Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Microbiology

Open Access

In vivo studies of genomic packaging in the dsRNA bacteriophage Φ8

BMC Microbiology20055:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-5-10

Received: 12 January 2005

Accepted: 11 March 2005

Published: 11 March 2005

Abstract

Background

Φ8 is a bacteriophage containing a genome of three segments of double-stranded RNA inside a polyhedral capsid enveloped in a lipid-containing membrane. Plus strand RNA binds and is packaged by empty procapsids. Whereas Φ6, another member of the Cystoviridae, shows high stringency, serial dependence and precision in its genomic packaging in vitro and in vivo, Φ8 packaging is more flexible. Unique sequences (pac) near the 5' ends of plus strands are necessary and sufficient for Φ6 genomic packaging and the RNA binding sites are located on P1, the major structural protein of the procapsid.

Results

In this paper the boundaries of the Φ8 pac sequences have been explored by testing the in vivo packaging efficacy of transcripts containing deletions or changes in the RNA sequences. The pac sequences have been localized to the 5' untranslated regions of the viral transcripts. Major changes in the pac sequences are either tolerated or ameliorated by suppressor mutations in the RNA sequence. Changes in the genomic packaging program can be established as a result of mutations in P1, the major structural protein of the procapsid and the determinant of RNA binding specificity.

Conclusion

Although Φ8 is distantly related to bacteriophage Φ6, and does not show sequence similarity, it has a similar genomic packaging program. This program, however, is less stringent than that of Φ6.

Background

The Cystoviridae are a family of bacteriophages having genomes consisting of three segments of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). The RNA is contained within a polyhedral capsid which is enveloped in a lipid-containing membrane [1]. Φ6 was the first and the most thoroughly studied member of this family. The packaging of the Φ6 genome was found to progress through a program that involves the sequential packaging of the plus strands of segments S, M and L in that order [2]. This program is rather stringent for Φ6 in that segment S can be packaged alone while M requires prior packaging of S and L requires prior packaging of M. Segment L can be packaged to some extent with only prior packaging of S but this is much less efficient than the normal packaging [3, 4]. The Cystoviridae are the only family of RNA viruses that are reliably known to package their genomic segments into preformed capsids. Although the Reoviridae have an inner core particle structure strikingly similar to that of the Cystoviridae, their mechanisms of genomic packaging have not yet been determined [5]. Packaging in the Cystoviridae is driven by an NTPase motor comprised of a hexamer of protein P4 [68]. The plus strands of Φ6 have an 18 base consensus sequence at the 5' end and at about 50 bases downstream, a sequence of about 200 nucleotides that is necessary and sufficient for packaging into procapsids. The 200 nucleotide sequence is called pac and it is unique for each segment, with very limited identity in sequence between the three segments. Minus strand synthesis begins after the completion of the plus strand packaging and plus strand synthesis begins after minus strand synthesis is completed. A model has been proposed that involves the programmed changes in the binding sites for plus strands on the surface of the procapsid as a function of the amount of RNA in the particle [2].

The pac sequences of Φ6 were defined by deletion analysis of the plus strand transcripts of plasmids carrying cDNA copies of the genomic segments. In vitro packaging was used to assess the success of packaging of transcripts harboring a series of deletions. It was found that the pac sequences ended about 50 nucleotides before the first open reading frames (orfs) of the segments [9]. The pac sequences showed considerable secondary structure, with a number of stem-loops [10]. Comparison of the pac sequences of close relatives of Φ6 suggested that the stem-loop structures were important because base changes preserved the stems in a number of cases [2]. Φ8 is the most distantly related member of the Cystoviridae relative to Φ6. It has no sequence identity or similarity to Φ6 and it has significant differences in genetic and physical structure [11, 12]. Our aim was to determine whether Φ8 genomic packaging uses pac sequences in a manner similar to that found for Φ6. Whereas the pac sequences were defined in Φ6 by in vitro packaging studies, we have found that in vitro packaging for Φ8 is non-specific when evaluated by the uptake of radioactive RNA [12]. We have therefore used in vivo transcript acquisition to define the pac sequences of Φ8 in this report.

