Skip to main content
Download PDF

Metagenomic 16S rRNA analysis and predictive functional profiling revealed intrinsic organohalides respiration and bioremediation potential in mangrove sediment

BMC Microbiology volume 24, Article number: 176 (2024) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 08 June 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Mangrove sediment microbes are increasingly attracting scientific attention due to their demonstrated capacity for diverse bioremediation activities, encompassing a wide range of environmental contaminants.

Materials and methods

The microbial communities of five Avicennia marina mangrove sediment samples collected from Al Rayyis White Head, Red Sea (KSA), were characterized using Illumina amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA genes.

Results

Our study investigated the microbial composition and potential for organohalide bioremediation in five mangrove sediments from the Red Sea. While Proteobacteria dominated four microbiomes, Bacteroidetes dominated the fifth. Given the environmental concerns surrounding organohalides, their bioremediation is crucial. Encouragingly, we identified phylogenetically diverse organohalide-respiring bacteria (OHRB) across all samples, including Dehalogenimonas, Dehalococcoides, Anaeromyxobacter, Desulfuromonas, Geobacter, Desulfomonile, Desulfovibrio, Shewanella and Desulfitobacterium. These bacteria are known for their ability to dechlorinate organohalides through reductive dehalogenation. PICRUSt analysis further supported this potential, predicting the presence of functional biomarkers for organohalide respiration (OHR), including reductive dehalogenases targeting tetrachloroethene (PCE) and 3-chloro-4-hydroxyphenylacetate in most sediments. Enrichment cultures studies confirmed this prediction, demonstrating PCE dechlorination by the resident microbial community. PICRUSt also revealed a dominance of anaerobic metabolic processes, suggesting the microbiome’s adaptation to the oxygen-limited environment of the sediments.

Conclusion

This study provided insights into the bacterial community composition of five mangrove sediments from the Red Sea. Notably, diverse OHRB were detected across all samples, which possess the metabolic potential for organohalide bioremediation through reductive dehalogenation pathways. Furthermore, PICRUSt analysis predicted the presence of functional biomarkers for OHR in most sediments, suggesting potential intrinsic OHR activity by the enclosed microbial community.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Distributed along tropical and subtropical coastlines at the land-sea interface, mangrove ecosystems occupy a unique environmental niche [1, 2]. Notably, mangrove forests play pivotal roles in ecosystem function by filtering and reducing both dissolved and particulate nutrients. Additionally, they serve as crucial reservoirs for carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, even sequestering heavy metals from adjacent terrestrial environments [3]. These unique conditions render mangrove sediments ideal habitats for diverse microbial communities to thrive.

Mangrove-associated microbial communities exert significant influence on biogeochemical cycling within these ecosystems, facilitating the transformation of carbon, sulfur, nitrogen, and phosphorus through diverse metabolic pathways [1]. Furthermore, the complex and phylogenetically diverse nature of mangrove microbiota underpins their critical roles in maintaining ecosystem productivity and facilitating post-disturbance recovery processes within these vital habitats [4].

Mangrove sediments, characterized by their high nutrient content, serve as a rich habitat fostering the proliferation of diverse bacterial communities with potent metabolic and bioremediation capabilities [5, 6]. Mangrove ecosystems act as biogeochemical sinks for various xenobiotic pollutants, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), heavy metals, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [7,8,9]. This widespread accumulation suggests the presence of a robust microbial community harboring diverse bioremediation capabilities.

Studies have identified a wide range of phylogenetically diverse bacterial genera residing within this environment, including Pseudomonas, Marinobacter, Alcanivorax, Microbulbifer, Sphingomonas, Micrococcus, Cellulomonas, Dietzia and Gordonia. Notably, these bacteria have exhibited the ability to degrade harmful hydrocarbons, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [10, 11]. Furthermore, research suggests that mangrove sediments possess significant potential for bioremediation strategies, demonstrating efficacy in the decontamination of oil spills [12]. Metagenomic analysis of oil-contaminated mangrove sediments identified Geobacter, Rhodopseudomonas, and Pseudomonas, Shewanella, Anaeromyxobacter, Rhodopirellula, and Thioalkalivibrio as the dominant bacterial genera [13].

Chloroethene contaminants, such as tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE), and dichloroethane (DCE), are prevalent in groundwater due to their extensive use in industry as solvents and degreasers [14]. Their persistence and potential to cause cancer necessitate their classification as priority pollutants, requiring monitoring across diverse environmental settings. Microbial reductive dechlorination, a process extensively documented in anaerobic groundwater systems, serves as the primary mechanism for degrading PCE and TCE, potentially mitigating their environmental impact [15, 16]. This process relies on organohalide-respiring bacteria (OHRB), which utilize organohalide compounds as their final electron acceptors for energy production [17]. The environmental significance of OHRB-mediated dechlorination, particularly in sedimentary systems, has attracted significant research interest due to its potential for natural bioremediation [18, 19]. This biogeochemical phenomenon exhibits near-ubiquity in anaerobic aquifers [15, 16, 20,21,22] and extends to a diverse array of sedimentary environments [23,24,25,26], highlighting its widespread ecological importance.

This study investigates the potential for microbial-mediated dechlorination of organohalides within the mangrove ecosystem. Illumina amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene will be employed to characterize the microbiome composition of mangrove sediment samples. Given the established role of organohalide respiration (OHR) in anaerobic bioremediation of toxic organohalides, the study further aims to detect the presence of phylogenetically diverse OHRB. Additionally, efforts will be made to predict functional OHR biomarkers and directly assess in situ organohalide dehalogenation activity within an enrichment culture simulating the mangrove sediment environment.

Materials and methods

Sampling site and samples collection

Five mangrove sediment samples designated MS1-MS5 were collected from the root zone of Avicennia marina stands (MS1, 23°35’57.2"N 38°32’39.5"E; MS2, 23°35’58.3"N 38°32’28.3"E; MS3, 23°35’47.9"N 38°32’36.1"E; MS4, 23°35’23.3"N 38°32’23.4"E; MS5, 23°19’59.7"N 38°41’52.3"E) along the shore of Al Rayes city, Red Sea, KSA (Fig. 1). Avicennia marina is the dominant mangrove species in the marine environment of the Al Rayes White Head region and along the shore of Al Rayes city. They typically range in height from 1 to 4 m and possess light gray bark with stiff flakes and thick, glossy, and bright green leaves on the upper side and gray or silvery white with small hairs on the lower side. Mangrove sediment samples were collected from various locations to a depth of approximately 0.15 m using pre-sterilized polyethylene bags. The collected samples were then placed in sterile containers, sealed tightly, and transported to the laboratory for further microbiological analyses.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Geographical map showing sampling sites for the five samples addressed by this study

Full size image

Genomic DNA extraction, PCR amplification and Illumina amplicon sequencing

Total genomic DNA was directly extracted from approximately 1.0 g of mangrove sediment using an UltraClean Soil DNA purification kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Solana Beach, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Subsequently, PCR amplification targeted the bacterial hypervariable region V3-V4 of the 16S rRNA gene using the universal primer pair 341 F (CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG) and 805R (GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC) [27, 28]. The reaction followed the Illumina 16S rRNA Metagenomic Sequencing Library protocol (www.illumina.com) and was performed at Macrogen sequencing facility (Seoul, South Korea). The amplification program included an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. A final extension cycle at 72 °C for 5 min concluded the program. The resulting PCR amplicons (~ 450 bp) were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform (2 × 300 bp paired-end reads) at Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea).

Bioinformatics and diversity analysis

Following 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, taxonomic assignment and downstream statistical analyses were performed on raw reads using the MG-RAST platform [29]. Low-quality sequences were trimmed from FASTQ files uploaded to MG-RAST using SolexaQA [30]. Potential human sequences were subsequently removed with Bowtie [31], leaving only high-quality reads for further analysis. Sequences were annotated against the SILVA SSU Ref database [32] with a minimum identity of 60%, maximum alignment length of 15 bp, and an e-value of 1e-5. Downstream bioinformatic and statistical analyses were conducted using the 16S rRNA gene Microbiome Taxonomic Profiling (MTP) pipeline (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/contents/16smtp) on an EzBioCloud server [33]. Paired-end reads were merged after uploading using VSEARCH version 2.13.4 [34] and filtered for low-quality (< Q25), chimeric, and non-target amplicons. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were then clustered at 97% sequence similarity using UCLUST [35] and CDHIT [36] softwares integrated within the EzBioCloud server. OTU picking and annotation were performed against the server’s PKSSU4.0 database [33]. Alpha-diversity indices, including Good’s coverage, rarefaction, observed OTUs, Simpson, Shannon, and Abundance-based Coverage Estimator (ACE), were then calculated. Beta diversity was determined using the UniFrac distance metric and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). PCoA analysis was also calculated by the EzBioCloud server, conducted at the genus level and visualized using XLSTAT (Addinsoft, New York, USA) software. A correlation analysis was done using the online free server, Science and research online plot (https://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/en). The p significance level was set at 0.05. A Venn diagram depicting unique and shared OTUs across samples was generated using the InteractiVenn online tool (http://www.interactivenn.net/).

Predictive functional profiling and phylogenetic analysis

Predictive functional profiling was performed using the Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) tool embedded in EzBioCloud [37] in conjunction with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases [38]. The PICRUSt tool uses the Kruskal-Wallis H test to identify significantly.

different functional profiles on a cutoff value of P < 0.05 [39]. Heatmaps visualizing functional biomarker distribution were generated with the SRplot online tool (https://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/en). Finally, a phylogenetic tree for identified genera was constructed using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA X software [40] and visualized with the Interactive Tree of Life (ITOL), (https://itol.embl.de).

Establishment of mangrove sediment enrichment cultures

Mangrove sediment enrichment cultures were established in 100 mL sterile Duran bottles equipped with leak-proof screw caps. Each bottle contained 20% (w/v) sediment prepared in a basal mineral medium composed of (per liter): K2HPO4, 4.36 g; NaH2PO4, 3.45 g; (NH4)2SO4, 1.26 g; MgSO4.6H2O, 0.91 g; trace salt solution, 1 ml. Trace salt solution contained (per 100 ml): CaCl2.2H2O, 4.77 g; FeSO4.7H2O, 0.37 g; CoCl2.6H2O, 0.37 g; MnCl2, 0.1 g; Na2MoO4.2H2O, 0.02 g. Cultures were spiked with PCE (Sigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany) as an electron acceptor to a final concentration of 100 µM. An unspiked culture served as a control. Established enrichment cultures were then injected with hydrogen gas as an electron donor and incubated at 30 °C for one month before further analysis [41].

Gas chromatography/FID analysis

Chlorinated ethenes were analyzed by using a high-resolution gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) (Thermo Scientific Trace 1300 series). Ten µL samples were withdrawn from the headspace of established enrichment cultures and directly injected into the GC using a split/splitless injector. Separation of chlorinated ethenes was achieved on a TG-5MS fused silica capillary column (Restek, USA; 30 m, 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 μm film thickness) using the following temperature program: initial oven temperature of 40 °C held for 3 min, followed by a ramp to 80 °C at 8 °C/min, then another ramp to 190 °C at 44 °C/min, with a final hold at 190 °C for 5 min. Injector and detector temperatures were maintained at 260 °C and 300 °C, respectively. Splitless injection mode was employed with helium as the carrier gas [42].

Results

Characterization of mangrove sediment bacterial community

Five mangrove sediment samples were examined to unveil their bacterial community structure (microbiome) using Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The valid reads values were ranged from 99.16 to 99.16% (Table 1). The sequencing effort yielded a total of 47,419 to 92,882 reads per sample, encompassing 301 to 4467 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (Table 1). Variations in OTUs composition across mangrove sediments might be associated with ecological factors influencing community structure along Al Rayyis White Head (Red Sea, KSA). Sampling sites MS1, MS4, and MS5 exhibited well-developed mangrove trees, forming dense vegetation, while sites MS2 and MS3 were characterized by patches of dwarf mangroves with limited stands of Avicennia marina. These contrasting plant communities could contribute to the observed differences in microbial diversity and community composition. High Good’s coverage scores (> 99%) (Table 1) indicated comprehensive capture of the resident bacterial communities, further supported by plateauing rarefaction curves (Fig. 2), demonstrating adequate sequencing depth for accurate diversity assessment.

Table 1 Alpha diversity indices (valid reads, valid reads percentage, OTUs obtained and Good’s coverage of library (%)) identified in our microbiomes
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Rarefaction curves for the five mangrove-microbiomes identified in this study

Full size image

Diversity analysis of bacterial communities

Shannon, ACE, and Chao1 indices revealed significantly higher alpha diversity in MS1, MS4, and MS5 compared to MS2 and MS3, suggesting greater richness and evenness within these microbial communities (Fig. 3). Conversely, the Simpson index indicated lower dominance in MS1, MS4, and MS5, further supporting diverse and less skewed taxonomic distributions. PCoA analysis (Fig. 4A) visualized distinct beta diversity patterns across sampling sites. Samples clustered into four distinct groups: MS1, MS2, MS3, and a combined group for MS4 and MS5, highlighting substantial compositional dissimilarities between sites. A correlation analysis (Fig. 4B) showed a positive correlation between all samples. The highest positive correlation value was identified between MS1 and MS samples, while the lowest one was found between MS3 and MS4 samples. Further, the Venn diagram (Fig. 4C) identified 66 OTUs shared across all microbiomes, while 112, 109, 52, 49, and 33 OTUs were unique to MS1, MS2, MS3, MS4, and MS5, respectively, emphasizing site-specific differences in bacterial taxa.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Diversity indices for the five mangrove microbiomes identified in this study

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Similarity (or dissimilarity) between the five microbiomes where (A), PCoA plot showing clustering of the five microbiomes obtained in this study, the plot was performed based on weighted UniFrac distances. (B), Venn diagram showing the shared and the unique OTUs for the microbiomes obtained in this study

Full size image

Comparative analysis of mangrove microbiome

Taxonomic classification of sequencing reads from the five mangrove microbiomes was performed using the SILVA reference database and the MG-RAST pipeline. At the phylum level (Fig. 5A), the Proteobacteria was the dominating phylum 3 of our 5 samples, accounting for 42.5%, 26% and 45.8% of the identified taxa in MS1, MS2 and MS4 samples, respectively. Unclassified bacterial sequences (18.6–60%) and Bacteroidetes (8.8–57.8%), Actinobacteria (0.2–4.2%) and Firmicutes (0.4–23.3%) followed in abundance across most samples. Notably, MS3 exhibited a unique phylum composition, with Bacteroidetes (57.6%) exceeding Proteobacteria (33%) in abundance. Interestingly, MS5 diverged by harbouring the highest proportion of unclassified bacterial sequences (60%). At the genus level, (Fig. 5B) the majority of sequences were assigned to unclassified derived from bacteria (37.6%), unclassified derived from Gammaproteobacteria (5.3%) and unclassified derived from Deltaproteobacteria (5.2%) in MS1 sample, unclassified derived from bacteria (18.5%), Pseudoalteromonas (11%) and Aquimarina (8.2%) in MS2 sample, Flammeovirga (48.4%), unclassified derived from bacteria (8.4%) and Vibrio (5.4%) in MS3 sample, unclassified derived from bacteria (26.9%), unclassified derived from Epsilonproteobacteria (21%) and unclassified derived from Gammaproteobacteria (7.1%) in MS4 sample and unclassified derived from bacteria (60%), Gammaproteobacteria (4.5%) and Arenibacter (4%) in MS5 sample. These observations highlight distinct phylum and genus levels profiles across the mangrove sediment microbiomes, suggesting potential functional and ecological variations.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Bacterial community composition associated with the five mangrove sediments at phylum level (A) and genus level (B). Phyla and genera that took up < 0.01% of our microbiomes were identified together as other in the figure

Full size image

Distribution and abundance of OHRB

Known organohalide-respiring bacteria (OHRB) predominantly reside within the phyla Chloroflexi, Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes [43]. In this study, Chloroflexi exhibited a small relative abundance (< 1%) across all samples (Fig. 5A), Conversely, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes displayed markedly higher relative abundance values ranged from 20 to 45.8% and 0.8–23.3%, respectively (Fig. 5A). OHRB genera can be categorized as either obligate or versatile based on their sole reliance on OHR for energy acquisition [44]. Figure 6 depicts obligate OHRB genera Dehalococcoides and Dehalogenimonas belonging to Chloroflexi. Versatile OHRB genera, encompassing Anaeromyxobacter, Desulfuromonas, Geobacter, Desulfomonile, Desulfovibrio, and Shewanella from Proteobacteria, and Desulfitobacterium from Firmicutes, have been detected in mangrove sediments (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Heatmap plot showing the OHRB identified in the five microbiomes obtained in this study

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

16s rRNA-based circular phylogenetic tree showing all genera obtained in this study. Genera belonging to phyla Firmicutes, Chloroflexi and Proteobacteria, identified so far to harbor OHRB, were highlighted in the yellow, green, and red color, respectively. black arrows refer to genera of OHRB identified in this study. OHRB genera were shown also in bold font

Full size image

Potential organohalide respiration and diverse metabolic activities

PICRUSt functional predictions identified two key OHR biomarkers: PCE reductive dehalogenase (KEGG KO K21647) and 3-chloro-4-hydroxyphenylacetate (Cl-OHPA) reductive dehalogenase (KEGG KO K21566) (Fig. 8A, B). These findings, coupled with the taxonomic presence of known OHRB genera (Figs. 6 and 7), suggest potential OHR activity within the sediment samples. Beyond OHR, PICRUSt revealed functional biomarkers for diverse metabolic activities across the samples (Fig. 8A). Notably, biomarkers associated with anaerobic processes, such as dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia (DNRA), anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation, and methanogenesis, displayed high relative abundances. These findings suggest a rich and potentially complex metabolic landscape within the studied mangrove sediments.

Fig. 8
figure 8

PICRUSt-constructed heatmap plot showing predictive functional biomarkers where (A) represents the overall major metabolic biomarkers identified as I, OHR; II, Nitrogen cycle; III, Aerobic hydrocarbon degradation; IV, Anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation; V, Sulfur cycle; VI, Methane oxidation and VII, Methanogenesis, while (B) represents identified biomarkers for OHR. The heatmap was constructed using EZ-biocloud server based on taxonomic 16S rRNA gene sequences

Full size image

Confirmation of dechlorination activity and bioremediation potential

Dechlorination activity within the studied mangrove sediment was confirmed through gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID) analysis (Fig. 9). The chromatogram demonstrated the successful dechlorination of PCE to its daughter products, including trichloroethene (TCE), dichloroethene (DCE), vinyl chloride (VC), and ultimately, ethene. This confirms the presence and activity of dechlorinating microorganisms in the sediment. The bioremediation potential of the collected mangrove sediments was further evaluated through an enrichment culture study using PCE as a representative organohalide contaminant. This choice was based on its frequent detection as a groundwater pollutant and its known carcinogenicity. A comparative analysis of our findings with previously reported PCE dechlorination data (Table 2) suggests that various OHRB may be involved in PCE dechlorination to TCE and DCE, while Dehalococcoides, the only identified OHRB with documented DCE-to-ethene dechlorination activity, likely drives the final step.

Fig. 9
figure 9

PCE dechlorination in mangrove sediment-amended enriched culture

Full size image
Table 2 Potential OHRB detected in this study and their experimentally proved dehalogenating activities identified in previous studies
Full size table

Discussion

Despite their established role as crucial microbial sinks [10, 11], the potential of mangrove sediments for bioremediation and removal of toxic pollutants like organohalides remains largely unexplored. Previous studies, such as Ding and He [51], suggest that the intrinsic bioremediation capacity of sediments is linked to the activity and distribution of indigenous bacteria, particularly those possessing reductive dehalogenation capabilities. This study investigates the microbial communities associated with five mangrove sediments, focusing on genera identified as OHRB, key players in the efficient and effective bioremediation of organohalides under anaerobic conditions. Additionally, an enrichment culture experiment assesses the actual ability of these mangrove sediments to bioremediate organohalides using PCE as a representative example.

After excluding unclassified sequences from our samples, Proteobacteria emerged as the dominant phylum in four examined microbiomes, aligning with established trends in mangrove sediments [52,53,54]. Notably, Bacteroidetes ranked second in two samples, mirroring findings from the Beibu Gulf and Red Sea [55, 56]. However, our results diverged from Beilun Estuary, where Chloroflexi held the second-most abundant position [56], and the Bay of Bengal, where Cyanobacteria and Acidobacteria dominated [57]. These variations highlight the influence of regional and environmental factors on mangrove sediment microbiome composition.

This study identified diverse OHRB and PCE dechlorination activity in mangrove sediments along Al Rayyis White Head (Red Sea, KSA). Notably, obligate OHRB belonging to the genera Dehalococcoides and Dehalogenimonas were detected in two sediment samples, both affiliated with the phylum Chloroflexi. Interestingly, phylum Chloroflexi was absent in sediment MS3, where Proteobacteria was not the dominant phylum. The presence of obligate OHRB like Dehalococcoides and Dehalogenimonas strongly suggests potential OHR activity in these sediments, as this dehalorespiration process serves as their sole energy and growth source [58,59,60]. These findings highlight the potential role of specific bacterial taxa in mediating organohalide biodegradation in these mangrove ecosystems.

Several studies support the role of Dehalococcoides (phylum Chloroflexi) in mangrove sediment biodegradation. For instance, Dehalogenating Dehalococcoides sp. has been previously reported for the anaerobic removal of BDE-47 [61]. Additionally, Liang et al. [62] described interactions between obligate OHRB like Dehalococcoides and non-obligate OHRB like Geobacter (phylum Proteobacteria) during OHR. These interactions might include syntrophic cooperation or synergistic growth, potentially explaining the high relative abundance of Proteobacteria observed in our study and its possible positive correlation with Chloroflexi abundance, OHRB presence, and OHR activity.

Beyond Dehalococcoides, our study identified various non-obligate OHRB genera, including Anaeromyxobacter, Desulfuromonas, Geobacter, Desulfomonile, Desulfovibrio, Shewanella (phylum Proteobacteria) and Desulfitobacterium (phylum Firmicutes). Notably, Desulfitobacterium encompasses numerous strains capable of dechlorinating both aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons [45], suggesting its potential contribution to biodegradation processes in these sediments.

PICRUSt analysis identified functional biomarkers for OHR, including PCE and Cl-OHPA reductive dehalogenases, confirming the potential for OHR activity within our sediment samples. To our knowledge, this is the first report of PICRUSt-predicted reductive dehalogenases in mangrove sediments. Notably, PICRUSt also revealed functional biomarkers for diverse anaerobic metabolic activities, exhibiting higher relative abundances than aerobic pathways. These include DNRA, anaerobic hydrocarbon biodegradation, and methanogenesis. This suggests a specialization of the mangrove sediment microbiome towards anaerobic processes, potentially supporting ecosystem productivity through DNRA-mediated nitrogen cycling [63, 64]. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated the role of mangrove sediments in anaerobic hydrocarbon biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [65, 66] and petroleum oil [67], while methanogenesis has been established as a significant contributor to global methane emissions, with mangrove wetlands playing a major role [68,69,70]. Anaerobic bacterial capabilities were recoded before at a depth of 10–15 cm for aromatic hydrocarbon degradation using a mangrove sediment [66] and at a depth of 11–15 cm for methanogenesis using a lake sediment [71].

GC-FID analysis of PCE-spiked enrichment culture revealed DCE as the primary daughter product, followed by minor VC and ethene detections. This pattern suggests potential involvement of various OHRB in PCE dechlorination to DCE, while the subsequent transformation to non-toxic ethene might be driven by Dehalococcoides, as reported previously [72]. This aligns with Maymo-Gatell et al.‘s observation of slower Dehalococcoides growth on DCE compared to other electron acceptors [73], although the reason for this remains unclear.

Previous studies have utilized molecular tools to detect OHRB in mangrove sediments. Pan et al. [61] employed qRT-PCR to confirm the presence of OHRB, including Dehalococcoides, and suggested their potential contribution to PBDE bioremediation. While T-RFLP and clone library analyses revealed PBDE degradation in mangrove sediments, no significant correlation between Dehalococcoides abundance and debromination activity was observed [74]. Additionally, Chen et al. [75] identified OHRB genera (Dehalobacter, Dehalococcoides, Dehalogenimonas, and Desulfitobacterium) in a BDE-47 degrading microcosm enriched with mangrove sediment and biochar. However, unlike our study, none of these investigations employed environmentally benign PCE as the organohalide source or implemented PICRUSt analysis to specifically confirm the presence of functional OHR biomarkers (reductive dehalogenases).

Conclusion

This study provides compelling evidence for the intrinsic bioremediation and dechlorination potential of PCE within mangrove sediments collected from Al Rayyis White Head (Red Sea, KSA). Anaerobic enrichment cultures experiments directly demonstrate this capability, while 16S rRNA metagenomic analysis reveals the presence of diverse OHRB potentially involved in the process. Importantly, the study provides strong evidence for the existence of both OHRB and their activity through the identification of key functional biomarkers, reductive dehalogenases using the PICRUSt tool. These findings significantly contribute to our understanding of how indigenous microbes in mangrove sediments mediate PCE dechlorination and bioremediation. Moreover, they highlight the exciting possibility of enriching and isolating specific microbes from these sediments for further bioremediation applications.

Availability of data and materials

The raw amplicon sequencing datasets obtained in this study were deposited into National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database and are available under accession number PRJNA987345.

Change history

References

  1. Holguin G, Vazquez P, Bashan Y. The role of sediment microorganisms in the productivity, conservation, and rehabilitation of mangrove ecosystems: an overview. Biol Fertil Soils. 2001;33:265–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kathiresan K, Bingham BL. Biology of mangroves and mangrove ecosystems. Adv Mar Biol. 2001;40:81–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gomes NC, Cleary DF, Pires AC, Almeida A, Cunha A, Mendonça-Hagler LC, Smalla K. Assessing variation in bacterial composition between the rhizospheres of two mangrove tree species. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2014;139:40–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alongi DM. Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2014;6(1):195–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu M, Huang H, Bao S, Tong Y. Microbial community structure of soils in Bamenwan mangrove wetland. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kathiresan K, Selvam MM. Evaluation of beneficial bacteria from mangrove soil. Bot Mar. 2006;49:86–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2006.011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Duke NC, Meynecke JO, Dittmann S, Ellison AM, Anger K, Berger U, et al. A world without mangroves. Sci. 2007;317(5834):41–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramsay MA, Swannell RP, Shipton WA, Duke NC, Hill RT. Effect of bioremediation on the microbial community in oiled mangrove sediments. Mar Pollut Bull. 2000;41(7–12):413–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brito EM, Duran R, Guyoneaud R, Goñi-Urriza M, De Oteyza TG, Crapez MA, Wasserman JC. A case study of in situ oil contamination in a mangrove swamp (Rio De Janeiro, Brazil). Mar Pollut Bull. 2009;58(3):418–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Machado LF, de Assis Leite DC, da Costa Rachid CTC, Paes JE, Martins EF, Peixoto RS, Rosado AS. Tracking mangrove oil bioremediation approaches and bacterial diversity at different depths in an in situ mesocosms system. Front Microbiol. 2019;10: 2107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cabral L, Noronha MF, de Sousa STP, Lacerda-Júnior GV, Richter L, Fostier AH, de Oliveira VM. The metagenomic landscape of xenobiotics biodegradation in mangrove sediments. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;179:232–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. ATSDR, U. CERCLA priority list of hazardous substances. 2007. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/cercla/07list.html.

  13. McCarty PL, Reinhard M. Biological and chemical transformations of halogenated aliphatic compounds in aquatic and terrestrial environments. In: Oremland RS, editor. The biogeochemistry of global change: radiative trace gases. New York: Chapman & Hall, Inc.; 1993. p. 839–52.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Vogel TM, et al. Natural bioremediation of chlorinated solvents. In: Norris RD, editor., et al., Handbook of bioremediation. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers; 1994. p. 201–25.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jugder BE, Ertan H, Bohl S, Lee M, Marquis CP, Manefield M. Organohalide respiring bacteria and reductive dehalogenases: key tools in organohalide bioremediation. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Häggblom MM, Bossert ID. Halogenated organic compounds-a global perspective. In: Dehalogenation: microbial processes and environmental applications. Boston: Springer US; 2003. p. 3–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Leys D, Adrian L, Smidt H. Organohalide respiration: microbes breathing chlorinated molecules. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 2013;368(1616):20120316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chapelle FH. Identifying redox conditions that favour the natural attenuation of chlorinated ethenes in contaminated ground-water systems. In: Symposium on natural attenuation of chlorinated organics in ground water. 1996. p. 17–20.

  19. Gossett JM, Zinder SH. Microbiological aspects relevant to natural attenuation of chlorinated ethenes. In: Symposium on natural attenuation of chlorinated organics in ground water. 1997. p. 10–13.

  20. El-Sayed WS, Al-Senani SR, Elbahloul Y. Diversity of dehalorespiring bacteria and selective enrichment of aryl halides-dechlorinating consortium from sedimentary environment near an oil refinery. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2018;12(6):711–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zanaroli G, Balloi A, Negroni A, Daffonchio D, Young LY, Fava F. Characterization of the microbial community from the marine sediment of the Venice lagoon capable of reductive dechlorination of coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). J Haz Mat. 2010;178:417–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kjellerup BV, Naff C, Edwards SJ, Ghosh U, Baker JE, Sowers KR. Effects of activated carbon on reductive dechlorination of PCBs by organohalide respiring bacteria indigenous to sediments. Water Res. 2014;52:1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vandermeeren P, Herrmann S, Cichocka D, Busschaert P, Lievens B, Richnow HH, Springael D. Diversity of dechlorination pathways and organohalide respiring bacteria in chlorobenzene dechlorinating enrichment cultures originating from river sludge. Biodegradation. 2014;25(5):757–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. El-Sayed WS. Characterization of a highly enriched microbial consortium reductively dechlorinating 2,3-dichlorophenol and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol and the corresponding cprA genes from river sediment. Pol J Microbiol. 2016;65(3):341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu H, Wang Y, Wang X, Luan T, Tam NF. Distribution and accumulation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in Hong Kong mangrove sediments. Sci Total Environ. 2014;468:130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pan Y, Chen J, Zhou H, Cheung SG, Tam NF. Degradation of BDE-47 in mangrove sediments under alternating anaerobic-aerobic conditions. J Haz Mat. 2019;378:120709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Robin SL, Marchand C. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in mangrove ecosystems: a review. Environ Pollut. 2022;311: 119959.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghizelini AM, Mendonça-Hagler LCS, Macrae A. Microbial diversity in Brazilian mangrove sediments: a mini review. Braz J Microbiol. 2012;43:1242–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer F, Paarmann D, D’Souza M, Olson R, Glass EM, Kubal M, et al. The metagenomics RAST server – a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinform. 2008;9:386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cox MP, Peterson DA, Biggs PJ. SolexaQA: at-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10: R25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(21):7188–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, Chun J. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahe F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;4: e2584.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinform. 2010;26(19):2460–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinform. 2012;28(23):3150–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Huttenhower C. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(9):814–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids res. 2012;40(D1):D109–114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim SS, Eun JW, Cho HJ, Song DS, Kim CW, Kim YS, Lee SW, Kim YK, Yang J, Choi J, et al. Microbiome as a potential diagnostic and predictive biomarker in severe alcoholic hepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021;53(4):540–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Widdel F, Kohring GW, Mayer F. Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids: III. Characterization of the filamentous gliding Desulfonema limicola gen. nov. sp. nov., and Desulfonema magnum sp. nov. Arch Microbiol. 1983;134:286–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ismaeil M, Yoshida N, Katayama A. Identification of multiple dehalogenase genes involved in tetrachloroethene-toethene dechlorination in a Dehalococcoides-dominated enrichment culture. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:9191086.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Atashgahi S, Lu Y, Smidt H. Overview of known organohalide-respiring bacteria – phylogenetic diversity and environmental distribution. In: Adrian L, Löffler FE, editors. Organohalide-respiring bacteria. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2016. p. 63–105.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Türkowsky D, Jehmlich N, Diekert G, Adrian L, Von Bergen M, Goris T. An integrative overview of genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses in organohalide respiration research. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94(3):fiy013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Villemur R, Lanthier M, Beaudet R, Lépine F. The Desulfitobacterium genus. FEMS Microbiol rev. 2006;30(5):706–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cole JR, Cascarelli AL, Mohn WW, Tiedje JM. Isolation and characterization of a novel bacterium growing via reductive dehalogenation of 2-chlorophenol. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60(10):3536–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Sanford RA, Cole JR, Tiedje JM. Characterization and description of Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans gen. nov., sp. nov., an aryl-halorespiring facultative anaerobic myxobacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(2):893–900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Krumholz LR. Desulfuromonas chloroethenica sp. nov. uses tetrachloroethylene andtrichloroethylene as electron acceptors. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47(4):1262–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fredrickson JK, Romine MF, Beliaev AS, Auchtung JM, Driscoll ME, Gardner TS, et al. Towards environmental systems biology of Shewanella. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:592–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sung Y, Fletcher KE, Ritalahti KM, Apkarian RP, Ramos-Hernández N, Sanford RA, Löffler FE. Geobacter lovleyi sp. nov. strain SZ, a novel metal-reducing and tetrachloroethene-dechlorinating bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(4):2775–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ding C, He J. Molecular techniques in the biotechnological fight against halogenated compounds in anoxic environments. Microb Biotechnol. 2012;5(3):347–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Basak P, Pramanik A, Sengupta S, Nag S, Bhattacharyya A, Roy D, Bhattacharyya M. Bacterial diversity assessment of pristine mangrove microbial community from Dhulibhashani, Sundarbans using 16S rRNA gene tag sequencing. Genom Data. 2016;7:76–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mendes LW, Tsai SM. Variations of bacterial community structure and composition in mangrove sediment at different depths in Southeastern Brazil. Diversity. 2014;6:827–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wu P, Xiong X, Xu Z, Lu C, Cheng H, Lyu X, Lou Q. Bacterial communities in the rhizospheres of three mangrove tree species from Beilun Estuary, China. PLoS One. 2016;11(10): e0164082.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhao H, Yan B, Mo S, Nie S, Li Q, Ou Q, Wu B, Jiang G, Tang J, Li N, Jiang C. Carbohydrate metabolism genes dominant in a subtropical marine mangrove ecosystem revealed by metagenomics analysis. J Microbiol. 2019;57:575–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Alzubaidy H, Essack M, Malas TB, Bokhari A, Motwalli O, Kamanu FK, Archer JA. Rhizosphere microbiome metagenomics of gray mangroves (Avicennia marina) in the Red Sea. Gene. 2016;576(2):626–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sanka Loganathachetti D, Sadaiappan B, Poosakkannu A, Muthuraman S. Pyrosequencing-based seasonal observation of prokaryotic diversity in pneumatophore-associated soil of Avicennia marina. Curr Microbiol. 2016;72:68–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fennell DE, Nijenhuis I, Wilson SF, Zinder SH, Häggblom MM. Dehalococcoides ethenogenes strain 195 reductively dechlorinates diverse chlorinated aromatic pollutants. Environ sci Technol. 2004;38(7):2075–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang S, Chng KR, Wilm A, Zhao S, Yang KL, Nagarajan N, He J. Genomic characterization of three unique dehalococcoides that respire on persistent polychlorinated biphenyls. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(33):12103–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Yang Y, Higgins SA, Yan J, Şimşir B, Chourey K, Iyer R, Löffler FE. Grape pomace compost harbors organohalide-respiring Dehalogenimonas species with novel reductive dehalogenase genes. ISME J. 2017;11(12):2767–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Pan Y, Chen J, Zhou H, Farzana S, Tam NF. Vertical distribution of dehalogenating bacteria in mangrove sediment and their potential to remove polybrominated diphenyl ether contamination. Mar Pollut bull. 2017;124(2):1055–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Liang Y, Lu Q, Liang Z, Liu X, Fang W, Liang D, Wang S. Substrate-dependent competition and cooperation relationships between Geobacter and Dehalococcoides for their organohalide respiration. ISME Commun. 2021;1(1):23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Fernandes SO, Bonin PC, Michotey VD, Garcia N, LokaBharathi PA. Nitrogen-limited mangrove ecosystems conserve N through dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium. Sci Rep. 2012;2: 419.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Cao WZ, Yang JX, Li Y, Liu BL, Wang FF, Chang CT. Dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium conserves nitrogen in anthropogenically affected subtropical mangrove sediments in Southeast China. Mar Pollut Bull. 2016;110:155–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Li CH, Wong YS, Tam NFY. Anaerobic biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with amendment of iron (III) in mangrove sediment slurry. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:8083–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Li CH, Zhou HW, Wong YS, Tam NFY. Vertical distribution and anaerobic biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mangrove sediments in Hong Kong, South China. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407:5772–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Andrade LL, Leite DC, Ferreira EM, Ferreira LQ, Paula GR, Maguire MJ, Hubert CR, Peixoto RS, Domingues RM, Rosado AS. Microbial diversity and anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation potential in an oil-contaminated mangrove sediment. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12: 186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Lyu Z, Shao N, Akinyemi T, Whitman WB. Methanogenesis. Curr Biol. 2018;28:R727–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wuebbles DJ, Hayhoe K. Atmospheric methane and global change. Earth Sci Rev. 2002;57:177–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Allen DE, Dalal RC, Rennenberg H, Meyer RL, Reeves S, Schmidt S. Spatial and temporal variation of nitrous oxide and methane flux between subtropical mangrove sediments and the atmosphere. Soil Biol Biochem. 2007;39:622–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Chan OC, Wolf M, Hepperle D, Casper P. Methanogenic archaeal community in the sediment of an artificially partitioned acidic bog lake. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002;42:119–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Futagami T, Goto M, Furukawa K. Biochemical and genetic bases of dehalorespiration. Chem Rec. 2008;8(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Maymó-Gatell X, Nijenhuis I, Zinder SH. Reductive dechlorination of cis-1, 2-dichloroethene and vinyl chloride by “Dehalococcoides ethenogenes”. Environ Sci Technol. 2001;35(3):516–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Wang YF, Zhu HW, Wang Y, Zhang XL, Tam NFY. Diversity and dynamics of microbial community structure in different mangrove, marine and freshwater sediments during anaerobic debromination of PBDEs. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:952.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Chen J, Wang C, Pan Y, Farzana SS, Tam NFY. Biochar accelerates microbial reductive debromination of 2, 2′, 4, 4′-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-47) in anaerobic mangrove sediments. J Hazard Mater. 2018;341:177–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the invaluable contributions of Ms. Jana Wael in editing, language, grammar, and proofreading the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, College of Science, Taibah University, Al-Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Sultan M. Alsharif

  2. Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Mohamed Ismaeil, Ali M. Saeed & Wael S. El-Sayed

Authors
  1. Sultan M. Alsharif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed Ismaeil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali M. Saeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wael S. El-Sayed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.S.E. designed the study. W.S.E. and S.M.A. collected samples and managed the sequencing process. M.I. performed alpha and beta diversity analysis, A.M.S. provided assistance in GC analysis. M.I., S.M.A., A.M.S. and W.S.E. provided input for data interpretation. M.I., S.M.A., and A.M.S. drafted the manuscript, W.S.E. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Ismaeil.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The authors want to change the sequence of the author names in the author list. The sequence of the affiliations should also be changed accordingly.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alsharif, S.M., Ismaeil, M., Saeed, A.M. et al. Metagenomic 16S rRNA analysis and predictive functional profiling revealed intrinsic organohalides respiration and bioremediation potential in mangrove sediment. BMC Microbiol 24, 176 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03291-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03291-8

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us