Open Access

Acanthamoeba containing endosymbiotic chlamydia isolated from hospital environments and its potential role in inflammatory exacerbation

  • Tatsuya Fukumoto1,
  • Junji Matsuo2,
  • Torahiko Okubo2,
  • Shinji Nakamura3,
  • Kentaro Miyamoto4,
  • Kentaro Oka4,
  • Motomichi Takahashi4,
  • Kouji Akizawa1,
  • Hitoshi Shibuya1,
  • Chikara Shimizu1 and
  • Hiroyuki Yamaguchi2Email author
Contributed equally
BMC MicrobiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:292

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0906-1

Received: 22 May 2016

Accepted: 29 November 2016

Published: 15 December 2016

Abstract

Background

Environmental chlamydiae belonging to the Parachlamydiaceae are obligate intracellular bacteria that infect Acanthamoeba, a free-living amoeba, and are a risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia. However, whether amoebae harboring environmental chlamydiae actually survive in hospital environments is unknown. We therefore isolated living amoebae with symbiotic chlamydiae from hospital environments.

Results

One hundred smear samples were collected from Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan; 50 in winter (February to March, 2012) and 50 in summer (August, 2012), and used for the study. Acanthamoebae were isolated from the smear samples, and endosymbiotic chlamydial traits were assessed by infectivity, cytokine induction, and draft genomic analysis. From these, 23 amoebae were enriched on agar plates spread with heat-killed Escherichia coli. Amoeba prevalence was greater in the summer-collected samples (15/30, 50%) than those of the winter season (8/30, 26.7%), possibly indicating a seasonal variation (p = 0.096). Morphological assessment of cysts revealed 21 amoebae (21/23, 91%) to be Acanthamoeba, and cultures in PYG medium were established for 11 of these amoebae. Three amoebae contained environmental chlamydiae; however, only one amoeba (Acanthamoeba T4) with an environmental chlamydia (Protochlamydia W-9) was shown the infectious ability to Acanthamoeba C3 (reference amoebae). While Protochlamydia W-9 could infect C3 amoeba, it failed to replicate in immortal human epithelial, although exposure of HEp-2 cells to living bacteria induced the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-8. Comparative genome analysis with KEGG revealed similar genomic features compared with other Protochlamydia genomes (UWE25 and R18), except for a lack of genes encoding the type IV secretion system. Interestingly, resistance genes associated with several antibiotics and toxic compounds were identified.

Conclusion

These findings are the first demonstration of the distribution in a hospital of a living Acanthamoeba carrying an endosymbiotic chlamydial pathogen.

Keywords

Acanthamoeba Environmental chlamydiae Hospital IL-8 Genome sequence

Background

Obligate intracellular environmental chlamydiae belong to the Parachlamydiaceae (Parachlamydia, Protochlamydia, and Neochlamydia) [1], diverged from pathogenic chlamydiae (e.g. Chlamydia trachomatis or C. pneumoniae) 0.7–1.4 billion years ago [2]. Similar to pathogenic chlamydiae, the environmental chlamydiae have a unique developmental cycle, consisting of two distinct forms: the elementary body, an infectious form, and the reticulate body, a replicative form [3]. Through this cycle, environmental chlamydiae can grow and survive within Acanthamoeba, a free-living amoeba that inhabits a wide range of natural environments, such as rivers and soil [4]. Because people can unconsciously carry soil, for example on shoes, amoebae may be widely distributed in public spaces, such as hospitals.

Interestingly, recent studies have revealed the presence of environmental chlamydial DNA in mononuclear cells of sputa or bronchoalveolar lavage samples from patients with bronchitis [57]. It is possible that environmental chlamydiae (Parachlamydia or Protochlamydia) can cause inhalation pneumonia, for example hospital-acquired pneumonia in immune compromised hosts, such as HIV-infected patients or organ transplant recipients [8]. Thus, environmental chlamydiae are a potential etiological agent of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Our recent study found that both DNAs of Parachlamydia and amoebae were coincidentally detected in a hospital environment, with the presence of Acanthamoeba having a significant effect on the long-term survival of the bacteria [9].

