Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

Research article
Open Access

In vivo functional analysis of L-rhamnose metabolic pathway in Aspergillus niger: a tool to identify the potential inducer of RhaR

BMC MicrobiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:214

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-1118-z

©  The Author(s). 2017

Received: 8 June 2017

Accepted: 18 October 2017

Published: 6 November 2017

Abstract

Background

The genes of the non-phosphorylative L-rhamnose catabolic pathway have been identified for several yeast species. In Schefferomyces stipitis, all L-rhamnose pathway genes are organized in a cluster, which is conserved in Aspergillus niger, except for the lra-4 ortholog (lraD). The A. niger cluster also contains the gene encoding the L-rhamnose responsive transcription factor (RhaR) that has been shown to control the expression of genes involved in L-rhamnose release and catabolism.

Result

In this paper, we confirmed the function of the first three putative L-rhamnose utilisation genes from A. niger through gene deletion. We explored the identity of the inducer of the pathway regulator (RhaR) through expression analysis of the deletion mutants grown in transfer experiments to L-rhamnose and L-rhamnonate. Reduced expression of L-rhamnose-induced genes on L-rhamnose in lraA and lraB deletion strains, but not on L-rhamnonate (the product of LraB), demonstrate that the inducer of the pathway is of L-rhamnonate or a compound downstream of it. Reduced expression of these genes in the lraC deletion strain on L-rhamnonate show that it is in fact a downstream product of L-rhamnonate.

Conclusion

This work showed that the inducer of RhaR is beyond L-rhamnonate dehydratase (LraC) and is likely to be the 2-keto-3-L-deoxyrhamnonate.

Keywords

L- rhamnose catabolic pathwayInducerTranscriptomicsPectinaseGene regulation

Background

Plant biomass is mainly composed of polysaccharides. In nature, fungi secrete a broad range of polysaccharide degrading enzymes to release monosaccharides, which are then used as nutrients. Pectin is a complex plant cell wall polysaccharide that can be divided into four sub-structures: homogalacturonan (HGA), xylogalacturonan (XGA) and rhamnogalacturonan I and II (RG-I and RG-II) [1]. The backbone of RG-I is composed of alternating L-rhamnose and D-galacturonic acid residues. Long side chains of L-arabinose (arabinan), D-galactose (galactan), or a mixture of L-arabinose and D-galactose residues (arabinogalactan) can be attached to these L-rhamnose residues [2, 3].

A. niger is able to efficiently degrade pectin and can utilize L-rhamnose also as the sole carbon source. A. niger possesses enzymes that are able to enzymatically release L-rhamnose from RG-I. Endo- and exo-rhamnogalacturonase, α-rhamnosidase, rhamnogalacturonan lyase and rhamnogalacturonan acetyl esterase are all active towards the main chain of RG-I [4, 5].

An L-rhamnose transporter (RhtA) has been characterized recently in A. niger [6]. Interestingly, it has been found that rhtA is co-localized with the α-L-rhamnosidase gene rhaB. The transcriptional profile of rhtA and rhaB genes during a time-course growth experiment of A. niger on L-rhamnose suggests not only that there is a coordinated role in the release and the transport of L-rhamnose during consumption but also that strong activation of these two genes do not require high concentrations of L-rhamnose but only low levels [6].

Two pathways are known for the catabolism of L-rhamnose: a phosphorylative and a non-phosphorylative pathway. The phosphorylative pathway is only found in bacteria such as Escherichia coli [7], while the non-phosphorylative pathway is found in bacteria and yeasts [8–12]. In the non-phosphorylative pathway of Schefferomyces stipitis, L-rhamnose is converted to pyruvate and L-lactaldehyde via four metabolic reactions involving a L-rhamnose-1-dehydrogenase (RHA1) that oxidizes L-rhamnose to L-rhamnono-Y-lactone, a L-rhamnono-γ-lactonase (LRA2) that converts L-rhamnono-γ-lactone to L-rhamnonate, a L-rhamnonate dehydratase (LRA3) that converts L-rhamnonate to 2-keto-3-deoxy-L-rhamnonate (L-KDR) and a 2-keto-3-deoxy-L-rhamnonate (L-KDR) aldolase (LRA4) that converts the 2-keto-3-deoxy intermediate to pyruvate and L-lactaldehyde (Fig. 1a). All the genes (RHA1, LRA2, LRA3 and LRA4) have been identified in S. stipitis and the corresponding enzymes have been biochemically characterized [8, 13, 14]. The RHA1, LRA2, LRA3, LRA4 genes are organized in a cluster in S. stipitis together with a transcription factor with a Zn (II)2Cys6 zinc binuclear cluster domain TRC1 (Fig. 1c). This gene cluster is either fully or partially characterized in other fungal species [13]. In A. niger, the homologous genes of RHA1, LRA2, LRA3 designated as lraA, lraB and lraC, as well as the L-rhamnose regulator RhaR [15] are organized in a cluster (Fig. 1c). However, no LRA4 homolog has been found in the cluster in the A. niger genome (Fig. 1b). Only one of the A. niger L-rhamnose metabolic genes, lraC, has been biochemically characterized to encode a L-rhamnonate dehydratase by expressing it in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [16]. A double deletion of lraC and lraA in A. niger resulted in a strain that exhibited no L-rhamnose dehydrogenase activity and could not consume or grow on L-rhamnose [17]. It remains unknown which gene function, lraA or lraC, is actually the cause of the inability of A. niger to grow on L-rhamnose. As the in vivo function of none of the three individual L-rhamnose pathway genes (lraA, lraB and lraC) has been studied yet in A. niger our first goal was to perform an in vivo analysis of their function by making single gene deletion mutants in A. niger. Secondly, we searched and selected lraD candidate genes in the A. niger genome for making the corresponding gene deletions. And thirdly we made use of the metabolic mutants to identify the inducer of RhaR in A. niger. In A. niger, RhaR has been shown to control expression of genes involved in RG-I degradation, the L-rhamnose transporter gene (rhtA) as well as the L-rhamnose catabolic genes (lraA, lraB and lraC) during growth on L-rhamnose [6, 15, 18]. It has been suggested that L-rhamnose or a conversion product thereof could be the inducer of RhaR [15]. Blocking the individual steps in the L-rhamnose pathway would thus allow the identification of the inducer. Either the sugar itself or a metabolic pathway intermediate has been shown to induce other plant biomass related transcriptional regulators, such as L-arabinose/L-arabitol for AraR [19], D-xylose for XlnR [20] and 2-keto-3-deoxy-L-galactonate for GaaR-GaaX activator-repressor module [21]. Therefore, we did not make the deletion mutant of rhtA or any other putative L-rhamnose transporter in order to allow always L-rhamnose uptake.
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the L-rhamnose metabolic pathway in Schefferomyces Stipitis (a) and in Aspergillus niger (b). Orientation of the genes in the gene cluster in S.stipitis and A. niger (c)

(LraA = L-rhamnose-1-dehydrogenase, LraB = L-rhamnono-γ-lactonase, LraC = L-rhamnonate dehydratase, LraD = L-2-keto-3-deoxyrhamnonate aldolase (L-KDR aldolase).

Gene deletion and transcriptomic analysis performed in this study showed that lraA, lraB and lraC are required for growth on L-rhamnose and confirmed that RhaR plays an important role in the regulation of L-rhamnose catabolism and the degradation of pectin. The results also indicate that L-rhamnose, L-rhamnono-Y-lactone and L-rhamnonate are not the inducers of RhaR, but that this is a compound located further down in the metabolic pathway.

Methods

Strains, media and culture conditions

A. niger strain CBS 141257 (Table S1) was used to create the ΔlraA, ΔlraB and ΔlraC strains. The CBS 141257 strain was obtained by transformation of N593.20 with uridine (pyrG) from Aspergillus oryzae [22]. All A. niger strains were grown at 30 °C using minimal medium (MM, pH 6) or complete medium (CM, pH 6) [23] with 1.5% of agar. Spores plates contained CM with 2% D-glucose. Plates used in the growth profile contained MM + 25 mM monosaccharides, inoculated with 1000 spores.

Liquid cultures of two biological duplicates were inoculated with 106spores/ml and incubated in a rotary shaker at 250 rpm and 30 °C. Pre-cultures for RNA isolation were grown for 16 h in 1 L Erlenmeyer flasks containing 250 ml CM with 2% D-fructose. Mycelium was washed with MM and transferred for 2 h in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 ml MM supplemented with 25 mM L-rhamnose for RNA-seq. For qPCR analysis, mycelium was transferred for 2 h in 50 ml Erlenmeyer flaks containing 10 ml MM supplemented with 25 mM carbon source L-rhamnose (Fluka) or L-rhamnonate (Sigma). Mycelium was harvested by vacuum filtration, dried between tissue paper and frozen in liquid nitrogen. New strains were deposited at the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute with strain numbers indicated in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Molecular biology methods and fungal transformation

To construct the deletion cassettes, the upstream and downstream flanks of the genes (lraA, lraB and lraC) were amplified using PCR with gene specific primers (Additional file 2: Table S2). The upstream flank reverse primer and downstream flank forward primer carried homologous sequences, overlapping the ends of the pyrG selection cassette. The pyrG cassette was amplified from pRV1005 and purified using the Wizard_ SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up Start-Up Kits (Promega). These three fragments were combined in a fusion PCR reaction, to generate the deletion cassette. The fusion PCR mixture contained 1 μl of each PCR product, 12.5 μL GoTaq_ Long PCR Master Mix (Promega), 2 μL of each 10 mM primer in a total volume of 25 μL. The following PCR conditions were used: 2 min at 94 °C, 20 s at 94 °C, 20 s at 58 °C, 5 min at 68 °C for 30 cycles and finally an additional 10 min at 68 °C. The amplified deletion cassettes were purified using the Wizard_ SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up Start-Up Kits (Promega). Purified DNA (5 μg) of the deletion cassette was used to transform A. niger. Protoplast-mediated transformations of A. niger were performed as described [24]. DNA was isolated from frozen mycelium, ground with a Tissue Lyser (QIAGEN) using a standard chloroform/phenol extraction. For screening of the A. niger transformants, a PCR was performed using genomic DNA of the transformants. Gene-specific sets of primers were used to check the absence or presence of the ORF (Additional file 2: Table S2). The resulting strains are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

RNA extraction, cDNA library preparation and RNA-seq

Total RNA was extracted from mycelium ground in a Tissue Lyser (QIAGEN) using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Breda, The Netherlands) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Total RNA samples were purified with the NucleoSpin RNA Clean-up Kit (Macherey-Nagel). Contaminating gDNA was removed by an rDNase solution directly on the silica membrane. RNA integrity and quantity were analyzed on a 1% agarose gel using gel electrophoresis and with the RNA6000 Nano Assay using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). cDNA library preparation and sequencing reactions were conducted at BGI Tech Solutions Co., Ltd. (Hong Kong). Illumina library preparation, clustering, and sequencing reagents were used throughout the process following the manufacturer’s recommendations (http://illumina.com). mRNA was purified using poly-T oligonucleotide-attached magnetic beads and then fragmented. The first and second strands cDNA were synthesized and end repaired. Adaptors were ligated after adenylation at the 3′ end. After gel purification, cDNA templates were enriched by PCR. cDNA libraries were validated using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and quantified by qPCR. Single-read samples were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 platform (http://illumina.com). On average 51 bp sequenced reads were constituted, producing approximately a yield of 360 MB raw sequence for each sample.

RNA-seq data analysis and functional annotation

Raw reads were produced from the original image data by base calling. After data filtering, the adaptor sequences, highly ‘N’ containing reads (> 10% of unknown bases) and low quality reads (more than 50% bases with quality value of < 5%) were removed. After data filtering, on average, ∼ 99% clean reads remained in each sample. Clean reads were then mapped to the genome of A. niger NRRL3 (http://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Aspni_NRRL3_1/Aspni_NRRL3_1.home.html) using BWA [25, 26]. No more than two mismatches were allowed in the alignment. On average, 70% total mapped reads to the gene was achieved. We refer to A. niger gene IDs based on the most up-to-date and accurate annotation of the A. niger NRRL3 genome (http://genome.fungalgenomics.ca/). The gene expression level (FPKM) was calculated by using RSEM tool [27]. Genes with expression value higher than 120 were considered highly expressed (approximately top 5%) and differential expression was identified by Student’s t-test with a P-value cutoff 0.05. The RNA-seq data have been submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) [28] with accession number: GSE99865.

qRT-PCR analysis

cDNA was prepared from total RNA (2.5 μg) using Thermoscript RT (Invitrogen) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The sequences of all primers for qRT-PCR analysis were designed using the Primer Express 3.0 software (Applied Biosystems). The primers were tested to determine the optimal primer concentrations and efficiency. Combinations of the 50 nM, 300 nM and 900 nM (final concentration) per primer pair were checked, and based on the dissociation curve the optimal primer concentration per primer pair was chosen. The primer sequences of the tested genes and the reference gene are listed in Additional file 3: Table S3. qPCR analysis was performed by using the ABI 7500 fast real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The reactions consisted of 2 μl forward and reverse primers at optimal concentration, 20 ng cDNA sample, 10 μl ABI Fast SYBR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), and water to a final volume of 20 μl. The cycling parameters were 95 °C for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 3 s and 60 °C for 30 s. A dissociation curve was generated to verify that a single product was amplified. Transcript levels were normalized against the histone H2B gene expression and quantified according to the formula 2 –(Ct gene X – Ct H2B) [29]. Two biological and three technical replicates were analyzed.

Results

In vivo effects of deleting the L-rhamnose metabolic genes

The candidate genes for the first three enzymatic reactions of the L-rhamnose pathway are homologs of the characterized genes of S. stipitis [15]. The single deletions in NRRL3_08837 (ΔlraA), NRRL3_01493 (ΔlraB) and NRRL3_10522 (ΔlraC) resulted in strains that are unable to grow on L-rhamnose (Fig. 2) compared to the reference strain. A similar growth phenotype was observed on L-rhamnose for the ΔrhaR strain (Fig. 2). The small colonies observed for the metabolic deletion mutants on L-rhamnose is background growth since the plates looked similar to our control agar plates without any carbon source added (Fig. 2). Growth of the metabolic deletion mutants on D-glucose was similar to the reference (Fig. 2). This result indicates that all three genes of the pathway are essential for the conversion of L-rhamnose. Growth of ΔlraA and ΔlraB was reduced on L-rhamnonate, while no growth was observed in the ΔrhaR and ΔlraC on L-rhamnonate (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Growth profile on L-rhamnose, L-rhamnonate and D-glucose of the reference strain and the deletion mutants. The reference, ΔlraA, ΔlraD1, ΔlraD2 and ΔlraD3 were grown on MM with 25 mM L-rhamnose, 25 mM L-rhamnonate and 25 mM D-glucose for 4 days at 30 °C. Spore inoculations were done with 1000 spores

Previously, it was already shown by performing a bidirectional BLAST analysis that the closest homolog of S. stipitis LRA4 is NRRL_08779 [15]. However, this gene is not found in the A. niger L-rhamnose cluster (Fig. 1c), it is not induced on L-rhamnose compared to D-glucose and its expression is not affected in the ΔrhaR mutant on L-rhamnose compared to the reference strain (Additional file 4: Table S4). In addition, it has a very low expression level in all growth conditions tested. In order to search for candidate genes for the L-KDR aldolase (lraD), we analyzed the A. niger genome for genes containing any of the InterPro and PFAM domains (Additional file 4: Table S4), similar domains to those found in S. stipitis LRA4 [13]. The most similar gene to S. stipitis LRA4, NRRL_08779, is not significantly expressed on L-rhamnose in the micro-array data, nor in any other in-house micro-array or RNAseq datasets, and was also not detected by qPCR on either L-rhamnose or L-rhamnonate (data not shown), and was therefore excluded as a candidate for this enzymatic function in A. niger. We therefore compared the expression between L-rhamnose and D-glucose of all candidate genes containing the relevant domains and ranked them by fold-change between L-rhamnose and D-glucose, resulting in the selection of three candidate genes (NRRL3_03899, NRRL3_05649, NRRL3_06731). The first candidate was 39-fold up-regulated, the second one was 24-fold up-regulated and the third one was 3-fold up regulated on L-rhamnose in comparison to D-glucose (Additional file 4: Table S4). The other genes were either not induced on L-rhamnose compared to D-glucose or not expressed at all. These three candidate genes for lraD were deleted in the A. niger CBS 141257. Growth phenotypic analysis of the mutants (ΔlraD1, ΔlraD2, ΔlraD3) was performed and growth on L-rhamnose was compared to the reference strain. Deletion of the genes did not affect growth on L-rhamnose and L-rhamnonate (Fig. 2), suggesting that these genes are not the functional homologs of S. stipitis LRA4.

L-KDR is most likely the inducer of the pathway specific regulator RhaR

RhaR was previously identified as an L-rhamnose-responsive transcription factor gene with a role in induction of genes involved in L-rhamnose transport, catabolism and in RG-I degradation [6, 15]. To test the effect of the three metabolic gene deletions on the induction of L-rhamnose responsive genes, RNA-seq analysis was performed. The reference strain and the KO strains ΔlraA, ΔlraB, ΔlraC and ΔrhaR were pre-grown in liquid cultures containing MM with fructose and then transferred to MM with L-rhamnose. RNA-seq analysis showed that the expression levels of lraA, lraB and lraC were close to 0, in ΔlraA, ΔlraB and ΔlraC, respectively (Fig. 3) confirming the deletion of these genes. When lraA, lraB or lraC are deleted, the expression level of the other genes of the L-rhamnose pathway is reduced (Fig. 3). A high expression level was observed for rhaR in the wild type, which was reduced to almost zero in ΔlraC, but only a small reduction in its expression was visible in ΔlraA and ΔlraB (Fig. 3). In the ΔrhaR mutant, expression of lraA, lraB and lraC is strongly reduced, confirming that these genes are under control of RhaR, as previously reported [15]. In the ΔlraA and ΔlraB mutant, the expression level of the L-rhamnose transporter gene (rhtA) is strongly reduced (Fig. 3; Additional file 5: Table S5). However, rhtA was not expressed in the ΔlraC and ΔrhaR mutants (Fig. 3). Only one of the other candidate L-rhamnose transporter genes described previously [6] showed a similar gene expression profile in the reference strain and the metabolic mutants (NRRL3_02828).
Fig. 3

Schematic representation of the expression of rhtA, lraA, lraB and lraC in the L-rhamnose pathway and rhaR in A. niger ΔlraA, ΔlraB, ΔlraC and ΔrhaR strains after 2 h of transfer from fructose to liquid medium containing 25 mM of L-rhamnose. Gene expression values are presented in FPKM

In summary, these results show that in the ΔlraA, ΔlraB or ΔlraC mutant, the transcript level of the other metabolic pathway genes and the transporter gene is reduced. It is most likely that this reduction in gene expression is due to lack of inducer formation and that accumulation of L-rhamnose, L-rhamnono-y-lactone and L-rhamnonate does not result in hyper-induction of RhaR-regulated genes as was seen previously for the A. niger ΔgaaC mutant during growth on D-galacturonic acid [21]. These results also demonstrate that L-rhamnose, L-rhamnono-γ-lactone and L-rhamnonate are not the inducers of RhaR, and we therefore hypothesized that the inducer is formed further down in the L-rhamnose catabolic pathway and it therefore might be L-KDR. To strengthen this hypothesis, we checked the expression of six rhamnose-induced genes after 2 h of transfer of the metabolic mutants to L-rhamnonate as well. Fructose pre-grown mycelium of the reference, ΔrhaR, ΔlraA, ΔlraB and ΔlraC strains were transferred to MM supplemented with either L-rhamnose or L-rhamnonate. qPCR analysis showed reduced expression levels for lraC, lraB, lraC, rhaR, rhamnogalacturonan lyase (rglB), exo-rhamnogalacturonan hydrolase (rgxA) and rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase (rgaeA) in the lraA and lraC mutants compared to the reference, after 2 h of culture in L-rhamnose, confirming our RNA-seq data results (Fig. 4a-g). Except for rhaR and rgaeA, the expression level of the genes is higher in ΔlraB compared to the reference strain (Fig. 4d and g). Interestingly, all six genes were induced during 2 h of growth of the reference strain on L-rhamnonate (Fig. 4h-n). Transcript levels were similar to those observed for the reference strain on L-rhamnose (Fig. 4a-g). Deletion of either lraA or lraB did not affect the expression of the other metabolic genes, the rhaR gene and the three RG-I specific genes. However, strongly reduced expression levels of lraA, lraB, rhaR, rglB, rgxA and rgaeA were observed in the ΔlraC mutant upon the 2 h transfer to L-rhamnonate compared to the reference strain (Fig. 4h-n).
Fig. 4

Expression levels of lraA (a;h), lraB (b;i), lraC (c;j), rhaR (d;k), rglB (e;l), rgxA (f;m) and rgaeA (g;n) in A. niger ΔlraA, ΔlraB, ΔlraC and ΔrhaR mutants . The expression was measured in the reference and single mutant strains of A. niger after a transfer for 2 h on L-rhamnose (a-g) and L-rhamnonate (h-n). The columns represent the mean and error bars represent standard deviation between biological replicates

CAZy genes involved in degradation of the RG-I were down-regulated in the L-rhamnose pathway mutants

The expression of pectinolytic genes was compared between the L-rhamnose pathway mutants and the reference strain after a transfer for 2 h from fructose to liquid medium containing 25 mM of L-rhamnose to study the transcript profiles of all rhamnose-induced genes in detail. Pectinolytic genes were divided into subclasses, depending on where they act on the pectin backbone: homogalacturonan (HGA), xylogalacturonan (XGA), rhamnogalacturonan-I (RG-I) and side chains (SC) (Additional file 6: Table S6). Most of the genes involved in the degradation of the RG-I backbone were down-regulated in the lraA, lraB, lraC and rhaR deletion mutants compared to the reference strain: two genes encoding GH28 exo-rhamnogalacturonases (rgxA: NRRL3_02832; rgxB: NRRL3_08631), four putative GH78 α-rhamnosidases (NRRL3_02162; NRRL3_06304; NRRL3_03279; NRRL3_07520), one gene encoding a GH105 unsaturated rhamnogalacturonan hydrolase (urhgA; NRRL3_00839), one gene encoding a PL4 rhamnogalacturonan lyase (rglB; NRRL3_10115) and two genes encoding CE12 rhamnogalacturonan acetyl esterases (rgaeA; NRRL3_00169 and rgaeB; NRRL3_07501) (Table 1 and Additional file 6: Table S6). Two pectinolytic genes involved in the degradation of HGA and XGA, one PL1 pectin lyase (pelF; NRRL3_04153) and one CE12 pectin acetyl esterase (paeA; NRRL3_06053), showed a strongly reduced expression level on L-rhamnose in all metabolic deletion strains and in ΔrhaR compared to the reference strain (Additional file 6: Table S6). Two genes involved in the degradation of the pectin side chains, one GH3 β-xylosidase gene (xlnD; NRRL3_02451) and one GH35 β-1, 4-galactosidase gene (lacC; NRRL3_11738) showed a similar transcript profile.
Table 1

Pectinolytic genes that were significantly down-regulated in the A. niger ΔlraA, ΔlraB, ΔlraC and ΔrhaR strains compared to the reference in L-rhamnose

Based on Gruben, B.S., M. Zhou, A. Wiebenga, J. Ballering, K.M. Overkamp, P.J. Punt & R.P. de Vries, (2014) Aspergillus niger RhaR, a regulator involved in L-rhamnose release and catabolism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98: 5531-5540

The expression levels are mean values of duplicate samples. Genes with values higher than 120 are considered highly expressed and marked red.

Genes with values lower than 20 are considered low expressed and marked green.

The fold change is the difference in expression between the reference strain and the deletion mutants.

The cutoff for differential expression is fold change >1.5 (cells marked red if upregulated and green if downregulated) and p-value <0.05 (cells marked yellow).

HGA homogalacturonan, RG-I Rhamnogalacturonan-I, SC side chains, PAE = pectin acetyl esterase, RGX = exorhamnogalacturonase

RHA = endorhamnogalacturonase, URH = unsaturated rhamnogalacturonyl hydrolase, RGL = rhamnogalacturonan lyase

RGAE = rhamnogalacturonan acetyl esterase, LAC = beta-galactosidase, FAE = feruloyl esterase.

Two GH43 endoarabinases showed different expression profiles, abnA (NRRL3_00092) was highly expressed in ΔlraC and abnC (NRRL3_05407) was up-regulated in ΔlraA, ΔlraB and ΔlraC compared to the reference.

Discussion

In this study, we constructed single deletion mutants to confirm in vivo the function of the first three genes of the L-rhamnose catabolic pathway in A. niger (ΔlraA, ΔlraB and ΔlraC). These strains, together with the ΔrhaR mutant, were also used to investigate L-rhamnose-induced transcriptional up-regulation by RhaR in A. niger to elucidate the inducer molecule. Comparative growth analysis of the 3 L-rhamnose catabolic mutants showed that individual deletion of lraA, lraB and lraC results in an inability to use L-rhamnose as a sole carbon source. This indicates that there are no other enzymes capable of replacing the function of LraA, LraB and LraC, at least at a level that can rescue the growth phenotype on L-rhamnose. These results are in line with a previous study in which a double deletion mutant of lraA and lraC in A. niger was unable to grow on L-rhamnose [17, 27].

The second aim of our study was to search for lraD candidate genes in the A. niger genome and identify this function by gene deletion. L-rhamnose catabolism genes (RHA1, LRA2, LRA3 and LRA4) have been previously found in a chromosomal gene cluster in S. stipitis [8, 13]. In A. niger, the orthologs of the S. stipitis RHA1, LRA2 and LRA3 genes, the lraA, lraB and lraC genes, are clustered with rhaR on chromosome II, but the cluster does not contain an LRA4 homolog (lraD) [15]. In this study we selected three candidate genes for lraD that were specifically up-regulated in L-rhamnose and which all have similar PFAM and InterPro domains to those found in LRA4 of S. stipitis. However, deletion of these genes did not reduce growth on L-rhamnose, suggesting that neither of them encodes an L-KDR specific aldolase with a key role in L-rhamnose metabolism. Because the five remaining genes in the A. niger genome with a dihydrodipicolinate synthetase family domain (PF00701) were not induced on L-rhamnose or not expressed in any condition (Additional file 4: Table S4), it is very unlikely that these genes are involved in L-rhamnose metabolism in A. niger. A possibility is that the real lraD gene of A. niger belongs to a different aldolase family than the LRA4 of S. stipitis. Also, we cannot exclude that an alternative enzyme could convert L-KDR in the L-rhamnose pathway of A. niger. In Sphingomonas sp., a gene cluster consisting of LRA1–3, LRA5 and LRA6 has been found. LRA5 and LRA6 were assigned as new enzymes, L-KDR-4-dehydrogenase (KDRDH) and 2, 4-diketo-3-deoxy-L-rhamnonate hydrolase (DDRH), respectively [11]. LRA5 (KDRDH) was identified as an NAD+ specific enzyme belonging to the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) superfamily [11] and has been shown to convert L-KDR to 2, 4-diketo-3-deoxy-L-rhamnonate. Interestingly, another KDRDH belonging to the medium chain dehydrogenase reductase (MDR) superfamily has been biochemically characterized in Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans and was found to catalyze the same metabolic reaction [10]. We analysed and compared the PFAM domains in the protein sequences of LRA5 of both species. The KDRDH from Sphingomonas sp. contains an enoyl-(Acyl carrier protein) reductase domain (PF13561) and the KDRDH from the acidophile S. thermosulfidooxidans contains an alcohol dehydrogenase GroES-like domain (PF08240) and a zinc-binding dehydrogenase domain (PF00107). In A. niger, a putative alcohol dehydrogenase (NRRL3_01492) is present in the lraA-C cluster (Fig. 1c), which is 33-fold up-regulated in the micro-array data of A. niger wild-type in L-rhamnose compared to D-glucose [15]. This putative alcohol dehydrogenase contained the same PFAM domains as KDRDH from S. thermosulfidooxidans. Interestingly, this putative alcohol dehydrogenase is well conserved within the genomes of the other Aspergilli [15]. This putative alcohol dehydrogenase might be a likely candidate in A. niger, to convert L-KDR into 2, 4-diketo-3-deoxy-L-rhamnonate.

The third aim was to study the transcript profiles of the L-rhamnose-induced genes in the metabolic deletion mutants to identify the inducer of RhaR in A. niger. In our RNA-seq analysis, genes involved in the L-rhamnose catabolism and in RG-I degradation were significantly lower expressed in ΔlraA, ΔlraB and ΔlraC mutants compared to the reference strain. Our results revealed that 12 of the 23 RG-I related pectinolytic genes were >1.5 fold down-regulated in all the deletion strains compared to the reference strain on L-rhamnose. In the D-galacturonic acid pathway in A. niger, deletion of gaaA and gaaB resulted in reduced expression profiles of pectinolytic genes on D-galacturonic-acid compared to the reference [21], while deletion of gaaC resulted in up-regulation of these genes whereas no difference was observed for the deletion of gaaD. This study also demonstrated that the inducer of the galacturonic acid degradation route is 2-keto-3-deoxy-L-galactonate, which is the substrate for GaaC, indicating that accumulation of an intermediate due to deletion of a pathway gene allows the identification of the inducer of the pathway. Since the expression of L-rhamnose-responsive genes was reduced in the strains in which lraA, lraB or lraC were deleted, this indicates that none of these deletions results in accumulation of the inducer of the pathway regulator (RhaR). The expression did not reduce to zero for all the known rhamnose catabolic genes in all the strains, suggesting that there is either a basal non-regulated expression of these genes or alternatively that they are also under control of other regulatory systems. Based on an alignment between TRC1 in S. stipitis and RhaR in A. niger, regions of the DNA Binding domain are conserved. This correlates with the phylogenetic analysis performed in Koivistoinen et al.,2012. Therefor RhaR appears to be an orthologue of TRC1. Also, since the transcription factor RhaR is conserved within the genomes of the other Aspergilli, and is also conserved in fungal species, we postulate that the product of the LraC reaction, L-KDR, is the inducer of the system. In S. stipitis another transcription factor than TRC1 has been found in the L-rhamnose cluster, FST14. This transcription factor was more up-regulated than TRC1 on L-rhamnose and it might be co-regulating the pectinolytic genes together with TRC1 [13]. This could also be the case in A. niger as previously suggested [15], even though we could not find an orthologue for this regulator in A. niger.

The L-rhamnose transporter encoding gene and the metabolic genes are L-rhamnose-induced and in the qPCR and RNA-seq analysis they have a similar gene expression profile in the metabolic and rhaR deletion mutants. These results and those of Sloothaak et al., 2016 [6] indicate that L-rhamnose is predominantly transported via the RhtA transporter and then converted through the L-rhamnose metabolic pathway.

Previously it was shown that only a small concentration of L-rhamnose is enough to induce the system [6], as also observed for the D-xylose regulatory system in A. niger [30]. The very low expression levels of lraA, lraB, rhaR, rglB, rgxA, rgaeA obtained in ΔlraC in the presence of L-rhamnonate showed that the third step is indeed necessary to generate the inducer. In the ΔlraA and ΔlraB strains the inability to generate the inducer from L-rhamnose can be overcome by supplying L-rhamnonate instead, which is the product of LraB. This then also explains why ΔlraA and ΔlraB can still grow on L-rhamnonate, while ΔlraC cannot. RNA-seq combined with the qPCR results of the L-rhamnose metabolic mutants demonstrated that L-rhamnose, L-rhamnono-γ-lactone and L-rhamnonate are not the inducers of RhaR. Interestingly and in contrast to transfer to L-rhamnose, upon transfer to L-rhamnonate the reference, ΔlraA and ΔlraB strains showed similar expression levels in all the genes tested. L-rhamnonate is unlikely to use the L-rhamnose transporter RhtA, due to its different chemical nature. The higher levels of expression observed in the reference, ΔlraA and ΔlraB strains suggest that by using L-rhamnonate as carbon source which avoids the first 2 steps in the L-rhamnose metabolic pathway, its metabolism still leads to induction of the L-rhamnose pathway. But induction requires a functional LraC since induction is severely affected in the lraC deletion strain.

Because the gene or genes involved in the conversion of L-KDR remain unknown in A. niger, studying metabolic gene deletion mutants further downstream of the LraC step is required to unambiguously establish the identity of the inducer. At this point in time we do not know whether L-KDR is converted by a yet unknown aldolase into L-lactaldehyde and pyruvate or, alternatively by LRA5 and LRA6 homologs to L-lactate and pyruvate. The putative alcohol dehydrogenase present in the cluster, which on the basis of the PFAM domains found and its rhamnose-responsive expression, makes it more likely that the L-rhamnonate degradation pathway involves formation of 2, 4-diketo-3-deoxy-L-rhamnonate from L-KDR. The final C3 metabolites formed (pyruvate and L-lactaldehyde or L-lactate) via these two non-phoshorylating pathways have to be further metabolized via gluconeogenesis. These metabolites are already part of central metabolism and are not expected to play any role in the induction of the rhamnose pathway itself. Lactaldehyde dehydrogenase is involved in the conversion of L-lactaldehyde to L-lactate. Several putative lactaldehyde dehydrogenases (AldA) based on a characterized AldA in E.coli were found in A. niger [31]. The first putative gene (NRRL3_11302) shares 33.3% identity with AldA from E. coli and it is significantly up-regulated in the reference strain compared to all the deletion mutants. Also, one putative lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; NRRL3_07593) that catalyzes the reaction from lactate to pyruvate, shares 37.4% identity with a characterized LDH from Rhizopus oryzae [32]. RNA-seq results showed that this putative gene is not induced after 2 h of transfer. This potentially leaves us with two options for the identity of the inducer, viz. L-KDR or 2, 4-diketo-3-deoxy-L-rhamnonate, and further work will be required to discriminate between these two options.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study confirmed the function of lraA, lraB and lraC in the A. niger L-rhamnose catabolic pathway in vivo. Our search for candidate genes for the L-KDR aldolase (lraD) resulted in selection and deletion of three genes, but none of them showed to have a role in the L-rhamnose pathway. Based on further conserved domain searches with previously characterized L-rhamnose metabolic genes, we suggest that L-KDR may be converted via an unknown aldolase or via an unknown KDRDH.

Gene expression profiling in the wild-type and the L-rhamnose metabolic mutants demonstrated that L-rhamnose, L-rhamnono-γ-lactone and L-rhamnonate are not the inducers of the RhaR-regulated genes. The very low expression levels of the first two metabolic genes (lraA and lraB), three RGI-specific genes (rglB, rgxA, rgaeA) and rhaR observed in ΔlraC in the presence of L-rhamnonate showed that the third step is necessary to generate an inducer in order to activate these genes. In summary, these results thus strongly suggest that the L-rhamnose pathway intermediate L-KDR is the real inducer of RhaR-regulated genes in A. niger.

Abbreviations

CM: 

complete medium

GEO: 

Gene Expression Omnibus

HGA: 

Homogalacturonan

L-KDR: 

2-keto-3-deoxy-L-rhamnonate

MM: 

Minimal medium

RG-I: 

Rhamnogalacturonan I

RG-II: 

Rhamnogalacturonan II

RhaR: 

L-rhamnose responsive transcription factor

RhtA: 

L-rhamnose transporter

XGA: 

Xylogalacturonan

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Joanna Kowalczyk for providing the A. niger reference strain.

Funding

CK and MVA-P were supported by a grant of the Dutch Technology Foundation STW, Applied Science division of NWO, and the Technology Program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs 016.130.609 to RPdV.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets supporting the results of this article are available in the GEO repository with accession number: GSE99865.

Authors’ contributions

RPdV conceived the study. RPdV and EB designed experiments. CK and RK performed the experiments. MVAP performed the bioinformatics analysis. CK analysed the data. CK, EB, JV and RPdV interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Fungal Physiology, Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute & Fungal Molecular Physiology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

References

  1. Voragen AGJ, Coenen G, Verhoef RP, Schols HA. Pectin, a versatile polysaccharide present in plant cell walls. Struct Chem. 2009;20:263–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ha MA, Vietor RJ, Jardine GD, Apperley DC, Jarvis MC. Conformation and mobility of the arabinan and galactan side-chains of pectin. Phytochemistry. 2005;66:1817–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lau JM, McNeil M, Darvill AG, Albersheim P. Structure of the backbone of rhamnogalacturonan I, a pectic polysaccharide in the primary cell walls of plants. Carbohydr Res. 1985;137:111–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. de Vries RP, Kester HCM, Poulsen CH, Benen JAE, Visser J. Synergy between accessory enzymes from Aspergillus in the degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Carbohydr Res. 2000;327:401–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Vries RP, Visser J: Aspergillus enzymes involved in degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2001, 65:497-522.Google Scholar
  6. Sloothaak J, Odoni DI, dos Santos VAP M, Schaap PJ, Tamayo-Ramos JA. Identification of a novel L-rhamnose uptake transporter in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus niger. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006468.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Takagi Y, Sawada H. The metabolism of L-rhamnose in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) - Specialized Sect Enzymological Sub. 1964;92:10–7.Google Scholar
  8. Watanabe S, Saimura M, Makino K. Eukaryotic and bacterial gene clusters related to an alternative pathway of nonphosphorylated L-rhamnose metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:20372–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Twerdochlib AL, Pedrosa FO, Funayama S, Rigo LU. L-rhamnose metabolism in Pichia stipitis and Debaryomyces polymorpus. Can J Microbiol. 1994;40:896–902.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bae J, Kim SM, Lee SB. Identification and characterization of 2-keto-3-deoxy-L-rhamnonate dehydrogenase belonging to the MDR superfamily from the thermoacidophilic bacterium Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans: implications to L-rhamnose metabolism in archaea. Extremophiles. 2015;19:469–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Watanabe S, Makino K. Novel modified version of nonphosphorylated sugar metabolism-an alternative L-rhamnose pathway of Sphingomonas sp. FEBS J. 2009;276:1554–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. un Rigo L, Nakano M, Veiga LA, Feingold DS. L-rhamnose dehydrogenase of Pullularia pullulans. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) - Enzymol. 1976;445:286–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Koivistoinen OM, Arvas M, Headman JR, Andberg M, Penttilä M, Jeffries TW, Richard P. Characterisation of the gene cluster for L-rhamnose catabolism in the yeast Scheffersomyces (Pichia) stipitis. Gene. 2012;492:177–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Koivistoinen OM, Hilditch S, Voutilainen SP, Boer H, Penttilä M, Richard P. Identification in the yeast Pichia stipitis of the first L-rhamnose-1-dehydrogenase gene. FEBS J. 2008;275:2482–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gruben BS, Zhou M, Wiebenga A, Ballering J, Overkamp KM, Punt PJ, de Vries RP. Aspergillus niger RhaR, a regulator involved in L-rhamnose release and catabolism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:5531–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Motter FA, Kuivanen J, Keränen H, Hilditch S, Penttilä M, Richard P. Categorisation of sugar acid dehydratases in Aspergillus niger. Fungal Genet and Biol. 2014;64:67–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuivanen J, Richard P. Engineering a filamentous fungus for L-rhamnose extraction. AMB Express. 2016;6:27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Pardo E, Orejas M. The Aspergillus nidulans Zn (II)2Cys6 transcription factor AN5673/RhaR mediates L-rhamnose utilization and the production of α-L-rhamnosidases. Microb Cell Factories. 2014;13:161.Google Scholar
  19. Battaglia E, Hansen SF, Leendertse A, Madrid S, Mulder H, Nikolaev I, de Vries RP. Regulation of pentose utilisation by AraR, but not XlnR, differs in Aspergillus nidulans and Aspergillus niger. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;91:387–97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hasper AA, Visser J, de Graaff LH: The Aspergillus niger transcriptional activator XlnR, which is involved in the degradation of the polysaccharides xylan and cellulose, also regulates D-xylose reductase gene expression. Mol Microbiol 2000, 36:193-200.Google Scholar
  21. Alazi E, Khosravi C, Homan TG, du Pré S, Arentshorst M, Di Falco M, Pham TTM, Peng M, Aguilar-Pontes MV, Visser J, et al. 2-Keto-3-deoxy-L-galactonate mediates the induction of genes involved in D-galacturonic acid utilization in Aspergillus niger. FEBS Lett. Google Scholar
  22. Alazi E, Niu J, Kowalczyk JE, Peng M, Aguilar Pontes MV, van Kan JA, Visser J, de Vries RP, Ram AF. The transcriptional activator GaaR of Aspergillus niger is required for release and utilization of D-galacturonic acid from pectin. FEBS Lett. 2016;590:1804–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. de Vries RP, Burgers K, van de Vondervoort PJI, Frisvad JC, Samson RA, Visser J: A new black Aspergillus species, A. vadensis, is a promising host for homologous and heterologous protein production. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004, 70:3954-3959.Google Scholar
  24. Kusters-van Someren M, Flipphi M, de Graaff LH, van den Broeck H, Kester H, Hinnen A, Visser J. Characterisation of the Aspergillus niger pelB gene: structure and regulation of expression. Mol Gen Genet. 1992;234:113–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with burrows–wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:589–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene expression omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:207–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. van der Veen D, Oliveira JM, van den Berg WA, de Graaff LH. Analysis of variance components reveals the contribution of sample processing to transcript variation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:2414–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Di Costanzo L, Gomez GA, Christianson DW: Crystal structure of lactaldehyde dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli and inferences regarding substrate and cofactor specificity. J Mol Biol 2007, 366:481-493.Google Scholar
  32. Skory CD. Isolation and expression of lactate dehydrogenase genes from Rhizopus oryzae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:2343–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us