Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Use of Ensure® nutrition shakes as an alternative formulation method for live recombinant Attenuated Salmonella Typhi vaccines

BMC Microbiology volume 15, Article number: 76 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To be effective, orally administered live Salmonella vaccines must first survive their encounter with the low pH environment of the stomach. To enhance survival, an antacid is often given to neutralize the acidic environment of the stomach just prior to or concomitant with administration of the vaccine. One drawback of this approach, from the perspective of the clinical trial volunteer, is that the taste of a bicarbonate-based acid neutralization system can be unpleasant. Thus, we explored an alternative method that would be at least as effective as bicarbonate and with a potentially more acceptable taste. Because ingestion of protein can rapidly buffer stomach pH, we examined the possibility that the protein-rich Ensure® Nutrition shakes would be effective alternatives to bicarbonate.

Results

We tested one Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and three Salmonella Typhi vaccine strains and found that all strains survived equally well when incubated in either Ensure® or bicarbonate. In a low gastric pH mouse model, Ensure® worked as well or better than bicarbonate to enhance survival through the intestinal tract, although neither agent enhanced the survival of the S. Typhi test strain possessing a rpoS mutation.

Conclusions

Our data show that a protein-rich drink such as Ensure® Nutrition shakes can serve as an alternative to bicarbonate for reducing gastric pH prior to administration of a live Salmonella vaccine.

Background

Live recombinant attenuated Salmonella-vectored vaccines (RASV) have the potential to provide protection against a variety of human non-Salmonella pathogens at low cost. By using the Salmonella cells to express a heterologous protective antigen, RASVs can induce humoral and cellular immune responses directed at a pathogen of interest [1]. RASVs have the additional advantage of stimulating mucosal immune responses, due to their oral route of immunization. Oral delivery provides RASVs with the opportunity to invade and colonize the intestinal gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT), where they actively interact with the host immune system to stimulate robust humoral, mucosal and cellular immune responses [2]. To allow the vaccine cells to reach the intestinal tissues more rapidly, human subjects are frequently required to fast prior to immunization as a means to clear the gastrointestinal tract of food [3]. However, fasting also causes the gastric pH of humans to fall below 2.0 [4,5]. This poses a non-trivial challenge to the success of the immunization, as Salmonella species, particularly S. Typhi [6], are not particularly resistant to low pH (succumbing below pH 3.0), and the mutations necessary for attenuation in RASVs often impose additional sensitivity to acid [7-11]. Our lab has constructed RASV strains exhibiting regulated-delayed attenuation [12]. These S. Typhi-derived RASVs, χ9633(pYA4088), χ9639(pYA4088) and χ9640(pYA4088), are susceptible to a number of environmental stresses, including low pH [13]. To administer an acid-sensitive vaccine strain via the oral route, the vaccine must be given using a strategy that not only actively protects the vaccine cells from gastric acid, but also does not negatively affect vaccine viability or the development of an immune response following vaccination.

Most researchers address the problem of low gastric pH by administering an antacid such as sodium bicarbonate prior to the RASV [14-17]. The antacid rapidly neutralizes the gastric acid, allowing the vaccine cells to transit the gastric compartment under neutral or mildly acidic conditions [18,19]. This combination of a liquid RASV formulation with antacid is highly effective and promotes the development of protective immune responses [20,21]. However, bicarbonate is not without problems. In order to efficiently neutralize gastric acid, a surprisingly large volume of bicarbonate must be given, as gastric mixing is not efficient enough to thoroughly disperse small volumes of bicarbonate completely throughout the stomach [22,23]. In addition, bicarbonate has a rather unpleasant taste to most palates and efforts to improve this aspect will positively enhance the experience of the volunteers in a clinical trial or vaccinees receiving licensed vaccines. Flavoring agents are sometimes added to vaccine formulations for this reason [24].

