Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Methodology article
  • Open Access

Development of flow cytometry based adherence assay for Neisseria gonorrhoeae using 5′-carboxyfluorosceinsuccidyl ester

Contributed equally
BMC Microbiology201919:67

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1438-2

  • Received: 19 March 2018
  • Accepted: 19 March 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Neisseria gonorrhoeae is an obligate human pathogen and its adherence to host cells is essential for its pathogenesis. Gonococcal adherence assays are based on the enumeration of bacteria attached to human cells on solid media. Because conventional adherence assays are based on bacterial counts, they are often time consuming to perform and prone to observer bias. A flow cytometry based method, using the cell-permeable fluorescent dye 5′-carboxyfluoroscein succidyl ester (CFSE), was developed to dramatically increase the number of adherent N. gonorrhoeae quantified per assay while improving repeatability and removing observer bias. Piliated N. gonorrhoeae F62 were stained with CFSE then the staining reaction was quenched with foetal bovine serum. Human cervical ME-180 cells were infected with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae (multiplicity of the infection 100:1) for 2 h. Infected cells were washed to remove loosely adhered bacteria. Flow cytometry was used to quantify the percentage of ME-180 cells associated with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae and a minimum of 30,000 events were recorded. Real time-PCR analysis targeting opa gene (encoding N. gonorrhoeae opacity associated gonococcal outer membrane protein) was performed on infected ME-180 cells to confirm the flow cytometric adherence assay results. A rabbit was immunized with heat-killed N. gonorrhoeaeF62 to generate hyperimmune serum. The functional compatibility of the assay was confirmed by studying the effect of N. gonorrhoeae F62 antiserum on blocking adherence/invasion of CFSE-stained bacteria to ME-180 cells.

Results

We observed that 20.3% (+/− 1.0) ME-180 cells were associated with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae. Heat-inactivated hyperimmune serum, at 1:10 to 1:80 dilutions, significantly inhibited gonococcal adherence by 6 and 3 fold, respectively. Real time-PCR analysis targeting opa gene confirmed that hyperimmune serum blocked adherence/invasion of N. gonorrhoeae to the ME-180 cells in a dilution-dependent manner.

Conclusions

Flow cytometric analysis was amenable to quick, easy and high-throughput quantification of the association of N. gonorrhoeae with ME-180 cells and was functionally confirmed using PCR analysis. These approaches may be adapted for in vitro and in vivo adherence studies related to gonococcal pathogenesis.

Keywords

  • Flow cytometry
  • Neisseria gonorrhoeae
  • Neutralizing antibodies
  • 5′-carboxyfluoroscein succidyl ester

Background

Flow cytometry-based adherence assays have been used to quantify interactions between bacteria and eukaryotic cells and these assays have numerous benefits over conventional assays [1, 2]. In conventional adherence assays, bacteria are allowed to attach to solid-phase immobilized cells, they are washed and enumerated either by viable counts or by counting the bacteria visible under a microscope. These methods tend to be time consuming, are not always highly repeatable, and are prone to observer bias [1]. Flow cytometric adherence assays allow for the fast and highly reproducible quantification of significantly higher numbers of bacteria/eukaryotic cell interactions.

Neisseria gonorrhoeae is an obligate human pathogen that causes gonorrhea. N. gonorrhoeae primarily infects mucosal membranes which are lined with non-cornified columnar or cuboidal epithelial cells and are found in the urogenital tract, the rectal mucosa, the conjunctiva and pharynx [3]. In men, infection with N. gonorrhoeae primarily manifests as urethritis and can occasionally lead to infertility and acute or chronic prostatitis. In women, cervicitis is the most common clinical manifestation of N. gonorrhoeae infection, but untreated infection may lead to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)and further serious complications of reproductive health such as ectopic pregnancy [3, 4]. Disseminated infections can cause skin and/or joint/tendon infection and, rarely, endocarditis or meningitis [5]. Newborns may become infected during delivery and acquire eye infections (ophthalmia neonatorum) or disseminated disease [5]. Gonococcal infection is a major public health threat because it facilitates the transmission and acquisition of Human Immunodeficiency Virus [6] and because gonorrhea may become untreatable as N. gonorrhoeae has developed resistance against all classes of antimicrobials [7].

