Skip to main content
Download PDF

Diversity and antimicrobial activities of culturable actinomycetes from Odontotermes formosanus (Blattaria: Termitidae)

BMC Microbiology volume 22, Article number: 80 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Actinomycetes are important microbes, and they are very important for developing active substances for useful drugs. Actinomycetes are numerous inhabitants, and they are widely distributed in the nest of fungus-growing termites. Previously, we isolated and purified numerous actinomycetes from the combs of Odontotermes formosanus and obtained a variety of valuable natural products.

Results

Here, we isolated and purified actinomycetes from fungus-growing termite Odontotermes formosanus using medium-based cultures. Among the eight media tested, M7 and I-HV media were found suitable for isolating actinomycetes. Further, 84 actinomycetes, including 79 Streptomyces isolates, were isolated and purified from O. formosanus and its combs, which belong to four genera (Streptomyces, Kribbella, Amycolatopsis, and Cellulosimicrobium). Then, the type and quantity of actinomycetes were positively correlated with the activity range of termites. Twenty-two actinomycetes strains showed antimicrobial activities. Among them, the BYF18, BYF48, BYF70, and BYF106 strains exhibited antifungal activities against five pathogenic fungi, with zone of inhibition (ZOI) values ranging from 3 to 21 mm. Grincamycin N was isolated and purified from the metabolites of Streptomyces lannensis (BYF106), and it displayed antibacterial activities against Staphylococcus aureus (ZOI = 13.82 ± 0.52 mm) and Micrococcus tetragenus (ZOI = 17.6 ± 0.5 mm) (gentamycin sulfate, as the positive control, had ZOI values of 19.9 ± 0.5 mm and 30.83 ± 0.75 mm, against S. aureus and M. tetragenus, respectively).

Conclusions

Our results confirmed that the actinomycetes associated with O. formosanus are important sources of new active substances.

Peer Review reports

Background

Microorganisms are important sources of natural products, and they have great potential for application in medical, chemical, and agricultural industries [1]. For example, actinomycetes produce a wide variety of valuable natural products, including alkaloids, flavonoids, quinones, and peptides, which show diverse biological activities [2, 3]. Many antibiotics and pesticide ingredients are derived from actinomycetes [4, 5]. However, as more natural products are isolated and extracted from microorganisms inhabiting the aquatic, soil, and other common environments, there is a decrease in the probability of discovering new species and compounds.

Insects are by far the most diverse and abundant animal clade on earth, in terms of both the number of species and biomass [6]. They are tenacious and coexist with various microorganisms [7]. The microorganisms associated with insects are also diverse because of the complexity and diversity of their habitats and diets of their insect partners [8]. Thus, there is still a possibility of identifying new species and isolating new natural products from insect-related microorganisms [9]. Insect-related actinomycetes are important microbes and are very important for the development of active substances for new drugs [10, 11].

The fungus-growing termite Odontotermes formosanus (Blattaria: Termitidae) is abundantly found and is widely distributed in Asia and Africa [12]. It is a typical social insect with different grades, such as king, queen, workers, and soldiers, in its communities. All termites live in the stable environment of the nest, where there is a clear social division of labour. The king and queen are responsible for reproduction, soldiers are responsible for protecting the nest, and workers are responsible for collecting food, building the nest, and cultivating combs [13]. Actinomycetes are potential defensive symbionts of fungus-growing termites, because they produce antibiotic substances and are known to play the role of defensive microbes in other insect-fungus symbioses [14]. In our previous research, we isolated 23 strains of actinomycetes from the nests of O. formosanus and purified a compound (actinomycin D) with antifungal activity [10]. Here, we aim to assess the diversity and antimicrobial activity of actinomycetes isolated from body surfaces and guts of O. formosanus as well as the combs, through strain isolation, paired bioassay, chemical activity and identification.