Thus, it is possible that this human pathogen can spread through a hospital environment via Acanthamoeba. It is important to determine whether this is the case for the control of hospital-acquired infection. However, whether amoebae harboring environmental chlamydiae can actually survive in harsh conditions, such as on floors or in sinks of hospitals, remains unknown. In the present study, we therefore isolated living amoebae containing symbiotic chlamydiae with bacterial pathogenic features from hospital environments.

Methods

Cells

Acanthamoeba castellanii C3 (ATCC 50739) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Amoebae were maintained in PYG broth (0.75% peptone, 0.75% yeast extract, and 1.5% glucose) at 30 °C [10]. Parachlamydia Bn9 (ATCC VR-1476) was also purchased from the ATCC, and the bacteria were propagated in an amoeba culture system according to methods described previously [10]. The numbers of bacterial infectious progeny were determined by the amoebal infectious unit (AIU) assay described previously [10]. The immortal human epithelial cell line, HEp-2, was also used for the study. HEp-2 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Sigma) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum and antibiotics (penicillin, 100u/ml; streptomycin, 100 μg/ml) (Sigma) at 37 °C in 5% CO2.

Smear sample collection

One hundred-smear samples were collected from a hospital (Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan, which has approximately 900 beds); 50 samples were collected in a winter trial, February to March 2012, and 50 samples were collected in a summer trial, August 2012. The smear samples were collected from the floor or sink outlet by wiping with sterilized gauze moistened with Page’s amoeba saline (PAS) [11], according to a previously described procedure [9]. The pellets obtained from the gauze were resuspended in PAS and used for amoebal isolation and DNA extraction. All sampling locations were limited at drainages, sinks and floors in the public space of hospital, which can be freely accessed by both patients and medical staffs, but not including emerging rooms with recovery rooms or patient rooms.

Isolation of amoebae

Amoebae were isolated using a previously reported method [12]. In brief, a drop of sample/PAS solution was placed on the center of a non-nutrient agar plate on which heat-inactivated E. coli (a stock collection in our laboratory) were spread as a food source. Plates were then incubated at 30 °C. After 7 days of incubation, crawling amoebae with arm-like structures characteristic of Acanthamoeba cysts were isolated, according to a morphological assessment procedure [13]. Amoebae picked under microscopic observation from non-nutrient agar plates were then continuously grown in PYG broth to achieve axenic cultures. Three amoebal strains harboring environmental chlamydiae were finally established (Amoebal strain name/amoebal genotype/bacterial genus; W-9/T4/Protochlamydia sp., Y-20/T4/Neochlamydia sp., Y-23/T4/Neochlamydia sp.); however, because of lacking secondary infectious ability to C3 amoebae, Y-20 and Y-23 amoebae were omitted from the following experiments into assessing intracellular growth and IL-8 induction.

Direct sequencing and phylogenic analysis

To identify Acanthamoeba and environmental chlamydiae in the isolates, total DNA was extracted from amoebae using a High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was then amplified using High-Fidelity Phusion DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) with specific primer sets for the Acanthamoeba 18S rRNA gene (JDP1, 5′-GGCCCAGATCGTTTACCGTGAA-3′; JDP2, 5′-TCTCACAAGCTGCTAGGGAG TCA-3′) [9] and the environmental chlamydia 16S rRNA gene (Ch5, 5′-CGTGGATGAGGCATGCRAGTCG-3′; Ch6, 5′-GTCATCRGCCYYACCTTVSR CRYYTCT-3′) [9]. The amplified products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and extracted from the gel using the FastGene Gel/PCR Extraction Kit (NIPPON Genetics, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and then sequenced by Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea). A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method in MEGA software (version 4) [14]. Accession numbers of nucleotide sequences used for the phylogenetic analysis were listed into a table (See Additional file 1).

Infection and bacterial detection

Bacteria (Prochlamydia W-9 or Parachlamydia Bn9) were added to each well of a 24-well plate seeded with C3 amoebae in PYG broth at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 and then incubated for 1 h. After washing, the cultures were further incubated for up to 5 days at 30 °C in a normal atmosphere. During this period, the amoebal cells were regularly collected to assess bacterial numbers using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), the AIU assay and DAPI staining, according to methods described previously [10, 15]. Meanwhile, the immortal human cell line, HEp-2, was also infected with the bacteria at a MOI of 1–5. The infected HEp-2 cells were incubated in DMEM containing 10% FCS with antibiotics for up to 5 days at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells and supernatant were regularly collected for the determination of bacterial numbers and IL-8 secretion, respectively.

IL-8 quantification

The amount of IL-8, which is an inflammatory cytokine, in HEp-2 cell culture supernatant was quantified using a commercial kit, Human IL-8 ELISA MAX™ Deluxe (BioLegend, Tokyo, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The level of IL-8 gene expression was also determined by qRT-PCR using primer sets specific to IL-8 and an internal control (gapdh: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) as described previously [16].

Draft genome analysis and contig sequence accession numbers

Protochlamydia W-9 genomic DNA was prepared as described previously [17]. In brief, bacteria were collected from amoebae after disruption by bead-beating and were treated with DNase (Sigma) for 30 min at room temperature. After washing, the treated bacteria were suspended in 10 mM HEPES buffer containing 145 mM NaCl, and then the suspension was carefully overlayed onto 30% Percoll. The bacteria were collected from the lower layer following centrifugation at 30,000 × g for 30 min. Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted from the bacterial pellets with the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit as described above. The Protochlamydia W-9 draft genome was obtained using an Illumina Miseq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), with sequencing runs for paired-end sequences. The bacterial DNA libraries were prepared using an NEBNext DNA Library Prep master mix set for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). The genome was assembled using de novo sequence assembler software (Platanus 1.2.1) [18]. Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST: http://rast.nmpdr.org/) was used for gene annotation [19]. Also, functional annotation was performed with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) [20]. The draft genome sequence of Protochlamydia W-9 has been deposited in the DDBJ database under accession numbers BCPZ01000001-BCPZ01000402 (402 entries) and Bioproject number: PRJDB4526.

Statistical analysis

Data were compared using Student’s t-test. Also, prevalence between trials was compared using Pearson’s chi-square test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Prevalence of living amoebae captured in hospital environments and establishment of an amoebal strain harboring an environmental chlamydiae

From 100 swabs taken from hospital floors and sinks, 23 amoebae were enriched on agar plates spread with heat-killed E. coli. From these, eleven were successfully cultured in PYG medium (Additional file 2). Prevalence appeared to increase in the Summer trial, but without statistical significance (p = 0.096), potentially indicating a seasonal variation. Meanwhile, there was no difference in prevalence between swabs from either ‘Dry’ or ‘Moist’ conditions or between floors. One amoeba strain (W-9 amoebae) with an environmental chlamydia was finally used for the following studies; because of lacking secondary infectious ability to C3 amoebae, Y-20 and Y-23 amoebae were omitted from the following experiments into assessing intracellular growth and IL-8 induction. Phylogenic analysis revealed that the W-9 amoeba and the endosymbiotic chlamydia were Acanthamoeba genotype T4 (Additional file 3) and Protochlamydia sp. (Fig. 1), respectively. Thus, living amoebae are distributed in hospital environments and occasionally contain environmental chlamydiae.
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree for Protochlamydia W-9 and other chlamydiae 16S rRNA gene sequences. The tree was constructed by using the Neighbor-Joining method in MEGA software (version 4) [14]. Accession numbers (nucleotide sequences) used for phylogenetic analysis are listed in the Material and Methods section

