Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Antimicrobial peptides effectively kill a broad spectrum of Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus strains independently of origin, sub-type, or virulence factor expression

BMC Microbiology volume 8, Article number: 205 (2008) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Host defense peptides (HDPs), or antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), are important components of the innate immune system that bacterial pathogens must overcome to establish an infection and HDPs have been suggested as novel antimicrobial therapeutics in treatment of infectious diseases. Hence it is important to determine the natural variation in susceptibility to HDPs to ensure a successful use in clinical treatment regimes.

Results

Strains of two human bacterial pathogens, Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus, were selected to cover a wide range of origin, sub-type, and phenotypic behavior. Strains within each species were equally sensitive to HDPs and oxidative stress representing important components of the innate immune defense system. Four non-human peptides (protamine, plectasin, novicidin, and novispirin G10) were similar in activity profile (MIC value spectrum) to the human β-defensin 3 (HBD-3). All strains were inhibited by concentrations of hydrogen peroxide between 0.1% – 1.0%. Sub-selections of both species differed in expression of several virulence-related factors and in their ability to survive in human whole blood and kill the nematode virulence model Caenorhabditis elegans. For L. monocytogenes, proliferation in whole blood was paralleled by high invasion in Caco-2 cells and fast killing of C. elegans, however, no such pattern in phenotypic behavior was observed for S. aureus and none of the phenotypic differences were correlated to sensitivity to HDPs.

Conclusion

Strains of L. monocytogenes and S. aureus were within each species equally sensitive to a range of HDPs despite variations in subtype, origin, and phenotypic behavior. Our results suggest that therapeutic use of HDPs will not be hampered by occurrence of naturally tolerant strains of the two species investigated in the present study.

Background

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are widespread as bacterial inactivator molecules in the innate immune systems of insects, fungi, plants, and mammals. The peptides are also known as host defense peptides (HDPs) as they have other, immuno-modulatory functions besides the direct antimicrobial actions. Three broad categories of HDPs have been identified: the linear peptides with helical structures (e.g. LL-37), the cysteine stabilized peptides with beta-sheet (e.g. the defensins), and a group of linear peptides rich in proline and arginine that primarily have been identified in non-mammalian species [1–3].

The HDPs target a broad spectrum of bacteria [3] and recently, these peptides have been suggested as novel antimicrobials for treating bacterial infections [4, 5]. Whilst the peptides are regarded as universal antibacterial compounds, little is known about the sensitivity spectrum of different strains of pathogenic bacteria. Such understanding would be an essential part of evaluating the potential of HDPs in treatment.

Whilst some known pathogens possess intrinsic resistance mechanisms indicating a central role for HDP resistance in pathogenicity it is generally assumed that acquisition of resistance towards a given HDP is relatively improbable [6]. However, the spectrum of sensitivity, e.g. measured as MIC may vary in a selection of strains that may differ in genes known to be involved in resistance such as the dlt operon or mprF in S. aureus [7, 8]. Also, HDPs and other components of the innate defense system may be viewed as stress factors against which bacteria have developed many counter protective mechanisms.

The ability of pathogenic bacteria to overcome these defense systems is essential to establish an infection. Strains of a particular pathogenic organism are not equally virulent [9–12] and may also differ in sensitivity to stresses encountered [9, 13, 14]. However, the resistance of different strains to the stresses imposed by the host defense systems might also differ and be indicative of differences in virulence.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the natural variation in sensitivity of strains of two pathogenic species to host defense peptides and hydrogen peroxide. In addition, if any differences were found, to determine if this could be reflected by variation in the strains' phenotypic behavior, including expression of virulence-related factors. Four model-peptides were chosen to represent each of the three different peptide categories: protamine is a linear arginine-rich peptide originally isolated from salmon spermatozoa [15], the fungal defensin plectasin [5], and two cathelicidins, novispirin G10 [16] and its derivate novicidin. We used a collection of the two Gram-positive organisms, Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus, and selected strains carefully to reflect different important niches of the bacteria. L. monocytogenes is a foodborne pathogen infecting via the gastrointestinal epithelia [17] and S. aureus is community- or hospital acquired and gains access to the tissues and blood stream whenever the skin or mucosal barrier is damaged [18]. To ensure that the strain collection reflected a broad variation in phenotypic behavior, we also determined the expression of several virulence factors and behavior of the bacteria in simple eukaryotic models. We found that the L. monocytogenes and S. aureus strains were within each species equally sensitive to single components of the innate immune defense system and this was not paralleled by their differences in phenotypic behavior.

Methods

Strains and culture conditions

Experiments were carried out with a collection of 25 Listeria monocytogenes strains (Table 1) and 16 Staphylococcus aureus strains (Table 2) representing different lineages and serotypes (L. monocytogenes), spa types (S. aureus), and origins (food processing environment, food products, and human clinical isolates). Six L. monocytogenes strains were mutants of the EGD strain and were mutated in genes known to be involved in stress tolerance. The S. aureus collection comprised two deletion mutants, strains Sa113/ΔmprF [8] and Sa113/ΔdltA [7], known to be more sensitive to host defense peptides. Two of the S. aureus strains could not immediately be assigned to an existing spa type and we are in the process of acquiring the additional information that is needed to assign a new spa type to them. The strains were obtained from The National Institute of Aquatic Resources and The National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Statens Serum Institut, Denmark, University of Würzburg, Germany and Campden Food and Drink Association, United Kingdom. Stock cultures were stored at -80°C in 4% (w/V) glycerol, 0.5% (w/V) glucose, and 2.0% (w/V) skimmed milk powder. The bacteria were grown in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth (Oxoid, CM0225), Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB) (Oxoid, CM129), and cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton II Broth (MHB) (Becton Dickinson, 212322) adjusted to pH 7.4. To avoid unspecific binding of host defense peptides to plastic ware and agar, all MIC determinations were carried out using polypropylene plastic ware and radial diffusion assays were carried out in MHB supplemented with 1% agarose (Invitrogen, 15510-027) as gelling agent.

Table 1 Origin, serotype, lineage, and MIC values of the Listeria monocytogenes strains used in the present study
Full size table
Table 2 Origin, spa type, and MIC values of Staphylococcus aureus strains used in the present study
Full size table

Host defense peptides and oxidative compounds

Protamine was purchased from Sigma (P4020-5G). Plectasin, novicidin, and novispirin G10 were supplied by Novozymes A/S. Recombinant HBD-3 was purchased from PeproTech (300-52). The host defense peptides were dissolved in 0.01% acetic acid/0.1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, A7906). Hydrogen peroxide was purchased from Bie & Berntsen (MER 1.07209.1000).

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of host defense peptides in liquid medium

The strain collection was tested for sensitivity to protamine, plectasin, novicidin, and novispirin G10 by determining their minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) using a microbroth dilution method [19]. Colonies from a BHI agar plate incubated overnight were suspended in MHB pH 7.4 to a turbidity of 0.11–0.12 at 546 nm (approx. 1.0 × 108 CFU/ml) and diluted in MHB to a concentration of 5.0 × 105 CFU/ml. 90 μl of bacterial suspension was incubated with 10 μl of peptide solution in polypropylene 96-well plates (Nunc, 442587) for 18–24 h at 37°C. The peptide solutions were made fresh on the day of assay and diluted two-fold. The range of concentrations assayed were 0.031–32 μg/ml for novicidin, 0.125–128 μg/ml for protamine and novispirin G10, and 0.25–256 μg/ml for plectasin. MIC was the lowest peptide concentration at which visual growth was inhibited. The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values were determined by plating l0 μl samples from wells with no visible growth onto BHI agar plates. MBC was the lowest concentration of each peptide of which 99.9% reduction of the initial inoculum was observed.

Determination of Minimal Effective Concentration (MEC) of host defense peptides and H2O2 in radial diffusion assay

The MEC of HBD-3 was assayed on a sub-selection of strains using a radial diffusion assay [20] with some modifications. In brief, MHB/1% agarose was supplemented with glucose to an end-concentration of 0.1% (w/V) to enhance the growth of L. monocytogenes and improve the visualization of the inhibition zones. Bacterial suspensions were prepared as described for MIC determination in liquid medium, mixed with melted MHB pH 7.4/1% agarose/0.1% glucose medium at 42°C to 5.0 × 106 CFU/ml, and 10 ml gel was poured into 90 mm Petri dishes. Following solidification on a leveling table, 1 mm wells were punched with a Pasteur pipette. Two-fold dilutions of HBD-3 were prepared in 0.01% acetic acid/0.1% bovine serum albumin to a concentration range of 0.25–256 μg/ml and 2 μl was added to each well. The plates were incubated overnight at 37°C and MEC was determined as the lowest peptide concentration at which an inhibition zone was observed. Each strain was tested in two independent trials.

A similar assay was performed to determine the MEC of hydrogen peroxide. The bacteria were prepared and mixed with MHB/1% agarose as described above and 50 ml gel was poured into 140 mm Petri dishes. The gel was allowed to solidify and 3 mm wells were punched. Hydrogen peroxide was serially diluted from stock (30%) in Millipore water and 10 μl was transferred to each well. The plates were incubated overnight at 37°C and the MEC was read as described above.

Extracellular virulence factors of S. aureus

S. aureus strains were examined for production of several virulence factors to determine their variation in phenotypic behavior. It was verified that all strains were S. aureus by analyzing their production of protein A and clumping factor A using the BactiStaph identification kit (Oxoid, R21144) as described by the manufacturer. The hemolytic activity of S. aureus strains was determined in a microplate hemolysin assay [21, 22]. All strains were grown overnight in BHI at 37°C with shaking and samples of the cultures were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was treated with 10 mM dithiotreitol and 50 μl two-fold dilutions were made in BHI in a microtiter plate with U-formed wells. Bovine erythrocytes were washed in 0.9% saline with 0.1% gelatin and 0.0043% sodium azide and 100 μl of a 0.5% suspension was added to the supernatant. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 30–45 min and the hemolytic activity was scored as follows: +++, strong hemolysis; ++, moderate hemolysis; +, weak hemolysis; (+), questionable hemolysis; -, no hemolysis. The assay was carried out in duplicate. Staphylokinase activity was examined as described earlier [23]. Plates containing fibrinogen were prepared by dissolving human fibrinogen (Kordia, FIB 3) in double strength TSB to a final concentration of 0.1% (w/V). To this was added 3% (w/V) agar at 55°C and incubated at this temperature for 10 min. Fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, 10106-151) was added at 0.1% (V/V). Plates without added serum served as controls for non-specific effects such as might be due to high levels of protease. Isolated colonies of each strain were then streaked onto the plates and incubated overnight at 37°C. A clear zone surrounding the bacterial growth indicated staphylokinase activity. The assay was repeated in two independent trials. Catalase activity was determined using the capillary tube catalase test as described earlier [24]. Briefly, 3% (V/V) H2O2 were drawn into capillary tubes (1 mm in diameter), a bacterial colony was touched with the H2O2 tube, and the amount of gas production was scored semiquantitatively after 10 seconds. +(+), ++, ++(+), and +++ represent a few bubbles, moderate number of bubbles, many bubbles, and gas forcing the 3% H2O2 upwards in the capillary tube, respectively. Ten isolated colonies were tested for each strain in two independent trials. Carotenoid production was assessed by smearing isolated colonies on white filter paper. Finally the strains were analyzed for production of enterotoxins A, B, C, and D, and toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST-1) using reversed passive latex agglutination kits (Oxoid, TD0900 and TD0940) as described by the manufacturer.

S. aureus induced killing of C. elegans

For a sub-collection of S. aureus strains, the virulence was assessed in C. elegans as described [25]. 20 μl overnight culture of each strain was spread onto Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) plates and incubated at 37°C over night. For each strain, about 100 L4 hermaphrodites of the pha-1 (e2123ts) mutant [26] were transferred from NGM plates seeded with E. coli OP50 to the plates seeded with staphylococci and incubated at 25°C. The plates were scored for live and dead worms every 24 hours and 50% mortality was taken as the time when 50% of the initial number of worms were dead. At least three independent trials were performed for each strain.

L. monocytogenes invasion into Caco-2 cells and induced killing of C. elegans

The data included are based on work presented in [27, 28]. In brief, Caco-2 cells (ATCC HTB 37) for the invasion assay were grown to monolayers in 96-well tissue culture plates. Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes were adjusted to approximately 1.5 × 107 CFU/ml and allowed to infect the Caco-2 cells for 1 hour at 37°C. Extracellular bacteria were killed by incubation with 50 μg/ml gentamicin for 1 hour at 37°C before the cells were lyzed using 0.1% Triton X-100. The number of intracellular bacteria was determined by plate count. The C. elegans assay was performed as described above for S. aureus except that the bacteria were spread onto Luria-Bertani (LB) plates.

Human whole blood killing assay

A sub-selection of strains was tested for sensitivity to human whole blood by incubating the individual L. monocytogenes and S. aureus strains with blood to a final concentration of 75%. Human blood samples were obtained from a normal healthy volunteer by venous puncture and collected in BD vacutainers coated with 3.8% citrate (Hettich Labinstruments Aps, 455382). Bacterial suspensions were prepared as described for MIC determination and diluted in MHB to a final concentration of approximately 5.0 × 103 CFU/ml, followed by addition of fresh human blood or peptone saline (0.1% peptone, 0.85% NaCl) as a control. E. coli MG1655 was used as a positive control for neutrophil-mediated killing. The mixtures were shaken (300 rpm) at 37°C for 24 hours. To determine bacterial viability, aliquots were withdrawn at the beginning of the assay and after 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours of incubation and serial dilutions were plated onto BHI agar. Each strain was tested in duplicate in two independent trials.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism Statistical software. Data did not follow a Gaussian distribution and so Friedman's test was used to compare strains and Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare groups. Dunn's post test was used for both. If only two groups were compared, the Mann-Whitney test was used. Since MIC and MEC values were determined from two-fold dilutions of peptides, these data were log2-transformed before test.

Results

MIC and MBC of HDP in liquid medium against L. monocytogenes and S. aureus

We compared the sensitivity of 25 L. monocytogenes strains and 16 S. aureus strains to four model HDPs (Table 1 and Table 2). The MIC values of the four HDPs against L. monocytogenes were 8–32 μg/ml (protamine), 32–128 μg/ml (plectasin), 2–8 μg/ml (novicidin), and 4–128 μg/ml (novispirin G10). For S. aureus the range was 8–32 μg/ml (protamine), 1–32 μg/ml (plectasin), 0.5–12 μg/ml (novicidin), and 2->128 μg/ml (novispirin G10). Protamine appeared to be equally efficient against both L. monocytogenes and S. aureus, while plectasin was more active against S. aureus than L. monocytogenes. Both novicidin and novispirin G10 were equally effective against the two bacteria and novicidin was clearly more potent than its parent peptide. The minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of plectasin, novicidin, and novispirin G10 were identical to the MICs, suggesting that all three peptides have pronounced bactericidal effects.

The two peptide-sensitive S. aureus mutants (SA113/ΔmprF and SA113/ΔdltA) were, logically, more sensitive than the rest of the strains but otherwise there was no significant differences in peptide sensitivity between neither L. monocytogenes (p = 0.0718) nor S. aureus (p = 0.0647). Some differences were found between L. monocytogenes lineages in tolerance to single peptides (lineage 1 strains were more sensitive to plectasin, p = 0.01, and lineage 2 strains were more sensitive to novicidin, p = 0.0334), but there was no difference in tolerance between lineages to all the four peptides together (p = 0.4627). Likewise, no significant differences were found when the strains were grouped according to origin (clinical, food, and processing), suggesting that there is no systematic differences in peptide tolerance between the strains.

No systematic differences in MEC values of human β-defensin 3 between strains

A sub-selection of strains was tested against the human host defense peptide β-defensin 3 (HBD-3) to compare the activity spectrum to the four model-peptides. HBD-3 was originally identified in skin and is also expressed in epithelial cells lining the digestive tract and is active towards Gram-positive bacteria [29]. It is therefore highly relevant when examining both L. monocytogenes and S. aureus. The MEC values varied between 6 and 24 μg/ml for L. monocytogenes and 32 and 64 μg/ml for S. aureus (Tables 1 and 2). As for the non-human model-peptides, there was no systematic variation in MEC values when the strains were grouped according to origin for neither L. monocytogenes (p = 0.2276) nor S. aureus (p = 0.2899). The MEC spectrum of HBD-3 was similar to the four non-human peptides.

MEC of hydrogen peroxide against L. monocytogenes and S. aureus in radial diffusion assay

The susceptibility of the strains to an oxidative burst generated by hydrogen peroxide was assayed by a radial diffusion assay (Tables 1 and 2). MEC values were in the range of 0.12–0.94% (V/V) against L. monocytogenes and 0.12–0.47% (V/V) against S. aureus. As was the case with the HDPs no systematic difference in tolerance between strains could be observed when grouped according to origin for neither L. monocytogenes (p = 0.0571) nor S. aureus (p = 0.5225). Also, there was no difference in tolerance between L. monocytogenes lineage 1 and 2 strains (p = 0.1491).

Determination of virulence factor expression and phenotypic behavior in L. monocytogenes and S. aureus strains

To address if differences in peptide sensitivity among strains reflect their virulence potential, it is necessary to have a collection of strains that represent a wide spectrum of virulence factor expression. We have previously shown that the L. monocytogenes strains used in the present study differ in behavior in several virulence factor assays. The strains varied in their ability to invade Caco-2 cells and in their killing kinetics against C. elegans [27, 28]. A sub-collection of strains (Table 3) was selected for the present study to span the different behavior in the virulence models.

Table 3 Virulence assessment and survival in whole blood of a sub-collection of L. monocytogenes strains
Full size table

To select a similar representative sub-collection of S. aureus strains, each strain was analyzed for several extracellular virulence factors (Table 4).

Table 4 Virulence assessment of the S. aureus strain collection
Full size table

The two HDP-sensitive mutants had significantly lower virulence factor expression than the rest (p = 0.0299), which could indicate that intrinsic HDP tolerance may be related to virulence of pathogenic bacteria. The rest of the strains varied in the expression of the individual virulence factors but no clear patterns in phenotypic behavior were found.

For instance, the clinical strains were not more hemolytic than the rest of the strains (p = 0.4676) consistent with reports on clinical strains without hemolytic activity [30, 31]. In this study an animal clinical strain, 2148-jvi, was found to be non-hemolytic and two human clinical strains, KES 439 and KES 735, were only weakly hemolytic. Likewise, there was no correlation between the production of catalase and carotenoid (r = 0.444, p = 0.085), suggesting that these oxidative attack defense mechanisms contribute differently in each strain.

Three strains produced enterotoxins and only one of these, strain 14943, produced both enterotoxin A and TSST-1.

Seven strains were selected to represent different expression levels of the virulence factors and different strain origin. These were analyzed for their killing kinetics in a C. elegans worm model. The seven S. aureus strains killed the C. elegans more rapidly than the negative control strain E. coli OP50 (Figure 1 and Table 4). The strains differed with respect to the time taken to reach 50% mortality of the worms. When feeding on the two fastest killers, the human clinical strains KES 626 and B31369, the worms reached 50% mortality in 118 and 140 hours respectively. The three food isolates 14943, 796, and K3-B2 resulted in 50% mortality after 157 hours, 223 hours, and 225 hours respectively. Feeding on the laboratory reference strain 8325-4 took 184 hours to reach 50% mortality, while the mastitis isolate 2148-jvi led to 50% mortality in 256 hours.

Figure 1
figure 1

Assessment of virulence of a sub-selection of S. aureus strains against C. elegans. 100 pha-1 mutant worms were tested for each strain. % mortality indicates the number of dead worms relative to the starting number of worms. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measures.

Full size image

Difference in ability to survive and grow in whole blood

A sub-collection of strains was examined for their behavior in human whole blood to analyze the response of these strains to a more complex model of the innate immune system. The strains were chosen on the basis of their origin and their behavior in the virulence factor assays described above (Table 3 and Table 4).

All seven L. monocytogenes strains were able to survive in human whole blood for 24 hours (Figure 2A). Strains EGD and Scott A remained at approximately the same cell number during the 24 hours of incubation, whereas the strains N53-1 and La111 grew during the first four hours of incubation and thereafter declined to the inoculation level or just below. The last three strains grew throughout the experiment. La22 increased approximately half a log unit and both 7418 and 4446 grew to approximately one log unit over inoculation level. The ability to grow and/or survive in whole blood was to some extent paralleled by the ability of the strains to invade Caco-2 cells and kill C. elegans worms. Thus, the better the survival or growth, the higher the invasion into Caco-2 cells and mortality in C. elegans. 7418 and 4446 both grew well in whole blood, were highly invasive in Caco-2 cells, and killed 50% of the C. elegans worms in 80 hours. Likewise, N53-1 and La111 whose cell numbers were declining in whole blood both were low invasive in Caco-2 cells and took 110 hours to kill 50% of the worms. For La22, EGD, and Scott A there was not a clear pattern. There was a correlation between the invasive ability in Caco-2 and the lethality in C. elegans (r = -0.891, p = 0.033) but the survival in whole blood could not be correlated to neither Caco-2 invasion (r = 0.327, p = 0.498) nor C. elegans (r = -0.495, p = 0.356).

Figure 2
figure 2

Survival of selected L. monocytogenes (A) and S. aureus (B) strains in human whole blood. Strains were adjusted to 1.0 × 103 CFU/ml, mixed 1:3 with human whole blood, and incubated at 37°C. E. coli MG1655 was used as a positive control for neutrophil killing. Bars represent standard deviations of duplicate observations. Graphs are representative of two independent experiments. Arrows indicate that cell numbers were below the detection limit (1.0 × 101 CFU/ml).

Full size image

All seven S. aureus strains both survived and grew in whole blood (Figure 2B). Six of the strains had nearly identical growth patterns. KES 626 was the strain that reached the highest cell density (1.0 × 109 CFU/ml) after 24 hours. This was also the strain that killed the C. elegans worms the fastest. 2148-jvi grew remarkably poorer than the rest and reached a cell density of only 3.0 × 106 CFU/ml after 24 hours. When C. elegans fed on 2148-jvi, 50% mortality was not reached until after 256 hours compared to 118 hours for KES 626. There was however, no statistical correlation between killing time in C. elegans and survival in whole blood for the seven strains (r = -0.750, p = 0.066). Together, the C. elegans and whole blood assays do not identify more virulent strains but they do indicate that the strains differ in phenotypic behavior.

Discussion

In the present study, we found that antimicrobial components of the innate immune defense (HDPs and hydrogen peroxide) act equally well on several strains of two pathogenic bacterial species (Table 1 and 2). We did not find significant inter-strain differences in sensitivity to neither the HDPs nor hydrogen peroxide. In general, the S. aureus strains were more sensitive to plectasin than L. monocytogenes, which is in concordance with previous findings [5]. The four non-human model peptides represent each of the three classes of host defense peptides and were similar in MIC spectrum to HBD-3.

Generally, L. monocytogenes strains from clinical cases are more virulent than strains isolated from environmental sources such as food [32]. Therefore, one could expect that the clinical isolates would be more tolerant to HDPs or hydrogen peroxide. However, no consistent patterns in tolerance were observed when the strains were grouped according to their origin.

The lack of difference between L. monocytogenes strains to the eukaryotic cationic peptides tested here is in contrast to the differences in sensitivity of strains to the bacterial cationic peptides, bacteriocins, that have been observed in several studies [33–35]. The differences could, however, not be correlated to neither strain origin [33] nor serovar [35] and may simply reflect the natural variation within the bacterial population.

There was no similarity in the S. aureus strains' performance in the virulence factor assays and their tolerance to the antimicrobial compounds of the innate immune defense system. Compared to L. monocytogenes, the disease spectrum of S. aureus is more complex. To assess the differences in phenotypic behavior of the S. aureus strains in parallel to the data we have obtained earlier for L. monocytogenes [27, 28], we analyzed the S. aureus strains for several virulence factors that all contribute to evasion of the neutrophil attack at the site of infection [36]. There was considerably variation between the S. aureus strains for each of the single virulence factors tested in this study. However, none of the strains could be identified as generally more or less virulent than the rest and probably reflect that each strain is more or less specialized or virulent in one (or more) type(s) of infection(s).

The growth of L. monocytogenes and S. aureus strains in human whole blood and lethality in C. elegans demonstrated that the strains differed in growth in such eukaryotic systems but this could not be matched to tolerance to host defense peptides or hydrogen peroxide. Likewise, there was no statistical correlation between the growth of L. monocytogenes in whole blood and the invasive ability in Caco-2 cells [27] or the lethality in C. elegans [28]. The ability of S. aureus to grow in human whole blood was not paralleled by any of the virulence parameters tested here. Liu and co-workers showed that disruption of the carotenoid biosynthesis impaired the resistance to both neutrophil and whole blood killing [37]. We found that strain 2148-jvi which had an intermediate carotenoid production grew poorly in human whole blood, whereas both 8325-4 and KES 626 which had a low carotenoid production grew very well in whole blood. There was no correlation between the S. aureus strains' growth in whole blood and their lethality in C. elegans, although the best and the poorest survivor (KES 626 and 2148-jvi, respectively) also were the fastest and the slowest to kill the worms. Blood from different donors may have different bactericidal activity and we initially compared the sensitivity of L. monocytogenes EGD to blood from three donors. The strain was equally sensitive to all three and the experiments were therefore performed with blood from only one donor.

The HDPs are widespread as a diverse and very well-conserved part of the defense system in all eukaryotes and have retained their antimicrobial activity for millions of years, hence the acquisition of resistance towards HDPs is considered unlikely. This has prompted the use of the design principles of these molecules for the design of new anti-infective drugs [3, 38]. Indeed, several novel HDPs have been discovered and are thought to represent one of the most innovative families of anti-infective agents that have been characterized over the last 25 years [4, 5]. In addition, HDPs have also been suggested as natural alternatives to chemical food preservatives [39–41].

Our data indicate that such host defense peptides would be well suited for both purposes as they appeared to have broad bactericidal effect on human pathogenic bacteria with different expression patterns of virulence factors. The lack of natural strains with a particular high tolerance to the peptides indicates that they are likely to be effective independently of the particular strain causing the infection.

Conclusion

We found that a collection of L. monocytogenes and S. aureus strains did not differ in tolerance to single components of the innate immune system despite representing a broad spectrum of phenotypically different organisms. Four non-human host defense peptides were similar in activity profile (MIC value spectrum) to the human HBD-3 when examined against a sub-selection of strains. When the same sub-selection was tested in human whole blood and C. elegans worms, differences between strains were found in each assay but there was no correlation between the two models. The broad activity of the HDPs against several strains of a pathogenic species indicates that natural resistance is not present in a population and these HDPs may indeed, as suggested, be useful as novel antimicrobials.

References

  1. Brogden KA, Ackermann M, Mccray PB, Tack BF: Antimicrobial peptides in animals and their role in host defences. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003, 22: 465-478. 10.1016/S0924-8579(03)00180-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marshall SH, Arenas G: Antimicrobial peptides: A natural alternative to chemical antibiotics and a potential for applied biotechnology. Elec J Biotechnol. 2003, 6: 271-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zasloff M: Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature. 2002, 415: 389-395. 10.1038/415389a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrès E, Dimarcq JL: Cationic antimicrobial peptides: update of clinical development. J Intern Med. 2004, 255: 519-520. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01278.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mygind PH, Fischer RL, Schnorr KM, Hansen MT, Sonksen CP, Ludvigsen S, Raventos D, Buskov S, Christensen B, De Maria L, et al.: Plectasin is a peptide antibiotic with therapeutic potential from a saprophytic fungus. Nature. 2005, 437: 975-980. 10.1038/nature04051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brogden KA: Antimicrobial peptides: Poreformers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?. Nat Rev Micro. 2005, 3: 238-250. 10.1038/nrmicro1098.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peschel A, Otto M, Jack RW, Kalbacher H, Jung G, Gotz F: Inactivation of the dlt Operon in Staphylococcus aureus Confers Sensitivity to Defensins, Protegrins, and Other Antimicrobial Peptides. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 8405-8410. 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peschel A, Jack RW, Otto M, Collins LV, Staubitz P, Nicholson G, Kalbacher H, Nieuwenhuizen WF, Jung G, Tarkowski A, et al.: Staphylococcus aureus Resistance to Human Defensins and Evasion of Neutrophil Killing via the Novel Virulence Factor MprF Is Based on Modification of Membrane Lipids with L-Lysine. J Exp Med. 2001, 193: 1067-1076. 10.1084/jem.193.9.1067.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buncic S, Avery SM, Rocourt J, Dimitrijevic M: Can food-related environmental factors induce different behaviour in two key serovars, 4b and 1/2a, of Listeria monocytogenes?. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001, 65: 201-212. 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00524-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Melles DC, Gorkink RFJ, Boelens HAM, Snijders SV, Peeters JK, Moorhouse MJ, Spek van der PJ, van Leeuwen WB, Simons G, Verbrugh HA, et al.: Natural population dynamics and expansion of pathogenic clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Invest. 2004, 114: 1732-1740.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peacock SJ, Moore CE, Justice A, Kantzanou M, Story L, Mackie K, O'Neill G, Day NPJ: Virulent Combinations of Adhesin and Toxin Genes in Natural Populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 4987-4996. 10.1128/IAI.70.9.4987-4996.2002.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roche SM, Velge P, Bottreau E, Durier C, Marquet-van der Mee N, Pardon P: Assessment of the virulence of Listeria monocytogenes: agreement between a plaque-forming assay with HT-29 cells and infection of immunocompetent mice. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001, 68: 33-44. 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00460-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lianou A, Stopforth JD, Yoon Y, Wiedmann M, Sofos JN: Growth and Stress Resistance Variation in Culture Broth among Listeria monocytogenes Strains of Various Serotypes and Origins. J Food Prot. 2006, 69: 2640-2647.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rode TM, Langsrud S, Holck A, Moretro T: Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under food-related stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007, 116: 372-383. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ando T, Watanabe S: A New Method for Fractionation of Protamines and Amino Acid Sequences of Salmine and 3 Components of Iridine. Int J Protein Res. 1969, 1: 221-224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Steinstraesser L, Tack BF, Waring AJ, Hong T, Boo LM, Fan MH, Remick DI, Su GL, Lehrer RI, Wang SC: Activity of Novispirin G10 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa In Vitro and in Infected Burns. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46: 1837-1844. 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1837-1844.2002.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vazquez-Boland JA, Kuhn M, Berche P, Chakraborty T, Dominguez-Bernal G, Goebel W, Gonzalez-Zorn B, Wehland J, Kreft J: Listeria Pathogenesis and Molecular Virulence Determinants. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001, 14: 584-640. 10.1128/CMR.14.3.584-640.2001.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lowy FD: Staphylococcus aureus Infections. N Engl J Med. 1998, 339: 520-532. 10.1056/NEJM199808203390806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Guideline M7-A7: Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard. 2006, Pennsylvania: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Seventh

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lehrer RI, Rosenman M, Harwig SSSL, Jackson R, Eisenhauer P: Ultrasensitive Assays for Endogenous Antimicrobial Polypeptides. J Immunol Methods. 1991, 137: 167-173. 10.1016/0022-1759(91)90021-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dominguez Rodriguez L, Vazquez Boland JA, Fernandez Garayzabal JF, Echalecu Tranchant P, Gomez-Lucia E, Rodriguez Ferri EF, Suarez Fernandez G: Microplate technique to determine hemolytic activity for routine typing of Listeria strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1986, 24: 99-103.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leimeister-Wachter M, Chakraborty T: Detection of listeriolysin, the thiol-dependent hemolysin in Listeria monocytogenes, Listeria ivanovii, and Listeria seeligeri. Infect Immun. 1989, 57: 2350-2357.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fitzgerald JR, Hartigan PJ, Meaney WJ, Smyth CJ: Molecular population and virulence factor analysis of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine intramammary infection. J Appl Microbiol. 2000, 88: 1028-1037. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01071.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fung DYC, Petrishko DT: Capillary Tube Catalase Test. Appl Microbiol. 1973, 26: 631-632.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomsen LE, Slutz SS, Tan MW, Ingmer H: Caenorhabditis elegans Is a Model Host for Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72: 1700-1701. 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1700-1701.2006.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schnabel H, Schnabel R: An Organ-Specific Differentiation Gene, pha-1, from Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1990, 250: 686-688. 10.1126/science.250.4981.686.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jensen A, Larsen MH, Ingmer H, Vogel BF, Gram L: Sodium Chloride Enhances Adherence and Aggregation and Strain Variation Influences Invasiveness of Listeria monocytogenes Strains. J Food Prot. 2007, 70: 592-599.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jensen A, Thomsen LE, Jørgensen RL, Larsen MH, Roldgaard BB, Christensen BB, Vogel BF, Gram L, Ingmer H: Processing plant persistent strains of Listeria monocytogenes appear to have a lower virulence potential than clinical strains in selected virulence models. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008, 123: 254-261. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.02.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Harder J, Bartels J, Christophers E, Schroder JM: Isolation and Characterization of Human Beta-Defensin 3, a Novel Human Inducible Peptide Antibiotic. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 5707-5713. 10.1074/jbc.M008557200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Christensson B, Hedstrom SA: Biochemical and Biological Properties of Staphylococcus aureus Septicemia Strains in Relation to Clinical Characteristics. Scand J Infect Dis. 1986, 18: 297-303. 10.3109/00365548609032340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Clyne M, De Azavedo J, Carlson E, Arbuthnott J: Production of gamma-hemolysin and lack of production of alpha-hemolysin by Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with toxic shock syndrome. J Clin Microbiol. 1988, 26: 535-539.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Norrung B, Andersen JK: Variations in virulence between different electrophoretic types of Listeria monocytogenes. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2000, 30: 228-232. 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2000.00704.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Larsen AG, Norrung B: Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by Bavaricin-A, A Bacteriocin Produced by Lactobacillus bavaricus Mi401. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1993, 17: 132-134. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1993.tb01441.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rodriguiez JL, Gaya P, Medina M, Nuñez M: Bactericidal Effect of Enterocin 4 on Listeria monocytogenes in a Model Dairy System. J Food Prot. 1997, 60: 28-32.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rasch M, Knochel S: Variations in tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes to nisin, pediocin PA-1 and bavaricin A. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998, 27: 275-278. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1998.00433.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Foster TJ: Immune evasion by staphylococci. Nat Rev Micro. 2005, 3: 948-958. 10.1038/nrmicro1289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu GY, Essex A, Buchanan JT, Datta V, Hoffman HM, Bastian JF, Fierer J, Nizet V: Staphylococcus aureus golden pigment impairs neutrophil killing and promotes virulence through its antioxidant activity. J Exp Med. 2005, 202: 209-215. 10.1084/jem.20050846.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hancock REW, Sahl HG: Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat Biotech. 2006, 24: 1551-1557. 10.1038/nbt1267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ueno R, Fujita Y, Yamamoto M, Kozakai H: Method of inhibiting multiplication of Bacillus cereus. 873106751(EP 0 273 606 B1). 16-10-1991. 4-12-1987

  40. Ueno R, Fujita Y, Nagamura Y, Kamino Y, Tabata A: Method for preserving food. 899072656(EP 0 372 091 B1). 18-9-1996. 9-6-1989

  41. Potter R, Hansen LT, Gill TA: Inhibition of foodborne bacteria by native and modified protamine: Importance of electrostatic interactions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005, 103: 23-34. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vogel BF, Huss HH, Ojeniyi B, Ahrens P, Gram L: Elucidation of Listeria monocytogenes Contamination Routes in Cold-Smoked Salmon Processing Plants Detected by DNA-Based Typing Methods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001, 67: 2586-2595. 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2586-2595.2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wulff G, Gram L, Ahrens P, Vogel BF: One group of genetically similar Listeria monocytogenes strains frequently dominates and persists in several fish slaughter- and smokehouses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72: 4313-4322. 10.1128/AEM.02288-05.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Embarek PKB, Huss HH: Heat resistance of Listeria monocytogenes in vacuum packaged pasteurized fish fillets. Int J Food Microbiol. 1993, 20: 85-95. 10.1016/0168-1605(93)90096-Y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vogel BF, Jorgensen LV, Ojeniyi B, Huss HH, Gram L: Diversity of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from cold-smoked salmon produced in different smokehouses as assessed by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA analyses. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001, 65: 83-92. 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00503-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rea RB, Gahan CGM, Hill C: Disruption of Putative Regulatory Loci in Listeria monocytogenes Demonstrates a Significant Role for Fur and PerR in Virulence. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 717-727. 10.1128/IAI.72.2.717-727.2004.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Olsen KN, Larsen MH, Gahan CGM, Kallipolitis B, Wolf XA, Rea R, Hill C, Ingmer H: The Dps-like protein Fri of Listeria monocytogenes promotes stress tolerance and intracellular multiplication in macrophage-like cells. Microbiology. 2005, 151: 925-933. 10.1099/mic.0.27552-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Brondsted L, Kallipolitis BH, Ingmer H, Knochel S: kdpE and a putative RsbQ homologue contribute to growth of Listeria monocytogenes at high osmolarity and low temperature. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003, 219: 233-239. 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00052-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Larsen CN, Norrung B, Sommer HM, Jakobsen M: In Vitro and In Vivo Invasiveness of Different Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Types of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002, 68: 5698-5703.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Novick R: Properties of a cryptic high-frequency transducing phage in Staphylococcus aureus. Virology. 1967, 33: 155-166. 10.1016/0042-6822(67)90105-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Iordanescu S, Surdeanu M: Two restriction modification systems in Staphylococcus aureus NCTC8325. J Gen Microbiol. 1976, 96: 277-281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gjødsbøl K, Christensen JJ, Karlsmark T, Jørgensen B, Klein BM, Krogfeldt KA: Multiple bacterial species reside in chronic wounds: a longitudinal study. Int Wound J. 2006, 3: 225-231. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00159.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Anders Folkesson and Søren Molin, Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, for their help in the design of the radial diffusion assay. The E. coli OP50 and C. elegans strains used in this work are provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis). We thank Arshnee Moodley, Department of Disease Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, for her help on spa typing of the S. aureus strains. We are very grateful to Bo Munk Jørgensen, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, for his help with the statistical analyses. CTG was funded by a PhD grant from the Technical University of Denmark.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, Bldg. 221, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark

    Caroline Trebbien Gottlieb & Lone Gram

  2. Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Stigbøjlen 4, DK-1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark

    Line Elnif Thomsen & Hanne Ingmer

  3. Novozymes A/S, Krogshøjvej 36, DK-2880, Bagsværd, Denmark

    Per Holse Mygind & Hans-Henrik Kristensen

Authors
  1. Caroline Trebbien Gottlieb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Line Elnif Thomsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hanne Ingmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Per Holse Mygind
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hans-Henrik Kristensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lone Gram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Trebbien Gottlieb.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

CTG carried out the MIC determinations, the testing of extracellular virulence factors in S. aureus, the human whole blood killing assays, and drafted the manuscript. LET carried out the C. elegans killing assay and helped to draft the manuscript. HI participated in the design of the study and helped to draft and revise the manuscript. PHM and HHK supplied the host defense peptides and participated in the design of the MIC determinations. LG participated in the design and coordination of the study and helped drafting and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gottlieb, C.T., Thomsen, L.E., Ingmer, H. et al. Antimicrobial peptides effectively kill a broad spectrum of Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus strains independently of origin, sub-type, or virulence factor expression. BMC Microbiol 8, 205 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-205

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-205

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us