Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Detection of quorum-sensing-related molecules in Vibrio scophthalmi

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1
BMC Microbiology20088:138

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-138

©  García-Aljaro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

  • Received: 21 April 2008
  • Accepted: 13 August 2008
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Cell-to-cell communication (also referred to as quorum sensing) based on N-acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) is a widespread response to environmental change in Gram-negative bacteria. AHLs seem to be highly variable, both in terms of the acyl chain length and in the chemical structure of the radicals. Another quorum sensing pathway, the autoinducer-2-based system, is present both in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In this study the presence of signal molecules belonging to both quorum sensing signalling pathways was analysed in the marine symbiotic species Vibrio scophthalmi.

Results

Three AHL-like signal molecules were detected in V. scophthalmi supernatants with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens sensor assay. This observation was further supported by the decrease in the presence of these signal molecules after cloning and expression of lactonase AiiA from Bacillus cereus in the V. scophthalmi strains. One of the signal molecules was identified as N-(3-hydroxy dodecanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone. V. scophthalmi was also shown to carry a functional LuxS synthase. The coding sequence for a luxS-like gene was obtained showing a maximum similarity of 78% with Vibrio vulnificus. Analysis of the translated sequence revealed that the sequenced luxS gene carried the conserved domain, which is common to luxS sequences found in other species, and which is essential for LuxS enzymatic activity.

Conclusion

The data are consistent with the presence of quorum-sensing signal molecules from both AHL- and autoinducer 2-based quorum sensing systems in V. scophthalmi, which are homologous to others previously described in various Vibrio species. How this bacterium interacts with other bacteria and eukaryotic cells to compete ecologically with other intestinal bacteria present in the fish Scophthalmus maximus warrants further investigation.

Keywords

  • Lactone
  • Homoserine
  • Sensor Strain
  • Vibrio Species
  • luxS Gene

Background

Quorum sensing is an extensive system whereby bacteria can communicate not only with members of their own species, but also with other species to coordinate their behaviour in response to population density, thereby modulating the expression of specific genes in a population-density dependent manner. This phenomenon, known as quorum sensing (the term proposed by [1], relies on the production and sensing of one or more secreted low-molecular-mass signal molecules, the extracellular concentration of which is related to the population density of the producing organism. Once the signal molecule has reached a critical concentration, equivalent to a certain cell density, the population elicits a particular response. This mechanism has been demonstrated in various Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. In addition, various biological functions have been shown to be regulated by these molecules either directly or indirectly, including bioluminescence in Vibrio species [2], the expression of virulence factors (Erwinia sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia, E. coli O157:H7, Vibrio cholerae) [3–7], and biofilm formation and swarming motility in P. aeruginosa and B. cepacia [8, 5], among others.

Two main types of quorum-sensing signalling pathways have been described for Gram-negative bacteria: the acylhomoserine lactone (AHL)-based system and the autoinducer 2-based system, which is described below. The first AHL-based quorum-sensing system described was involved in the control of bioluminescence in V. fischeri via the LuxR/I system [9, 10]. LuxI synthesizes the diffusible signal molecule N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone, which increases in concentration as the cell density increases. At a critical concentration, LuxR first binds the signal molecule and then activates the expression of target genes. Genes homologous with this system have been found in several Gram-negative bacteria, although N-acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) seem to be highly variable, both in terms of the acyl chain length and in the chemical structure of the radicals. Moreover, different AHLs synthases have been described in different quorum sensing signalling pathways. For instance, in V. harveyi a 3-hydroxy-C4-HSL is synthesized by the LuxM synthase and received by luxN protein. The genes coding for these proteins show no homology to the previously described LuxR/I quorum sensing system. The complex quorum sensing circuit also differ from other previously reported systems as stated below [11]. It has also to be noted that some bacteria have been shown to express enzymes that are able to interfere with AHL-based quorum-sensing systems from other species: acylases, which remove the side chain from the lactone ring from the AHLs by hydrolyzing the connecting amide bond between the ring and the side chain [12] and lactonases, which hydrolyze the lactone ring of the AHLs [13].

On the other hand, bacteria have been shown to possess a different mechanism for interspecies communication, namely the LuxS (AI-2) system previously described [14]. The LuxS is an autoinducer synthase produced by many diverse bacteria, including both Gram-negative and Gram-positive species [14]. luxS encodes an S-ribosyl homocysteinase, which converts S-ribosyl homocysteine from the methyl cycle into homocysteine (which is then returned to the active methyl cycle), as well as the autoinducer 2 [15], a borate diester of the cyclized 4,5-dihydroxy-2,3-pentanedione [16]. The AI-2 system has been shown to regulate several physiological activities including pathogenicity (though the control of toxins and other virulence expression factors), motility, biofilm formation, antibiotic production, and bioluminescence, among others (see review [15]).

Vibrio scophthalmi belongs to the highly heterogeneous Vibrionaceae family, which is comprised of 64 species, including both free-living and symbiotic species characterized by mutualistic or pathogenic relationships [17]. V. scophthalmi was first described in association with turbot (Scophthalmus maximus), being the most abundant Vibrio species found in intestinal bacterial populations [18]. It has been shown that V. scophthalmi maintains host specificity, despite showing a different phenotype pattern in 15–57 day-old larvae [19]. This fact, together with the finding that this organism is not the most abundant Vibrio spp in those waters surrounding the fish, led us to hypothesise that the benefits of turbot gut colonization by V. scophthalmi could be dependent upon a quorum-sensing system that responded when a sufficient number of bacteria were present in the gut.

Some symbiotic species belonging to the Vibrionaceae family have been shown to regulate bioluminescence through a complicated network of quorum-sensing systems involving the lux genes. Homologues to the LuxR/I system have been described for V. fischeri, V. anguillarum, V. cholerae, V. logei and V. parahaemolyticus [20–23]. In V. harveyi, the quorum-sensing as stated above, is a complex circuit consising of a multichannel two-component phosphorelay signal transduction pathway. In this bacterium the LuxR/I system is not present. Instead, the LuxM/N system works in parallel as well as the CqsA/S system with the LuxS/PQ to regulate a transcriptional activator, LuxR (not similar to other LuxR-type quorum-sensing proteins). [11]. Another complex quorum system was also described in V. cholerae [24].

Here we study the quorum-sensing signal synthases in V. scophthalmi, focusing on the two most common signal molecules in Gram-negative bacteria described above (AHLs and AI-2). The expression of AHLs was analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) using different AHL sensor strains. Recombinant V. scophthalmi strains expressing an aiiA gene that coded for a lactonase were obtained and the loss of AHL production investigated. The presence of AI-2 synthase was analyzed by using the V. harveyi autoinducer bioluminescence bioassay [2] while the luxS gene, which is known as the synthase for AI-2, was detected by PCR and then sequenced.

Results and discussion

Identification of AHLs autoinducers

The V. scophthalmi strains A089 and A102 were grown overnight in different growth media (mLB, mTSB, mPW, and AB) and the supernatant was analysed for the presence of AHL-like molecules. Three different signal spots were detected in the TLC assay performed with the A. tumefaciens strain NTL4 (pZLR4) (Fig. 1a), which were not present in the medium alone used as negative control, suggesting the presence of three AHL-like molecules in the supernatant of V. scophthami. The retention factor (Rf) of the three AHL-like molecules was 0.62 (± 0.055), 0.46 (± 0.038) and 0.25 (± 0.018), from higher to lower Rf, respectively, as a result of three independent experiments. These three AHL-like molecules detected by the A. tumefaciens sensor strain were produced with any of the employed growth medium: mLB, mTSB, mPW, and AB (data not shown). Moreover, as shown on Fig. 1b, all three molecules were detected by TLC in the mid-exponential growth phase and maintained over the stationary phase.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Detection of AHLs by thin layer chromatography (TLC) with the A. tumefaciens NTL4 (pZLR4) strain used as a biosensor (A) and AHL detection along the growth curve in mTSB medium (B). A) lane 1: C8-HSL standard (Fluka); lane 2: Vibrio scophthalmi A089 strain; lane 3: V. scophthalmi A102 strain; lane 4: Negative control, mTSB alone; lane 5: Negative control, no sample added; 6: C6-HSL standard (Fluka). B) Arrow indicates the beginning of the detection of the three signalling spots, which were detected at the same time from the mid-log phase.

In order to further characterise these molecules, different AHL standards and different sensor strains, which have been shown to detect previously described AHLs, were used. The autoinducer bioassay for the detection of AHLs, which employed the BB886 V. harveyi sensor strain, showed no induction of the luminescence signal compared with the negative control. Neither signal was detected with the Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 or the Pseudomonas putida F117 (pAS-C8) and P. putida F117 (pKR-C12) sensor strains. This may be related to the varying sensitivities of these sensor strains to a wide range of AHLs. The C. violaceum forward bioassay [25], detects preferably short chain AHLs, preferably HHL, although it has been also shown to detect 3 hydroxy-C6-HSL [26] but not longer chain AHLs. The P. putida F117 (pAS-C8) sensor strain is sensitive to C8-HSL and P. putida F117 (pKR-C12) is highly sensitive to C12-HSL, 3-oxo-C12-HSL, C10-HSL, and 3 oxo-C10-HSL [27]. The fact that it was not possible to detect any signal in the V. harveyi BB886 autoinducer bioassay suggests that the putative AHLs from V. scophthalmi detected with the A. tumefaciens assay are sufficiently different from that of V. harveyi to be recognised.