Carboxyfluoroscein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFDA-SE) is a fluorescent membrane permeable ester that will, upon activation by intracellular esterase, covalently link to intracellular proteins through its succinimidyl group [8]. CFSE stains bacteria efficiently without affecting cell adhesion ability, viability or metabolism and it is retained for long periods of time which makes it amenable to tracking association or invasion of eukaryotic cells even as they replicate [9]. Flow cytometric assays using CFSE bacterial staining had been to used measure in vivo and in vitro bacterium and host/eukaryotic cell interactions [1, 9, 10]. Recently, our laboratory demonstrated that this method is an effective high throughput tool to measure bacterial infection of eukaryotic cells [10]. Here in we developed a carboxyfluoroscein (CFSE) staining-based flow cytometric assay to quantify gonococcal adherence to human cervical ME-180 cells, a cell line used extensively to study N. gonorrhoeae and host cell interactions [10]. Flow cytometry adherence results were confirmed by RT-PCR analysis. Anti-N. gonorrhoeae hyperimmune serum antibodies inhibited gonococcal adherence to ME-180 cells and were used to determine the functional compatibility of the assay.

Results

CFSE staining of N. gonorrhoeae and bacterial viability

CFSE staining did not affect viability of N. gonorrhoeae and inoculation of GCMBK agar plates with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae F62 yielded plentiful pure growth, confirmed by Gram staining (Gram negative diplococcic) and positive oxidase test (data not shown).Forward (FSC-H) and side scatter (SSC-H) dot plot of unstained (Fig. 1a, representative dot plot) and CFSE-stained (Fig. 1b) N. gonorrhoeae F62 subjected to flow cytometric analysis is shown in Fig. 1. Viable bacteria are shown in Gate A which confirms that N. gonorrhoeae are sufficiently large and complex for them to be detected and quantified using the flow cytometer and that CFSE staining did not impact bacteria size or complexity (Fig. 1b).In Fig. 1c, we show flow cytometric analysis of unstained N. gonorrhoeae F62 and Gate B is drawn above the background fluorescence recorded in FL1. Negligible fluorescent events are detected in the unstained bacteria (0.2%; Fig. 1c).When Gate B was applied to the CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae, 99.9% of the bacteria were fluorescent (Fig. 1d). These results indicate that several thousand N. gonorrhoeae (> 30,000) could be quantified using flow cytometric analysis, that CFSE staining does not affect N. gonorrhoeae viability, and that CFSE effectively stained the majority of N. gonorrhoeae.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Flow cytometric analysis of CFSE stained N. gonorrhoeae. Flow cytometry analysis of non-stained N. gonorrhoeae cells forward/side scatter plot (a), CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae forward/side scatter plot (b), non-stained N. gonorrhoeae forward scatter/FL1 channel plot (c) and CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae forward scatter/FL1 channel plot (d). These experiments were performed n = 3 times

Quantification of adherence of CFSE-labelled N. gonorrhoeae to ME-180 cells

Figure 2 represents the gating strategies to determine adherence or invasion of CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae to ME-180 cells. Figure 2a shows the flow cytometric gating strategy for live ME-180 cells (Gate A) whereas Gate B in Fig. 2b-f shows percentage of fluorescent events recorded in FL1-H. As expected, we recorded negligible fluorescence from uninfected ME-180 (0.07%; Fig. 2b) and from ME-180 cells infected with unstained N. gonorrhoeae (0.08%; Fig. 2c). As a positive control, ME-180 cells infected with MOI 0.01 CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae were not washed and 55% fluorescent events were recorded indicating that ME-180 cells were infected with or adhered to by CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae or that CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae remained in the culture supernatant. Figure 2e shows a representative plot of ME-180 cells infected with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae (MOI 0.01) washed 3 times and 22.38% fluorescent events were recorded (Fig. 2e).These assays were repeated 4 times and an average of 19.2 ± 1.0% fluorescent events were recorded indicating consistent adherence to or infection of ME-180 cells with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae (data not shown). To reconfirm purity of the culture, an inoculation of the ME-180 cells infected with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae was grown on GCMBK agar after washing and yielded a pure gonococcal growth (data not shown) [11].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Flow cytometric gating strategy on ME-180 cells. Gating strategy on live ME-180 cells forward/side scatter plot (a), ME-180 cells forward scatter/FL1 channel plot (b), ME-180 cells infected with non-CFSE stained N. gonorrhoeae (MOI 1:100) (c), ME-180 cells infected with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae (MOI 1:100) without washings with PBS (d), ME-180 cells infected with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae (MOI 1:100) with washings (n = 3) with PBS to remove loosely adhered bacteria (e), and ME-180 cells incubated in CFSE-bacterial supernatant forward scatter/FL1 channel plot (f)

Finally, we wished to confirm that any CFSE staining was positively associated with the presence of CFSE-stained bacteria and not from CFSE leaking out from the bacteria and staining the eukaryotic cells. We suspended CFSE-labeled bacteria in cell media for 1 h at 37 °C followed by centrifugation to remove the bacteria and the media was collected. ME-180 cells were then cultured in the media (post-bacterial removal). Flow cytometric analysis of the ME-180 cells showed negligible fluorescence (0.79% fluorescent events in FL-1 channel, Fig. 2f) indicating that the CFSE did not leak out from the bacteria to stain the eukaryotic cells. We can be confident that fluorescent signals detected by flow cytometry indicate the presence of CFSE-bacteria that adhered to or invaded the ME-180 cells.

Neutralization assay to assess whether serum antibodies blocked N. gonorrhoeae adherence of ME-180 cells

To investigate whether flow cytometric quantification of CFSE-labeled bacteria can be used in conjunction with functional assays, we measured whether antibodies in hyperimmune serum neutralized the adherence of N. gonorrhoeae in ME-180 cells. Flow cytometry was performed on ME-180 cells alone or ME-180 cells infected with CFSE-stained bacteria after washing multiple times with saline (Fig. 3). CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae adhered to or invaded 20.3% (+/− 1.0%) ofME-180cells and pre-incubation of CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae with 1:10 ratio hyperimmune serum significantly reduced the percentage of events in FL-1 channel (p < 0.001), indicating reduced adherence to (or invasion) ME-180 cells. Pre-incubation of CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae with 1:20(p < 0.01) and 1:40 (p < 0.05) hyperimmune serum significantly reduced adherence/invasion of ME-180 cells whereas 1:80 hyperimmune serum did not significantly impact adherence/invasion of to bacteria to the eukaryotic cells. Incubation of CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae with 1:10 (p < 0.05) and 1:20 (p < 0.05) control serum prevented significantly less bacterial adherence/invasion of ME-180 cells relative to the corresponding ratio of hyperimmune serum. These data indicate that the hyperimmune serum neutralized N. gonorrhoeae adherence/invasion of ME-180 cells and that flow cytometric analysis of bacterial neutralization was highly quantifiable.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Flow cytometric analysis of neutralization and adherence inhibition assay using ME-180 cells, and ME-180 cells infected with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae (Ng) with and without incubation with serum antibodies. CFSE-stained Ng was preincubated with heat inactivated negative (1:10 and 1:20 dilutions) and positive hyperimmune serum (1:10 to 1:80 dilutions). Infected ME-180 cells were washed three times with PBS to remove loosely adherent CFSE-stained Ng

Confirmation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae adherence/invasion of ME-180 cells by RT- PCR analysis

We performed RT-PCR analysis on mock-infected ME-180 cells and ME-180 cells infected with MOI 0.01 CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae with and without pre-incubation with serum antibodies (Fig. 4). Results indicated that ME-180 cells do not express the bacterial opa gene and that CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae that infected ME-180 cells did express this gene. We inoculated ME-180 cells infected with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae on GCMBK agar. As expected, we observed staining with CFSE did not negatively impact N. gonorrhoeae growth (data not shown) [11].
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Real Time PCR analysis of neutralization and adherence inhibition assay using ME-180 cells, and ME-180 cells infected with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae (Ng) with and without incubation with serum antibodies. CFSE-stained Ng was preincubated with heat inactivated negative (1:10 and 1:20 dilutions) and positive hyperimmune serum (1:10 to 1:80 dilutions). Infected ME-180 cells were washed three times with PBS to remove loosely adherent CFSE-stained Ng

Pre-incubation of CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae with 1:10 (p > 0.001) and 1:20 (p > 0.01) hyperimmune serum (but not 1:40 and 1:80) significantly reduced the fold-change of opa gene expression relative to infected ME-180 cells not pre-treated with hyperimmune serum. The fold-change in opa gene expression ME-180 cells infected with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae was significantly different (p < 0.01) between the bacteria pre-treated with 1:10 ratio hyperimmune serum relative to the control serum. These data indicate that 1:10 ratio of hyperimmune serum blocked the adherence/invasion of CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae to ME-180 cells. RT-PCR results were in concordance to flow cytometry results and this further establishes that flow cytometry and CFSE staining can be used for N. gonorrhoeae adherence/invasion studies.

