Open Access

Screening and characterization of amylase and cellulase activities in psychrotolerant yeasts

  • Mario Carrasco1,
  • Pablo Villarreal1,
  • Salvador Barahona1,
  • Jennifer Alcaíno1,
  • Víctor Cifuentes1 and
  • Marcelo Baeza1Email author
BMC MicrobiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:21

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0640-8

Received: 9 June 2015

Accepted: 13 February 2016

Published: 19 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Amylases and cellulases have great potential for application in industries such as food, detergent, laundry, textile, baking and biofuels. A common requirement in these fields is to reduce the temperatures of the processes, leading to a continuous search for microorganisms that secrete cold-active amylases and cellulases. Psychrotolerant yeasts are good candidates because they inhabit cold-environments. In this work, we analyzed the ability of yeasts isolated from the Antarctic region to grow on starch or carboxymethylcellulose, and their potential extracellular amylases and cellulases.

Result

All tested yeasts were able to grow with soluble starch or carboxymethylcellulose as the sole carbon source; however, not all of them produced ethanol by fermentation of these carbon sources. For the majority of the yeast species, the extracellular amylase or cellulase activity was higher when cultured in medium supplemented with glucose rather than with soluble starch or carboxymethylcellulose. Additionally, higher amylase activities were observed when tested at pH 5.4 and 6.2, and at 30–37 °C, except for Rhodotorula glacialis that showed elevated activity at 10–22 °C. In general, cellulase activity was high until pH 6.2 and between 22–37 °C, while the sample from Mrakia blollopis showed high activity at 4–22 °C. Peptide mass fingerprinting analysis of a potential amylase from Tetracladium sp. of about 70 kDa, showed several peptides with positive matches with glucoamylases from other fungi.

Conclusions

Almost all yeast species showed extracellular amylase or cellulase activity, and an inducing effect by the respective substrate was observed in a minor number of yeasts. These enzymatic activities were higher at 30 °C in most yeast, with highest amylase and cellulase activity in Tetracladium sp. and M. gelida, respectively. However, Rh. glacialis and M. blollopis displayed high amylase or cellulase activity, respectively, under 22 °C. In this sense, these yeasts are interesting candidates for industrial processes that require lower temperatures.

Keywords

Amylase Cellulase Cold-active enzymes Psychrotolerant yeasts

Background

Yeasts inhabit almost all environments on the earth including cold environments in which they are permanently exposed to temperatures below 5 °C. These cold-adapted yeasts are classified as psychrophilic if their optimum and maximum temperatures for growth are ≤ 15 °C and ≤ 20 °C, respectively, or as psychrotolerant (psychrotrophic) if their maximum temperature for growth is above 20 °C [1, 2]. An adaptation of yeasts to cold is the production of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes to use the available carbon sources and in this way they contribute to nutrient recycling and organic matter mineralization [3, 4]. The main adaptation of enzymes from psychrophiles is the maximization of their flexibility resulting in a slower decrease of the reaction rate when temperature is decreased in contrast to their mesophile or thermophile counterparts [5]. Psychrophilic enzymes have higher enzymatic activities at lower temperatures than their mesophyll equivalents [6] and a reduced thermal stability to counteract freezing [7]. These features have attracted the attention of many scientists in recent years due their potential for application in industry. The production of cold-active enzymes including amylase, lipase, protease, cellulase, pectinase and esterase has been reported in yeast species and generally the properties of yeast enzymes differ from those produced by other microorganisms [8, 9]. Cold active amylases and cellulases have great potential to be applied in processes that may require low temperatures such as those in the food, biofuels and detergents industries [10, 11]. Amylolytic enzymes are comprised of three main sub-groups: α-amylase, β-amylase and glucoamylase [12, 13]. Although all of these enzymes are able to hydrolyze α-glucosidic bonds in starch, they have structural and catalytic differences [14]. The complete degradation of raw starch is fundamental to the microbial industrial production of biofuels, and is currently accomplished by supplementation of α-amylase and glucoamylase during the fermentative processes [15].

Cellulases are responsible for the hydrolysis of cellulose to sugars in the environment, and cellulose is the largest source of renewable energy on the planet [16]. Cellulases are produced by bacteria and fungi [1719], and these enzymes are useful in food industry, environmental remediation, fuel production and particularly in the laundry industry [16]. The most commonly used cellulases in industry are produced by fungi, which have optimum temperature at 50 °C [20]. Although cellulases from some psychrophilic yeasts have been described, within cold active enzymes, cellulases remain less studied [21].

To achieve a cost-effective process and to avoid the production of undesirable by-products generated at higher temperatures, a current research effort is aimed at searching for microorganisms that secrete amylases or cellulases that are active at lower temperatures. These microorganisms are even more appealing if they use economical culture media containing raw starch or cellulose as the main constituents [2225]. Previously, our group isolated yeasts from soil samples from the sub-Antarctic region belonging to 22 species, and in preliminary assays several of them showed amylase and cellulase activities, respectively [26]. In this work, these yeasts were further characterized with respect to their assimilation and fermentation of soluble starch (SS) and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). The enzymatic activities in extracellular protein samples obtained from yeasts cultivated in different media were evaluated at different pH and temperatures. Protein samples from yeast species with major amylase or cellulase activities were fractioned by ammonium sulfate precipitation and the protein fractions having the activity of interest were analyzed by peptide mass fingerprint, obtaining promising results.

Results and discussion

Growth and fermentation assays

Yeasts that previously showed positive results for amylase and cellulase activities in colony assays were analyzed for their ability to grow in minimal media (YNB) with SS or CMC as the sole carbon source. As shown in Fig. 1, all tested yeasts were able to grow on these media. In media supplemented with SS, the majority of yeast species produced more biomass at 2 % than at lower concentrations, except Cryptococcus gilvescens and Rh. glacialis B19 that reached a higher biomass when cultured with 0.5–1 and 1 % of SS, respectively (Fig. 1a). With the exception of Leuconeurospora sp. (T27Cd2), which reached more biomass when cultured with 0.5 % CMC, all yeasts showed a higher biomass when cultured with 2 % CMC than with lower concentrations. The ability of the yeast to perform alcoholic fermentation using both compounds as carbon sources was evaluated by the Durham method and ethanol quantification in liquid cultures, but negative results were obtained for all yeast species (not shown). In the case of glucose, positive results were obtained for Candida sake, Mrakia blollopis, Mrakia gelida, Mrakia robertii and Wickermanomyces anomalus. Due to an increase in the viscosity of the medium, the maximum concentration of SS or CMC that could be added to culture media was 2 %, so it was not possible to test higher concentrations. It is important to mention that a significant decrease of the medium viscosity was observed concomitantly with yeast growth. Taken together, these results suggest that the analyzed yeast species are able to assimilate SS and/or CMC, but they are not able to ferment these compounds.
Fig. 1

Biomass reached by the analyzed yeast species cultured with different carbon sources. Yeasts were cultured in minimal YNB medium supplemented with SS (a) or CMC (b) until the stationary phase of growth. The concentration (% w/v) of each carbon source is indicated at the top of graphs. The basal growth of yeasts in YNB without the supplementation of the carbon sources was subtracted in each case

Enzyme activities of extracellular protein samples

Total secreted proteins were obtained by ammonium sulfate precipitation from supernatants from yeast cultures using YM medium supplemented with glucose, and enzyme activities in the samples were evaluated by well test assays. In all assays, denaturalized protein controls corresponding to the protein sample incubated at 100 °C for 15 min were included and in all cases, no activity was observed, as shown in well 2 from Fig. 2a. As exemplified in Fig. 2, a high amylase activity was observed in D. fristingensis (T9) samples and a lower activity was observed in samples from Leuconeurospora sp. T11cd2 cultures (Fig. 2a). Le. fragaria and Mrakia sp. culture samples showed higher cellulase activities (Fig. 2b). In addition, enzyme activities of the protein samples were tested at different pH and temperature conditions including pH 4.6, 5.4 and 6.2; and 4, 10, 15, 22, 30 and 37 °C. The protein samples from the majority of the yeasts analyzed had higher amylase activities at pH 5.4 and 6.2, and at 30 and 37 °C (Fig. 3a). The highest amylase activities were observed in protein samples from Dioszegia fristingensis (T9Df1), M. blollopis, Holtermaniella watticus and Tetracladium sp., which were higher at pH 6.2 and 37 °C. No amylase activity was observed in samples from Cryptococcus sp. and Cr. gilvescens. Cellulase activity could not be assayed at pH 4.6 because the medium in the agar-plates did not solidify at this pH. As shown in Fig. 3b, the highest cellulase activity was observed in samples from Leuconeurospora T17Cd1 at pH 6.2 and 22–30 °C. Also, high activities were observed in samples from Mrakia sp. (pH 5.4; 22–30 °C), M. blollopis (pH 5.4; 4–15 °C) and Tetracladium sp. (pH 5.4; 30 °C). No cellulase activity was observed in samples from Cr. gastricus, H. watticus, Leucosporidiella fragaria and Wickermanomyces anomalus in the assayed conditions. In general, the halos observed in the enzyme activity assays had variable degrees of turbidity. However, samples from Tetracladium sp. and M. gelida gave very clear halos in the amylase and cellulase activity assays, respectively, suggesting greater substrate degradation. Although all yeasts were able to grow in medium with SS or CMC as the sole carbon source, the corresponding extracellular enzyme activity was not observed in some of the protein samples as mentioned above. Considering that it has been previously reported that CMC has an inducing effect in the cellulase activity from the fungus Ganoderma applanatum MR-56 [27] and that amylolytic activity was induced by SS in bacterial isolates [28], it is possible that the yeasts tested in this work require the presence of the substrate to induce the expression of the corresponding genes that encode the respective enzyme activity. To evaluate this possibility, the yeasts were cultured in YM medium supplemented with SS or CMC, the extracellular proteins were obtained and the activities measured (Additional file 1). Figure 4 shows the enzyme activities of protein samples from yeast cultivated in medium supplemented with glucose, SS or CMC, at the pH and temperature at which the highest activity was observed in each case. An amylase activity inducing effect by SS was observed only in samples obtained from four yeast species, most notably in Cr. gilvescens and M. robertii (Fig. 4a). In the other species, the amylase activity was higher in samples from yeast cultivated in medium supplemented with glucose; even more for H. watticus, Rh. glacialis T8Rg and Rh. glacialis T11Rg, no amylase activity was detected when the yeasts were grown in media supplemented with SS. For Cryptococcus sp., no amylase activity was observed in the protein samples obtained from cultures in both conditions. In the analyses of cellulase activities, an inductor effect by CMC was observed only in samples from Cr. gastricus, H. watticus and Le. fragaria, whereas in the samples from the other yeasts species, the highest cellulase activities were observed when yeasts were cultivated in medium supplemented with glucose (Fig. 4b). No cellulase activity was observed in samples from W. anomalus grown in either condition. As indicated in each column of Fig. 4, for almost all yeast species, the total protein amounts were higher in samples from cultures supplemented with SS or CMC than with glucose; however, this increase in total protein content was not correlated with an increase of either amylase or cellulase activity in the samples. Although Cryptococcus sp. and W. anomalus were able to grow using SS and CMC as the sole carbon source, and amylase and cellulase activities were previously detected in yeast colony assays, neither activity was detected in extracellular protein samples from yeast cultures in either condition. It is possible that the corresponding enzymes are anchored to the cell wall, as this has been described for amylase-like enzymes in two species of Aspergillus [29, 30]. There is limited data regarding amylase activity in the yeast genera described in this work; amylase activity was described in Cryptococcus sp. [31] and Cr. flavus [32], the latter of which was successfully expressed in S. cerevisiae [33], Mrakia blollopis [34], Rhodotorula svalbardensis sp. nov [35] and Tetracladium setigerum [36]. No reported data were found in literature about amylase activity in the genera Dioszegia, Leuconeurospora and Holtermaniella. Cellulase activity has been described in Cryptococcus laurentii and Cryptococcus nemorosus [37], Tetracladium [36], and in Mrakia species isolated from Arctic puddles [38]. No data were found in the literature regarding cellulase activity for the genera Dioszegia, Leuconeurospora, Leucosporidiella and Wickermamomyces. The yeast studied in this work were originally isolated from soil samples of King George Island [26] in which there is a considerable input of organic materials, including vegetation. Furthermore, the temperatures in this region are warmer than the rest of Antarctica, having seasonal changes and that can reach up to 20 °C in summer [26, 3941]. According to this, the yeasts studied that showed extracellular cellulase and amylase activities, can use the complex carbon sources, suggesting an active role in vegetable residues recycling and mineralization in this cold environment. Furthermore, the amylase and cellulase activities were detected in a wide range of temperature (4 to 30 °C) and the majority showed higher activities at moderate temperatures (22 or 30 °C). However, these temperatures are lower than those described for these enzymes in mesophilic organisms, which generally show optimal activities at temperatures over 40 °C [42, 43]. This last point reflects the adaptations of the yeasts studied here to the conditions of the sub-Antarctic region where they thrive.
Fig. 2

Enzymatic activities determined by well test assays. Extracellular protein samples were deposited into wells generated in the plates to analyze amylase (a) or cellulase (b) activities, which were incubated at 15 °C. Protein samples in wells: 1, D. fristingensis (T9Df1); 2, D. fristingensis (T9Df1) inactivated at 100 °C for 15 min; 3, Leuconeurospora sp.; 4, Cr. gastricus; 5, D. fristingensis (T11Df1); 6, L. fragaria; 7, W. anomalus

Fig. 3

Enzyme activities in extracellular protein samples. Total proteins were obtained from cell-free supernatants of the analyzed yeast species cultured in YM media supplemented with glucose. The amylase (a) and cellulase (b) activity was evaluated by the well test assay at different pH and temperatures, and normalized by the total protein amount (mm/mg total protein). The gradient color scale indicated in the figure represents the lowest (L, black) to the highest (H, red) activity recorded values from culture supernatant of each yeast species

Fig. 4

Comparison of extracellular enzymatic activities. Protein samples were obtained from yeast cultures in YM medium supplemented with glucose (YM-G), SS (YM-SS) or CMC (YM-CMC). The amylase (a) and cellulase (b) activities were evaluated and normalized by total protein amount (μg) used in the assays, which is indicated in each column

Identification of proteins

Taking into account that currently the industrial production of biofuels is accomplished by supplementation of amylases during the fermentative processes, which is mainly carried out by S. cerevisiae [15], it is desirable that the used enzymes have high activity at temperatures near to 30 °C. This was the case of Tetracladium sp. and M. gelida for amylase and cellulase activity, respectively, so they were selected for further analyses. The yeast Tetracladium sp. was cultured in liquid YM media supplemented with glucose or SS, and the extracellular proteins were fractionated by precipitation with ammonium sulfate (20 to 80 %). Amylase activity was determined in each fraction, revealing that the fraction obtained with 60 % of ammonium sulfate had the highest activity, so this condition was used for the subsequent analyses. Protein samples obtained from cultures supplemented with glucose or SS (Fig. 5a) had a main protein band of about 70 kDa, which after serial dilutions was the only band observed in SDS-PAGE concomitantly with amylase activity. Similar analysis was performed for the yeast M. gelida that showed cellulase activity, which was detected in the fractions of 70 and 80 % of ammonium sulfate from cultures supplemented with glucose and CMC. In analyses of samples from cultures with glucose, a main protein band of about 36 kDa was observed in samples with cellulase activity (Fig. 5b). Although we made several attempts to characterize the extracellular proteins from M. gelida grown in the presence of CMC, the quality of these results was always poor. As in previously reported results [44], this may be due to remaining CMC in the culture supernatant that interfered with the precipitation of proteins and SDS-PAGE analysis protocols, despite performing extensive dialysis of samples. The described 70 and 36 kDa protein bands were analyzed by peptide mass fingerprinting, and the results were analyzed using the Mascot search engine. In the case of the probable cellulase protein, no significant matches were found in the database. For the probable amylase protein, several peptides matched completely with fungal glucoamylases whose sizes ranged from 58 to 68 kDa, which is in accordance with the calculated size of the protein band mentioned above. The peptides ALVEGSTFASKVGASCSWCDSQAPQVLCFLQR, GSSFFTIAVQHR, CDSQAPQVLCFLQR, QAPQVLCFLQR and APQVLCFLQR, matched with glucoamylase precursor protein (XP_001213553) of Aspergillus terreus (NIH2624); the peptide DAALTMK with glucoamylase (ENH88038) of Colletotrichum orbiculare MAFF 240422; the peptides DAALTMK and SQAVIQTANNPSGSLLPSGLGLGEAK with glucoamylase (XP_007284956) of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Nara gc5; and peptides DAALTMK and FNGAWGRPQR with glucoamylase (GAK68551) of Pseudozyma antarctica.
Fig. 5

Extracellular proteins analysis by SDS-PAGE. Proteins samples were obtained from yeast cultures of Tetracladium sp. (a and b) and M. gelida (c) in YM medium supplemented with glucose (a and c) or soluble starch (b). Samples were fractioned with ammonium sulfate. The 60 % fraction, which had the highest amylase activity (a and b), and the 70 and 80 % fractions (c) that had the highest cellulase activity are shown. Serial dilutions of the samples were made (indicated at the top of gels) and the degree of the determined amylase or cellulase activity by the well assay is indicated at the bottom of each gel lane as follows: highest (+++) and lowest (+) recorded activity. The arrows indicate the protein band associated to amylase (a and b) or cellulase activity (c). M, protein marker

Conclusions

All yeast species analyzed in this work showed the ability to assimilate SS or CMC, but none of them was able to carry out ethanol fermentation of these compounds. Relatively few yeast species showed an inducing effect of SS or CMC in the production of amylase or cellulase activity, respectively. For the majority of the analyzed yeast species, the two enzyme activities were higher when the culture medium was supplemented with glucose than with the corresponding substrate. The higher amylase activity values were obtained at pH 5.4 and 6.2; and at 30 and 37 °C, except for Rh. glacialis isolates, which showed high amylase activity at lower temperatures (10–22 °C). In general, the cellulase activity was high at pH values until 6.2 and from 22–37 °C; however, samples from M. blollopis showed high activity at lower temperatures (4–22 °C). According to peptide mass fingerprint analysis, the main extracellular protein of approximately 70 kDa in Tetracladium sp. culture supernatants with amylase activity indeed corresponds to a glucoamylase.

Methods

Yeast strains, media and culture conditions

The yeasts used in this work are listed in Table 1, and were previosly isolated by our group from soil samples of King George Island at the sub-Antarctic region [26]. The yeasts were routinely cultivated in YM medium (0.3 % yeast extract, 0.3 % malt extract, 0.5 % peptone) supplemented with 1 % glucose at their optimal temperature of growth and orbital shaking at 150 rpm. When specific carbon sources SS and CMC were used, these were supplemented to SD medium (0.1 % yeast nitrogen base, 0.05 % ammonium sulfate). In the case of semi-solid cultures, agar at 1.5 % was added to the medium.
Table 1

Yeast species used in this study

Species

Optimal growth (°C)

Cellulase activity

Amylase activity

Cr. gastricus

22

+

+

Cr. gilvescens

22

-

+

Cr. victoiae

22

+

-

H. watticus

22

+

+

Cryptococcus sp.

15

-

+

Dioszegia sp.

15

-

+

a Tetracladium sp.

22

+

+

D. fristingensis (T9Df1)

15

-

+

Le. fragaria

22

+

-

Leuconeurospora sp. (T11Cd2)

15

-

+

Leuconeurospora sp. (T17Cd1)

22

+

-

Leuconeurospora sp. (T27Cd2)

22

+

-

M. blollopis

15

+

+

M. gelida

15

+

+

M. robertii

15

+

+

Mrakia sp.

15

+

+

Rh. glacialis (TRg8)

15

-

+

Rh. glacialis (T11Rs)

15

-

+

W. anomalus

22

+

-

The indicated enzyme activity reported in previous colony assays [26]. a Formerly D. fristingensis (T11Df)

Carbon source assimilation and fermentation tests

Yeasts were inoculated to reach an initial OD600 of 0.1 in flasks containing YNB medium supplemented with 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 or 2 % w/v of SS or CMC. For each carbon source, 2 % was the maximum concentration that could be used due to an increase in viscosity of the medium. The flasks were incubated at 15 or 22 °C, and the growth was followed by measuring the OD600 of the culture. When the stationary phase was reached, 4 ml of the culture was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min to determine the cell dry weight (CDW) of the pellet dried at 100 °C for 24 h. The fermentation of both carbon sources was evaluated by using Durham test tubes [45] and by quantification of ethanol production using the Ethanol Assay Kit (Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland) according to manufacturer’s instructions. All experiments were carried out in triplicates.

Extraction of extracellular proteins and analysis

Extracellular proteins were obtained by centrifuging 100 ml of yeast cultures at 7,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the obtained supernatants were filtered through a sterile 0.45-μm pore size polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Then, ammonium sulfate was added to reach a final concentration of 80 % saturation and incubated on ice for 1 h followed by centrifugation at 10,000 g at 4 °C for 15 min. The pellet was suspended in 5 ml of Tris buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0) and dialyzed against the same buffer using a dialysis bag with a 10-kDa cut off. The total protein content was determined by the Bradford method (Coomassie Protein Assay Kit, Thermo Scientific, IL, USA) and analyzed on a 10 % SDS-polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then stained with silver nitrate (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).

Enzyme activity analysis

Protein samples were deposited into wells cut in YM-agar medium supplemented with 1 % of SS or CMC. The pH of media was adjusted with phosphate-citrate buffer and the plates were incubated at 4, 10, 15, 22, 30 or 37 °C. For amylase activity assays, the plates were flooded with 1 ml of iodine solution and positive activity was defined as a clear halo around the colony on a purple background [46]. For cellulose activity assays, the plates were flooded with 1 mg/ml of Congo red solution, which was poured off after 15 min and then the plates were flooded with 1 M NaCl for 15 min. Positive cellulase activity was defined as a clear halo around the colony on a red background [47]. Enzyme activities were measured as the distance in mm from the edge of the well to the halo normalized by total amount of protein of the sample.

Peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF)

Processing and analysis of protein samples were performed at the Central Service for Experimental Research (Valencia, Spain). Samples were digested with sequencing grade trypsin (Madison, WI 53711 USA) as described previously [48]. The digestion reactions were stopped with TFA (1 % final concentration) and then concentrated to 20 μL by speed vacuum to analyze 5 μL by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The obtained data were analyzed by Mascot, and only the results with a score greater than 54 (P < 0.05) were considered statistically significant [49].

Availability of supporting data

All the supporting data are included as additional files.

Abbreviations

CMC: 

carboxymethyl cellulose

SS: 

soluble starch

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported through FONDECYT grant 1130333.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile

References

  1. Robinson CH. Cold adaptation in arctic and antarctic fungi. New Phytol. 2001;151:341–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Gounot AM. Psychrophilic and psychrotrophic microorganisms. Experientia. 1986;42:1192–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Margesin R, Miteva V. Diversity and ecology of psychrophilic microorganisms. Res Microbiol. 2011;162:346–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Singh P, Singh SM. Characterization of yeast and filamentous fungi isolated from cryoconite holes of Svalbard. Arctic Polar Biol. 2012;35:575–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavicchioli R, Charlton T, Ertan H, Omar SM, Siddiqui KS, Williams TJ. Biotechnological uses of enzymes from psychrophiles. Microb Biotechnol. 2011;4:449–60.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Amico S, Claverie P, Collins T, Georlette D, Gratia E, Hoyoux A, et al. Molecular basis of cold adaptation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002;357:917–25.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjelic S, Brandsdal BO, Aqvist J. Cold adaptation of enzyme reaction rates. Biochemistry. 2008;47:10049–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Buzzini P, Margesin R. Cold-Adapted Yeasts. In: Białkowska A, Turkiewicz M, editors. Miscellaneous Cold-Active Yeast Enzymes of Industrial Importance. New York: Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
  9. Shivaji S, Prasad GS. Antarctic Yeasts: Biodiversity and Potential Applications. In: Satyanarayana T, Kunze G, editors. Yeast Biotechnology: Diversity and Applications. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2009. p. 3–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Gurung N, Ray S, Bose S, Rai V. A broader view: microbial enzymes and their relevance in industries, medicine, and beyond. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:329121.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Uthumporn U, Shariffa YN, Karim AA. Hydrolysis of native and heat-treated starches at sub-gelatinization temperature using granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;166:1167–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vihinen M, Mantsala P. Microbial amylolytic enzymes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1989;24:329–418.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Janeček Š, Ševčı́k J. The evolution of starch-binding domain. FEBS Lett. 1999;456:119–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Janeček S, Svensson B, MacGregor EA. alpha-Amylase: an enzyme specificity found in various families of glycoside hydrolases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:1149–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. van Zyl WH, Bloom M, Viktor MJ. Engineering yeasts for raw starch conversion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;95:1377–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kasana RC, Gulati A. Cellulases from psychrophilic microorganisms: a review. J Basic Microbiol. 2011;51:572–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Garsoux G, Lamotte J, Gerday C, Feller G. Kinetic and structural optimization to catalysis at low temperatures in a psychrophilic cellulase from the Antarctic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis. Biochem J. 2004;384:247–53.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaudin C, Belaich A, Champ S, Belaich JP. CelE, a multidomain cellulase from Clostridium cellulolyticum: a key enzyme in the cellulosome? J Bacteriol. 2000;182:1910–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Singh A, Hayashi K. Microbial cellulases: protein architecture, molecular properties, and biosynthesis. Adv Appl Microbiol. 1995;40:1–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kádár Z, Szengyel Z, Réczey K. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of industrial wastes for the production of ethanol. Ind Crop Prod. 2004;20:103–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeng R, Xiong P, Wen J. Characterization and gene cloning of a cold-active cellulase from a deep-sea psychrotrophic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. DY3. Extremophiles. 2006;10:79–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Saitoh S, Tanaka T, Kondo A. Co-fermentation of cellulose/xylan using engineered industrial yeast strain OC-2 displaying both beta-glucosidase and beta-xylosidase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;91:1553–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yingling B, Li C, Honglin W, Xiwen Y, Zongcheng Y. Multi-objective optimization of bioethanol production during cold enzyme starch hydrolysis in very high gravity cassava mash. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:8077–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Marques PT, Pérégo C, Le MJF, Borsali R, Soldi V. Study of gelatinization process and viscoelastic properties of cassava starch: Effect of sodium hydroxide and ethylene glycol diacrylate as cross-linking agent. Carbohydr Polym. 2006;66:396–407.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Rahman MS. CRC press; 2008.Google Scholar
  26. Carrasco M, Rozas JM, Barahona S, Alcaino J, Cifuentes V, Baeza M. Diversity and extracellular enzymatic activities of yeasts isolated from King George Island, the sub-Antarctic region. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:251.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Salmon DN, Spier MR, Soccol CR, Vandenberghe LP, Weingartner Montibeller V, Bier MC, et al. Analysis of inducers of xylanase and cellulase activities production by Ganoderma applanatum LPB MR-56. Fungal Biol. 2014;118:655–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pascon RC, Bergamo RF, Spinelli RX, de Souza ED, Assis DM, Juliano L, et al. Amylolytic microorganism from Sao Paulo zoo composting: isolation, identification, and amylase production. Enzyme Res. 2011;2011:679624.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. de Groot PWJ, Brandt BW, Horiuchi H, Ram AFJ, de Koster CG, Klis FM. Comprehensive genomic analysis of cell wall genes in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet Biol. 2009;46:S72–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. van der Kaaij RM, Yuan XL, Franken A, Ram AF, Punt PJ, van der Maarel MJ, et al. Two novel, putatively cell wall-associated and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored alpha-glucanotransferase enzymes of Aspergillus niger. Eukaryot Cell. 2007;6:1178–88.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Iefuji H, Iimura Y, Obata T. Isolation and characterization of a yeast sp. S-2 that produces Raw starch-digesting -amylase, xylanase, and polygalacturonase. Biosci, biotechnol. Biochem. 1994;58:2261–2.Google Scholar
  32. Wanderley KJ, Torres FAG, Moraes LÄMP, Ulhoa CJ. Biochemical characterization of alpha-amylase from the yeast Cryptococcus flavus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;231:165–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Galdino AS, Silva RN, Lottermann MT, Alvares AC, de Moraes LM, Torres FA, et al. Biochemical and Structural Characterization of Amy1: An Alpha-Amylase from Cryptococcus flavus Expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Res. 2011;2011:157294.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsuji M, Singh SM, Yokota Y, Kudoh S, Hoshino T. Influence of initial pH on ethanol production by the Antarctic basidiomycetous yeast Mrakia blollopis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2013;77:2483–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh P, Singh SM, Tsuji M, Prasad GS, Hoshino T. Rhodotorula svalbardensis sp. nov., a novel yeast species isolated from cryoconite holes of Ny-Alesund, Arctic. Cryobiology. 2014;68:122–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Abdullah SK. Extracellular enzymatic activity of aquatic and aero-aquatic conidial fungi. Hydrobiologia. 1989;174:217–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Gomes FC, Safar SV, Marques AR, Medeiros AO, Santos AR, Carvalho C, et al. The diversity and extracellular enzymatic activities of yeasts isolated from water tanks of Vriesea minarum, an endangered bromeliad species in Brazil, and the description of Occultifur brasiliensis f.a., sp. nov. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015;107:597–611.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pathan AA, Bhadra B, Begum Z, Shivaji S. Diversity of yeasts from puddles in the vicinity of midre lovenbreen glacier, arctic and bioprospecting for enzymes and fatty acids. Curr Microbiol. 2010;60:307–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Horowitz NH, Cameron RE, Hubbard JS. Microbiology of the dry valleys of Antarctica. Adv Sci. 1972;176:242–5.Google Scholar
  40. Convey P. The influence of environmental characteristics on life history attributes of Antarctic terrestrial biota. Biol Rev. 1996;71:191–225.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Arnold RJ, Convey P, Hughes KA, Wynn-Williams DD. Seasonal periodicity of physical factors, inorganic nutrients and microalgae in Antarctic fellfields. Polar Biol. 2003;26:396–403.Google Scholar
  42. Juturu V, Wu JC. Microbial cellulases: engineering, production and applications. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014;33:188–203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharma A, Satyanarayana T. Microbial acid-stable α-amylases: characteristics, genetic engineering and applications. Process Biochem. 2013;48:201–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Cobos R, Barreiro C, Mateos RM, Juan-Jose R. Cytoplasmic-and extracellular-proteome analysis of Diplodia seriata: a phytopathogenic fungus involved in grapevine decline. Proteome Sci. 2010;8:46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Durham HE. A simple method for demonstrating the production of gas by bacteria. Br Med J. 1898;1:1387.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hankin L, Anagnostakis SL. The use of solid media for detection of enzyme production by fungi. Mycologia. 1975;67:597–607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Teather RM, Wood PJ. Use of Congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;43:777.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Shevchenko A, Jensen ON, Podtelejnikov AV, Sagliocco F, Wilm M, Vorm O, et al. Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry: large-scale identification of yeast proteins from two dimensional gels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:14440–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999;20:3551–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Carrasco et al. 2016

Advertisement