Traditional gene replacement procedures are still time-consuming. They usually necessitate cloning of the gene to be mutated, insertional inactivation of the gene with an antibiotic resistance cassette and exchange of the plasmid-borne mutant allele with the bacterial chromosome. PCR and recombinational technologies can be exploited to substantially accelerate virtually all steps involved in the gene replacement process.
Results
We describe a method for rapid generation of unmarked P. aeruginosa deletion mutants. Three partially overlapping DNA fragments are amplified and then spliced together in vitro by overlap extension PCR. The resulting DNA fragment is cloned in vitro into the Gateway vector pDONR221 and then recombined into the Gateway-compatible gene replacement vector pEX18ApGW. The plasmid-borne deletions are next transferred to the P. aeruginosa chromosome by homologous recombination. Unmarked deletion mutants are finally obtained by Flp-mediated excision of the antibiotic resistance marker. The method was applied to deletion of 25 P. aeruginosa genes encoding transcriptional regulators of the GntR family.
Conclusion
While maintaining the key features of traditional gene replacement procedures, for example, suicide delivery vectors, antibiotic resistance selection and sucrose counterselection, the method described here is considerably faster due to streamlining of some of the key steps involved in the process, especially plasmid-borne mutant allele construction and its transfer into the target host. With appropriate modifications, the method should be applicable to other bacteria.
Background
The elucidation of the P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 genome sequence in 2000 [1] opened the doors for genome- and proteome-scale research with this important opportunistic pathogen. These include the availability of commercial (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) P. aeruginosa GeneChips® for transcriptome analyses [2], as well as the P. aeruginosa PAO1 gene collection for high-throughput expression and purification of recombinant proteins [3]. A comprehensive transposon mutant library was generated containing over 30,000 sequence-defined mutants, corresponding to an average of five insertions per gene [4].
However, despite the development of many genetic tools for P. aeruginosa over the past decade [5, 6], isolation of defined deletion mutants is still a relatively tedious process, which relies on construction of deletion alleles, most often tagged with an antibiotic resistance gene, on a suicide plasmid, followed by recombination of the plasmid-borne deletions into the chromosome, usually after conjugal transfer of the suicide plasmid (reviewed in [6]). Merodiploids arising from chromosomal integration of the suicide plasmid are resolved by utilization of a counterselectable marker, most often Bacillus subtilis sacB (sucrose counterselection) [7] or, less frequently, rpsL (streptomycin counterselection)[8]. In cases where the antibiotic selection markers are flanked by site specific recombination sites, e.g., the Flp recombinase target (FRT) [9] or Cre recombinase (loxP) [10] sites, they can subsequently be deleted from the chromosome, resulting in unmarked deletion mutants.
Unfortunately, the previously described method for one-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli using PCR products [11] does not work in P. aeruginosa, although we have used a modification [12] of this approach where the target gene is first cloned into a plasmid, followed by λ RED-mediated recombination of a PCR-generated mutated copy of the gene [13]. Here, we describe a more streamlined method for generation of chromosomal deletion mutants. In this method, a "mutant" fragment containing the 5' and 3' flanking regions of the target gene plus the antibiotic resistance gene is assembled by a modified [14] PCR overlap extension protocol [15] and then cloned into a suicide vector using the Gateway recombinational cloning system, similarly to a previously described method [16]. The plasmid-borne deletion allele is then transferred to P. aeruginosa utilizing a rapid transformation procedure and recombined into the chromosome. The transformants are often merodiploids which are then resolved by sucrose counterselection against the undesired wild-type sequences. The antibiotic resistance marker is subsequently deleted from the chromosome by Flp recombinase.
Results
Construction of a Gateway-compatible suicide vector
We previously described the pEX family of relatively small, fully sequenced suicide plasmids which are now widely used for gene replacement experiments in P. aeruginosa and related bacteria [9]. Wolfgang et al. [16] recently described a Gateway-compatible pEX18Gm derivative. Here, we modified pEX18Ap for use as a Gateway destination vector for cloning of mutations marked with a gentamycin resistance (Gmr) encoding gene. We prefer using the Gmr marker because it is more easily transferable between P. aeruginosa chromosomes by transformation with chromosomal DNA fragments when compared to other selection markers [17]. The resulting vector pEX18ApGW (Fig. 1) contains the functional sequences for recombination-based cloning (attR1 and attR2) and the ccdB counterselection marker, while maintaining the sacB counterselection marker for downstream resolution of merodiploids.
Figure 1
Map of the Gateway-compatible pEX18ApGW. This vector was derived by cloning a Gateway conversion fragment (grey) into the multiple cloning site of pEX18Ap (black). Only selected restriction enzyme cleavage sites are shown. Abbreviations: attR1 and attR2, bacteriophage λ recombination sites; bla, β-lactamase-encoding gene; cat, chloramphenicol acetyl transferase-encoding gene; ccdB, gene encoding gyrase-modifying enzyme (CcdB poisons host DNA gyrase by forming a covalent complex with the DNA gyrase A subunit and thus serves as a counter-selectable marker in gyrA+ cloning hosts [25]); ori, ColE1-derived replication origin; oriT, origin of conjugal transfer; sacB, Bacillus subtilis levansucrase-encoding gene. The sequence of this plasmid was deposited in GenBank and assigned accession number AY928469.
Generation of a mutant fragment by PCR overlap extension
The amplification of each mutant fragment was achieved in a two step PCR that required 8 PCR primers, 4 of which were unique for each fragment to be mutated and 4 of which were common primers (Table 1). The gene-specific portions of the unique primers were designed to yield Tm's of 55–57°C and PCR fragments ranging from ~200 to 600 bp. These parameters enabled utilization of the same PCR conditions for different target genes, while at the same time provided for amplification of sufficient chromosomal DNA to allow for efficient homologous recombination of plasmid-borne sequence with the chromosome.
Table 1
PCR oligonucleotides
Name
Sequence (5'→3')1
Gene-specific primers
G-UpF-GWL2
TACAAAAAAGCAGGCTccgatcagttgcaacacatc
G-UpR-Gm2
TCAGAGCGCTTTTGAAGCTAATTCGttgttcctgcaccaccatct
G-DnF-Gm2
AGGAACTTCAAGATCCCCAATTCGccggcgagttccacctgaa
G-DnR-GWR2
TACAAGAAAGCTGGGTggttgagcttgctgtcgata
Common primers
Gm-F
CGAATTAGCTTCAAAAGCGCTCTGA
Gm-R
CGAATTGGGGATCTTGAAGTTCCT
GW-attB 1
GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCT
GW-attB 2
GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGT
1Sequences in capital letters are common for all genes amplified and overlap with the Gm or attB primer sequences. Lower-case letters indicate gene-specific sequences, here PA1520. PCR oligonucleotide sequences for all 27 genes amplified in this study are given in Table 2 (see Additional file 1).
2G, gene specific sequence, here PA1520.
The basic strategy for generation of the mutant fragment by PCR overlap extension is illustrated in Fig. 2. In PCR1, the four gene-specific primers are used to amplify the 5' and 3' regions of the target gene. Simultaneously, two of the common primers, Gm-F and Gm-R, are used to amplify the Gmr cassette flanked by FRT sites from a pPS856 template. Since the Gmr fragment is used for all constructs, it can be prepared in larger amounts ahead of time and stored until needed. Fig. 3A illustrates typical results of PCR1 utilizing the example of P. aeruginosa gene PA1520, encoding a putative transcriptional regulator of the GntR family. When we adhered to the prescribed PCR conditions, the amplified fragments were very clean. It was especially prudent to follow the conditions for PCR amplification of the GmrFRT fragment since the FRT sites possess significant secondary structures.
Figure 2
Schematic illustration of mutant fragment generation by overlap extension PCR. During first round PCR (PCR1), the 5' and 3' ends of the target genes, as well as the gentamycin (Gm) resistance cassette are amplified using four gene-specific primers (G-UpF-GWL, G-UpR-Gm, G-DnF-Gm and G-DnR-GWR) and the common Gm-specific primers (Gm-F and Gm-R). This generates three fragments with partial overlaps either to each other (indicated by the blue boxes signifying Gm overlap) or the attB1 and attB2 λ recombination sites (indicated by the green and pink boxes). These purified fragments are then assembled in vitro by overlap extension during second round PCR (PCR2) using common primers GW-attB 1 and GW-attB 2, resulting in a recombination-proficient mutant PCR fragment.
