Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Tuberculosis vaccine strain Mycobacterium bovis BCG Russia is a natural recA mutant

BMC Microbiology20088:120

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-120

©  Keller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

  • Received: 26 May 2008
  • Accepted: 17 July 2008
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The current tuberculosis vaccine is a live vaccine derived from Mycobacterium bovis and attenuated by serial in vitro passaging. All vaccine substrains in use stem from one source, strain Bacille Calmette-Guérin. However, they differ in regions of genomic deletions, antigen expression levels, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy.

Results

As a RecA phenotype increases genetic stability and may contribute restricting the ongoing evolution of the various BCG substrains while maintaining their protective efficacy, we aimed to inactivate recA by allelic replacement in BCG vaccine strains representing different phylogenetic lineages (Pasteur, Frappier, Denmark, Russia). Homologous gene replacement was achieved successfully in three out of four strains. However, only illegitimate recombination was observed in BCG substrain Russia. Sequence analyses of recA revealed that a single nucleotide insertion in the 5' part of recA led to a translational frameshift with an early stop codon making BCG Russia a natural recA mutant. At the protein level BCG Russia failed to express RecA.

Conclusion

According to phylogenetic analyses BCG Russia is an ancient vaccine strain most closely related to the parental M. bovis. We hypothesize that recA inactivation in BCG Russia occurred early and is in part responsible for its high degree of genomic stability, resulting in a substrain that has less genetic alterations than other vaccine substrains with respect to M. bovis AF2122/97 wild-type.

Keywords

  • Homologous Recombination
  • Protective Efficacy
  • Mycobacterium Bovis
  • Illegitimate Recombination
  • Tuberculosis Vaccine

Background

Tuberculosis is an infectious disease of enormous global importance. It is estimated that about one third of the human population is latently infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis with 1.6 million people dying annually from the disease [1]. The currently employed tuberculosis vaccine, Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) was originally derived from a virulent strain of M. bovis back to 1921, by repeated passages on potato slices soaked in glycerol-ox byle. The primary attenuation is attributed to loss of RD1 locus, which affects a protein secretion pathway [2–5]. Subsequent propagation of BCG in several laboratories around the world resulted in further in vitro evolution, which is still ongoing. Genetic alterations are mainly due to deletions and duplications [6], although single nucleotide polymorphisms (e.g. in mmaA3 and sigK) have also been described [7, 8]. The various genetic alterations – some presumably involving RecA-mediated recombination – affect the antigenic, protective, and metabolic properties of BCG. Thus, the term BCG does not refer to an entity but comprises a set of different substrains. Since the early sixties, freeze dried and lyophilized secondary seed lots are used as source of commercially available vaccine strains. WHO vaccine production guidelines [9] call for fresh cultures from secondary seed lots and propose not to exceed twelve passages from the primary seed lot. These recommendations have been modified recently, suggesting not to exceed four passages as phenotypic alterations were observed in vaccine batches undergoing as little as twelve subcultivations [10].

Results

Generation of recA knock-out strains

To establish BCG as a vector for stable heterologous antigen expression we intended to stabilize the genome of four BCG substrains representing different phylogenetic lineages by deletion of recA. A recA phenotype is desirable for live mycobacterial vaccines as homologous recombination is an important contributor of genomic evolution [11, 12]. We constructed a replacement vector (Additional file 1) carrying an unmarked, inactive deletion of the recA allele. In this vector, a hygromycin resistance cassette and the counterselectable marker sacB were cloned downstream of the recA allele. Transformation of this kind of vector allows generation of allelic replacement mutants by two subsequent selection steps. In a first step, transformants that have integrated the knock-out plasmid into the bacterial chromosome are selected on hygromycin B containing media. Integration of the vector by homologous recombination, i. e. 3' or 5' of the genomic recA, is revealed by Southern blot analyses. In a second step, sucrose-selection is used to select for mutants that have undergone a second intramolecular recombination resulting either in inactivation of the recA gene or in reversion to wild-type.

Most of the transformants obtained in substrains Pasteur, Frappier, and Denmark resulted from homologous integration of the targeting vector (3'or 5') at the recA locus (Table 1 and Figure 1A). Subsequent counter-selection of clones arising from homologous recombination events readily resulted in recA deletion mutants as demonstrated by Southern blot analyses. In striking contrast, all transformants (16/16 analyzed) of substrain Russia resulted from illegitimate recombination (Table 1 and Figure 1B). Southern blot analysis shows a virtually at random integration of the suicide knock-out plasmid containing the inactivated recA in substrain Russia. The presence of a 1.9-kb fragment corresponding to the original recA and the presence of a second fragment of varying size indicates non-homologous illegitimate recombination.
Table 1

Analysis of recombinants.

BCG substrain

no. of HygR colonies

no. of analyzed HygR

transformants

spontaneously HygR

   

homologous recombinants

illegitimate recombinants

 

recA+ substrains

     

   Pasteur

54

11

2

3

6

   Frappier

90

9

2

1

6

   Denmark

377

21

10

2

9

Σ recA+

521

41

14

6

21

recA- substrain

     

   Russia

72

23

0

16

7

Analysis of recombinants in BCG substrains Pasteur, Frappier, Denmark, and Russia following transformation with recA targeting plasmid pGEM7-recA::3xstop-hsp60-sacB-hyg-aph

Figure 1
Figure 1

Southern blot analysis of the recA locus. (A) BCG Frappier. Lane 1, parental M. bovis BCG Frappier; lane 2, single-crossover transformant obtained with plasmid pGEM7-recA::3xstop-hsp60-sacB-hyg-aph; lanes 3-4, recA (unmarked) knock-out mutants obtained after counterselection of a single-crossover transformant. (B) BCG Russia. Lanes 1–9 transformants obtained with plasmid pGEM7-recA::3xstop-hsp60-sacB-hyg-aph resulting from illegitimate recombination; lane 10, parental strain. (C) Schematic drawing of the BCG recA locus: the wild-type locus is shown along with the vector used for inactivation, 5' and 3' single-crossover transformant, knock-out mutant.

Genomic recA sequence

The absence of marker integration by homologous recombination prompted us to examine the genomic recA sequence in BCG Russia in comparison to the annotated sequence of BCG Pasteur 1173P2 [6]. We found a single insertional mutation 413 bp from the recA start (Figure 2), which leads to a translational frameshift and a premature stop codon at amino acid position 140 in the major central RecA domain (residues 31–269). The truncated RecA has a length of 139 instead of 790 amino acids and lacks the complete C-terminal part of the protein including loops L1 (residues 156–165) and L2 (195–210) implicated in DNA binding [13]. BCG Frappier, Denmark, and Pasteur recA were identical with the annotated reference sequence encoding a functional RecA.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Comparative alignment. Comparative alignment of DNA sequencing electropherograms for M. bovis BCG Pasteur 1173P2 and BCG Russia displaying the insertional SNP (C414) in the recA gene of BCG Russia. As a consequence Leu139 is changed to Ala, which is immediately followed by a premature stop codon (D140*). Nucleotide and amino acid numbering starts at the recA initiation codon.

RecA expression at the protein level

Bacteria respond to DNA-damage by coordinated expression of a multitude of genes involved in repair and control of cell division – the SOS response [14]. The SOS response was induced by addition of the DNA-damaging agent mitomycin C (0.2 μg mL-1) to a BCG culture, followed by incubation for an additional 24 hours [15]. Western blot analysis using a polyclonal mouse α-RecA antibody demonstrated induction of RecA in strain BCG Pasteur, but absence and failure of induction of RecA in BCG Russia (Figure 3). A genetically engineered BCG Pasteur recA mutant (this study) was used as a negative control.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Western blot analysis. Western blot analysis of cell-free protein extracts from different BCG preparations (with and without SOS response induction by mitomycin C). Mature RecA protein has an approximate molecular weight of 38 kDa. KatG (81 kDa) served as a loading control. Bands migrating around 50 kDa are unspecific.

