- Research article
- Open Access
The expression and antigenicity of a truncated spike-nucleocapsid fusion protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus
- Feng Mu†1,
- Dongsheng Niu†2,
- Jingsong Mu†3,
- Bo He1,
- Weiguo Han2,
- Baoxing Fan4,
- Shengyong Huang1,
- Yan Qiu5,
- Bo You1 and
- Weijun Chen1Email author
© Mu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Received: 25 June 2008
- Accepted: 28 November 2008
- Published: 28 November 2008
In the absence of effective drugs, controlling SARS relies on the rapid identification of cases and appropriate management of the close contacts, or effective vaccines for SARS. Therefore, developing specific and sensitive laboratory tests for SARS as well as effective vaccines are necessary for national authorities.
Genes encoding truncated nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) proteins of SARSCoV were cloned into the expression vector pQE30 and fusionally expressed in Escherichia coli M15. The fusion protein was analyzed for reactivity with SARS patients' sera and with anti-sera against the two human coronaviruses HCoV 229E and HCoV OC43 by ELISA, IFA and immunoblot assays. Furthermore, to evaluate the antigen-specific humoral antibody and T-cell responses in mice, the fusion protein was injected into 6-week-old BALB/c mice and a neutralization test as well as a T-cell analysis was performed. To evaluate the antiviral efficacy of immunization, BALB/c mice were challenged intranasally with SARSCoV at day 33 post injection and viral loads were determined by fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR. Serological results showed that the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the truncated S-N fusion protein derived the SARS virus were > 99% (457/460) and 100.00% (650/650), respectively. Furthermore there was no cross-reactivity with other two human coronaviruses. High titers of antibodies to SRASCoV appeared in the immunized mice and the neutralization test showed that antibodies to the fusion protein could inhibit SARSCoV. The T cell proliferation showed that the fusion protein could induce an antigen-specific T-cell response. Fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR showed that BALB/c mice challenged intranasally with SARSCoV at day 33 post injection were completely protected from virus replication.
The truncated S-N fusion protein is a suitable immunodiagnostic antigen and vaccine candidate.
- Fusion Protein
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
- Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Patient
The epidemic of severe atypical pneumonia, designated "severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)" by the World Health Organization (WHO) and first observed in Guangdong Province of China in November 2002, affected 8422 people and caused 916 deaths in 33 countries and areas worldwide up to August 7, 2003 [1, 2]. A novel coronavirus, SARS-associated coronavirus (SARSCoV), was confirmed as the pathogen [3–6]. In the absence of effective drugs, controlling this disease relies on the rapid identification of cases and appropriate management of the close contacts, or effective vaccines against SARS. Therefore, the development of both specific and sensitive laboratory tests for SARS as well as effective vaccines is necessary for national authorities.
Laboratory tests for SARS based on indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) or viral particle lysate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (SARSCoV lysate ELISA) to detect antibodies against SARSCoV are important methods . However, these methods both require cultivation of SARSCoV in a biosafety level 3 or 4 laboratory, which is both dangerous and difficult. Finding a suitable diagnostic test for this virus therefore remains a high priority. A practical approach towards this goal is to clone and express the immunodominant genes of SARSCoV.
Several studies have shown that most of the antigenic epitopes of SARSCoV are located on the nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) proteins and that the latter protein has an important role in viral entry and pathogenesis [8–12]. Other data have shown that the viral N and S proteins of coronaviruses could induce a specific T cell response [13–16]. Here, we report the cloning and expression of a truncated S-N fusion protein of SARSCoV and the investigation of its antigenicity and immunogenicity.
Viruses and vectors
The pQE30 vector was purchased from Qiagen (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Escherichia coli M15 was used as host strain for the vector. The following virus strains were kindly provided by the Academy of Military Medical Science and the National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products: The SARSCoV (BJ01); SARSCoV (GD01); human coronavirus 229E (HCoV 229E) and human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV OC43). All work with infectious virus was performed in a biosafety level 3 laboratory.
Construction of recombinant expression plasmids
Primers used for target gene by RT-PCR
PCR product (bp)
5'- cgc ggatcc tct gat aat gga ccc ca -3'
5'- gc ctgcag tta tgc ctg agt tga atc agc aga -3'
5'- cgc ggatcc gct aca gtc aaa tgg gct gat -3'
5'- ccc gtcgac tta gtt tac ttc atc aat tat -3'
5'- cgc ggatcc tct ttt act cct ggt aag caa -3'
5'- ccc aagctt tta tat ttc tga ggt gtc ttc -3'
5'- cgc ggtacc att ggc atg gaa gtc aca -3'
5'- ccc ctgcag tta tgc ctg agt tga atc agc aga -3'
5'- cgc ggatcc gtt tcc aaa gag tca ggc aac -3'
5'- ccc gtcgac tta gtt tac ttc atc aat tat -3'
5'- cgc ggatcc tta gag ttg gcc aaa gtg -3'
5'- ccc aagctt tta tat ttc tga ggt gtc ttc -3'
5'- cgc ggatcc ctc aag tat gat gaa aat ggt aca atc aca -3'
5'- gc ggtacc aga cat agt ata agc cac aat aga -3'
Expression and purification of the recombinant proteins
SARS patients' sera: 460 serum samples from SARS convalescents (from 35 to 114 days after the onset of illness) fulfilling the clinical WHO case definition of SARS, and whose diagnosis was subsequently confirmed by seroconversion, were collected in 301 Hospital (Beijing, China) and 302 Hospital (Beijing, China). All sera were tested positive by the SARSCoV lysate ELISA IgG Kit (Beijing BGI-GBI Biotech Corp.), which has been approved by the State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) for the detection of anti-SARSCoV immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibody from human serum or plasma specimens.
Sera from 650 Healthy blood donors were collected by the Beijing Red Cross blood center from May to October 2003.
Polyclonal mouse sera against SARSCoV (BJ01), HCoV 229E and HCoV OC43 were prepared in our laboratory (IFA dilution: 1:5120, 1:5120, 1:10240, respectively) as were polyclonal mouse sera against purified recombinant proteins SARSCoV N, HCoV OC43 N, HCoV 229E N (IFA dilution: 1:5120, 1:2560, 1:5120, respectively). Control sera were collected from healthy BALB/c mice.
Mouse immunization was performed according to established protocols . Briefly, sixteen 6-week-old BALB/c mice were divided into 2 groups and injected subcutaneously with 0.1 mL of purified recombinant fusion truncated S-N protein solution (100 μg/mL) and PBS, respectively, both mixed with an equal volume of paraffin oil. Immunized mice were boosted after 24 days using the half dose of antigen by celiac arterial route.
An immunoblot analysis was performed as described in detail elsewhere . SDS-PAGE analysis was performed using the Mini-protein 3 Electrophoresis System (BIO-RAD). The stacking gel and separation gel contained 5% and 15% acrylamide, respectively. Electrophoresis was carried out at a constant voltage of 120 V for 180 min. The proteins were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. The mouse sera were then tested against each of the recombinant proteins.
An indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was performed to detect antibodies to SARSCoV (BJ01), HCoV 229E and HCoV OC43 by using SARSCoV according to established protocols .
Microtiter plates (96 wells, Shenzhen Jinchanhua Co. Ltd) were coated overnight at 4°C with either of the eight recombinant antigens (four recombinant antigens of SARSCoV: truncated S protein, N protein, truncated N protein, and truncated S-N fusion protein; two recombinant antigens of HCoV 229E: truncated N protein, N protein; two recombinant antigens of HCoV OC43: truncated N protein, N protein) diluted in 50 mM NaHCO3 buffer (pH 9.6). Each well was rinsed with PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) containing 0.05% Tween-20 and 3% BSA for blocking the remaining protein-binding sites. After incubation at 37°C for 1 hour, the plates were washed five times with the PBS/Tween-20 buffer. Diluted serum samples (1:10 with PBS) were added to the plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 30 min and washed five times with the PBS/Tween-20 buffer. After addition of peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (diluted 1:2000 in PBS supplemented with 0.5% of Tween-20 and 1.5% of BSA) to each well and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 30 min, then washed five times with the PBS/Tween-20 buffer before the addition of tetramethyl-benzidine (TMB)/hydrogen peroxide substrate. Reaction was stopped by addition of 2 M H2SO4. The OD450/630 value was measured with a microtiter plate reader in triplicates. A blank control, a negative control and a positive control were always included on each plate. The cut-off values for IgG were 0.16 (three N proteins), 0.12 (truncated S protein), 0.14 (three truncated N proteins), 0.12 (truncated S-N protein), respectively, which were calculated as the mean + 2 SD of the readings given by 1000 blood donor control sera collected from 2001 to 2002 in Beijing. Samples were tested again in triplicates when their OD450/630 values were near the cut-off values. For the detection of mice antibodies, all procedures were the same as for detection of human antibodies except that peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mice IgG diluted to 1:1000 was used. Mice sera were diluted to 1:20 with PBS.
Neutralizing titer (NT) of mouse sera was measured by a rapid microneutralization assay . In brief, heat-inactivated (55°C for 30 min) mouse immune serum was diluted tenfold and then serially diluted twofold to 1:2560 in DMEM (Gibco) containing 5% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (56°C for 30 min). Approximately 50 μL of SARSCoV (BJ01 strain) (400 TCID50/100 μL) was mixed with an equal volume of diluted serum and incubated at 35°C for 1 h; then 50 uL of the mixture (containing 100 TCID50) and 50 μL of DMEM containing 5% inactivated fetal calf serum were added onto a VeroE6 cell monolayer in triplicate. The viral cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed on days 2 and 3. The dilution of serum that completely prevented CPE in 50% of the wells was calculated according to the Reed Muench formula .
Cross-reactivity among viruses and recombinant proteins
Serological cross-reactivity among different human coronaviruses was tested by incubation of SARSCoV-infected cells with mouse antisera against the two other human coronaviruses, HCoV 229E and HCoV OC43, and subsequent indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). To evaluate cross-reactivity among different recombinant proteins of the three human coronaviruses, the proteins were subjected to immunoblot assays with mouse antisera against the proteins as well as antisera against the viruses and were also subjected to ELISA with 460 serum samples from SARS convalescents as well as mice antisera against the viruses.
Immune responses to the truncated SARSCoV S-N fusion protein
Humoral immune response
Serum samples were collected from the tail veins every 3 days after the initial immunization and the final serum samples were collected from the orbital plexus for antibody level assessment by the SARSCoV lysate ELISA IgG Kit according to the manufacturer's instruction, except that peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG was substituted by peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sihuan Sci-Technics Company, Beijing). A value of S/N ≥ 2.1 was taken as positive standard.
Spleen lymphocyte immune response
The proliferation of spleen lymphocytes was measured by colorimetric analysis described previously . Four BALB/c mice in each group were killed on day 33 after immunization and their spleens were ground into single-cell suspensions in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. The suspensions were mixed with 5 volumes of erythrocyte lysis buffer (0.01 M Tris-HCl pH 7.6; 0.01 M NaCl; 0.005 M MgCl2), incubated for 10 minutes on ice and centrifuged at 400 g for 5 min at 4°C. The pellets were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. They were seeded in triplicates in flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates (Costar) with 5 × 105 cells per well in 100 μL of culture medium with purified and truncated S-N protein at 10, 3, 1, 0.3 and 0 μg/mL, respectively. After incubation for 3 days with 5% CO2 at 37°C, 10 μL of a solution of the tetrazolium salt 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was added to each well, and the plates were incubated for 4 h at 37°C. One hundred microliter of lysis buffer containing 10% Triton-50% isopropanol-0.01 M hydrochloric acid was then added to each well, and the plates were incubated overnight. The optical densities at 570 nm (OD570) and at 630 nm (OD630) were measured.
SARSCoV challenge and determination of virus load
Four BALB/c mice from each group, immunized as well as controls, were challenged intranasally with 104 TCID50 of the SARSCoV GD01 strain on day 33 after immunization to tested the heterologous protection. After two days of clinical observation the mice were sacrificed and their lungs were collected for determination of the level of viral RNA.
Fifty mg lung tissue was first homogenized in liquid nitrogen and then in 1 mL of TRIzol. Tissue homogenates were clarified by low-speed centrifugation (3000 rpm). RNA extraction was performed according to manual (Invitrogen). Virus loads were determined by fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR and expressed as number of copies per gram tissue .
Serological cross-reactivity among coronaviruses and recombinant proteins
Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ELISA with truncated S-N fusion protein as antigen
Antibody detection rates for recombinant protein ELISA and SARSCoV lysate ELISA of sera from SARS patients and healthy controls.
Sera of SARS patients
Sera of healthy blood donors
truncated S protein
truncated N protein
truncated S-N protein
Specific humoral and cellular anti- SARSCoV immune responses to the truncated S-N fusion protein
Sera antibody tests showed the ability of the fusion protein to induce the generation of SARS-specific antibodies in the immunized mice. Nine to twelve days after injection, the specific Ig G antibody could be detected. To test whether the mouse sera against the truncated S-N protein were able to neutralize SARSCoV, a property that is likely to be crucial in the defense against virus infection, the SARSCoV BJ01 strain was used in a microneutralization assay as described in Materials and Methods. The serum titer of neutralizing antibodies against SARSCoV was 2.425 ± 0.209 (Lg dilution ± SD)
Effects of recombinant protein on spleen cell proliferation in mice injected with recombinant proteins and a control group of mice injected with PBS by MTTa
Proliferation (D valueb ± SD) with the following concentration (μg/ml) of recombinant proteins
0.116 ± 0.112
0.074 ± 0.046
0.011 ± 0.002
0.022 ± 0.008
0.043 ± 0.008
0.603 ± 0.118
0.551 ± 0.019
0.542 ± 0.216
0.476 ± 0.274
0.068 ± 0.021
Protection from SARSCoV challenge and virus replication
No clinical signs of illness were observed in either group of SARS-challenged mice. The analysis for SARSCoV genome copies in the lungs of immunized mice and controls was performed. The mean of virus genome copy numbers are 20708 ± 6202 (copies/g ± SD) per 1 gram lung tissue in the control group, whereas virus loads in mice immunized with truncated S-N protein were below the limit of detection.
SARS, a newly emerged infectious disease which caused worldwide outbreak in 2003, has been a crucial public health problem. Establishing specific and convenient laboratory tests for SARS and finding a vaccine for this virus are of high priority.
Using the purified proteins as antigens in ELISA assays for antibodies in the sera of SARS patients we found that the assay using truncated S-N fusion protein has a clearly higher sensitivity than those using intact N protein or truncated S and N proteins, and virtually as high as the assay using whole SARSCoV lysate (Table 2). The results indicated the N and S protein were complementary in detecting SARS-specific antibodies. This is consistent with previous studies [28, 29]. Five positive sera to SARSCoV lysate antigen were all tested positive against SARSCoV N protein but negative against SARSCoV truncated N-S protein. These sera were also tested positive against N proteins of HCoV 229E and HCoV OC43 (data not shown), which could be reasonably explained partly by existence of other HCoV infections in these humans. The truncated S-N fusion protein was also subjected to ELISA with mice antisera against SARSCoV (BJ01), HCoV 229E and HCoV OC43. Only mice antiserum against SARSCoV(BJ01) tests positive. These results showed that the SARSCoV truncated N-S protein had high specificity. Considering the difficulty of SARSCoV lysate antigen production and its false positive ratio (~0.77%, Table 2), the truncated S-N fusion protein is a suitable diagnostic antigen for detection of SARSCoV antibodies.
The S protein of SARSCoV is an important determinant of tissue tropism, as it mediates virus and cellular membrane fusion. Analysis of neutralizing epitopes showed that the receptor-binding region of the S protein plays an important role in virus infection [12, 30, 31]. A DNA vaccine study of SARSCoV has also shown that the S protein can induce protective immune responses to SARSCoV . Moreover, some data showed that the N protein of SARSCoV could induce specific T-cell responses and studies of animal coronaviruses have suggested that both cellular and humoral immunity contribute to protection during persistent infection [13, 16, 33]. Considering that our fusion protein includes the receptor-binding region of the S protein and immunodominant T-cell epitopes of the N protein, we also investigated the role of the truncated S-N protein in anti-SARSCoV infection. Seven to nine days after injection of the fusion protein, the mice began to show seropositive for SARS antibodies. After the first booster, all mice generated high titer of SARS-specific antibodies and the antibodies could neutralize the SARSCoV infectivity. In the lymphocytes proliferation assay, the truncated S-N protein could induce T cell proliferation (Table 3). Compared to the control group, the mice immunized with the truncated S-N protein were protected from SARSCoV challenge, as indicated by a lack of detectable viral RNA. Therefore, in addition to being a valuable diagnostic antigen the truncated S-N fusion protein is a potential candidate for the development of a SARS subunit vaccine.
The truncated S-N fusion protein has high sensitivity and specificity and it is a suitable diagnostic antigen for detection of SARSCoV antibodies. On the other hand, it could induce the mice generated high titer of SARS-specific neutralizing antibodies and T cell proliferation. The mice immunized with the truncated S-N protein were protected from SARSCoV challenge. It is also a potential candidate for the development of a SARS subunit vaccine.
We thank Drs. Xiuqing Zhang critical reading of the manuscript. We thank research funding from the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) 2003AA208216 from Ministry of Science and Technology, the People's Republic of China and from Chinese Academy of Sciences.
- WHO: Cumulative number of reported cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). 2003, [http://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/2003_08_15/en/]Google Scholar
- WHO: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2003, 78: 86-Google Scholar
- Marra MA, Jones SJM, Astell CR, Holt RA, Wilson AB, Butterfield YSN, Khattra J, Jennifer KA, Barber SA, Chan SY, Cloutier A, Coughlin SM, Freeman D, Girn N, Griffith OL, Leach SR, Mayo M, McDonald H, Montgomery SB, Pandoh PK, Petrescu AS, Robertson AG, Schein JE, Siddiqui A, Smailus DE, Stott JM, Yang GS: The Genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science. 2003, 300: 1399-1404. 10.1126/science.1085953.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peiris JS, Lai ST, Poon LL, Guan Y, Yam LY, Lim W, Nicholls J, Yee WK, Yan WW, Cheung MT, Cheng VC, Chan KH, Tsang DN, Yung RW, Ng TK, Yuen KY, SARS study group: Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003, 361: 1319-1325. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13077-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qin E, Zhu Q, Yu M, Fan B, Chang G, Si B, Yang B, Peng W, Jiang T, Liu B, Deng Y, Liu H, Zhang Y, Wang C, Li Y, Gan Y, Li X, Lü F, Tan G, Cao W, Yang R, Wang J, Li W, Xu Z, Li Y, Wu Q, Lin W, Han Y, Li G, Li W, et al.: A complete sequence and comparative analysis of a SARS-associated virus (Isolate BJ01). Chin Sci Bulltin. 2003, 48: 941-948. 10.1360/03wc0186.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rota PA, Oberste MS, Monroe SS, Nix WA, Campagnoli R, Icenogle JP, Peñaranda S, Bankamp B, Maher K, Chen MH, Tong S, Tamin A, Lowe L, Frace M, DeRisi JL, Chen Q, Wang D, Erdman DD, Peret TC, Burns C, Ksiazek TG, Rollin PE, Sanchez A, Liffick S, Holloway B, Limor J, McCaustland K, Olsen-Rasmussen M, Fouchier R, Günther S, et al.: Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science. 2003, 300: 1394-1399. 10.1126/science.1085952.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen W, Xu Z, Mu J, Yang L, Gan H, Mu F, Fan B, He B, Huang S, You B, Yang Y, Tang X, Qiu L, Qiu Y, Wen J, Fang J, Wang J: Antibody response and viraemia during the course of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus infection. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2004, 53: 435-438. 10.1099/jmm.0.45561-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Wen J, Li J, Yin J, Zhu Q, Wang H, Yang Y, Qin E, You B, Li W, Li X, Huang S, Yang R, Zhang X, Yang L, Zhang T, Yin Y, Cui X, Tang X, Wang L, He B, Ma L, Lei T, Zeng C, Fang J, Yu J, Wang J, Yang H, West MB, Bhatnagar A, et al.: Assessment of Immunoreactive Synthetic Peptides from the Structural Proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. Clinical Chemistry. 2003, 49 (12): 1989-1996. 10.1373/clinchem.2003.023184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woo PC, Lau SK, Wong BH, Tsoi HW, Fung AM, Chan KH, Tam VK, Peiris JS, Yuen KY: Detection of specific antibodies to SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid protein for serodiagnosis of SARS coronavirus pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 2306-2309. 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2306-2309.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu F, Le MQ, Inoue S, Thai HT, Hasebe F, Del Carmen Parquet M, Morita K: Evaluation of inapparent nosocomial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in Vietnam by use of highly specific recombinant truncated nucleocapsid protein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005, 12 (7): 848-54. 10.1128/CDLI.12.7.848-854.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lei Shi, Qipeng Zhang, Wei Rui, Ming Lu: Structure and function Analysis of SARS-CoV spike protein. [http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/cmbidata/sars/sars_secstructure/spike.htm]
- Tripp RA, Haynes LM, Moore D, Anderson B, Tamin A, Harcourt BH, Jones LP, Yilla M, Babcock GJ, Greenough T, Ambrosino DM, Alvarez R, Callaway J, Cavitt S, Kamrud K, Alterson H, Smith J, Harcourt JL, Miao C, Razdan R, Comer JA, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, Sanchez A, Rota PA, Bellini WJ, Anderson LJ: Monoclonal antibodies to SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV): Identification of neutralizing and antibodies reactive to S, N, M and E viral proteins. J Virol Methods. 2005, 128 (1–2): 21-28. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.03.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu SJ, Leng CH, Lien SP, Chi HY, Huang CY, Lin CL, Lian WC, Chen CJ, Hsieh SL, Chong P: Immunological characterizations of the nucleocapsid protein based SARS vaccine candidates. Vaccine. 2006, 24: 3100-3108. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.01.058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peng H, Yang LT, Wang LY, Li J, Huang J, Lu ZQ, Koup RA, Bailer RT, Wu CY: Long-lived memory T lymphocyte responses against SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid protein in SARS-recovered patients. Virology. 2006, 351: 466-475. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.03.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhi Y, Kobinger GP, Jordan H, Suchma K, Weiss SR, Shen H, Schumer G, Gao G, Boyer JL, Crystal RG, Wilson JM: Identification of murine CD8 T cell epitopes in codon-optimized SARS-associated coronavirus spike protein. Virology. 2005, 335: 34-45. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.01.050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sestak K, Meister RK, Hayes JR, Kim L, Lewis PA, Myers G, Saif LG: Active immunity and T-cell populations in pigs intraperitoneally inoculated with baculovirus-expressed transmissible gastroenteritis virus structural proteins. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1999, 70: 203-221. 10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00074-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen WJ, Niu DS, Zhang XY, Chen ML, Cui H, Wei WJ, Wen BH, Chen XR: Recombinant 56-Kilodalton Major Outer Membrane Protein Antigen of Orientia tsutsugamushi Shanxi and Its Antigenicity. Infection and Immunity. 2003, 8: 4772-4779. 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4772-4779.2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J: Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979, 76: 4350-4354. 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jin DY, Li MF: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 1992, Press of science, Beijing, 2Google Scholar