Protochlamydia W-9 intracellular growth and IL-8 induction

We next assessed if the Protochlamydia W-9 could secondarily infect and then grow in C3 amoebae. qRT-PCR assessment revealed an increase in the amount of bacterial DNA (W-9) in cultures depending on culture period, although the growth speed was very slow compared with that of Parachlamydia Bn9 (Pac) (Fig. 2b). DAPI staining showed a few bacterial particles; however, Parachlamydia Bn9-infected amoebae were mostly disrupted at 3 days (Fig. 2a), supporting our hypothesis that Protochlamydia W-9 grows slowly in the host amoebae. In contrast to C3 amoebae, the Protochlamydia W-9 failed to grow in HEp-2 cells with bacterial numbers decreasing rapidly below baseline after 1 day of incubation (Fig. 3). Interestingly, both ELISA and qRT-PCR revealed that stimulation with living bacteria, but not with heat-killed bacteria, significantly induced IL-8 secretion from HEp-2 cells (Fig. 4). Taken together, these results indicate that Protochlamydia W-9 could spread easily in hospital environments through amoebal secondary infection, supporting our previous results [9]. Furthermore, because of the induction of IL-8, the bacteria could exacerbate inflammation, potentially indicating a risk of a hospital-acquired infection.
Fig. 2

Growth of Protochlamydia W-9 (W9) and Parachlamydia Bn9 (Pac) in Acanthamoeba C3. a Representative images of DAPI staining showing Protochlamydia W9-infected C3 amoebae (Day 5 post-infection) and Parachlamydia Bn9-infected C3 amoebae (Day 3 post-infection). Arrows show bacterial clusters in each amoeba. b Changes in the number of chlamydial 16S rRNA copies per well. The data represent the average number of copies ± SD. The bacterial 16S rRNA copy numbers were normalized with the amoebal 18S rRNA copy numbers. *indicates p < 0.05 vs. value at 1 day

Fig. 3

Growth of Protochlamydia W-9 (W9) and Parachlamydia Bn9 (Pac) in the immortal human epithelial cell line, HEp-2. The data show changes in the average number of chlamydial 16S rRNA copies per well, ± SD. The bacterial 16S rRNA copy numbers were normalized with the HEp-2 gapdh copy numbers

Fig. 4

IL-8 induction in Protochlamydia W-9-stimulated HEp-2 cell cultures. a Assessment of IL-8 gene expression in cultures (24 h post-infection). The level of IL-8 gene expression was determined according to qPCR using primer sets specific to IL-8 and an internal control (GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase). The data represent the average copies ± SD. b Amounts of IL-8 in culture supernatants. The amounts of IL-8 were quantified with a commercial kit, Human IL-8 ELISA MAX™ Deluxe. The data represent the average amount ± SD (pg/ml). * indicates p < 0.05

The Protochlamydia W-9 draft genome features several genes associated with resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds

The draft genome of Protochlamydia consisted of 2,484,573 bp (total contig size) in 402 scaffold contigs. The genome contains 2100 protein-coding sequences (CDSs), and 49 RNAs. RAST-annotated features revealed that there were several genes associated with resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds, indicating the ability of the bacteria to adapt to hash environments (Table 1). Comparative genome analysis with KEGG revealed the Protochlamydia W-9 genome possessed representative environmental chlamydial metabolic pathways (present in Protochlamydia UWE25 [2] and Protochlamydia R18 [21]) that are required for amoebal adaptation (Additional file 4); however, it lacked the genes encoding the type IV secretion system (Additional file 5).
Table 1

RAST- annotated genes associating with resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds

RAST Subsystem

Role (KEGG located number)

Features

Copper homeostasis

Copper-translocating P-type ATPase (EC 3.6.3.4)

peg.608, peg.990, peg.1254

Cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance

Heavy metal RND efflux outer membrane protein, CzcC family

peg.605

Cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance protein

peg.1410

Cobalt/zinc/cadmium efflux RND transporter, membrane fusion protein, CzcB family

peg.606

Cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance protein CzcA

peg.607

Cation efflux system protein CusA

peg.607

Resistance to fluoroquinolones

DNA gyrase subunit B (EC 5.99.1.3)

peg.2036

DNA gyrase subunit A (EC 5.99.1.3)

peg.2037

Topoisomerase IV subunit B (EC 5.99.1.-)

peg.888

Topoisomerase IV subunit A (EC 5.99.1.-)