Results

The determination of the pac sequences of Φ8

The pac sequences of Φ6 were determined by deletion analysis [9]. Plus strand transcripts of cDNA plasmids were prepared with deletions near the 5' ends of particular genomic segments. These RNA molecules were incubated with procapsids and the two other wild type transcripts. Minus strand synthesis was then used as the measure of packaging efficiency, since minus strand synthesis was found to be dependent upon packaging of the three genomic segments. It was found that the pac sequences ended about 50 nucleotides before the first open reading frames (orfs). These orf positions were at nucleotides 305, 367 and 270 for segments S, M and L respectively. In the case of Φ8 the first reading frames in segments S, M and L begin at nucleotides 188, 263 and 253 respectively [11](Fig. 1). This would put the ends of the pac sequences at about 140, 210 and 200 for S, M and L if the same relationship to orf s is operating in Φ8 as in Φ6. We have done deletion analysis on segments S, M and L and measured the efficacy of plasmid transcript acquisition into infectious phage as a measure of packaging success. Plasmid transcript acquisition is effected by the introduction of non replicating cDNA plasmids into cells by electroporation. The transcripts of the plasmids produce live phage if they are packaged and if they contain all of the necessary genes. If a particular transcript lacks a functional pac sequence, it will not be packaged and live phage will not be produced. With normal wild type transcripts one finds thousands of infectious centers produced. We found that the pac sequences are located in the 5' untranslated region of the plus strands but that they are closer to the first orfs than found for Φ6. Whereas many of the small changes in the pac sequences of Φ6 resulted in diminutions of the order of one hundred fold in acquisition frequency [13], changes of this type in Φ8 generally led to changes of less than ten fold (Table 3).
Table 3

Plasmids used in this study with cDNA copies of Φ8S

Plasmid

changes

oligo

plaques

suppressors

2755

wt

 

600

 

2816

Δ137–158

590

>1000

 

2817

Δ120–158

591

1

 

2819

Δ101–158

592

1

 

2820

Δ75–158

593

2

 

2914

UAG135CUU

681

400

no

2916

AG83UU

683

1000 small

no

2918

UUCG41Δ

685

200

no

2920

UUCG41CCCA

687

300

no

2929

UU128CA

693

>1000

 

2938

A166C

699

251 small

no +A172C* or U161A

2939

UAAA163CCCC

701

207

no + C167U

2955

GG159AU

708

60

no + U135C

    

U133A

    

G175A

2956

GG159AU

708

>1000

no +A166Δ

 

A170 Δ

   

2979

GG159AU

708

24

no + C132A

 

A166C

714

  

2980

GG159AU

708

6

no + C132U

 

A166C

714

  

2990

GG159AU

708

>1000

 
 

A166C

714

  
 

C132U

722

  

2997

GG159AU

708

10 small

 
 

Δ137–158

728

  
 

A166C

714

  

2996

GG159AU

724

700 small

 
 

Δ137–158

728

  

3000

C132U

722

>1000

 

2999

C132U

722

0

 
 

Δ135–143

   

3013

GAG138CUC

742

3

no or G111A or U114C

3015

GAG138Δ

744

>1000

 

3016

    

2940

C199A

703

>1000

 

* suppressor containing plaques were larger than the others

Figure 1

cDNA map of the genomic segments of bacteriophage Φ8. An SP6 promoter precedes the cDNA copies in the plasmids.

Segment L

A deletion of nucleotides 244 to 328 in L does not interfere with packaging (Table 1, plasmid 3316). Although this deletion involves gene 14, the gene product is not required for plaque formation. Deletions starting at nucleotide 219 or earlier compromise packaging severely or completely (Table 1). Deletions from 329 to 745 are also tolerated if gene Hb is complemented in trans (not shown). The downstream end of the pac sequence is consequently located in the region between nucleotides 219 and 244 and therefore between 9 and 34 bases upstream of the gene 14 orf.
Table 1

Plasmids used in this study with cDNA copies of Φ8L

Plasmid

Changes

Oligo

Plaques

2653

wt

 

>1000

3316

Δ244–328

897

>1000

3172

Δ219–328

801

40

3322

Δ210–328

898

4

3318

Δ185–328

899

0

3320

Δ170–328

900

0

2835/6

Δ135–333

 

