Skip to main content

SaQuant: a real-time PCR assay for quantitative assessment of Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract

Background

Molecular assays are important tools for pathogen detection but need to be periodically re-evaluated with the discovery of additional genetic diversity that may cause assays to exclude target taxa or include non-target taxa. A single well-developed assay can find broad application across research, clinical, and industrial settings. Pathogen prevalence within a population is estimated using such assays and accurate results are critical for formulating effective public health policies and guiding future research. A variety of assays for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus are currently available. The utility of commercial assays for research is limited, given proprietary signatures and lack of transparent validation.

Results

In silico testing of existing peer-reviewed assays show that most suffer from a lack of sensitivity and specificity. We found no assays that were specifically designed and validated for quantitative use. Here we present a qPCR assay, SaQuant, for the detection and quantification of S. aureus as might be collected on sampling swabs. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay was 95.6 and 99.9 %, respectively, with a limit of detection of between 3 and 5 genome equivalents and a limit of quantification of 8.27 genome equivalents. The presence of DNA from non-target species likely to be found in a swab sample, did not impact qualitative or quantitative abilities of the assay.

Conclusions

This assay has the potential to serve as a valuable tool for the accurate detection and quantification of S. aureus collected from human body sites in order to better understand the dynamics of prevalence and transmission in community settings.

Peer Review reports

Background

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium that lives in close association with humans as both a commensal and pathogen. When these bacteria penetrate the outer layers of skin or mucosa, they can cause skin, soft-tissue, bone, joint, respiratory, and endovascular infections [1]. In the US, S. aureus caused almost 120,000 bloodstream infections and 20,000 associated deaths in a single year [2] and is typically the most common cause of skin and soft tissue infections [3].

Strict infection controls in hospital settings appear to be slowly reducing hospital acquired (HA) methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection rates. In contrast, community acquired (CA) MRSA infections increased and have remained steady since 2008 [2]. In some settings, methicillin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) infections outnumber MRSA infections 3 to 1, are increasing nationally, and therefore cannot be ignored [4, 5]. Indeed, MSSA carriage rates in the population are some 20-fold higher than MRSA carriage rates [6,7,8].

To better understand and mitigate S. aureus spread and infection, research has increasingly focused on identifying segments of the population likely to be carriers and thus at greater risk for autoinfection and transmission to others. Lower socioeconomic status has been linked to S. aureus infections and reflected in ethnic, race, and education disparities [9,10,11]. Colonization rates also differ among ethnic and racial groups [12, 13], however socioeconomic status does not appear to impact colonization status [12]. Longitudinal studies suggest that approximately 20 % of healthy individuals are persistently colonized, carry higher loads, and are at higher risk for developing infections [6, 7]. Sex and age have also been attributed to the likelihood of colonization [13, 14]. Our understanding of carriage in the population is almost completely based on culturing after swabbing. Quantitative assessments have mostly been restricted to culture-based enumeration which is time consuming and low-throughput. Furthermore, because growth in transport media often precludes quantitative assessments [15,16,17], approaches must be performed immediately after collection, unless the swab is stored at -70oC [18]. Recent work comparing 16 S rRNA gene sequencing to culturing, suggests that culture based methods are likely to lead to false negative results when absolute abundance of S. aureus is low [19]. The finding that females often have a lower absolute abundance than males has important implications for our understanding of the observed sex-based disparity in nasal carriage [7, 19,20,21,22]. Large-scale quantitative assessments may shed further light on defining persistent carriers and the risk of autoinfection and transmission if individuals with higher loads shed these bacteria more frequently and in greater abundance.

Quantitative PCR presents a rapid, high throughput, culture-independent, and highly-sensitive method for detection and quantification of S. aureus that can be performed directly on DNA extracted from collection swabs. A number of PCR assays have been developed for both research and commercial purposes, however commercial assays are typically difficult to evaluate as signatures are proprietary and published metrics are often neither transparent nor peer-reviewed. Other assays were not purposed for quantitative assessment or were evaluated using limited in silico data compared to the data available today [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Here we report on the design and evaluation of SaQuant, a novel qPCR assay intended for the accurate detection and quantification of S. aureus from sampling swabs.

