- Research article
- Open Access
The antimicrobial lysine-peptoid hybrid LP5 inhibits DNA replication and induces the SOS response in Staphylococcus aureus
© Gottschalk et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 30 May 2013
- Accepted: 13 August 2013
- Published: 14 August 2013
The increase in antibiotic resistant bacteria has led to renewed interest in development of alternative antimicrobial compounds such as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), either naturally-occurring or synthetically-derived. Knowledge of the mode of action (MOA) of synthetic compounds mimicking the function of AMPs is highly valuable both when developing new types of antimicrobials and when predicting resistance development. Despite many functional studies of AMPs, only a few of the synthetic peptides have been studied in detail.
We investigated the MOA of the lysine-peptoid hybrid, LP5, which previously has been shown to display antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. At concentrations of LP5 above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), the peptoid caused ATP leakage from bacterial cells. However, at concentrations close to the MIC, LP5 inhibited the growth of S. aureus without ATP leakage. Instead, LP5 bound DNA and inhibited macromolecular synthesis. The binding to DNA also led to inhibition of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV and caused induction of the SOS response.
Our data demonstrate that LP5 may have a dual mode of action against S. aureus. At MIC concentrations, LP5 binds DNA and inhibits macromolecular synthesis and growth, whereas at concentrations above the MIC, LP5 targets the bacterial membrane leading to disruption of the membrane. These results add new information about the MOA of a new synthetic AMP and aid in the future design of synthetic peptides with increased therapeutic potential.
- Minimal Inhibitory Concentration
- Replication Fork
- Macromolecular Synthesis
- Agar Diffusion Assay
Growing concern over the increase in multidrug resistant bacteria has urged the interest for development of new types and classes of antimicrobial compounds. One such class is antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), also known as host defence peptides, that are found in all multicellular organisms and form an important part of the innate immune system . They exhibit antimicrobial activity against a wide range of pathogenic microorganisms, have immune-modulatory effects and enhance the host defence against pathogenic bacteria [2–4]. AMPs are usually small cationic and amphiphatic peptides comprised of less than 40 amino acids with immense diversity in sequence, secondary structure motifs, charge and/or the abundance of certain specific amino acids . Their ability to selectively kill prokaryotic rather than eukaryotic cells, make them promising candidates for drug development. However, one drawback of most natural AMPs as therapeutics is their susceptibility to proteolytic degradation . To overcome this problem an approach known as peptidomimetics has emerged in recent years by which compounds are produced that mimic a peptide structure and/or function but carries a modified backbone and/or non-natural amino acids. The peptide-mimetic compounds have been designed based on essential biophysical characteristics of AMPs: charge, hydrophobicity, and amphiphatic organization [7–9]. Oligomeric N-substituted glycines, also known as peptoids, belong to the simpler AMP-mimetic designs. They are structurally similar to α-amino peptides, but the side chain is shifted to amide nitrogen instead of the α-carbon [10–12]. This feature offers several advantages including protease stability , and easy synthesis by the submonomer approach .
Due to their cationic and amphiphatic nature, it is believed that most AMPs selectively kill bacteria by penetrating the negatively charged cell membrane leading to membrane disintegration. However, during the last two decades it has become apparent that some AMPs may also act by other mechanisms without destruction of the cell membrane, namely, acting on intracellular targets leading to inhibition of enzymatic activities, cell wall synthesis and RNA, DNA and protein synthesis [5, 17, 18].
The inhibition of RNA, DNA and protein synthesis in bacteria is often the result of AMPs interacting with DNA [19, 20]. Additionally, interaction with DNA by the hexapeptide WRWYCR and its D-enantiomers was shown to interfere with DNA repair . DNA repair damage elicits the SOS response that is a conserved pathway essential for DNA repair and restart of stalled or collapsed replication forks, regulated by the repressor LexA and the activator RecA [22, 23].