0

Segment M

A deletion of 196 to 215 in M compromises segment acquisition; and deletion of the BamHI site at 215 compromises acquisition (Table 2, plasmid 3324). Creation of a HindIII site at position 238 does not reduce acquisition (Table 2, plasmid 3348), but deletion of this site does (Table 2, plasmid 3356). A deletion of bases 34 to 39 also compromises viability in M (Table 2, plasmid 3043). Therefore the downstream end of the pac sequence of M is located in the region of nucleotide 242 which places it either inside of gene 10 or close to it.
Table 2

Plasmids used in this study with cDNA copies of Φ8M

Plasmid

Change

Oligo

Plaques

2669

wt

 

>1000

3324

Δ216–219

 

0

2833

Δ196–215

 

2

3348

CCA240GC

925

>1000

3356

Δ238–244

925

0

3043

Δ34–39

750

10 turbid

Segment S

In the case of segment S we find that a deletion of nucleotides from 137 to 158 has little effect on the formation of viable phage (Table 3, plasmid 2816). The deletion of 137 to 158 is interesting in that the stem at F (Fig. 2) is recreated and the loop, nucleotides 160 to 166, is maintained in the deletion structure (Fig. 3). Base changes and deletions in the loops of B, C, D and E do not show great diminution of packaging. Larger deletions such as 75 to 158 (Table 3, plasmid 2820) or 120 to 158 (Table 3, plasmid 2817) completely abolished plaque formation. This would place the pac region somewhere between nucleotides 40 and 139, which would make the pac region in Φ8 S about half the size of the corresponding region in Φ6. But an examination of the consequences of base changes in the exterior of this region suggests a somewhat more complicated picture. The region between nucleotides 120 and 139 is very important; but changes in the region from 160 to 170 also are significant, suggesting that the pac region extends from about 40 to 170. Although loop F at position 160 to 166 is maintained in the deletion of 137 to 158, the sequence of the loop can be changed (Table 3, plasmid 2939) without compromising packaging. However changing bases 159 and 160 (Table 3, plasmid 2955) prevents packaging. This suggests that the stem or the stem-loop junction may be more important than the loop. There is a stem loop structure from 125 to 147 with the loop UAG at 135 (Fig. 2). Changing the UAG to CUU has little effect (Table 3, plasmid 2914). There are two U's that are unpaired in the stem and changing them so that they pair results in no change in packaging. But other changes in the stem result in poor packaging. It appears that the stems are more sensitive than the loops in the pac region in terms of interference with packaging. The downstream end of the pac sequence is again very close to, or even within, the first orf, which in this case is gene 8 (Fig. 1).
Figure 2

mfold 15 of the 5' region of wild type segment S plus strand. The maximum distance between paired bases is set at 50.

Figure 3

mfold 15 of the 5' region of the segment S plus strand with a deletion of bases 137 to 158 (Table 3, plasmid 2816). The bases are numbered as in the undeleted wild type segment S of Fig.2

The consequences of replacing the pac sequence of M with that of L

Base changes within the pac regions of the Φ6 genome have resulted in the isolation of suppressor mutations in protein P1, the major structural protein of the procapsid and the determinant of the RNA binding sites. However, in the case of Φ8 we have found less stringency in the pac sequences and we have not found suppressor mutations in P1. In the case of Φ6 it was found that suppressor mutations in P1 could also be isolated when conditions were established that were contrary to the packaging program [14]. Packaging of segments M and L without segment S could be established in carrier states if suppressor mutations were promoted in gene 1 [14]. We had previously found that gene 8 was indispensable in Φ8, thereby making it difficult to establish carrier states in the absence of segment S. We therefore set out to select for a condition where the M segment would have the pac sequence of L and that phage would be selected for with both the M and L segments having the same pac sequences.