Results

Assay efficiency

The assay yielded an average efficiency of 93.38 % across four separate standard curve serial dilution experiments, with an r2 > 0.999 in each case.

Assay sensitivity and specificity

Assay sensitivity, the degree to which true positives are correctly detected, was calculated as 95.6 % from in silico comparisons which included exact matches to 1,738 of 1,818 S. aureus genomes (Table 1). Wet-bench assessment yielded a sensitivity value of 100 % and included amplification of 533 of 533 S. aureus isolates.

Table 1 In silico assessment of SaQuant and other S. aureus-specific assays

Assay specificity, the percentage of true negatives that are correctly excluded, included in silico and wet-bench assessments. In silico comparisons of 1,834 genomes from other species in the genus Staphylococcus suggest predicted amplification in only 1 genome (GCA_003185095.1_Staphylococcus_pseudintermedius_ST525_1), resulting in a specificity of 99.95 % (Tables 1 and 2). For this S. pseudintermedius genome, our assay predicted an amplicon on a single short contig of 339 nucleotides in length which also had a 100 % match to other S. aureus genomes. Reads were not available for this genome. We suspect that this genome is contaminated by S. aureus. Wet-bench testing of 10 strains from 7 non-aureus Staphylococcus species (Table 3) resulted in no amplification.

Table 2 In silico comparison of SaQuant to non - S. aureus genomes within the genus Staphylococcus
Table 3 Species used for wet-bench testing of SaQuant specificity

Assay limit of detection and limit of quantification

At concentrations of three and five genomic equivalents, respectively 17/20 (85 %) and 19/20 (95 %) replicates were detected. Thus, the assay’s LoD lies between 3 and 5 copies, or approximately 9.07 × 10− 5 ng and 1.51 × 10− 4 ng. Lower S. aureus amounts can still be detected, albeit at less than the desired confidence level of 95 %. Given our parameters, the assay recorded an LoQ of 2.5 × 10− 5 ng, or approximately 8.27 genomic equivalents, with a Ct value standard deviation of 0.73 across 8 dilution replicates.

S. aureus detection in complex community samples

All nine community samples were S. aureus culture-negative and confirmed by 16 S rRNA sequencing to contain bacterial DNA. The DNA load for each of the samples was quantified using an Invitrogen Qubit 4 fluorometer and ranged from 1.24 to 21.9 ng/µl for samples from the throat and nose. DNA loads on the three samples collected from hands (palm) were too low to detect (Table S1). Each complex sample and S. aureus template combination was assayed in triplicate. For all but a single sample, S. aureus was detectable at the level of 1 GE (at least one replicate amplified). At this concentration, only one community sample amplified in all three of the replicates; 5 samples amplified in only one replicate while 2 amplified in two replicates. At the amounts of 100 and 10,000 GEs, every sample yielded a quantifiable result. Overall, quantification of the spiked S. aureus DNA via SaQuant was very similar to the amount spiked into each sample (Table S1).

The variation of quantification values within triplicate sets decreased with the amount of spiked DNA. Absolute quantification values are indicated in Table S1. Control samples (with no added S. aureus DNA) did not amplify.

Discussion

In silico testing of this assay included all publicly available genome assemblies of S. aureus and other Staphylococcus species and represent the most comprehensive testing of any S. aureus assay to date. In silico comparisons of sensitivity and specificity to previously published assays suggest that our assay is likely to perform better than others. The SYBR Green assay (Assay #4 in Table 1) published by Paule et al. [29], has a slightly higher predicted sensitivity, but lacks a probe, making specificity a concern, and the amplicon size is larger than optimal. Our assessment excluded commercial assays that incorporate proprietary genomic signatures. While quantification may be possible with other assays, our assay was developed and assessed specifically to address the need for research studies that quantify the colonizing load of S. aureus in community-based population studies of prevalence and transmission. Wet-bench assessment of this assay indicates an LoD of 3–5 copies (near the theoretical limit for qPCR detection), and an LoQ of ~ 8 copies. In silico and wet bench testing focused on determining the potential for false positive amplification of closely related species, especially those that may be prevalent in human swab samples. These non-aureus samples were tested at template amounts of 1 ng per reaction, a concentration that is considerably higher than expected on a swab sample, providing a rigorous screening of possible false positive amplification. Wet-bench application of the assay to swabs from three body sites evidenced the assay’s specificity in the context of complex communities. Furthermore, these experiments demonstrate the assay’s resilience to PCR inhibition that can be caused when the amount of DNA in a reaction is high. Our results suggest that in a complex sample as might be found on a swab, this assay excels at accurately detecting and quantifying low levels of S. aureus, and discriminating the target species from other common and related species. Although we have envisioned the assay’s application primarily in the research setting, we recognize its potential usefulness elsewhere, e.g. as a clinical detection method, or in food quality control where cell viability is not guaranteed.

Conclusions

Quantity of S. aureus colonizing human body sites is likely to be central to the probability of transmission and auto-infection. An accurate and high-throughput means of quantifying S. aureus directly from human samples without culturing will provide an important tool to better understand the epidemiology of this pathogen. To this end, we present a quantitative PCR assay with high sensitivity and specificity and validated in complex microbial samples such as those found in the human nares and throat.

Methods

In silico assay design

All genome assemblies annotated as Staphylococcus (n = 17,883) were downloaded from Genbank on July 6, 2020 with the ncbi-genome-download tool (https://github.com/kblin/ncbi-genome-download). Duplicate genomes were removed with the assembly-dereplicator tool (https://github.com/rrwick/Assembly-Dereplicator) at a similarity threshold of 99.9 %, resulting in a set of 3,652 unique genomes. De-replicated genome assemblies were aligned against S. aureus NCTC9752 (LS483310) with NUCmer v3.1 [34] in conjunction with NASP v1.2.0 [35]. A phylogeny was inferred on a concatenated alignment of 7,492 SNPs with FastTree v2.1.8 [36]. The phylogeny was used to speciate S. aureus from other species. Of these 3,652 genomes annotated as Staphylococcus, 1,818 were S. aureus.

The core genome of S. aureus was calculated with the large-scale Blast score ratio (LS-BSR) tool [37] on a set of 1,818 genomes, using cd-hit v4.8.1 [38] for clustering and blat v36 × 2 [39] for alignment. The core genome consists of those coding region sequences (CDSs) that have a blast score ratio (BSR) value [40] of > 0.8 across all S. aureus genomes. The core genome (n = 4,892 CDSs) was then aligned against all Staphylococcus genomes with LS-BSR and CDSs unique to S. aureus were identified; these CDSs had a BSR value ≤ 0.4 in all non-target genomes. PCR primers were designed for unique signatures with Primer3 v2.3.6 (PMID: 22,730,293). The primers were then visually compared to multiple sequence alignments of the target CDS with JalView [41]. Degeneracies were added to the primer forward primer and probe sequences to capture diversity across S. aureus.

The assay employs a forward primer (5’ AACTACTAGGGGAGCCTAATRAT 3’), a reverse primer (5’ GGTACTAACCAAATCAGGTCATAA 3’) and a TaqMan TAMRA probe (5’ TGGCTGAGATGAAYTGTTCAGACCC 3’). The assay has an amplicon size of 73 base pairs, and targets a region within a 132 bp long hypothetical protein coding sequence (NCBI Protein accession number: YP_500811.1).

Culturing and DNA extraction

Community [42] and clinical samples of S. aureus stored in glycerol stocks were thawed, streaked for isolation onto CHROMagar media, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Colonies appearing pink to mauve were selected and cultured for another 24 h at 37 °C on CHROMagar before DNA extraction. To determine assay specificity, glycerol stocks of seven different species of Staphylococcus were cultured on blood agar (TSA + 5 % sheep blood) and grown at 37 °C for 24–26 h. Isolated colonies were added to an enzymatic lysis buffer before final extraction. DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNEasy Blood and Tissue Extraction kit. Extraction quantity was determined using an Invitrogen Qubit 4 fluorometer.

Assay conditions

We independently varied primer annealing temperature, and primer and probe concentrations to optimize assay conditions for increased efficiency and reduced the likelihood of false amplification. After optimization, real time qPCR was run in 10 µl reactions using 5 µl of Applied Biosystems TaqMan Universal PCR MasterMix, 1 µM of forward primer, 1 µM of reverse primer, 200 nM of TaqMan TAMRA probe, and 1 µl of template. Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: hot start TaqMan activation (10 min at 95 °C), followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (15 s at 95 °C) and extension (1 min at 57 °C).

Assay validation

We measured sensitivity by calculating the percentage of S. aureus isolates or genomes that were correctly identified by the assay. Wet-bench determination of sensitivity included testing against 533 S. aureus isolates collected in Yuma, Arizona [42] and sequenced to verify species designation. In silico assessment of sensitivity for this and other S. aureus assays involved an in silico PCR screen against 1,818 S. aureus genomes (Table 1) using vipr (https://github.com/TGenNorth/vipr). A hit was recorded for exact matches to both primers and the probe. To determine assay specificity, we calculated the percentage of non - S. aureus isolates or genomes that were correctly identified as such by the assay. In silico assessment of specificity was also performed using vipr against 1,834 genomes that were annotated as Staphylococcus, but are not S. aureus (Tables 1 and 2). Wet-bench assessment included 10 strains from 7 Staphylococcus species that were not S. aureus (Table 3).

We determined assay efficiency, the extent to which the template DNA is doubled every cycle, by averaging the efficiency values from four separate experiments, each with a standard curve constructed from five serial dilutions. We defined the limit of detection (LoD) as the least amount of analyte that amplified at least 95 % of the time and approximated this value by determining the amount of DNA present when 19 of 20 replicates amplified at less than 40 cycles, with uniform curve morphology, and with no amplification of the negative control [43]. The limit of quantification (LoQ) of this assay is the smallest amount of analyte that can be detected and quantified with an acceptable probability and level of accuracy. Here, we defined LoQ as the least amount of analyte that amplified 8 out of 8 times, and whose amplification curves had a cycle threshold (Ct) value standard deviation (σ) of less than 0.8.

We conducted proof-of-principle experiments to emulate S. aureus detection from complex bacterial communities by spiking S. aureus DNA into samples collected via swabs from different body sites. A total of nine complex samples were used, consisting of three human nares swabs, three human throat swabs, and three human palm swabs. These swabs were all paired with a swab collected from the same body site from the same person, but were used for culture-based detection of S. aureus. The swab samples representing complex samples were chosen for qPCR detection of S. aureus because their pair was culture-negative suggesting that only spiked S. aureus DNA would be present. DNA from these swabs was extracted with a Qiagen DNEasy Blood and Tissue Extraction kit and quantified with an Invitrogen Qubit 4 fluorometer. These nine community samples were each divided into twelve aliquots: three no spike controls, three aliquots into which 1 genome equivalent (GE) of template was added, three aliquots into which 100 GEs of template were added, and three aliquots into which 10,000 GEs of template were added. Each replicate was assayed, and amplification was quantified via standard curve analysis, using the Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 12 software package.

Availability of data and materials

All data analyzed during this study include all genome assemblies annotated as Staphylococcus (n = 17,883) that were downloaded from Genbank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/?term=staphylococcus) on July 6, 2020. Data generated in this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information file.

Abbreviations

HA:

Hospital acquired

MRSA:

Methicillin resistant S. aureus

CA:

Community acquired

MSSA:

Methicillin sensitive S. aureus

LoD:

Limit of detection

LoQ:

Limit of quantification

Ct:

Cycle threshold

GE:

Genome equivalent

References

  1. 1.

    Williams REO. Healthy carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: its prevalence and importance. Bacteriol Rev. 1963;27:56–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kourtis AP, Hatfield K, Baggs J, Mu Y, See I, Epson E, et al. Vital signs: epidemiology and recent trends in methicillin-resistant and in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections - United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68:214–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, et al. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:666–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lowy FD. Medical progress - Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:520–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Klein EY, Mojica N, Jiang W, Cosgrove SE, Septimus E, Morgan DJ, et al. Trends in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hospitalizations in the United States, 2010-2014. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:1921–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kluytmans J, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10(3):505–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wertheim HFL, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, et al. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(12):751–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gorwitz RJ, Kruszon‐Moran D, McAllister SK, McQuillan G, McDougal LK, Fosheim GE, et al. Changes in the prevalence of nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2001–2004. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:1226–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    See I, Wesson P, Gualandi N, Dumyati G, Harrison LH, Lesher L, et al. Socioeconomic factors explain racial disparities in invasive community-associated methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus disease rates. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tosas Auguet O, Betley JR, Stabler RA, Patel A, Ioannou A, Marbach H, et al. Evidence for community transmission of community-associated but not health-care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains linked to social and material deprivation: spatial analysis of cross-sectional data. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1001944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Oestergaard LB, Schmiegelow MD, Bruun NE, Skov RL, Petersen A, Andersen PS, et al. The associations between socioeconomic status and risk of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and subsequent endocarditis – a Danish nationwide cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Barger SD, Lininger MR, Trotter RT 2nd, Wayment HA, Mbegbu M, Kyman S, Pearson T. Educational Attainment and Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in a Hispanic Border Community: Testing Fundamental Cause Theory. mSphere. 2020;5(5):e00623-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00623-20.

  13. 13.

    Kuehnert MJ, Kruszon-Moran D, Hill HA, McQuillan G, McAllister SK, Fosheim G, et al. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in the United States, 2001-2002. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:172–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sangvik M, Olsen RS, Olsen K, Simonsen GS, Furberg AS, Sollid JUE. Age- and gender-associated Staphylococcus aureus spa types found among nasal carriers in a general population: the Tromsø Staph and Skin Study. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:4213–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    White A. Quantitative studies of nasal carriers of staphylococci among hospitalized patients. J Clin Invest. 1961;40:23–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nouwen JL, Ott A, Kluytmans-Vandenbergh MFQ, Boelens HAM, Hofman A, van Belkum A, et al. Predicting the Staphylococcus aureus nasal carrier state: Derivation and validation of a “culture rule”. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:806–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    van Belkum A, Verkaik NJ, de Vogel CP, Boelens HA, Verveer J, Nouwen JL, et al. Reclassification of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage types. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:1820–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Panisello Yagüe D, Mihaljevic J, Mbegbu M, Wood C, Hepp C, Kyman S, et al. Survival of Staphylococcus aureus on sampling swabs stored at different temperatures. J Appl Microbiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15023.

  19. 19.

    Liu CM, Price LB, Hungate BA, Abraham AG, Larsen LA, Christensen K, et al. Staphylococcus aureus and the ecology of the nasal microbiome. Sci Adv. 2015;1:e1400216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Andersen PS, Pedersen JK, Fode P, Skov RL, Fowler VG, Stegger M, et al. Influence of host genetics and environment on nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in Danish middle-aged and elderly twins. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:1178–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Munckhof WJ, Nimmo GR, Schooneveldt JM, Schlebusch S, Stephens AJ, Williams G, et al. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, including community-associated methicillin-resistant strains, in Queensland adults. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15:149–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Olsen K, Falch BM, Danielsen K, Johannessen M, Ericson Sollid JU, Thune I, et al. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage is associated with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, gender and smoking status. The Tromsø Staph and Skin Study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:465–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Velasco V, Sherwood JS, Rojas-García PP, Logue CM. Multiplex real-time PCR for detection of Staphylococcus aureus, mecA and Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) genes from selective enrichments from animals and retail meat. PLoS One. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097617.

  24. 24.

    Wada M, Lkhagvadorj E, Bian L, Wang C, Chiba Y, Nagata S, et al. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay for the rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Appl Microbiol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04476.x.

  25. 25.

    Botaro BG, Cortinhas CS, Março LV, Moreno JFG, Silva LFP, Benites NR, et al. Detection and enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine milk samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96:6955–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Goto M, Takahashi H, Segawa Y, Hayashidani H, Takatori K, Hara-Kudo Y. Real-time PCR method for quantification of Staphylococcus aureus in milk. J Food Prot. 2007;70:90–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Galia L, Ligozzi M, Bertoncelli A, Mazzariol A. Real-time PCR assay for detection of staphylococcus aureus, panton-valentine leucocidin and methicillin resistance directly from clinical samples. AIMS Microbiol. 2019;5:138–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nakagawa S, Taneike I, Mimura D, Iwakura N, Nakayama T, Emura T, et al. Gene sequences and specific detection for Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;328:995–1002.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Paule SM, Pasquariello AC, Hacek DM, Fisher AG, Thomson RB, Kaul KL, et al. Direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus from adult and neonate nasal swab specimens using real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Mol Diagn. 2004;6:191–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Brakstad OG, Aasbakk K, Maeland JA. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30(7):1654–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Martineau F, Picard FJ, Roy PH, Ouellette M, Bergeron MG. Species-specific and ubiquitous-DNA-based assays for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:618–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ghodousi A, Nomanpour B, Davoudi S, Maleknejad P, Omrani M, Kashef N, et al. Application of fnbA gene as new target for the species-specific and quantitative detection of Staphylococcus aureus directly from lower respiratory tract specimens by real time PCR. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2012;55:490–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kobayashi N, Wu H, Kojima K, Taniguchi K, Urasawa S, Uehara N, et al. Detection of mecA, femA, and femB genes in clinical strains of staphylococci using polymerase chain reaction. Epidemiol Infect. 1994;113:259–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Delcher AL, Salzberg SL, Phillippy AM. Using MUMmer to identify similar regions in large sequence sets. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2003;Chapter 10:Unit 10.3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sahl JW, Lemmer D, Travis J, Schupp JM, Gillece JD, Aziz M, et al. NASP: an accurate, rapid method for the identification of SNPs in WGS datasets that supports flexible input and output formats. Microb Genom. 2016;2(8):e000074.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sahl JW, Caporaso JG, Rasko DA, Keim P. The large-scale blast score ratio (LS-BSR) pipeline: a method to rapidly compare genetic content between bacterial genomes. PeerJ. 2014;2:e332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1658–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kent WJ. BLAT---the BLAST-Like Alignment Tool. Genome Res. 2002;12:656–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rasko DA, Myers GSA, Ravel J. Visualization of comparative genomic analyses by BLAST score ratio. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview version 2-A multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pearson T, Barger SD, Lininger M, Wayment H, Hepp C, Villa F, et al. Health disparities in Staphylococcus aureus transmission and carriage in a border region of the United States based on cultural differences in social relationships: protocol for a survey study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8:e14853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Klymus KE, Merkes CM, Allison MJ, Goldberg CS, Helbing CC, Hunter ME, et al. Reporting the limits of detection and quantification for environmental DNA assays. Environ DNA. 2020;2:271–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the NAU Southwest Health Equity Research Collaborative, which is funded by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities at the National Institutes of Health (U54MD012388). Funding was also received from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health (R15AI156771).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CW, JB and TP conceived of the study. JS discovered the signature and designed the assay. CW, JS, and TP designed the experiments. JB and TP provided materials. CW, JS, SM, BC, BR and DP collected data. All authors analyzed data. CW and TP wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and provided critical revisions. TP obtained funding. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talima Pearson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Samples tested in this work were collected as a part of projects 1174059 and 1116783 approved by the Northern Arizona University (NAU) Institutional Review Board (IRB). For 1174059, the NAU IRB determined that the project did not constitute human subject research and therefore consent/assent was not obtained. For 1116783, verbal consent or assent was obtained in order to maintain anonymity.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wood, C., Sahl, J., Maltinsky, S. et al. SaQuant: a real-time PCR assay for quantitative assessment of Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Microbiol 21, 174 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02247-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Microbial detection
  • Microbial quantification
  • Detection of S. aureus
  • Detection of MRSA
  • Xpert
  • ViPrimePLUS