In preparation for a clinical trial to assess the three RASV strains listed above, we wanted to investigate the administration of high concentrations of protein as an alternative to bicarbonate. Protein is capable of buffering gastric acid and raises the gastric pH within minutes of ingestion [25,26]. As a food-borne pathogen, Salmonella appears to take advantage of this gastric acid buffering during infection scenarios. In the presence of protein-rich food, the infectious dose of Salmonella is significantly lower than in the absence of food [27]. Thus, we hypothesized that the administration of protein, specifically Ensure® Nutrition shakes, immediately prior to and following immunization would provide the same protection from the low pH gastric environment as bicarbonate. Using Ensure® also provides a carrier with a taste likely to be more pleasant than bicarbonate for most vaccinees. We examined the survival of S. Typhi wild type and vaccine strains when suspended in Ensure® or a bicarbonate solution and how these compounds, when administered to mice with a low gastric pH, influenced survival during gastric transit.

Results

Survival of recombinant attenuated Salmonella Typhi vaccine strains in bicarbonate and Ensure®

To be an effective vaccine formulation, the carrier or co-administered substance must not negatively affect the viability of the vaccine cells. We monitored the effect of bicarbonate and Ensure® (milk chocolate flavor) on the viability of the three S. Typhi vaccine strains and model S. Typhimurium strain for four hours (Figure 1). Most of the S. Typhi strains, including χ9633, χ9639, ISP1820 and Ty2, and both of the S. Typhimurium strains we tested underwent a statistically significant increase in numbers when incubated in Ensure®, indicating that Ensure® could support the growth of these strains. Cell numbers of strains suspended in bicarbonate tended to decrease over time, but the decrease was statistically significant only for strain Ty2 (T0 vs T4, p = 0.035) (Figure 1B). Interestingly, there were no significant changes in cell numbers for strains χ8438 and χ9640 in either bicarbonate or Ensure® (Figure 1C). There were statistical differences in the numbers of cells recovered from Ensure compared to bicarbonate at the 2 and 4 h time points for a number of strains (Figure 1A, B, D), primarily due to the fact that Ensure® apparently supported the growth of these strains while bicarbonate did not. We also examined survival in vanilla and strawberry Ensure® and the flavor did not affect strain viability (data not shown).

Figure 1
figure 1

Survival of Salmonella vaccine and wild-type parent strains in Ensure and sodium bicarbonate. (A) S. Typhi strains χ9633 and χ3744; (B) S. Typhi strains χ9639 and χ3769; (C) S. Typhi strains χ9640 and χ8438; (D) S. Typhimurium χ9558 and χ3761. Percent CFU/ml was calculated as follows: (# CFU at tn/# CFU at t0) x 100 for each strain. Wild-type strains that exhibited a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the number of viable cells in Ensure over viable cells in bicarbonate are marked with an asterisk (*). Vaccine strains exhibiting a significant increase in viable cells (p < 0.05) between Bicarbonate and Ensure treatments are marked with a double asterisk (**). Data are the combined results of three independent experiments.

Full size image

Bicarbonate and Ensure® protect vaccine cells during low pH gastric transit

Another characteristic of an effective RASV delivery formulation is that it must protect cells from the low pH of the gastric environment. To examine the ability of bicarbonate and Ensure® to combat gastric pH, these were used to buffer the stomach pH of mice. Because the gastric pH of a fasted mouse is about pH 4.0 and the gastric pH of a fasted human is about pH 1-2 [4,5,28], gastric acid secretion was induced in mice by subcutaneous histamine injection (see Methods section) prior to immunization to better mimic the situation in humans. Using this protocol, the pH in the mouse stomach is reduced to around 1.5 [29]. Mice received either bicarbonate or Ensure® prior to and immediately following immunization. Control mice received no treatment. Vaccine viability was measured following gastric transit (Figure 2). Compared to the no treatment group, administration of Ensure® significantly increased the number of viable cells that reached the small intestine for two of the S. Typhi strains and for the S. Typhimurium strain (p = 0.0019 for χ9633(pYA4088), p = 0.0256 for χ9640(pY4088) and p = 0.0006 for χ9558(pYA4088). This was a 599-, 75.0- and 647-fold increase, respectively, in the geometric mean number of viable cells to reach the ileum. Bicarbonate similarly improved the survival of χ9640(pYA4088) (p = 0.0190) and χ9558(pYA4088) (p = 0.0379) during gastric transit, resulting in a 41.0- and 8.79-fold increase in the geometric mean number of cells to reach the ileum, respectively. Administration of bicarbonate did not significantly impact the survival of χ9633(pYA4088) or χ9639(pYA4088) (p = 0.2317 and 0.4945, respectively) compared to the no treatment controls.

Figure 2
figure 2

Survival of RASV strains during low pH gastric transit. Histamine-treated mice were inoculated orally with 109 CFU of (A) χ9633(pYA4088, pWSK129), (B) χ9639(pYA4088, pWSK129), (C) χ9640(pYA4088, pWSK129) or (D) χ9558(pYA4088, pWSK129). Mice received either 1.3% sodium bicarbonate, chocolate Ensure® or no treatment prior to and immediately following immunization to neutralize gastric acid. The number of viable vaccine cells in the small intestine was quantified one hour after immunization. Data are presented as the number of CFU/g intestine of individual mice, with the geometric mean of the group displayed as a solid horizontal line. Groups that exhibited a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the number of viable vaccine cells in the small intestine over the control group are marked with an asterisk (*). Groups exhibiting a significant difference (p < 0.05) between Bicarbonate and Ensure treatments are marked with a double asterisk (**). Data are the combined results of two independent experiments (8 mice total).

Full size image

The Ensure treatment was better than bicarbonate at increasing the gastric transit survival of strains χ9633(pYA4088) (p = 0.0207) and χ9558(pYA4088) (p = 0.0003). Interestingly, the survival of strain χ9639(pYA4088) was not impacted by either Ensure or bicarbonate treatments (Figure 2B). Further, this strain survived gastric transit in mice that did not receive bicarbonate or Ensure® somewhat better than the other S. Typhi strains (Figure 2A, B, C) although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.06).

Discussion

The vast majority of clinical RASV trials have made use of sodium bicarbonate as a means to protect vaccine cells from low gastric pH. In fact, field trials with the licensed typhoid vaccine strain Ty21a demonstrated that the administration of bicarbonate produced a superior immune response as compared to other vaccine formulation strategies [30,31]. Our results are consistent with the idea that ingestion of a buffering substance prior to oral immunization promotes the survival of vaccine cells. The administration of bicarbonate prior to and immediately following immunization significantly improved the survival of both S. Typhi χ9640(pYA4088) and S. Typhimurium χ9558(pYA4088) during gastric transit. Interestingly, strain χ9640(pYA4088) was the most immunogenic, among the three S. Typhi strains tested here, in a recent clinical trial [32]. Sodium bicarbonate is generally regarded as safe, and has been shown to have no effect on the viability of wild-type Salmonella [33].

Our results demonstrated that high concentrations of protein administered before and after immunization can act as a substitute for bicarbonate. Ensure® provided a greater degree of protection from the gastric environment than bicarbonate for S. Typhi strain χ9633(pYA4088, pWSK129) (Figure 2A) and S. Typhimurium strain χ9558(pYA4088, pWSK129) (Figure 2D), and provided protection equivalent to bicarbonate for S. Typhi strain χ9640(pYA4088, pWSK129) (Figure 2C). No effect of bicarbonate or Ensure® was observed for the rpoS Ty2 derivative, S. Typhi strain χ9639(pYA4088, pWSK129) (Figure 2B).

