Evaluation of an immunomagnetic separation method to capture Candida yeasts cells in blood
© Apaire-Marchais et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 19 February 2008
Accepted: 22 September 2008
Published: 22 September 2008
Candida species have become the fourth most-frequent cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections in immunocompromised patients. Therefore, rapid identification of pathogenic fungi to species level has been considered critical for treatment. Conventional diagnostic procedures such as blood culture or biochemical tests are lacking both sensitivity and species specificity, so development of rapid diagnostic is essential.
An immunomagnetic method involving anti-Candida monoclonal antibodies was developed to capture and concentrate in human blood four different species of Candida cells responsible for invasive yeast infections. In comparison with an automated blood culture, processing time of immunomagnetic separation is shorter, saving at least 24 hours to obtain colonies before identification.
Thus, this easy to use method provides a promising basis for concentrating all Candida species in blood to improve sensitivity before identification.
Candida spp. is now the fourth most frequent cause of nosocomial blood-stream infections in critically ill patients and Candida. albicans is the most prevalent species [1, 2]. Prevalence of other species such as Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida krusei varies according to clinical conditions . Rapid isolation and identification of pathogenic yeasts to species level is critical for treatment. Conventional diagnostic procedures, such as blood culture and biochemical tests lack the degree of sensitivity and specificity that would ensure reliable and early diagnosis of invasive Candida infections [4, 5]. As a consequence, methods based on the amplification and detection of yeast DNA have been developed. Conventional PCR techniques and now real-time PCR assays are performed for specific and rapid detection and identification of fungi from clinical isolates . However, as yeast load is often lower than 10 CFU per ml of blood, even in patients suffering from invasive yeast infection , sensitivity is the major drawback with these techniques. Sensitivity can be improved by coupling PCR method with other methods, such as hybridization assay , by using nested [5, 9] or by optimising DNA extraction methods [10, 11]. However availability of pure DNA without PCR inhibitors is essential. Another approach is to concentrate yeast cells before culture or DNA extraction using techniques such as the immunomagnetic separation method (IMS) where magnetic beads coated with monoclonal antibodies are used to capture yeast cells present in clinical specimens.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of IMS in improving culture yields. The effectiveness of the IMS was determined and the time to obtain colonies of Candida species was compared to that of the Bactec Mycosis-IC/F automated blood culture system. Human blood artificially contaminated with C. albicans, C. tropicalis which are the most frequently strains isolated in candidemia was used. C. glabrata and C. krusei were also included in the study because of their reduced susceptibility i.e. higher resistance to fluconazole.
Results and discussion
Analytical sensitivity of IMS
Analytical sensitivity of Candida cells capture with IMS method
Time (hours) of positive blood culture
(mean ± SD)a
CFU/ml in initial contaminated blood
CFU/ml after IMS
(mean ± SD)a
(% ± SD)ab
Candida albicans 5575
25.45 ± 0.59
8.8 ± 0.6
27.5 ± 1.9
Candida albicans ATCC 66396
25.95 ± 1.46
1.75 ± 0.3
29.1 ± 3.8
Candida krusei 5374
22.26 ± 0.48
3.25 ± 0.5
10.8 ± 1.7
Candida krusei 5481
16.20 ± 0.28
17.3 ± 2.5
43.2 ± 6.2
Candida glabrata 5511
25.05 ± 0.5
7.6 ± 1.3
38 ± 6.4
Candida glabrata 5484
25.38 ± 0.58
3.8 ± 0.6
38 ± 6.3
Candida tropicalis 5437
19.02 ± 0.88
4.8 ± 2.2
16 ± 3.8
Candida tropicalis 5395
17.51 ± 0.50
4.3 ± 2.2
14.3 ± 7.3
IMS method in comparison with conventional procedures
The IMS method has several advantages over conventional methods: it is easy to use, no special equipment is required, processing time of IMS is shorter.
In our study, with the automated blood culture method, microbial growth could be detected for all strains of Candida after an incubation of about 24 h (Table 1). However, the viable colonies needed to perform identification were only obtained after subsequent sub-culturing and this required a further 24-h incubation. Despite efforts made by many investigators, early and rapid diagnosis of systemic yeast infections remains limited. Culture detection of Candida species is often delayed or remains negative because of slow or absent growth of yeast isolates from clinical specimens. Blood cultures are positive for fewer than 50% of patients with invasive candidiasis [2, 5]. Then, time to obtain colonies is shorter with IMS, saving at least 24 h in comparison with blood culture. Of course, further optimization should seek for best IMS recovery rates to increase its lower limit of detection.