In this study, we set out to investigate the mode of action (MOA) of LP5 using the pathogenic bacterium S. aureus. Collectively, our data suggest that LP5 has a dual mode of action; at MIC values it is able to bind DNA leading to inhibition of DNA biosynthesis, inhibition of the function of topoisomerase IV (Topo IV) and DNA gyrase and induction of the SOS response through recA. However, when using concentrations above the MIC, LP5 targets the bacterial membrane leading to disruption of the bacterial membrane.
Determination of MIC of LP5 against S. aureus
Given that the lysine-peptoid LP5 has antimicrobial activity toward a number of bacterial and fungal pathogens, we investigated how LP5 interacts with and affects the pathogenic bacterium S. aureus. We tested the MIC of LP5 against two S. aureus strains, 8325–4, a laboratory strain of human origin , and the clinically relevant community acquired strain USA300 . MIC was in the range of 16 to 32 μg/ml for both strains.
Permeabilization of the S. aureusmembrane by LP5 is concentration dependent
AMPs have previously been suggested to have multiple targets, including both intracellular targets and the membrane, depending on the concentration of the AMP . Indolicidin and the peptidomimetic oligo-acyl-lysine (OAK) C12K-2β12 (OAKs: a group of AMPs composed of amino fatty acids) induce membrane damage at magnitudes above their MICs, whereas around their MICs they were both found to have intracellular targets [27–29].
LP5 inhibits macromolecular synthesis of DNA and binds DNA in vitro
LP5 inhibits DNA gyrase and Topo IV and induces the SOS response through the recA gene
Since LP5 inhibits DNA synthesis and binds DNA we speculated that the DNA replication machinery was affected by LP5. Some of the main players of bacterial DNA replication are the type II topoisomerases, DNA gyrase and Topo IV. DNA gyrase is responsible for the removal of positive supercoils in front of the advancing replication fork, whereas Topo IV decatenates the precatenanes behind the replication fork . To investigate if the activity of these enzymes is influenced by LP5 in vitro, supercoiling and decatenation assays were performed using S. aureus DNA gyrase and Topo IV, respectively. The supercoiling and decatenation activity of S. aureus DNA gyrase and Topo IV was measured in the presence of various concentrations of LP5 with ciprofloxacin used as a positive control .
To our knowledge these results show for the first time that a peptoid is able to bind DNA, induce the SOS response and interfere with the functions of DNA gyrase and Topo IV.
In conclusion, we propose a model in which LP5 exerts a dual MOA. At 1 × MIC the lysine-peptoid hybrid traverses the cytoplasmic membrane of S. aureus without causing lethal damage and binds the chromosomal DNA, inhibits topo IV and DNA gyrase and thereby the replication machinery by blocking the accessibility to DNA. The inhibitory effect on DNA replication induces the SOS response leading to inhibition of growth. At concentrations of 5 × MIC and above, LP5 also targets the cell membrane leading to leakage of intracellular compounds like ATP, resulting in cell death. These results add new information about the MOA of a new synthetic peptide, and advance our knowledge of these compounds as potential antimicrobial therapeutics.
The synthesis of LP5 was performed using a combination of the sub-monomer approach and Fmoc SPPS, as previously described .
Strains and culture conditions
Three S. aureus strains were used in this study: Strain 8325–4 , FPR3757 USA300 a multidrug resistant community-acquired strain (CA-MRSA) implicated in outbreaks of skin and soft tissue infection  and HI2682, which contains a recA-lacZ fusion made in this study as described below. The bacteria were grown in Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB, CM0129 Oxoid). When appropriate, antibiotics were added at the following concentrations: 5 and 10 μg/ml tetracycline and 50 μg/ml ciprofloxacin (Sigma).
Minimum inhibitory concentration determination
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of LP5 was determined using the modified microtiter broth dilution assay for cationic antimicrobial peptides from Hancock (http://cmdr.ubc.ca/bobh/methods/MODIFIEDMIC.html). Briefly, serial 2- fold dilution of LP5 (at 10 times the required test concentration) was made in 0.2% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, A7906) and 0.01% acetic acid in polypropylene tubes. Overnight cultures of S. aureus 8325–4 and FPR3757 USA300 were diluted in Mueller Hinton broth (Oxoid, CM0405) to a final concentration of approximately 5 × 105 CFU/ml and 100 μl was added to each well of a 96-well polypropylene microtiter plate. To each well was added 11 μl of the 2-fold serial diluted LP5. The plate was incubated overnight and the MIC was read as the lowest concentration of peptide that inhibited visible growth of S. aureus. The reported results are from three independent experiments.
Determination of the effect of LP5 on the bacterial envelope - ATP measurements
Pore formation as caused by peptide addition was determined by measuring ATP leakage from the bacterial cell using a bioluminescence assay as previously described . S. aureus 8325–4 was grown in TSB at 37°C overnight and then re-inoculated in TSB at 37°C. S. aureus was harvested (3000 RPM, 10 min) at mid-exponential phase (OD546 of 2.5 ± 0.1), washed once in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0 and once in 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.0. The pellet was resuspended in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.0 to a final OD546 of 10. Bacteria were stored on ice and used within 5 h. Bacteria were energized in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.0) with 0.2% (w/v) glucose and treated with various concentrations of LP5 up to a concentration of 1000 μg/ml. ATP measurements were performed at time-point 0. ATP was determined using a bioluminescence kit (Sigma, FLAA-1KT) and a BioOrbit 1253 luminometer. Total ATP content was determined by rapidly permeabilizing 20 μl cell suspension with 80 μl dimethyl sulfoxide. The cell suspension was diluted in 4.9 ml sterile water, and ATP content was determined in 100 μl of the preparation as described by the manufacturer. To determine the extracellular ATP concentration, the 20 μl cell suspension was mixed with 80 μl sterile water and analysed as described above. Intracellular ATP concentrations were calculated by using the intracellular volumes of 0.85 μm3. The number of cells in suspension was determined by plate spreading. The reported results are from two independent experiments.
In vitro killing kinetics of S. aureus
S. aureus 8325–4 was grown overnight in TSB medium and diluted 1:50 in TSB medium and allowed to grow to OD600 of 0.2. LP5 was added to final concentrations equally to one (16 μg/ml) and five times (80 μg/ml) the MIC value, followed by incubation at 37°C while shaking. A control without LP5 was included. At the specified time points aliquots were diluted (serial 10-fold dilutions in saline) and plated on TSB agar. CFU were counted after an overnight incubation at 37°C. The reported results are from three independent experiments.
Survival of S. aureusafter LP5 exposure
The ability of S. aureus 8325–4 to resume growth after incubation with 1 × MIC was investigated as follows: bacteria were grown overnight in TSB medium and diluted 1:50 in TSB medium and allowed to grow to OD600 of 0.2 LP5 was added to a final concentration 1 × MIC, followed by incubation at 37°C while shaking. A control without LP5 was included. After 3 h cells were harvested and resuspended in fresh TSB medium and 3 × 100 μl cell suspension was added to 100 μl TSB medium in a 96-well microtiter plate. Growth was monitored by measuring the optical density at 600 nm every 20 min for 17 h by the Gen5™ program (BioTek®). The reported results are from two independent experiments.
Macromolecular synthesis and bacterial killing
Overnight cultures of S. aureus 8325–4 were diluted 1:50 in TSB and allowed to grow to OD600 of 0.2 1 μCi/ml (37MBq) of [methyl-3H] thymidine was added to the culture. After 10 min of incubation at 37°C, LP5 was added at 1 × MIC and 5 × MIC. Samples of 500 μl were removed immediately before addition of LP5 (0 min) and at 5, 10, 20 and 30 min after addition of LP5 and added to 2 volume of 99.9% ice cold EtOH and 0.1 volume of 3M sodium acetate (NaAc) pH 5.5 in order to precipitate macromolecules. After overnight precipitation at −20°C samples were collected by centrifugation (12000 rpm, 10 min) and washed twice in 1 ml of ice cold 70% EtOH. Samples were resuspended in 100 μl of milliQ water and added to 4 ml scintillation vials with EcoscintA liquid scintillation cocktail, and counts were obtained in a Beckman scintillation counter for 5 min for each sample using the tritium program. The reported results are from three independent experiments.