Discussion

Detecting N. gonorrhoeae adherence of ME-180 cells using flow cytometry has many advantages over traditional culturing and cell-counting methods. This low cost method allows detection of CFSE-stained bacteria inside ME-180 cells without fixation and permeabilization [12].Flow cytometric assay offers a significant increase in quantification capabilities in that it is routinely used to detect 10–100,000 events rather than a mere few hundred which is routinely quantified using conventional techniques. Flow cytometry based assay can detect weak bacterium-cell interactions as compared to conventional solid phase adhesion assays [1]. Tobiason and Seifert (2001) briefly described a CFSE staining-based flow cytometric to measure N. gonorrhoeae to human epithelial cell lines (Chang, ME180, HEC-1B and PC-3) [13]. However, we did not come across any study using CFSE staining based flow cytometric to determine N. gonorrhoeae adherence to host cells in vitro or in vivo. We made improvements to the method described previously [14] by recording a higher number (30,000) of events compared to this previous study (10,000) and by arresting the CFSE staining of N. gonorrhoeae using equal volume of FBS followed by removal of trace amounts of the stain by three washes with PBS. Tobiason and Seifert (2001) did not terminate the fluorescent labelling of N. gonorrhoeae and instead simply pelleted the bacteria and washed them once in PBS to remove excess CFDA-SE [13, 14]. This reduced washing and lack of a quenching may have contributed to excessive and non-specific florescence in their study [14]. Further, we used a reduced saponin (0.5%) concentration to lift ME-180 cells associated with fluorescent bacteria from the 24 well plate, compared to previously described method [14]. In our opinion, this contributed to the better collection of ME-180 cells for FACS analysis as it decreased the buoyancy and helped in improved pelleting of the cells during centrifugation. This improvement was reflected by a 3-fold increase in the number of recorded florescent events to 30,000 [14]. We also clarified that ME-180 cells did not acquire CFSE-staining due to the leakage of CFSE from stained bacteria. Our results confirm that CFSE-staining of N. gonorrhoeae did not trigger any change in colony growth characteristics. The development of an objective and reliable method of quantitating the proportion of epithelial cells with adherent bacteria may be of value in the detailed assessment of the kinetics of distinct myeloid and lymphoid cells responsible for combating N. gonorrhoeae infection. For instance, specific cell types infected by N. gonorrhoeae and/or recruited to the vagina, fallopian tubes, cervix and draining lymph nodes, could be quantified in early infections (and possibly in late infections if the number of cell divisions has not reduced the amount of CSFE below the level of detection in each daughter cell.) Cell-sorting could then be used to characterize changes in cell function following N. gonorrhoeae infection.

Conclusions

CFSE-staining of N. gonorrhoeae is compatible with measuring adherence to ME-180 cells. Flow cytometric analysis and RT-PCR analyses indicated that CFSE- stained N. gonorrhoeae adhered to or invaded ME-180 cells and that heat-inactivated rabbit hyperimmune serum inhibited the bacterial adherence/invasion of eukaryotic cells. Together, these findings strongly suggest that CFSE staining can be used in gonococcal adherence/invasion assays.

Methods

N. gonorrhoeae growth conditions

Frozen stocks (− 80 °C) of N. gonorrhoeae F62 isolates were retrieved on Difco™ GC agar medium base (GCMB, BD Biosciences, ON, Canada) supplemented with 1% modified Kellogg’s supplement (GCMBK), at 35 °C in a humid environment with 5–7% CO2 [11]. Our F62 strain is part of Dr. Dillon’s personal collection which was originally provided by Dr. Doug Kellogg; information on N. gonorrhoeae F62 is provided in [15]. For epithelial cell infections, T1 and T2 colonies were incubated for 12 h and piliated N. gonorrhoeae (presence of pili was confirmed with a dissecting microscope) were subcultured on GCMBK [16]. After 10–12 h of incubation growth, piliated N. gonorrhoeae were harvested and resuspended in PBS. Cell density was adjusted to an OD600 = 0.30 to 0.35 (~ 1 × 108 cfu/ml) for adherence studies [17].

Cell culture and bacterial propagation conditions

Human cervical ME-180 (ATCC HTB-33) cells were maintained at 37 °C, in a humidified incubator with 5% (v/v) CO2 in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI) medium 1640 (Gibco #11875–093) containing 5% heat inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich, ON, Canada), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco # 11360–070) and 1x Anti-Anti (Gibco #15240–062) [10]. Cells were passaged twice weekly in 1:5 ratio in 75 cm2 cell culture flasks (Corning Incorporated, Corning, USA).

CFSE labelling of N. gonorrhoeae and flow cytometric analysis

Piliated N. gonorrhoeae F62 were stained with CellTrace™ CFSE Cell Proliferation Kit (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies) as described previously [12].To ensure that CFSE staining did not affect viability of N. gonorrhoeae, we inoculated GCMBK agar plates with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeaeF62 and plentiful growth was observed. The purity of the CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae F62 was confirmed by Gram-staining and oxidase testing (data not shown) [11].

Bacterial adherence assay

Adherence of N. gonorrhoeae to ME-180 cells was determined by seeding 2 × 105 ME-180 cells/well in a 24 well tissue culture plate (Costar #3524, Corning Incorporated, Corning, USA) for 18–20 h at 80–90% confluency in antibiotic-free RPMI medium. ME-180 cells were infected with 200 μl (2 × 107 cfu/ml) of CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae F62 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1:100 and incubated for 2 h in a humidified chamber, with 5% (v/v) CO2 at 37 °C [18]. ME-180 cells alone and ME-180 cells infected with non-stained bacteria were used as negative controls. After incubation, infected wells were washed three times with PBS to remove loosely adhered bacteria. As a positive control, select wells containing ME-180 cells infected with CFSE stained bacteria were not washed with PBS. Saponin (500 μl of 0.5% solution in PBS, Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON) was added to each well (37 °C for 15 min) to lift the cells. Wells were washed three times with 500 μl of FACS buffer, the cells were centrifuged at 1000 x g for 10 min then resuspended in 0.4 ml FACS buffer for flow cytometric analysis. All experiments were carried out in duplicate and at least 30,000 events (number of ME-180 cells associated with CFSE stained fluorescent N. gonorrhoeae) per well were recorded with a flow cytometer.

Flow cytometric analysis

Flow cytometric analysis was performed using a BD FACS Calibur™ flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) as detailed in [12] with the exception that uninfected and unstained ME-180 cells were used to establish background fluorescence.

Animals and generation/validation of hyper immune serum

All animal experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Procedures for Ethics Review of Animal Use Protocols, and approved by the University Committee on Animal Care and Supply, University of Saskatchewan.

A female New Zealand White rabbit (2–3 kg weight; Charles River Laboratories, Inc.) was used to generate hyperimmune serum specific for N. gonorrhoeae F62 as detailed in [12] with the exception that the rabbit was injected with heat-killed (56 °C for 30 min) N. gonorrhoeae F62 (1 × 108 cfu/ml suspended in sterile GC broth) and Incomplete Freund’s Adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON) in a 1:1 dilution on day 0, 14, and 28 [17]. Rabbit hyperimmune sera were collected via exsanguination following administration of Euthanyl (Bimeda-MTC Animal Health Inc., Cambridge, ON, Canada) to euthanize the rabbits 42 days after the first vaccination. All blood samples collected in Vacutainers (BD Biosciences-Canada, Mississauga, ON) were centrifuged (2500 rpm for 20 min) and serum was stored at − 20 °C till further use.

The specificity of the hyperimmune serum was determined by Western blot analysis. Briefly, Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) analysis (Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit, #23225, Thermo Scientific) was performed to quantify protein concentration. Ten μg protein from bacterial cells and ME-180 cells infected for 2 h with N. gonorrhoeae F62 was loaded per well and electrophoresed on 10% SDS-PAGE gels. SDS gels were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane which was hybridized with rabbit anti-N. gonorrhoeae hyper immune serum [1:500 in 3% skimmed milk powder (SMP)] at 4 °C overnight. After washing with PBS three times for 10 min intervals, membranes were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IRDye 800CW (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, USA, 1:10,000 in 3% SMP) for 2 h at room temperature. After washing with PBS three times for 10 min intervals, with TBS plus Tween 20. Nitrocellulose membranes were scanned using an Odyssey CLx Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, USA).