Figure 3
PCR amplification of the GmFRTcassette,PA1520gene fragments and the overlap extension product. A. First round PCR fragments. The left panel illustrates amplification of the 1,053-bp Gmr fragment from pPS856 which contains 24 bp (right) and 25 bp (left) overlaps with the PA1520' and 'PA1520 fragments (blue boxes). The right panel illustrates amplification of the PA1520' and 'PA1520 fragments. The 5' fragment contains 388 bp of chromosomal DNA, 25 bp overlapping the left side of the Gmr fragment and 16 bp overlapping the GW-attB1 primer. Similarly, the 3' fragment contains 236 bp of chromosomal DNA, 24 bp overlapping the right side of the Gmr fragment and 16 bp overlapping the GW-attB2 primer. The sequences of the gene-specific and common primers are listed in Table 1. B. Second round PCR. The purified fragments shown in panel A were used in the second round PCR illustrated in Fig. 2 to derive the indicated attB1-PA1520'-FRT-Gm-FRT-'PA1520-attB2 fragment. The entire 50 μl second round PCR reaction was subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis. The desired DNA fragment constituting the major product marked by the arrow was excised from the gel, purified and then used for the BP clonase reaction. Lanes labeled M in both panels contained Hi-Lo molecular size markers from Minnesota Molecular (Minneapolis, MN).
The PCR fragments were gel-purified and equal amounts (50 ng) of each were combined for PCR2. PCR2 was allowed to proceed for 3 cycles in the absence of exogenous primers, which for PA1520 yields the intermittent 1,709 bp 'attB1-PA1520'-FRT-Gm-FRT-'PA1520-attB2' fragment illustrated in Fig 3A. The common Gateway primers GW-attB1 and GW-attB2 were then added and the PCR continued for another 25 cycles to obtain the final, recombination-proficient DNA fragment, which constituted the predominant PCR product at this stage (Fig. 3B). For PA1520, the resulting 1,735 bp attB1-PA1520'-FRT-Gm-FRT-'PA1520-attB2 fragment was gel-purified and used for the BP clonase reaction for construction of an entry clone.
BP and LR clonase reactions
The BP and LR clonase reactions (Fig. 4) were performed according to Invitrogen's (Carlsbad, CA) Gateway cloning manual. For the BP clonase reaction pDONR221 was used, but only half of the recommended BP clonase enzyme mix. Gmr and kanamycin resistant (Kmr) DH5α or HPS1 transformants were selected and the presence of the correct plasmids was confirmed by Xba I digestion (the FRT sites flanking the Gmr gene each contain a single Xba I site). The insert of a correct pDONR-Gene::Gm entry clone was then recombined into the destination vector pEX18ApGW using the LR clonase protocol, again using only half of the recommended amount of LR clonase mix. Recombinants were transformed into DH5α and Apr colonies were selected. We noticed that, at least under the conditions we used, many transformants exhibited a Apr Kmr phenotype, indicating that they either contained both pDONR-Gene::Gm and pEX18ApGW-Gene::Gm or, more likely, a cointegrate of both plasmids. The presence of the correct pEX18ApGW-Gene::Gm in transformants that were only Apr was confirmed by Xba I digestion.
Figure 4
Gateway-recombinational cloning and return of the plasmid-borne deletion allele to theP. aeruginosachromosome. The mutant DNA fragment generated by overlap extension PCR is first cloned into pDONR221 via the BP clonase reaction to create the entry clone pDONR221-Gene::Gm, which then serves as the substrate for LR clonase-mediated recombination into the destination vector pEX18ApGW. The resulting suicide vector pEX18ApGW-Gene::Gm is then transferred to P. aeruginosa and the plasmid-borne deletion mutation is exchanged with the chromosome to generate the desired deletion mutant. Please note that, as discussed in the text, gene replacement by double-crossover can occur quite frequently, but it can also be a rare event in which case allele exchange happens in two steps involving homologous recombination. First, the suicide plasmid is integrated via a single-crossover event resulting in generation of a merodiploid containing the wild-type and mutant allele. Second, the merodiploid state is resolved by sacB-mediated sucrose counterselection in the presence of gentamycin, resulting in generation of the illustrated chromosomal deletion mutant. An unmarked mutant is then obtained after Flp recombinase-mediated excision of the Gm marker.
Gene replacement
To expedite gene replacement, an improved electroporation method [17] was used for transfer of the suicide plasmid pEX18ApGW-Gene::Gm into P. aeruginosa instead of the traditionally employed conjugation method. Although after transfer into P. aeruginosa double cross-over events can occur frequently (>50%), they can also be rare (<1–5%). In the latter instance, merodiploids formed via integration of the suicide plasmid by a single cross-over event (Fig. 4). The merodiploid state was then resolved via sucrose selection in the presence of gentamycin, resulting in deletion of the wild type gene. For generation of unmarked deletion mutants, the Gmr marker was subsequently removed by deletion of a 967 bp fragment using Flp recombinase. The presence of the desired deletion in either the marked or unmarked PA1520 mutant was verified by colony PCR utilizing the gene-specific up and down primers (Fig. 5).
Figure 5
PCR analysis of marked and unmarkedP. aeruginosaPA1520deletion strains. Colony PCR was performed on either wild-type PAO1 and its PA1520 mutant derivatives, either containing a marked (PA1520::FRT-Gm-FRT) or unmarked (PA1520::FRT) PA1520 deletion. The sizes of the expected PCR fragments are indicated. Note that the short deletion removes 41 bp of the PA1520 coding sequence, corresponding to codons 131 to 145, but replaces these sequences with a 85 bp FRT scar. Lane M contained Hi-Lo molecular size markers of the indicated sizes from Minnesota Molecular.
Deletion of 25 genes encoding transcriptional regulators of the GntR family
We are interested in characterizing the activator involved in regulation of expression of the fabAB operon, which encodes two essential enzymes of de novo fatty acid biosynthesis [18]. Expression of the fabAB operon is repressed by exogenously added fatty acids, most effectively by oleic acid, and preliminary results from our laboratory indicate that this may be due to relief of activation by a transcriptional regulator which binds to a 30 nucleotide site located in the fabAB promoter region (Choi and Schweizer, unpublished results). This 30 bp region is only found and conserved in Pseudomonas spp. Its deletion dramatically reduces transcription of the fabAB operon and the residual transcriptional activity is no longer fatty acid responsive (Fig. 6). In E. coli, transcriptional activation of the unlinked fabA and fabB genes is achieved by FadR, a regulator belonging to a group of transcriptional regulators with the GntR family signature [19, 20]. The PAO1 chromosome encodes more than 30 regulatory proteins with this signature. Of these, 27 have not been assigned function. Using the methodology described above for one of these genes, PA1520, we deleted 25 of the 27 genes (we could not delete the presumably essential PA1285 and PA2299) in less than 4 weeks in strain PAO1 with a chromosomally integrated fabA'-lacZ transcriptional fusion and analyzed β-galactosidase expression in the resulting mutant strains (Fig. 6). In exponential phase cells, the overall pattern of fabA expression was indistinguishable from the parental strain in all 25 mutants, indicating that none of these genes encodes the fabAB activator. We would have expected an expression pattern similar to that observed in the PAO1::fabA Δ30'-lacZ control strain which contains a deletion of the 30 nucleotide putative activator-binding site.
Figure 6
Effect of deletions ofP. aeruginosaGntR homologs onfabAexpression. The indicated genes were deleted in strain PAO1 containing a chromosomally integrated fabA'-lacZ fusion (labelled PAO1). The control was PAO1 with a fabA Δ30'-lacZ fusion; this strain harbours the same fabA'-lacZ fusion but contains a deletion of the putative 30 nucleotide activator-binding site in the fabA promoter region. Strains were grown to mid-log phase in LB medium containing 0.05% Brij 58 +/- 0.05% oleic acid and β-galactosidase expression was monitored in triplicate samples. The dotted line marks expression levels observed in the putative activator binding-site mutant and similar levels would be expected in an activator mutant.
Discussion
In our experience, the method described here for generation of unmarked deletion mutants is the fastest available to date. From start to finish, an individual unmarked P. aeruginosa mutant can be generated and characterized in ~14 days, which is up to one week faster than using our previously described method [9]. However, the main advantage of the method does not lie in individual mutant generation but in the speed by which collective deletion mutant pools can be generated. For example, we isolated unmarked deletions in 25 of the 27 genes encoding transcriptional regulators of the GntR family in less than 4 weeks. Two genes could not be deleted, presumably because they encode essential proteins. Besides speed, what are some of the other unique features of this method?
First, the deletion of gene sequences is not restricted by the natural availability or synthetic generation of restriction sites that are subsequently used to delete intervening sequences. With proper primer location, the PCR-based method allows clean deletion of more-or-less the entire coding sequence without fear of generating truncated genes which potentially produce products with undesired side effects.
Second, Flp excision of the antibiotic resistance gene cassette leaves behind a short 85 bp FRT scar which does not exhibit any known polar effects on downstream genes. The method is therefore uniquely suited to study genes organized in polycistronic units. Flp excision is a very straightforward procedure with efficiencies approaching 100% [9].
Third, the method is economical, especially in a more high-throughput format. PCR overlap extension requires only four gene specific primers of reasonable length which keeps oligonucleotide costs to a minimum. In comparison to traditional methods, it also requires fewer hands-on steps and gene-specific reagents (e.g., restriction enzymes).
Conclusion
Although not yet as fast as the PCR fragment-directed gene replacement method described for E. coli, the PCR- and recombinational cloning based method described opens the door for high-throughput generation of P. aeruginosa deletion mutants on a genome-wide scale. With appropriate modifications, i.e., choice of appropriate selection markers and Gateway-compatible gene replacement vectors, the method should be applicable to the many other bacteria in which the pEX vector system can be applied [6].
Methods
Media
Escherichia coli and P. aeruginosa strains were maintained on Luria-Bertani medium (LB; 10 g per liter tryptone, 5 g per liter yeast extract, 10 g per liter NaCl; Becton, Dickinson & Co., Sparks, MD). For plasmid maintenance in E. coli, the medium was supplemented with 100 μg per ml ampicillin, 25 μg per ml chloramphenicol, 35 μg per ml kanamycin or 15 μg per ml gentamycin. For marker selection in P. aeruginosa, 200 μg per ml carbenicillin and 30 μg per ml of gentamycin was used, as appropriate.
β-galactosidase activity assays
Cells were grown at 37°C with shaking to exponential phase (optical density at 540 nm ~0.4–0.8) in LB medium with 0.05% Brij 58 +/- 0.05% oleic acid. β-galactosidase activity was measured in chloroform/sodium dodecyl sulfate-permeabilized cells and its activity calculated as previously described [21].
Standard DNA procedures
Routine procedures were employed for manipulation of DNA [22]. Plasmid DNAs were isolated using the QIAprep Mini-spin kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and P. aeruginosa chromosomal DNA was obtained using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit. DNA fragments were purified from agarose gels utilizing the QIAquick gel extraction kit.
Construction of the Gateway-compatible gene replacement vector pEX18ApGW
The previously described gene replacement vector pEX18Ap [9] was modified by cloning of a 1,755 bp Hin dIII-Kpn I fragment from pUC18-mini-Tn7 T-Gm-GW (GenBank accession number AY737004), followed by transformation into the gyrA strain DB3.1 (Invitrogen).