Results

Isolation of actinomycetes strains

Actinomycetes strains were isolated from body surfaces and guts of O. formosanus as well as the combs. According to the distinct morphological features of actinomycetes and colors of secondary metabolites, 84 actinomycetes strains, including 27, 27, 10, 7, 7, and 6 isolates from M7, I-HV, M1, M2, HV, and M3 media, were isolated. No strains were isolated from ISP2 and ISP3 media (Fig. 1A). Among these, 68 isolates were obtained from the termite’s body surfaces, including 32, 28, and 8 isolates from soldiers, workers, and queen, respectively. Further, 9 and 7 isolates were obtained from combs and guts of workers, respectively. No isolates were obtained from the king or guts of the O. formosanus soldiers, king, or queen (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Actinomycetes were isolated from O. formosanus and combs. A Different isolation media. B Different isolation parts. Note: (i) No actinomycetes were isolated from ISP2 and ISP3 media; (ii) No actinomycetes were isolated from the king; (iii) No actinomycetes were isolated from the guts of O. formosanus, except those of the workers

Full size image

Identification and phylogenetic analysis of actinomycetes strains

The 16S rRNA identification was amplified from 84 actinomycetes isolates. Of these isolates, 79 were identified as Streptomyces, which belong to 19 species, 2 were identified as Kribbella shirazensis, 2 were identified as Amycolatopsis sp., and 1 was identified as Cellulosimicrobium funkei (Fig. 2). Kribbella shirazensis was isolated from the body surfaces of soldiers and queen. Amycolatopsis sp. was only isolated from the body surfaces of soldiers, and Cellulosimicrobium funkei was only isolated from the body surfaces of workers (Table S2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Maximum-likelihood tree based on the 16S rRNA sequences obtained from actinomycetes associated with O. formosanus and combs. The Tamura-Nei + G (T92 + G) model was used with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap values are shown at the nodes. Black: Streptomyces; Purple: Amycolatopsis; Blue: Cellulosimicrobium; Red: Kribbella

Full size image

A total of 75 actinomycetes isolates were obtained from O. formosanus and were identified as 19 different species, including 14, 10, and 7 species isolated from workers, soldiers, and queen, respectively. Moreover, 9 actinomycetes isolates were isolated from the comb and identified as 6 actinomycetes species (Fig. 3, Table S2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Venn diagram analysis of actinomycetes species isolated from O. formosanus and combs

Full size image

Exhibition of antifungal activity against pathogenic microbes by the isolated actinomycetes

To explore the antifungal activity of isolated strains, all isolates were challenged with various pathogenic microbes. Twenty-two Streptomyces isolates exhibited antifungal activity against pathogenic microbes.

Among these, 10, 6, 4, and 2 isolates were obtained from workers, soldiers, comb, and queen, respectively. Overall, these Streptomyces isolates showed strongest antifungal activity against A. solani, with zone of inhibition (ZOI) values greater than 20 mm (BYF74: ZOI = 21.9 ± 5.3 mm and BYF106: ZOI = 20.4 ± 0.5 mm), followed by C. clavata (BYF48: ZOI = 18.3 ± 1.6 mm), C. lunata (BYF70: ZOI = 16.3 ± 0.6 mm), C. graminicola (BYF48: ZOI = 12.0 ± 1.1 mm), and F. oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum (BYF106: ZOI = 5.3 ± 0.6 mm) (Table 1).

Table 1 ZOI values of actinomycetes against growth of  plant pathogenic fungi (mm) (mean ± S.E.M., n = 3)
Full size table

Sixteen Streptomyces isolates showed inhibitory activity against two or more plant fungi (Table 1). Four Streptomyces isolates, BYF18, BYF48, BYF70, and BYF106, exhibited antifungal activity against all tested pathogenic fungi, with ZOI values ranging from 3 to 20 mm (Fig. 4A). Because the fermentation product yield of the BYF106 strain was higher than that of the BYF48 and BYF70 strains, we chose the BYF106 strain for an in-depth study. Meanwhile, according to the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the BYF106 strain formed a cluster with Streptomyces lannensis type strain TA4-8. Thus, the BYF106 strain was Streptomyces lannensis (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Antifungal activity of Streptomyces BYF18, BYF48, BYF70, and BYF106 against five  plant pathogens (A); Phylogenetic (ML) analysis of BYF106 (B). The Tamura-Nei + G (T92 + G) model was used with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap values are shown at the nodes. Streptomyces megasporus DSM 41476 T was used an outgroup

Full size image

Exhibited antimicrobial activities of fermentation broth of BYF106

An extract from the fermentation broth of BYF106 showed antifungal activity against nine pathogenic fungi, with the highest inhibition rates at 48 h of fermentation (Table 2). Further, the inhibition rates of the BYF106 fermentation broth for B. cinerea and C. graminicola were up to 93% and 87%, respectively. It also showed good inhibitory activity against A. solani, F. graminearum, C. lunata, and C. clavata, with inhibition rates of more than 55%. Unfortunately, it had low antifungal activity against three Fusarium oxysporum species, with inhibition rates ranging from 29.81% ± 3.15% to 40.19% ± 3.12% (Fig. 5).

Table 2 Inhibition rates (%) of the crude extract of BYF106 against growth of nine pathogenic fungi (mean ± S.E.M., n = 3)
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Inhibition rates (%) of the crude extract of BYF106 against growth of nine pathogenic fungi at 48 h of fermentation. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. Note: momordicae, cucumerinum, and vasinfectum refer to Fusarium oxysporum. f. sp. momordicae, Fusarium oxysporum. f. sp. Cucumerinum, and Fusarium oxysporum. f. sp. vasinfectum, respectively

Full size image

Structural elucidation of bioactive metabolites from BYF106

Two compounds, BYF106-1 and BYF106-2, were isolated from the BYF106 fermentation broth. The chemical structures of BYF106-1 and BYF106-2  were shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Compounds BYF106-1 and BYF106-2 isolated from the culture of actinomycetes BYF106. a: BYF106-1, grincamycin N (C31H27O10); b: BYF106-2, fridamycin D (C31H32O12)

Full size image

Compound BYF106-1 (grincamycin N) was obtained as a red powder, and its molecular formula, C31H27O10, was deduced from an ESI–MS ion peak at m/z 559.1604[M-H]−. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR data were as follows: 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ1.25 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, H-6″), 1.27(3H, d, J = 5.9 Hz, H-6’), 2.40 (3H, s, H-13), 3.51 (1H, t, J = 9.1 Hz, H-4’), 3.60 (2H, m, H-2’), 3.85 (1H, m, H-3’), 4.35 (1H, m, H-2″), 4.72 (1H, m, H-5″), 4.94 (1H, d, J = 11.2 Hz, H-1’), 5.23 (1H, d, J = 2.3 Hz, H-1″), 6.94 (1H, s, H-9), 7.50 (1H, s, H-7), 7.74 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, H-4), 7.85 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, H-3), 8.38 (1H, s, H-11), 10.88 (1H, s, HO-10), 13.40 (1H, s, HO-6); and 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ158.40 (C, C-1), 136.31 (C,C-2), 133.20 (CH, C-3), 118.33 (CH, C-4), 132.41 (C, C-4a), 186.21 (C, C-5), 108.71 (C,C-5a), 162.12 (C, C-6), 128.15 (C, C-6a), 114.22 (CH, C-7), 141.77 (C, C-8), 116.23 (CH, C-9), 155.89 (C, C-10), 124.10 (C, C-10a), 116.72 (CH, C-11), 125.02 (C, C-11a), 187.21 (C, C-12), 116.14 (C, C-12a), 21.85 (CH3, C-13), 70.55 (CH, C-1’), 35.84 (CH2, C-2’), 75.74 (CH, C-3’), 73.52 (CH, C-4’), 73.66 (CH, C-5’), 17.37 (CH3, C-6’), 90.46 (CH, C-1″), 70.86 (CH, C-2″), 40.05 (CH2, C-3″), 208.56 (C, C-4″), 76.91 (CH,C-5″), 16.05 (CH3, C-6″). These data were almost identical to those reported for grincamycin N (C31H27O10) [15].

