Open Access

Transcriptome profiling analysis reveals metabolic changes across various growth phases in Bacillus pumilus BA06

Contributed equally
BMC MicrobiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:156

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-1066-7

Received: 1 March 2017

Accepted: 4 July 2017

Published: 11 July 2017

Abstract

Background

Bacillus pumilus can secret abundant extracellular enzymes, and may be used as a potential host for the industrial production of enzymes. It is necessary to understand the metabolic processes during cellular growth. Here, an RNA-seq based transcriptome analysis was applied to examine B. pumilus BA06 across various growth stages to reveal metabolic changes under two conditions.

Results

Based on the gene expression levels, changes to metabolism pathways that were specific to various growth phases were enriched by KEGG analysis. Upon entry into the transition from the exponential growth phase, striking changes were revealed that included down-regulation of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, oxidative phosphorylation, flagellar assembly, and chemotaxis signaling. In contrast, the expression of stress-responding genes was induced when entering the transition phase, suggesting that the cell may suffer from stress during this growth stage. As expected, up-regulation of sporulation-related genes was continuous during the stationary growth phase, which was consistent with the observed sporulation. However, the expression pattern of the various extracellular proteases was different, suggesting that the regulatory mechanism may be distinct for various proteases. In addition, two protein secretion pathways were enriched with genes responsive to the observed protein secretion in B. pumilus. However, the expression of some genes that encode sporulation-related proteins and extracellular proteases was delayed by the addition of gelatin to the minimal medium.

Conclusions

The transcriptome data depict global alterations in the genome-wide transcriptome across the various growth phases, which will enable an understanding of the physiology and phenotype of B. pumilus through gene expression.

Keywords

Bacillus pumilus Bacterial flagella Chemotaxis Gene expression Gene regulation Protease RNA-seq Sporulation Stress response Transcriptome Tricarboxylic acid cycle

Background

Bacillus pumilus is an endospore-forming, gram-positive, rod-shaped bacterium. Due to its metabolic diversity and spore dispersal, B. pumilus is ubiquitous in various environments and commonly resistant to extreme environmental conditions [1, 2]. Similar to other Bacillus species, B. pumilus is able to secrete a large number of industrial enzymes, such as lipases [3], xylanases [4], and proteases [57]. Therefore, B. pumilus has attracted attention in biotechnology and was selected to engineer novel industrial production strain [8, 9]. In addition, some strains of B. pumilus were used to produce valuable small molecules [10, 11] and have served as biocontrol agents to manage plant diseases [12]. However, studies pertaining to the physiological and metabolic processes of B. pumilus are extremely limited in comparison with the other Bacillus species.

Along with the great advances in genomics, many strains of B. pumilus have been selected for genome sequencing. To date, more than 30 genomes of B. pumilus are available at NCBI. Based on genomic alignments, B. pumilus is closer to B. subtilis, B. licheniformis, and B. amyloliquefaciens [13], suggesting that similar metabolic or physiological processes may exist between B. pumilus and the model organism B. subtilis. Although the genome is considered the blueprint of life, much information regarding the physiological or metabolic processes is not directly accessible from the genome [14]. Therefore, various omics technologies such as transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics, have been employed as essential steps toward gaining insights into cell physiology from the genome. For instance, a combined omics-based approach has been applied to B. pumilus to try to understand cell physiology in response to oxidative stress and protein secretion [15, 16]. For this purpose, RNA-seq -based transcriptomics analysis is one of the most powerful tools that not only provides important insights into the functional elements of the genome, gene expression patterns and regulation [17], but also offers a simpler and more cost-effective approach [18]. Therefore, the RNA-seq method has been widely applied to many Bacillus species. For example, B. subtilis [19, 20], B. licheniformis [21], and B. thuringiensis [22] were examined by RNA-seq analysis.

B. pumilus BA06 has been isolated from proteinaceous soil and is demonstrated to be able to secrete extracellular proteases that exhibited great potential in leather processing [5, 23, 24]. However, the production of extracellular proteases is considered to occur at the stationary growth phase and is extensively regulated in many species of Bacillus [25, 26]. For example, nitrogen and carbon sources have great impacts on the production of extracellular proteases [27]. Thus, medium components have usually been optimized for fermentation of proteases [28]. In addition, the other physiological processes of secondary metabolite synthesis, protein secretion, and sporulation occur during the stationary growth phase [2931]. Based on studies in B. subtilis, a transition point occurs between the exponential growth and stationary growth phases [32]. Over the various growth phases, the expression of many genes may be turned off and another set of genes may be turned on. For example, more than 100 genes, whose expression was induced at the onset of the stationary growth phase, have been assigned to the SigB regulon [33, 34].

By taking advantage of the RNA-seq technology, a time-resolved transcriptomic analysis to cover the various growth stages of B. pumilus BA06 was performed. The results clearly indicated that changes in gene expression or metabolic pathways were occurring during the various growth phases; this observation will be helpful for us toward understanding the physiology and phenotype of B. pumilus.

Results

Cell growth, sporulation and extracellular protease activity

To gain insights into the temporal transcriptome changes of Bacillus pumilus BA06, two sets of cultures were established in 50 -ml of MM (minimal medium) and GM (MM plus 2% gelatin) in 250 ml flasks. Initially, the growth curve was monitored by measurement of OD600 at 6-h intervals (data not shown). Unexpectedly, the cell density suddenly declined after 12 h. To reflect the intrinsic cell growth, the numbers of vegetative cells and endospores in the same cultures were further calculated by plate -counting. Fig. 1a shows the growth curves of the total cell and endospore counts at various time points; it is evident that the total cell number arrived at its peak at 12 h and then declined at 24 h. The addition of gelatin to the medium did not change the pattern of cell growth except that the cell number was slightly higher. However, endospore formation started at approximately 24 h, and then increased greatly up to a peak at 60 h and 72 h in MM and GM, respectively. Therefore, the cell growth of B. pumilus BA06 could be obviously divided into two phases: the exponential growth and stationary phases with a transition point at 12 h under this condition [32].
Fig. 1

Growth curve (a) and extracellular proteolytic activity (b) of B. pumilus BA06 in the minimal medium (MM) and MM plus gelatin (GM)

Meanwhile, the extracellular protease activity was also monitored during the growing period. Fig. 1b shows that the extracellular protease activity mainly occurred at the onset of the stationary phase with a peak at 48 h in MM, which was consistent with previous results [25]. Moreover, the addition of gelatin led to a higher peak at the delayed time (72 h) in extracellular protease activity (Fig. 1b), indicating that the nitrogen source (gelatin) affected the production of extracellular proteases.

RNA sequencing and identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

Based on the growth curve, cell samples were collected at 5 time points (4 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h) across the exponential growth phase, transition point, and early and late stationary growth phases from three independent cultures of MM and GM; and total RNAs were subsequently isolated (Additional file 1). Three RNA samples for each time point were mixed equally, and used for Illumina sequencing. Finally, approximately 1.5 G clean data were generated for each time point. The summary of the sequence data is presented in Table 1. It was found that more than 98% of the clean reads from each sample could be mapped to the reference genome, indicating that the transcriptome data were sufficient for further analysis.
Table 1

Summary of RNA-seq and the reads mapped to the genome of B. pumilus BA06

Sample name

Left size (M)

Right size (M)

Number of reads

Mapped reads (%)

Paired reads (%)

GC (%)

MM-04

866.19

875.33

23,415,852

23,010,464 (98.27)

23,005,388 (98.27)

42.37

MM-12

847.89

854.26

24,131,710

24,009,599 (99.49)

24,009,599 (99.49)

42.49

MM-24

729.02

738.72

20,629,536

20,492,441 (99.34)

20,492,441 (99.34)

42.77

MM-48

755.99

761.63

20,882,864

20,732,600 (99.28)

20,732,600 (99.28)

42.27

MM-72

829.13

834.27

23,020,742

22,782,607 (98.97)

22,782,607 (98.97)

42.40

GM-04

770.57

777.42

21,326,144

21,223,188 (99.52)

21,223,188 (99.52)

42.33

GM-12

888.51

898.43

25,386,720

25,258,250 (99.49)

25,258,250 (99.49)

42.67

GM-24

792.57

799.42

9,023,902

8,970,697 (99.41)

8,970,697 (99.41)

43.21

GM-48

796.46

803.54

17,332,139

17,212,840 (99.31)

17,212,840 (99.31)

42.61

GM-72

749.20

753.69

20,854,598

20,625,390 (98.9)

20,625,390 (98.9)

42.22

Based on the number of mapped reads against the genome with the Bowtie software, the expression level of each gene was calculated in terms of the FPKM value (A complete list of annotated genes with the FPKM value is presented in Additional file 2.). The DEGs were extracted using the edgeR software with p value <0.05 and log2(fold-change) > 1. Consequently, 1418 and 1499 DEGs were identified between the two different time points in MM and GM, respectively. The numbers of DEGs between the various time points during the growth course of B. pumilus BA06 were analyzed using a Venn diagram (Fig. 2a). Globally, two striking changes of the DEG numbers between the two time points could be observed in the MM cultures, one for the transition point (12 h) and one for the stationary growth phase (48 h). There were 815 and 868 DEGs identified between 12 h/4 h and 48 h/ 24 h (Fig. 2a), respectively, indicating that the metabolic transition and endospore development were an intrinsic consequence of the gene expression change. However, the addition of gelatin to the MM did not change the gene expression pattern of B. pumilus BA06 significantly, except that more DEGs were also found between 72 h/48 h (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2

Analysis of the differentially expressed genes of B. pumilus BA06 grown in MM and GM over the entire growth curve. a Venn diagram analysis and (b) numbers of DEGs between toe time points

All the DEGs were categorized by the RAST system [35]. Table 2 shows the top 12 subsystems with the numbers of the involved DEGs. The most abundant subsystems of DEGs were related to metabolism of “Carbohydrates”, followed by “Amino Acids and Derivatives”, which suggested that the changes in primary metabolism were great between the various growth phases. In addition, the DEGs involved in “Mobility and Chemotaxis” and “Dormancy and Sporulation” were also great in number (see details in the following sections), indicating that the physiology or phenotype would be changed greatly. It was noticed that the change in “Iron Acquisition and Metabolism” would be great for this bacterium since the expression levels of many genes included in iron metabolism were altered between the different growth phases. For example, several operons responsive to iron compound uptake (peg.2296–2299) and siderophore biosynthesis (peg.34–39) were up-regulated upon entry into the transition point (12 h) (Additional file 2). In fact, the operon encoding siderophore biosynthesis is missing in model organism B. subtilis 168, suggesting that something in the physiological or metabolic processes is different among the various Bacillus species.
Table 2

Top 12 functional classification of the DEGs of B. pumilus BA06 during the entire growth curve by RAST analysis

Subsystems

in MM

in GM

12/04

24/12

48/24

72/48

12/04

24/12

48/24

72/48

Carbohydrates

98

2

45

5

79

1

37

22

Amino Acids and Derivatives

42

2

44

1

45

8

29

12

Motility and Chemotaxis

55

7

55

5

55

10

34

33

Cofactor/Vitamin/Prosthetic Group

28

4

12

0

28

1

15

23

Clustering-based Subsystems

25

0

28

0

27

1

42

17

Dormancy and Sporulation

20

0

59

0

16

0

34

31

Cell Wall and Capsule

16

1

17

2

14

0

10

16

Iron Acquisition and Metabolism

18

2

9

0

22

0

14

14

Stress Response

16

0

13

2

13

0

15

13

Nucleosides and Nucleotides

16

1

4

1

16

0

5

7

Protein Metabolism

11

1

14

1

10

0

17

8

Respiration

12

0

6

0

12

0

4

2

Changes in the metabolic pathways at the transition point of growth

A transition point is recognized as a growth phase where the cells cease exponential growth and enter the stationary growth phase in Bacillus [32]. Previous studies have revealed that the expression levels of many genes involved in various metabolic pathways could change between the various growth phases in B. subtilis [36, 37]. Similarly, a large number DEGs in B. pumilus BA06 were identified at the transition point (12 h) from exponential growth in both cultures of MM and GM (Fig. 2). By KEGG analysis, several metabolic pathways were significantly enriched. First, the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) pathway was down-regulated, since the expression levels of almost all the genes involved in the TCA cycle were decreased significantly (Fig. 3). There was no large difference for the cells cultivated in MM and GM (Additional file 3). However, the metabolic pathway from acetyl-CoA to phosphoenol-pyruvate via oxaloacetate was up-regulated [38], which may provide sufficient substrate for the downstream pathway of glycolysis. It was noticed that the accompanying respiration metabolism was also down-regulated (Additional file 3).
Fig. 3

Down-regulation of the tricarboxylic acid cycle of B. pumilus BA06 grown in MM. The gene expression level of each gene was normalized to 1.00 for the first -time point (4 h)

Second, down-regulation of genes encoding flagellar structural proteins and genes involved in chemotaxis signaling was also observed (Fig. 4), indicating that the swarming mobility of B. pumilus BA06 may decrease when entering the transition point. In B. subtilis, the sigma factor (sigD) and the swrA gene were responsive toward activating the expression of the flagellar operon [39]. Similarly, the homologs encoding sigD (peg.585) and swrC (peg.2650) were identified in B. pumilus BA06, which were demonstrated to be down-regulated at the transition point (Additional file 4). For swarming mobility, biosynthesis of biosurfactin is also necessary [40]. The expression of the srf operon, which encodes genes (peg.2905–2910) for the biosynthesis of biosurfactin in B. pumilus, was also down-regulated (Additional file 4). Altogether, the swarming mobility of BA06 may be seriously attenuated when the cells enter the transition point and thereafter.
Fig. 4

Down-regulation of genes involved in flagellar assembly and the chemotaxis signaling pathway of B. pumilus BA06 grown in MM medium at the transition from the exponential growth phase

Continuous up-regulation of sporulation-related genes

For Bacillus species, a critical characteristic is the formation of the endospore, a kind of dormant cells with high resistance to environmental stress. Endospore development starts at the onset of the stationary growth phase, which is subject to highly hierarchical regulation [41]. By means of RAST annotation and manually searching, 123 genes were categorized into “Dormancy and Sporulation” (Additional file 5). A cluster analysis of all the sporulation-related genes is shown in Fig. 5, which was divided into three groups (G-1, G-2 and G-3). A great number of the genes in group G-1 displayed a sharp surge in expression at 12 h and then at 48 h in MM. However, the addition of gelatin to the MM led to an extra surge in expression at 72 h, which was consistent with the observation that endospore formation was delayed in GM in comparison with MM (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 5

Clustering analysis of the expression changes to genes involved in sporulation of B. pumilus BA06. G-1 represents the sporulation-related genes; G-2 displays the genes encoding the sporulation kinases and sporulation initiation phosphotransferases that are involved in sporulation initiation; G-3 shows five regulatory genes encoding sporulation sigma factors SigE, SigF, SigG, SigK, and SigH

A master regulator protein, Spo0A, governs sporulation initiation through phosphorylation by a series of kinases and phosphotransferase [39]. All of these genes were identified in B. pumilus BA06 (Additional file 5) and were clustered into group G-2 (Fig. 5). The expression profile of these genes was generally different from the G-1 group. Many of these genes (G-2) were repressed at the later growth phases, perhaps indicating their leading role only in sporulation initiation.

During the procedure of endospore formation, four sigma factors (SigE, SigF, SigG, and SigK) play important roles in B. subtilis [41]. Their counterparts in B. pumilus BA06 were identified (group G-3), and all of their expression levels were continuously up-regulated across all growth phases (Fig. 5 and Additional file 5). In contrast, expression of sigH (peg.2382) fluctuated over the growth course.

Extracellular proteases and the protein secretion systems

Since B. pumilus produces large extracellular proteases that are of interest to the field of biotechnology, the expression of several extracellular proteases was examined. Table 3 showed that the genes for aprE, aprX and wprA, which encode extracellular proteases, were more highly expressed in the stationary growth phase, which was consistent with the activity assay (Fig. 1b). It was notable that the addition of gelatin led to higher expression level of aprE at 72 h. However, aprE was the major component in the extracellular proteolytic activity in terms of the transcription level. In contrast, the epr and subE genes were largely expressed at the exponential growth phase (4 h) or the transition phase (12–24 h). However, the expression of vpr fluctuated over the entire growth course.
Table 3

Relative expression level of the extracellular proteases of B. pumilus BA06 during the entirety of each growth phase

Gene ID

Gene

Protein

Medium

Expression level in FPKM value

4 h

12 h

24 h

48 h

72 h

peg.2284

aprE

serine alkaline protease (AprE)

MM

128

782

8665

18,789

22,894

GM

71

575

2578

20,671

35,163

peg.658

aprX

alkaline serine protease (AprX)

MM

14

42

192

862

4011

GM

11

40

62

70

4820

peg.1414

subE

subtilisin Carlsberg (SubE)

MM

528

437

467

66

37

GM

376

688

597

220

38

peg.2809

epr

Alkaline serine proteinase (Epr)

MM

107

96

76

48

37

GM

112

115

97

70

42

peg.3435

vpr

extracellular protease (Vpr)

MM

879

332

1106

344

703

GM

747

561

862

1758

801

peg.2794

wprA

Wall-associated protease (WprA)

MM

52

185

258

217

316

GM

97

203

275

198

221

Protein secretion is generally associated with the Bacillus species, which is a critical consideration for the development of the cell factory [42]. By KEGG analysis, two protein secretion pathways were enriched in B. pumilus BA06: the Sec-dependent pathway and Tat system. The expression pattern for these two pathways was similar in both MM and GM cultures (Fig. 6 and Additional file 6). However, the major components involved in the Sec-dependent pathway were expressed with two peaks at 4 h and 48 h. In contrast, the expression of the Tat system was increased in the transition phase (12–24 h). Furthermore, various signal peptidases displayed different expression patterns (Fig. 6). These results implied that various secretion systems may function at various growth phases.
Fig. 6

Expression changes in genes involved in the protein secretion pathways of B. pumilus BA06 grown in MM and GM during the entire growth curve. The corresponding gene IDs are peg.3162 for SecA; peg.2383 for SecB; peg.1131 for SecG; peg.2418 for SecY; peg.1755 for yajC; peg.1750 for SecD; peg.533 for ftsY; peg.535 for spr54; peg.3727 for yidC; peg.1460 for yidC; peg.2558 for tatA; peg.2557 for tatC; peg.2146 for Spase II; peg.2304, peg.364 and peg.482 for Spase I, and peg.1525 for sipW. The gene expression level (FPKM) of each gene was normalized to 1.00 for the first -time point (4 h)

Sigma factors and regulator proteins

Bacillus species usually employ different sigma factors to regulate various physiological processes. For example, SigB in B. subtilis mediates the stress response by regulating a large group of genes [43]. Therefore, the expression pattern of the sigma factors was also examined in B. pumilus BA06 (Fig. 7a and Additional file 7). The sigB gene (peg.3035) displayed a sharp surge in expression in the transition phase (12 h and 24 h), indicating that a stress response may occur at the transition point, which was similar to an observation in B. subtilis [44]. Although a SigB regulon in B. pumilus was not identified, we expect that a similar regulon may exist in this bacterium.
Fig. 7

Expression changes in genes encoding sigma factors (a) and regulatory proteins (b) in B. pumilus BA06 grown in MM and GM during the entire growth curve. The gene expression level (FPKM) of each gene was normalized to 1.00 for the first -time point (4 h)

The other sigma factors exhibited different patterns of expression (Additional file 7). For example, the expression of sigV (peg.3701), rpoN (peg.1161) and rpoE (peg.399) was up-regulated mainly at the stationary growth phase (48 h). In contrast, the expression of sigV (peg.2600) and sig70 (peg.775) was repressed upon entry into the transition phase and thereafter (Fig. 7a).

In B. subtilis, several regulatory proteins were recognized as transition-state regulators, such as Hpr (ScoC), AbrB, and SinR. All their homologs were encoded by the BA06 genome. Their expression pattern is shown in Fig. 7b (Additional file 7). The gene for hpr was highly expressed at the exponential growth phase (4 h) and then declined. In contrast, expression of SinR and pai2 was increased at 48 h and later, especially in GM. Another transition-state regulator, AbrB, was strongly repressed at 48 h, which is consistent with a similar observation in B. subtilis [36].

Global regulators play important roles in the process of gene transcription by binding to the promoter elements. In Bacillus, CodY and Spo0A have been recognized as global regulators. Cody, a GTP-binding protein, regulates more than one hundred genes that are typically repressed during rapid (exponential) growth and induced when cells experience nutrient deprivation [45]. Our data indicated that expression of codY was higher at the exponential growth phase and then declined. In contrast, the expression of Spo0A, a master regulator of sporulation initiation and secondary metabolism in B. subtilis [46], continuously increased up to 48 h. A similar expression pattern for Spo0A was also observed in B. subtilis [36].

Validation of the selected DEGs by real-time PCR

To confirm the accuracy and reproducibility of the transcriptome data, 8 genes were selected for qPCR validation. RNA samples from the cultures of MM and GM at different growth phases were used as templates. The data are shown in Additional file 8, indicating that the two sets of data between the RNA-seq and RT-PCR analyses were almost consistent.

Discussion

In this study, we determined the transcriptome profiles of B. pumilus across the various growth phases in both MM and GM cultures. Through DEG analysis and KEGG enrichment, transcriptional changes to genes that are specific to certain metabolic pathways were unveiled at the various growth phases.

During the exponential growth phase, cellular growth is most active along with a quick depletion of nutrients. When the culture enters the transition phase, stress may occur at least through nutrient depletion [47]. At this transition point, a critical alteration in TCA metabolism was revealed in B. pumilus BA06. Our results showed that the TCA cycle was most active during the exponential growth phase (Fig. 3). Similarly, TCA -cycle enzymes were frequently identified from the B. pumilus cells during the exponential growth phase in the proteomic analysis [16]. The TCA cycle is a central metabolic pathway that not only unifies the carbohydrate, fat and protein metabolic processes, but also produces energy and reducing power. Therefore, the slowdown in the TCA cycle at the transition point and the later growth stage may be a signature of reduced cell activity. Previous studies showed that the expression levels of some genes involved in the TCA cycle decreased when B. subtilis was grown under anaerobic conditions [48]. In addition, glucose may regulate the TCA cycle by repressing several genes for the TCA [49]. In fact, at the transition phase and stationary growth phase, glucose in the culture is consumed. Therefore, regulation of the TCA cycle may include other factors. However, secondary metabolism and sporulation will be triggered in the stationary growth phase, which requires the TCA metabolism to maintain carbohydrate flux and energy. Based on our transcriptome data, the carbohydrate flux could be recycled via another branch pathway, from acetyl-CoA to phosphoenol-pyruvate via oxaloacetate, since the genes encoding pyruvate carboxyl transferase (peg.413) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (peg.2100) were not repressed but were greatly induced in expression upon entry into the transition phase and later growth phases (Fig. 3).

Another significant change at the transition point is down-regulation of the genes involved in flagellar assembly and the chemotaxis signaling pathway. The flagellum is an organ for mobility, which enables bacterial cells to colonize an ecological niche [50]. Mobility is also regulated by chemotaxis factors [39]. There are several chemoreceptors known as methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) that are encoded by B. pumilus, most of which were revealed as being down-regulated after the exponential growth phase (Additional file 4). However, for other factors, such as surfactin, extracellular proteolytic activity was required to support mobility [51, 52]. The operon srf (peg.2905–2910) for biosurfactin biosynthesis was also down-regulated in B. pumilus BA06 at the same growth phase (Additional file 4). In fact, B. pumilus BA06 could produce surfactant at 24 h of culture, although the yield was lower [53]. Together, these data indicate the attenuation of the swarming mobility of B. pumilus upon entering the transition point and thereafter.

Sporulation is a complex cellular process and can be triggered by nutrient limitations [41]. For B. pumilus BA06, the formation of endospores was quick during the stationary growth phase (Fig. 1). Meanwhile, our transcriptome data indicated that almost all the genes involved in sporulation continued to be up-regulated after exponential growth up to the stationary growth phase (Fig. 5 and Additional file 5). The addition of gelatin to the MM led to a delay in both sporulation and expression of the sporulation-related genes. However, sporulation is subject to highly hierarchical regulation. In general, the transcriptional factor Spo0A governs the decision to initiate sporulation by phosphorylation via a series of kinases and phosphotransferases [54]. The expression level of Spo0A (peg.1484) increased slowly from 4 h to 48 h, which was consistent with a previous study in B. subtilis [36]. Since the phosphorylation state is a key factor for Spo0A to initiate sporulation [36], the transcription level observed here may not be relevant to the explanation of its function in sporulation initiation. Five kinases were identified in B. pumilus, of which the expression of KinA (peg.311, peg.312), KinC (peg.373), KinD (peg.276), and KinE (peg.265) was up-regulated. In contrast, KinB (peg.909) was down-regulated at the transition point (Additional file 5). In addition, the sporulation initiation phosphotransferase (Spo0F, peg.3334) was also down-regulated at 12 h and then up-regulated at 48 h and thereafter. Overall, the expression levels of the conserved sporulation kinases and phosphotransferases and Spo0A displayed a pattern that was different from the other sporulation-related genes, whose expression was continuously up-regulated until the later stationary growth phase (Fig. 5). The interruption may be ascribed to their role as only being responsive toward initiating sporulation. Recently, KinD in B. subtilis was shown to delay the onset of sporulation [55]. However, the expression level of KinD in B. pumilus was highest among the five sporulation kinases, which may directly phosphorylate Spo0A [41]. Therefore, KinD may play a more important role in sporulation initiation in B. pumilus.

During the sporulation process, the roles of several specific sigma factors SigE, SigF, SigG, and SigK were well documented in regulation of sporulation. These four factors were sequentially activated after sporulation initiation: sigF in the forespore, sigE in the mother cell, sigG in the forespore, and sigK in the mother cell [54]. Our transcriptome data indicated that all four sigma factors were expressed in a similar way with a peak at the later stationary growth phase (Fig. 5). However, another sigma factor, SigH (peg.2382), was found to participate in the regulation of sporulation in Clostridium difficile [56]. In B. pumilus, sigH was expressed in a manner that was different from the above four sigma factors. SigH may regulate the other genes involved in mobility and cell division. Therefore, the sigH gene may not be specific to sporulation in B. pumilus.

Extracellular protease production and protein secretion are processes of interest to the field of biotechnology. Previously, AprE, Epr, WprA, and Vpr were identified to be extracellular protease in B. pumilus SCU11 [57]. Our transcriptome data indicated that the expression patterns of various extracellular proteases were different in B. pumilus (Table 3). Three genes (aprE, aprX, and wprA) were expressed more highly during the stationary growth phase. Based on the expression levels, these proteases may contribute to the high extracellular proteolytic activity observed in the culture supernatant. In contrast, epr and subE were highly expressed in the exponential growth phase (Table 3), which could be explained by the fact that the expression of epr was controlled by SigD in B. subtilis [58]. However, these results suggested that different regulatory mechanisms and secretion pathways may be employed for the various proteases. In B. subtilis, the regulatory mechanism of the aprE expression has been extensively studied, indicating that at least two positive regulatory proteins (DegU and Spo0A) are involved in regulation of the aprE expression [59, 60]. The expression of degU and spo0A in B. pumilus was up-regulated at 48 h in GM (Additional file 1 and Fig. 7), which may contribute to the observed increase of aprE expression in the medium supplemented with gelatin.

Two protein secretion pathways were enriched by KEGG analysis in B. pumilus: The Sec-dependent pathway and Tat system, which were also identified by the previous proteomics analysis [16]. The Tat system responds by to secreting twin-arginine (RR/KRP) signal peptides, through which 44 proteins are predicated to be secreted in B. subtilis [61]. WprA has been proposed to be secreted through the Tat system in B. pumilus [62]. Regarding the expression pattern during the growth course, the Tat system (including TatA and TatC) may respond by secreting limited proteins and may play a major role in the transition phase. In contrast, the large number of genes involved in the Sec secretion pathway are down-regulated at the transition point, and then up-regulated at 48 h. In general, many proteins have been observed to be secreted extracellularly during the stationary growth phase in B. subtilis [62]. Therefore, the Sec secretion system may respond by secreting many proteins during the stationary growth phase. For example, AprE, Vpr, and aprX may be secreted via this system [63]. However, 65 proteins were detected from the late exponential growth cultures in B. pumilus; this number is much lower than the predicted protein species (513) [57]. Therefore, the Sec-dependent protein secretion system may be the major pathway, especially during the stationary growth phase in B. pumilus.

In Bacillus, alternative sigma factors are involved in the regulation of certain genes or specific metabolic processes. For example, SigB is generally recognized in response to stress. In B. subtilis, approximately 150 general stress-associated genes have been identified as the SigB regulon [64]. The expression of the sigB gene (peg.3035) is also up-regulated greatly at the transition phase in B. pumilus, which is similar with the observation in B. subtilis [37]. Although the sigB regulon has not been identified for B. pumilus, the rsb operon (peg.3029–3033) is induced upon entry into the transition point (Additional file 9). Other sigma factors such as SigW and SigX have been reported to respond to stress. For example, SigW in B. subtilis responds by regulating detoxification and the production of antimicrobial compounds [65]. However, the genes involved in the osmotic and oxidative responses, such as opuAA (peg. 2747, peg.3708), opuAB (peg.3707), opuCB (peg.1139), opuCA (peg.1140), perR (peg.820), and cat (peg.2205, peg.3703), have been shown to be up-regulated at the transition point in B. pumilus (Additional file 8: Table S8); some of these genes have also been revealed to be involved in the response to oxidative stress in another study using B. pumilus Jo2 and a microarray-based transcriptome analysis [15]. Therefore, B. pumilus may suffer from stress when entering the transition phase and subsequently activates a set of stress-related genes to be expressed in a manner that is similar to B. subtilis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, an RNA-seq-based transcriptome analysis was first applied to B. pumilus BA06 to monitor the transcriptional profile over the entire growth course in a defined MM or GM medium. Changes to the specific metabolic pathways in terms of gene expression were shown to relate to the transition from the exponential growth phase and the onset of the stationary growth phase. Upon entry into the transition point, one of the striking changes was down-regulation of central TCA metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation. Furthermore, the cellular mobility ability was also reduced because of down-regulation of genes involved in flagellar assembly and the chemotaxis signaling pathway. In contrast, many stress-responding genes including the SigB regulon, were induced in expression after entering the transition point, indicating that the cells may suffer from stress. During the stationary growth phase, a significant change occurred in the genes involved in sporulation, and more than 100 sporulation-related genes were induced, which was consistent with the process of sporulation formation. However, the addition of gelatin to the MM medium did not cause a great impact on the transcriptome profile, except for the genes encoding sporulation-related proteins and extracellular proteases with delayed expression.

Methods

Bacterial strain and growth conditions

B. pumilus BA06 was routinely maintained on Luria-Bertani (LB, 10 g/l tryptone, 5 g/l yeast extract, 10 g/l NaCl, pH 7.5) agar plate. A single colony of B. pumilus BA06 was selected for transfer into 10 ml LB broth and incubated at 37 °C overnight with shaking at 140 rpm. Afterward, 500 μl of an overnight culture was transferred into 50 ml of minimal medium [MM, 1.0 g/l sodium citrate, 2.0 g/l (NH4)2SO4, 14.0 g/l K2HPO4, 6.0 g/l KH2PO4, 0.2 g/l MgSO4, 2.5 g/l yeast extract, 5.0 g/l D-glucose] and the gelatin-amended minimal medium (GM) (2.0 g/l gelatin) in 250-ml flasks. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 140 rpm for the indicated time points.

At various time points, the cell density was measured by reading the OD560 on a spectrometer. The total number of cells and endospores was also determined. To account for the total cell number, a 10-fold dilution of the fresh culture was achieved by serial dilution in sterile PBS buffer. Finally, 0.1 ml of the cell suspension was dispensed onto LB agar plates, and the colonies assigned as the total cells were counted after incubation at 37 °C. To count the number of endospores, an aliquot of fresh culture was sampled and incubated at 55 °C for 15 min to kill the vegetative cells; and the samples were diluted as above and dispensed onto LB agarose plates. The colonies formed on these plates were regarded as endospores. Meanwhile, extracellular protease activity was also assayed using casein as the substrate as described previously [24]. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

RNA isolation, library construction and Illumina sequencing

The cell samples were pelleted by centrifugation at 8000 rpm at the indicated time points (4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h) from the B. pumilus BA06 cultures in MM and GM, and the cells were then suspended in TE buffer supplemented with 1.5 mg/ml lysozyme and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min, to which the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was added. The cell suspension was mixed extensively while using the gauge to disrupt the cells completely. Finally, total RNA was isolated following the instructions provided with the TRIzol reagent. The genomic DNA was removed using the Genome DNA Eraser kit (Takara, Dalian, China).

Subsequently, the rRNA was removed using the Ribo-ZeroTM rRNA Removal kit (Epicentre Biotech, Madison, WI). The resulting mRNAs were fragmented and reverse transcribed using random hexamers as the primer. Second strand cDNA synthesis was performed using DNA Polymerase I and RNase H. The cDNA fragments were processed for end repair and ligated to paired end adaptors. Finally, the library was constructed and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeqTM2000 sequencing platform.

Mapping and identification of the differentially expressed genes

Clean data were obtained from the raw data by removing the sequences of the adapters and low-quality reads. The clean reads were aligned to the B. pumilus genome (GenBank accession number: AMDH00000000) [13] using Bowtie2 with default parameters, allowing up to one-base mismatches [66]. The aligned read files were processed by Cufflinks v2.2.1 [67]. The relative abundances of the transcripts were calculated as the fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among the different samples were extracted by using edgeR in the Bioconductor package [68]. The DEGs were defined with an FDR (false discovery rate) ≤ 0.05 and log2fold-change (log2FC) ≥ 1.

Functional classification and KEGG analysis

Functional classification of DEGs was performed online by RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology, http://www.nmpdr.org/FIG/wiki/view.cgi/FIG/ RapidAnnotationServer). RAST is a fully automated service that is especially designed for annotating bacterial and archaeal genomes [35]. Once one gene is annotated, it can be classified into various subsystems.

Meanwhile, the DEGs were further assigned to KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways on the KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (http://www.genome.jp/kegg).

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

The expression levels of the selected eight genes (degS, aprX, glnR, hpr, vpr, sinR, yqkD, and spo0A) of B. pumilus BA06 growing under the same conditions, were validated by real-time RT-PCR analysis. The real-time RT-PCR was performed using an iCyclerMyiQ Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The PCR conditions were set up as 95 °C for 2 mins, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 65 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 20 s. A melting curve analysis of the amplification products was performed at the end of each PCR run to ensure that unique products were amplified. The specific primers used for the selected genes are listed in Additional file 10. The expression level was normalized to the internal control gene 16S rRNA, using the 2−ΔΔCt method [69].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the American Journal Experts (www.aje.com) for language edition for our manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Fund of China (31171204). The funding sponsor had no role in the design of the study, collections, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or decision to publish the results.

Availability of data and materials

The raw Illumina sequencing dataset of the B. pumilus BA06 strain is available on the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (ARS) database under accession SRR5115698-707. The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Authors’ contributions

HF and HYW conceived and designed the experiments; LLH, HHS, GL, CYX and XJC performed the experiments; LLH, HHS, YCL and HF analyzed the data; HF and TXM contributed reagents and materials; HF, LLH and HHS wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment, Ministry of Education, Sichuan Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Sichuan University
(2)
College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University

References

  1. Liu Y, Lai Q, Dong C, Sun F, Wang L, Li G, et al. Phylogenetic diversity of the Bacillus pumilus group and the marine ecotype revealed by multilocus sequence analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80097.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Connor N, Sikorski J, Rooney AP, Kopac S, Koeppel AF, Burger A, et al. Ecology of speciation in the genus Bacillus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:1349–58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Kim HK, Choi HJ, Kim MH, Sohn CB, Oh TK. Expression and characterization of Ca2+-independent lipase from Bacillus pumilus B26. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1583:205–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Battan B, Sharma J, Dhiman SS, Kuhad RC. Enhanced production of cellulase-free thermostable xylanase by Bacillus pumilus ASH and its potential application in paper industry. Enzy Microbial Technol. 2007;41:733–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang Q, Peng Y, Li X, Wang H, Zhang Y. Purification and characterization of an extracellular alkaline serine protease with dehairing function from Bacillus pumilus. Curr Microbiol. 2003;46:169–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kumar AG, Swarnalatha S, Gayathri S, Nagesh N, Sekaran G. Characterization of an alkaline active-thiol forming extracellular serine keratinase by the newly isolated Bacillus pumilus. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;104:411–9.Google Scholar
  7. Jaouadi B, Ellouz-Chaaboum S, Rhimi M, Bejar S. Biochemical and molecular characterization of a detergent-stable serine alkaline protease from Bacillus pumilus CBS with high catalytic efficiency. Biochimie. 2008;90:1291–305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Küppers T, Steffen V, Hellmuth H, O’Connell T, Bongaerts J, Maurer KH, et al. Developing a new production host from a blueprint: Bacillus pumilus as an industrial enzyme producer. Microbial Cell Fact. 2014;13:46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wemhoff S, Meinhardt F. Generation of biologically contained, readily transformable, and genetically manageable mutants of the biotechnologically important Bacillus pumilus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:7805–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hua D, Ma C, Lin S, Song L, Deng Z, Maomy Z, et al. Biotransformation of isoeugenol to vanillin by a newly isolated Bacillus pumilus strain: identification of major metabolites. J Biotechnol. 2007;130:463–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Srivastava RK, Jaiswal R, Panda D, Wangikar PP. Megacell phenotype and its relation to metabolic alterations in transketolase deficient strain of Bacillus pumilus. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;102:1387–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bacillus pumilus strain GB 34 (006493) Fact Sheet. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/registration/fs_PC-006493_13-Mar-03.pdf.
  13. Zhao CW, Wang HY, Zhang YZ, Feng H. Draft genome sequence of Bacillus pumilus BA06, a producer of alkaline serine protease with leather-dehairing function. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:6668–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Wiegand S, Dietrich S, Hertel R, Bongaerts J, Evers S, Volland S, et al. RNA-Seq of Bacillus licheniformis: active regulatory RNA features expressed within a productive fermentation. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Handtke S, Schroeter R, Jürgen B, Methling K, Schlüter R, Albercht D, et al. Bacillus pumilus reveals a remarkably high resistance to hydrogen peroxide provoked oxidative stress. PLoS One. 2014;9:e85625.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Handtke S, Volland S, Methling K, Albrecht D, Becher D, Nehls J, et al. Cell physiology of the biotechnical relevant bacterium Bacillus pumilus—an omics-based approach. J Biotechnol. 2014;192:204–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sorek R, Cossart P. Prokaryotic transcriptomics: a new view on regulation, physiology and pathogenicity. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:9–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nagalakshmi U, Waern K, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a method for comprehensive transcriptome analysis. Curr Protocol Mol Biol. 2010;4:4.11.11–14.11.13.Google Scholar
  19. Nicolas P, Mäder U, Dervyn E, Rochat T, Leduc A, Pigeonneau N, et al. Condition-dependent transcriptome reveals high-level regulatory architecture in Bacillus subtilis. Science. 2012;335:1103–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Brinsmade SR, Alexander EL, Livny J, Stettner AI, Segrè D, Rhee KY, et al. Hierarchical expression of genes controlled by the Bacillus subtilis global regulatory protein CodY. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:8227–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo J, Cheng G, Gou XY, Xing F, Li S, Han YC, et al. Comprehensive transcriptome and improved genome annotation of Bacillus licheniformis WX-02. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:2372–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bassi D, Colla F, Gazzola S, Puglisi E, Delledonne M, Cocconcelli PS. Transcriptome analysis of Bacillus thuringiensis spore life, germination and cell outgrowth in a vegetable-based food model. Food Microbiol. 2016;55:73–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang HY, Liu DM, Liu Y, Cheng CF, Ma QY, Huang Q, et al. Screening and mutagenesis of a novel Bacillus pumilus strain producing alkaline protease for dehairing. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006;44:1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wan MY, Wang HY, Zhang YZ, Feng H. Substrate specificity and thermostability of the dehairing alkaline protease from Bacillus pumilus. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2009;159:394–403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu RF, Huang CL, Feng H. Salt stress represses production of extracellular proteases in Bacillus pumilus. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14:4339–948.Google Scholar
  26. Rao MB, Tanksale AM, Ghatge MS, Deshpande VV. Molecular and biotechnological aspects of microbial proteases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62:597–635.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta R, Beg QK, Lorenz P. Bacterial alkaline proteases: molecular approaches and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;59:15–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fakhfakh-Zouari N, Haddar A, Hmidet N, Frikha F, Nasri M. Application of statistical experimental design for optimization of keratinases production by Bacillus pumilus A1 grown on chicken feather and some biochemical properties. Process Biochem. 2010;45:617–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Schallmey M, Singh A, Ward OP. Developments in the use of Bacillus species for industrial production. Can J Microbiol. 2003;50:1–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Manabe K, Kageyama Y, Morimoto T, Shimizu E, Takahashi H, Kanaya S, et al. Improved production of secreted heterologous enzyme in Bacillus subtilis strain MGB874 via modification of glutamate metabolism and growth conditions. Microbial Cell Fact. 2013;12:18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Setlow P. Spores of Bacillus subtilis: their resistance to and killing by radiation, heat and chemicals. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;101:514–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Strauch MA, Hoch JA. Transition-state regulators: sentinels of Bacillus subtilis post-exponential gene expression. Mol Microbiol. 1993;7:337–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Brigulla M, Hoffmann T, Krisp A, Völker A, Bremer E, Völker U. Chill induction of the SigB-dependent general stress response in Bacillus subtilis and its contribution to low-temperature adaptation. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:4305–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Akbar S, Gaidenko TA, Kang CM, O’Reilly M, Devine KM, Price CW. New family of regulators in the environmental signaling pathway which activates the general stress transcription factor sigma B of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:1329–38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Blom E-J, Ridder AN, Lulko AT, Roerdink JB, Kuipers OP. Time-resolved transcriptomics and bioinformatic analyses reveal intrinsic stress responses during batch culture of Bacillus subtilis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27160.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang CK, Tai PC, Lu CD. Time-related transcriptome analysis of B. subtilis 168 during growth with glucose. Curr Microbiol. 2014;68:12–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zamboni N, Maaheimo H, Szyperski T, Hohmann HP, Sauer U. The phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase also catalyzes C3 carboxylation at the interface of glycolysis and the TCA cycle of Bacillus subtilis. Metabolic Eng. 2004;6:277–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Mukherjee S, Kearns DB. The structure and regulation of flagella in Bacillus subtilis. Ann Rev Genet. 2014;48:319–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Kearns DB, Losick R. Swarming mobility in undomesticated Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49:581–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Higgins D, Dworkin J. Recent progress in Bacillus subtilis sporulation. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;36:131–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu L, Liu Y, Shin H, Chen RR, Wang NS, Li J, et al. Developing Bacillus spp. as a cell factory for production of microbial enzymes and industrially important biochemicals in the context of systems and synthetic biology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:6113–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Voelker U, Voelker A, Maul B, Hecker M, Dufour A, Haldenwang WG. Separate mechanisms activate sigma B of Bacillus subtilis in response to environmental and metabolic stresses. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:3771–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang S, Haldenwang WG. Contributions of ATP, GTP, and redox state to nutritional stress activation of the Bacillus subtilis Sigma B transcription factor. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:7554–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Sonenshein AL. CodY, a global regulator of stationary phase and virulence in gram-positive bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8:203–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Molle V, Fujita M, Jensen ST, Eichenberger P, González-Pastor JE, Liu JS, et al. The Spo0A regulon of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2003;50:1683–701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sung H-M, Yasbin RE. Adaptive, or stationary-phase, mutagenesis, a component of bacterial differentiation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:5641–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Nakano MM, Zuber P, Sonenshein AL. Anaerobic regulation of Bacillus subtilis Krebs cycle genes. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:3304–11.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Sonenshein AL. Control of key metabolic intersections in Bacillus subtilis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:917–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Harshey RM, Matsuyama T. Dimorphic transition in Escherichia coli and Samonella typhimurium: surface-induced differentiation into hyperflagte swarmer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:8631–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Connelly MB, Young GM, Sloma A. Extracellular proteolytic activity plays a central role in swarming mobility in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:4159–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kerrns DB, Losick R. Swarming mobility in undomesticated Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49:581–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Ji Y, Feng H. Optimal of fermentation medium for producing surfactin by Bacillus pumilus BA06. J Sichuan University (Nat Sci ed). 2016;53:925–30.Google Scholar
  54. Fimlaid KA, Shen A. Diverse mechanisms regulate sporulation sigma factor activity in the Firmicutes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;24:88–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Aguilar C, Vlanakis H, Guzman A, Losick R, Kolter R. KinD is a checkpoint protein linking spore formation to extracellular-matrix production in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. mBio. 2010;1:e00035–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Saujet L, Monot M, Dupuy B, Soutourina O, Martin-Verstraete I. The key sigma factor of transition phase, sigH, control sporulation, metab0lism, and virulence factor expression in Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:3186–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang C, Yu S, Song T, He T, Shao H, Wang H. Extracellular proteome profiling of Bacillus pumilus SCU11 producing alkaline protease for dehairing. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;26:1993–2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Dixit M, Murudkar CS, Rao KK. epr is transcribed from σD promoter and is involved in swarming of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:596–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Yasumura A, Abe S, Tanaka T. Involvement of nitrogen regulation in Bacillus subtilis degU expression. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:5162–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Kodama T, Endo K, Ara K, Ozaki K, Kakeshita H, Yamane K, et al. Effect of Bacillus Subtilis spo0A mutation on cell wall lytic enzymes and extracellular proteases, and prevention of cell lysis. J Biosci Bioeng. 2007;103:13–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Jongbloed JDH, Antelmann H, Hecker M, Nijland R, Pries F, Koski P, et al. Selective contribution of the twin-arginine translocation pathway to protein secretion in Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:44068–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Tjalsma H, Antlmann H, Jongbloed JDH, Braun PG, Darmon E, Dorenbos R, et al. Proteomics of protein secretion by Bacillus subtilis: separating the “secrets” of the secrtome. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68:207–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Antelmann H, Tjalsma H, Voigt B, Ohlmeier S, Bron S, van Dijl JM, et al. A proteomic view on genome-based signal peptide predictions. Genome Res. 2001;11:14984–502.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Nannapaneni P, Hertwig F, Depke M, Hecker M, Mäder U, Völker U, et al. Defining the structure of the general stress regulon of Bacillus subtilis using targeted microarray analysis and random forest classification. Microbiol. 2012;158:696–707.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Turner MS, Helmann JD. Mutations in multidrug efflux homologs, sugar isomerases, and antimicrobial biosynthesis genes differentially elevate activity of the sigma X and sigma W factors in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:5202–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Method. 2012;9:357–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and cufflinks. Nat Protocol. 2012;7:562–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Method. 2001;25:402–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017