The lanes of isolated proteins are as follows: Lane 1- marker proteins, Lane 2- GC broth, Lane 3- ME-180 cells, Lane 4- N. gonorrhoeae cells, Lane 5- ME-180 cells infected with N. gonorrhoeae (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Antibodies in the hyper immune serum bound to many proteins in lanes 4 and 5 but not in any other lanes indicating specificity for N. gonorrhoeae and not ME-180 cells or broth components. The negative control serum failed to bind proteins in any lanes. These data confirmed that the rabbit hyperimmune serum antibodies were specific for N. gonorrhoeae.

Neutralization assay

Ten-fold dilutions of complement-inactivated (56 °C for 30 min) rabbit anti-N. gonorrhoeae F62 hyper immune serum and negative rabbit serum (obtained on Day 0 prior to immunization) were prepared in PBS. CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae F62 (1 × 108 cfu/ml), suspended in PBS, was mixed with 1:1 with 400 μl of each serum dilution followed by incubation at room temperature for 1 h. After incubation, the bacterial suspensions were centrifuged at 2500 x g for 10 min; then, the supernatant was discarded and pellets were resuspended in 200 μl antibiotic-free RPMI at a final concentration of 2 × 107 cfu/ml. Duplicate ME-180 cells (2 × 105 cells/well) were infected serum treated N. gonorrhoeae F62 i.e.2 x 107cfu/well. ME-180 cells were either mock-infected (no bacteria; negative control), or infected with CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae (positive control), CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae treated with hyper immune serum, CFSE-stained N. gonorrhoeae treated with negative control serum. After 2 h, infected ME-180 cells and mock-infected ME-180 cells were collected and prepared for flow cytometric analysis (as indicated above) or Real-time PCR analysis (as detailed below).

Real time PCR analysis

ME-180 cells +/− CFSE-N. gonorrhoeae were subjected to RT-PCR analysis which was performed 5 times with technical duplicates. ME-180 cells+/− CFSE-N. gonorrhoeae were collected in 500 μl of 0.5% saponin/well and washed 3 times with PBS, then and pelleted by centrifugation at 1000 x g for 10 min. The cell pellet was ruptured using 250 μl NaOH buffer (25 mM NaOH, 0.2 mM EDTA) and boiling as detailed previously [12]. Real time PCR analysis was performed with primers opa_F (5′-GTTCATCCGCCATATTGTGTTGA-3′) opa_R (5′-AAGGGCGGATTATATCGGGTTCC-3′) targeting opa gene using Step One Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems by Life Technologies) after modifying the method described by Donà et al. (2016) [19]. Opa gene encodes opacity associated outer membrane proteins which is considered a diagnostic for N. gonorrhoeae. Briefly, each 15 μl reaction mixture contained 0.3 M each primer, 2x master mix (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA), and 2 μl of genomic DNA. The PCR analysis included an initial denaturation step (95 °C for 10 min), followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (95 °C for 15 s), annealing (65 °C for 10 s), and extension (72 °C for 10 s), and produced a specific melt curve for N. gonorrhoeae (data not shown).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis and graphing was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). One way ANOVA with Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare flow cytometry and qPCR data andmedian values were compared usingDunn’s test. Differences were considered significant if p < 0.05.

Notes

Abbreviations

CFDA-SE: 

Carboxyfluoroscein diacetate succinimidyl ester

CFSE: 

5′-carboxyfluoroscein succidyl ester

FSC-H: 

Forward scatter

h: 

Hour

N. gonorrhoeae

Neisseria gonorrhoeae

PID: 

Pelvic inflammatory disease

RT-PCR: 

Real time-PCR

SSC-H: 

Side scatter

Declarations

Acknowledgments

HLW is an adjunct professor in the Department of Veterinary Microbiology in the Western College of Veterinary Medicine as well as in the School of Public Health at the University of Saskatchewan. The manuscript is published with permission of the Director of VIDO-InterVac (Manuscript #834).