peg.889

Beta-lactamase

Beta-lactamase (EC 3.5.2.6)

peg.1027, peg.1665

Metal-dependent hydrolases of the beta-lactamase superfamily I

peg.123

Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps

RND efflux system, outer membrane lipoprotein, NodT family

peg.1170

RND efflux system, membrane fusion protein CmeA

peg.1631

RND efflux system, outer membrane lipoprotein CmeC

peg.1629

Acriflavin resistance protein

peg.521

Membrane fusion protein of RND family multidrug efflux pump

peg.522

RND efflux system, inner membrane transporter CmeB

peg.1630

Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps

Multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) family efflux pump YdhE/NorM, homolog

peg.1277

Discussion

We have previously reported both Acanthamoeba and environmental Chlamydia (Parachlamydia) DNAs in a hospital environment, and have shown in an in vitro study that the presence of Acanthamoeba has a significant impact on the long-term survival of environmental chlamydiae. These findings raise the possibility that this potential human pathogen could spread through a hospital environment via Acanthamoeba [9]. However, whether amoebae harboring environmental chlamydiae actually inhabit hospital environments remained to be clarified. We therefore attempted to isolate living amoebae with symbiotic chlamydiae from hospital environments.

From 100 samples obtained from floors or sinks, 23 amoebae were enriched on agar plates spread with heat-killed E. coli. Consistent with PCR results, 21 of these amoebae had morphological features identical to those of Acanthamoeba cysts, such as arm-like structures [13] (See Additional file 2). These results indicated that the amoebal enrichment method was very accurate with high sensitively, despite being time consuming. The amoebae were isolated from places such as floors or sinks in the hospital, suggesting that amoebae inhabit hospital environments. However, because prevalence in the summer tended to be higher than that in the winter, it is possible that outpatients carry less amoeba-containing soil into the hospital during winter because of snow. Chlamydial isolates (Y-20, Y-23 and W-9) have come from distinct 3 floors (7, 8 and 10)(See Additional file 1) directly connected by an elevator, which may be a potential factor responsible for reflecting bacterial traffic via human flow into public spaces. It appeared that there were more amoeba isolated on the lower floors compared to the higher ones, although sample numbers were different among floors, supporting the scenario. Further studies with other hospitals should be performed to clarify this possible scenario. Half of the amoebae enriched on agar plates with heat-killed bacteria (a conventional isolation procedure) failed to grow in PYG medium cultures. The procedure for amoebal isolation using PYG axenic culture may preferentially select some amoebae, indicating a limitation of this protocol. Furthermore, only one amoebal strain with an endosymbiont (Protochlamydia W-9) was fully used for assessing intracellular growth and IL-8 induction, because of the other amoebal endosymbionts (Neochlamydia spp.) lacking secondary infectious ability to C3 amoebae. Although the exact reason for the lacking ability remains to be clear, the findings were intriguingly identical to our previous studies [12, 21], indicating a wide range of diversity in environmental chlamydiae. Thus, the results reveal the presence of a complicated and unknown amoebal ecology in hospital environments, as well as natural environments.

As mentioned above, the growth of Protochlamydia W-9 was very slow compared with the other chlamydia (Parachlamydia Bn9), which caused rapid amoebal lysis depending on bacterial maturation (See Fig. 2). Several reports reveal that amoebae inhabit a wide range of environments depending upon food sources, raising the idea that the amount of food on artificial surfaces, such floors or sinks, might be less than that in natural environments, such as soil or pond waters [12, 2224]. It is, therefore, possible that slow bacterial growth can be beneficial for saving food in harsh environments. Meanwhile, the bacteria failed to grow in a representative immortal human epithelial cell line, HEp-2. Surprisingly, the amount of bacteria significantly decreased during the culture period compared to a reference strain, Parachlamydia Bn9 [25]. While these findings indicate a rapid elimination of bacteria from the cells, it raises a possible scenario that the host cells can rapidly sense the bacteria, which stimulates pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Draft genome analysis revealed Protochlamydia W-9 to possess principal metabolic features that are common to environmental chlamydiae, such as Protochlamydia UWE25 or R18. Also, our data interestingly showed the Protochlamydia W-9 genome to contain several genes associated with resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds, although this feature was not unique to Protochlamydia W-9 because it was seen in other bacterial genomes (data not shown). Accumulated evidence indicates that predatory amoebae play a role in transferring bacterial gene fragments from bacterial pray to other bacteria [2628]. Indeed, protozoa (such as ciliates) are potentially a device for the acceleration of bacterial horizontal gene transfer [2931]. Thus, amoebae harboring environmental chlamydiae with such resistance genes or detoxification systems may be a source of these genes for other inhabitants of amoebae, although further study is needed to test this hypothesis. Meanwhile, when compared with the other bacteria (UWE25 and R18), the type IV secretion system, which delivers effector proteins associated with host cell modulation [32], was not seen, indicating a divergent evolution of environmental chlamydiae. Meanwhile, because environmental chlamydiae (Parachlamydia) lacking the type IV secretion system replicated in immortal epithelial cells, albeit not at body temperature [25], Protochlamydia W-9 has the potential to adapt to human cells.

Conclusions

We visualized for the first time living Acanthamoeba in hospital environments, identifying a risk of environmental chlamydiae, Protochlamydia W-9, in evoking inflammation. Although further study with extended sampling is needed to confirm our findings, our results are useful for understanding amoebal ecology in complicated hospital environments, and indicate a potential role of environmental chlamydiae in evoking respiratory inflammation through inhalation.

Abbreviations

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked Immuno-sorbent assay

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff at the Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, for their assistance throughout this study.

Funding

This work was funded by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research (16 K15270).

Availability of data and materials

The data are presented within the manuscript and the Additional files 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. The draft genome sequence of Protochlamydia W-9 has been deposited in the DDBJ database under accession numbers BCPZ01000001-BCPZ01000402 (402 entries) and Bioproject number: PRJDB4526.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the project: HY. Collected and assessed clinical samples: JM, TF, KA, HS, CS. Genomic sequences: KM, OK, MT. Image analysis: SN. Wrote the manuscript: HY. Critical editing: TO, JM, SN. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This manuscript reporting studies doesn’t involve any human participants, human data, human tissue, individual person’s data or animal experiment.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hokkaido University Hospital
(2)
Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Health Sciences
(3)
Division of Biomedical Imaging Research, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine
(4)
Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

References

  1. Horn M. Chlamydiae as symbionts in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008;62:113–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Horn M, Collingro A, Schmitz-Esser S, Beier CL, Purkhold U, Fartmann B, et al. Illuminating the evolutionary history of chlamydiae. Science. 2004;304:728–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sixt BS, Siegl A, Müller C, Watzka M, Wultsch A, Tziotis D, et al. Metabolic features of Protochlamydia amoebophila elementary bodies--a link between activity and infectivity in Chlamydiae. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003553.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Khan NA. Pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba infections. Microb Pathogen. 2003;234:77–85.Google Scholar
  5. Corsaro D, Greub G. Pathogenic Potential of novel Chlamydiae and diagnostic approached to infections due to these obligate intracellular bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:283–97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Corsaro D, Venditti D, Valassina M. New parachlamydial 16S rDNA phylotypes detected in human clinical samples. Res Microbiol. 2002;153:563–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fritsche TR, Horn M, Wagner M, Herwig RP, Schleifer K, Gauton RK. Phylogenetic diversity among geographically dispersed Chlamydiales endosymbionts recovered from clinical and environmental isolates of Acanthamoeba spp. Appl Env Microbiol. 2000;66:2613–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Lamoth F, Greub G. Amoebal pathogens as emerging causal agents of pneumonia. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000;34:260–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fukumoto T, Matsuo J, Hayashi Y, Oguri S, Nakamura S, Mizutani Y, et al. Impact of free-living amoebae on presence of Parachlamydia acanthamoebae in the hospital environment and its survival in vitro without requirement for amoebae. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:3360–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Matsuo J, Hayashi Y, Nakamura S, Sato M, Mizutani Y, Asaka M, Yamaguchi H. Novel Parachlamydia acanthamoebae quantification method based on coculture with amoebae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:6397–404.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Page FC. A New Key to Freshwater and Soil Gymnamoebae. Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association; 1988.Google Scholar
  12. Matsuo J, Kawaguchi K, Nakamura S, Hayashi Y, Yoshida M, Takahashi K, et al. Survival and transfer ability of phylogenetically diverse bacterial endosymbionts in environmental Acanthamoeba isolates. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2010;2:524–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Duarte JL, Furst C, Klisiowicz DR, Klassen G, Costa AO. Morphological, genotypic, and physiological characterization of Acanthamoeba isolates from keratitis patients and the domestic environment in Vitoria, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Exp Parasitol. 2013;135:9–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software for microcomputers. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994;10:189–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sampo A, Matsuo J, Yamane C, Yagita K, Nakamura S, Shouji N, et al. High-temperature adapted primitive Protochlamydia found in Acanthamoeba isolated from a hot spring can grow in immortalized human epithelial HEp-2 cells. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:486–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Matsuo J, Nakamura S, Takeda S, Ishida K, Yamazaki T, Yoshida M, et al. Synergistic costimulatory effect of Chlamydia pneumoniae with carbon nanoparticles on NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated interleukin-1β secretion in macrophages. Infect Immun. 2015;83:2917–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Yamaguchi H, Matsuo J, Yamazaki T, Ishida K, Yagita K. Draft genome sequence of high-temperature-adapted Protochlamydia sp. HS-T3, an amoebal endosymbiotic bacterium found in Acanthamoeba Isolated from a hot spring in Japan. Genome Announc. 2015;3:e01507–14.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kajitani R, Toshimoto K, Noguchi H, Toyoda A, Ogura Y, Okuno M, et al. Efficient de novo assembly of highly heterozygous genomes from whole-genome shotgun short reads. Genome Res. 2014;24:1384–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, Kanehisa M. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:29–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ishida K, Sekizuka T, Hayashida K, Matsuo J, Takeuchi F, Kuroda M, et al. Amoebal endosymbiont Neochlamydia genome sequence illuminates the bacterial role in the defense of the host amoebae against Legionella pneumophila. PLoS One. 2014;29:e95166.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jjemba PK, Johnson W, Bukhari Z, LeChevallier MW. Occurrence and control of Legionella in recycled water systems. Pathogens. 2015;4:470–502.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Kyle DE, Noblet GP. Seasonal distribution of thermotolerant free-living amoebae. I. Willard’s Pond. J Protozool. 1986;33:422–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kawaguchi K, Matsuo J, Osaki T, Kamiya S, Yamaguchi H. Prevalence of Helicobacter and Acanthamoeba in natural environment. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009;48:465–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yamane C, Yamazaki T, Nakamura S, Matsuo J, Ishida K, Yamazaki S, et al. Amoebal endosymbiont Parachlamydia acanthamoebae Bn9 can grow in immortal human epithelial HEp-2 cells at low temperature; an in vitro model system to study chlamydial evolution. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116486.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Salah IB, Ghigo E, Drancourt M. Free-living amoebae, a training field for macrophage resistance of mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15:894–905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Strassmann JE, Queller DC. Evolution of cooperation and control of cheating in a social microbe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108 Suppl 2:10855–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor M, Mediannikov O, Raoult D, Greub G. Endosymbiotic bacteria associated with nematodes, ticks and amoebae. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012;64:21–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsuo J, Oguri S, Nakamura S, Hanawa T, Fukumoto T, Hayashi Y, et al. Ciliates rapidly enhance the frequency of conjugation between Escherichia coli strains through bacterial accumulation in vesicles. Res Microbiol. 2010;161:711–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Aminov RI. Horizontal gene exchange in environmental microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:158.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Balcázar JL. Effect of ciliates in transfer of plasmid-mediated quinolone-resistance genes in bacteria. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:547–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Hachani A, Wood TE, Filloux A. Type VI secretion and anti-host effectors. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;29:81–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016