Neither sodium bicarbonate nor Ensure® was able to significantly increase the survival of χ9639(pYA4088) during gastric transit. This is interesting, because of the four RASV strains tested in this study, χ9639 is the only rpoS mutant, due to the fact that parent strain Ty2 carries a mutation in rpoS [34]. Salmonella rpoS mutants are significantly more sensitive to low pH than strains with a functional RpoS because they are unable to sustain an acid tolerance response (responsible for protecting cells against low pH) for more than 20 minutes [7]. The problem may have been exacerbated by the presence of the ΔPfur81::TT araC PBAD fur mutation in χ9639, as Fur and RpoS jointly regulate induction of the acid tolerance response [7,35]. The amount of Fur present in a ΔPfur81::TT araC PBAD fur S. Typhi mutant is substantially lower than a wild-type strain, regardless of the arabinose concentration during growth and, with regard to survival at low pH, is indistinguishable from a fur deletion mutant (29). Note that strain χ9640 is also a derivative of Ty2, but in this strain, the rpoS gene has been replaced with a functional gene from ISP1820 (parent of χ9633). The S. Typhimurium strain χ9558 has a functional rpoS gene, since its parent is RpoS+. Thus, it is likely that a functional rpoS is required in order to benefit from bicarbonate and Ensure treatment, at least in this genetic background.

Conclusions

The Ensure® nutrition shake was able to act as a substitute for bicarbonate during oral inoculation to enhance bacterial survival during passage through a low gastric pH compartment. Ensure® provided protection better than or equivalent to bicarbonate for all of the strains tested. The failure of both Ensure® and bicarbonate to protect an rpoS mutant during gastric transit suggests that in future clinical trials, investigators should carefully evaluate the degree of protection necessary for the specific RASV strain being evaluated and perform a careful evaluation of the buffering agent used to neutralize gastric pH.

Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids and culture conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Strain χ9633 is derived from S. Typhi ISP1820, an RpoS+ strain. Strains χ9639 and χ9640 are derived from parent strain Ty2, which is RpoS−. Strain χ9640 was rendered RpoS+ by transduction [13]. For routine use, strains were propagated in LB medium (which contains 0.1% glucose) [36] supplemented with 0.05% arabinose and 0.1% mannose at 37°C. Some experiments included KT broth, which is a proprietary medium used to support rapid, high-density bacterial growth, similar in composition to terrific broth [13]. For antibiotic selection of strains containing pWSK129, kanamycin was used at a concentration of 30 μg/ml. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Thermo Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) unless otherwise indicated.

Table 1 Salmonella vaccine strains and plasmids used in this study
Full size table

Formulation stability assays

Strains were grown in KT broth to an optical density at 600 nm of 2.0, then were pelleted and resuspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 5 x 1010 CFU/ml. Cells were diluted 1:15 into either a 1.3% sodium bicarbonate solution or Ensure® Nutrition shake (milk chocolate flavor) and incubated at 37°C for four hours. Viability at each time point was assessed by serial dilution and plating onto LB agar containing 0.2% arabinose.

Gastric transit assays

This study was approved by the Arizona State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Six week old, female BALB/c mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA, USA) were fasted without food or water for 6 h prior to the start of the experiment. Mice received the histamine H1-receptor antagonist chlorpheniramine (0.3 mg/kg) subcutaneously to prevent allergy/anaphylaxis symptoms. Prior to inoculation, low gastric pH was induced by subcutaneous injection of histamine dihydrochloride (10 mg/kg) [37,38]. All bacterial strains used in the gastric transit assays contained the low copy number plasmid pWSK129 (Kanr) to allow for precise quantitation of strain numbers in the non-sterile environment of the gastrointestinal tract. We did not observe any Kanr organisms in the normal intestinal flora of the mice. Strains were grown to late log phase (optical density at 600 nm of 0.9), then pelleted and resuspended in PBS at a concentration of 5 x 1010 CFU/ml. Groups of 5 mice were orally inoculated 50 min after the administration of histamine [29]. For each inoculation, the low gastric pH was treated with sodium bicarbonate, Ensure, or left untreated. Groups that were treated with bicarbonate received 40 μl of a 1.3% sodium bicarbonate solution orally 10 minutes prior to inoculation and an additional 10 μl 10 minutes after [17]. Groups that were treated with Ensure received 20 μl of Ensure® Nutrition shake (milk chocolate flavor) 10 minutes prior to inoculation and an additional 20 μl 10 minutes after [32]. Mice were euthanized 1 h after inoculation and the entire small intestine was removed, homogenized and serially diluted. Samples were plated onto LB agar containing 0.2% arabinose with kanamycin to determine the number of viable bacteria present following low pH gastric transit.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA). Statistical analyses of data from the gastric transit assays were performed using the Mann-Whitney test. Survival curves were analyzed using Sidak’s multiple comparison test.