- Du P: Medical experimental virology. 1982, Shanghai Association of Microbiology, Shanghai, China, 211-212.Google Scholar
- Andreoni M, Faircloth M, Vugler L, Britt WJ: A rapid microneutralization assay for the measurement of neutralizing antibody reactive with human cytomegalovirus. J Virol Methods. 1989, 23: 157-167. 10.1016/0166-0934(89)90129-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reed LJ, Muench H: A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Hyg. 1938, 27: 493-497.Google Scholar
- Shuhan Sun: Nuclear vaccine. 2000, Shanghai: Press of the Second Military Medicine University, 114-Google Scholar
- Chen WJ, Xu ZY, Mu JS, He B, Yang L, Lin L, Meng SF, Mu F, Gan HX, Huang SY, Wen J, Fang JQ, Wang J: Real-Time Quantitative Fluorescent Reverse Transcriptase-PCR for Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Associated Coronavirus RNA. Molecular Diagnosis. 2004, 8 (4): 231-235. 10.2165/00066982-200408040-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun ZF, Meng XJ: Antigenic Cross-Reactivity between the Nucleocapsid Protein of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and Polyclonal Antisera of Antigenic Group I Animal Coronaviruses: Implication for SARS Diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2004, 42 (5): 2351-2352. 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2351-2352.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS, Zaki SR, Peret T, Emery S, Tong S, Urbani C, Comer JA, Lim W, Rollin PE, Dowell SF, Ling AE, Humphrey CD, Shieh WJ, Guarner J, Paddock CD, Rota P, Fields B, DeRisi J, Yang JY, Cox N, Hughes JM, LeDuc JW, Bellini WJ, Anderson LJ, SARS Working Group: A Novel Coronavirus Associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2003, 348 (20): 1953-1966. 10.1056/NEJMoa030781.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- He Q, Chong KH, Chng HH, Leung B, Ling AE, Wei T, Chan SW, Ooi EE, Kwang J: Development of a Western blot assay for detection of antibodies against coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004, 11: 417-422. 10.1128/CDLI.11.2.417-422.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woo PC, Lau SK, Wong BH, Tsoi HW, Fung AM, Kao RY, Chan KH, Peiris JS, Yuen KY: Differential Sensitivities of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus Spike Polypeptide Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and SARS Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Protein ELISA for Serodiagnosis of SARS Coronavirus Pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43 (7): 3054-3058. 10.1128/JCM.43.7.3054-3058.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu HS, Hsieh YC, Su IJ, Lin TH, Chiu SC, Hsu YF, Lin JH, Wang MC, Chen JY, Hsiao PW, Chang GD, Wang AH, Ting HW, Chou CM, Huang CJ: Early detection of antibodies against various structural proteins of the SARS-associated coronavirus in SARS patients. J Biomed Sci. 2004, 11 (1): 117-126. 10.1007/BF02256554.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gallagher TM, Buchmeier MJ: Coronavirus spike proteins in viral entry and pathogenesis. Virology. 2001, 279 (2): 371-374. 10.1006/viro.2000.0757.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hideyuki Kubo, Yasuko K: Yamada and Fumihiro Taguchi. Localization of Neutralizing Epitopes and the Receptor-Binding Site within the Amino-Terminal 330 Amino Acids of the Murine Coronavirus Spike Protein. Journal of Virology. 1994, 68 (9): 5403-5410.Google Scholar
- Yang ZY, Kong WP, Huang Y, Roberts A, Murphy BR, Subbarao K, Nabel GJ: A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice. Nature. 2004, 428: 561-564. 10.1038/nature02463.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park S, Sestak K, Hodgins DC, Shoup DI, Ward LA, Jackwood DJ, Saif LJ: Immune response of sows vaccinated with attenuated transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) and recombinant TGEV spike protein vaccines and protection of their suckling pigs against virulent TGEV challenge exposure. Am J Vet Res. 1998, 59 (8): 1002-1008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.