Open Access

Enhancing pili assembly and biofilm formation in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC19606 using non-native acyl-homoserine lactones

  • Li-mei Luo1,
  • Li-juan Wu1,
  • Yu-ling Xiao1,
  • Dan Zhao1,
  • Zhi-xing Chen1,
  • Mei Kang1,
  • Qi Zhang1 and
  • Yi Xie1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Microbiology201515:62

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0397-5

Received: 10 November 2014

Accepted: 20 February 2015

Published: 7 March 2015

Abstract

Background

Quorum Sensing (QS) systems influence biofilm formation, an important virulence factor related to the bacterial survival and antibiotic resistance. In Acinetobacter baumannii, biofilm formation depends on pili biosynthesis, structures assembled via the csuA/BABCDE chaperone-usher secretion system. QS signaling molecules are hypothesized to affect pili formation; however, the mechanism behind this remains unclear. This study aimed to demonstrate the possible role of QS signaling molecules in regulating pili formation and mediating the ability to form biofilms on abiotic surfaces.

Results

Real-time quantitative PCR analysis showed the expression of the csuA/BABCDE genes distinctly increased when co-cultured with C6-HSL (P < 0.05). Under the same experimental conditions, expression of BfmS and BfmR was significantly higher than the control strain (P < 0.05). A subsurface twitching assay showed a switch from a small to a large and structured clone that may result from enhanced twitching motility (P < 0.05). Transmission electron microscopy analysis of cells lifted from a MH broth co-cultured with C6-HSL showed more abundant pili-like structures than the control strain. We then tested the idea that the addition of a QS signal, and therefore induction of chaperone-usher secretion system genes, provides a greater benefit at higher biofilm densities. An assay for the total fluorescence intensity of the biofilm using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy revealed an obvious increase.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that, increased transcription of the BfmS and BfmR genes, QS signaling molecules enhance the expression of the chaperone-usher secretion system, and this expression is required for twitching motility in A. baumannii. The concomitant pili expression and strain twitching allowed A. baumannii to attach easily to abiotic surfaces and form biofilms at an earlier timepoint.

Keywords

A. baumannii Bacteria Quorum sensing Type IV pili Biofilm Bacterial adhesion

Background

Acinetobacter baumannii is an important Gram-negative nosocomial pathogen often associated with severe nosocomial infections, including ventilator-associated pneumonia, urinary tract infections, bacteremia and septicemia, especially in patients hospitalized in intensive care units [1,2]. A. baumannii is highly resistant to several antimicrobial agents, conferred mainly by intrinsic expression of cephalosporinase and efflux pumps, and by formation of biofilms [3]. The biofilms of A. baumannii lead to a reduction in the accumulation of antibiotics in the biofilm polymeric matrix [4]. Biofilms are also associated with survival properties, virulence expression and bacterial communication [5,6]. Recent studies indicate biofilm development is related to quorum sensing. Quorum sensing is an important global regulatory system in bacteria that provides a mechanism to coordinate the behavior of individual bacteria in a population [7]. Biofilms provide a tertiary structure for bacterial communication mediated by quorum sensing pathways. A number of signaling molecules with the ability to modulate quorum sensing-dependen enzymes are known as regulators for biofilm formation [8,9]. In Gram-negative species, acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) are mainly employed as autoinducers used by bacteria to control biofilm formation and maintenance [10,11]. Along with many kinds of AHLs, the production of C6-HSL was previously found in A. baumannii clinical isolates [12], and most Acinetobacter strains showed very weak degradation activity against C6-HSL [13].

Pili of A. baumannii are encoded by the csuA/BABCDE chaperone-usher assembly system, which is controlled by a two-component regulatory system encoded by BfmS and BfmR. It was previously shown that BfmR is essential for stabilization of csu operon expression and the expression of csuC and csuE genes is involved in the initial surface attachment during biofilm formation [5,14]. These data suggest A. baumannii pili are a key factor in biofilm formation. Although quorum sensing and bacterial pili have been implicated in A. baumannii biofilm formation, there is very little known about the mechanism surrounding these signal molecules, csuA/BABCDE-mediated pili and biofilms in A. baumannii. In this study, an analysis of the processes of pili production and surface attachment of A. baumannii ATCC19606 was initiated, including the associated gene expression of csuA/BABCDE chaperone-usher complex and their regulating genes (BfmS/R). In addition, we present evidence for a possible role of quorum sensing signaling molecules in the formation of biofilms on abiotic surfaces.

Results and discussion

Impact of C6-HSL on chaperone-usher complex expression

The capacity of A. baumannii to form biofilms is a decisive advantage for its survival in the hospital environmental. Recent studies have linked biofilm development with quorum-sensing pathways and bacterial factors, such as A. baumannii pili [15,16]. It is known that disruption of the csuC and csuE ORFs, which belong to the csuA/BABCDE bacterial pili structure gene cluster, results in non-piliated cells and abolishes cell attachment [14]. However, the exact mechanism of how QS pathways and csu influence biofilm formation is unclear. To directly examine all the genetic components of the csuA/BABCDE, and their regulators, the BfmS-BfmR regulating system that includes response factor (BfmR) and sensor kinase (BfmS), we provide data on the comprehensive expression of the pili structure gene cluster and the impact of C6-HSL on this chaperone-usher secretion system. Our results showed expression of bacterial pili structure genes, including csuA/B, csuA, csuB, csuC, csuD and csuE, significantly increased after addition of 100 μmol/L C6-HSL, and the transcript levels of the csuA/BABCDE chaperone-usher complex were increased >1.5-fold over the control group (P < 0.05, Figure 1). Furthermore, at the same experimental conditions, expression of chaperone-usher regulators (BfmS and BfmR) were higher than those of the control strain, and the regulators were increased approx 1.33-fold (P < 0.05, Figure 2).
Figure 1

Transcript levels of genes within the csu operon. Quantitative RT-PCR assays of ATCC19606 cells grown in LB broth without AHLs (control) or with the addition of 100 μmol/L AHLs (C6-HSL). Transcription of each gene of the chaperone-usher complex were increased >1.5-fold.

Figure 2

Transcript levels of the csuA/BABCDE chaperone-usher complex regulating genes BfmS/R. Quantitative RT-PCR assays of ATCC19606 cells grown in LB broth without AHLs (control) or with the addition of 100 μmol/L AHLs (C6-HSL). Both genes were increased approx 1.33-fold.

Subsurface twitching motility and transmission electron microscopy

Despite the lack of flagella, A. baumannii can spread rapidly over surfaces, probably due to twitching motility [17]. Twitching is a form of surface motility mediated by type IV pili [18]. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, twitching has been implicated in biofilm development [19] and a correlation has been found between twitching motility activity and biofilm production [20]. To determine whether C6-HSL affects bacterial twitching motility, we performed a subsurface twitching assay at the agar/glass interface comparing the diameter of twitching motility zones between the control group and A. baumannii treated with 100 μmol/L of C6-HSL. The results showed that A. baumannii co-cultured with 100 μmol/L C6-HSL had markedly increased movement from 1.75 to 8.38 mm in 24 hours (P < 0.05, Figure 3), which may result from enhanced twitching motility. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) was used to confirm that pili formation in A. baumannii cells was stimulated by C6-HSL. The TEM showed there were abundant pili-like structures around the bacteria treated with C6-HSL, while structures of pili were not observed on the top of the control bacterial cells (Figure 4).
Figure 3

Impact of C6-HSL on twitching motility. Four individual colonies grown on separate plates incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The twitching zones were stained and their diameters measured at least three times. Results shown represent the means ± standard deviations.

Figure 4

TEM images of an A. baumannii bacterium grown in solution with or without C6-HSL. TEM images were captured at magnification of ×12,000 (left column) and at ×15,000 (right column). (a) 12, 000-power magnification and (b) 15,000-power magnification of bacterial cell grown on glass slips incubated in MH broth without shaking over night at 37°C. (c) 12,000-power magnification and (d) 15,000-power magnification of bacteria cell growth in MH with 100 μmol/L C6-HSL forms obvious pili-like structures.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

If the increase in expression of bacterial pili seen in A. baumannii in response to C6-HSL is responsible for enhanced twitching motility, maintaining this quorum sensing stimulation in pili expression should obviously increase the capacity of the bacteria to form biofilms. With 100 μmol/L C6-HSL conditions, A. baumannii ATCC19606 was shown to form mature biofilms faster than the control group grown in MH medium, which yielded undeveloped biofilms. The results of the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) show the total fluorescence intensity of biofilms significantly increased in the C6-HSL group and the pili assembling from the surface of the cell was more abundant after C6-HSL stimulation (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Impact of C6-HSL on A. baumannii ATCC19606 biofilm formation. The three-dimensional reconstruction of biofilms (a) in MH medium and (b) with 100 μmol/L C6-HSL added into MH medium were reconstructed after 4 days cultured without shaking at 37°C. The total fluorescence intensity, including (c) fluorescence volume and (d) fluorescence area was analyzed, and the results were averaged from three randomly selected positions of each sample.

A recent study [21] reported that a strain of A. baumannii with a BfmS knockout displayed a reduction in biofilm formation, loss of adherence to eukaryotic cells and greater sensitivity to serum killing. Our results demonstrated the expression of BfmS and BfmR regulated their target genes, the family of csuA/BABCDE chaperone-usher secretion system genes, to produce and assemble bacterial pili. Taken together, the result that the csuA/BABCDE chaperone-usher secretion system was essential to bacterial loci encoding secretion and surface motility (required in the early steps of biofilm formation) combined with our twitching assay results led us to conclude C6-HSL may promote A. baumannii pilus biosynthesis and assembly, as well as strain twitching ability, thereby ensuing formation of biofilms. However, QS signaling molecules are chemically diverse and many bacteria possess more than one AHL synthase [22]. In A. baumannii, many other QS signaling molecules have been verified, such as 3-oxo-C12-HSL, 3-hydroxy-C12-HSL and C8-HSL [12,23]. It is important to keep in mind that we focused only on the impact of C6-HSL on A. baumannii, which limited our study. In the future, it would be important to test other AHLs commonly produced by A. baumannii and other bacteria.

Conclusion

In summary, we provided data demonstrating how, increased expression of BfmS and BfmR, the QS signaling molecule C6-HSL enhanced expression of the chaperone-usher secretion system, and that bacterial pili are required for twitching motility in A. baumannii. Furthermore, the concomitant pili expression and strain twitching allowed A. baumannii to easily attach to abiotic surfaces and form biofilms at an earlier timepoint. QS signaling molecules are required for cell attachment to solid surfaces and the development of biofilms. Our study describes the biofilm formation of A. baumannii in response to a QS signaling molecule, a finding that provides a comprehensive insight into the role of bacterial pili, which play a key role in bacterial biofilm development.

Methods

Strains and culture conditions

A. baumannii ATCC19606 was routinely growth in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth. Strains were grown at 37°C with shaking (220 rpm). N-Hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C6-HSL, C10H17NO3, 100 μmol/L), purchased from Cayman (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), was added to LB broth for co-culture with A. baumannii. Cells were harvested 12 h after inoculation, resuspended in Trizol reagent (TaKaRa, Japan) and stored at −80°C until use.

RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR

Following the manufacturer’s recommendations, RNA was extracted using the MiniBEST Universal RNA Extraction Kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) and then the RNA concentration was adjusted before reverse transcription to avoid differences in gene expression due to different initial amounts of template. After RNA reverse transcription using One Step PrimeScript™ RT-PCR Kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan), Quantitive Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed by LightCycler®480 System ((Roche Diagnostic Systems, Mannheim, Germany). The primers used in this study are listed in Table 1. All qRT-PCR assays were repeated at least three times.
Table 1

Oligonucleotides used for qRT-PCR in this study

Locus tag

Forward primer (5′-3′)

Reverse primer (5′-3′)

16s DNA*

GTAATACAGAGGGTGCGAGCGTT

TCTAGCTGACCAGTATCGAATGCA

csuA/B

CAGCAGCAACAGGTGGCAATA

AAGGTTTGTACGTGCAGCATCA

csuA

TATTGCCTTCTTGTTCTG

CAGTTGAAATACCAGCAC

csuB

TATGCAGCAGATCCTCAG

TAAACTTTCCGTACAACG

csuC

TGGTCAGAAGTTTGCGCGTC

ACCAGAACTGTCCACACCATAAATT

csuD

CCGGTTCCCTAATTTATATGGCA

TAAGGCGTCACCGATGGCA

csuE

GCTTGGCTTTAGCAAACATGACC

ATTGCCATCAGGCCCGCTA

BfmS

ACCGCCCGTAATCCGAAC

TGAACTTATTCCACCGCCTTTA

BfmR

GTTTAACCGTTTGTCGTG

GTGGTTGAACTGGTTTCG

*Oligonucluotides used as references.

Subsurface twitching assay

Surface-associated twitching motility was measured by a method described previously [24]. Briefly, 100 μmol/L C6-HSL was added to Mueller-Hinton (MH) medium solidified with 1% agar. The A. baumannii colony was stab-inoculated through the agar to the underlying Petri dish and covered by a glass cover slip on the inoculation site. After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, the cover slips were carefully lifted up, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (wt/vol) for 1 minute. To remove excess crystal violet, each cover slip was gently washed with PBS and allowed to dry. The visualized diameter of twitching motility zones in C6-HSL concentration and untreated MH were measured at least three times.

Transmission electron microscopy analysis

For TEM analysis, glass cover slips, lifted from MH culture medium, were immediately flooded with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and incubated at 4°C at least 2 h. Then, slips were rinsed with distilled water and dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol ranging from 25 to 100% before being CO2 critical point dried. Samples were negative-stained with 1% phosphotungstic acid and visualized with HC-1 Hitachi TEM SYSTEM (Hitachi, Japan).

Biofilm formation and CLSM assay

A static biofilm formation assay was performed as described previously [25]. Briefly, an overnight culture of A. baumannii ATCC19606 was subsequently diluted 100-fold in fresh MH broth in polystyrene microtiter plates (Corning, New York, NY, USA) with a sterilized glass cover slip in each well. C6-HSL (final concentration 100 μmol/L) was added, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 days. After biofilms occupied the surface of slips, planktonic cells of A. baumannii were washed by PBS three times. SYTO® 9 Nucleic Acid Stain Acce (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to label the biofilms developed by bacterial cells. After 15-min incubation with SYTO® 9, the cover slips were sealed for CLSM (DM IRE 2, Leica Microsystems, Germany). Under the particular wavelengths of 488 nm (absorption maxima) and 498 nm (emission maxima), each sample was scanned in at least three randomly selected positions, and the three-dimensional reconstruction of the biofilms was performed.

Data analysis

T-test of independent sampler was performed to compare two groups by software SPSS 16.0 for Windows, and the p < 0 .05 was considered statistically significant.

Notes

Abbreviations

QS: 

Quroum sensing

A.baumannii

Acinetobacter baumannii

CLSM: 

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

TEM: 

Transmission electron microscopy

C6-HSL: 

N-Hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone

3-oxo-C12-HSL: 

N-(3-oxo-dodecanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone

3-hydroxy-C12-HSL: 

N-(3-hydroxydodecanoyl)homoserine lactone

C8-HSL: 

N-octanoyl-L-homoserine lactone

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Lei Song and Zhang Chao-yang for his technical assistance in TEM. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81000712).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University

References

  1. Dijkshoorn L, Nemec A, Seifert H. An increasing threat in hospitals: multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:939–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Joly-Guillou ML. Clinical impact and pathogenicity of Acinetobacter. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:868–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:538–82.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Espinal P, Marti S, Vila J. Effect of biofilm formation on the survival of Acinetobacter baumannii on dry surfaces. J Hosp Infect. 2012;80:56–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gaddy JA, Actis LA. Regulation of Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm formation. Future Microbiol. 2009;4:273–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Longo F, Vuotto C, Donelli G. Biofilm formation in Acinetobacter baumannii. New Microbiol. 2014;37:119–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Camilli A, Bassler BL. Bacterial small-molecule signaling pathways. Science. 2006;311:1113–6.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Worthington RJ, Richards JJ, Melander C. Small molecule control of bacterial biofilms. Org Biomol Chem. 2012;10:7457–74.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Stacy DM, Welsh MA, Rather PN, Blackwell HE. Attenuation of quorum sensing in the pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii using non-native N-Acyl homoserine lactones. ACS Chem Biol. 2012;7:1719–28.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Garg N, Manchanda G, Kumar A. Bacterial quorum sensing: circuits and applications. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2014;105:289–305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuqua C, Parsek MR, Greenberg EP. Regulation of gene expression by cell-to-cell communication: acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing. Annu Rev Genet. 2001;35:439–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan KG, Cheng HJ, Chen JW, Yin WF, Ngeow YF. Tandem mass spectrometry detection of quorum sensing activity in multidrug resistant clinical isolate Acinetobacter baumannii. Sci World J. 2014;2014:891041.Google Scholar
  13. Ochiai S, Morohoshi T, Kurabeishi A, Shinozaki M, Fujita H, Sawada I, et al. Production and degradation of N-acylhomoserine lactone quorum sensing signal molecules in bacteria isolated from activated sludge. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2013;77:2436–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tomaras AP, Dorsey CW, Edelmann RE, Actis LA. Attachment to and biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces by Acinetobacter baumannii: involvement of a novel chaperone-usher pili assembly system. Microbiology. 2003;149:3473–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Solano C, Echeverz M, Lasa I. Biofilm dispersion and quorum sensing. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2014;18C:96–104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Chow JY, Yang Y, Tay SB, Chua KL, Yew WS. Disruption of biofilm formation by the human pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii using engineered quorum-quenching lactonases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:1802–5.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilharm G, Piesker J, Laue M, Skiebe E. DNA uptake by the nosocomial pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii occurs during movement along wet surfaces. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:4146–53.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Burrows LL. Pseudomonas aeruginosa twitching motility: type IV pili in action. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:493–520.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Klausen M, Heydorn A, Ragas P, Lambertsen L, Aaes-Jorgensen A, Molin S, et al. Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa wild type, flagella and type IV pili mutants. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48:1511–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wolska K, Kot B. Twitching motility activity, biofilm formation, and genetic typing for clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by random amplified DNA PCR. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2013;60:313–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Liou ML, Soo PC, Ling SR, Kuo HY, Tang CY, Chang KC. The sensor kinase BfmS mediates virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2013;47(4):275–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2012.12.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams P. Quorum sensing, communication and cross-kingdom signalling in the bacterial world. Microbiology. 2007;153:3923–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chan KG, Atkinson S, Mathee K, Sam CK, Chhabra SR, Camara M, et al. Characterization of N-acylhomoserine lactone-degrading bacteria associated with the Zingiber officinale (ginger) rhizosphere: co-existence of quorum quenching and quorum sensing in Acinetobacter and Burkholderia. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:51.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Semmler AB, Whitchurch CB, Mattick JS. A re-examination of twitching motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology. 1999;145(Pt 10):2863–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Li M, Huang R, Zhou X, Zhang K, Zheng X, Gregory RL. Effect of nicotine on dual-species biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;350:125–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Luo et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement