- Research article
- Open Access
A Bacillus thuringiensis isolation method utilizing a novel stain, low selection and high throughput produced atypical results
© Rampersad and Ammons; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
- Received: 20 June 2005
- Accepted: 24 September 2005
- Published: 24 September 2005
Bacillus thuringiensis is a bacterium known for producing protein crystals with insecticidal properties. These toxins are widely sought after for controlling agricultural pests due to both their specificity and their applicability in transgenic plants. There is great interest in isolating strains with improved or novel toxin characteristics, however isolating B. thuringiensis from the environment is time consuming and yields relatively few isolates of interest. New approaches to B. thuringiensis isolation have been, and continue to be sought. In this report, candidate B. thuringiensis isolates were recovered from environmental samples using a combination of a novel stain, high throughput and reduced selection. Isolates were further characterized by SDS-PAGE, light microscopy, PCR, probe hybridization, and with selected isolates, DNA sequencing, bioassay or Electron Microscopy.
Based on SDS-PAGE patterns and the presence of cry genes or a crystal, 79 candidate, non-clonal isolates of B. thuringiensis were identified from 84 samples and over 10,000 colonies. Although only 16/79 (20%) of the isolates showed DNA homology by Probe Hybridization or PCR to common cry genes, initial characterization revealed a surprisingly rich library that included a putative nematocidal gene, a novel filamentous structure associated with a crystal, a spore with spikes originating from a very small parasporal body and isolates with unusually small crystals. When compared to reports of other screens, this screen was also atypical in that only 3/79 isolates (3.8%) produced a bipyramidal crystal and 24/79 (30%) of the isolates' spores possessed an attached, dark-staining body.
Results suggest that the screening methodology adopted in this study might deliver a vastly richer and potentially more useful library of B. thuringiensis isolates as compared to that obtained with commonly reported methodologies, and that by extension, methodologies fundamentally different from current methods should also be explored.
- Phase Contrast Microscopy
- Spodoptera Frugiperda
- Major Protein Band
- Bipyramidal Crystal
Bacillus thuringiensis is a bacterium known for producing protein crystals with pesticidal properties. These toxins are widely sought after for controlling agricultural pests due to both their specificity and their applicability in transgenic plants. Although any particular toxin has a desirably restricted host range, there is a large number of different toxins, each showing toxicity to one of many diverse pests. For these reasons there is currently great interest in isolating novel strains of B. thuringiensis with either unique host specificity or elevated toxicity. There are numerous reports on attempts to isolate novel B. thuringiensis strains from the environment [1, 2]. In many of these, some form of enrichment step is used in conjunction with Phase Contrast Microscopy as the backbone of the screening strategy [3, 4]. The results of these screens have a curiously similar result where a large proportion of the isolates (33.5% to 98%) contain a cry1 gene or a bipyramidal shaped crystal (known for toxicity against lepidopteran pests), [1, 5, 6] and relatively few, if any, novel or uniquely useful isolates are found. Herein we report on a screen for environmental isolates of B. thuringiensis on the Caribbean island of Trinidad, where a novel stain was used as an alternative to Phase Contrast Microscopy in a high-throughput method coupled with reduced selection.
Isolation of native strains
Classifying isolates as clonal (siblings) if they were from the same sample and had the same crystal or cap morphology, 79 non-clonal isolates were collected comprising mostly round or amorphous crystals with 6 rectangular and 3 bipyramidal morphologies. Some samples were found to have multiple candidates of B. thuringiensis, either of the same or different parasporal body morphology.
cry-cyt gene profile
Isolates positive for cry and cyt genes as determined by Probe Hybridization and PCR.
Bioassay (quick screen)
A "quick screen" using relatively large amounts of sporulated colonies was used to ascertain if any of the isolates demonstrated appreciable activity against the 5th instar larvae of agricultural pest, Spodoptera frugiperda. For most isolates, leaf pieces were completely eaten and given a score of 1.0 (non-toxic). Only one isolate and three control strains achieved a score greater than 2 and were considered toxic, (Bt2-46, with bipyramidal morphology and a score of 2.7; BGSC4A3, B. thuringiensis serovar thuringiensis HD2, Score 2.0; BGSC4D1, B. thuringiensis serovar kurstaki HD1, Score 2.0 and BGSC4J3, B. thuringiensis serovar aizawai HD133, Score 2.7).
With few exceptions [9, 10] the crystal and spore of B. thuringiensis are released separately during sporulation. It was thus surprising that 24/79 non-clonal, candidate B. thuringiensis isolates possessed spores with a "capped" appearance. Some of these caps appeared to contain crystals since phase dark objects with a light center could be seen in many of the caps, including Bt2-56, which was subsequently confirmed by Electron Microscopy to possess a parasporal body within the exosporium (Figure 4). The functional significance of spore-associated crystals is not totally understood however benefits such as protection against UV degradation and better access to the target organism have been attributed to crystals attached within an exosporium . If this is true, and the caps are shown to contain useful toxins, then those isolates showing the capped morphology may eventually prove useful in field applications. Clearly, more attention needs to be given to this phenotype and its mechanism of expression. For example, if the phenotype is plasmid encoded, could strains that undesirably liberate crystals be transformed to enclose their crystals within a protective cap?
Examples of filamentous appendages associated with bacterial spores are relatively rare where only a few isolates of Clostridium and Bacillus are reported to possess spores with appendages [12, 13]. Even rarer is the association of an appendage with a parasporal body, as was observed with both Bt1-88 and Bt2-56. Very little is presently known about Bt1-88 and studies are underway to characterize both the strain and the ultra structure of the appendage-associated complex. From preliminary studies undertaken with Bt2-56, this isolate clearly demonstrates an intimate relationship between the filament and the parasporal body where the parasporal body appears to help anchor the filament to the spore (Figure 4 and ). Both these isolates raise a number of questions fundamental to our basic understanding of bacteria and the role of spore associated appendages. Among these is the obvious question of a possible relationship between the appendage and B. thuringiensis crystals, i.e., did some crystals evolve to act as an anchoring structure for spore associated filaments and if so, do they still retain any toxin activity? Similarly, what is the role of the filament and does it aid in pathogenicity?
Sequence data indicated that a gene in Bt1-33 is highly homologous to the cry14Aa 1 gene, [GenBank: U13955] which has demonstrated activity against nematodes . It was surprising that this relatively small study would produce an isolate containing a putative nematocidal gene when a much larger study utilizing the same primers did not . However the gene in Bt1-33 is probably non-functional due to a frame-shift mutation, raising the question of why would it be maintained by the bacterium? One explanation could be that the gene is clustered in the genome with other genes necessary for pathogenicity as part of a pathogenicity island, and is being maintained in the genome indirectly through selection for the other genes in the group. Interestingly, PS80JJ1 (the strain gene U13955 is found in), has been shown to contain at least two other δ-endotoxin proteins Cry34Aa1 and Cry35Aa1, which together form a binary toxin shown to be active against Diabrotica virgifera (western corn rootworm). The corn root worm, like the nematode, is a soil-dwelling organism that B. thuringiensis are rarely active against. It is perhaps significant that U13955 is associated with other toxins that target a soil-dwelling organism, raising the question of whether PS80JJ1 is adapted against soil-dwelling organisms. If so, then perhaps like PS80JJ1, Bt1-33 may also possess other similarly rare toxin genes that target soil-dwelling organisms.
Using the PCR amplified fragment from the cry14Aa 1-like gene in Bt1-33 as a probe, another isolate, Bt1-35, showed a weaker but definite hybridization signal. Perhaps significant is that it was isolated from the same sample as Bt1-33. The sequence of this gene is presently unknown however the reduced hybridization signal shown suggests that it may be an evolutionary relative or even share limited sequence, such as a functional domain.
The isolation method used in this study diverged from many of the reported methods for B. thuringiensis isolation by utilizing a stain instead of Phase Contrast Microscopy (which is commonly used when screening for B. thuringiensis), for the identification of crystals [1, 16, 17]. Although Phase Contrast Microscopy was useful for observing inside spore caps, the stain uniquely allowed a fast, high throughput evaluation of bacterial colonies for the presence of crystals. Similarly, the high contrast of the stain allowed it to identify relatively small crystals or low numbers of caps in a specimen. It is doubtful that without these benefits of the stain that Bt1-88, Bt1-33/35 and the relatively small crystal producers would have been isolated. This study also sought to reduce the chance of excluding some isolates by not incorporating overt selection during the isolation of candidate bacteria (e.g., not using antibiotics in the culture medium). The importance of reducing selective pressures for the successful isolation of each strain was not determined. However, at least one of the important isolates, Bt1-33, was isolated using Method G, a selective method. Thus it is possible that selective enrichment coupled with the stain and high throughput screening could have resulted in the isolation of higher numbers of B. thuringiensis candidates than were obtained in this study. Similarly, the isolation of capped isolates, including Bt2-56, could not be directly attributed to the use of the stain or even the general isolation methodology used. For example, although not as evident as with the use of the stain, Phase Contrast Microscopy could be used to visualize the capped spores. Thus it is possible that the high level of capped spores observed is best attributable to their high or unique presence in the Trinidadian environment. For example, it is difficult to imagine how the cap-associated filament of Bt2-56 has not previously been identified elsewhere, when in this screen it was isolated from several specimens collected throughout Trinidad. However, the filament was not easily observed under Phase Contrast Microscopy without some special attention being given to finding it. For example, the filament was not observed immediately with Phase Contrast Microscopy and it was only by chance that, as a capped spore, Bt2-56 was chosen for more intense study and its filament found. Similarly, the spiked structures associated with Bt1-88 were not observed on primary isolation or initial examination with Phase Contrast Microscopy, and it was only through a re-screening of all capped spores for filaments similar to Bt2-56 that it was observed. These data would suggest that some capped spores contained in existing B. thuringiensis libraries might also possess appendages and should be re-examined specifically for their presence.
Perhaps most striking about this screen was the low percentage of isolates producing bipyramidal crystals. In literally all reported screens for environmental isolates of B. thuringiensis, the percentage of bipyramidal crystals is usually above 40% [18, 1], however only 3 isolates or 3.8 % of the non-clonal isolates where shown to have a bipyramidal morphology indicating a screen that deviated significantly from the norm.
Results suggest that there are advantages to using a stain over the commonly used Phase Contrast Microscopy, particularly in the detection of small crystals, low numbers of crystals/capped spores and for its applicability for use in the fast, high throughput detection of B. thuringiensis candidates from the environment. There is a continuing need to explore the benefits of new methodologies for the detection of B. thuringiensis from the environment.
Sample collection and preparation
Summary of preparation methods A-G
Sample heated for 15 min in Nutrient Broth at 65°C, then plated on Sporulation plates with 20 IU/ml penicillin G
4 hour Pre-incubation of sample in L-broth (30°C shaking at 250 rpm) then heated for 15 min at 65°C then plated on Sporulation plates
Same as Method B but plated on Sporulation plates with 20 IU/ml penicillin G
4 hour Pre-incubation of sample in L-broth/acetate  (30°C shaking at 250 rpm) then heated for 15 min at 65°C then plated on Sporulation plates
Same as Method D above except plated on Sporulation plates with 20 IU/ml penicillin G
Sample heated for 15 min in L-broth at 65°C then plated on Sporulation plates
Same as Method F above except plated on Sporulation plates with 20 IU/ml penicillin G
Preparation methods and their use.
Number of samples Screened
Number of Colonies Screened
Number of Samples with B. thuringiensis Isolates
B. thuringiensis isolation
Samples (0.25 g) were prepared using one or more of Methods A-G (Table 2), then 200 μl and 20 μl were cultured on Sporulation plates (Nutrient Agar with CCY salts  to which antibiotics were added as indicated in Table 2) at 30°C for 2 days to allow sporulation. Using a dissecting microscope and straight wire, an individual colony that conformed to the 'Bacillus cereus group' (i.e. white to off-white with a matt appearance and irregular edges) was spotted onto a microscope slide that was pre-gridded with a wax pencil into 60 rectangles, and then stored by stabbing a grid on a nutrient agar plate. The agar plate was placed at 4°C to minimize germination of the spores. Where more than one isolate from the same sample was observed possessing the same crystal morphology, they were considered clonal and not all such isolates were kept. The slide was heat fixed and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue  and viewed under Brightfield Microscopy using a 100X immersion oil objective. Cell morphology was noted for all candidates of B. thuringiensis, which was defined as a large spore-forming rod whose ellipsoidal spore did not swell the mother cell and which produced a parasporal body upon sporulation [20, 21].
SDS protein electrophoresis
Two loopfuls of bacterial growth were removed from a Sporulation plate to 50 μl of ice cold Protein Sample Buffer , boiled for 2 min then frozen until use. Denaturing SDS gel electrophoresis was performed on protein samples according to the method of Lamelli . The relative mobility for each band was calculated by applying the equation RH = A-C/A-B where A was the position of the top of the gel, B was the position of the top of the dye front and C was the position of the top of each band of interest. Relative mobility vs the molecular weights of known proteins (116 kDa, 92 kDa, 66 kDa, 45 kDa, 21 kDa) was plotted and linear regression performed to determine the equation for the line of best fit, which was used to determine the Molecular weights (KDa) of unknown bands.
PCR of toxin genes
Primers and probes utilized.
Juarez-Perez et al., 
Juarez-Perez et al., 
Juarez-Perez et al., 
Masson et al., 
cry3, 7, 8 Family
Ceron et al., 
Ben Dov et al., 
cry5, 12, 14, 21 Family
Bravo et al., 
Bravo et al., 
Bacillus 16S rDNA
Siefert et al., 
Hybridization of cry genes
Probe hybridization was performed using the DIG High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter Kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Cat# 1 745 832). cry and cyt gene probes were made by PCR (as described above) using the following bacterial strains from the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center (BGSC) as templates: cry1- BGSC4J3; cry2- BGSC4J3; cry3- BGSC4AA1; cry4- BGSC4Q1; cry5- Bt1-33; cyt1- BGSC4Q1; cyt2- BGSC4Q1; 16S- BGSC4J3
An ABI Cycle Sequencing Big Dye Ready Reaction kit (Catalogue # 4303500) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions and reactions resolved on an ABI 377 DNA Sequencing Machine. Primers gral-nem(d) and gral-nem(r)  were used to amplify and sequence the putative nematocidal gene in Bt1-33.
Bioassay (quick screen)
Larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda were collected from a corn field and used to generate up to 5 generations of larvae. The width of the head capsule was used to select 5th instar larvae for use in the bioassay . Larvae were starved for approximately 1 hour immediately prior to being challenged with one loopful of a bacterial isolate collected from a sporulated colony and smeared onto a 1 cm2 leaf piece (Sorghum halipense) in triplicate. Larvae were left for approximately 10 h then presented with a fresh piece of uninoculated leaf then left for a further 10–12 h. Scoring was: not eaten a score of 3; partially eaten a score of 2; completely eaten a score of 1. The toxicity value of a B. thuringiensis candidate was the average of the scores for the three trials, which were arbitrarily classified as: 1.0- not toxic; > 1.0 but < 2.0 – uncertain toxicity; = 2.0- toxic. All isolates in the library were tested, irrespective of whether they were considered clonal strains, as well as the five control strains obtained from the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center.
We would like to thank the Caribbean Development Bank and the University of the West Indies Campus and Publication Committee for their financial support of this project. We would like to thank Dan Ziegler and the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center for control strains.
- Bernhard K, Jarrett P, Meadows M, Butt J, Ellis DJ, Roberts GM, Pauli S, Rodgers P, Burges HG: Natural isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis: World wide Distribution, Characterization, and Activity against Insect Pests. J Invertebr Pathol. 1997, 70: 59-68. 10.1006/jipa.1997.4669.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vilas-Boas GT, Lemos MVF: Diversity of cry genes and genetic characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis isolated from Brazil. Can J Microbiol. 2004, 50: 605-613. 10.1139/w04-052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin PAW, Travers RS: Worldwide abundance and distribution of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989, 55: 2437-2442.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson C, Bishop AH: A technique for the effective enrichment and isolation of Bacillus thuringiensis. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1996, 142: 173-177. 10.1016/0378-1097(96)00261-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chak KF, Chao DC, Tseng MY, Kao SS, Tuan SJ, Feng TY: Determination and Distribution of cry-Type genes of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates from Taiwan. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994, 60: 2415-2420.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ben Dov E, Zaritsky A, Dahan E, Barak Z, Sinai R, Manasherob R, Khamrev A, Troitskaya E, Dubitsky A, Berezina N, Margalith Y: Extended Screening by PCR for seven cry group genes from field-collected strains of Bacillus thuringiensis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63: 4883-4890.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rampersad J, Khan A, Ammons D: Usefulness of Staining Parasporal Bodies when Screening for Bacillus thuringiensis. J Invertebr Pathol. 2002, 79: 203-4. 10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00018-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rampersad J, Khan A, Ammons D: A Bacillus thuringiensis isolate possessing a spore-associated filament. Curr Microbiol. 2003, 47: 355-357. 10.1007/s00284-003-4103-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohba M, Aizawa K: Serological identification of Bacillus thuringiensis and Related Bacteria isolated in Japan. J Invertebr Pathol. 1978, 32: 303-309. 10.1016/0022-2011(78)90193-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hastowo S, Lay BW, Ohba M: Naturally occurring Bacillus thuringiensis in Indonesia. J Appl Bacterio. 1992, 73: 108-113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aronson A: Sporulation and delta-endotoxin synthesis in Bacillus thuringiensis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002, 59: 417-425. 10.1007/s00018-002-8434-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hodgkiss W: Filamentous appendages on the spores and exosporium of certain Bacillus species. Spore Research. Edited by: Barker AN, Gould GW, Wolf J. 1971, Academic Press, London and New York, 211-218.Google Scholar
- Mizuki E, Ohba M, Ichimatsu T, Hwang SH, Higuchi K, Saitoh H, Akao T: Unique apppendages associated with spores of Bacillus cereus isolates. J Basic Microbiol. 1998, 38: 33-39. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4028(199803)38:1<33::AID-JOBM33>3.0.CO;2-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wei JZ, Hale K, Carta L, Platzer E, Wong C, Fang SC, Aroian RV: Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins that target nematodes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 2760-5. 10.1073/pnas.0538072100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bravo A, Sarabia S, Lopez L, Ontiveros H, Abarca C, Ortiz A, Ortiz M, Lina L, Villalobos FJ, Pena G, Nunez-Valdez M, Soberon M, Quintero R: Characterization of cry genes in a Mexican Bacillus thuringiensis strain collection. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998, 64: 4965-4972.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohba M, Aizawa K: Distribution of Bacillus thuringiensis in Soils of Japan. J Invertebr Pathol. 1986, 47: 277-282. 10.1016/0022-2011(86)90097-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bel Y, Granero F, Alberola TM, Martinez-Sebastian MJ, Ferre J: Distribution, frequency and diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis in olive tree environments in Spain. System Appl Microbiol. 1997, 20: 652-658.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meadows MP, Ellis DJ, Butt J, Jarrett P, Burges HD: Distribution, Frequency and diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis in an Animal Feed Mill. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992, 58: 1344-1350.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stewart GSAB, Johnstone K, Hagelberg E, Ellar DJ: Commitment of bacterial spores to germinate. Biochem J. 1981, 198: 101-106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeLucca AJ, Simonson JG, Larson AD: Bacillus thuringiensis distribution in soils of the United States. Can J Microbiol. 1981, 27: 865-870.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith RA, Couche GA: The phylloplane as a source of Bacillus thuringiensis variants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991, 57: 311-315.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaelin P, Morel P, Gadani F: Isolation of Bacillus thuringiensis from stored tobacco and Lasioderma serricorne (F). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994, 60: 19-25.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lamelli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Fitsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor, Cold Spring Harbor PressGoogle Scholar
- Dyar HG: The number of moults of lepidopterous larvae. Psyche. 1890, 5: 420-422.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Travers RS, Martin PAW, Reichelderfer CF: Selective Process for Efficient Isolation of Soil Bacillus spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987, 56: 1263-1266.Google Scholar
- Juarez-Perez VM, Ferrandis MD, Frutos R: PCR Based Approach for the Detection of novel Bacillus thuringiensis cry genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63: 2977-3002.Google Scholar
- Masson L, Erlandson M, Puzstai-Carey M, Brousseau R, Juarez-Perez V, Frutos R: A Holistic Approach for determining the Entomopathogenic potential of Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998, 64: 4782-4788.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ceron J, Ortiz A, Quintero R, Guereca L, Bravo A: Specific PCR primers directed to identify cry I and cry III genes within a Bacillus thuringiensis strain collection. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995, 61: 3826-3831.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siefert JL, Larios-Sanz M, Nakamura LK, Slepecky RA, Paul JH, Moore ERB, Fox GE, Jurtshuk P: Phylogeny of Marine Bacillus Isolates from the Gulf of Mexico. Curr Microbiol. 2000, 41: 84-88. 10.1007/s002840010098.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.