Compound BYF106-2 (fridamycin D) was obtained as a yellow powder, and its molecular formula, C31H32O12, was deduced from ESI–MS m/z 597.1971 [M-H]+. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR data were as follows: 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ1.19 (3H, s, H-15), 1.25 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, H-6″), 1.27 (3H, d, J = 5.9 Hz, H-6’), 1.63 (1H, m, H-2’), 2.41 (2H, s, H-13), 2.47 (1H, t, J = 13.9 Hz, H-3’’), 2.51 (1H, m, H-2’), 2.91 (1H, t, J = 13.4 Hz, H-3″), 3.06 (1H, d, J = 13.1 Hz, H-11), 3.51 (1H, t, J = 9.2 Hz, H-4’), 3.86 (1H, m, H-3’), 4.34 (1H, m, H-2’’), 4.71 (1H, dd, J = 6.72 Hz, 6.73 Hz, H-5’’), 5.01 (1H, d, J = 10.9 Hz, H-1’), 5.22 (1H, d, J = 2.6 Hz, H-1’’), 7.74 (1H, t, J = 7.7 Hz, H-9), 7.82 (1H, t, J = 6.8 Hz, H-4), 7.92 (1H, s, H-3), 7.93 (1H, s, H-8); and 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ158.0 (C, C-1), 137.0 (C, C-2), 133.6 (CH, C-3), 118.8 (CH, C-4), 131.9 (C, C-4a), 187.8 (C, C-5), 115.0 (C, C-5a), 169.6 (C, C-6), 135.2 (C, C-7), 139.7 (CH, C-8), 118.3 (CH, C-9), 131.0 (C, C-9a), 187.8 (C, C-10), 115.4 (C, C-10a), 39.6 (CH2, C-11), 71.0 (C, C-12), 46.3 (CH2, C-13), 172.4 (COOH, C-14), 26.4 (CH3, C-15), 70.4 (CH, C-1’), 35.8 (CH2, C-2’), 75.7 (CH, C-3’), 73.5 (CH, C-4’), 23.6 (CH, C-5’), 17.3 (CH3, C-6’), 90.4 (CH, C-1″), 70.8 (CH, C-2″), 39.7 (CH2, C-3″), 208.7 (C, C-4″), 76.9 (CH, C-5″), 16.0 (CH3, C-6″). These data were almost identical to those reported for fridamycin D (C31H32O12) [16].

Anti-bacterial activities of BYF106-1 and BYF106-2

Compounds BYF106-1 and BYF106-2 showed significant differences in their anti-bacterial activities against S. aureus and M. tetragenus. The ZOI value against S. aureus was significantly higher for BYF106-1 than for BYF106-2 (BYF106-1: 13.82 ± 0.52 mm vs. BYF106-2: 9.91 ± 0.31 mm, P < 0.05; gentamycin sulfate positive control: ZOI = 19.9 ± 0.5 mm). The ZOI value against M. tetragenus was also significantly higher for BYF106-1 than for BYF106-2 (BYF106-1: 17.6 ± 0.5 mm vs. BYF106-2: 10.7 ± 0.7 mm, P < 0.05; gentamycin sulfate positive control: ZOI = 30.83 ± 0.75 mm) (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Zone of inhibition values of two compounds against two pathogenic bacteria (A, B). Values are the mean of three independent measurements ± S.E.M. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Positive control was 30 µg gentamicin sulfate/filter paper (titer: USP grade, > 590 U/mg). Red pill: BYF106-1; Yellow pill: BYF106-2; White pill: gentamicin sulfate

Full size image

Discussion

To obtain a wide range of actinomycetes, we used eight different media to isolate microbes from O. formosanus and fungus combs. We found that M7 and I-HV media were the most efficient for isolation of actinomycetes. We speculate that chitin in the M7 medium effectively inhibited the growth of some bacteria and fungi, while favoring the growth of actinomycetes, since they are known to fully absorb and utilize this substrate [17]. Starch is the only carbon source in the I-HV medium, and it favors mycelial extension and cell growth of actinomycetes. A medium containing amylase with starch as a delayed carbon source is suitable for bacteria that utilize starch, including oligotrophic actinomycetes [18].

Pathogens are widely distributed in the soil. Soil-dwelling insects must overcome challenges arising from pathogens in the soil [19]. A key strategy of insects coping with environmental threats is the use of molecular defenses from symbiotic microbes, especially from insect-associated Streptomyces [20]. In this study, 84 actinomycetes strains were isolated from O. formosanus and its combs, and most of the isolates were Streptomyces spp. Significantly, majority of these isolates were isolated from the body surface of O. formosanus. This indicated that O. formosanus-associated actinomycetes are probably derived from the surrounding soil.

In the world of fungus-growing termites, all termites live in the stable environment of the nest, where there is a clear social division of labor. The king and queen are responsible for reproduction, soldiers protect the nest, and workers are responsible for collecting food, building the nest, and cultivating crops (Termitomyces genus) in fungus combs [13]. Hence, the workers and soldiers, which have a wide range of activities in the soil, are more vulnerable to pathogens. This can explain why majority of the isolates were obtained from workers (14 isolates) and soldiers (12 isolates). This can also explain why no actinomycetes were isolated from the king, which has a limited range of activities and a much smaller body than the queen.

Antifungal tests showed that many Streptomyces isolates, such as BYF106 and BYF74, exhibited positive antifungal activity, and they had ZOI values greater than 20 mm against A. solani. Four strains showed inhibitory activity against five plant pathogenic fungi (ZOI values ranging from 3 to 20 mm), which reflected their broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. This result indicated that actinomycetes produce a variety of compounds, rather than a single compound, to antagonize specific pathogenic fungi. BYF106 and BYF48 strains also showed antifungal activity against four plant pathogenic fungi (ZOI values > 10 mm), indicating that actinomycetes associated with O. formosanus have great potential as sources of new active substances. The monomer compounds BYF106-1 (grincamycin N) and BYF106-2 (fridamycin D) produced by S. lannensis (BYF106) also showed inhibitory activity against two human pathogens. Thus, BYF106-1 also can be developed as an active substance.

Conclusion

We found that culturable actinomycetes were mainly distributed on the body surfaces of O. formosanus, and the distribution of actinomycetes was affected by the termite’s role in the nest. Most of the isolated actinomycetes were Streptomyces, and many of them are known to have antimicrobial activity. Grincamycin N, a monomer compound with significant antibacterial activity, was isolated from the fermentation broth of BYF106. Our results highlight that actinomycetes associated with O. formosanus are good sources of new active compounds.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

The samples were collected in sterile petri dishes from the Jiangyin City, Jiangsu Province, China (31°55′N, 120°17′E).

Nine different phytopathogenic fungi, Alternaria solani, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium graminearum, Curvularia clavata, Curvularia lunata, Colletotrichum graminicola, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum, and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. momordicae, and three pathogenic bacteria, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Micrococcus tetragenus, were obtained from the Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province, China (29°1′N, 119°6′E).

Sample preparation

In total, 20 workers, 20 soldiers, 1 king, and 1 queen were removed from a freshly excavated termite nest and were separately placed in 10.0-mL sterile micro-centrifuge tubes for processing. Next, they were washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer (pH 7.4) (consisting of 0.27 g KH2PO4, 1.42 g of Na2HPO4, 8 g of NaCl, and 0.2 g of KCl in 1L of distilled water) to obtain rinse solutions. Then, they were dissected under sterile conditions to obtain the whole guts, which were ground using sterile mortars to produce gut slurries. In addition, fungus combs (4 g) were ground and treated using four separate methods to obtain slurries. The following four methods were used: (i) 1 g of fungus comb was heated at 120 °C for 1 h before adding the 10 mL PBS buffer (pH 7.4); (ii) 1 g of fungus comb was subjected to microwave heating (120 W, 2,450 Hz) for 9 min before adding the 10 mL PBS buffer (pH 7.4); (iii), 1 g of fungus comb in 10 mL of 1.5% phenol was placed in a 30 °C water bath for 30 min; and (iv) 1 g of fungus comb in 10 mL of 0.05% SDS was placed in a 40 °C water bath for 20 min [21].

Isolation and identification of actinomycetes

Actinomycetes were isolated by the serial dilution method using eight different media, M1, M2, M3, M7, HV, I-HV, ISP2, and ISP3, supplemented with 75 mg/L nystatin, 25 mg/L naphthyridinic acid, and 50 mg/L potassium dichromate (Table S1). The inoculated plates were incubated at 28 °C and were observed intermittently for the growth of actinomycetes.

Actinomycetes with distinct morphological features were selected for culture. Total genome DNA was extracted from samples using a Plant Genomic DNA kit (TIANGEN, China). All PCR reactions were carried out on an ABI Veriti thermocycler (USA) and using Phusion® High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs) and the specific primer pair 27F (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′)-1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′).

The 50-µL PCR reaction mixture contained 20.5 µL ddH2O, 25 µL Premix Taq (LA Taq Version 2.0), 2.5 µL DNA template, 1 µL 27F, and 1 µL 1492R. PCR was performed under the following conditions: 98 °C for 3 min, followed by 32 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 56 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 90 s, followed by 72 °C for 7 min and 16 °C for 4 min. The same volume of 1 × loading buffer (containing SYBR green) was mixed with PCR amplicons and electrophoresis was conducted on 1.2% agarose gels for amplicon detection. The products were sent to the General Biosystems Limited Company (Anhui, China) for sequencing, and the results were used for BLAST analysis and Ezbiocloud sequence alignment to construct the phylogenetic trees.

For phylogenetic reconstructions, the nucleotide substitution model determined by the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) value calculated by MEGA X software. The substitution model was Tamura 3-parameter and gamma distributed (G) (T92 + G) with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The sequences of the 16 s rRNA gene of all test actinomycetes isolates were deposited in GenBank (accession number: MT498694-778).

Screening for antifungal activities

The antifungal screening bioassay of actinomycetes isolates against phytopathogenic fungi was carried out by the disc diffusion method [22]. We used five different phytopathogenic fungi, A. solani, C. clavata, C. lunata, C. graminicola, and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum as the test strains. The test pathogenic fungi were inoculated onto the centers of the potato dextrose agar (PDA) plate (Table S1) and then incubated in the dark at 28℃. Actinomycetes isolates were grown on Gause’s synthetic agar (Table S1) and then incubated in the dark at 28℃. When the soil-borne pathogenic fungi and actinomycetes were full of plates, a punch (6 mm) was used to obtain phytopathogenic fungi and actinomycetes cakes. Actinomycetes cakes were inoculated onto the edges were grown on the malt extract agar (MEA) medium (Table S1) and then incubated in the dark at 28℃. After 2 days of culture, the cakes of pathogenic fungi were inoculated onto the center of MEA media and then incubated in the dark at 28℃ for 3 days, and the diameter of the bacteriostatic circle with inhibitory activity was measured and recorded.

Microbial fermentation of the BYF106 strain

Microbial fermentation of actinomycetes BYF106 was performed as described [23]. The slant culture of the BYF106 strain was inoculated in 150 mL Gause’s liquid medium in a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask, with shaking at 180 rpm for 2 days at 28 °C. Afterwards, the inoculum was transferred as seeds into a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 150 mL of Gause’s liquid medium and grown at 28 °C at an agitation speed of 180 rpm for 10 days.

Screening antimicrobial activities of BYF106 crude extracts

Crude pastes of the target strains (100 µg/mL) were screened for their antimicrobial activities. We used nine different phytopathogenic fungi, A. solani, B. cinerea, F. graminearum, C. clavata, C. lunata, C. graminicola, F. oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum, F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum, and F. oxysporum f. sp. momordicae.

The in vitro antifungal activities against phytopathogenic fungi were assayed using the growth rate method with slight modifications [24, 25]. Gentamycin sulfate was used as the positive control. The test pathogenic fungi were inoculated onto the centers of plates containing different media and then incubated in the dark at 28℃. When fungal mycelia reached the edges of control dishes, the antifungal activities were calculated [26]. The percentage of growth inhibition was calculated using the following formula:

Inhibition (%) = (1 − Da/Db) × 100.

where Da represents the diameter of the growth zone in the experimental dish (mm) and Db represents the diameter of the growth zone in the control dish (mm).

Isolation and characterization of the active component of BYF106

The cultural broth (20 L) was extracted with ethyl acetate (4 × 20 L). Ethyl acetate extracts were combined and concentrated by evaporation of menstruum in vacuo. Then the crude extract (10 g) was chromatographed on a silica gel (200–300 mesh) column eluting with CH2Cl2/MeOH" mixtures with stably growing polarity (100:1—100:16, v/v) affording 16 parts (F1-F16). Further purification of part 2 (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 100:2, v/v)by silica gave pure compound 1 (9.7 mg), and further purification of part 4 (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 100:4, v/v)by silica gave pure compound 2 (5.6 mg).

Structural identification of the compound 1 and compound 2 was made by mass and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopies (Agilent 600 MHz DD2, USA). The electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) of the purified compound was recorded on a Mariner Mass 5304 instrument. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were measured in CDCl3 with a Bruker AVANCE-400 (Burker, Switzerland) spectrometer, and the chemical shifts were obtained in δ (ppm) by referring to the solvent signal and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standards [27].

Antibacterial activities of the metabolite

Purified metabolites were screened for their antimicrobial activity. We used three common pathogenic bacteria (E. coli, S. aureus and M. tetragenus) as the test strains. The disc diffusion method was applied to evaluate the antimicrobial activities of isolated metabolites. Filter paper disks with metabolite dissolved in Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) at a concentration (30 µg/filter paper) were added to the Luria Broth (LB) (Table S1) medium, and the plates were incubated at 37ºC (S. aureus and M. tetragenus) for 24 h. Filter papers with DMSO, gentamycin sulfate was set as positive control. The zone of inhibition (ZOI) was determined by measuring the distance from the center of the disk to the end of the clear zone, and the experimental data were recorded using the “cross method” [28].

Data analyses and statistics

All tests were performed in triplicate. Data are shown as mean values ± standard deviation.

Data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0, and figures were drawn using GraphPad Prism 9.0 and MEGA X.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, MT498694-MT498778.

References

  1. Strobel G, Daisy B, Castillo U, Harper J. Natural products from endophytic microorganisms. J Nat Prod. 2004;67(2):257–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu DB, Ye WW, Han Y, Deng ZX, Hong K. Natural products from mangrove Actinomycetes. Mar Drugs. 2014;12(5):2590–613.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fenical W, Jensen PR. Developing a new resource for drug discovery: marine actinomycete bacteria. Nat Chem Biol. 2006;2(12):666–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kroiss J, Kaltenpoth M, Schneider B, Schwinger MG, Hertweck C, Maddula RK, Strohm E, Svatos A. Symbiotic Streptomycetes provide antibiotic combination prophylaxis for wasp offspring. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6:261–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhary HS, Soni B, Shrivastava AR, Shrivastava S. Diversity and versatility of Actinomycetes and its role in antibiotic production. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2013;3(8): S83–S94.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Forister ML, Novotny V, Panorska AK, Baje L, Basset Y, Butterill PT, Drozd P. The global distribution of diet breadth in insect herbivores. PNAS. 2015;112(2):442–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Engel P, Moran NA. The gut microbiota of insects–diversity in structure and function. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37(5):699–735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crotti E, Balloi A, Hamdi C, Sansonno L, Marzorati M, Gonella E, Daffonchio D. Microbial symbionts: a resource for the management of insect-related problems. Microb Biotechnol. 2012;5(3):307–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dossey AT. Insects and their chemical weaponry: new potential for drug discovery. Nat Prod Rep. 2010;27(12):1737–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yin C, Jin L, Li S, Xu X, Zhang Y. Diversity and antagonistic potential of Actinobacteria from the fungus-growing termite Odontotermes formosanus. 3 Biotech. 2019;9(2):45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang YL, Li S, Jiang DH, Kong LC, Zhang PH, Xu JD. Antifungal activities of metabolites produced by a termite-associated Streptomyces canus BYB02. J Agr Food Chem. 2013;61(7):1521–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang TC, Mo JC, Cheng JA. Purification and some properties of cellulase from Odontotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Termitidae). Insect Sci. 2004;11(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng ML, Mo J, Deng TF, Mao WG, Li D. Biology and ecology of Odontotermes formosanus in China (Isoptera: Termitidae). Sociobiology. 2007;50:45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kroiss J, Kaltenpoth M, Schneider B, Schwinger MG, Hertweck C, Maddula RK. Symbiotic Streptomycetes provide antibiotic combination prophylaxis for wasp offspring. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6(4):261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bao J, He F, Li Y M. Cytotoxic antibiotic angucyclines and actinomycin s from the Streptomyces sp. XZHG99. J Antibiot. 2018;71:1018–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maskey RP, Helmke E, Laatsch H. Himalomycin A and B: Isolation and structure elucidation of new fridamycin type antibiotics from a marine Streptomyces isolate. J Antibiot. 2003;56(11):942–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin SB, Lin YC, Chen HH. Low molecular weight chitosan prepared with the aid of cellulase, lysozyme and chitinase: Characterisation and antibacterial activity. Food Chem. 2009;116(1):47–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mangamuri UK, Muvva V, Poda S, Kamma S. Isolation, identification and molecular characterization of rare Actinomycetes from mangrove ecosystem of Nizampatnam. Malays J Microbiol. 2012;8(2):83–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ormond EL, Thomas APM, Pugh PJA, Pell JK, Roy HE. A fungal pathogen in time and space: the population dynamics of Beauveria bassiana in a conifer forest. Fems Microbiol Ecol. 2010;74(1):146–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fialho VS, Rodrigues VB, Elliot SL. Nesting strategies and disease risk in necrophagous beetles. Ecol Evol. 2018;8(6):3296–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Subramani R, Aalbersberg W. Culturable rare Actinomycetes: diversity, isolation and marin natural product discvery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;21:9291–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Visser AA, Nobre T, Currie CR, Aanen DK, Poulsen M. Exploring the potential for Actinobacteria as defensive symbionts in fungus-growing termites. Microb Ecol. 2012;63:975–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang YL, Li S, Jiang DH, Kong LC, Zhang PH, Xu JD. Antifungal activities of metabolites produced by a termite-associated Streptomyces canus BYB02. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61(7):1521–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bibi F, Yasir M, Song GC, Lee SY, Chung YR. Diversity and characterization of endophytic bacteria associated with tidal flat plants and their antagonistic effects on oomycetous plant pathogens. Plant Pathol J. 2012;28(1):20–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li S, Shao MW, Lu YH, Kong LC, Jiang DH, Zhang YL. Phytotoxic and antibacterial metabolites from Fusarium proliferatum ZS07 isolated from the gut of long-horned grasshoppers. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62(36):8997–9001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu X, Shao MW, Yin CP, Mao ZC, et al. Diversity, bacterial symbionts, and antimicrobial potential of termite-associated fungi. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang S X, Fang H, Yin C, et al. Antimicrobial metabolites produced by Penicillium mallochii CCH01 isolated from the gut of Ectropis oblique, cultivated in the presence of a histone deacetylase Inhibitor. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Terlaky T. A convergent criss-cross method. Optimization. 1985;16(5):683–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Grant 32072421 and 32011540382.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yanhua Long and Yong Zhang contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China

    Yanhua Long, Yong Zhang, Fang Huang & Yinglao Zhang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China

    Song Liu & Tian Gao

Authors
  1. Yanhua Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Song Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tian Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yinglao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LYZ designed the research. YHLsupervised the study. FH, YZ, SL and TG performed the experiments and analyzed the data. YZ wrote the manuscript. All author revised the manuscript and approve the final version for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinglao Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Medium formula used in the experiment.

Additional file 2:

Table S2. List of all actinobacterial strains isolated from Odontotermes formosanus and combs.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Long, Y., Zhang, Y., Huang, F. et al. Diversity and antimicrobial activities of culturable actinomycetes from Odontotermes formosanus (Blattaria: Termitidae). BMC Microbiol 22, 80 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02501-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02501-5

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us