1st round PCRs
PCR-amplification of the gentamycin resistance gene cassette
A 50 μl PCR reaction contained 5 ng pPS856 [9] template DNA, 1x HiFi Platinum Taq buffer, 2 mM MgSO4, 200 μM dNTPs, 0.2 μM of Gm-F and Gm-R (Table 1) and 5 units of HiFi Platinum Taq polymerase (Invitrogen). Cycle conditions were 95°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 1 min 30 s, and a final extension at 68°C for 7 min. The resulting 1,053 bp PCR product was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and its concentration determined spectrophotometrically (A260 nm) in an Eppendorf Biophotometer (Hamburg, Germany) and using the 50–2000 μl Eppendorf UVettes
PCR-amplification of 5' and 3' gene fragments
Two 50 μl PCR reactions were prepared. The first reaction contained 20 ng chromosomal template DNA, 1x HiFi Platinum Taq buffer, 2 mM MgSO4, 5% DMSO, 200 μM dNTPs, 0.8 μM of PA1520-UpF-GWL and PA1520-UpR-Gm (Table 1) and 5 units of Platinum Taq polymerase. The second reaction contained the same components as the first, but 0.8 μM of PA1520-DnF-Gm and PA1520-DnR-GWR (Table 1). Cycle conditions were 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 68°C for 10 min. The resulting PCR products were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and their concentrations determined spectrophotometrically (A260 nm).
2nd round PCR
A 50 μl PCR reaction contained 50 ng each of the PA1520 5' and 3' purified template DNAs, and 50 ng of FRT-Gm-FRT template DNA prepared during 1st round PCR. The reaction mix also contained 1x HiFi Platinum Taq buffer, 2 mM MgSO4, 5% DMSO and 200 μM dNTPs, and 5 units of HiFi Platinum Taq polymerase. After an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, 3 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 1 min were run without added primers. The third cycle was paused at 30 s of the 68°C extension, primers GW-attB1 and GW-attB2 were added to 0.2 μM each, and the cycle was then finished by another 30 s extension at 68°C. The PCR was completed by 25 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 5 min, and a final extension at 68°C for 10 min. The resulting major PCR product was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and its concentrations determined spectrophotometrically (A260 nm). The identity of the PCR fragment was confirmed by Xba I digestion (each FRT site of the FRT-Gm-FRT fragment contains a Xba I site).
BP and LR clonase reactions
The BP and LR clonase reactions for recombinational transfer of the PCR product into pDONR221 and pEX18ApGW, respectively, were performed as described in Invitrogen's Gateway cloning manual, but using only half of the recommended amounts of BP and LR clonase mixes and either E. coli DH5α [23] or HPS1 [24] as host strains. The presence of the correct fragments in transformants obtained with DNA from either clonase reaction was verified by digestion with Xba I because each FRT site flanking the Gmr gene contains a Xba I site. However, before plasmid isolation from transformants obtained with DNA from the LR clonase reaction, 25–50 transformants were i) patched on LB+Km and LB+Ap plates, and ii) simultaneously purified for single colonies on LB+Ap plates. This was necessary to distinguish between those colonies containing only the desired pEX18ApGW-Gene::Gm from those containing this plasmid and the frequently contaminating pDONR-Gene::Gm (pEX18Ap-derived plasmids confer Apr and pDONR plasmids confer Kmr). Plasmids were then isolated from Apr Kms transformants and analyzed by Xba I digestion. In those extremely rare instances where all patched transformants contained a mixed plasmid population (<1% of to date performed LR clonase reactions), retransformation with Apr selection was necessary to obtain colonies containing only pEX18ApGW-Gene::Gm.
Transfer of plasmid-borne deletions to the P. aeruginosa chromosome
A rapid electroporation method described elsewhere [17] was used to transfer the pEX18ApGW-borne deletion mutations to P. aeruginosa. Briefly, 6 ml of an overnight culture grown in LB medium was harvested in 4 microcentrifuge tubes by centrifugation (1–2 min, 16,000 × g) at room temperature. Each cell pellet was washed twice with 1 ml of room temperature 300 mM sucrose and they were then combined in a total of 100 μl 300 mM sucrose. For electroporation, 300-500 ng of plasmid DNA was mixed with 100 μl of electrocompetent cells and transferred to a 2 mm gap width electroporation cuvette. After applying a pulse (settings: 25 μF; 200 Ohm; 2.5 kV on a Bio-Rad GenePulserXcell™), 1 ml of LB medium was added at once, and the cells were transferred to a 17 × 100 mm glass or polystyrene tube and shaken for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were then harvested in a microcentrifuge tube. 800 μl of the supernatant was discarded and the cell pellet resuspended in the residual medium. The entire mixture was then plated on two LB plates containing 30 μg per ml Gm (LB+Gm30). The plates were incubated at 37°C until colonies appeared (usually within 24 h). Under these conditions, the transformation efficiencies were generally 30–100 transformants per μg of DNA. A few colonies were patched on LB+Gm30 plates and LB+Cb200 plates to differentiate single- from double cross-over events. To ascertain resolution of merodiploids, Gmr colonies were struck for single colonies on LB+Gm30 plates containing 5% sucrose. Gmr colonies from the LB-Gm-sucrose plates were patched onto LB+Gm30+5% sucrose, as well as LB plates with 200 μg per ml carbenicillin (LB+Cb200). Colonies growing on the LB-Gm-sucrose, but not on the LB-carbenicillin plates were considered putative deletion mutants. The presence of the correct mutations was verified by colony PCR. To do this, a single, large colony (or the equivalent from a cell patch) was picked from a LB-Gm-sucrose plate, transferred to 30 μl H2O in a microcentrifuge tube and boiled for 5 min. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation in a microcentrifuge fuge (2 min; 16,000 × g), and the supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube which was placed on ice. 5 μl of the supernatant was used as source of template DNA in a 50 μl PCR reaction containing Taq buffer, 1.5 mM MgSO4, 5% DMSO, 0.6 μM each of PA1520-UpF-GWL and PA1520-DnR-GWR, 200 μM dNTPs and 5 units Taq polymerase (Fermentas, Hanover, MD). Cycle conditions were 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 45 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Flp-mediated marker excision
Electrocompetent cells of the newly constructed mutant strain were prepared as described in the preceding paragraph and transformed with 20 ng of pFLP2 [9] DNA as described above. After phenotypic expression at 37°C for 1 h, the cell suspension was diluted 1:1,000 and 1:10,000 with either LB or 0.9% NaCl, and 50 μl aliquots were plated on LB+Cb200 plates and incubated at 37°C until colonies appeared. Transformants were purified for single colonies on LB+Cb200 plates. Ten single colonies were tested for antibiotic-susceptibility on LB ± Gm30 plates and on a LB+Cb200 plate. Two Gms Cbr isolates were struck for single colonies onto a LB+5% sucrose plate and incubated at 37°C until sucrose-resistant colonies appeared. Ten sucrose-resistant colonies were retested on a LB+5% sucrose (master) plate and a LB+Cb200 plate. Finally, two sucrose-resistant and Cbs colonies were struck on LB plates without antibiotics, and their Cbs and Gms phenotypes confirmed by patching on LB ± Cb200 and LB ± Gm30 plates. Deletion of the Gmr marker was assessed by colony PCR utilizing the conditions and primers described in the preceding paragraph
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH grant AI058141 to HPS. The authors wish to thank Dr. Donald Moir (Microbiotix, Inc.) for helpful advice regarding use of the PCR overlap extension technology with GC-rich DNA.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University
References
Stover CK, Pham XQ, Erwin AL, Mizoguchi SD, Warrener P, Hickey MJ, Brinkman FSL, Hufnagle WO, Kowalik DJ, Lagrou M, Garber RL, Goltry L, Tolentino E, Westbrock-Wadman S, Yuan Y, Brody LL, Coulter SN, Folger KR, Kas A, Larbig K, Lim R, Spencer D, Wong GKS, Wu Z, Paulsen IT, Reizer J, M.H. Saier, R.E.W. Hancock, Lory S, Olson MV: Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature. 2000, 406: 959-964. 10.1038/35023079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Goodman AL, Lory S: Analysis of regulatory networks in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by genomewide transcriptional profiling. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004, 7: 39-44. 10.1016/j.mib.2003.12.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
LaBaer J, Qiu Q, Anumanthan A, Mar W, Zuo D, Murthy TVS, Taycher H, Halleck A, Hainsworth E, Lory S, Brizuela L: The Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 gene collection. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 2190-2200. 10.1101/gr.2482804.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Jacobs MA, Alwood A, Thaipisuttikul I, Spencer DH, Haugen E, Ernst S, Will O, Kaul R, Raymond CK, Levy R, Chun-Rong L, Guenthner D, Bovee D, Olson MV, Manoil C: Comprehensive transposon mutant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PNAS. 2003, 100: 14339-14344. 10.1073/pnas.2036282100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Suh SJ, Silo-Suh LA, Ohman DE: Development of tools for the genetic manipulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Microbiol Methods. 2004, 58: 203-212. 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.03.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Schweizer HP, de Lorenzo V: Molecular tools for genetic analysis of pseudomonads. The Pseudomonads - Genomics, life style and molecular architecture. Edited by: Ramos JL. 2004, New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, I: 317-350.Google Scholar
Schweizer HP: Allelic exchange in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using novel ColE1-type vectors and a family of cassettes containing a portable oriT and the counter-selectable Bacillus subtilis sacB marker. Mol Microbiol. 1992, 6: 1195-1204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Stibitz S: Use of conditionally counterselectable suicide vectors for allelic exchange. Methods Enzymol. 1994, 235: 458-465.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hoang TT, Karkhoff-Schweizer RR, Kutchma AJ, Schweizer HP: A broad-host-range Flp-FRT recombination system for site-specific excision of chromosomally-located DNA sequences: application for isolation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants. Gene. 1998, 212: 77-86. 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00130-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Quenee L, Lamotte D, Polack B: Combined sacB-based negative selection and cre-lox antibiotic marker recycling for efficient gene deletion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biotechniques. 2005, 38: 63-67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Datsenko KA, Wanner BL: One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 6640-6645. 10.1073/pnas.120163297.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gust B, Challis GL, Fowler K, Kieser T, Chater KF: PCR-targeted Streptomyces gene replacement identifies a protein domain needed for biosynthesis of the sesquiterpene soil oder geosmin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 1541-1546. 10.1073/pnas.0337542100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Chuanchuen R, Murata T, Gotoh N, Schweizer HP: Substrate-dependent utilization of OprM or OpmH by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexJK efflux pump. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005, 49: 2133-2136. 10.1128/AAC.49.5.2133-2136.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Horton RM, Cai ZL, Ho SN, Pease LR: Gene splicing by overlap extension: tailor-made genes using the polymerase chain reaction. Biotechniques. 1990, 8: 528-535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wolfgang MC, Lee VT, Gilmore ME, Lory S: Coordinate regulation of bacterial virulence genes by a novel adenylate cyclase-dependent signaling pathway. Dev Cell. 2003, 4: 253-263. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00019-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Choi KH, Kumar A, Schweizer HP: A 10 min method for preparation of highly electrocompetent Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells: application for DNA fragment transfer between chromosomes and plasmid transformation. J Microbiol Methods.Google Scholar
Hoang TT, Schweizer HP: Fatty acid biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: cloning and characterization of the fabAB operon encoding b-hydroxydecanoyl-acyl carrier protein dehydratase (FabA) and b-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase I (FabB). J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 5326-5332.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
van Aalten DMF, DiRusso CC, Knudsen J, Wierenga RK: Crystal structure of FadR, a fatty acid-responsive transcription factor with a novel acyl coenzyme A-binding fold. EMBO J. 2000, 19: 5167-5177. 10.1093/emboj/19.19.5167.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
van Aalten DMF, DiRusso CC, Knudsen J: The structural basis of acyl coenzyme A-dependent regulation of the transcription factor FadR. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 2041-2050. 10.1093/emboj/20.8.2041.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Miller JH: A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics. 1992, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular Cloning. 2001, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, ThirdGoogle Scholar
Schweizer HP: A method for construction of bacterial hosts for lac-based cloning and expression vectors: a complementation and regulated expression. BioTechniques. 1994, 17: 452-456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bernard P, Gabant P, Bahassi EM, Couturier M: Positive selection vectors using the F plasmid ccdB killer gene. Gene. 1994, 148: 71-74. 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90235-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
