- Research article
- Open Access
Effective prophylaxis against rotavirus diarrhea using a combination of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and antibodies
© Pant et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 13 February 2007
- Accepted: 27 September 2007
- Published: 27 September 2007
Rotavirus is a worldwide cause of infectious infantile diarrhea that claims over 600,000 lives annually. Recently, two new vaccine candidates have been developed but their efficacy in developing countries, still remains to be proven. Oral delivery of specific immunoglobulins provides passive immunity and is a fast acting treatment for rotavirus diarrhea. Probiotic bacteria have also gained considerable attention lately as treatment for rotavirus diarrhea. Here we report an evaluation of the therapeutic potential of different probiotics and their combination with anti – rotavirus antibodies in a mouse model of rotavirus diarrhea.
Of the six probiotic bacteria tested, Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG had the strongest influence in reducing prevalence, duration and severity of diarrhea and was therefore chosen for combination treatment with immunoglobulins. The combination treatment reduced the diarrhea outcome measures significantly, prevented histopathological changes and reduced the virus load in the intestines.
The advantages associated with immunoglobulins and probiotics based therapy is that the treatment provides a rapid therapeutic effect and is cost efficient. These components do not require special storage conditions and could potentially complement the rehydration therapy that is currently used.
- Probiotic Bacterium
- Oral Rehydration Therapy
- Diarrhea Prevalence
- Focus Form Unit
Diarrheal diseases remains a major global threat to child survival , and rotavirus is the predominant agent of severe, dehydrating gastroenteritis in infants and young children in both developing and industrialized countries [2, 3]. In the Western world, it accounts for a major economical loss with a yearly cost of over $ 1 billion in the management of rotavirus infection in the US alone . The recent development of two new rotavirus vaccines offers hope but even if an effective vaccine becomes available, its use may be limited by financial constraints in developing countries. Moreover, its efficacy in children with malnutrition and associated immunodeficiency is questionable. In the absence of an ideal and affordable specific treatment, Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT) has served as a useful treatment that may be rapidly distributed, does not require specific storage conditions and is inexpensive. However, even after achieving a substantial reduction in mortality from dehydration, ORT has little or no effect on the course of diarrhea or its associated nutritional morbidity.
The role of secretory IgA, in serving as the first line of defense against many mucosal pathogens is well established. In the case of rotavirus, protection from disease appears to rely mainly on the production of neutralizing antibodies against the outer capsid proteins VP4 and VP7. As a corollary to this, oral delivery of specific antibodies protects against severe rotavirus diarrhea both in laboratory and clinical settings . We have previously demonstrated that purified antibodies from hyperimmune bovine colostrum and egg yolk from appropriately immunized hens are effective in the treatment of diarrhea in rotavirus-infected children [7, 8]. However, mass prophylaxis with HBC has logistic and economic limitations, particularly in developing countries.
In the last few decades, the use of probiotic bacteria has gained considerable attention as a safe and accessible form of treatment for gastrointestinal diseases [9, 10]. Bacteria that have been employed for intervention of diarrhea of viral or bacterial origin belong to the Lactobacillus or the Bifidobacterium genus . The therapeutic capacity of certain probiotic bacteria against rotavirus gastroenteritis has been suggested to be due to their ability to stabilize and reinforce the mucosal barrier , production of antimicrobial substances  and stimulation of the local antigen specific and nonspecific immune responses [14, 12]. Significant differences have also been noted with regard to the efficaciousness and mode of action of different strains.
The purpose of our study was to evaluate a combination therapy with immunoglobulins and probiotics as a prophylaxis against rotavirus infection in a mouse model.
Reactivity of HBC preparation with RRV
In-vitro neutralization test
Since the preparation of the anti-rotavirus HBC used has had a shelf life of nearly 20 years, it was important to evaluate its neutralization capacity against RRV, our challenge pathogen. MA104 cells grown to confluency were thus challenged with a fixed amount of RRV (200 FFU) after the virus had been preincubated anti-rotavirus HBC. Even a low amount (7 ng total protein of anti-rotavirus HBC corresponding to 2.5 ng total immunoglobulins) afforded 100% protection of the challenged cells (data not shown).
Evaluation of immunoglobulin and probiotic combinations on rotavirus diarrhea
Duration and severity of diarrhea in different treatment groups with or without complementation with anti-rotavirus HBC
Number of animals
Duration (mean ± SE)*
Severity (mean ± SE)
1.85 ± 0.17
3.00 ± 0.33
100 μg HBC
0.42 ± 0.23***
0.42 ± 0.23 ***
10 μg HBC
1.62 ± 0.32
2.62 ± 0.53
L. paracasei b
1.60 ± 0.27
L. paracaseib + 10 μg HBC
0.78 ± 0.28 *
L. reuteri SD 2112
1.20 ± 0.20
2.00 ± 0.47
L. reuteri SD 2112 + 10 μg HBC
1.20 ± 0.20
2.00 ± 0.47
L. paracasei NCC 2461
1.80 ± 0.29
2.50 ± 0.40
L. paracasei NCC 2461+ 10 μg HBC
2.14 ± 0.26
3.43 ± 0.53
L. rhamnosus GG
0.90 ± 0.23
1.20 ± 0.32*
L. rhamnosus GG + 10 μg HBC
0.62 ± 0.32*
0.87 ± 0.48 *
Outcome measures of diarrhea among mice receiving different probiotic bacteria and challenged with RRV
Number of animals
Highest Prevalence (%)
Duration (mean ± SE)
Severity (mean ± SE)
L. paracasei b
1.94 ± 0.20
2.88 ± 0.35
L. reuteri SD2112 (ATCC 55730)
1.40 ± 0.30
2.00 ± 0.47
L. rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103)
0.65 ± 0.15***
0.85 ± 0.19***
Heat killed L. rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103)
1.63 ± 0.32
2.37 ± 0.53
L. paracasei NCC 2461 (ST11)
1.60 ± 0.26
2.50 ± 0.40
L. johnsonii NCC 533 (La-1)
1.87 ± 0.12
2.75 ± 0.25
S. thermophilus NCC 2496
1.50 ± 0.16
2.70 ± 0.39
Infected and untreated
1.81 ± 0.17
2.96 ± 0.32
Real Time PCR
One of the advantages of using immunoglobulin-based treatments against rotavirus-induced diarrhea is the immediacy of action, which the conventional active immunization regimens lack. We have previously reported that severe rotavirus diarrhea in children can be successfully treated using antibodies derived from colostrum of immunized cows (HBC antibodies) [7, 18, 19]. Our preliminary results from this study establishes that these antibodies have been well preserved even after a long shelf life (18 years) and are fully functional in imparting protection against rotavirus infection in vitro and in vivo. However, treatment for rotavirus diarrhea purely based on HBC, however effective, is not practical and may be offset by the costs involved for mass prophylaxis. It is thus imperative to find alternative methods to make immunoglobulin based therapy economically viable.
Probiotic bacteria offer a cheaper platform for the management of rotavirus diarrhea. Among the various mechanisms suggested for the action of probiotics is the ability to survive gut transit and in the process cause stabilization of the mucosal barrier, production of anti-microbial compounds and stimulation of the mucosal immune response leading to an increase in secretory IgA . It is, however, difficult to determine whether the health promoting effects of the probiotic bacteria are due to a specific inhibition of the pathogen in question or a reflection of a more complex interaction between host, pathogen and the probiotic.
We tested six different lactobacilli for protection against rotavirus-induced diarrhea. Mouse pups received two prophylactic doses of bacteria before challenge with rotavirus, followed by daily therapeutic administration of respective bacteria and monitoring for diarrhea symptoms. We noted a strong anti-rotavirus activity of L. rhamnosus strain GG, corroborating results obtained previously by other researchers in clinical trials [20, 21]. However, the same bacterium, when heat killed, was unable to impart protection against rotavirus challenge, suggesting that the inhibitory effect against rotavirus is either dependent on viability or is a heat labile factor. Interestingly a clinical evaluation of treatment with live or heat inactivated L. rhamnosus GG against rotavirus diarrhea found that the inactivated bacteria did not effectively stimulate local IgA production, thus increasing the chances of reinfection . L. reuteri SD2112, which has previously shown a positive effect in the treatment of rotavirus-related diarrhea in clinical trials , was only marginally protective in our mouse model and L. paracasei NCC 2461, which was recently shown to have no significant effect in resolving rotavirus-induced gastroenteritis , was not protective at all in our animal model. Thus, it appears that the basic mechanism of probiotics, at least in relation to rotavirus infection, may be paralleled in the mouse gastro-intestinal tract as in the humans and the mouse model may thus potentially serve as a premonitory assessment of the therapeutic effect of candidate probiotics against rotavirus.
In order to introduce specificity to the basic probiotic therapy, we complemented bacteria with a low dose of polyclonal anti – rotavirus antibodies. Four lactobacilli with wide ranging anti-rotavirus properties were administered in combination with antibodies. Combination treatment of L. rhamnosus GG and antibodies was the most potent among all the combinations. Not only did this combination reduce the outcome measures of diarrhea, which was also partially achieved by feeding of L. rhamnosus GG alone, but also alleviated histopathology and reduced the virus load in the small intestine. The role of secretory IgA and passively administered antibodies as the primary protection against many invading mucosal pathogen including rotavirus is an established tenet. In fact, the probiotic activity of L. rhamnosus GG with respect to rotavirus infection has been linked to an increased rate of production of IgA in the mucosa . We also attempted to study the possible contribution of L. rhamnosus GG in stimulating IgA responses in the gastrointestinal mucosa of the pups through ELISA. However, such an analysis is technically difficult, due to the high background by maternally derived IgA through milk. We hypothesize that by administering antibodies and L. rhamnosus GG together, we have achieved a combination where the infection is effectively controlled by the two components. The small amount of administered antibodies blunts the initial infection, but is clearly not enough to abrogate it. The co-administered L. rhamnosus GG may potentially boost this protection owing to its ability to muster a local IgA response.
To this end, it is reasonable to assume that the cornerstone in achieving protection against rotavirus infection could be to optimize delivery of functional antibodies to the intestinal mucosa. Genetically engineering lactobacilli for in-situ expression of antibody fragments could achieve this objective [16, 24]. Multiple antibody specificities can be expressed by the lactobacilli that can mimic a polyvalent antibody preparation. The expression of various antibody fragments on lactobacillus surface would increase the avidity for binding several fold. Additionally, the probiotic activity associated with the carrier lactobacilli would be an added advantage. We are thus currently developing lactobacilli that express anti-rotavirus antibody fragments on the bacterial surface.
Problems such as high production costs, special storage conditions, difficulties in distribution to the affected population and the need of technical expertise for vaccine delivery constitute potential drawbacks of active immunization. Furthermore, efficacy of the newly licensed vaccines in the affected population and the recommended use only in children younger than 3 months are issues that need to be addressed. As a principle, inducing a protective response by vaccination would take longer than the time between exposure to rotavirus and the onset of disease. Passive immunization with protective antibodies is the only currently available intervention that provides immediate protection in persons with impaired immunity. Freeze-dried immunoglobulins and probiotics could also be used as a prophylactic measure when a seasonal dependent rotavirus outbreak in suspected. Although the current treatment was administered as a prophylaxis in this study, both L. rhamnosus GG and oral immunoglobulin therapy have been previously shown to have therapeutic effect against rotavirus diarrhea in children [20, 21, 7]. A combination based on these two components may therefore also have therapeutic efficacy but this hypothesis needs further testing. Freeze-dried immunoglobulins and probiotics could be used to complement the standard oral rehydration therapy and may help to relieve the immense disease burden posed by rotavirus in the developing world.
A combination of L. rhamnosus GG with specific bovine colostrum – derived immunoglobulins is an effective prophylactic measure for rotavirus diarrhea in the infant mouse model. This can be a highly cost efficient way of managing rotavirus diarrhea and may thus represent the prophylaxis of choice for selected group of children.
Anti – rotavirus antibodies
The Hyperimmune Bovine Colostrum (HBC) used was produced by vaccination of pregnant cows in a Swiss dairy farm with human strains of rotavirus, i.e. Wa, RV3, RV5 and ST3, representing serotypes 1 to 4. The preparation and the antiviral activity of the HBC concentrate is described in detail elsewhere . In brief, the concentrate was prepared from colostrums by skimming, pasteurization and removal of milk fat, casein, lactose and mineral salts. The product was then sterile filtered, and the resulting whey protein solution was freeze-dried. The immunoglobulin concentration of the powder was 36 g/100 g of dried anti-rotavirus milk concentrate. The compositions of the immunoglobulin were 75% IgG1, 3% IgG2, 17% IgA and 6% IgM. The neutralization titers as measured in type neutralization test against the serotype were as follows: serotype 1, 7500; serotype 2, 2000; serotype 3, 4500; and serotype 4, 4500 . The negative control was prepared from milk from nonimmunized cows (Imulin®; New Zealand Dairy Board, Wellington, New Zealand) (22% lactose). Both the HBC and placebo were stored at room temperature.
Rhesus rotavirus (RRV) was cultured in MA104 cells as previously described. The virus titre was calculated using immunoperoxidase staining of infected cells . A single batch of the RRV was used for the study.
Reactivity of HBC against RRV (ELISA)
ELISA 96 well plates were coated with rabbit anti-human rotavirus anti-serum (1:1000) at 4°C overnight. After two washes with PBS, diluted RRV was added (1:100) and left for binding overnight at 4°C. The plates were then blocked with PBS-BSA (2%) for 2 h and subsequently, HBC was added in two-fold dilutions prepared in PBS and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. After washing, alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-bovine IgG was added (1:1000) (Zymed, San Francisco, USA) and the plate was incubated for another 1 h at 37°C. The reaction was developed with p-nitrophenyl phosphate in diaethanolamine buffer and the plate was read at 405 nm.
HBC was serially diluted four-fold in Dulbecco's PBS and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with 200 foci forming units (FFU) of trypsin-activated RRV in a final volume of 200 μl. Confluent MA104 cell monolayers were then inoculated with the mixture. The inoculated plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 h, washed with MEM medium, supplied with fresh MEM medium supplemented with antibiotics (gentamycin, penicillin and streptomycin) and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 18 h. Monolayers were fixed and stained with immunoperoxidase as previously described . A reduction in the number of RRV-infected cells greater than 60% with respect to the number in control wells was considered to indicate neutralization .
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
Four different Lactic acid bacteria were obtained from Nestec, Nestlé, Lausanne, L. paracasei strain NCC 2461 (ST11), L. rhamnosus strain GG (ATCC 53103), L. johnsonii strain NCC 533 (La-1) , L. rhamnosus strain NCC 596 and Streptococcus thermophilus strain NCC 2496. The L. reuteri strain ATCC 55730 (SD2112) was obtained from Biogaia, Sweden. L. paracasei  (previously named L. casei 393 pLZ15-)  was obtained from Peter Pouwels (TNO Institute, the Netherlands). Lactobacilli were reconstituted and cultured in MRS broth (Difco, Sparks, MD, USA) in standing aerobiosis conditions at 37°C. S. thermophilus strain NCC 2496 was cultured in M17 media with lactose supplementation in standing aerobiosis at 42°C.
All animal experiments were approved by the local ethical committee of the Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital in Huddinge. Pregnant BALB/c mice were purchased from Møllegard, Denmark. Four-day-old pups were used for the study. Different bacteria or antibody preparations were administered to pups once daily in a 10 μl volume starting on day -1 and continued until day 3. Infections were made orally on day 0 using 2 × 107 FFU RRV in a 10 μl volume. Immunoglobulins and freshly cultured bacteria were resuspended in PBS at the desired concentrations. Occurrence of diarrhea was recorded daily until day 4. Pups were euthanized using intra-peritoneal pentobarbital on day 4. Sections of small intestines were stabilized in RNAlater® (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for RNA isolation or fixed in neutral buffered formalin for histopathological analysis.
Sections of small intestine were excised and perfused with formalin. The sections were kept immersed in formalin for a day after which they were transferred to 70% ethanol. The samples were embedded in paraffin and sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin using standard protocols. The sections were analyzed blindly for signs of rotavirus infection associated pathology .
Real time PCR
Total cellular RNA was isolated from small intestinal tissue and used for real-time PCR analysis after digestion of residual genomic DNA using RNase free DNase® (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). EZ RT-PCR® core reagent kit (PE Applied Biosystems) was used for real- time PCR quantification of rotavirus vp7 RNA as described before . The RNA samples from each animal were normalized for the internal housekeeping gene GAPDH . Detection of no virus or less than 10 virus vp7 RNA copies by PCR was defined as clearance from infection.
Diarrhea in the pups was assessed on the basis of consistency of feces. Watery diarrhea was given a score of 2 and loose stool was given a score of 1, no stool or normal stool was given a score of 0. Presence or absence of diarrhea was compared among treatment groups in a day-wise manner by Fischer's exact test and was presented as percentage diarrhea in graphs. Severity was defined as the sum of diarrhea scores for each pup during the course of the experiment (severity = Σ diarrhea score (day 1 + day 2 + day 3 + day 4)) and duration was defined as the total sum of days with diarrhea. Both severity and duration were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests. Differences in the intestinal virus load as assessed by real-time PCR were tested using the Mann-Whitney test.
We thank Björn Rozell for conducting histopathological analysis on the intestinal sections. Thanks to Anna Hultberg for assistance in in-vivo sample collection. This work was supported by Nestlé Research Center (NRC), Lausanne, Switzerland. NP was supported by NRC, Lausanne, HM was supported by BIODEFENCE project (EU) and the Ruth and Richard Julin Foundation, LS was supported by Swedish Research Council (VR), LH was supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR).
- Bryce J, Boschi-Pinto C, Shibuya K, Black RE, WHO Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group: WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet. 2005, 365: 1147-1152. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71877-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cook SM, Glass RI, LeBaron CW, Ho MS: Global seasonality of rotavirus infections. Bull WHO. 1990, 68: 171-177.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parashar UD, Hummelman EG, Bresee JS, Miller MA, Glass RI: Global illness and deaths caused by rotavirus disease in children. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9: 565-572.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zimmerman CM, Bresee JS, Parashar UD, Riggs TL, Holman RC, Glass RI: Cost of diarrhea-associated hospitalizations and outpatient visits in an insured population of young children in the United States. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001, 20: 14-19. 10.1097/00006454-200101000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruggeri FM, Johansen K, Basile G, Kraehenbuhl JP, Svensson L: Antirotavirus Immunoglobulin A neutralizes virus in vitro after transcytosis through epithelial cells and protects infant mice from diarrhea. J Virol. 1998, 72: 2708-2714.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hammarström L: Passive immunity against rotavirus in infants. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1999, 88 (430): 127-132. 10.1080/080352599750029844.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarker SA, Casswall TH, Mahalanabis D, Alam NH, Albert MJ, Brussow H, Fuchs GJ, Hammarström L: Successful treatment of rotavirus diarrhea in children with immunoglobulin from immunized bovine colostrum. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998, 17: 1149-1154. 10.1097/00006454-199812000-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarker SA, Casswall TH, Juneja LR, Hoq E, Hossain I, Fuchs GJ, Hammarström L: Randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of hyperimmunized chicken egg yolk immunoglobulin in children with rotavirus diarrhea. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001, 32: 19-25. 10.1097/00005176-200101000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Isolauri E, Kaila M, Mykkanen H, Ling WH, Salminen S: Oral bacteriotherapy for viral gastroenteritis. Dig Dis Sci. 1994, 39: 2595-2600. 10.1007/BF02087695.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bibiloni R, Fedorak RN, Tannock GW, Madsen KL, Gionchetti P, Campieri M, De Simone C, Sartor RB: VSL#3 Probiotic-Mixture Induces Remission in Patients with Active Ulcerative Colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005, 100: 1539-1546. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41794.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allen SJ, Okoko B, Martinez E, Gregorio G, Dans LF: Probiotics for treating infectious diarrhea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004, 2: CD003048-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schiffrin EJ, Blum S: Interactions between the microbiota and the intestinal mucosa. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002, 56 (Suppl 3): S60-S64. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601489.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gänzle MG, Höltzel A, Walter J, Jung G, Hammes WP: Characterization of Reutericyclin produced by Lactobacillus reuteri LTH2584. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000, 66 (10): 4325-4333. 10.1128/AEM.66.10.4325-4333.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaila M, Isolauri E, Saxelin M, Arvilommi H, Vesikari T: Viable versus inactivated lactobacillus strain GG in acute rotavirus diarrhea. Arch Dis Child. 1995, 72 (1): 51-53.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Acedo-Félix E, Pérez-Martínez G: Significant differences between Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei T and a commonly used plasmid-cured derivative revealed by a polyphasic study. Int J System Evol Microbiol. 2003, 53: 67-75. 10.1099/ijs.0.02325-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pant N, Hultberg A, Zhao Y, Svensson L, Hammarström QP, Johansen K, Pouwels PH, Ruggeri FM, Hermans P, Frenken L, Borén T, Marcotte H, Hammarström L: Lactobacilli expressing VHH antibody fragments from llama (lactobodies) confer protection against rotavirus induced diarrhea. J Infect Dis. 2006, 194: 1580-1588. 10.1086/508747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boshuizen JA, Reimerink JH, Korteland-van Male AM, van Ham VJ, Koopmans MP, Buller HA, Dekker J, Einerhand AW: Changes in small intestinal homeostasis, morphology, and gene expression during rotavirus infection of infant mice. J Virol. 2003, 77: 13005-13016. 10.1128/JVI.77.24.13005-13016.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hilpert H, Brüssow H, Mietens C, Sidoti J, Lerner L, Werchau H: Use of bovine milk concentrate containing antibody to rotavirus to treat rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants. J Infect Dis. 1987, 156 (1): 158-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brüssow H, Hilpert H, Walther I, Sidoti J, Mietens C, Bachmann P: Bovine milk immunoglobulins for passive immunity to infantile rotavirus gastroenteritis. J Clin Microbiol. 1987, 25 (6): 982-986.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szajewska H, Skorka A, Ruszczynski M, Gieruszczak-Bialek D: Meta-analysis: Lactobacillus GG for treating acute diarrhea in children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007, 25 (8): 871-881.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guandalini S, Pensabene L, Abu Zikri M, Amil Dias J, Casali LG, Hoekstra H, Kolacek S, Massar K, Micetic-Turk D, Papadopoulou A, Salazar de Sousa J, Sandhu B, Szajewska H, Weizman Z: Lactobacillus GG administered in oral rehydration solution to children with acute diarrhea: a multicenter European trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000, 30: 54-60. 10.1097/00005176-200005000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shornikova AV, Casas IA, Mykkanen H, Salo E, Vesikari T: Bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus reuteri in rotavirus gastroenteritis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997, 16 (12): 1103-1137. 10.1097/00006454-199712000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarker SA, Sultana S, Fuchs GW, Alam NH, Azim T, Brüssow H, Hammarström L: Lactobacillus paracasei strain ST11 has no effect on rotavirus but ameliorates the outcome of nonrotavirus diarrhea in children from Bangladesh. Pediatrics. 2005, 116 (2): e221-228. 10.1542/peds.2004-2334.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kruger C, Hu Y, Pan Q, Marcotte H, Hultberg A, Delwar D, van Dalen PJ, Pouwels PH, Leer RJ, Kelly CG, van Dollenweerd C, Ma JK, Hammarstrom L: In situ delivery of passive immunity by lactobacilli producing single-chain antibodies. Nat Biotechnol. 2002, 20 (7): 702-706. 10.1038/nbt0702-702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Svensson L, Finlay BB, Bass D, von Bonsdorff CH, Greenberg HB: Symmetric infection of rotavirus on polarized human intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) cells. J Virol. 1991, 65: 4190-4197.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pridmore RD, Berger B, Desiere F, Vilanova D, Barretto C, Pittet AC, Zwahlen MC, Rouvet M, Altermann E, Barrangou R, Mollet B, Mercenier A, Klaenhammer T, Arigoni F, Schell MA: The genome sequence of the probiotic intestinal bacterium Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 2512-2517. 10.1073/pnas.0307327101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Overbergh L, Valckx D, Waer M, Mathieu C: Quantification of murine cytokine mRNAs using real time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. Cytokine. 1999, 11: 305-312. 10.1006/cyto.1998.0426.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.