Funding

Financial support for this research was provided by the NSERC to HLW and SHRF Establishment Grant funding to JRD. SD was supported through a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation (SHRF). MO was supported though a University of Saskatchewan, School of Public Health Scholarship and a scholarship from the Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) funded Interdisciplinary Training Program in Infectious Diseases, Food Safety and Public Policy (ITraP) program. The funding agencies did not play a role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation or writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

SD, JRD and HLW designed the study SD and HLW wrote the manuscript which was critically reviewed first by JRD and then the rest of the authors. MO, SD and SN performed the neutralization and flow cytometry assays, PCR analysis and cell culture analysis. SD and SN carried out the ELISA. SD, JRD, MRO, SN and HLW all gave final approval of the version to be published and take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Procedures for Ethics Review of Animal Use Protocols and approved by the University Committee on Animal Care and Supply, University of Saskatchewan.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization - International Vaccine Centre (VIDO-InterVac), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5E3, Canada
(2)
School of Public Health, Vaccinology and Immunotherapeutics Program, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
(3)
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

References

  1. Hytonen J, Haataja S, Finne J. Use of flow cytometry for the adhesion analysis of Streptococcus pyogenes mutant strains to epithelial cells: investigation of the possible role of surface pullulanase and cysteine protease, and the transcriptional regulator Rgg. BMC Microbiol. 2006;6:18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sethman CR, Doyle RJ, Cowan MM. Flow cytometric evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus pyogenes to epithelial cells. J Microbiol Methods. 2002;51(1):35–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hook EW, Handsfield HH. Gonococcal infections in the adult. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Stamm WM, Piot P, Wasserheit JN, Corey L, Cohen MS, Wttas DH, editors. Sex Transm Dis. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008. p. 627–45.Google Scholar
  4. Rice PA, Shafer WM, Ram S, Jerse AE. Neisseria gonorrhoeae: drug resistance, mouse models, and vaccine development. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2017;71:665–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Rice PA. Gonococcal arthritis (disseminated gonococcal infection). Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2005;19(4):853–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ward H, Ronn M. Contribution of sexually transmitted infections to the sexual transmission of HIV. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010;5(4):305–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Dillon JR, Parti R, Thakur SD. Antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates: will infections be untreatable in the future? Culture Microbiol Rev. 2015;35:1–8.Google Scholar
  8. Weston SA, Parish CR. New fluorescent dyes for lymphocyte migration studies. Analysis by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. J Immunol Methods. 1990;133(1):87–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuller ME, Streger SH, Rothmel RK, Mailloux BJ, Hall JA, Onstott TC, Fredrickson JK, Balkwill DL, DeFlaun MF. Development of a vital fluorescent staining method for monitoring bacterial transport in subsurface environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(10):4486–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Minor SY, Banerjee A, Gotschlich EC. Effect of alpha-oligosaccharide phenotype of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain MS11 on invasion of Chang conjunctival, HEC-1-B endometrial, and ME-180 cervical cells. Infect Immun. 2000;68(12):6526–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Knapp JS. Historical perspectives and identification of Neisseria and related species. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988;1(4):415–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Obradovic M, Pasternak JA, Ng SH, Wilson HL. Use of flow cytometry and PCR analysis to detect 5-carboxyfluoroscein-stained obligate intracellular bacteria Lawsonia intracellularis invasion of McCoy cells. J Microbiol Methods. 2016;126:60–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Logan RP, Robins A, Turner GA, Cockayne A, Borriello SP, Hawkey CJ. A novel flow cytometric assay for quantitating adherence of helicobacter pylori to gastric epithelial cells. J Immunol Methods. 1998;213(1):19–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tobiason DM, Seifert HS. Inverse relationship between pilus-mediated gonococcal adherence and surface expression of the pilus receptor, CD46. Microbiology. 2001;147(Pt 8):2333–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Evins GM, Knapp JS. Characterization of Neisseria gonorrhoeae reference strains used in development of serologic classification systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26(2):358–63.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Swanson J, Kraus SJ, Gotschlich EC. Studies on gonococcus infection. I. Pili and zones of adhesion: their relation to gonococcal growth patterns. J Exp Med. 1971;134(4):886–906.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Criss AK, Seifert HS. Neisseria gonorrhoeae suppresses the oxidative burst of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(11):2257–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu GL, Parti RP, Dillon J-AR. Suppression of ERK activation in urethral epithelial cells infected with Neisseria gonorrhoeae and its isogenic minD mutant contributes to anti-apoptosis. Microbes Infect. 2015;17(4):317–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Dona V, Kasraian S, Lupo A, Guilarte YN, Hauser C, Furrer H, Unemo M, Low N, Endimiani A. Multiplex real-time PCR assay with high-resolution melting analysis for characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(8):2074–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement