Skip to main content

Temporal variation in oral microbiome composition of patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation with keratinocyte growth factor



Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is a well-established treatment for lymphoma. Unintended effects of this therapy include oral mucositis (OM) and gastrointestinal toxicities, resulting in poor clinical outcomes. The gut microbiome has been previously linked to transplant toxicities among allogeneic recipients, but little is known about the effects of AHCT on the oral microbiome.


Seven patients with non-Hodgkin or Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing AHCT with palifermin (keratinocyte growth factor) were included. Buccal swab samples were collected at baseline and 14- and 28-days post-treatment. Oral microbial communities were characterized with 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Temporal trends in community composition, alpha diversity, and beta diversity were investigated.


A significant reduction in the relative abundance of the genera Gemella and Actinomyces were observed from baseline. No significant temporal differences in alpha diversity were observed. Significant changes in beta diversity were recorded.


Results of this pilot study suggest treatment with AHCT and palifermin affects the oral microbiome, resulting in temporal shifts in oral microbial community composition. Future studies are warranted to confirm these trends and further investigate the effects of AHCT on the oral microbiome and how these shifts may affect health outcomes.

Peer Review reports


High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is a well-established curative treatment for chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed lymphoma. Patients undergoing AHCT experience regimen-related toxicities, including oral mucositis (OM) and gastrointestinal toxicities, leading to considerable morbidity and high readmission rates with significant impact on clinical and economic outcomes [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Conditioning regimens including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, directly and indirectly affect the mucosa of the digestive tract, leading to OM and other gastrointestinal toxicities, however the effects of those factors on temporal changes in the microbiome during the early transplant period remain largely unknown. Previous studies focused primarily on allogeneic recipients observed an association between the gut microbiome and transplant toxicities, however more evidence suggests the oral microbiome could play an important role in mediating AHCT toxicities and outcomes [1, 6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].

Here we present a pilot study investigating the temporal changes in the oral microbiome of patients undergoing AHCT for lymphoma with the addition of palifermin, a keratinocyte growth factor that is approved to ameliorate OM and other gastrointestinal toxicities in the setting of AHCT [17,18,19,20]. Palifermin was added as a supportive care and quality improvement measure in our center for patients undergoing AHCT for lymphoma in an attempt to decrease regimen-related toxicities and improve outcomes [21]. We hypothesize that mucosal microbial dysbiosis and shifts in microbial community composition occur throughout the AHCT course and may linger without returning to pre-AHCT baseline after hematopoietic recovery from AHCT.


Study design and eligibly

Eligible patients were > 18 years of age, had a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin lymphoma with a plan to undergo AHCT after conditioning with BEAM (busulfan, etoposide, cytosine arabinoside, melphalan). Patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood stem cell graft. There were no early deaths, and all patients were followed up for at least 30 days after AHCT. All patients were on palifermin (60 mcg/kg/day), administered as an intravenous bolus injection for 3 consecutive days before and 3 consecutive days after myelotoxic therapy (two hours after stem cell graft infusion and the two subsequent days 1 and 2), for a total of 6 doses per FDA indication. Patients also received antimicrobial prophylaxis with levofloxacin (250 mg) orally daily and fluconazole (200 mg) orally daily. All patients started fluconazole on the day of start of conditioning (day − 6) and continued through day 60 post-AHCT. Levofloxacin was started on day − 1 through day 14 or later depending on neutrophil recovery (> 1000 cells/microL ) but discontinued before day 21 for all patients. Longitudinal buccal swab samples were collected with a 10-second rotating swab of the left and right buccal mucosa 5 times starting from the upper to the lower jaw with Puritan™ PurFlock™ Ultra Flocked swabs, placed directly in RNAlater vial. Samples were collected at least one hour after a meal. A total of three samples were collected from each patient: prior to AHCT (baseline), 14 days (D14) and 28 days (D28) from the day of hematopoietic cell infusion. The severity of oral mucositis and gastrointestinal toxicities were not prospectively collected for the study period. All participants provided informed consent to participating in this study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Minnesota.

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Swab tips were cut using flame-sterilized scissors and placed into PowerBead tubes (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Bacterial DNA was extracted with QIAGEN DNeasy® PowerSoil® Pro Kit on the automated QIAcube system (inhibitor removal technology protocol), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The V4 hypervariable region of the 16 S rRNA gene was amplified using the 515 F/806R primer set [22]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and dual-indexed, paired-end sequencing (300 nucleotides) were performed by the University of Minnesota Genomics Center (MN, USA) on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) [23]. Negative controls (sterile water) were included in DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing and did not produce amplicons. Sequence data were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRP279100.

Oral microbiome characterization

Sequencing data were processed and analyzed with mothur (v. 1.31.1) [24]. Sequences were trimmed to the first 170 nucleotides. Paired-ends were joined using fastq-join [25] and quality trimmed with 2 nucleotide primer mismatches, no ambiguous bases, homopolymers ≤ 8 nucleotides, and quality scores ≥ 35 over a 50-nucleotide window. For further processing, sequences were aligned against the SILVA database (v. 132) [26, 27]. Errors and chimeric sequences were removed using a 2% pre-cluster and UCHIME (v. 4.2.40) [28, 29]. Individual samples contained between 2 and 9575 high-quality reads. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered at 99% similarity using the furthest-neighbor algorithm, and taxonomic classifications were made against the Ribosomal Database Project (v. 16) [30]. For calculations of diversity, samples were rarified to 1500 reads per sample (range of raw reads among samples included: 3013–17,892), resulting in the removal of five samples (baseline for patient #6 with 185 raw reads, D14 for patients #1, 4, 6, and 7 with 1003, 12, 30, and 31, respectively). Negative controls produced < 20 sequence reads and were removed from the dataset. Alpha diversity (i.e., within-sample diversity) was summarized with the Shannon Index and with the Chao1 Index. Beta diversity (i.e., between-sample diversity) was summarized with Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index. Good’s coverage estimates and diversity calculations were done using mothur.

Statistical analyses

Differences in alpha diversity between the three time-points were investigated with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise differences with simple linear regression models. Beta diversity was explored with principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and evaluated statistically using analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) [31]. Differences in alpha diversity and abundances of taxa were evaluated using ANOVA (parametric) or Kruskal-Wallis (non-parametric), depending on the distribution of the data. All statistics were evaluated at α = 0.05, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.


We enrolled 7 patients with median age of 63 years (range 26–75), 5 males and 2 females, one with a diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma and 6 with NHL (Table 1). Mean estimated Good’s coverage across all samples was 98.6 ± 1.6%. The mean Shannon Index was lowest at baseline (mean ± SD = 1.84 ± 0.62), followed by D14 (1.93 ± 0.57) and D28 (2.66 ± 0.70), but differences were not significant (ANOVA p-value = 0.093; Fig. 1). Similarly, the Chao1 index was also lowest at baseline (60.88 ± 32.74), followed by D14 (83.77 ± 51.98), and D28 (126.03 ± 136.45), but differences were not significant (ANOVA p-value = 0.493).

Table 1 Patient demographic and pre-transplant clinical characteristics for 7 US patients with non-Hodgkin or Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in 2020
Fig. 1
figure 1

Spaghetti plot of Shannon indices for each patient

Overall shifts in microbial community composition were observed from baseline to post-treatment time points. The mean relative abundances across all time-points are shown in Fig. 2. We evaluated whether differences among the predominant taxa (those shown in Fig. 2) differed by time. Across all time-points, microbial communities were predominantly composed of the genera Streptococcus and Veillonella. For most participants (4/7), the relative abundance of Streptococcus decreased from baseline (mean = 55.0%) to D14 (mean = 28.3%), rebounding by D28 (mean = 36.0%) post-AHCT; these trends were not statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.255). Genera Gemella and Actinomyces were most altered by AHCT procedures. The relative abundance of Gemella was significantly greater at baseline (mean = 9.8%) compared to D14 (mean = 0.7%; p = 0.012) and remained low at D28 (mean = 0.9%; p = 0.041). The relative abundance of Actinomyces also decreased significantly from baseline (mean = 2.8%) to D14 (mean = 0.5%; p = 0.020), but recovered by D28 (mean = 2.0%, p > 0.05). Less abundant taxa were not interrogated due to data sparsity and a small number of samples that limited statistical analyses. An overall difference in community composition was observed across the three time points (ANOSIM R = 0.216, p = 0.028; Fig. 3); however, pairwise comparisons were not significant. A higher dissimilarity index was observed between the baseline and D14 samples (ANOSIM R = 0.556, p = 0.032; Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.017) than between the baseline and D28 samples (ANOSIM R = 0.135, p = 0.086).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Average relative abundances of predominant genera at baseline and post-AHCT (14 and 28 days)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) plot of Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity (Beta Diversity)


This pilot prospective study investigated the temporal changes in the oral microbiome of patients with lymphoma undergoing AHCT and treated with palifermin, added for mucosal cytoprotection. We observed that significant shifts in microbial community composition from baseline to D14 and D28 post-treatment, marked by reduction in Gemella and Actinomyces and a trend of decrease in Streptococcus from baseline to D14, followed by an increase by D28. While we noted no significant temporal differences in alpha (i.e., within-sample) diversity similar to previous reports, notable changes in beta (i.e., between-sample) diversity were recorded [1]. These results suggest that AHCT procedures with the use of high dose chemotherapy and antimicrobials are associated with temporal shifts in microbial community composition that persist beyond day 28 without returning to pre-treatment baselines despite the use of an oral cytoprotectant. Additionally, we hypothesize that the use of palifermin might explain the observed changes in beta diversity in this pilot study. We suspect that no significant differences in alpha diversity were observed due to a lack D14 samples with sufficient sequencing depth to include. Notably, all patients with a complete sample series tended to see an increase in Shannon index, although baseline and D28 Shannon indices were similar for the other three patients (Fig. 1).

Our observations have potentially unique clinical implications. Streptococcus and Gemella have been previously reported to dominate the oral microbial community in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy exposure [32], while in patients undergoing AHCT for multiple myeloma, Streptococcus increased one week post-transplant followed by a subsequent decrease [1]. Our findings could potentially be explained by the prophylactic use of levofloxacin leading to decreased abundance of susceptible bacteria with effects that persist beyond the stop date and are organism dependent. It must be noted, however, that the impact of this medication on the gut microbiome has been previously characterized as mild [33], with its effects on the oral microbiome yet to be assessed. A study examining the oral microbiome in those with lymphoma or multiple myeloma undergoing AHCT noted an association between the decrease in Shannon diversity and the severity of oral mucositis [8]. Additionally, differences in our findings compared to other transplant cohorts [1] may be due to a different patient population, with different underlying diseases, treatment and conditioning regimen. This could be at least partially explained by the addition of palifermin in our cohort, as palifermin enhances the thickness of the oral mucosa epithelium and may impact niches of microorganisms. Oral dysbiosis is a reflection of multiple factors in this patient population including exposure to chemotherapy, antimicrobials and other medications that can have direct and indirect effects on the microbiome [34,35,36,37]. Our findings could support the hypothesis that peri-transplant OM associated changes in bacteriome are dominated by depletion of the most common oral commensals including Streptococcus, Actinomyces and Gemella [34]; although we have not objectively documented the severity of OM in this study, conditioning before AHCT is known to be clinically associated with some degree of OM in all patients. A previous study in patients undergoing AHCT for multiple myeloma noted that changes in oral microbial composition were more pronounced in those developing oral ulcers peri-transplant [12]. As noted in a prior study [28], compositional changes could not be attributed to the direct effects of the therapy, but rather reflected pro-inflammatory changes resembling other oral diseases. Changes in oral bacteria community composition and diversity have been linked to several oral and extra-oral outcomes, including infections, cardiometabolic disease, and recurring or new malignancies [38,39,40,41]. The associations between oral microbiome changes and risk of bacteremia, mucositis, and immune reconstruction remain uncharacterized, and our findings could assist in investigating this phenomenon and its effects on health.

This study has several noteworthy limitations. Firstly, due to the compositional nature of microbiome data, any observed changes in relative abundance of a given taxon are relative to the total abundance captured in the sample and thus may not be reflective of absolute changes in the microbiome or its biomass. Low microbial biomass in samples led to insufficient sequence results obtained, and the removal of 5 samples from some analyses. Due to this small sample size, the generalizability of our study and our ability to adjust for confounders was limited, further exacerbating the effects of confounding biases, as is the case with any observational study. However, due to the temporal nature of sampling, confounding due to non-time varying characteristics of the patients is less likely to be at play. Additionally, the direct effect of palifermin addition on the temporal changes in microbiome composition and diversity are not clear without a comparative cohort. Future investigations are warranted to further investigate our findings in a larger patient population, ideally comparing those changes to patients with similar disease and transplant characteristics not receiving palifermin. This pilot study serves as an important first step towards understanding the effects of AHCT with palifermin on the oral microbiome, uniquely reporting on longitudinal dynamic changes in oral microbiome composition in this patient population.

Data availability

Raw sequence data are available under SRA accession number SRP279100.


  1. El Jurdi N, Filali-Mouhim A, Salem I, Retuerto M, Dambrosio NM, Baer L et al. Gastrointestinal Microbiome and Mycobiome Changes during Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Prospective Pilot Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant [Internet]. 2019 Aug 1 [cited 2020 Apr 25];25(8):1511–9. Available from:

  2. Sonis ST, Oster G, Fuchs H, Bellm L, Bradford WZ, Edelsberg J et al. Oral mucositis and the clinical and economic outcomes of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2001 Apr 15 [cited 2020 Apr 24];19(8):2201–5. Available from:

  3. Bellm LA, Epstein JB, Rose-Ped A, Martin P, Fuchs HJ. Patient reports of complications of bone marrow transplantation. Support Care Cancer. 2000;8(1):33–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McGuire DB, Altomonte V, Peterson DE, Wingard JR, Jones RJ, Grochow LB. Patterns of mucositis and pain in patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1993;20(10):1493–502.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Woo S-B, Sonis ST, Monopoli MM, Sonis AL. A longitudinal study of oral ulcerative mucositis in bone marrow transplant recipients. Cancer. 1993;72(5):1612–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shouval R, Eshel A, Dubovski B, Kuperman AA, Danylesko I, Fein JA, et al. Patterns of salivary microbiota injury and oral mucositis in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood Adv. 2020;4(13):2912–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohbayashi Y, Imataki O, Uemura M, Takeuchi A, Aoki S, Tanaka M, et al. Oral microorganisms and bloodstream infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(7):4359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee A, Hong J, Shin D-Y, Koh Y, Yoon S-S, Kim P-J et al. Association of HSV-1 and reduced oral bacteriota diversity with Chemotherapy-Induced oral mucositis in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4).

  9. Oku S, Takeshita T, Futatsuki T, Kageyama S, Asakawa M, Mori Y, et al. Disrupted tongue microbiota and detection of nonindigenous bacteria on the day of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(3):e1008348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. de Molla VC, Heidrich V, Bruno JS, Knebel FH, Miranda-Silva W, Asprino PF, et al. Disruption of the oral microbiota is associated with a higher risk of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):17552.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ames NJ, Sulima P, Ngo T, Barb J, Munson PJ, Paster BJ, et al. A characterization of the oral microbiome in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10):e47628.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Laheij AMGA, Raber-Durlacher JE, Koppelmans RGA, Huysmans MCDNJM, Potting C, van Leeuwen SJM et al. Microbial changes in relation to oral mucositis in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1).

  13. Laheij AMGA, de Soet JJ, von dem Borne PA, Kuijper EJ, Kraneveld EA, van Loveren C, et al. Oral bacteria and yeasts in relationship to oral ulcerations in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(12):3231–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Weber D, Frauenschläger K, Ghimire S, Peter K, Panzer I, Hiergeist A et al. The association between acute graft-versus-host disease and antimicrobial peptide expression in the gastrointestinal tract after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Palaniyandi S, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2017 Sep 21 [cited 2021 Jan 13];12(9):e0185265.

  15. Sen T, Thummer RP. The impact of human microbiotas in hematopoietic stem cell and organ transplantation. Front Immunol. 2022;13:932228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Badia P, Andersen H, Haslam D, Nelson AS, Pate AR, Golkari S, et al. Improving oral health and modulating the oral Microbiome to reduce bloodstream infections from oral organisms in Pediatric and Young Adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020;26(9):1704–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Herbers AHE, van der Velden WJFM, de Haan AFJ, Donnelly JP, Blijlevens NMA. Impact of palifermin on intestinal mucositis of HSCT recipients after BEAM. Bone Marrow Transplant [Internet]. 2014 Jan [cited 2020 Apr 9];49(1):8–10. Available from:

  18. Stiff PJ, Emmanouilides C, Bensinger WI, Gentile T, Blazar B, Shea TC et al. Palifermin reduces patient-reported mouth and throat soreness and improves patient functioning in the hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation setting. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2006 Nov 20 [cited 2020 Apr 9];24(33):5186–93. Available from:

  19. Spielberger R, Stiff P, Bensinger W, Gentile T, Weisdorf D, Kewalramani T, et al. Palifermin for oral mucositis after intensive therapy for hematologic cancers. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2590–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vadhan-Raj S, Goldberg JD, Perales MA, Berger DP, van den Brink MRM. Clinical applications of palifermin: amelioration of oral mucositis and other potential indications. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17(11):1371–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. El Jurdi N, Fair C, Rogosheske J, Shanley R, Arora M, Bachanova V, et al. Effect of keratinocyte growth factor on Hospital Readmission and Regimen-Related toxicities after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for Lymphoma. Transpl Cell Ther. 2021;27(2):179e1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012;6(8):1621–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gohl DM, Vangay P, Garbe J, MacLean A, Hauge A, Becker A, et al. Systematic improvement of amplicon marker gene methods for increased accuracy in microbiome studies. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(9):942–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(23):7537–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Aronesty E. Comparison of sequencing Utility Programs. Open Bioinforma J. 2013;7(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(21):7188–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Schloss PD, Westcott SL. Assessing and improving methods used in operational taxonomic unit-based approaches for 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(10):3219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Huse SM, Welch DM, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12(7):1889–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(16):2194–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, et al. The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D141–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. CLARKE KR. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Austral Ecol. 1993;18(1):117–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Napeñas JJ, Brennan MT, Coleman S, Kent ML, Noll J, Frenette G, et al. Molecular methodology to assess the impact of cancer chemotherapy on the oral bacterial flora: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(4):554–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rashidi A, Kaiser T, Graiziger C, Holtan SG, Tauseef •, Rehman U et al. Specific gut microbiota changes heralding bloodstream infection and neutropenic fever during intensive chemotherapy. Leukemia [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Jun 20];

  34. Hong B-Y, Sobue T, Choquette L, Dupuy AK, Thompson A, Burleson JA, et al. Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis is associated with detrimental bacterial dysbiosis. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Maier L, Pruteanu M, Kuhn M, Zeller G, Telzerow A, Anderson EE, et al. Extensive impact of non-antibiotic drugs on human gut bacteria. Nature. 2018;555(7698):623–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Jensen SB, Mouridsen HT, Reibel J, Brünner N, Nauntofte B. Adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients induces temporary salivary gland hypofunction. Oral Oncol. 2008;44(2):162–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Marsh PD, Do T, Beighton D, Devine DA. Influence of saliva on the oral microbiota. Periodontol 2000. 2016;70(1):80–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Verma D, Garg PK, Dubey AK. Insights into the human oral microbiome. Arch Microbiol. 2018;200(4):525–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wade WG. The oral microbiome in health and disease. Pharmacol Res. 2013;69(1):137–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Krishnan K, Chen T, Paster BJ. A practical guide to the oral microbiome and its relation to health and disease. Oral Dis. 2017;23(3):276–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Irfan M, Delgado RZR, Frias-Lopez J. The oral Microbiome and Cancer. Front Immunol. 2020;11:591088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


Sequence data were processed, analyzed, and stored using resources from the Minnesota Supercomputing Institute and Research Computing (UMN). We would like to acknowledge Michael Franklin, MS, for assistance in editing this manuscript.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



B.B., C.S, and N.E.J wrote the main manuscript. B.B. and C.S. conducted the analyses and prepared figures. All authors (B.B., M.C., C.S., S.H., J.M., V.B., N.E.J.) reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bruno Bohn or Najla El Jurdi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants provided informed consent to participating in this study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board from the University of Minnesota. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest directly relevant to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bohn, B., Chalupova, M., Staley, C. et al. Temporal variation in oral microbiome composition of patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation with keratinocyte growth factor. BMC Microbiol 23, 258 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Hematopoietic cell transplantation
  • Oral microbiome
  • Autologous