Discussion

Replication errors, transpositions and recombination events contribute to genetic alterations and drive genome evolution. For BCG various differences in morphology, growth rate, protein expression and genetic make-up have been noted among commercially available substrains [16]. This is presumably a result of the numerous serial passages on natural (potato slices trenched in ox bile) and artificial media, which have led to the acquisition of genomic alterations and further attenuation. Of note, meta-analyses of BCG vaccination trials have indicated protective efficacies ranging from 0–80%. A correlation between the number of serial in vitro passages and the decrease in protective efficacy has been observed [17]. Several reasons have been put forward to explain the varying protective efficacies of BCG, among others genetic differences between vaccine substrains as well as within an individual substrain [18]. More recently it has been suggested that the protective efficacy of ancient vaccine strains charcterized by few regions of difference (Figure 4) may be superior to that of the later ones that are more widely used [6]. We have added the newly identified single nucleotide polymorphism to an existent phylogenetic tree. It will be of interest to see whether recA is functional in other ancient strains (e.g. BCG Moreau or Japan). Sequencing of recA may also help to clarifiy the uncertain origin of the two subcultures of BCG Japan [6].
Figure 4
Figure 4

Genealogy of BCG vaccine substrains. Genealogy of BCG vaccine substrains, modified from [6] with permission, copyright (2007) National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., displaying the original virulent ancestor strain Mycobacterium bovis (isolated by Nocard in 1908) and the subsequent series of genomic alteration including deletions of regions of difference (RD), single nucleotide polymorphisms, and duplications of genomic regions. The recA alteration (recA_D140*), the mmaA3 point mutation [8], and the 22-bp deletion in Rv3405c in BCG Japan [39] have been added to the scheme.

The RecA-family recombinases have a central role in DNA repair, restoration of stalled replication forks, induction of SOS response, mutagenesis and homologous recombination [19]. In E. coli, RecA is involved in several homologous recombination pathways, where it promotes the central steps, i.e. aligning and pairing two DNA molecules, and then promoting a strand switch followed by branch migration [19]. RecA is both ubiquitous and highly conserved among a range of organisms, but variations of the prototypic E. coli paradigm exist. recA of pathogenic mycobacteria (M. tuberculosis complex, M. leprae) but not of non-pathogenic mycobacteria (e.g. M. smegmatis) is interrupted by an in-frame open reading frame encoding an intein [20]. RecA intein is removed from the precursor RecA by an autocatalytic protein splicing reaction and active RecA, which can complement a M. smegmatis recA mutant [21, 22] is generated by ligation of amino- and carboxy terminal fragments mediated by intein. M. tuberculosis RecA activity differs from E. coli RecA activity with respect to single strand DNA-dependent ATP-hydrolysis, co-factor requirement and pH-optimum [23]. Homologous recombination in M. tuberculosis complex is sometimes masked by a high degree of illegitimate recombination in certain experiments [24]. The high degree of illegitimate recombination has been attributed to the unusual structure of recA [25]. Alternatively, the high degree of illegitimate recombination may be due to the absence of a mismatch repair system [26], which has anti-recombination activity [27]. However, homologous recombination essentially depends on recA as demonstrated in a gene conversion assay in a M. bovis BCG recA mutant [28]. Of note a homologue of E. coli RecT, a protein functionally overlapping RecA, is missing in M. tuberculosis [29]. Likewise, other recombination genes are also absent from the M. tuberculosis genome (e.g. recE, recJ) [26].

Comparative genomics indicate that recombination events are a major driving force of bacterial evolution [12]. There is extensive evidence for large-scale rearrangements, duplications and deletions resulting from homologous recombination in M. leprae [30], M. tuberculosis [31] and M. bovis BCG [6]. Half of the proteins present in the tubercle bacillus originate from gene duplications [32]. Tandem duplications are generally caused by unequal crossover between homologous sequences or by recombination of short DNA homologies. Homologous recombination between similar sequences may invert or delete genes. Several deletions in the M. tuberculosis H37Rv genome resulted from recombination between adjacent repeats of IS6110 elements [31, 33]. Sometimes, the molecular mechanisms underlying alterations at particular loci remain obscure and subsequent alterations may mask initial events, e.g. tandem duplication of the DU2 region in M. bovis BCG Pasteur arose from duplication of a 100 kb genomic segment that subsequently incurred an internal deletion of 64 kb [18].

Conclusion

Comparative genome and transcriptome analyses indicate that BCG Russia is an ancient BCG strain most closely related to the original strain attenuated by Calmette and Guérin [6]. However, a key piece of the puzzle was missing. What was the molecular mechanism underlying the high degree of genome conservation in BCG Russia? Here, analysis of the recA locus provides a possible clue. RecA, which is the key element of homologous recombination and a driving force in mycobacterial genome evolution but which is not mandatory for conferring protection of BCG in animal models of tuberculosis [11], is disrupted by single nucleotide insertion in BCG Russia. This mutation results in a frameshift and premature translational stop and most probably contributed to the genome stability of this substrain of BCG. Of note genome stability of the obligate endosymbionts of aphids, Buchnera aphidicola, is also associated with lack of recA [12].

Methods

Bacterial strains

Escherichia coli DH5α was obtained from Pharmacia (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) and was used for plasmid propagation. M. bovis BCG Pasteur 1173P2 was obtained from the strain collection of the Institute Pasteur, Paris, France (strain #CIP105050). M. bovis BCG Denmark (1331) was obtained in the form of a vaccine production lot through the Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark. M. bovis BCG Frappier (Montreal, ATCC #35735) primary lot, dated 1973, lot number 1376141, was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD, USA. The Frappier strain held by ATCC was initially transferred from the Institut Pasteur to Frappier's Institute in Montreal in 1937, was integrated in the Trudeau Mycobacterial Culture Collection and finally went to the ATCC. A vaccine production lot 547–1104 K. 1491 of M.bovis BCG Russia (corresponding to ATCC #35740) was obtained through Medgamal Inc. (TD Allergen, Moscow, Russia). This was the first documented daughter strain distributed by Institut Pasteur in 1924 [34] going directly to Russia. It is referred as an 'early strain' with regards to its genetic characteristics (regions of difference, insertional elements, antigen expression pattern).

The identity of the BCG substrains was confirmed using morphological features (roughling, generation time), PCR amplification and sequencing of described regions of difference as described by [35].

Media, transformation and DNA damage induction. The media for growing E. coli DH5α, and substrains of Mycobacterium bovis BCG have been described previously [22]. M. bovis BCG substrains were revitalised by addition of 1 mL Middlebrook 7H9 medium to a lyophilized batch. For DNA damage induction experiments M. bovis BCG was grown in Middlebrook 7H9 medium with addition of 10% (vol/vol) OADC in motionless tissue culture flasks in a 37°C incubator. Published protocols were followed for the preparation of electrocompetent cells of mycobacteria and for electroporation [22]. The recA mutants of BCG Pasteur, Denmark and Frappier were generated by allelic replacement using a suicide knock-out vector.

To induce DNA damage, mitomycin C (0.2 μg ml-1) was added to 20 mL of growing cultures (at an OD600 of 0.6) and incubated for 24 h. Thereafter, bacteria were harvested by centrifugation and prepared for cell lysis.

Construction of recA knock-out plasmid

Suicide vector pGEM7-recA::3xstop-hyg-aph was generated as follows. A 5.2-kb ApaI fragment from plasmid pEJ126 [36] containing the M. tuberculosis recA gene was subcloned into the PstI site of plasmid pBluescript-KSII(-) after blunting of both fragments with T4 DNA polymerase, resulting in plasmid pBluescript-recA. From this vector a 1.3-kb internal PstI fragment (recA bps 504–1758, corresponding to protein residues 169–586) was replaced by a 22-mer triple translation stop insert with an internal MunI restriction site and PstI overhanging ends (Additional file 1). This 22-mer was generated by annealing of dimeric oligonucleotide primers with 5'-phosphorylated ends. Briefly, two complementary 5'-phosphorylated oligonucleotides (Microsynth, Belgach, Switzerland) were mixed in annealing buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 50 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA) at equal volumes (resulting in a final concentration of 5 μM per oligonucleotide). The mixture was heated to 96°C for 5 minutes and cooled down to 25°C over a period of 8 hours. The annealing product was diluted 1:10 and used for ligation to result in plasmid pBluescript-recA::3xstop.

An hsp60-sacB construct in form of an EcoRV/BamHI fragment from plasmid pLO2 [37] was ligated to the BamHI/EcoRI site of pMV361 [38] to result in pMV361-hsp60-sacB, wherefrom an XbaI/XhoI fragment was ligated in the XbaI/SacI site of pBluescript-IIKS(-) (Strategene, La Jolla, CA, USA), to result in pBluescript-IIKS-hsp60-sacB. The later plasmid was digested with ApaI and NheI and a 2514-bp fragment ligated into pGEM7-Zf(+) (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) digested with XbaI and ApaI, thereby excising 17 bps from the multiple cloning site to result in pGEM7-hsp60-sacB (5494 bps), expressing sacB under the control of the mycobacterial hsp60 promoter. A 1.3-kbp aph cassette isolated as a PstI fragment from plasmid pUC4K (Pharmacia) was ligated into the NsiI restriction site of pGEM7-hsp60-sacB to result in pGEM7-hsp60-sacB-aph. Then we introduced a 1.3-kb hyg fragment (cut with Bpu1102I and Van91I, treated with T4 DNA polymerase to create blunt ends) encoding the hygromycin B resistance cassette into pGEM7-hsp60-sacB-aph (cut with SacI and treated with T4 DNA polymerase). The resulting plasmid pGEM7-hsp60-sacB-aph-hyg was cut with EcoRV and SpeI. We subsequently introduced a 4-kb recA::3xstop fragment from pBluescript-recA::3xstop (cut with EcoRV and SpeI), the resulting suicide vector pGEM7-recA::3xstop-hsp60-sacB-hyg-aph was used for transformation of BCG strains.

DNA isolation, sequencing and alignment

DNA was extracted from BCG colonies grown on 7H10. The recA gene was amplified from genomic DNA (10 ng) by Pfu DNA polymerase using primers #1 and #2. The product was cleaned via gel purification and sequenced using primers #1 to #9 (Additional file 2) using an ABI PRISM 310 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Forster City, CA, USA). The sequences were aligned using Lasergene (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA) SeqMan (version 6). The aligned sequence was compared via BLAST software to the recA sequence of M. bovis BCG substrain Pasteur 1173P2 [6]. Standard techniques were applied for Southern blot analysis. Approximately 500 ng of genomic DNA was digested with SmaI and hybridized to a recA probe.

Preparation of cell-free extracts

Untreated and mitomycin-C-treated bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, washed with PBS buffer (pH 7.2) and resuspended in 300 μL PBS containing 0.5% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Bacteria were lysed in screw-cap tubes in a water immersion (ice-chilled) sonicator (Elma, Singen, Germany), using maximum duty-cycle during 1 h 20 min with a cooling interval every 20 min. The crude lysate was clarified by spinning at 1 000 × g during 10 min.

Western blotting

Cell-free extracts corresponding to 50 μg total protein (quantification via Bradford assay) were used for Western blot analyses. Following SDS-PAGE in a 13.3% polyacrylamide gel, proteins were blotted to a PVDF membrane using a semi-dry blotter (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) at constant current (0.3 A) for 30 min. Equal loading of proteins was confirmed by Coomassie staining, and by blotting with antibodies against the constitutively expressed mycobacterial protein KatG using a polyclonal mouse α-KatG antibody (1:2500). Detection of RecA was carried out using a polyclonal mouse α-RecA antibody (1:1000). Secondary antibody was HRP-conjugated goat α-mouse antibody (1:2500).

