helicobacter pylori in vitro: characterization of resistance mechanisms. Microb Drug Resist. 2014;20(6):509–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We highly appreciate support from University Medical Center 1 & 2 in Ho Chi Minh City.

Funding

This study was supported by a research grant (reference number: 51/2019/HĐ-QPTKHCN) from the Department of Science and Technology Ho Chi Minh City (DOST HCMC) Vietnam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Trung Thien Tran & Minh Anh Tran

  2. Molecular Biomedical Center, University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Anh Tuan Nguyen, Danh Thanh Nguyen & Kha Dong Ngo

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Duc Trong Quach

  4. Department of Genetics, University of Science, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Dao Thi-Hong Pham, Uyen Thi-Hong Nguyen, An Nguyen-Thanh Dang & Vy Thuy Nguyen

  5. Department of Microbiology-Parasitology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Nga Minh Cao

  6. University Medical Center – Campus 2, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Loc Huu Quach & Khiem Thien Tran

  7. Department of Endoscopy, University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Nhan Quang Le, Viet Van Ung & Minh Ngoc-Quoc Vo

  8. Department of Oral Biology, Yonsei University College of Density, Seoul, South Korea

    Trung Le Tran

Authors
  1. Trung Thien Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anh Tuan Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Duc Trong Quach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dao Thi-Hong Pham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nga Minh Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Uyen Thi-Hong Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. An Nguyen-Thanh Dang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Minh Anh Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Loc Huu Quach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Khiem Thien Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Nhan Quang Le
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Viet Van Ung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Minh Ngoc-Quoc Vo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Danh Thanh Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Kha Dong Ngo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Trung Le Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Vy Thuy Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TTT, ATN and NMC designed the experiment. TTT, MAT, LHQ, KTT, NQL, VVU, MNQV collected gastric biopsies and performed clinical diagnosis. ATN, DTHP, UTHN, ANTD, DTN and KDN conducted the experiment, analysed the samples and performed data analysis. ATN carried out data interpretation and produced the first draft of the manuscript. DTQ, TLT and VTN contributed to drafting and editing the manuscripts critically. All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscripts.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anh Tuan Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committees of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (reference number: 374/ĐHYD-HĐĐĐ, signed on 30/07/2019. All participants provided written informed consent. This work was carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for Experiments in Humans.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tran, T.T., Nguyen, A.T., Quach, D.T. et al. Emergence of amoxicillin resistance and identification of novel mutations of the pbp1A gene in Helicobacter pylori in Vietnam. BMC Microbiol 22, 41 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02463-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02463-8

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us