Abbreviations

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

Kanr :

Resistant to the antibiotic kanamycin

References

  1. Curtiss 3rd R, Xin W, Li Y, Kong W, Wanda SY, Gunn B, et al. New technologies in using recombinant attenuated Salmonella vaccine vectors. Crit Rev Immunol. 2010;30:255–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Curtiss III R, Zhang X, Wanda S-Y, Kang HY, Konjufca V, Gunn B, et al. Induction of host immune responses using Salmonella-vectored vaccines. In: Brodgen K, Minion F, Cornick N, Stanton T, Zhange Q, Nolan L, Wannemuehler M, editors. Virulence mechanisms of bacterial pathogens. 4th ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cardenas L, Clements JD. Oral immunization using live attenuated Salmonella spp. as carriers of foreign antigens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992;5:328–42.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Verdu E, Viani F, Armstrong D, Fraser R, Siegrist HH, Pignatelli B, et al. Effect of omeprazole on intragastric bacterial counts, nitrates, nitrites, and N-nitroso compounds. Gut. 1994;35:455–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kararli TT. Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1995;16:351–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hone DM, Harris AM, Levine MM. Adaptive acid tolerance response by Salmonella typhi and candidate live oral typhoid vaccine strains. Vaccine. 1994;12:895–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee IS, Lin J, Hall HK, Bearson B, Foster JW. The stationary-phase sigma factor sigma S (RpoS) is required for a sustained acid tolerance response in virulent Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 1995;17:155–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin J, Lee IS, Frey J, Slonczewski JL, Foster JW. Comparative analysis of extreme acid survival in Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, and Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:4097–104.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bearson BL, Wilson L, Foster JW. A low pH-inducible, PhoPQ-dependent acid tolerance response protects Salmonella Typhimurium against inorganic acid stress. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:2409–17.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall HK, Foster JW. The role of fur in the acid tolerance response of Salmonella Typhimurium is physiologically and genetically separable from its role in iron acquisition. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:5683–91.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robbe-Saule V, Coynault C, Norel F. The live oral typhoid vaccine Ty21a is a rpoS mutant and is susceptible to various environmental stresses. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;126:171–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Curtiss III R, Wanda SY, Gunn BM, Zhang X, Tinge SA, Ananthnarayan V, et al. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains with regulated delayed attenuation in vivo. Infect Immun. 2009;77:1071–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi H, Santander J, Brenneman KE, Wanda SY, Wang S, Senechal P, et al. Live recombinant Salmonella Typhi vaccines constructed to investigate the role of rpoS in eliciting immunity to a heterologous antigen. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11142.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tacket CO, Sztein MB, Losonsky GA, Wasserman SS, Nataro JP, Edelman R, et al. Safety of live oral Salmonella typhi vaccine strains with deletions in htrA and aroC aroD and immune response in humans. Infect Immun. 1997;65:452–6.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hindle Z, Chatfield SN, Phillimore J, Bentley M, Johnson J, Cosgrove CA, et al. Characterization of Salmonella enterica derivatives harboring defined aroC and Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system (ssaV) mutations by immunization of healthy volunteers. Infect Immun. 2002;70:3457–67.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilman RH, Hornick RB, Woodard WE, DuPont HL, Snyder MJ, Levine MM, et al. Evaluation of a UDP-glucose-4-epimeraseless mutant of Salmonella typhi as a live oral vaccine. J Infect Dis. 1977;136:717–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frey SE, Bollen W, Sizemore D, Campbell M, Curtiss 3rd R. Bacteremia associated with live attenuated χ8110 Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi ISP1820 in healthy adult volunteers. Clin Immunol. 2001;101:32–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Simmons TC, Hogan DL, Selling JA, Maxwell V, Isenberg JI. The effect of sodium bicarbonate versus aluminum-magnesium hydroxide on postprandial gastric acid in duodenal ulcer patients. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986;8:146–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kajikawa A, Nordone SK, Zhang L, Stoeker LL, LaVoy AS, Klaenhammer TR, et al. Dissimilar properties of two recombinant Lactobacillus acidophilus strains displaying Salmonella FliC with different anchoring motifs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:6587–96.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Black RE, Levine MM, Ferreccio C, Clements ML, Lanata C, Rooney J, et al. Efficacy of one or two doses of Ty21a Salmonella typhi vaccine in enteric-coated capsules in a controlled field trial. Vaccine. 1990;8:81–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levine MM, Ferreccio C, Abrego P, Martin OS, Ortiz E, Cryz S. Duration of efficacy of Ty21a, attenuated Salmonella typhi live oral vaccine. Vaccine. 1999;17 Suppl 2:S22–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holdsworth JD, Johnson K, Mascall G, Roulston RG, Tomlinson PA. Mixing of antacids with stomach contents. Another approach to the prevention of the acid aspiration (Mendelson’s) syndrome. Anaesthesia. 1980;35:641–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen CT, Toung TJ, Haupt HM, Hutchins GM, Cameron JL. Evaluation of the efficacy of Alka-Seltzer Effervescent in gastric acid neutralization. Anesth Analg. 