Chemical characterisation of the AHL-like molecules

Detailed analyses of the AHL-like molecules detected were carried out exclusively with the strain V. scophthalmi A102, since both strains presented the same TLC pattern. Two different culture media, mTSB and mPW, were evaluated for growing V. scophthalmi A102 in order to carry out the extraction of AHLs. Due to the high background observed with the mTSB medium, we decided to use the mPW culture medium. Only that extract corresponding to the lower Rf spot resulted in a structure composition similar to an AHL, which hypothetically corresponded to an N-(3-hydroxy dodecanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone (N-3-hydroxy-C12-HSL). This molecule matched the empirical formula C16H29NO4 + H+ with mass (m/z) 300.2167 and an error of 0.39 ppm (see Fig. 2). As far as we know, this constitutes the first description of an AHL in V. scophthalmi; moreover, it has proven different from those produced by other Vibrio species. It was not possible to identify any recognizable AHL-like structures in the other signalling spot extracts, even after carrying out four independent extraction experiments.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Chromatograph obtained from the lower AHL signalling spot from the TLC. A peak of 300.2414 was obtained with a Mariner TOF MS, whose exact mass was later confirmed as m/z 300.2167 after HPLC and mass spectrometry with electrospray ionisation analysis. This molecule matched the empirical formula C16H29NO4 (with an error of 0.39 ppm) for M and hypothetically corresponds to a molecular structure of a hydroxylated-C12HSL. A peak of 282.2256 was also observed which could represent loss of OH group due to fragmentation of the molecule, and a 599.4826 peak, an aggregation of two molecules. Other peaks were originated from components of the medium used for growing the bacterium.

The high background levels caused by other molecules in relation to the amount of AHL produced of the other two putative AHLs may have hindered the detection of these molecules. However it can not be discarded that these two signalling spots that were detected with the A. tumefaciens sensor strain, but not detected by HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry, might indeed not represent AHLs but AHL-derived or AHL-regulated molecules, that would induce non-specifically the A. tumefaciens sensor strain, since this sensor is known to be activated non-specifically.

Acylhomoserine lactone signal synthases have been studied in other Vibrio species. This species have been shown to produce several AHLs, which are produced by different synthases: V. anguillarum (hexanoyl homoserine lactone and 3-hydroxy-hexanoyl homoserine lactone synthesized by VanM (homologous to the LuxM from V. harveyi) and the 3-oxo-decanoyl homoserine lactone, synthesized by VanI, a LuxI homologue) [26], V. fischeri (3-hydroxy-butanoyl homoserine lactone, synthesized by LuxI, and octanoyl homoserine lactone synthesized by AinS, a LuxM homologue) [28], V. harveyi (3-hydroxy-butanoyl homoserine lactone, synthesized by LuxM) [11], V. vulnificus (butanoyl homoserine lactone, 3-oxo-decanoyl homoserine lactone, 3-oxo-dodecanoyl homoserine lactone, and in minor amounts, hexanoyl homoserine lactone, 3-oxo-octanoyl homoserine lactone, and 3-oxo-tetradecanoyl homoserine lactone, synthesized by a LuxI homologue), and V. salmonicida (3-oxo-hexanoyl homoserine lactone and hexanoyl homoserine lactone, synthesized by a LuxI homologue) [29].

Heterologous expression of aiiA in V. scophthalmi

In order to confirm the presence of AHLs, AHL-derived or AHL-regulated substances in the supernatant of Vibrio scophthalmi, the lactonase gene aiiA from the Bacillus cereus strain A24 was subcloned into the pACYC184 plasmid and then electroporated into E. coli DH5α. This plasmid was subsequently transferred to the Vibrio strain by conjugation. We utilized two strains for those experiments addressing heterologous expression: V. scophthalmi A089 and V. scophthalmi A102. As measured by both, diffusion assays in agar plates and TLC, expression of the aiiA gene in both strains reduced autoinducer accumulation (Fig. 3). We constructed a control strain by conjugating the pACYC184 plasmid without the aiiA gene. As this control strain showed no AHL reduction, we attributed the decreased AHL production in recombinant strains to heterologous expression of the lactonase gene, confirming that these three putative autoinducers possessed an AHL-like structure or were AHL-regulated.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Effects of aiiA gene introduction in V. scophthalmi in the reduction of the AHL levels detected in a TLC assay following exposure to the sensor strain A. tumefaciens NTL4(pZLR4). Lane 1: V. scophthalmi A089; lane 2: V. scophthalmi A089 pACYC184-aiiA; lane 3 V. scophthalmi A102; lane 4: V. scophthalmi A102-aiiA; lane 5: V. scophthalmi A102 control strain with the pACYC184 plasmid, but without the aiiA gene.

This finding indicates not only that lactonase is expressed in the Vibrio strains, but also that its activity results from the hydrolysis of AHL lactone bonds, as has been reported in other bacterial species [30]. We demonstrate that this lactonase is able to degrade hydroxylated AHLs, such as N-3-hydroxy-C12-HSL, thereby increasing its substrate spectrum. These findings are consistent with other studies that have shown that lactonases from the Bacillus genus are characterized by certain variability in their capacity to degrade different AHLs [13]. This is true for the lactonase from the B. cereus strain, which reduced the concentrations of C6-HSL, oxo-C12-HSL and C4-HSL from P. aeruginosa to non-detectable levels [4].