In addition, as demonstrated by other authors, IMS could increase the efficiency of culture or the yield of nucleic acid before a DNA extraction. PCR assays that amplify a highly conserved sequence of the multicopy rRNA gene were developed using DNA extracts from blood specimens. 1 to 5 CFU/ml has been reported as a lower limit for DNA detection by PCR. It was shown that IMS combined with real-time PCR to detect Plasmodium falciparum in blood samples , or bacteria such as Escherichia coli 0157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in food [13–15], or some viruses (Hepatitis A virus, Norovirus) from environmental samples or food [16, 17] is particularly attractive because of the potential for concentrating micro-organisms. Therefore IMS, in conjunction with PCR, considered as one of the most sensitive methods to detect low levels of DNA from pathogens in clinical samples, could be a helpful tool in the diagnosis of candidemia.
In our study, IMS has been used to capture yeast cells from artificially contaminated human blood using magnetic beads coated with monoclonal antibodies (MAb 5B2 and MAb 6B3) specific to surface antigens of Candida. When numbers of CFU ranged from 6 to 40 CFU per ml of blood, IMS allowed immunocapture for the four Candida species studied. We are fully aware that it is a study using artificially contaminated blood and another study is now in progress to evaluate what really happens in natural candidemia.
IMS should be useful in order to facilitate the isolation of yeasts from blood saving at least 24 h to obtain colonies before classic identification.
Strains and culture conditions
One ATCC reference strain and 7 Candida spp. isolated from clinical samples taken during invasive candidiasis were used: C. albicans ATCC 66396, 1 clinical strains of C. albicans (5575), two clinical isolates of each of C. glabrata (5511, 5484),C. krusei (5374, 5481), and C. tropicalis (5437, 5395).
Blastoconidia were grown for 24 h at 37°C on Sabouraud-dextrose-agar (SDA) containing chloramphenicol 1 mg/ml (SDA-C). Then 1 colony was suspended in 10 ml of sterile distilled water and the suspension was plated on SDA-C and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Blastoconidia were removed with a rubber policeman and suspended into 4 ml of sterile distilled water. A dilution of 0.5 × 10-6 of this suspension was prepared in distilled water to obtain a working yeast suspension and then the number of CFU was calculated by plating 100 μl of this fungal dilution on SDA-C.
Immunomagnetic separation method versus blood culture
Immunomagnetic beads (Estapor® Merck, France) coated with MAb 5B2 or MAb 6B3 (2 mg/ml) were obtained from SR2B (Avrillé, France) [18, 19]. MAb 5B2 recognises the predominantly polysaccharidic antigen present on the cell surface of several species of Candida (C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis) . It is thought that the reactive structures recognised by MAb 5B2 consist of mannopyranosyl units bound through β(1–2) linkages. MAb 6B3 reacts specifically with a cell wall surface antigen that was found to be expressed by all C. krusei strains or isolates .
Following the recommendations of the manufacturer of the automated culture system that 3 to 10 ml of blood should be inoculated into Bactec Mycosis-IC/F culture vials (Becton Dickinson, Pont de Claix, France), both methods, IMS and blood culture, were carried out using samples of 4 ml of human blood for consistency.
200 μl samples of the working yeast suspension were added to 10 ml of human blood. For the blood used in this study, our institution has an agreement with the «Etablissement Français du Sang» for research experiments. After shaking, 4 ml of this contaminated blood were inoculated into Bactec fungal medium and microbial growth was detected by fluorescence (Bactec BD9240, Beckton Dickinson). When positive, samples were sub-cultured onto SDA-C medium to obtain colonies.
Separately, for the IMS procedure, 4 ml of the same yeast contaminated blood were lysed using 4 ml of lysis buffer consisting of 5 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA (pH 8) and 2% Triton X® 100 by shaking for 5 min at 22°C, in order to lyse erythrocytes and leukocytes and particularly polynuclear neutrophils which could contain intracytoplasmic yeasts. A mix of 50 μl magnetic beads coated with MAb 5B2 and 50 μl of magnetic beads coated with MAb 6B3, were then added. After incubation for 30 min at 22°C in an incubator (Mini Artic, Jouan, France) with gentle agitation on a sample mixer (Dynal, France), the tubes were put in a magnetic device (Dynal) in order to separate the beads from the supernatant which was discarded. The beads were then re-suspended in 100 μl of 5 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA (pH 8) before being plated onto SDA-C. After incubation for 24 h at 37°C, number of CFU, corresponding to viable cells which was obtained from 4 ml of blood were expressed per 1 ml of blood. This number of CFU per 1 ml after IMS was compared with the number of CFU determined from 1 ml of blood in the initial contaminated blood. The results were expressed in percentages of immunocaptured cells. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
We wish to thank SR2B, France for providing immunomagnetic beads coated with MAbs 5B2 and 6B3.
- Jarvis WR: Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections, with emphasis on Candida species. Clin Infect Dis. 1995, 20: 1526-1530.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moreira-Oliveira MS, Mikami Y, Miyaji M, Imai T, Schreiber AZ, Moretti ML: Diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction and blood culture: prospective study in high-risk population and identification of variables associated with development of candidemia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005, 24: 721-726. 10.1007/s10096-005-0041-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eggimann P, Garbino J, Pittet D: Epidemiology of Candida species infections in critically ill non-immunosuppressed patients. Lancet. 2003, 3: 685-702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stevens DA: Diagnosis of fungal infections: current status. J Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2002, 49: 11-19. 10.1093/jac/49.1.11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- White PL, Shetty A, Barnes RA: Detection of seven Candida species using the light cycler system. J Med Microbiol. 2003, 52: 229-238. 10.1099/jmm.0.05049-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hsu MC, Chen KW, Lo HJ, Chen YC, Liao MH, Lin YH, Li SY: Species identification of medically important fungi by use of real-time light cycler PCR. J Med Microbiol. 2003, 52: 1071-1076. 10.1099/jmm.0.05302-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loeffler J, Henke N, Hebart H, Schmidt D, Hagmeyer L, Schumacher U, Einsele H: Quantification of fungal DNA by using fluorescence resonance energy transfer and the light cycler system. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 586-590.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wahyuningsih R, Freisleben HJ, Sonntag HG, Schnitzler P: Simple and rapid detection of Candida albicans DNA in serum by PCR for diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 3016-3021.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alam FF, Mustafa AS, Khan ZU: Comparative evaluation of (1–3)-β-D-glucan, mannan and anti-mannan antibodies, and Candida species-specific snPCR in patients with candidemia. BMC Infect dis. 2007, 7: 103-10.1186/1471-2334-7-103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Einsele H, Hebart H, Roller G, Löffler J, Rothenhöfer I, Müller CA, Bowden RA, van Burik JA, Engelhard D, Kanz L, Schumacher U: Detection and identification of fungal pathogens in blood by using molecular probes. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 1353-1360.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loeffler J, Hebart H, Schumacher U, Reitze H, Einsele H: Comparison of different methods for extraction of DNA of fungal pathogens from cultures and blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 3311-3312.Google Scholar
- Seedod N, Lundeberg J, Hedrum A, Aslund L, Holder A, Thaithong S, Uhlen M: Immunomagnetic purification to facilitate DNA diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum. J Clin Microbiol. 1993, 31: 2715-2719.Google Scholar
- Fu Z, Rogelj S, Kieft TL: Rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by immunomagnetic separation and real-time PCR. Int J food Microbiol. 2005, 99: 47-57. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.07.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gray KM, Bhunia AK: Specific detection of cytopathogenic Listeria monocytogenes using a two-step method of immunoseparation and cytotoxicity analysis. J Microbiol Methods. 2005, 60: 259-268. 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.10.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Li Y, Mustaphai A: Rapid and simultaneous quantitation of Escherichia coli 0157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella in ground beef by multiplex real-time PCR and immunomagnetic separation. J Food Prot. 2007, 7: 1366-1372.Google Scholar
- Abd El Galil KH, El Sokkary MA, Kheira SM, Salazar AM, Yates MV, Chen W, Mulchandani A: Combined immunomagnetic separation-molecular beacon-reverse transcription-PCR assay for detection of hepatitis A virus from environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70: 4371-4374. 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4371-4374.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kobayashi S, Natori K, Takeda N, Sakae K: Immunomagnetic capture RT-PCR for detection of Norovirus from foods implicated in a foodborne outbreak. Microbiol Immunol. 2004, 48: 201-204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hopwood V, Poulain D, Fortier B, Evans G, Vernes A: A monoclonal antibody to a cell wall component of Candida albicans. Infect Immun. 1986, 54: 222-227.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robert R, Faure O, Carloti A, Lebeau B, Bernard C, Marot-Leblond A, Grillot R, Senet JM: A monoclonal antibody specific to surface antigen on Candida krusei. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1998, 5: 121-124.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trinel PA, Faille C, Jacquinot PM, Cailliez JC, Poulain D: Mapping of Candida albicans oligomannosidic epitopes by using monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun. 1992, 60: 3845-3851.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.