We therefore set out to construct a plasmid with a cDNA copy of segment M but with the pac sequence of segment L. A plasmid was prepared with the cDNA copy of segment M. It was cut with BglII and XhoI which removed the first 191 nucleotides and replaced with BglII/SmaI fragment of a plasmid with a cDNA copy of L. This places the first 371 nucleotides of L at the 5' end of segment M. This plasmid is called pLM3018. Electroporation of this plasmid along with plasmids containing normal copies of L and S into cells carrying plasmids expressing SP6 RNA polymerase resulted in only one plaque as opposed to tens of thousands with normal wild type constructs (Table 4). The RNA of the resulting viable phage was analyzed and it was found that the pac sequence of L remained on segment M. Gene 1 on segment L was cloned as cDNA and inserted into a copy of normal segment L. The electroporation experiment was repeated with the original plasmids or with the normal S, the M segment with the L pac sequence and the new L plasmid containing the replacement of wild type gene 1 with that of the presumed mutant gene 1. The original combination gave no plaques, while the combination with the new gene 1 gave thousands of plaques as did the new L plasmid with normal M and S (Table 4). The yield from the latter test was ten times that of the electroporation with the chimeric M. Sequencing of gene 1 showed that a single change at U4807C had occurred. Reisolation of the small fragment between sites at 4030 and 4850 confirmed that this mutation was responsible for the ability to package the chimeric M. The amino acid change generated in protein P1 by the mutation is V242A. In Φ6, all suppressor mutations involved in packaging have been in protein P1, which is the major structural protein of the procapsid and the source of the specific binding sites for the plus strands of the genomic segments.
Table 4

Production of phage by electroporation of cDNA plasmids with pac sequence of L in segment M

Comment

M+Mpac

M+Lpac

L wt

L mut

S

Plaques

Normal

+

 

+

 

+

>1000

M has Lpac

 

+

+

 

+

1 or 0

Mutant L and M having Lpac

 

+

 

+

+

>1000

Mutant L and Normal M

+

  

+

+

>1000

Discussion

Plus strands of the three genomic segments of bacteriophage Φ6 are packaged by core structures composed of proteins P1, P2, P4 and P7 [2]. They bind to protein P1, the major structural protein of the core and are translocated to the interior by hexamers of the NTPase P4. We had worked out the identification of sequences necessary and sufficient for packaging in bacteriophage Φ6 by in vitro packaging experiments. A region near the 5' end designated as pac is necessary and sufficient for packaging. We have established that the pac sequences of Φ6 are located in the 5' untranslated regions of the plus strands. Whereas the in vitro packaging of Φ6 is very stringent and specific, that of Φ8 was found to be non-specific when uptake of radioactive RNA was being assayed. In vivo packaging was more specific [12]. We therefore established a system of in vivo transcript acquisition to test the sequence limits for the packaging of the Φ8 genome.

In this report, we have identified the pac regions for bacteriophage Φ8, a distant relative of Φ6. All three plus strands of Φ8 have a consensus sequence of 9 nucleotides at the 5' end. Again, we have found that the pac regions occupy space in the 5' untranslated regions of the plus strands. Although the pac regions of both Φ6 and Φ8 have many stem-loop structures, there is no sequence or structural similarity between the two sets. There is also no sequence similarity between the pac sequences of the three genomic segments of Φ8. While the Φ6 pac sequences extend approximately to nucleotides 230, 305 and 270 for L, M and S respectively; those of Φ8 extend to near nucleotides 244, 242 and 170. The Φ8 pac sequences end closer to the first orfs than those of Φ6. In the cases of segments S and M the pac sequences might overlap the first orfs. Changes within the pac region of Φ8 segment S are less destructive of packaging than similar changes in pac regions of Φ6. Many changes are tolerated, and in some cases the effects of changes are suppressed by other changes in the pac sequences. In some cases it is possible to rationalize the suppression in terms of the structure shown by mfold [15]; in other cases it is not clear why the suppression is effective. In Φ6, we found little suppression due to changes in the pac sequences but we found suppressors by mutation in the sequence of P1, the major structural protein of the core. Genomic RNA that is bound to procapsids can be cross-linked to protein P1 [16]. So far, we have not found suppressors of this type in Φ8 for changes in the pac sequences. However, we did obtain a suppressor mutation for another type of packaging program transgression. We found that we could exchange the pac sequence of L with that of M. The L segment could be packaged in this case if an amino acid change was present in P1.

The experiments involving manipulation of the pac sequence of segment S indicate that the Φ8 packaging mechanism has a lower level of stringency than that of Φ6 [13]. Is there a benefit of low stringency in packaging for a viral system? It appears that the answer is yes in many cases. Many bacteriophages with DNA genomes are able to package host or plasmid DNA and consequently carry out transduction of host genes [17]. Low stringency offers the possiblility of the acquisition of host RNA transcripts by RNA viruses. We have seen that Φ6 can acquire plasmid transcripts that do not have pac sequences, albeit at extremely low frequencies [18]. It also allows the acquisition of genomic segments of distantly related phages. Although Φ6 cannot acquire the genomic segments of Φ13 a related cystovirus, Φ13 can acquire the S and M segments of Φ6 [19]. Influenza virus is now believed to have specific packaging of its genomic segments [20]. However the packaging is of low enough stringency that virions can acquire genomic segments from viruses that infect very different host organisms [21].

Conclusion

The sequences that are necessary for packaging transcripts of the dsRNA genome of bacteriophage Φ8 are located in the 5' untranslated regions of the three genomic segments. Genomic packaging in Φ8 is much less stringent than that found for the distantly related bacteriophage Φ6. Many changes in the pac region of S are tolerated while others are suppressed by compensating changes in the RNA sequence. Changes in the packaging program can be produced by mutations that change the amino acid sequence of P1, the major structural protein of the procapsid.

Methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids

Pseudomonas syringae HB10Y derivative LM2489 was the host for Φ8 [1, 19]. Escherichia coli strain JM109 (recA1, endA1, gyrA96, thi, hsdR17, supE44, relA1, λ-, Δ(lac-proAB)), [F', traD36, proAB, lacIq, ΔM15] [22] was used for the propagation of all plasmids. Epicurian Super Competent cells of E. coli (Stratagene) were used for transformation after directed mutagenesis. Plasmids utilized in this study are listed in tables 1, 2 and 3. All cDNA plasmids used in this study have a SP6 promoter upstream of the cDNA sequences. The SP6 promoter is preceded by a BglII site. The sequences of the Φ8 genomic segments are in GenBank with accession numbers NC_003299, NC_003300 and NC_003299 for L, M and S respectively.

Reverse genetics for the modification of the viral genome

The simplest means of virus construction is to electroporate host cells with SP6 promoter plasmids that contain cDNA copies of the genomic segments along with a plasmid that codes for SP6 RNA polymerase. We generally add about 200 ng of each cDNA plasmid to about 2 × 109 cells. Using colE1 based plasmids such as pT7T319U, that transcribe but do not replicate in pseudomonads we can produce hundreds of plaques. If the polymerase plasmid is resident in the host strain, we can produce tens of thousands of infectious centers with wild type constructions. Plasmid pLM2790 is a derivative of shuttle vector pLM254 with SP6 polymerase gene of PSR3 [23] cloned into the BamH1 site [24]. In cases where we alter the pac sequences, the number of plaques can be reduced drastically. In some cases, the resulting phage contain suppressor mutations or reversions of the directed mutations. Although the 5' sequence of the Φ8 plus strands, GAAA, is more compatible with the specificity of SP6 polymerase, it is possible to use T7 RNA polymerase as well, although with somewhat lower efficacy.

If one of the genomic segments has a gene for kanamycin resistance, kan, inserted into either its non coding region or replacing one or more genes, then electroporation can result in the establishment of a carrier state in which the viral genome is replicated in cells without lysis and with the expression of the drug resistance so as to form stable drug resistant colonies [14].

Production of deletions in the pac sequences of the Φ8 segments

In some cases, deletions could be made by simply ligating the products of restriction enzyme cuts at unique sites. In other cases, we used oligos that contained a Pmel site that occurs uniquely in S at 160 and a jump to a vector sequence to PCR on cDNA copies of segment S. These pieces were ligated to Pmel and EcoRI in the vector to form the deletions. To make smaller deletions or base changes we used the Quick Change protocol of Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) with oligos listed in Table 5 along with their complements, which involves PCR on a plasmid template and subsequent treatment with DpnI to eliminate the template DNA. Changes in segment L usually involved PCR with linkage to the NsiI site at position 328. Changes in segment M involved deletions at restriction sites.
Table 5

oligonucleotides used for mutagenesis of pac sequences

Oligonucleotide

Sequence

590

TCTCAGTTTAAACCTAGAGACAAAGCTGAC

591

TCTCAGTTTAAACCGAGATCCCAGGAAATG

592

TCTCAGTTTAAACCACGAATCACCCCGAGC

593

TCTCAGTTTAAACCTTCGCGCCTTTCAGGG

681

GAGTCAGCTTTGTCTCCTTGAGACTGAGCGTTCGG

683

GGCGCGAAGGTCCCCACCTTCTCGGGGTGATTCGT

685

TTCGCTGGCATAGCTCGAGTGAAGCCTTCCCTG

687

CGCTGGCATAGCTCCCCAGAGTGAAGCCTTCCCTG

693

GATCTCGGAGTCAGCTCAGTCTCTAGGAGACTG

699

GTTCGGTCTCAGGTTTAACCTGAGATTGAG

701

GTTCGGTCTCAGGTTCCCCCTGAGATTGAG

703

GACAATGGGTAGAATATTTCAACTGTTGATGC

708

GTTCGGTCTCAATTTTAAACTGAGATTGAG

714

GTTCGGTCTCAATTTTAACCTGAGATTGAG

722

GTCAGCTTTGTTTCTAGGAGACTGAGCGTTCGG

724

CTTTGTCTCTAATTTTAAACTGAGATTGAG

742

CAGCTTTGTCTCTAGCTCACTGAGCGTTCGGTC

744

CAGCTTTGTCTCTAGACTGAGCGTTCGGTC

750

CGGCAATAAGGGTGGCAAAGAGGGTCGAGC

801

CCCATGCATGATCGCGATGAACGCGAAATGAAAC

897

CCCATGCATAACTCCTATTATTAACTATTAATTG

898

CCCATGCATGAACGCGAAATGAAACTTATCTAATCAC

899

CCCATGCATCACTTGTTATGTGATCAGCTTTTGAGTG

900

CCCATGCATCAGCTTTTGAGTGAAGTGGAAACGGG

925

TAGCTACTAGACAGAAAGCTTCCTAACAAGGAGATGCAC

The placing of the pac sequence of L on segment M

The BglII/XhoI fragment of plasmid pLM2669 contains the pac sequence of Φ8M as well as the SP6 promoter. This fragment was exchanged with the BglII/SmaI fragment of plasmid pLM2653 which carries the cDNA copy of Φ8L (Fig. 1).

RTPCR

dsRNA was isolated from crude cell lysates by first treating with DNase, then phenol extraction and electroelution of the RNA from agarose gels. The RNA was then denatured and annealed to primer and incubated with AMV reverse transcriptase. The products were then subjected to PCR with Pfu turbo DNA polymerase (Stratagene) [19]. The resulting DNA products were cloned into pT7T319U and sequenced at the Molecular Resources Facility of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey.

Mfolds of segment S pac sequences

The secondary structures of the pac sequences were determined on the mfold web server using the mfold 3.1 program of Zuker and Turner [15]. The folds were constrained so that the maximum distance between paired bases was 50. The mfold structural predictions for the Φ6 pac sequences were previously found to be similar to those found by nuclease sensitivity [10]. The structures shown in Figures 2 and 3 are not unique in that there are several structures with similar free energy values. However, stem-loop F in Figure 2 is present in all of them.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant GM34352 from the National Institutes of Health. Plasmid PSR3 was a gift of Dr. William McAllister.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology, The Public Health Research Institute

References

  1. Vidaver AK, Koski RK, Van Etten JL: Bacteriophage Φ6 : a lipid-containing virus of Pseudomonas phaseolicola. J Virol. 1973, 11: 799-805.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mindich L: Precise packaging of the three genomic segments of the double-stranded-RNA bacteriophage Φ6. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999, 63: 149-160.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Qiao X, Qiao J, Mindich L: Stoichiometric packaging of the three genomic segments of dsRNA bacteriophage Φ6. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 4074-4079. 10.1073/pnas.94.8.4074.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Qiao X, Casini G, Qiao J, Mindich L: In vitro packaging of individual genomic segments of bacteriophage Φ6 RNA: serial dependence relationships. J Virol. 1995, 69: 2926-2931.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Reinisch KM, Nibert ML, Harrison SC: Structure of the reovirus core at 3.6 A resolution. Nature. 2000, 404: 960-967. 10.1038/35010041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gottlieb P, Strassman J, Mindich L: Protein P4 of the bacteriophage Φ6 procapsid has a nucleoside triphosphate-binding site with associated nucleoside triphosphate phosphohydrolase activity. J Virol. 1992, 66: 6220-6222.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Juuti JT, Bamford DH, Tuma R, Jr. GJT: Structure and NTPase activity of the RNA-translocating protein (P4) of bacteriophage Φ6. J Mol Biol. 1998, 279: 347-359. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1772.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mancini EJ, Kainov DE, Grimes JM, Tuma R, Bamford DH, Stuart DI: Atomic Snapshots of an RNA Packaging Motor Reveal Conformational Changes Linking ATP Hydrolysis to RNA Translocation. Cell. 2004, 118: 743-755. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gottlieb P, Qiao X, Strassman J, Frilander M, Mindich L: Identification of the packaging regions within the genomic RNA segments of bacteriophage Φ6. Virology. 1994, 200: 42-47. 10.1006/viro.1994.1160.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pirttimaa MJ, Bamford DH: RNA secondary structures of the bacteriophage phi6 packaging regions. RNA. 2000, 6: 880-889. 10.1017/S1355838200992598.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoogstraten D, Qioa X, Sun Y, Hu A, Onodera S, Mindich L: Characterization of Φ8, a bacteriophage containing three double-stranded RNA genomic segments and distantly related to Φ6. Virology. 2000, 272: 218-224. 10.1006/viro.2000.0374.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sun Y, Qiao X, Qiao J, Onodera S, Mindich L: Unique properties of the inner core of bacteriophage phi8, a virus with a segmented dsRNA genome. Virology. 2003, 308: 354-361. 10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00013-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Qiao J, Qiao X, Sun Y, Mindich L: Isolation and analysis of mutants with altered packaging specificity in the dsRNA bacteriophage Φ6. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 4572-4577. 10.1128/JB.185.15.4572-4577.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sun Y, Qiao X, Mindich L: Construction of carrier state viruses with partial genomes of the segmented dsRNA bacteriophages. Virology. 2004, 319: 274-279. 10.1016/j.virol.2003.10.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zuker M: Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3406-3415. 10.1093/nar/gkg595.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Qiao X, Qiao J, Mindich L: Analysis of the specific binding involved in genomic packaging of the dsRNA bacteriophage Φ6. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 6409-6414. 10.1128/JB.185.21.6409-6414.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mann BA, Slauch JM: Transduction of low-copy number plasmids by bacteriophage P22. Genetics. 1997, 146: 447-456.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Onodera S, Sun Y, Mindich L: Reverse genetics and recombination in Φ8, a dsRNA bacteriophage. Virology. 2001, 286: 113-118. 10.1006/viro.2001.0995.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mindich L, Qiao X, Qiao J, Onodera S, Romantschuk M, Hoogstraten D: Isolation of additional bacteriophages with genomes of segmented double-stranded RNA. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 4505-4508.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fujii Y, Goto H, Watanabe T, Yoshida T, Kawaoka Y: Selective incorporation of influenza virus RNA segments into virions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100: 2002-2007. 10.1073/pnas.0437772100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Reid AH, Taubenberger JK, Fanning TG: Evidence of an absence: the genetic origins of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004, 2: 909-914. 10.1038/nrmicro1027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J: Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985, 33: 103-119. 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90120-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jorgensen ED, Durbin RK, Risman SS, McAllister WT: Specific contacts between the bacteriophage T3, T7, and SP6 RNA polymerases and their promoters. J Biol Chem. 1991, 266: 645-651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mindich L, MacKenzie G, Strassman J, McGraw T, Metzger S, Romantschuk M, Bamford D: cDNA cloning of portions of the bacteriophage Φ6 genome. J Bacteriol. 1985, 162: 992-999.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Qiao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement