Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Detection of natural infection with Mycobacterium intracellulare in healthy wild-caught Chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) by ESAT-6 and CFP-10 IFN-γ ELISPOT tests following a tuberculosis outbreak

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 3, 4, 5,
  • 4, 6 and
  • 1, 4, 7
BMC Microbiology20088:27

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-27

©  Chege et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

  • Received: 20 July 2007
  • Accepted: 07 February 2008
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Both tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria can cause infection in nonhuman primates (NHP), indicating the existence of potential zoonotic transmission between these animals and visitors to zoos or animal handlers in primate facilities. Screening of mycobacterial infections in NHP is traditionally done by tuberculin skin test (TST), which is unable to distinguish between pathogenic and non-pathogenic mycobacterial infections. In this study, we investigated the use of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 for detection of mycobacterial infections in a wild-caught baboon colony after one baboon died of tuberculosis (TB).

Methods

Peripheral blood lymphocytes for interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assay (IFN-γ ELISPOT) assay were obtained from TST positive baboons and those in contact with tuberculous baboons before being euthanased, autopsied and lung tissues taken for histology and mycobacterial culture.

Results

Both ESAT-6 and CFP-10 IFN-γ ELISPOT assays were able to detect early M. tuberculosis but also M. intracellulare infection. Although this indicates potential cross-reactivity with M. intracellulare antigens, the method was able to distinguish M. bovis BCG vaccination from M. tuberculosis infection. This assay performed better than the TST, which failed to detect one M. tuberculosis and two early M. intracellulare infections.

Conclusion

These results suggest that the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay could improve the detection of M tuberculosis infections when screening NHP. There is some doubt, however, concerning specificity, as the assay scored positive three animals infected with M. intracellulare.

Keywords

  • Tuberculosis
  • Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell
  • Tuberculin Skin Test
  • Mycobacterial Infection
  • ELISPOT Assay

Background

The majority of the disease-causing species of the genus Mycobacterium belong to two groups, the M. tuberculosis complex (MTC) and the M. avium-intracellulare complex (MAC). MTC comprises of M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M africanum and the attenuated M. bovis bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG). With the exception of BCG, these species are pathogenic and can cause tuberculosis (TB) in humans and animals [1–3]. Disease caused by MTC pathogens is characterised by tubercle formation in the infected tissues. These bacteria are considered obligate intracellular pathogens and the most efficient mode of transmission is via respiratory route [4]. In contrast, environmental mycobacteria have the capacity to survive and multiply under a wide range of environmental conditions [5] and to interact with a variety of environmental reservoirs, including protozoa and insects [6]. The majority of environmental mycobacteria are considered non-pathogenic. However, members of MAC are capable of causing nontuberculous infections and disease in a wide range of animal species [5, 6]. MAC comprises of two species, M. avium and M. intracellulare, and although these species are considered opportunistic pathogens, their role in human and animal diseases and their pathogenic potential have become increasingly recognised, especially in immunocompromised persons with HIV-1 infection [7, 8].

Non-human primates (NHP) are susceptible to infections caused by members of MTC [9–13] and MAC [14, 15], including M. intracellulare [16, 17], indicating the existence of potential zoonotic transmission between NHP and visitors to zoos and game parks as well as animal handlers and laboratory workers using biological products from NHP. The tuberculin skin test (TST) is the traditional in vivo screening test for detecting TB in NHP [18]. This test utilizes PPDs, which are crude antigen preparations, usually made from M. tuberculosis, M. bovis or M. avium. As PPD contains cross-reactive antigens [19], a positive TST could indicate tuberculous and non-tuberculous disease, prior vaccination with BCG, or immune sensitisation with non-pathogenic environmental mycobacteria. In addition, BCG vaccine vectors are increasingly being used in NHP studies [20–23], making it important to distinguish such vaccinations from natural pathogenic mycobacterial infections.

The 6-kDa early secretory antigenic target (ESAT-6) and culture filtrate protein 10 (CFP-10) are well defined mycobacterial proteins [24–26]. Both are low molecular-weight proteins which are secreted in the culture filtrate by M. tuberculosis and other pathogenic mycobacteria, including M. bovis [27], following short-term axenic culture. These proteins are absent from the genomes of all BCG substrains and those of several non-pathogenic environmental mycobacteria including M. avium avium and M. avium paratuberculosis [24, 28]. Both ESAT-6 and CFP-10 induce strong T-cell IFN-γ responses [27, 29–31], prompting their proposed use as diagnostic markers for M. tuberculosis and M. bovis infections [25, 32, 33]. However, the presence of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 orthologues in other mycobacterial species, including non-pathogenic species such as M. smegmatis and M. gastri [34] and environmental species like M. flavescens [28] has raised some concerns regarding the potential use of these antigens as diagnostic markers [35]. Paradoxically, the presence of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 in other mycobacterial species does not seem to confound the detection of M. tuberculosis- and M. bovis-associated specific responses in clinical and epidemiological practice [29, 30, 32, 36–38], although these studies were mostly performed in low-incidence settings and patients may not have had significant previous contact with non-tuberculous mycobacteria. A study by Arend et al [39] showed that when ESAT-6 and/or CFP-10 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT) were used to measure interferon-gamma production, most M. kansasii- or M. marinum-infected patients and several persons exposed to environmental mycobacteria responded to ESAT-6 and/or CFP-10. IFN-γ production by T cells from leprosy patients, TB patients and unexposed controls in response to the M. leprae homologue of CFP-10 also showed significant crossreactivity with CFP-10 of M. tuberculosis [40].

In the present study, we evaluated ESAT-6 and CFP-10 for use in the interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) ELISPOT assay for diagnosis of mycobacterial infections in baboons held in a research facility in South Africa after the death of one baboon due to TB.

Methods

Baboons

Ninety wild-caught Chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) were involved in this study. Of these, 34 baboons had been newly introduced into the colony from the wild, while the other 56, including the one that died of M. tuberculosis infection, had been kept in the colony for over 3 years. Of the 56 baboons, 10 had been sensitised to BCG by experimental inoculation, 2 to 3 years prior to the current study. Ethical approval for the experimentation on the baboons was obtained from the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Cape Town.

Tuberculin Skin test

Baboons were anaesthetised with ketamine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg body mass; intramuscular injection) and injected intradermally with 100 μL (1000 IU in saline) of bovine tuberculin PPD (Institute of Animal Science and Health, Lelystad, The Netherlands) in the upper palpebrum of the eyelid. Reaction to tuberculin was checked by visual observation at 24, 48 and 72 hours and interpreted as TST positive or negative. The TST positivity reactions comprised of erythema of palpebrum alone, various degrees of erythema with minimum swelling or slight swelling of palpebrum without erythema, and obvious swelling of palpebrum with drooping of the eyelid or swelling and/or necrosis of the palpebrum with eyelid closed. Bruise-extravasation of blood associated with injection of tuberculin or no detectable reaction on the palpebrum were interpreted as TST negative.

IFN-γ ELISPOT assay

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from heparinised blood by standard Ficoll-gradient centrifugation. Freshly isolated or cryo-preserved PBMC were used in a standard IFN-γ ELISPOT assay as previously described [41]. Briefly, ELISPOT plates (MultiScreen-IP, Millipore) were coated overnight at 4°C with purified anti-human IFN-γ monoclonal antibody (clone 1-D1K, Mabtech). PBMC were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in triplicate at 200,000 cells per well with PPD (4 μg/mL), ESAT-6 (4 μg/mL), or CFP-10 (4 μg/mL) as the stimulant in a total volume of 0.1 mL. Triplicate wells with cells and PHA (4 μg/mL) and culture medium alone, served as positive and background stimulation controls respectively. The average of triplicate counts of IFN-γ spot forming cells (SFC) was calculated for each stimulant and normalised to 106 PBMC to give IFN-γ SFC/106 PBMC. The results were reported as net IFN-γ SFC/106 PBMC after subtracting the background SFC/106 PBMC obtained in the absence of any stimulant (PBMC plus culture medium alone).

To determine if a response was positive, a cut-off value was established for PPD, ESAT-6 and CFP-10 using PBMC from 27 TST negative healthy baboons whose background response or response to ESAT-6 or CFP-10 was <50 IFN-γ SFC/106 PBMC. The cut-off value was defined as the mean net IFN-γ SFC/106 PBMC after subtracting the value of background reaction plus 3 standard deviations of the mean or twice the highest value of background reaction, whichever was greater. The mean net responses plus three standard deviations for PPD, ESAT-6 and CFP-10 were 8 + 35, 12 + 31 and 5 + 22 IFN-γ SFC/106 PBMC respectively while the highest value of background reactions were 43, 35 and 30. Thus, the cut-off values for PPD, ESAT-6 and CFP-10 were determined as 86, 70 and 60 IFN-γ SFC/106 PBMC, respectively. The mean background stimulation in the absence of any stimulant and in response to the PHA positive controls were 5 ± 4 and 1562 ± 697 SFC/106 PBMC respectively.

Euthanasia and necropsy

Baboons with a positive TST were euthanased for necropsy using sodium pentobarbital (200 mg/kg body mass). In addition, baboons that were caged adjacent to those which were found to have tubercles at necropsy (here referred to as contact baboons) were also euthanased for necropsy. All the TST-positive baboons had been kept in the colony for over 3 years while 6 of 8 contact baboons were less than 3 months in the colony. Before euthanasia, blood for PBMC isolation was collected from these animals. Also, as part of ongoing research, cryo-preserved PBMC were available from some of these animals. Organs in the thoracic and abdominal cavities were examined macroscopically for the presence of tubercles, adhesions or enlargement and/or caseation of lymph nodes. Samples for histology, mycobacteria-specific staining and culture were taken from the lung tissue and/or bronchial lymph nodes (BLN).

Histology, ZN test and M. tuberculosis immunoperoxidase staining

Tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and sent to a veterinary pathologist (VetPath; Pretoria) for histological examination, Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) and M. tuberculosis immunoperoxidase (MTIP) staining.

Mycobacteria culture and identification

Fresh tissues from the lung and/or BLN collected at necropsy were cultured for mycobacterial culture, using standard methods in the TB research laboratory of the Stellenbosch University. Standard precautions were followed to limit cross-contamination. All cultures were genotyped by the IS6110 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) method [42]. Isolates were also typed according to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex typing method developed in our laboratory [43]. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex negative samples were further subjected to a 5'-16S rRNA gene PCR-sequencing assay, which is able to identify and speciate Mycobacterium spp. [44, 45]. Used in combination these methods would be able to identify superinfections between mycobacterial species of MTC and MAC.

Results

Tuberculin Skin test

Following the death of one baboon (B662) due to pulmonary TB diagnosed at necropsy, the remaining 89 baboons in the colony were screened for mycobacterial infection using bovine PPD tuberculin. Initially, only eight baboons tested positive, including three (B454, B536 & B548) with known prior vaccination with BCG or recombinant BCG. One additional baboon (B369) tested positive three months after initially testing negative, resulting in a total of nine tuberculin reactors (Figure 1 and Table 1). The test reaction ranged from severe (drooping of the eyelid, necrosis of the palpebrum with eyelid completely closed; B524, B531 & B629) to slight reactions (erythema of palpebrum with minimal swelling; B369, B454, B536 & B548). Reactions on eyelids of baboon B659 and B697 were moderate (obvious swelling of palpebrum without drooping or necrosis).
Table 1

Summary of findings

TST status

Baboon number

IFN-γ ELISPOT (SFC/106 PBMC)#

Pathology (lungs and BLN)

Special staining

Mycobacteria culture

  

PPD

ESAT6

CFP10

Necropsy

Histopathology

ZN

MT IP

 

TST positive baboons

B454Ψ

902

774

157

Negative

No granulomas; mild interstitial lymphocytic infiltration in BLN

+ (BLN only)

Negative

Negative

 

B524

2650

2163

2243

Several tubercles; caseous LN

Multifocal necrogranulomas

Negative

+

M. tuberculosis

 

B531

210

89

109

Several tubercles; caseous LN

Multifocal necrogranulomas; caseous necrosis in BLN

+

+

M. tuberculosis

 

B536Ψ

743

20

11

Negative

No granulomas; mild peribronchial fibrosis;

+

Negative

Negative

 

B548Ψ

ND

ND

ND

Negative

ND

ND

ND

Negative

 

B629

736

448

1348

Several tubercles; caseous LN

Multifocal necrogranulomas

+

Negative

M. tuberculosis

 

B659

ND

ND

ND

Single tubercle; single caseous LN

ND

ND

ND

M. tuberculosis

 

B697

1748

0

0

A single tubercle-like lesion; enlarged hilar LN

Multifocal areas of granulomatous pneumonia

Negative

Negative

Negative

 

B369*

1397

1192

1170

Negative

No granumomas; focal hyperplasia in BLN

Negative

Negative

M. intracellulare

TST negative baboons

B630

0

35

48

Negative

No granulomas; mild lymphatic hyperplasia in BLN

Negative

Negative

Negative

 

B673

ND

ND

ND

Single caseous LN

Multifocal mild pneumonitis

+

+

M. tuberculosis

 

B679

0

67

109

Negative

No granulomas; mild multifocal perivascular lymphocytic cuffing

Negative

Negative

Negative

 

B689

78

117

63

Negative

Negative

Negative

Negative

Negative

 

B694

0

86

66

Negative

Mild granulomatous inflammation

Negative

Negative

M. intracellulare

 

B696

0

69

17

Negative

Negative

Negative

Negative

Negative

 

B704

2

28

33

Negative

Negative

Negative

Negative

Negative

 

B709

50

60

138

Negative

Negative

Negative

Negative

M. intracellulare

This table gives a summary of the major findings of the study. ND: not determined; BLN: bronchial lymph node; +: positive outcome; *: initially TST negative; Ψ: known prior vaccination with BCG or recombinant BCG; #: cut-off values for PPD, ESAT-6 & CFP-10 = 86, 70, & 60 SFC/106 respectively (bold face indicate a positive response).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Summary of the TST, ESAT-6 and CFP-10 IFN-γ ELISPOT assay and mycobacterial culture outcome. A flow diagram showing the outcome of tuberculin skin test (TST), ESAT-6 and CFP-10 IFN-γ ELISPOT assay and mycobacterial culture.

Necropsy

The nine TST reactors and an additional eight contact baboons were euthanased for necropsy and further investigations. Of the nine TST positive baboons, four had classical tubercles in the lungs including at least one caseous BLN, one had a non-classical tubercle-like lesion (B697) with an enlarged but not caseous BLN and four had no macroscopic lesions (Table 1). Paradoxically, one of eight TST negative baboons (B673) had a single caseous BLN with no visible tubercles. The severity of lesions varied widely, ranging from numerous small tubercles in the lungs and one or more caseous BLN (B524, B531 and B629) to just a single caseous BLN (B673). These macroscopic lesions were restricted to the pulmonary system.

Histology, ZN test and M. tuberculosis immunoperoxidase staining

As shown in the Table 1, necrotic granulomas and areas of necrosis were found in the lung and BLN tissues of three of nine TST positive baboons while other lesions such as lymphocytic infiltration and granulomatous inflammation, suggestive of mycobacterial infection, were found in four other TST reactors. Also, five of seven histologic lesions were confirmed by ZN and MTIP staining. For the TST negative baboons, only mild histological lesions were found in four of eight baboons and one (B673) was positive by ZN and MTIP staining.

Mycobacterial culture and identification

Of the 17 baboons' specimens that were cultured, eight yielded mycobacterial growth. M. tuberculosis was identified in five and M. intracellulare in three of these cultures by PCR-based methods and 16S rRNA sequencing. M. tuberculosis was cultured from four of the nine TST reactors and one of eight TST negative baboons while M. intracellulare was cultured from one TST reactor and two TST negative baboons (Figure 1 and Table 1). It was unlikely that the culture of M. intracellulare represented laboratory cross-contamination as this species is rarely identified in sputum specimens routinely cultured in our laboratory. No superinfection was detected in any of these samples.

IFN-γ ELISPOT assay

PBMC were isolated from some baboons at the time of TST or just before euthanasia for determination of IFN-γ ELISPOT response to bovine PPD, ESAT-6 and CFP-10. As shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, PPD ELISPOT test was positive for all TST positive reactors and negative for all TST non-reactors, indicating agreement between these two tests. However, two of the tuberculin reactors (B536 and B697) were negative for both ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT test. The mycobacterial culture in these animals was also negative. The ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT test was positive for B454, another TST reactor which had previously been vaccinated with BCG, although no mycobacteria was isolated from tissues from this animal. The ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT test was also positive for B369, which was initially TST negative and mycobacteria culture positive for M. intracellulare. For the TST non-reactors, ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT test was positive for four baboons, two (B694 and B709) from which M. intracellulare was isolated. However, no mycobacteria was isolated from the other two baboons (B679 and B689), which were also positive by ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT.

In an attempt to understand the kinetics of immune responses to M. tuberculosis and M. intracellulare, we performed retrospective measurements of T-cell IFN-γ responses in an ELISPOT assay using cryo-preserved PBMC, previously obtained from baboons B369 and B662. As depicted in Figure 2, the responses to ESAT-6 for B369 could be detected as early as 18 weeks before euthanasia but the PPD (and CFP-10) responses were detectable only 6 weeks later. Thus, the TST was initially negative at 16 weeks before euthanasia although the ELISPOT assay value was above the positive cut-off value for ESAT-6 (but not PPD and CFP-10). This delay in induction of a PPD response was not observed for B662 that died of TB.
Figure 2
Figure 2

IFN-γ ELISPOT responses to mycobacterial proteins at various times prior to death (B662) or euthanasia (B369). Three mycobacterial antigen preparations (bovine PPD, ESAT-6 and CFP-10) were used in IFN-γ ELISPOT assay using cryo-preserved PBMC from baboon B662 (infected with M. tuberculosis) and B369 (infected with M. intracellulare). The IFN-γ response to each protein was determined by subtracting the background (response to PBMC in the culture medium only) from the antigen response. Data points are the magnitudes of response to each antigen preparation at various time points. The dotted lines indicate the cut-off value for ESAT-6 (70 IFN-γ SFC/106 PBMC).

Discussion

The TST, which is a delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction, is partially T cell-mediated [46] and IFN-γ plays a major role [47]. The major drawback of this test is the inability to distinguish active pathogenic infection from healthy carrier status, or from non-pathogenic exposure to environmental mycobacteria or BCG. The majority of TB outbreaks in NHP are associated with human contact or TB infected animals and carcasses [9, 10, 12] and rarely give rise to latent TB infection [11]. Thus, MTC infections in NHP are considered progressive and almost always fatal. However, infection with MAC is usually chronic [14–17] and sometimes refractory to TST [16]. In order to eliminate their zoonotic potential, early and reliable detection of potential pathogenic mycobacterial infections, including members of MAC in the nonhuman primate colonies is crucial.

Both ESAT-6 and CFP-10 have been proposed as diagnostic markers for pathogenic infection caused by M. tuberculosis and M. bovis in human and animals [25, 31–33] because they are well defined antigens [24–26], absent from BCG vaccine strains and some non-pathogenic environmental mycobacteria [28, 36], and they associate in M. tuberculosis-exposed people with a higher risk of developing active tuberculosis [29, 30].

In our study, the IFN-γ ELISPOT response to ESAT-6, CFP10 and PPD were compared to the TST. There was concordance between the TST and PPD ELISPOT tests. However the results for ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT and TST were discordant in two of seven TST-positive and four of seven TST-negative animals. One of the two TST-positive but ESAT-6 and CFP-10 negative baboon (B536) could be a result of previous exposure to BCG via inoculation with a recombinant BCG vaccine 2–3 years previously, but the other baboon (B697) possibly represents environmental sensitisation as this animal had been caught from the wild less than 3 months before the test and had no known exposure to BCG. This outcome demonstrates that ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT test is capable of distinguishing BCG vaccination and environmental exposure by non-pathogenic mycobacterial infection (or TST false-positives) from TB disease. However, ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT test for another TST-positive baboon (B454) that had previously been vaccinated with BCG, was not conclusive as no mycobacteria was isolated from tissues from this animal. It was noteworthy that one M. intracellulare infection (B369) was detected by both TST and ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT tests. Since the methods used to identify and speciate the mycobacteria excluded the possibility of superinfection with M. tuberculosis, this result suggests a cross-reactivity between M. tuberculosis-derived ESAT-6 and CFP-10 antigens and M. intracellulare. Paradoxically, TST failed to detect two other M. intracellulare-infected baboons (B694 and B704), possibly because the stage of infection in these animals were too early for the PPD-specific T responses to have developed.

Our data on the kinetics of immune responses induced by M. tuberculosis and M. intracellulare show that induction of PPD responses occurs much later than that of ESAT-6 in case of M. intracellulare infection. Thus, it is possible for TST to miss early M. intracellulare infection, as we observed in this study. However, the isolation of M. intracellulare from two other TST-negative but ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT-positive baboons (B694 and B709) casts some doubt regarding the specificity of this ELIPOT test. This needs to be resolved by further investigation using larger sample sizes.

Although limited by the small sample size and an assumed exposure in the in-contact baboons, the findings in this study indicate that the ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT assays were highly effective in detecting M. tuberculosis and M. intracellulare infections (although the detection of M. intracellulare was unsuspected and ostensibly indicates cross-reactivity). Further, these results show the ability of this method to distinguish BCG vaccination from infection with these mycobacteria. In addition, our results show that the TST failed to detect two infections with M. intracellulare and one infection with M. tuberculosis. We further show that T-cell responses to ESAT-6 and CFP-10 develop much earlier than those of PPD, especially in M. intracellulare infection and hypothesise that this could possibly facilitate earlier diagnosis of mycobacterial infection by ELISPOT test.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that the traditional TST can manifest significant false-negatives in screening for tuberculosis in NHP while the ESAT-6 and CFP-10 ELISPOT assays are highly effective in detecting M. tuberculosis and M. intracellulare infections, thus facilitating an improvement in identifying and controlling a potential zoonotic transmission hazard, especially where NHP are infected with M. intracellulare. The study also presents the first evidence of cross-reactivity between M. tuberculosis ESAT-6 and CFP-10 and M. intracellulare antigens, where animals infected with M. intracellulare react to ESAT-6 and CFP-10 of M. tuberculosis. Whilst this study may support the use of an ESAT-6 or CFP-10 IFN-γ ELISPOT assay to screen for tuberculosis in NHP facilities, a positive result may arise from infection by mycobacteria other than M. tuberculosis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr John Austin for performing the autopsies and Dr Sharon Makhubela for technical assistance with ELISPOT assays. The study was supported by funds from the South African AIDS Vaccine Initiative (SAAVI), the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the National Research Foundation (NRF). RJW is supported by the Wellcome Trust and European Union.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa
(2)
Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence in Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, US/MRC Centre for Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 19063, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa
(3)
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa
(4)
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
(5)
Wellcome Trust Centre for Research in Clinical Tropical Medicine, Division of Medicine, Wright Fleming Institute, Imperial College, London, W2 1PG, UK
(6)
MRC/UCT Liver Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
(7)
National Health Laboratory Service, Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa

References

  1. Cosivi O, Grange JM, Daborn CJ, Raviglione MC, Fujikura T, Cousins D, Robinson RA, Huchzermeyer HF, de Kantor I, Meslin FX: Zoonotic tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998, 4: 59-70.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Morris RS, Pfeiffer DU, Jackson R: The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections. Vet Microbiol. 1994, 40: 153-177. 10.1016/0378-1135(94)90053-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Raviglione MC, Snider DE, Kochi A: Global epidemiology of tuberculosis. Morbidity and mortality of a worldwide epidemic. JAMA. 1995, 273: 220-226. 10.1001/jama.273.3.220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pollock JM, Neill SD: Mycobacterium bovis infection and tuberculosis in cattle. Vet J. 2002, 163: 115-127. 10.1053/tvjl.2001.0655.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Primm TP, Lucero CA, Christie A, Falkinham JO: Health impacts of environmental mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17: 98-106. 10.1128/CMR.17.1.98-106.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. F Boschiroli ML, Thorel MF, Guilloteau LA: Zoonotic aspects of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC). Vet Res. 2005, 36: 411-436. 10.1051/vetres:2005001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Horsburgh CR: Mycobacterium avium complex infection in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991, 324: 1332-1338.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Nightingale SD, Byrd LT, Southern PM, Jockusch JD, Cal SX, Wynne BA: Incidence of Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex bacteremia in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients. J Infect Dis. 1992, 162: 1082-1085.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fourie PB, Odendaal MW: Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a closed colony of baboons (Papio ursinus). Lab Anim. 1983, 17: 125-128. 10.1258/002367783780959376.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Keet DF, Kriek NP, Bengis RG, Grobler DG, Michel A: The rise and fall of tuberculosis in a free-ranging chacma baboon troop in the Kruger National Park. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2000, 67: 115-122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Martino M, Hubbard GB, Schlabritz-Loutsevitch N: Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium tuberculosis) in a pregnant baboon (Papio cynocephalus). J Med Primatol. 2007, 36: 108-112. 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2006.00166.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sapolsky RM, Else JC: Bovine tuberculosis in a wild baboon population: epidemiological aspects. J Med Primatol. 1987, 16: 229-235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Thorel MF, Karoui C, Varnerot A, Fleury C, Vincent V: Isolation of Mycobacterium bovis from baboons, leopards, and a sea-lion. Vet Res. 1998, 29: 207-212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Holmberg CA, Henrickson R, Lenninger R, Anderson J, Hayashi L, Ellingsworth L: Immunological abnormality in a group of Macaca arctoides with high mortality due to atypical mycobacterial and other disease processes. Am J Vet Res. 1985, 46: 1192-1196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Maslow JN, Braar I, Smith G, Newman GW, Mehta R, Thornton C, Didier P: Latent infection as a source of disseminated disease by organisms of the Mycobacterium avium complex in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus macaques. J Infect Dis. 2003, 187: 1748-1755. 10.1086/374985.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleischman RW, du Moulin GC, Esber HJ, Ilievski V, Bogden AE: Nontuberculous mycobacterial infection attributable to Mycobacterium intracellulare serotype 10 in two rhesus monkeys. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1982, 181: 1358-1362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Holmberg CA, Henrickson RV, Malaga C, Schneider R, Gribble D: Nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in rhesus monkeys. Vet Pathol Suppl. 1982, 9-16. Suppl 7Google Scholar
  18. Huebner RE, Schein MF, Bass JB: The tuberculin skin test. Clin Infect Dis. 1993, 17: 968-975.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chaparas SD, Maloney CJ, Hedrick SR: Specificity of tuberculins and antigens from various species of mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1970, 101: 74-83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ami Y, Izumi Y, Matsuo T, Someya K, Kanekiyo M, Horibata S, Yoshino N, Sakai K, Shinohara K, Matsumoto S, Yamada T, Yamazali S, Yamamoto N, Honda M: Priming-boosting vaccination with recombinant Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin and a nonreplicating vaccinia virus recombinant leads to long-lasting and effective immunity. J Virol. 2005, 79: 12871-12879. 10.1128/JVI.79.20.12871-12879.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Honda M, Matsuo K, Nakasone T, Okamoto Y, Yoshizaki H, Kitamura K, Sugiura W, Watanabe K, Fukushima Y, Haga S, Katsura Y, Tasaka H, Komuro K, Yamada T, Asano T, Yamazaki A, Yamazaki S: Protective immune responses induced by secretion of a chimeric soluble protein from a recombinant Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin vector candidate vaccine for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in small animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 10693-10697. 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10693.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yasutomi Y, Koeing S, Haun SS, Stover CK, Jackson RK, Conard P, Conley AJ, Emini EA, Fuerst TR, Letvin NL: Immunization with recombinant BCG-SIV elicits SIV-specific cytotoxic Tlymphocytes in rhesus monkey. J Immunol. 1993, 150: 3101-3107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yasutomi Y, Koenig S, Woods RM, Madsen J, Wassef NM, Alving CR, Klein HJ, Nolan TE, Boots LJ, Kessler JA, Emini EA, Conley AJ, Letvin NL: A vaccine-elicited, single viral epitope-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte response does not protect against intravenous, cell-free simian immunodeficiency virus challenge. J Virol. 1995, 69: 2279-2284.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gey van Pittius NC, Gamieldien J, Hide W, Brown GD, Siezen RJ, Beyers AD: The ESAT-6 gene cluster of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other high G+C Gram-positive bacteria. Genome Biol. 2001, 2: 44.1-44.18. 10.1186/gb-2001-2-10-research0044.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Munk ME, Arend SM, Brock I, Ottenhoff TH, Andersen P: Use of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 antigens for diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2001, 183: 178-176. 10.1086/317663.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Mustafa AS, Oftung F, Amoudy HA, Madi NM, Abal AT, Shaban F, Rosen Krands I, Andersen P: Multiple epitopes from the Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESAT-6 antigen are recognized by antigen-specific human T cell lines. Clin Infect Dis. 2000, 30 (Suppl 3): S201-S205. 10.1086/313862.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sorensen AL, Nagai S, Houen G, Andersen P, Andersen AB: Purification and characterization of a low-molecular-mass T-cell antigen secreted by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect and Immun. 1995, 63: 1710-1717.Google Scholar
  28. Harboe M, Oettinger T, Wiker HG, Rosenkrands I, Andersen P: Evidence for occurrence of the ESAT-6 protein in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and virulent Mycobacterium bovis and for its absence in Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Infect Immun. 1996, 64: 19-22.Google Scholar
  29. Demissie A, Wassie L, Abebe M, Aseffa A, Rook G, Zumla A, Andersen P, Doherty TM, VACSEL Study Group: The 6-kilodalton early secreted antigenic target-responsive, asymptomatic contacts of tuberculosis patients express elevated levels of interleukin-4 and reduced levels of gamma interferon. Infect Immun. 2006, 74: 2817-2822. 10.1128/IAI.74.5.2817-2822.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Vekemans J, Ota MO, Sillah J, Fielding K, Alderson MR, Skeiky YA, Dalemans W, McAdam KP, Lienhardt C, Marchant A: Immune responses to mycobacterial antigens in the Gambian population: implications for vaccines and immunodiagnostic test design. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 381-388. 10.1128/IAI.72.1.381-388.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vordermeier HM, Chambers MA, Cockle PJ, Whelan AO, Simmons J, Hewinson RG: Correlation of ESAT-6-specific gamma interferon production with pathology in cattle following Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination against experimental bovine tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 3026-3032. 10.1128/IAI.70.6.3026-3032.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Buddle BM, Ryan TJ, Pollock JM, Andersen P, de Lisle GW: Use of ESAT-6 in the interferon-gamma test for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis following skin testing. Vet Microbiol. 2001, 80: 37-46. 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00375-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. van Pinxteren LA, Ravn P, Agger EM, Pollock J, Andersen P: Diagnosis of tuberculosis based on the two specific antigens ESAT-6 and CFP-10. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000, 7: 155-160. 10.1128/CDLI.7.2.155-160.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Colangeli R, Spencer JS, Bifani P, Williams A, Lyashchenko K, Keen MA, Hill PJ, Belisle J, Gennaro ML: MTSA-10, the product of the Rv3874 gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, elicits tuberculosis-specific, delayed-type hypersensitivity in guinea pigs. Infect Immun. 2000, 68: 990-993. 10.1128/IAI.68.2.990-993.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gey van Pittius NC, Warren RM, van Helden PD: Letter to the Editor. ESAT-6 and CFP-10: What is the Diagnosis?. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 6509-6510. 10.1128/IAI.70.11.6509-6511.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Arend SM, Geluk A, van Maijgaarden KE, van Dissel JT, Theisen M, Andersen P, Ottenhoff TH: Antigenic equivalence of human T-cell responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific RD1-encoded protein antigens ESAT-6 and culture filtrate protein 10 and to mixtures of synthetic peptides. Infect Immun. 2000, 68: 3314-3321. 10.1128/IAI.68.6.3314-3321.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Arend SM, Andersen P, van Maijgaarden KE, Skjot RL, Subronto YW, van Dissel JT, Ottenhoff TH: Detection of active tuberculosis infection by T cell responses to early-secreted antigenic target 6-kDa protein and culture filtrate protein 10. J Infect Dis. 2000, 181: 1850-1854. 10.1086/315448.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lein AD, von Reyn CF, Ravn P, Horsburgh CR, Alexander LN, Andersen P: Cellular immune responses to ESAT-6 discriminate between patients with pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex and those with pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999, 6: 606-609.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Arend SM, van Meijgaarden KE, de Boer K, de Palou EC, van Soolingen D, Ottenhoff TH, van Dissel JT: Tuberculin skin testing and in vitro T cell responses to ESAT-6 and culture filtrate protein 10 after infection with Mycobacterium marinum or M. kansasii. J Infect Dis. 2002, 186: 1797-1807. 10.1086/345760.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Geluk A, van Maijgaarden KE, Franken KL, Wieles B, Arend SM, Faber WR, Naafs B, Ottenhoff TH: Immunological crossreactivity of the Mycobacterium leprae CFP-10 with its homologue in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Scand J Immunol. 2004, 59: 66-70. 10.1111/j.0300-9475.2004.01358.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Chege GK, Williamson A-L, Passmore JS, Bourn W, Ryffel B, Shephard EG: The immune response of the Chacma baboon to Bacille Calmette Guerin: development of a primate model for BCG-based vaccine research. Vaccine. 2005, 23: 5783-5791. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. van Embden JD, Cave MD, Crawford JT, Dale JW, Eisenach KD, Gicquel B, Hermans P, Martin C, McAdam R, Shinnick TM, Small PM: Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1993, 31: 406-409.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Warren RM, Gey van Pittius NC, Barnard M, Hesseling A, Erskine M, de Kock M, Gutierrez MC, Chege GK, Victor TC, Hoal EG, van Helden PD: Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by PCR amplification of genomic regions of difference. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006, 10: 818-822.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Harmsen D, Dostal S, Roth A, Niemann S, Rothganger J, Sammeth M, Albert J, Frosch M, Richter E: RIDOM: comprehensive and public sequence database for identification of Mycobacterium species. BMC Infect Dis. 2003, 3: 26-10.1186/1471-2334-3-26.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hughes MS, Ball NW, McCarroll J, Erskine M, Taylor MJ, Pollock JM, Skuce RA, Neill SD: Molecular analyses of mycobacteria other than the M. tuberculosis complex isolated from Northern Ireland cattle. Vet Microbiol. 2005, 108: 101-112. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.03.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Black CA: Delayed type hypersensitivity: current theories with an historic perspective. Dermatol Online J. 1999, 5: 7-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Seabrook TK, Borron PJ, Dudler L, Young AJ: A novel mechanism of immune regulation: interferon-γ regulates retention of CD4+ T cells during delayed type hypersensitivity. Immunology. 2005, 116: 184-192. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02209.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chege et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us