Detection of a LuxS synthase in Vibrio scophthalmi

The presence of LuxS activity in the supernatants from the V. scophthalmi A089 strain was assessed by using the V. harveyi reporter strain BB170 in a bioluminescence assay. Two negative controls were included, consisting of the incubation medium alone, and the medium with the sensor strain. Although we tested two different culture media, mTSB and the mPW, the former was discarded due to the fact that some of the components of the mTSB induced the sensor strain producing a false positive reaction. As shown in Fig. 4, the maximum induction level for the reporter strain was obtained in those supernatants from V. scophthalmi A089 grown in mPW medium, which corresponded to the late logarithmic phase. Here, we recorded a maximum induction value of 35% with respect to the positive control used in this assay, V. harveyi BB120.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Detection of LuxS activity in the supernatant of the V. scophthalmi A089 strain by a bioluminescence assay using the V. harveyi reporter strain BB170. Bars, relative light units produced by stimulation of the V. harveyi BB170 reporter strain after addition of supernatant from V. scophthalmi A089, taken at different time points; squares, growth of V. scophthalmi as measured by OD at 600 nm.

These molecules were likely to be synthesized by the AI-2 synthase LuxS, whose coding sequence was determined for V. scophthalmi, and which exhibited a maximum similarity to the V. vulnificus luxS gene (78%). The coding sequence consisted of 519 bp, which is common to other luxS sequences from various Vibrio species. This sequence was submitted to the GenBank database under the accession number [GenBank:EF363481]. A phylogenetic tree of different Vibrio luxS sequences is shown on Fig. 5a. The translated sequence revealed that the sequenced luxS gene carried a conserved domain common to luxS sequences found in other species, which is essential for LuxS enzymatic activity (Fig. 5b, sites 54–58, HTLEH). The sites 118–126, NKIPELNEY, representing a hypothetical phosphorylation site [31], was also conserved. This domain has already been detected in luxS homologous sequences from Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Yersinia sp., and Shigella sonnei, among others [31]. All of these findings support the contention that V. scophthalmi possesses a functional LuxS synthase.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Phylogenetic tree based on luxS homologous sequences from different Vibrio species. A) Phylogenetic tree based on the luxS gene sequence following the neighborjoining clustering method using ArboDraw. B) Protein coding sequence alignment of different homologous LuxS protein sequences. Alignment of the translated genes was carried out using the Multalin program [41] and edited with Gendoc. Accession numbers:V. mimicus, [GenBank:AB232376], V. cholerae [GenBank:AB114425], V. anguillarum [GenBank:DQ466077], V. algynolyticus [GenBank:AY391122], V. harveyi [GenBank:AF120098], V. splendidus [GenBank:NZ_AAMR01000072], V. vulnificus [GenBank:AF305637], V. fischeri [GenBank:CP000020], V. angustum [GenBank:NZ_AAOJ01000005].

Conclusion

This study confirms the presence of quorum-sensing signal molecules in V. scophthalmi from the AHL-based and type 2 (AI-2)-based systems. How this bacterium interacts with other bacteria and eukaryotic cells to compete ecologically with other intestinal bacteria present in the fish Scophthalmus maximus warrants further investigation. In this way, in vivo and in vitro analyses will be needed, so that we can understand precisely how these different networks are connected.

Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. All strains were grown at 30°C, agitated at 180 rpm in LB for Escherichia coli, or modified (i.e., the same medium with a final concentration of 2% NaCl) TSB (mTSB) (Difco, Barcelona, Spain) or LB (mLB) [32] for Vibrio strains, unless otherwise stated. In order to detect AHLs, different media were used for growing V. scophthalmi, mTSB, mLB, AB (autoinducer bioassay medium [2], and modified peptoned water (mPW) (i.e., peptone water containing 2% NaCl (w/v)). When necessary, the concentration of the antibiotics used was as follows: 25 μg/ml tetracycline, 10 μg/ml chloramphenicol and 25 μg/ml chloramphenicol for counter selecting Vibrio recombinants and E. coli, respectively, and 100 μg/ml ampicillin for E. coli. TCBS medium (Oxoid S.A., Madrid, Spain) was used for selection of specific Vibrio strains.
Table 1

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

Strains or Plasmids

Characteristics

Reference or source

Strains

  

Vibrio scophthalmi A089

Turbot isolate, CECT 4638T

[18]

Vibrio scophthalmi A102

Turbot isolate

[18]

Vibrio scophthalmi A089-aiiA strain

A089 strain with the aiiA gene cloned into pACYC184 plasmid, Clr

This study

Vibrio scophthalmi A102-aiiA strain

A102 strain with the aiiA gene cloned into pACYC184 plasmid, Clr

This study

E. coli DH5α

F-Φ80d lacZΔM15endA1hsdR17(rk- mk-) supE44 thi-1 gyrA96Δ(lacZYA-argF)

[37]

E. coli HB101 (pRK2073)

Mobilizing strain; Spr

Biomedal

E. coli One Shot cells

Used for transformation Experiments

Invitrogen

Sensor strains

  

A. tumefaciens NTL4(pZLR4)

AHLs sensor strain, Gmr

[34]

C. violaceum CV026

AHLs sensor strain

[25]

V. harveyi BB866

AI-1 indicator strain, BB120 luxP::Tn5

[2]

V. harveyi BB170

AI-2 indicator strain, BB120 luxN::Tn5

[42]

V. harveyi BB120

wild-type strain

[2]

P. putida F117 (pAS-C8)

AHLs sensor strain, Gmr

[27]

P. putida F117 (pKR-C12)

AHLs sensor strain, Gmr

[27]

Plasmids

  

pCR2.1-TOPO

TA cloning vector; Ampr, Kmr

Invitrogen

pGEM-T-easy

TA cloning vector; Ampr

Promega

pACYC184

Broad-host range expression vector, Tcr, Clr

[36]

pACYC184-aiiA

Broad-host range expression vector carrying the aiiA gene from Bacillus cereus strain A24; Clr

This study

pME6863

Broad-host range expression vector carrying the aiiA gene from Bacillus cereus strain A24; Tcr

[4]

Antibiotic abbreviations used in this study: Ampicillin (Amp), Kanamycin (Km), Spectinomycin (Sp), Chloramfenicol (Cm), Trimethoprim (Tri), Tetracycline (Tc); Spanish Type Culture Collection (CECT).

Detection of AHLs by thin layer chromatography (TLC)

AHLs were extracted as follows: for analytical TLC, 5 ml free-cell overnight cultures of the relevant strains were mixed 1:1 with acidified ethyl acetate. The solvent phase was recovered with a pipette and residual water in the extract was eliminated by adding anhydrous magnesium sulphate. The extract was then filtered through a Whatman paper 3 MM, dried with nitrogen flux air, and resuspended in 20 μl of ethyl acetate. For preparative TLC, we used the same procedure except that the extract was rotary evaporated instead of nitrogen air-dried.

The presence of AHLs in the extracts was tested by C18 reverse-phase TLC (Uniplate RPS Reverse-Phase Hydrocarbon Impregnated Silica Gel; Analtech, Sigma-Aldrich, Barcelona, Spain) using methanol/water (60:40, v/v) [33]. Different QS-sensor strains were employed to test for the presence of AHLs (Table 1). Briefly, the plates were dried and overlaid with 50 ml of soft agar; LB for C. violaceum, and AB for A. tumefaciens, containing 20 ml of an overnight culture of the corresponding sensor strain to give a final concentration of 0.7% agar (w/v). For A. tumefaciens, gentamicin (30 μg/ml) and X-Gal (80 μg/ml) were added. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 30°C; the emergence of blue spots was considered a positive signal for the presence of AHLs [34]. For Pseudomonas putida sensor strains (Table 1) LB with 25 μg/ml gentamicin was used instead. The presence of AHLs was determined by emission of fluorescence that was detected by illumination with blue light by using an HQ 480/40 filter (AHF-Analysentechnik) in combination with an halogen lamp as a light source in a dark box equipped with a light sensitive camera (Hamamatsu photonics, Herrsching, Germany) with a Pentax CCTV camera lens and an HQ 535/20 filter.

Identification of AHL molecules

Extracts were prepared from 1 l of overnight-free-cell culture supernatant extracted with ethyl-acetate, as described above. It was then concentrated to 1 ml by rota-evaporation. TLC was subsequently carried out and the signalling spots were analyzed separately by cutting off the silica from the plates and extracting the AHLs in 1 ml of ethyl-acetate. The silica was then discarded and the solvent phase was resuspended in 0.5 ml of methanol prior to analysis.

Identification of AHLs was carried out at the "Serveis Cientifico-Tècnics" of the University of Barcelona by HPLC coupled with Mass Spectrometry and Electrospray Ionisation using an API™ – Mariner TOF device (Applied Biosystems) based on the protocol described previously [35].

Empirical formula confirmation

Confirmation of the AHL formula was performed at the "Unitat d'Espectrometria de Masses" of the University of Barcelona. The system used consisted of an Agilent LC/MSD TOF coupled to an Agilent 1100 Series HPLC. The TOF was equipped with a dual-nebulizer electrospray source, which allows continuous introduction of an internal reference mass compound at a low concentration for automatic internal mass calibration. The instrument scanned from 100 to 1000 m/z. This range included two reference mass compounds: Purine m/z: 121.050873 and HP-0921 m/z: 922.009798. Resolution 10000 at m/z: 922.009798. Instrumental parameters were as follows: Positive ESI Capillary 4 KV; Fragmentor 215 V; Gas temperature: 300°C, Nebulizer gas (N2) 15 p.s.i. (1 p.s.i. = 6.9 kPa), drying gas (N2) 7 l min-1.1 μl of the sample, extracted as indicated above, was pumped into the source at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min with a mixture of H2O:CH3CN 1:1 1% (v/v) formic acid as eluent. Spectra from the appropriate chromatogram were averaged and the suspected molecular ion was then selected (m/z: 300.2170). Possible formulas were determined by using the elemental composition calculator built into the data analysis software, and applying constraints on the elemental composition.

DNA isolation and nucleotide sequencing

Plasmid DNA was isolated with the Qia Prep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, California, United States). Genomic DNA was isolated with the Qiagen DNA Blood Kit (Qiagen). DNA sequencing was performed with the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit 3.1 (Applied Biosystems).

Cloning of the aiiAgene on the broad host-cloning vector pACYC184

The aiiA gene from the Bacillus cereus A24 strain, coding for a lactonase, was subcloned from the pME6860 plasmid onto the pACYC184 plasmid [36], following a variation of the method previously described [4]. Briefly, the aiiA gene was amplified by PCR (3 min at 95°C; 21 cycles of 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 50°C, 2 min at 72°C; 10 min at 72°C) from the DNA plasmid pME6860. The primers used for this amplification were designed as follows: aiiA-F-Bam: ACgTggATCCCgCAggATCCATATgACAgTAAAgAAgCTT and aiiA-R-Sal: gCTggTCgACCgTCgACTATATATATTCAgggAA. Restriction sites for BamHI and SalI are underlined and the ribosome-binding site is written in bold. The PCR product was subcloned into the pGEM-T-easy vector (Promega, Barcelona, Spain) following the manufacturer's instructions. E. coli strains carrying the vector construction were screened on LB plates containing 100 μg ampicillin ml-1 (Sigma Aldrich) and 50 μg 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactosidase (X-Gal)/ml (Invitrogen, Barcelona, Spain) used for the blue-white selection. The resulting plasmid was electroporated into E. coli DH5α. The pACYC184-aiiA vector was constructed by cloning the aiiA gene from the pGEM-T-easy vector by sequentially cleaving with the BamHI and SalI restriction enzymes and ligating into the pACYC184 vector [37]. The aiiA gene was then sequenced in both strands to ensure that no mutations had occurred during the PCR reaction. The construct pACYC184-aiiA expressed aiiA from the vectors' constitutive tetracycline promoter.

Conjugative plasmid transfer

Plasmids were delivered to Vibrio strains by triparental mating as previously described [38], using the helper strain E. coli HB101 (pRK2073), the donor strain E. coli (pACYC184-aiiA), and the Vibrio scophthalmi recipient strain A089 and A102. TCBS medium supplemented with 10 μg/ml chloramphenicol was used for counter selection of donor, helper, and untransformed recipient cells. The plates were incubated overnight and yellow colonies were selected and tested for the presence of the plasmid and the aiiA gene using the primers and conditions described above. Two recombinant strains were selected for further study: V. scophthalmi A089-aiiA and V. scophthalmi A102-aiiA. To confirm that the transconjugants were V. scophthalmi, sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was also performed using the universal primers previously described [39].

Effects of aiiAgene expression on recombinant strains

The effects of lactonase aiiA expression on the AHL accumulation levels in recombinant strains was analyzed visually by inducing the A. tumefaciens sensor strain by AHL-molecules separated by TLC, as described above. Growth kinetic analysis were also performed with the V. scophthalmi A089 and A102 strains, as well as the respective recombinants carrying the pACYC184-aiiA plasmid and the pACYC184 plasmid alone

Bioluminescence assay for detecting AHL (AI-1) and autoinducer 2 (AI-2) quorum-sensing signal molecules

An overnight culture of V. scophthalmi was prepared and inoculated into fresh medium (1:100) in a final volume of 200 ml and incubated with agitation at 30°C, taking a 5-ml aliquot every hour in order to analyze the kinetics of autoinducer production. The absorbance of the culture was measured at 600 nm, centrifuged, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter (Millipore Corporation, Barcelona, Spain) and kept at -20°C until analysis. V. harveyi indicator strains BB886 (sensor AI-1; sensor AI-2 defective) and BB170 (sensor AI-1 defective, sensor AI-2), as well as the positive control BB120 (AI-1 producer; AI-2 producer) [2], were used to detect the presence of autoinducers in the culture supernatants. Induction of the sensor strain was measured using a Lambda Fluoro 320 Plus reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, Vermont, USA) and evaluated with the KC4 software (Bio-Tek, Instruments, Winooski, Vermont, USA). The results are expressed as the fold induction of the reporter strain over background when buffer or medium alone was added to the reporter. All assays were repeated at least three times.

LuxS detection and sequencing of the gene

The presence of a LuxS-like molecule in the V. scophthalmi A089 strain was assessed by detection of LuxS activity following the bioluminescence method previously described [40] using the media and culture conditions stated in the previous section. Detection of the luxS gene was also performed by PCR. To this end, a set of degenerate primers was designed based on the sequence of previously reported luxS gene sequences recorded in the GenBank database with the following accession numbers: V. vulnificus [GenBank:NC_004459], V. parahaemolyticus [GenBank:BA000031], V. alginolyticus [GenBank:AY391122] V. harveyi [GenBank: GenBank:AF120098], and V. fischeri [GenBank:NC_006840]. The sequences of these primers within the luxS gene were as follows: LuxSF1-5'ATGCCWTTRYTVGAYAG 3' and LuxSR2-5' TCRTCRTTYTTRTTHAC 3'. The PCR conditions were as follows: 5 min at 95°C; 35 cycles: 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 45°C, 1 min at 72°C; 10 min at 72°C. Two amplimers were obtained, and that which presented a similar size to the control strain was sequenced as described above. The similarity to the previously reported luxS sequences was then analyzed. In order to obtain the complete coding sequence of the gene, we designed an inverted PCR. For this purpose, genomic DNA was digested overnight with an NstI restriction enzyme (Promega) and ligated with T4-DNA ligase (Invitrogen). The resulting ligated DNA molecules were amplified using a new set of primers: the LuxSF3 5' GAGCTGAATGAATACCA 3', designed from the previously sequenced amplimer, and a newly degenerated primer based on the sequences described above, LuxSR1 5' CCCATHGGYGADATATC 3'. The same PCR conditions were used except that the annealing temperature was set at 50°C. The resulting amplimer was sequenced using the same primers described above (LuxSF3 and LuxSR1), producing an overlapping sequence to the amplimer previously obtained, which allowed us to sequence the entire gene (519 bp). The complete gene sequence was confirmed by PCR using the primer previously described LuxSF1 and primer LuxSRseq, 5'-TTAATCGACGCGAAGCTCAT 3', which was located downstream from the luxS gene coding sequence deduced from the obtained sequence.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Part of this work was supported by the Generalitat de Catalunya, the BE2005 program, and the project of the Consolidated Research Group of the Catalan Government 2005SGR00592. We are grateful to the team of Juan Imperial from the Polytechnic University of Madrid and Julia Wopperer from the University of Zürich for their scientific and technical assessments. We would also like to thank Coni Reimmann and Joan Tomas for providing the pME6863 and pACYC184 plasmids, respectively, and the "Serveis Cientifico-Tècnics" from the University of Barcelona.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 645, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
(2)
Department of Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse, 107, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland

References

  1. Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP: Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176: 269-275.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bassler BL, Wright M, Showalter RE, Silverman MR: Intercellular signalling in Vibrio harveyi: sequence and function of genes regulating expression of luminescence. Mol Microbiol. 1993, 9: 773-786.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Whitehead NA, Byers JT, Commander P, Corbett MJ, Coulthurst SJ, Everson L, Harris AK, Pemberton CL, Simpson NJ, Slater H, Smith DS, Welch M, Williamson N, Salmond GP: The regulation of virulence in phytopathogenic Erwinia species: quorum sensing, antibiotics and ecological considerations. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002, 81: 223-231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Reimmann C, Ginet N, Michel L, Keel C, Michaux P, Krishnapillai V, Zala M, Heurlier K, Triandafillu K, Harms H, Défago G, Haas D: Genetically programmed autoinducer destruction reduces virulence gene expression and swarming motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microbiology. 2002, 148: 923-932.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Huber B, Riedel K, Hentzer M, Heydorn A, Gotschlich A, Givskov M, Molin S, Eberl L: The cep quorum-sensing system of Burkholderia cepacia H111 controls biofilm formation and swarming motility. Microbiology. 2001, 147: 2517-2528.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Anand SK, Griffiths MW: Quorum sensing and expression of virulence in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003, 85: 1-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Camara M, Hardman A, Williams P, Milton D: Quorum sensing in Vibrio cholerae. Nat Genet. 2002, 32: 217-218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies DG, Parsek MR, Pearson JP, Iglewski BH, Costerton JW, Greenberg EP: The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science. 1998, 280: 295-298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nealson KH, Platt T, Hastings JW: Cellular control of the synthesis and activity of the bacterial luminescent system. J Bacteriol. 1970, 104: 313-322.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nealson KH, Hastings JW: Bacterial bioluminescence: its control and ecological significance. Microbiol Rev. 1979, 43: 496-518.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Henke JM, Bassler BL: Three parallel quorum-sensing systems regulate gene expression in Vibrio harveyi. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 6902-6914.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lin YH, Xu JL, Hu J, Wang LH, Ong SL, Leadbetter JR, Zhang LH: Acyl-homoserine lactone acylase from Ralstonia strain XJ12B represents a novel and potent class of quorum-quenching enzymes. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 47: 849-860.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong YH, Xu JL, Li XZ, Zhang LH: AiiA, an enzyme that inactivates the acylhomoserine lactone quorum-sensing signal and attenuates the virulence of Erwinia carotovora. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 3526-3521.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schauder S, Shokat K, Surette MG, Bassler BL: The LuxS family of bacterial autoinducers: biosynthesis of a novel quorum-sensing signal molecule. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 41: 463-476.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Xavier KB, Bassler BL: LuxS quorum sensing: more than just a numbers game. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003, 6: 191-197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen X, Schauder S, Potier N, Van DA, Pelczer I, Bassler BL, Hughson FM: Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron. Nature. 2002, 415: 545-549.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Thompson FL, Gevers D, Thompson CC, Dawyndt P, Naser S, Hoste B, Munn CB, Swings J: Phylogeny and molecular identification of vibrios on the basis of multilocus sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71 (9): 5107-5115.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cerda-Cuellar M, Rossello-Mora RA, Lalucat J, Jofre J, Blanch AR: Vibrio scophthalmi sp. nov., a new species from turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997, 47: 58-61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cerda-Cuellar M, Blanch AR: Determination of Vibrio scophthalmi and its phenotypic diversity in turbot larvae. Environ Microbiol. 2004, 6: 209-217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Showalter RE, Martin MO, Silverman MR: Cloning and nucleotide sequence of luxR, a regulatory gene controlling bioluminescence in Vibrio harveyi. J Bacteriol. 1990, 172: 2946-2954.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Engebrecht J, Silverman M: Nucleotide sequence of the regulatory locus controlling expression of bacterial genes for bioluminescence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15: 10455-10467.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nishiguchi MK, Nair VS: Evolution of symbiosis in the Vibrionaceae: a combined approach using molecules and physiology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003, 53: 2019-2026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Milton DL, Hardman A, Camara M, Chhabra SR, Bycroft BW, Stewart GS, Williams P: Quorum sensing in Vibrio anguillarum: characterisation of the vanI/vanR locus and identification of the autoinducer N-(3-oxodecanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 3004-3012.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller MB, Skorupski K, Lenz DH, Taylor RK, Bassler BL: Parallel quorum sensing systems converge to regulate virulence in Vibrio cholerae. Cell. 2002, 110: 303-314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McClean KH, Winson MK, Fish L, Taylor A, Chhabra SR, Camara M, Daykin M, Lamb JH, Swift S, Bycroft BW, Stewart GS, Williams P: Quorum sensing and Chromobacterium violaceum: exploitation of violacein production and inhibition for the detection of N-acylhomoserine lactones. Microbiology. 1997, 143: 3703-3711.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Milton DL, Chalker VJ, Kirke D, Hardman A, Cámara M, Williams P: The LuxM homologue VanM from Vibrio anguillarum directs the synthesis of N-(3-hydroxyhexanoyl)homoserine lactone and N-hexanoylhomoserine lactone. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 3537-3547.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Steidle A, Sigl K, Schuhegger R, Ihring A, Schmid M, Gantner S, Stoffels M, Riedel K, Givskov M, Hartmann A, Langebartels C, Eberl L: Visualization of N-acylhomoserine lactone-mediated cell-cell communication between bacteria colonizing the tomato rhizosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001, 67: 5761-5770.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilson L, Kuo A, Dunlap PV: AinS and a new family of autoinducer synthesis proteins. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177: 6946-6951.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bruhn JB, Dalsgaard I, Nielsen KF, Buchholtz C, Larsen JL, Gram L: Quorum sensing signal molecules (acylated homoserine lactones) in gram-negative fish pathogenic bacteria. Dis Aquat Organ. 2005, 65: 43-52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dong YH, Wang LH, Xu JL, Zhang HB, Zhang XF, Zhang LH: Quenching quorum-sensing-dependent bacterial infection by an N-acyl homoserine lactonase. Nature. 2001, 411: 813-817.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. De Keersmaecker SC, Sonck K, Vanderleyden J: Let LuxS speak up in AI-2 signaling. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14: 114-119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bertani G: Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1951, 62: 293-300.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaw PD, Ping G, Daly SL, Cha C, Cronan JE, Rinehart KLJr, Farrand SK: Detecting and characterizing N-acyl-homoserine lactone signal molecules by thin-layer chromatography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 6036-6041.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Cha C, Gao P, Chen YC, Shaw PD, Farrand SK: Production of acyl-homoserine lactone quorum-sensing signals by gram-negative plant-associated bacteria. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1998, 11: 1119-1129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Morin D, Grasland B, Vallee-Rehel K, Dufau C, Haras D: On-line high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric detection and quantification of N-acylhomoserinelactones, quorum sensing signal molecules, in the presence of biological matrices. J Chromatogr A. 2003, 1002: 79-92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose RE: The nucleotide sequence of pACYC184. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16: 355-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cols Spring Harbor, NY, 2Google Scholar
  38. De Lorenzo V, Timmis KN: Analysis and construction of stable phenotypes in Gram negative bacteria with Tn5 – and Tn10 – derived mini-transposons. Methods Enzymol. 1994, 235: 386-405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ: 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol. 1991, 173: 697-703.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Surette MG, Bassler BL: Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 7046-7050.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Corpet F: Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucl Acids Res. 1988, 16: 10881-10890.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bassler BL, Wright M, Silverman MR: Multiple signalling systems controlling expression of luminescence in Vibrio harveyi: sequence and function of genes encoding a second sensory pathway. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 13: 273-286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© García-Aljaro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us