Skip to main content
  • Methodology article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Development of a serological assay to predict antibody bactericidal activity against non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae

Abstract

Background

Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is a Gram negative microorganism residing in the human nasopharyngeal mucosa and occasionally causing infections of both middle ear and lower respiratory airways. A broadly protective vaccine against NTHi has been a long-unmet medical need, as the high genetic variability of this bacterium has posed great challenges.

Results

In this study, we developed a robust serum bactericidal assay (SBA) to optimize the selection of protective antigens against NTHi. SBA takes advantage of the complement-mediated lysis of bacterial cells and is a key in vitro method for measuring the functional activity of antibodies. As a proof of concept, we assessed the bactericidal activity of antibodies directed against antigens known to elicit a protective response, including protein D used as carrier protein in the Synflorix pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine. Prior to SBA screening, the accessibility of antigens to antibodies and the capacity of the latter to induce C3 complement deposition was verified by flow cytometry. Using baby rabbit serum as a source of complement, the proposed assay not only confirmed the bactericidal activity of the antibodies against the selected vaccine candidates, but also showed a significant reproducibility.

Conclusions

Considering the rapidity and cost-effectiveness of this novel SBA protocol, we conclude that it is likely to become an important tool to prove the capability of antibodies directed against recombinant antigens to induce NTHi in vitro killing and to both select new protective vaccine candidates, and predict vaccine efficacy.

Background

Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is a Gram negative microorganism that differs from the other Hi serotypes for the lack of a polysaccharide capsule. NTHi is a commensal in the human nasopharyngeal mucosa and may occasionally act as a pathogen initiating infections of both the upper and lower respiratory airways, causing conditions such as otitis media (OM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and invasive diseases such as meningitis and sepsis, especially in neonates and the elderly [1-3].

A broadly protective vaccine against NTHi is a current medical need. Indeed, one of the major hurdles to NTHi vaccine development is the high genetic diversity among strains, leading to the necessity to identify antigens carrying functional epitopes able to induce cross-protective antibodies [4].

As NTHi does not express a capsule, the search for alternative vaccine candidates has so far been focused on outer membrane proteins and lipo-oligosaccharide [5]. A protective antigen should express epitopes available for antibody binding on the surface of the intact bacterium. Molecules embedded within the outer membrane or blocked by steric hindrance of adjacent structures, such as sialic acid could be unavailable for antibody binding and therefore unable to generate protective antibodies. Currently, major (P1, P2, P4, P5) and minor (P6, D15, TbpA/B) outer membrane proteins, LPS, and adhesins (HMW, Hia, pili, P5) are being studied, and preclinical results including the use of animal models have been generated. In particular, protective efficacy of PD, OMP26 and P5 was proved using models of otitis (chinchilla model of otitis media) and lung infection (rat model of pulmonary clearance) [6-8]. This approach provided important information on the impact of the host-pathogen relationship on whole tissue, and the interaction between humoral and cellular response. However, these experiments are very expensive, and consequently limit the possibility to screen for strains with different genetic background.

A well-established in vitro method to predict antigen protective ability is the Serum Bactericidal Assay (SBA). The SBA is also referred to as complement-mediated bacterial killing and quantifies bacterial cell death after incubation of bacterial cells with immune serum and a complement source. In particular for Neisseria meningitidis, SBA activity has been shown to highly correlate with immunity to meningococcal disease [9-11] and more recently Borrow’s group has evaluated and validated a novel SBA for Haemophilus influenzae type B [12]. However, SBA was never established for NTHi due to the high susceptibility of this non-encapsulated microorganism to complement-mediated killing. In this study, we modified and optimized SBA to evaluate the functional activity of antibodies generated following mice immunization with a panel of recombinant NTHi antigens already reported to have protective capability in animal models. This assay could constitute a rapid and low cost tool for antigen selection.

Results and discussion

Selection of the antigens to develop a Serum Bactericidal Assay for NTHi

The aim of this study was to set up a robust assay to screen the antigens capable of raising functional antibodies to kill NTHi. First of all, we selected from the literature a panel of proteins already reported to be protective in animal models (Protein E [13], Protein D [14], P6 [15], OMP26 [16], PilA and HtrA [17]). This helped us to set the best working conditions of the assay. Moreover, we used an unrelated protein (that is not present on NTHi surface) as negative control. We selected NHBA from N.meningitidis as unrelated protein-it is a surface protein that is strictly specific for meningococcus.

Surface accessibility of NTHi antigens

Since the prerequisite for the functionality of the assay is that the antigen tested should be exposed on the bacterial surface, we verified the surface exposure of the selected antigens. First of all the antigens were formulated with AL(OH)3 as an adjuvant, and immunized in mice, after which polyclonal antibodies were obtained. As shown in Figure 1, all the antigens tested (PD, PE, P6, OMP26, HtrA and PilA) were well exposed on the surface of live bacteria.

Figure 1
figure 1

NTHi antigens are accessible to antibodies on bacterial surface. Binding of anti-PD, PE, P6, OMP26, HtrA, PilA and anti-176 to live bacteria was evaluated by flow cytometry. Histograms represent a typical experiment out of two performed with similar results. RFI, relative fluorescence intensity. Filled gray line, bacteria incubated with an irrelevant serum; red line, bacteria incubated with antigen specific serum.

Selection of a complement source

Selection of a suitable source of complement represented a crucial step in setting up a SBA. Several lots of sera derived from baby rabbit and guinea pigs were screened to evaluate toxicity. Briefly, 176 strain was incubated for 60 min with different concentration (12.5%, 25% 50%) of baby rabbit or guinea pig complement. Bacteria without complement and bacteria with heat-inactivated complement (dilution factor = 50%) were used as control. The mixture was then plated on agar chocolate plates to evaluate NTHi strain survival. We discarded sera which resulted to be toxic for NTHi, and identified Baby Rabbit serum (lot 7504) as good complement source for the assay (Figure 2). We assumed that a serum was not toxic at the dilution used in the SBA (25%), when the number of bacteria at T60min was more than double the number of targets cells present before the incubation with complement.

Figure 2
figure 2

Selection of complement source. 176 strain was tested for survival at different baby rabbit or guinea pig serum concentrations (12.5%, 25%, 50%) for 60 min. Bacteria without complement and bacteria with heat-inactivated complement (dilution factor 50%) were used as negative control. The results are expressed as % survival at 60 min. The means and standard errors from 3 independent experiments are shown. Error bars represent the SD.

Evaluation of C3 complement deposition

We next assessed the ability of the specific sera to induce complement deposition on NTHi surface. Using flow cytometry analysis, we therefore evaluated if specific antibodies against NTHi antigens were able to promote C3 deposition, a crucial step in complement pathway cascade. Basically, bacteria in exponential phase were incubated with rabbit complement in the absence or presence of increasing amounts of sera from mice immunized with NTHi antigens (Figure 3, lower panel) or 176 strain heat inactivated (Figure 3, upper panel). C3 deposition was detected using anti-rabbit C3 antibody and anti-Rabbit Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugate. As reported in Figure 3, anti-176 as well as anti-PilA, anti-PD and anti-PE antibodies were able to promote C3 component deposition on bacterial surface leading to activation of complement pathway. Serum form mice given alum was used as negative control.

Figure 3
figure 3

Sera against specific antigens promote C3 fragment deposition on NTHi. 176 strain was incubated with rabbit complement in the absence or presence of increasing amounts of sera from mice immunized with NTHi antigens or 176 strain heat inactivated. The amount of C3 deposited on bacteria (mean fluorescence) was measured by flow cytometry. Serum form mice given alum was used as negative control. Histogram tracings from one representative experiment for anti-176 serum are shown in addition to three of the antigens analyzed. RFI, relative fluorescence intensity.

Development of a reproducible serum bactericidal assay

The functionality of the antibodies raised against 176 strain or against specific NTHi antigens was assessed by SBA. To perform the SBA, bacteria in exponential phase were incubated with complement in the absence or presence of increasing amounts of sera from mice immunized with selected antigens. To validate the assay, we evaluated bactericidal activity of antibodies directed against antigens proved to be protective in in vivo models of colonization and infection, such as Protein E [13], Protein D [14], P6 [15], OMP26 [16] and HtrA [17]. As postulated, sera raised against PD, PE, P6, OMP26, HtrA and PilA antigens were able to induce in vitro killing of 176 strain, consistently with their capacity to promote complement deposition. SBA titers obtained vary from protein to protein and it is due to several factors, including antigen density and antibody affinity. Notably, SBA titers well correlated with surface expression of antigens (Figure 1). In particular, PD and HtrA that appeared to be more accessible to antibodies on the bacterial surface, were among the antigens giving higher SBA titers (Table 1). Sera from a) non-immunized mice (pre-immune sera); b) mice immunized with PBS alone; c) mice immunized with adjuvant alone (AL(OH)3); d) mice immunized with an adjuvanted unrelated antigen (NHBA from N. meningitidis) were used as negative controls. None of these sera induced detectable SBA titers (Table 1).

Table 1 Bactericidal activity against 176 strain

Furthermore, given the extensive genetic diversity exhibited by NTHi we validated the bactericidal assay with genetically diverse strains belonging to different clades identified by genome-based population structure of NTHi [4]. Preliminary data show that the assay is applicable also to strains genetically different (data not shown).

Conclusions

Reverse Vaccinology and other profile-based computational approaches [18] allow the identification of a large number of open reading frame encoding for surface proteins, however the subsequent screening for bactericidal epitopes is a clear bottleneck. In vitro SBA has been proved to be a rapid and cost-effective method to identify new vaccine candidates and, as in the case of the Type B meningococcus vaccine, a valid correlate of protection [9-11]. A high genetic diversity not correlating with disease is an important signature of NTHi species and represents a crucial issue in the development of a successful vaccine against this human pathogen. Selection of protective antigens should therefore consider this aspect by supporting the prioritization of candidates carrying functional epitopes able to induce cross-protective antibodies. In this study, we propose a novel SBA for NTHi that would help to identify broadly-protective vaccine candidates through a rapid screening of both antigens and strains.

Methods

Antibodies and reagents

Antibody against C3 complement component was from Calbiochem. Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugate, and Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugate were from Molecular Probes.

Baby rabbit complement and Guinea Pig complement were from Cederlane Labs. AL(OH)3 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

NTHi strain 176 (kindly provided by Richard Moxon and Derek Hood, Oxford University, UK), isolated from a child with otitis media, was used for this study. NTHi was grown on chocolate agar polivitex (BioMerieux) at 37°C with 5% CO2. Brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth (Difco Laboratories) supplemented with 10 μg/mL each of haemin (Fluka Biochemika) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD, Sigma) was used as fluid growth medium. Escherichia coli strains DH5α, HK100 and BL21 (DE3) (Invitrogen) were used for cloning and expression of NTHi antigens. They were cultured at 37°C in Luria Bertani (LB) medium and, when required, supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin.

Cloning of genes coding for vaccine antigens

NTHi genes were cloned into the pET15b + vector (Novagen) using the polymerase incomplete primer extension (PIPE) method [19]. Sequences coding for each protein were amplified by PCR from the 176 genomic DNA, removing the signal peptide (primers are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1 in the supplemental material). PCRs generated mixtures of incomplete extension products; short overlapping sequences were introduced at the ends of these incomplete extension mixtures, which allowed complementary strands to anneal and produce hybrid vector-insert combinations. Escherichia coli HK100 cells [20] were then transformed with vector-insert hybrids. Single ampicillin-resistant colonies were selected and checked for the presence of the recombinant plasmid by PCR. Plasmids from positive clones were isolated and subcloned into competent E. coli BL21(DE3) cells.

Antigen expression, purification and formulation

For protein expression and purification, one single colony of E. coli BL21(DE3) strain expressing NTHI antigens was inoculated in LB plus ampicillin and grown overnight at 37°C, diluted in fresh LB medium and grown at 30°C to an OD600 of 0.6-0.8. Protein over-expression was induced by the addition of 1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG, Sigma) for 3 hours. Recombinant 6 x His-fusion proteins was purified by affinity chromatography on Ni2+-conjugated chelating fast-flow Sepharose 4B resin (Pharmacia). Purity was checked by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis staining with Coomassie blue. Protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Thermo Scientific). Endotoxin content was assessed using the limulus amoebocyte lysis (LAL) test.

Antigens were adsorbed onto alum by incubating 10 μg of each antigen with 2 mg/ml aluminum hydroxide, with slow stirring for few hours at room temperature (RT). The pH and osmolality of the formulation and antigen absorption were determined.

Polyclonal antisera production

In order to produce polyclonal antisera, groups of eight CD1 mice were immunized with 10 μg of each purified Ag adsorbed onto aluminum hydroxide. The recombinant protein was given intraperitoneally on day1. Booster doses were administered on day 21 and 35. Blood samples were taken on day 49. To generate anti-NTHi antibodies, mice were injected with heat inactivated bacteria (108 cfu in each dose) following the same administration and sampling route. Control mice received equal amounts of saline or alum or adjuvanted unrelated antigen. All treatments were performed in accordance with internal animal ethical committee and institutional guidelines.

Complement toxicity assay

Toxicity assay was performed in order to screen the best source of complement to use in the SBA. A panel of baby rabbit and guinea pig sera was tested to evaluate toxicity against NTHi. In particular, serially diluted baby rabbit or guinea pig sera were incubated with mid-log phase bacteria for 1 h at 37°C and the survival rate was calculated for each dilution by CFU counting. The selection of the ideal source of complement was based on two main criteria: the serum should show an activity proportional to its concentration and it should not be toxic for NTHi. We assumed that a serum was not toxic when the number of bacteria at T1hour was more than double the number of target cells present before complement incubation. Heat inactivated sera were used as negative control.

Flow cytometry analysis

Surface exposure of NTHi antigens was assessed by incubating bacteria in exponential phase with sera derived from mice immunized with recombinant proteins for 30 min at 4°C. After washing, cells were stained with anti-Mouse Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugate. Cells were analyzed with a Canto II flow cytometer (Beckton-Dickinson) using Flowjo software. The geometric mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for each population was calculated.

To assess C3 complement component deposition, bacteria in exponential phase were incubated with 25% baby rabbit serum, as a source of complement, plus serial dilution of specific polyclonal anti-sera for 20′ at 37°C, 180 rpm. The capacity of specific sera to promote C3 deposition was revealed using anti-rabbit C3 antibody and anti-Rabbit Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugate. Cells were analyzed with a Canto II flow cytometer (Beckton-Dickinson) by using Flowjo software. The geometric mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for each population was calculated.

Serum bactericidal assay (SBA)

Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae target strain lysis was assessed in the presence of NTHi-specific antibody and complement (antibody mediated, complement-dependent killing). Antisera were tested in a serum bactericidal assay to verify their capacity to induce NTHi in vitro killing. Sera from non-immunized mice (pre-immune sera), mice immunized with PBS alone, mice immunized with adjuvant alone (AL(OH)3) and mice immunized with an adjuvanted unrelated antigen (NHBA from N. meningitidis) were used as negative controls.

Bacteria were subcultured on chocolate round agar plates and incubated ca. 18 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2. Colonies were inoculated in 4 ml of BHI plus hemin (10 μg/ml) and NAD (10 μg/ml) and incubated on a shaker at 37°C with 5% CO2 180 rpm until OD600 = 0.5 (6x108 CFU/ml). Bacteria were centrifuged for 10 minutes, 2000 x g, at room temperature. Supernatants were discarded and the pellet was resuspended in Dulbecco’s PBS containing 1% (w/v) BSA and 0.1% (w/v) glucose (assay buffer). A working dilution of bacteria was made in the assay buffer (1:50000). Serial 2-fold dilutions of sera (previously heat inactivated 30′ 56°C) were prepared by adding 25 μl of pre-diluted sera (starting from 1/4 dilution) to 25 μl of assay buffer previously added to the wells, mixing, and then transferring 25 μl into the next well (the procedure was repeated from column 2 to 10) (Figure 4C).

Figure 4
figure 4

NTHi SBA protocol. Bacteria are diluted in Dulbecco’s PBS containing 1% (w/v) BSA and 0.1% (w/v) glucose (A); they are then incubated with baby rabbit complement (B), and serially diluted sera raised against the selected antigens (C). The microtiter plate layout for the NTHi SBA assay is shown in panel (D).

The assay was performed in sterile 96-well plates in a final volume of 50 μl per well, as represented in Figure 4D. Bacteria working dilution was added to each well (12.5 μl corresponding to 200 cfu). Then 12.5 μl of active complement were added to the wells in Columns 1 to 11, while heat inactivated complement was added in column 12 (Figure 4D). Indeed, two internal controls were introduced in the assay: a Complement Dependent Control, to measure the killing induced by the complement per se in absence of antibodies (column 11, Figure 4D) and a Complement Independent Control, to measure the killing induced by serum alone in presence of heat inactivated complement (column 12, Figure 4D).

Bacteria at time zero (T0) were plated in duplicate. The plate was incubated for 1 h at 37°C with 5% (v/v) CO2 in a humidified atmosphere and on a soft orbital rotating shaker. Bacteria at T60min were sampled, and spotted onto agar plates (all wells were plated in duplicate). Agar plates were incubated overnight at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% (v/v) CO2. On the following day, colony forming units (cfu) were counted for T0 and T60min in order to evaluate the bactericidal titer of each serum. The number of colonies in column 11 is the number of viable cells. We assumed that a serum dilution has bactericidal activity when after 1 h of incubation at 37°C, more than 50% of the bacteria were killed with respect to T0. The bactericidal antibody titer was expressed as the reciprocal of the final serum dilution yielding ≥50% killing at T60min as compared with the average for control wells (T0).

Abbreviations

NTHi:

Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae

SBA:

Serum bactericidal assay

OM:

Otitis media

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

References

  1. Foxwell AR, Kyd JM, Cripps AW. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae: pathogenesis and prevention. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(2):294–308.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gkentzi D, Slack MP, Ladhani SN. The burden of nonencapsulated Haemophilus influenzae in children and potential for prevention. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25(3):266–72. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32835310a4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy TF, Faden H, Bakaletz LO, Kyd JM, Forsgren A, Campos J, et al. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae as a pathogen in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(1):43–8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318184dba2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Chiara M, Hood D, Muzzi A, Pickard DJ, Perkins T, Pizza M, et al. Genome sequencing of disease and carriage isolates of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae identifies discrete population structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(14):5439–44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403353111.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Poolman JT, Bakaletz L, Cripps A, Denoel PA, Forsgren A, Kyd J, et al. Developing a nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) vaccine. Vaccine. 2000;19 Suppl 1:S108–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakaletz LO, Kennedy BJ, Novotny LA, Duquesne G, Cohen J, Lobet Y. Protection against development of otitis media induced by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae by both active and passive immunization in a chinchilla model of virus-bacterium superinfection. Infect Immun. 1999;67(6):2746–62.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bakaletz LO, Leake ER, Billy JM, Kaumaya PT. Relative immunogenicity and efficacy of two synthetic chimeric peptides of fimbrin as vaccinogens against nasopharyngeal colonization by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae in the chinchilla. Vaccine. 1997;15(9):955–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kyd JM, Cripps AW. Potential of a novel protein, OMP26, from nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae to enhance pulmonary clearance in a rat model. Infect Immun. 1998;66(5):2272–8.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldschneider I, Gotschlich EC, Artenstein MS. Human immunity to the meningococcus. II. Development of natural immunity. J Exp Med. 1969;129(6):1327–48.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldschneider I, Gotschlich EC, Artenstein MS. Human immunity to the meningococcus. I. The role of humoral antibodies. J Exp Med. 1969;129(6):1307–26.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borrow R, Balmer P, Miller E. Meningococcal surrogates of protection–serum bactericidal antibody activity. Vaccine. 2005;23(17–18):2222–7. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Townsend K, Ladhani SN, Findlow H, Borrow R. Evaluation and validation of a serum bactericidal antibody assay for Haemophilus influenzae type b and the threshold of protection. Vaccine. 2014;32(43):5650–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hallstrom T, Blom AM, Zipfel PF, Riesbeck K. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae protein E binds vitronectin and is important for serum resistance. J Immunol. 2009;183(4):2593–601. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0803226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson RW, McGillivary G, Denoel P, Poolman J, Bakaletz LO. Abrogation of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D function reduces phosphorylcholine decoration, adherence to airway epithelial cells, and fitness in a chinchilla model of otitis media. Vaccine. 2011;29(6):1211–21. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Badr WH, Loghmanee D, Karalus RJ, Murphy TF, Thanavala Y. Immunization of mice with P6 of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae: kinetics of the antibody response and IgG subclasses. Vaccine. 1999;18(1–2):29–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Riedmann EM, Lubitz W, McGrath J, Kyd JM, Cripps AW. Effectiveness of engineering the nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae antigen Omp26 as an S-layer fusion in bacterial ghosts as a mucosal vaccine delivery. Hum Vaccin. 2011;7(Suppl):99–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cates GA, Yang YP, Klyushnichenko V, Oomen R, Loosmore SM. Properties of recombinant HtrA: an otitis media vaccine candidate antigen from non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae. Dev Biol (Basel). 2000;103:201–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rappuoli R. Reverse vaccinology. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2000;3(5):445–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. He K, Daviglus ML. A few more thoughts about fish and fish oil. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(3):350–1. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2004.12.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Klock HE, White A, Koesema E, Lesley SA. Methods and results for semi-automated cloning using integrated robotics. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2005;6(2–3):89–94. doi:10.1007/s10969-005-3084-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Brunella Brunelli, Dan Granoff, Mary Deadman, Derek Hood and Richard Moxon for helpful discussion and advices. They are grateful to Liliana Alleri, Manuele Martinelli, Stefano Bonacci and Marco Tortoli for their scientific support to the study. They also thank Antonietta Maiorino for manuscript editing.

This work was supported by internal funding from Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics s.r.l. (a GSK company).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marco Soriani or Silvia Rossi-Paccani.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors do not have a commercial or other association that might pose a conflict of interests. BB, AG, SM, RP, BA, MS, MGP, SRP are employees of Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics s.r.l. (a GSK company). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

GE BA RP MGP MS SRP conceived and designed the experiments. GE BB SRP GA SM performed the experiments. GE MS MGP SRP analyzed the data. GE MS MGP SRP wrote the paper. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional file

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Oligonucleotides used in this study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ercoli, G., Baddal, B., Alessandra, G. et al. Development of a serological assay to predict antibody bactericidal activity against non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae . BMC Microbiol 15, 87 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0420-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0420-x

Keywords