Open Access

Determining Clostridium difficile intra-taxa diversity by mining multilocus sequence typing databases

  • Marina Muñoz1, 2,
  • Dora Inés Ríos-Chaparro1,
  • Manuel Alfonso Patarroyo3, 4 and
  • Juan David Ramírez1Email author
BMC MicrobiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:62

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-0969-7

Received: 14 October 2016

Accepted: 3 March 2017

Published: 14 March 2017

Abstract

Background

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is a highly discriminatory typing strategy; it is reproducible and scalable. There is a MLST scheme for Clostridium difficile (CD), a gram positive bacillus causing different pathologies of the gastrointestinal tract. This work was aimed at describing the frequency of sequence types (STs) and Clades (C) reported and evalute the intra-taxa diversity in the CD MLST database (CD-MLST-db) using an MLSA approach.

Results

Analysis of 1778 available isolates showed that clade 1 (C1) was the most frequent worldwide (57.7%), followed by C2 (29.1%). Regarding sequence types (STs), it was found that ST-1, belonging to C2, was the most frequent. The isolates analysed came from 17 countries, mostly from the United Kingdom (UK) (1541 STs, 87.0%). The diversity of the seven housekeeping genes in the MLST scheme was evaluated, and alleles from the profiles (STs), for identifying CD population structure. It was found that adk and atpA are conserved genes allowing a limited amount of clusters to be discriminated; however, different genes such as drx, glyA and particularly sodA showed high diversity indexes and grouped CD populations in many clusters, suggesting that these genes’ contribution to CD typing should be revised. It was identified that CD STs reported to date have a mostly clonal population structure with foreseen events of recombination; however, one group of STs was not assigned to a clade being highly different containing at least nine well-supported clusters, suggesting a greater amount of clades for CD.

Conclusions

This study shows the usefulness of CD-MLST-db as a tool for studying CD distribution and population structure, identifying the need for reviewing the usefulness of sodA as housekeeping gene within the MLST scheme and suggesting the existence of a greater amount of CD clades. The study also shows the plausible exchange of genetic material between STs, contributing towards intra-taxa genetic diversity.

Keywords

Clostridium difficile Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) Distribution pattern Population structure

Background

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is a highly discriminatory method for the molecular identification of microorganism genotypes based on the nucleotide sequence of internal fragments of multiple, highly conserved, single copy housekeeping genes [1]. Housekeeping genes’ polymorphisms allow the assignation of alleles which, as a combination of at least seven targets, define the allele profile or sequence type (ST), which represents each genotype [2]. There is a standardised scheme for different bacterial and fungal species whose sequences are deposited in free-access databases, thereby enabling the results obtained from different regions of the world to be compared. These characteristics consolidate the MLST strategy as a reproducible and scalable typing system, contributing uniform nomenclature for intra-taxa classification [2]. In addition to its usefulness as a typing tool, the analysis of data generated from the MLST scheme (‘MLSA’ for multilocus sequence analysis), provides information about evolutionary and population biology, mainly between clonal populations, due to its great power for group discrimination [3]. Regarding bacteria, the MLSA strategy describes genetic relationships between genotypes, geographic and temporal infection patterns for pathogenic genotypes (associated with outbreaks of disease) [4, 5].

There is a MLST scheme for Clostridium difficile (CD), an anaerobic, spore-forming, gram-positive bacillus which colonises the gastrointestinal tract through oral-faecal contact [6, 7]. CD infection is related to a broad range of manifestations, including asymptomatic colonisation, clinical pictures of slight to serious diarrhoea in individuals having disequilibrium in their gastrointestinal microbiota (as happens in populations exposed to antibiotics), to serious diseases such as pseudomembranous colitis, toxic megacolon, perforations of the colon and even a patient’s death [8]. The impact of CD infection has increased during the last 15 years, due mainly to the emergence of hypervirulent strains [8], causing serious outbreaks around the world [9]. These strains are characterised by: leading to clinical pictures having greater severity (due to toxin hyper-production) [10], failure regarding therapeutic management (due to the presence of point mutations or cassettes, associated with resistance to antibiotics) [11] and high rates of recurrence (related to increased sporulation) [12].

The emergence of these hypervirulent strains has been seen to favour the CD genome’s dynamic architecture, having a high percentage of mobile genetic elements (around 11% of the CD-630 reference strain’s genome [13]). The presence of these elements has led to an increase in their genetic diversity and mobilisation of accessory genes (due to horizontal transfer), which could contribute to CD’s success as an opportunistic pathogen [14]. The association between the molecular characteristics and the clinical pictures produced by CD infection has led to different strategies aimed at describing epidemiological profiles, genetic diversity and CD evolution using three approaches. One involves the microanalysis of the genome’s architecture, such as restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE); another involves identifying specific regions in the genome, such as PCR ribotyping, and toxin-typing whilst a third involves sequencing strategies, the MLST scheme being extremely useful. The aforementioned approaches can be combined for taxonomic classification of CD [14], i.e. the hypervirulent strain BI/NAP1/027, for REA and PFGE groups and PCR ribotyping [15].

The consensus MLST scheme for CD was developed by David Griffiths, Kate Dingle (University of Oxford, UK) et al., in 2010 [16]. This scheme is based on the following housekeeping genes: adenylate kinase (adk), ATP synthase subunit alpha (atpA), 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase (dxr), serine hydroxymethyltransferase (glyA), recombinase A (recA), superoxide dismutase (sodA) and triose phosphate isomerase (tpi). The sequences of these seven housekeeping genes from isolates around the world are deposited in the centralised database (http://pubmlst.org/cdifficile/ [17]) and have allowed to identify more than 300 genotypes,

Phylogenetic analysis based on the concatenated sequences of the seven markers for the STs assignment, from the representative set of isolates (50 reference + 102 clinical isolates, from different sources) used for the development of MLST scheme [16], allowed to identify four main phylogenetic lineages, called clades (1 to 4), and one outlier (Conformed exclusively by the ST-11; PCR ribotype 078). In parallel to the advances in the description of intra-taxa diversity, the results of the evolutionary studies have shown the correlation between genome’s dynamic and different outcomes (including toxin-production profiles and clinical impact) [18].

The most representative molecular epidemiology study of CD, developed by Dingle et al., in 2011 [19], included 1,290 isolates from a single geographic location (United Kingdom). This study confirmed the major clonality of CD populations (with occasional deviations possibly due to recombination effects), the existence of five main clades (C1 to C5, the latter consisting exclusively of ST-11) and the association of specific toxigenic variants with clades.

A recent review summarises the diversity and evolutionary features of CD genome [14]. This report describes atypical arrangements between strains belonging to C5 clade and suggests the existence of additional clades such as C-I clade. Each clade has particular features related to ribotyping (RT) profiles and toxin production, finding that C1 represents a highly heterogeneous cluster (including the largest number of isolates, >100 STs), having toxigenic and non-toxigenic members. The STs belonging to this group are the most frequently detected in CD-infected patients, ST2, 14 and 49 (RT014), ST9 (RT002) and ST17 (RT018) having the greatest clinical impact. C1 STs are characterised by being positive for the two main toxins (A and B) (TcdA+/TcdB+) but negative for binary toxin (CDT). C2 includes the hypervirulent ribotype RT027 (ST1 and others related to it, such as ST41 (RT244), positive for the three toxins (TcdA+/TcdB+/CDT+)). C3, even though not having been studied in detail, has STs isolated from humans (mainly in Europe) having positive toxigenic profiles for three toxins (TcdA+/TcdB+/CDT+) (toxigenic strains). C4 includes strains exclusively for TcdB, but having a great impact at clinical level, associated with the appearance of outbreaks in various regions around the world, i.e. ST37 (RT017). C4 strains have shown resistance to clindamycin and fluoroquinolones. C5 is the most heterogeneous, being related to infections in different sources (humans, animals and food) worldwide and displays atypical toxinogenic profiles [20]. Interestingly, the sixth clade “C-I” is highly divergent and apparently non-toxigenic. This report provides clues about the existence of a greater number of genetic groups than the ones described to date.

Taking into account the usefulness of MLST for genotyping, multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) should be carried out as a high resolution tool for evaluating phylogenetic relationships of prokaryotic populations, from the sequences of loci used for MLST [3]. This study was thus aimed at describing the frequency of STs and clades, also to evaluate the intra-taxa diversity of CD using a collection of isolates that represents the total known diversity of CD currently reported in the CD MLST databases (CD-MLST-db).

Methods

Obtaining data

The dataset having information regarding the descriptive variables related to the epidemiological profiles of all CD isolates was exported from the isolate database available in CD-MLST-db (http://pubmlst.org/cgi-bin/bigsdb/bigsdb.pl?db=pubmlst_cdifficile_isolates). The allelic profile sequences were exported from the script available in the allele/sequence definition database which allows downloading in extended multi-FASTA format, compatible with software for phylogenetic and diversity analysis (http://pubmlst.org/cgi-bin/bigsdb/bigsdb.pl?db=pubmlst_cdifficile_seqdef). The databases were compared for verifying descriptive information regarding all STs reported to date for having information representing known CD diversity (main objective of CD-MLST-db). Concerning STs not available in exportable files, an individual search of the profiles was made via the locus/sequence definitions tool, extracting profile information reported by authors.

Isolate distribution patterns

The breakdown fields' section of the isolate database dataset was explored for describing provenance and epidemiological information. Descriptive statistics were used for describing ST and CD clade distribution profiles according to country and year of report in CD-MLST-db (in terms of frequencies and percentages). STATA software package version 11 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX) was used for statistical procedures.

MLST scheme allele polymorphisms

MLST scheme housekeeping gene allele sequences (defined as each sequence/variant) were analysed (that for CD was proposed by Griffiths et al.) [16]; these sequences were downloaded via XMFA (Extended Multi-FASTA)/concatenated FASTA formats option avalaible in CD-MLST-db. An initial comparison was made via multiple sequence comparison by log-expectation (MUSCLE) [21]. Multiple sequence alignments were used for preliminary analysis directed at identifying the amount of polymorphisms in datasets by determining percentage identity (and thus difference) regarding total allele length for each marker.

Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software, version 7 (MEGA7), was used for determining the nucleotide composition of the alleles reported for each marker [22]. Nucleotide composition analysis highlighted variable sites (defined as positions containing at least two types of nucleotides: a site which is not variable is referred to as a constant site) and parsimony-informative sites (variable sites containing at least two types of nucleotides, at least two of them occurring with a minimum frequency of two). Microsoft Excel was used for calculating parsimony-informative sites per amount of variable sites rate to have comparable data between markers.

Sequence diversity analysis

The allele sequences of all STs reported in CD-MLST-db was the starting point for diversity analysis, considered as diferent combinations which might be found for alleles per gene (allele profiles). Sequences were downloaded from CD locus/sequence definition script for this analysis; they were identified by the amount of STs and the clade to which they belonged, labelled by country and year of report.

DnaSP v5 software was used for analysing genetic diversity, evaluated from concatenated sequences related to housekeeping gene, country or clade [23] for identifying genetic polymorphism level and distribution by calculating haplotype (gene) diversity, nucleotide diversity (π) as the average number of nucleotide differences per site between two sequences and θ indexes (per site, as indicator of mutation rate per nucleotide site per generation), calculated from Eta (h) (the total number of mutations and S the number of segregating/polymorphic sites). Each index was reported with corresponding standard deviations. The π indexes for each set of data were compared for identifying the category having the greatest diversity.

Phylogenetic analysis

The concatenated sequences regarding the total amount of STs (n: 380) were initially compared via phylogenetic reconstruction based on Neighbour-Joining (NJ) algorithm. Subsequently, independent housekeeping genes were compared via multiple alignments using the MUSCLE algorithm. MEGA7 software was used for molecular phylogenetic analysis, using the maximum likelihood (ML) method based on the Tamura-Nei model [24]. The robustness of the nodes was evaluated by Bootstrap method using 1,000 replicates. Homologous genes in Clostridium perfringens were used for each housekeeping gene as outgroup sequences.

The number of clusters (bootstrap values equal or over 80.0%) for each housekeeping gene were identified and a colour was assigned. Cluster colours were then used to describe each ST. This analysis was the basis for constructing an allelic plot graphically representing the amount of clusters identified per housekeeping gene and the clusters to which each ST belonged in each of them. The results were contrasted with classification into clades traditionally accepted for CD, based on the seven housekeeping genes’ concatenated sequence discrimination power.

Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA)

Analyses of the population structure of CD were carried out using eBURST algorithm, which allows to identify groups of related isolates (clonal complexes/BURST groups) within MLST data set [24]. This analysis was developed using the plugin adapted for the BIGSdb database software, available in CD-MLST-db with the aim of determining shared alleles within clonal complexes per se. In order to identify rearrangements (loss and duplication events, hybridisation, horizontal gene transfer or recombination) between the sequences, phylogenetic networks were developed using Neighbor-Net method, available on SplitsTree4 (Version 4.14-4) package with bootstrap test of 1000 iterations [25]. Lastly, evidence of recombination events was assessed through Dnasp 4.0 analysis. This software uses the next rapid and statistically efficient tests to measure the following estimators: Sk^2, calculates the variance of the average number of nucleotide differences between pairs of sequences; Φ, product of effective population size and neutral mutation rate per site, C/μ, the ratio between per-site recombination rate and per-site mutation rate; and RM, quantifies the minimum number of recombination events in the history of the sample [26]. Neighbor-Net method and recombination analysis were carried out for both, the concatenated alignment and each housekeeping gene.

Results

General information regarding CD isolates

The information available in the isolate database covers 1597 isolates, representing the total diversity of CD reported globally (updated: 09-12-16). This database’s breakdown section has information about the source where isolates were obtained, most from humans (94.8% - n: 1,514) and (although in lesser numbers) animals, specifically canines and swine (2.9% - n: 47), clinical areas (2.1% - n: 34) and environmental (0.1% - n: 2). No information was found regarding the results of traditional typing strategies such as PFGE or RAE in most of the isolates reported. Concerning a description of genes encoding toxins (toxin typing), only binary toxin information was found regarding 1,432 isolates, from which 39.1% (n: 560) being positive for these genes and 60.9% were negative (n: 872), the remaining 142 isolates with epidemiological information were reported as “unassigned” for this toxin. No information was found regarding the main toxins (tcdA and tcdB).

Revising the profile/sequence definition databases gave 1,371 sequences associated with 380 allelic profiles (updated: 08-12-16). Each allelic profile in the latter database corresponded to at least one isolate deposited in the isolate database. Comparing the STs in both databases led to identifying a set of 181 STs whose sequences had been reported but for which no data was available in the isolate database. A manual search was thus made individually for this group of STs via the “search profiles” option, giving the place and year of report (the only information available). Including this set of 181 STs led to increasing the set of STs to be analysed to 1,778; however, 6 data were excluded as the ST had not been defined (giving 1,772 for descriptive CD geographical and temporal distribution pattern analysis).

CD geographical and temporal distribution patterns

Complete set of isolates available in CD-MLST-db have been reported from 17 countries: Argentina (AR), Australia (AU), Canada (CA), Chile (CL), China (CN), Colombia (CO), Costa Rica (CR), Denmark (DE), France (FR), Germany (GE), Italy (IT), Japan (JA), Netherlands (NE), Slovenia (SL), Spain (SP), United Kingdom (UK) and United States (US). The greatest representation of isolates was from the UK (87.0% - n: 1,541), followed by, in order, the US (4.4% - n: 79), CN (2.4% - n: 42), JA (1.3% - n: 23), SL (1.2% - n: 22), AU (1.0% - n: 17) and IT (0.8% - n: 14); the other countries have reported less than 10 isolates each one. Regarding Latin-America, the database includes reports of isolates from AR (0.2% - n: 3), CL (0.2% - n: 3), CR (0.2% - n: 3) and CO (0.1% - n: 2). Most isolates (97.5% - n: 1,728) have been assigned to one of the five main clades (C1 to C5) used in the framework of the initial MLST scheme [16]; however, a group of 44 (2.2%) isolates was identified having no value assigned for a clade in the database (hereinafter no value: NV). CD clade distribution analysis identified C1 as being the most abundant (57.7% frequency; n: 1,023) in all samples, followed by C2 (29.1% frequency; n: 516). Most STs classified in the NV group came from SL (34.1% - n: 15) and UK (25.0% - n: 11) and to a lesser extent from JA (13.6% - n: 6), CN (11.4% - n: 5), US and NE (2.3% - n: 1, in both cases). Figure 1a describes the frequency of reported Clades in the set of analysed isolates.
Fig. 1

Epidemiological profiles of CD isolates reported in CD-MLST-db. a Frequency of clades to which all the STs reported belonged. b Frequency of main STs reported (only clades having ≥ 1.0% frequency are shown). c Geographical distribution of CD clades by country of origin. d. Temporal distribution (per year) by clade of reported STs. Percentages were calculated regarding all isolates included in the analysis (n: 1,772). The bottom map used was retrieved from https://www.google.com/about/datacenters/inside/locations/index.html

Analyses of the STs reported in CD-MLST-db allowed us to identify that ST1, belonging to C2, was the most frequent (26.1% - n: 462), followed by a group of 16 STs (69.0% - n: 1,223), 13 STs belonging to C1. All the other STs have been reported as having lower than 1.0% frequency (≤1.0% of frequency – n ≤ 17). Figure 1b shows the frequencies for the main STs.

Analyses of distribution patterns of CD clades by country showed that C1 is the most frequent in most countries, except for CL, CO, CR, FR and SP, where this clade has not been reported. In the case of AU and SL others were the most frequent, being C5 and NV the most frequent and for CR where NV was predominant. Figure 1c shows the clade distribution profiles per country.

Clade distribution according to year of report in CD-MLST-db revealed an increase in reports from 2006 onwards (even though STs have been reported since 1980), most being reported from 2006 to 2009. Analysis of temporal variation per clade identified C1 as the most frequent, and had peaks during 2009/2010 and 2014/2015. Furthermore, in 2013 and 2016 an increase in the number of STs defined as NV was observed (Fig. 1d).

MLST scheme allele diversity

An initial descriptive analysis of the sequences reported for each gene allowed to identify that the glyA, tpi and sodA genes showed the highest number of alleles (59, 58 and 54, respectively), compared to the other genes for which the number of alleles reported was below 46 (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). Multiple alignments of sequences for all alleles reported for each MLST scheme marker identified adk (89.8% identity), atpA (89.0%), tpi (86.1%) and recA (86.0%) genes with higher percentage of sequence identity. By contrast, the lower percentages of identity were found for sodA (77.3%), dxr (78.4%) and glyA (78.9%) (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). However, considering that not all the variable sites in the sequences were parsimony-informative sites, an informative index was calculated (according to that described in the methodology), i.e. comparable data amongst housekeeping genes. The results showed that the highest informative indexes were for recA (0.734) and tpi (0.725), compared to adk (0.686) having the lowest informative index (Additional file 1: Figure S1B). This analysis identified polymorphisms per position between the alleles reported for each marker. Additional file 2: Figure S2 shows the distribution of these polymorphisms throughout the length of these sequences, highlighting informative ones.

Sequence diversity analysis

The genetic diversity analysis of the concatenated sequences of the seven housekeeping genes used for the MLST scheme was calculated for each gene and concatenated sequences. ST sequences were included in this analysis (380 reported in CD-MLST-db at the date of consultation). The results indicated that all indexes were greater for sodA, dxr and glyA, thereby agreeing with intra-taxon diversity findings. The results indicated that sodA and dxr were characterised by being the most diverse markers (Fig. 2a; Additional file 3: Table S1).
Fig. 2

Graphic representation of nucleotide diversity (π) by: a housekeeping gene; b country and c clade

Diversity indexes were also calculated per country of provenance (including the total number of sequences reported for each country in each case); it was found that haplotype diversity was 1,000 for all cases, but isolates from SL (0.03805) and JA (0.02249) had considerably higher nucleotide diversity indexes regarding the other countries (0.007 indexes or less) (Fig. 2b; Additional file 4: Table S2).

Diversity indexes calculated per clade showed that clades traditionally reported for CD had <0.003 nucleotide diversity, ranging from 0.00158 (C2) to 0.00281 (C5). However, the STs included in the NV group had a considerably higher index (0.03964), thereby ratifying the greater diversity of STs forming this cluster (Fig. 2c). Additional file 5: Table S3 shows the set of diversity indexes per Clade. Figure 2a, b and c provide a graphical representation of nucleotide diversity indexes (π) regarding the different comparisons.

Phylogenetic analyses and MLSA

Analysis of the population structure of CD (Based on BURST algorithm) allowed to identify a total of 14 BURST groups/Clonal Complexes (BG) and 24 STs singletons. BG 1 includes the highest number of STs and shows a central subgroup with four linked groups. The other groups are minority, with a maximum of two subgroups (BG-3, −5 and - 8) and only linked subgroups in the BG-8 (Additional file 6: Figure S3). The existence of linked subgroups could be a likely evidence of the existence of recombination events.

NJ phylogenetic reconstruction was conducted based on the concatenated sequences, we observed the typical assignment of the six clusters (C1-C5 clades and NV cluster) and foreseen incongruences i.e. where C2, C3 and NV STs are grouped in C1 (Fig. 3) compatible with signals of recombination. Also, we observed some STs that are grouped within any clade/cluster.
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic analysis from concatenated sequences of the total set of STs (n: 380). The final tree was obtained with Neighbour Joining method using MEGA 7. The red arrows denote the STs with incongruence in their clustering. Black bars mark the STs that are not grouped in a single Clade/Cluster

To test the likelihood of recombination, we constructed Neighbour-Net networks, observing a tailored degree of reticulation for the case of C1-C4 and the independent clustering of C5 and NV in the concatenated network (Additional file 7: Figure S4). Furthermore, the independent analyses per each gene fragment was conducted where is observed that sodA and recA are highly divergent (Additional file 8: Figure S5).

Phylogenetic analysis from the sequences of STs for each housekeeping gene was used as the basis for determining taxon discrimination power. The number of clusters (bootstrap ≥80.0%) in each housekeeping gene were identified in the phylogenetic trees obtained and a colour was assigned for each of them. Additional file 9 shows the phylogenetic reconstructions for each gene from concatenated sequences obtained in MEGA 7 using ML. It was found that adk and atpA were housekeeping genes discriminating the least amount of taxa (5 each), contrary to that found for sodA and dxr (9 and 8 taxa, respectively). These findings agreed with diversity index results, confirming that sodA and dxr are highly polymorphic housekeeping genes. Figure 4 gives the classification results for each ST in the seven housekeeping genes, compared by allele plot construction. Three different analyses showed strong signals of recombination (Figs. 3, 4).
Fig. 4

Allelic plot. Graphic representation of phylogenetic inferences where a colour is assigned to each cluster (Bootstrap ≥80.0%) found per gene (row). For each ST (columns) the cluster to which it belongs was analysed. The first row describes traditional classification per clade for CD. The upper section shows the results for all STs (n: 380) and the lower section shows the zoom of the STs defined as NV

Therefore, we quantified these events through analyses by Dnasp 4.0, that showed a minimum of 119 recombination events in the evolutionary history of concatenated sequences. The per-site recombination rate was almost double (1.9147) in comparison to the per-site mutation (C/μ), accompanied by high parameters of both Sk ^ 2 (3781.796) and Φ (44.227), which confirms the high frequency of recombination events between the sequences used for the MLST scheme. When estimating recombination parameters for the independent genes it was found that sodA and glyA are the ones that contribute most to this behaviour (Table 1).
Table 1

Results of tests for the recombination based on Dnasp 4.0

 

Sk^2

Φ

C/μ

RM

Concatenated

3781.796

44.227

1.9147

119

adk

31.714

3.575

2.2387

12

atpA

28.769

4.034

1.5664

12

dxr

126.315

8.011

1.8696

18

glyA

157.289

8.791

1.9388

25

recA

100.98

6.306

2.4035

14

sodA

178.515

8.802

2.2128

25

tpi

25.33

4.709

0.966

9

Sk^2: variance of the average number of nucleotide differences between pairs of sequences

Φ: product of effective population size and neutral mutation rate per site

C/μ: ratio between per-site recombination rate and per-site mutation rate

RM: minimum number of recombination events in the history of the sample

The group of STs having the greatest amount of incongruences regarding topology were those grouped as NV, where well-supported clusters were found for all housekeeping genes. Comparing these findings revealed common grouping patterns for certain groups of STs, possibly indicating new clusters for the members of this group (mainly from SL and JA, such countries having the greatest nucleotide diversity). In order to untangle this hypothesis, we constructed a ML phylogenetic tree with the STs grouped within NV and we found 10 defined clusters and 8 outliers (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Phylogenetic reconstruction from concatenated sequences of STs grouped as NV. Well-supported clusters are highlighted in grey (n: 10 cluster) and black dots represent bootstrap values ≥ 80.0%

Discussion

In spite of the serious problem currently represented by CD infection, few studies are available at epidemiological and population structure level and those available are geographically localised [16, 27], meaning that the available data must be analysed to identify infection patterns which might contribute towards developing prevention and control strategies for the disease. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) is now accepted and widely used as a method for defining prokaryotic taxonomy and has a wide range of intra-taxa applications, i.e. estimating genetic diversity [3]. Regarding such usefulness, this analysis was used as an exploratory approach to CD-MLST-db, contributing towards the description of reported ST distribution profiles and geographical source, including the possibility of new clades emergence.

It should be stated that the information available in CD-MLST-db represents a valuable tool for advancing research into CD. However, it presents some disadvantages such as identifying groups of STs which are not available in the exportable files, possibly leading to underestimating the results when analysing this information. Regarding the dataset analysed, three limitations were found regarding the availability of information. The profile/sequence definition database indicated 380 STs reported; however, epidemiological data for 181 STs was not available when verifying them in the isolate database. There was also variation regarding the total amount of data to be analysed for each variable in the breakdown section of the isolate database. Then, in spite of efforts at on-going improvement (evidenced by the updating dates for the databases at increasingly shorter intervals (~10 days)), there is still needed improvement regarding crossed comparison between databases and the datasets available in the exportable files. A third limitation during analysis concerned the non-availability of data regarding traditional typing strategies (PFGE and RAE) nor was data available for genes encoding the two main toxins (tcdA and tcdB), since such data is fundamental for comparing CD epidemiological profiles [28] and its clinical impact [14], respectively. Data was only found which was related to the presence of genes encoding binary toxin, indicating around 50% of the isolates evaluated being positive for these genes, thereby differing from previously reported data which indicated that only about 23% of CD isolates were positive for this toxin [14].

Most data came from the UK probably due to greater efforts at ascertaining knowledge regarding CD biology and also to rigorous ICD screening strategies [16, 27]. The panorama describing only less than 10% of isolates coming from countries different to the UK (mainly US, CN, JA, SL, AU and IT, together representing 98.1% of isolates) highlights the need for research aimed at describing molecular epidemiology and genetic diversity in other regions. C1 was the most frequent clade, coinciding with that described in the literature reporting relatively high frequency, many STs in this clade being associated with different outbreaks around the world [14]. C1 has been reported in almost all the countries from which the data set herein evaluated have been obtained, except in CR, CL, CO, FR and SP (Fig. 1c). However, these findings could be an indicator of a different population structure in these countries.

Even though most STs analysed were assigned to a clade, the group of 44 isolates which had no clade assigned (NV) came mainly from SL (34.1%) and UK (25.0%), showing the following particularities: they were mostly related to STs which were not in the exportable file, they had the highest diversity indexes (Fig. 2c) and belonged to the group of STs in which most well-supported clusters were found in phylogenetic analysis (Figs. 3, and 5) which might even correspond to additional clades in the traditional CD taxonomy. Additional studies are thus needed for clarifying the existence of such “new clades”, mainly in regions where these STs have been reported grouped as NV, i.e. SL, (Fig. 5); as well as including isolates from other regions around the world, the existence of STs having similar behaviour could also be explored. Incongruences in the classification of some STs (Fig. 3) and clusters within NV group (Fig. 5) confirm the need for genomic epidemiology studies which have been proposed as an alternative for clarifying the phylogenies obtained from different datasets and also the likely emergence of new genetic groups within NV [29].

Analysis of ST distribution revealed the most frequent to be ST1 belonging to the hypervirulent strain (RT027) which belongs to C2; this is interesting as it does not correspond to the most frequently occurring clade. However, C1’s high frequency could be related to a greater amount of STs having been included (Fig. 1b). Temporal distribution analysis showed that whilst most STs have been reported from 2006 to 2009, there has been an exponential increase in the amount of sequences reported for each allele included in the MLST typing scheme for CD during the last few years (Fig. 1d) and that STs having an NV clade report were found to be most different, corresponding to the most recently reported ones, again indicating the need for continuing CD detection and genotyping in different regions around the world. Analysis of diversity by country showed that SL and JA had the most diverse populations, in spite of the amount of isolates reported being low, compared to UK (Fig. 2b). These findings indicated that there could be highly diverse populations; however, the amount of STs analysed must be increased to confirm such hypothesis. Regarding clades traditionally reported for CD, it was found that C2 was the least diverse clade and C5 the most diverse (Fig. 2c). These findings are interesting as C2 includes hypervirulent STs which have been associated with outbreaks of the disease, meaning that study determining the other molecular characteristics of this group of STs must be continued. It was found that the STs called NV for clade classification into CD-MLST-db had considerably higher diversity indexes (Fig. 2c – Additional file 5: Table S3).

Determining intra-taxa diversity identified adk, atpA, recA and tpi as conserved genes, thereby fulfilling the requirements for a housekeeping gene used for a MLST scheme. However, the other three genes included in the MLST scheme for CD (sodA, dxr and glyA) had a high percentage of sequence variations, corresponding to the majority of informative sites (Additional file 2: Figure 2A and B), as well as having relatively high diversity indexes (Fig. 2a; Additional file 3: Table S1) supported by the reticulated phylogenetic networks (Additional file 8: Figure S5), the strong values of recombination tests observed in Table 1 and high amount of taxon discrimination (Fig. 4; Additional file 9: Figure S6). This means that these housekeeping genes’ usefulness for the MLST scheme must be re-evaluated. Considering that the results were much more marked for sodA, excluding this marker from the CD typing scheme should at least be considered.

Allelic plot findings coincided with those reported in the literature where most STs belonging to the 5 clades traditionally accepted for CD belonged to a single cluster for all genes, except C5 in adk and sodA. This classification was also corroborated when we ran an NJ tree of the total of STs (Fig. 3) despite of the incongruences. It has been described that CD is an organism having clonal population structure and mutational evolution [5]. However, several interesting findings are worth mentioning: i) Incongruences in the clustering of STs across the different clades/clusters when running NJ phylogenetic reconstruction (Fig. 3), ii) Incongruences in the classification of certain STs with some housekeeping genes (mainly sodA) indicating the presence of alleles from other clusters in the allelic plot (Fig. 4); iii) The Neighbour-Net phylogenetic networks displayed reticulated topology and foreseen incongruences in the clustering; iv) The quantification of recombination events was positive for the different methods tested by Dnasp 4.0 (Table 1) and v) The further analyses of Clonal Complexes by eBURST showed a tailored sharing of alleles within groups. These strong signals of recombination agreed with previous reports proposing CD as a genetically heterogeneous species [30] which could be associated with genome plasticity (4.1 to 4.3 Mb size and high mobile genetic content elements (11%), mainly conjugative transposons (CTns)) [13]. In addition to these characteristics, homologous recombination events have been identified in CD (acquired intergene spacer mutations and RNA operons used for ribotyping) [31]. The exchange of genetic material could have biological implications since it could be participating in the mobilisation of loci encoding toxins or conferring resistance against antibiotics [14, 32] and also be influencing species diversification which might be the reason for the emergence of hypervirulent strains, associated with the increased impact of CD infection-associated pathologies during the last 15 years [14]. These signals have been already described in other pathogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae [33], but the forthcoming studies of the population genomics of CD are required to fulfil this hypothesis.

Conclusion

This CD-MLST-db mining approach has thus highlighted this database’s great usefulness for describing CD’s STs and clades regarding the diversity of all STs reported to date. The available data, together with an MLSA, has led to advances in describing this pathogen’s population structure from a genetic point of view, confirming that it is mainly a clonal species with stochastic events of recombination, and that groups of different STs could be grouped into additional clades to those which have traditionally been described for CD. Also, it is important to highlight the paradox emergence of new clusters within NV which could represent possible cryptic species and display relevant epidemiological impact in the CD infection.

Abbreviations

Adk

Adenylate kinase

AR: 

Argentina

atpA

ATP synthase subunit alpha

AU: 

Australia

BG: 

BURST groups/Clonal Complexes

C: 

Clade

CA: 

Canada

CD: 

Clostridium difficile

CD-MLST-db: 

CD MLST database

CDT: 

Binary toxin

CL: 

Chile

CN: 

China

CO: 

Colombia

CR: 

Costa Rica

CT: 

Conjugative transposons

DE: 

Denmark

Dxr

1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase

FR: 

France

GE: 

Germany

glyA

Serine hydroxymethyltransferase

IT: 

Italy

JA: 

Japan

ML: 

Maximum likelihood

MLSA: 

Multilocus sequence analysis

MLST: 

Multilocus sequence typing

NE: 

Netherlands

NJ: 

Neighbour-Joining

NV: 

No value

PFGE: 

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

REA: 

Restriction endonuclease analysis

recA

Recombinase A

SL: 

Slovenia

sodA

Superoxide dismutase

SP: 

Spain

ST: 

Sequence type

TcdA: 

Toxin A

TcdB: 

Toxin B

tpi

Triose phosphate isomerase

UK: 

United Kingdom

US: 

United States

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Centro de Tecnología en Salud (CETESA) for the constant support. We would like to express our thanks to Jason Garry for translating this manuscript.

Funding

The authors wish to thank the Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS) for sponsoring PhD training of Marina Muñoz, within the framework of the National Programme for the Promoting Research Training (Convocatoria 617).

Availability of data and materials

This publication made use of the PubMLST website (http://pubmlst.org/) developed by Keith Jolley [17] and sited at the University of Oxford. The development of that website was funded by the Wellcome Trust. Data was retrieved and is available from http://pubmlst.org/cdifficile/

Data supporting the findings are included in the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

MM and JDR conceived the idea, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. DIRC and MAP analysed the data and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No ethics approval was required for this manuscript. The data was retrieved from a public access database not involving humans (Resolution number 2378 of 2008, ministry of social protection).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Grupo de Investigaciones Microbiológicas–UR (GIMUR), Programa de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario
(2)
Posgrado Interfacultades Doctorado en Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia
(3)
Molecular Biology and Immunology Department, Fundación Instituto de Inmunología de Colombia (FIDIC)
(4)
School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario

References

  1. Sullivan CB, Diggle MA, Clarke SC. Multilocus sequence typing: Data analysis in clinical microbiology and public health. Mol Biotechnol. 2005;29(3):245–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Urwin R, Maiden MC. Multi-locus sequence typing: a tool for global epidemiology. Trends Microbiol. 2003;11(10):479–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Glaeser SP, Kampfer P. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) in prokaryotic taxonomy. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2015;38(4):237–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Maiden MC. Multilocus sequence typing of bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:561–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lemee L, Dhalluin A, Pestel-Caron M, Lemeland JF, Pons JL. Multilocus sequence typing analysis of human and animal Clostridium difficile isolates of various toxigenic types. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(6):2609–17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Noren T, Akerlund T, Back E, Sjoberg L, Persson I, Alriksson I, Burman LG. Molecular epidemiology of hospital-associated and community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection in a Swedish county. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(8):3635–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Leffler DA, Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile Infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(3):287–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Depestel DD, Aronoff DM. Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection. J Pharm Pract. 2013;26(5):464–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Clements AC, Magalhaes RJ, Tatem AJ, Paterson DL, Riley TV. Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027: assessing the risks of further worldwide spread. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(6):395–404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Freeman J, Bauer MP, Baines SD, Corver J, Fawley WN, Goorhuis B, Kuijper EJ, Wilcox MH. The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(3):529–49.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Spigaglia P. Recent advances in the understanding of antibiotic resistance in Clostridium difficile infection. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2016;3(1):23–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Merrigan M, Venugopal A, Mallozzi M, Roxas B, Viswanathan VK, Johnson S, Gerding DN, Vedantam G. Human hypervirulent Clostridium difficile strains exhibit increased sporulation as well as robust toxin production. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(19):4904–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. van Eijk E, Anvar SY, Browne HP, Leung WY, Frank J, Schmitz AM, Roberts AP, Smits WK. Complete genome sequence of the Clostridium difficile laboratory strain 630Deltaerm reveals differences from strain 630, including translocation of the mobile element CTn5. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Knight DR, Elliott B, Chang BJ, Perkins TT, Riley TV. Diversity and evolution in the genome of clostridium difficile. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):721–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens Jr RC, Kazakova SV, Sambol SP, Johnson S, Gerding DN. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):2433–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffiths D, Fawley W, Kachrimanidou M, Bowden R, Crook DW, Fung R, Golubchik T, Harding RM, Jeffery KJ, Jolley KA, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(3):770–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jolley KA, Maiden MC. BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC bioinformatics. 2010;11:595.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Stabler RA, Gerding DN, Songer JG, Drudy D, Brazier JS, Trinh HT, Witney AA, Hinds J, Wren BW. Comparative phylogenomics of Clostridium difficile reveals clade specificity and microevolution of hypervirulent strains. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(20):7297–305.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Dingle TC, Mulvey GL, Armstrong GD. Mutagenic analysis of the Clostridium difficile flagellar proteins, FliC and FliD, and their contribution to virulence in hamsters. Infect Immun. 2011;79(10):4061–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott B, Dingle KE, Didelot X, Crook DW, Riley TV. The complexity and diversity of the Pathogenicity Locus in Clostridium difficile clade 5. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6(12):3159–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC bioinformatics. 2004;5:113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(11):1451–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993;10(3):512–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23(2):254–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuhner MK, Yamato J, Felsenstein J. Maximum likelihood estimation of recombination rates from population data. Genetics. 2000;156(3):1393–401.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Dingle KE, Elliott B, Robinson E, Griffiths D, Eyre DW, Stoesser N, Vaughan A, Golubchik T, Fawley WN, Wilcox MH, et al. Evolutionary history of the Clostridium difficile pathogenicity locus. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6(1):36–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lubbert C, John E, von Muller L. Clostridium difficile infection: guideline-based diagnosis and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111(43):723–31.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature. 2003;425(6960):798–804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Awad MM, Johanesen PA, Carter GP, Rose E, Lyras D. Clostridium difficile virulence factors: Insights into an anaerobic spore-forming pathogen. Gut Microbes. 2014;5(5):579–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Rupnik M, Wilcox MH, Gerding DN. Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(7):526–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Spigaglia P, Barbanti F, Mastrantonio P. Detection of a genetic linkage between genes coding for resistance to tetracycline and erythromycin in Clostridium difficile. Microb Drug Resist. 2007;13(2):90–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chaguza C, Andam CP, Harris SR, Cornick JE, Yang M, Bricio-Moreno L, Kamng'ona AW, Parkhill J, French N, Heyderman RS et al. Recombination in Streptococcus pneumoniae Lineages Increase with Carriage Duration and Size of the Polysaccharide Capsule. mBio. 2016; 7(5).Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017