Accession number

DNA sequence of M. bovis BCG substrain Russia recA has been deposited with GenBank data base under accession EU442641.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the University of Zurich, the Niedersächsischer Verein zur Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose Lungen- und Bronchialerkrankungen e. V., and Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant 3100A0_120326).

The M. bovis BCG Russia was a gift from Medgamal (TD Allergen, Moscow, Russia). The company had no influence in study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the paper; and decision to submit it for publication.

Publication notice

A preliminary, non peer-reviewed version appeared online on the Nature Precedings pre-publication server.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Elaine O. Davis and to Stewart T. Cole for providing RecA and KatG antibodies; to Anatoly A. Kotlobay for the free vial of BCG Russia, to Brigitte Berger-Bächi and all members of our laboratory for helpful discussions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
(2)
Nationales Zentrum für Mykobakterien, Zürich, Switzerland

References

  1. WHO: Fact sheet N°104: Tuberculosis. 2007, WHO Media Centre. Geneva: WHO, 1.Google Scholar
  2. Brodin P, Majlessi L, Marsollier L, de Jonge MI, Bottai D, Demangel C, Hinds J, Neyrolles O, Butcher PD, Leclerc C, Cole ST, Brosch R: Dissection of ESAT-6 system 1 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and impact on immunogenicity and virulence. Infect Immun. 2006, 74 (1): 88-98. 10.1128/IAI.74.1.88-98.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hsu T, Hingley-Wilson SM, Chen B, Chen M, Dai AZ, Morin PM, Marks CB, Padiyar J, Goulding C, Gingery M, Eisenberg D, Russell RG, Derrick SC, Collins FM, Morris SL, King CH, Jacobs WR: The primary mechanism of attenuation of bacillus Calmette-Guerin is a loss of secreted lytic function required for invasion of lung interstitial tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100 (21): 12420-12425. 10.1073/pnas.1635213100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lewis KN, Liao R, Guinn KM, Hickey MJ, Smith S, Behr MA, Sherman DR: Deletion of RD1 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis mimics bacille Calmette-Guerin attenuation. J Infect Dis. 2003, 187 (1): 117-123. 10.1086/345862.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mahairas GG, Sabo PJ, Hickey MJ, Singh DC, Stover CK: Molecular analysis of genetic differences between Mycobacterium bovis BCG and virulent M. bovis. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178 (5): 1274-1282.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brosch R, Gordon SV, Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Frigui W, Valenti P, Dos Santos S, Duthoy S, Lacroix C, Garcia-Pelayo C, Inwald JK, Golby P, Garcia JN, Hewinson RG, Behr MA, Quail MA, Churcher C, Barrell BG, Parkhill J, Cole ST: Genome plasticity of BCG and impact on vaccine efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104 (13): 5596-5601. 10.1073/pnas.0700869104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlet D, Mostowy S, Alexander D, Sit L, Wiker HG, Behr MA: Reduced expression of antigenic proteins MPB70 and MPB83 in Mycobacterium bovis BCG strains due to a start codon mutation in sigK. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 56 (5): 1302-1313. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04618.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Behr MA, Schroeder BG, Brinkman JN, Slayden RA, Barry CE: A point mutation in the mma3 gene is responsible for impaired methoxymycolic acid production in Mycobacterium bovis BCG strains obtained after 1927. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182 (12): 3394-3399. 10.1128/JB.182.12.3394-3399.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. WHO, Expert Committee on Biological Standardization: Requirements for dried BCG Vaccine. World Health Organisation Technical Report Series. 1985, 745: 60-92.Google Scholar
  10. Ho M, Corbel M, Knezevic I, Roumiantzeff M: Report on a WHO consultation on the characterisation of BCG vaccines, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland 8–9 Dec 2004. Vaccine. 2005, 23 (50): 5700-5704. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.048.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sander P, Bottger EC, Springer B, Steinmann B, Rezwan M, Stavropoulos E, Joseph Colston M: A recA deletion mutant of Mycobacterium bovis BCG confers protection equivalent to that of wild-type BCG but shows increased genetic stability. Vaccine. 2003, 21 (27–30): 4124-4127. 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00434-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tamas I, Klasson L, Canback B, Naslund AK, Eriksson AS, Wernegreen JJ, Sandstrom JP, Moran NA, Andersson SG: 50 million years of genomic stasis in endosymbiotic bacteria. Science. 2002, 296 (5577): 2376-2379. 10.1126/science.1071278.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Datta S, Prabu MM, Vaze MB, Ganesh N, Chandra NR, Muniyappa K, Vijayan M: Crystal structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecA and its complex with ADP-AlF(4). Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (24): 4964-4973. 10.1093/nar/28.24.4964.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox MM: Regulation of bacterial RecA protein function. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2007, 42 (1): 41-63. 10.1080/10409230701260258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Papavinasasundaram KG, Anderson C, Brooks PC, Thomas NA, Movahedzadeh F, Jenner PJ, Colston MJ, Davis EO: Slow induction of RecA by DNA damage in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiology. 2001, 147 (Pt 12): 3271-3279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Behr MA: BCG – different strains, different vaccines?. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002, 2 (2): 86-92. 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00182-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Behr MA, Small PM: Has BCG attenuated to impotence?. Nature. 1997, 389 (6647): 133-134. 10.1038/38151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Brosch R, Gordon SV, Buchrieser C, Pym AS, Garnier T, Cole ST: Comparative genomics uncovers large tandem chromosomal duplications in Mycobacterium bovis BCG Pasteur. Yeast. 2000, 17 (2): 111-123. 10.1002/1097-0061(20000630)17:2<111::AID-YEA17>3.0.CO;2-G.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cox MM: Motoring along with the bacterial RecA protein. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 8 (2): 127-138. 10.1038/nrm2099.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis EO, Thangaraj HS, Brooks PC, Colston MJ: Evidence of selection for protein introns in the recAs of pathogenic mycobacteria. EMBO J. 1994, 13 (3): 699-703.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Frischkorn K, Springer B, Bottger EC, Davis EO, Colston MJ, Sander P: In vivo splicing and functional characterization of Mycobacterium leprae RecA. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182 (12): 3590-3592. 10.1128/JB.182.12.3590-3592.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Frischkorn K, Sander P, Scholz M, Teschner K, Prammananan T, Bottger EC: Investigation of mycobacterial recA function: protein introns in the RecA of pathogenic mycobacteria do not affect competency for homologous recombination. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 29 (5): 1203-1214. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01003.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Muniyappa K, Ganesh N, Guhan N, Singh P, Manjunath GP, Datta S, Chandra NR, Vujayan M: Homologous recombination in mycobacteria. Current Science. 2004, 86: 141-148.Google Scholar
  24. Kalpana GV, Bloom BR, Jacobs WR: Insertional mutagenesis and illegitimate recombination in mycobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88 (12): 5433-5437. 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5433.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McFadden J: Recombination in mycobacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 21 (2): 205-211. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.6271345.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mizrahi V, Andersen SJ: DNA repair in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. What have we learnt from the genome sequence?. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 29 (6): 1331-1339. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01038.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nilsson AI, Koskiniemi S, Eriksson S, Kugelberg E, Hinton JC, Andersson DI: Bacterial genome size reduction by experimental evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102 (34): 12112-12116. 10.1073/pnas.0503654102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sander P, Papavinasasundaram KG, Dick T, Stavropoulos E, Ellrott K, Springer B, Colston MJ, Bottger EC: Mycobacterium bovis BCG recA deletion mutant shows increased susceptibility to DNA-damaging agents but wild-type survival in a mouse infection model. Infect Immun. 2001, 69 (6): 3562-3568. 10.1128/IAI.69.6.3562-3568.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Noirot P, Gupta RC, Radding CM, Kolodner RD: Hallmarks of homology recognition by RecA-like recombinases are exhibited by the unrelated Escherichia coli RecT protein. EMBO J. 2003, 22 (2): 324-334. 10.1093/emboj/cdg027.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Cole ST, Eiglmeier K, Parkhill J, James KD, Thomson NR, Wheeler PR, Honore N, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, Mungall K, Basham D, Brown D, Chillingworth T, Connor R, Davies RM, Devlin K, Duthoy S, Feltwell T, Fraser A, Hamlin N, Holroyd S, Hornsby T, Jagels K, Lacroix C, Maclean J, Moule S, Murphy L, Oliver K, Quail MA, Rajandream MA, Rutherford KM, Rutter S, Seeger K, Simon S, Simmonds M, Skelton J, Squares R, Squares S, Stevens K, Taylor K, Whitehead S, Woodward JR, Barrell BG: Massive gene decay in the leprosy bacillus. Nature. 2001, 409 (6823): 1007-1011. 10.1038/35059006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ho TB, Robertson BD, Taylor GM, Shaw RJ, Young DB: Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genomes reveals frequent deletions in a 20 kb variable region in clinical isolates. Yeast. 2000, 17 (4): 272-282. 10.1002/1097-0061(200012)17:4<272::AID-YEA48>3.0.CO;2-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, Gordon SV, Eiglmeier K, Gas S, Barry CE, Tekaia F, Badcock K, Basham D, Brown D, Chillingworth T, Connor R, Davies R, Devlin K, Feltwell T, Gentles S, Hamlin N, Holroyd S, Hornsby T, Jagels K, Krogh A, McLean J, Moule S, Murphy L, Oliver K, Osborne J, Quail MA, Rajandream MA, Rogers J, Rutter S, Seeger K, Skelton J, Squares R, Squares S, Sulston JE, Taylor K, Whitehead S, Barrell BG: Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature. 1998, 393 (6685): 537-544. 10.1038/31159.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gordon SV, Eiglmeier K, Garnier T, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Barrell B, Cole ST, Hewinson RG: Genomics of Mycobacterium bovis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2001, 81 (1–2): 157-163. 10.1054/tube.2000.0269.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Dubos RJ, Pierce CH, Schaefer WB: Differential characteristics in vitro and in vivo of several substrains of BCG. III. Multiplication and survival in vivo. Am Rev Tuberc. 1956, 74 (5): 683-698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mostowy S, Tsolaki AG, Small PM, Behr MA: The in vitro evolution of BCG vaccines. Vaccine. 2003, 21 (27–30): 4270-4274. 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00484-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Davis EO, Jenner PJ, Brooks PC, Colston MJ, Sedgwick SG: Protein splicing in the maturation of M. tuberculosis recA protein: a mechanism for tolerating a novel class of intervening sequence. Cell. 1992, 71 (2): 201-210. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90349-H.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lenz O, Schwartz E, Dernedde J, Eitinger M, Friedrich B: The Alcaligenes eutrophus H16 hoxX gene participates in hydrogenase regulation. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176 (14): 4385-4393.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Stover CK, de la Cruz VF, Fuerst TR, Burlein JE, Benson LA, Bennett LT, Bansal GP, Young JF, Lee MH, Hatfull GF, Snapper SB, Barletta RG, Jacobs WR, Bloom BR: New use of BCG for recombinant vaccines. Nature. 1991, 351 (6326): 456-460. 10.1038/351456a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bedwell J, Kairo SK, Behr MA, Bygraves JA: Identification of substrains of BCG vaccine using multiplex PCR. Vaccine. 2001, 19 (15–16): 2146-2151. 10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00369-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Keller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us