1984;63:325–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmed T, Bhuiyan TR, Zaman K, Sinclair D, Qadri F. Vaccines for preventing enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD009029.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saint-Hilaire S, Lavers MK, Kennedy J, Code CF. Gastric acid secretory value of different foods. Gastroenterology. 1960;39:1–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maner J, Pond W, Loosli J, Lowrey R. Effect of isolated soybean protein and casein on the gastric pH and rate of passage of food residues in baby pigs. J Anim Sci. 1962;21:49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Waterman SR, Small PL. Acid-sensitive enteric pathogens are protected from killing under extremely acidic conditions of pH 2.5 when they are inoculated onto certain solid food sources. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:3882–6.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McConnell EL, Basit AW, Murdan S. Measurements of rat and mouse gastrointestinal pH, fluid and lymphoid tissue, and implications for in-vivo experiments. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008;60:63–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brenneman KE, Willingham C, Kilbourne JA, Curtiss 3rd R, Roland KL. A low gastric pH mouse model to evaluate live attenuated bacterial vaccines. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87411.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Black R, Levine MM, Young C, Rooney J, Levine S, Clements ML, et al. Immunogenicity of Ty21a attenuated Salmonella typhi given with sodium bicarbonate or in enteric-coated capsules. Dev Biol Stand. 1983;53:9–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wahdan MH, Serie C, Germanier R, Lackany A, Cerisier Y, Guerin N, et al. A controlled field trial of live oral typhoid vaccine Ty21a. Bull World Health Organ. 1980;58:469–74.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Frey SE, Lottenbach KR, Hill H, Blevins TP, Yu Y, Zhang Y, et al. A Phase I, dose-escalation trial in adults of three recombinant attenuated Salmonella Typhi vaccine vectors producing Streptococcus pneumoniae surface protein antigen PspA. Vaccine. 2013;31:4874–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang J, Dogovski C, Hocking D, Tauschek M, Perugini M, Robins-Browne RM. Bicarbonate-mediated stimulation of RegA, the global virulence regulator from Citrobacter rodentium. J Mol Biol. 2009;394:591–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Robbe-Saule V, Norel F. The rpoS mutant allele of Salmonella typhi Ty2 is identical to that of the live typhoid vaccine Ty21a. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;170:141–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Foster JW. The acid tolerance response of Salmonella Typhimurium involves transient synthesis of key acid shock proteins. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:1981–7.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bertani G. Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1951;62:293–300.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chew CS, Chen X, Bollag RJ, Isales C, Ding KH, Zhang H. Targeted disruption of the Lasp-1 gene is linked to increases in histamine-stimulated gastric HCl secretion. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;295:G37–44.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Furutani K, Aihara T, Nakamura E, Tanaka S, Ichikawa A, Ohtsu H, et al. Crucial role of histamine for regulation of gastric acid secretion ascertained by histidine decarboxylase-knockout mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;307:331–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li Y, Wang S, Scarpellini G, Gunn B, Xin W, Wanda SY, et al. Evaluation of new generation Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccines with regulated delayed attenuation to induce immune responses against PspA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:593–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Curtiss 3rd R, Hassan JO. Nonrecombinant and recombinant avirulent Salmonella vaccines for poultry. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1996;54:365–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hone DM, Harris AM, Chatfield S, Dougan G, Levine MM. Construction of genetically defined double aro mutants of Salmonella typhi. Vaccine. 1991;9:810–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Felix A, Pitt RM. The pathogenic and immunogenic activities of Salmonella typhi in relation to its antigenic constituents. J Hyg (Lond). 1951;49:92–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Santander J, Wanda SY, Nickerson CA, Curtiss III R. Role of RpoS in fine-tuning the synthesis of Vi capsular polysaccharide in Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi. Infect Immun. 2007;75:1382–92.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang RF, Kushner SR. Construction of versatile low-copy-number vectors for cloning, sequencing and gene expression in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1991;100:195–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kang HY, Srinivasan J, Curtiss 3rd R. Immune responses to recombinant pneumococcal PspA antigen delivered by live attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine. Infect Immun. 2002;70:1739–49.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Xin W, Wanda SY, Li Y, Wang S, Mo H, Curtiss 3rd R. Analysis of type II secretion of recombinant pneumococcal PspA and PspC in a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine with regulated delayed antigen synthesis. Infect Immun. 2008;76:3241–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Grand Challenges in Global Health grant 37863. The authors would like to thank Hayley Cardamone, Elizabeth Griffith and Giorgio Scarpellini for their excellent technical assistance in conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

    Karen E Brenneman, Amanda Gonzales, Kenneth L Roland & Roy Curtiss 3rd

  2. School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

    Roy Curtiss 3rd

  3. Present address - 23andMe, Inc, 1390 Shorebird Way, Mountain View, CA, 94043, USA

    Karen E Brenneman

Authors
  1. Karen E Brenneman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda Gonzales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenneth L Roland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roy Curtiss 3rd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth L Roland.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

RC, KB and KR conceived and designed the experiments; KB and AG performed the experiments; RC, KB, AG and KR interpreted the data; and KB and KR wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ informations

KB has been involved in preparing live attenuated Salmonella vaccine masterseed for use in clinical trials and in developing new technologies and animal models for Salmonella vaccines to enhance safety and immunogenicity. She is currently working in the private sector.

KLR is a research associate professor at Arizona State University and has over 15 years experience working with live bacterial vaccines and developing animal models.

AG is a research associate at Arizona State University.

RC is a professor at The Biodesign Institute and School of Life Sciences at Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287. He has been working in the field of live attenuated Salmonella vaccines for over 25 years and has conducted and/or contributed to a number of human clinical trials.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brenneman, K.E., Gonzales, A., Roland, K.L. et al. Use of Ensure® nutrition shakes as an alternative formulation method for live recombinant Attenuated Salmonella Typhi vaccines. BMC Microbiol 15, 76 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0409-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0409-5

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us