Gel retardation analysis was performed as previously described  by mixing 100 ng of plasmid DNA (pRMC2)  isolated from S. aureus 8325–4 with increasing amounts of LP5 in 20 μl binding buffer (5% w/v glycerol, 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM KCl and 50 μg/ml bovine serum albumin). Reaction mixtures were incubated 1 h at room temperature and subjected to 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualised using ethidium bromide. The reported results are one representative of four independent experiments, showing similar results.
Construction of recA-lacZ fusion
Plasmid pHI1496 carrying a lacZ gene was digested with SmaI and XhoI (New England Biolabs) and ligated into pCL25 (a vector carrying the L54a attachment site for integration into the lipase gene (geh) of the S. aureus chromosome)  digested with SmaI and SalI (New England Biolabs). The recA promoter was amplified by PCR using the primers RecA-BstBI-F (5′tatttcgaatacggcacctttaccgaaaga3′) and RecA-BamHI-R (5′tatttcgaatacggcacctttaccgaaaga3′) and was cloned into pCR®2.1-TOPO® (Invitrogen). The 663 bp recA sequence was excised from pCR®2.1-TOPO® using BstBI and BamHI (New England Biolabs) and cloned into BstBI/BamHI-cut lac-Z vector, to give pMTC100 in E. coli DH5α. The pMTC100 plasmid was electroporated into S. aureus RN4220  and recombinants selected on 10 μg/ml tetracycline. Since the pMTC100 do not contain a replicon active in S. aureus, tetracycline resistant clones occur as a result of a recombination event between the plasmid insert and the host. Finally, the recA::lacZ fusion from RN4220 was transduced into S. aureus 8325–4 using the Φ11 phage from S. aureus 8325 as the carrier , and selected on 5 μg/ml tetracycline plates. The expected integrational event was confirmed by colony-PCR using the primers RecA-BamHI-F (5′tatggatcctgacacattaattgagcaagctgt3′) and LexA/lacZ-R (5′cccattcgccattcagg3′). The strain is called HI2682.
Agar diffusion assay
The assay use a transcriptional reporter strain, HI2682, carrying lacZ fused to recA. 30 μl of 13.33 mg/ml LP5, 0.05 mg/ml ciprofloxacin or H2O was tested in the agar diffusion assay where the expression from the promoter of recA is monitored as previously described . Induction of the recA gene was monitored as colour change. The reported results are one representative of three independent experiments, showing similar results.
Supercoiling and decatenation assays
Supercoiling and decatenation assays were performed as previously described  with minor modifications in the reaction mixture content. In the reaction mixtures we used 5 μg/ml tRNA, various concentrations (0; 66.4; 132.7; 199.1; 265.4; 331.8 μg/ml) of LP5 and added either 100 fmol (as a tetramer) of S. aureus gyrase or 50 fmol of S. aureus Topo IV. In the control reaction 33 μg/ml ciprofloxacin was used instead of LP5. Additionally, the DNA products were purified with phenol/chloroform to deproteinize the reactions.
SG was funded by a PhD-grant from the Lundbeck Foundation and University of Copenhagen, DI was funded by The Lundbeck Foundation, CTG was funded by a PhD-grant from The Technical University of Denmark, SLS was funded by a Ph.D. grant from the University of Copenhagen and MTC was funded by Danish Research Council of Independent Research (274-08-0531).
- Zasloff M: Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature. 2002, 415: 389-395. 10.1038/415389a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown KL, Hancock RE: Cationic host defense (antimicrobial) peptides. Curr Opin Immunol. 2006, 18: 24-30. 10.1016/j.coi.2005.11.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lai Y, Gallo RL: AMPed up immunity: how antimicrobial peptides have multiple roles in immune defense. Trends Immunol. 2009, 30: 131-141. 10.1016/j.it.2008.12.003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pasupuleti M, Schmidtchen A, Malmsten M: Antimicrobial peptides: key components of the innate immune system. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2012, 32: 143-171. 10.3109/07388551.2011.594423.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jenssen H, Hamill P, Hancock RE: Peptide antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006, 19: 491-511. 10.1128/CMR.00056-05.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marr AK, Gooderham WJ, Hancock RE: Antibacterial peptides for therapeutic use: obstacles and realistic outlook. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006, 6: 468-472. 10.1016/j.coph.2006.04.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chongsiriwatana NP, Patch JA, Czyzewski AM, Dohm MT, Ivankin A, Gidalevitz D, Zuckermann RN, Barron AE: Peptoids that mimic the structure, function, and mechanism of helical antimicrobial peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105: 2794-2799. 10.1073/pnas.0708254105.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rotem S, Mor A: Antimicrobial peptide mimics for improved therapeutic properties. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009, 1788: 1582-1592. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.10.020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scott RW, DeGrado WF, Tew GN: De novo designed synthetic mimics of antimicrobial peptides. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008, 19: 620-627. 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.10.013.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simon RJ, Kania RS, Zuckermann RN, Huebner VD, Jewell DA, Banville S, Ng S, Wang L, Rosenberg S, Marlowe CK: Peptoids: a modular approach to drug discovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992, 89: 9367-9371. 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9367.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zuckermann RN, Kerr JM, Kent SBH, Moos WH: Efficient method for the preparation of peptoids [oligo(N-substituted glycines)] by submonomer solid-phase synthesis. J Am Chem Soc. 1992, 114: 10646-10647. 10.1021/ja00052a076.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Giuliani A, Rinaldi AC: Beyond natural antimicrobial peptides: multimeric peptides and other peptidomimetic approaches. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011, 68: 2255-2266. 10.1007/s00018-011-0717-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miller SM, Simon RJ, Ng S, Zuckermann RN, Kerr JM, Moos WH: Proteolytic studies of homologous peptide and N-substituted glycine peptoid oligomers. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1994, 4: 2657-2662. 10.1016/S0960-894X(01)80691-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryge TS, Frimodt-Moller N, Hansen PR: Antimicrobial activities of twenty lysine-peptoid hybrids against clinically relevant bacteria and fungi. Chemotherapy. 2008, 54: 152-156. 10.1159/000119707.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryge TS, Hansen PR: Novel lysine-peptoid hybrids with antibacterial properties. J Pept Sci. 2005, 11: 727-734. 10.1002/psc.705.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS, Edwards JE, Gilbert D, Rice LB, Scheld M, Spellberg B, Bartlett J: Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 48: 1-12. 10.1086/595011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hale JDF, Hancock REW: Alternative mechanisms of action of cationic antimicrobial peptides on bacteria. Expert Rev Anti infect Ther. 2007, 5: 951-959. 10.1586/1478722.214.171.1241.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peschel A, Sahl HG: The co-evolution of host cationic antimicrobial peptides and microbial resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006, 4: 529-536. 10.1038/nrmicro1441.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rotem S, Radzishevsky IS, Bourdetsky D, Navon-Venezia S, Carmeli Y, Mor A: Analogous oligo-acyl-lysines with distinct antibacterial mechanisms. FASEB J. 2008, 22: 2652-2661. 10.1096/fj.07-105015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sarig H, Goldfeder Y, Rotem S, Mor A: Mechanisms mediating bactericidal properties and conditions that enhance the potency of a broad-spectrum oligo-acyl-lysyl. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011, 55: 688-695. 10.1128/AAC.00666-10.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gunderson CW, Segall AM: DNA repair, a novel antibacterial target: Holliday junction-trapping peptides induce DNA damage and chromosome segregation defects. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 59: 1129-1148. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05009.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Butala M, Zgur-Bertok D, Busby SJ: The bacterial LexA transcriptional repressor. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009, 66: 82-93. 10.1007/s00018-008-8378-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cox MM: Regulation of bacterial RecA protein function. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2007, 42: 41-63. 10.1080/10409230701260258.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Novick R: Properties of a cryptic high-frequency transducing phage in Staphylococcus aureus. Virology. 1967, 33: 155-166. 10.1016/0042-6822(67)90105-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, Lin F, Lin J, Carleton HA, Mongodin EF, Sensabaugh GF, Perdreau-Remington F: Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2006, 367: 731-739. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68231-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang HW: Molecular mechanism of antimicrobial peptides: The origin of cooperativity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006, 1758: 1292-1302. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.02.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hsu CH, Chen C, Jou ML, Lee AY, Lin YC, Yu YP, Huang WT, Wu SH: Structural and DNA-binding studies on the bovine antimicrobial peptide, indolicidin: evidence for multiple conformations involved in binding to membranes and DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: 4053-4064. 10.1093/nar/gki725.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Makobongo MO, Gancz H, Carpenter BM, McDaniel DP, Merrell DS: The oligo-acyl lysyl antimicrobial peptide C12K-2beta12 exhibits a dual mechanism of action and demonstrates strong in vivo efficacy against Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012, 56: 378-390. 10.1128/AAC.00689-11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu M, Maier E, Benz R, Hancock RE: Mechanism of interaction of different classes of cationic antimicrobial peptides with planar bilayers and with the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1999, 38: 7235-7242. 10.1021/bi9826299.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patrzykat A, Friedrich CL, Zhang L, Mendoza V, Hancock REW: Sublethal Concentrations of pleurocidin-derived antimicrobial peptides inhibit macromolecular synthesis in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46: 605-614. 10.1128/AAC.46.3.605-614.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Subbalakshmi C, Sitaram N: Mechanism of antimicrobial action of indolicidin. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998, 160: 91-96. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb12896.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song YM, Park Y, Lim SS, Yang ST, Woo ER, Park IS, Lee JS, Kim JI, Hahm KS, Kim Y, Shin SY: Cell selectivity and mechanism of action of antimicrobial model peptides containing peptoid residues. Biochemistry. 2005, 44: 12094-12106. 10.1021/bi050765p.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hiasa H, Marians KJ: Two distinct modes of strand unlinking during theta-type DNA replication. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 21529-21535. 10.1074/jbc.271.35.21529.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oppegard LM, Hamann BL, Streck KR, Ellis KC, Fiedler HP, Khodursky AB, Hiasa H: In vivo and in vitro patterns of the activity of simocyclinone D8, an angucyclinone antibiotic from Streptomyces antibioticus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 2110-2119. 10.1128/AAC.01440-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mori T, Nakamura T, Okazaki N, Furukohri A, Maki H, Akiyama MT: Escherichia coli DinB inhibits replication fork progression without significantly inducing the SOS response. Genes Genet Syst. 2012, 87: 75-87. 10.1266/ggs.87.75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen A, Nielsen KF, Frees D, Larsen TO, Ingmer H: Method for screening compounds that influence virulence gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010, 54: 509-512. 10.1128/AAC.00940-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cirz RT, Jones MB, Gingles NA, Minogue TD, Jarrahi B, Peterson SN, Romesberg FE: Complete and SOS-mediated response of Staphylococcus aureus to the antibiotic ciprofloxacin. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 531-539. 10.1128/JB.01464-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryge TS, Hansen PR: Potent antibacterial lysine-peptoid hybrids identified from a positional scanning combinatorial library. Bioorg Med Chem. 2006, 14: 4444-4451. 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.02.034.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thomsen LE, Gottlieb CT, Gottschalk S, Wodskou TT, Kristensen HH, Gram L, Ingmer H: The heme sensing response regulator HssR in Staphylococcus aureus but not the homologous RR23 in Listeria monocytogenes modulates susceptibility to the antimicrobial peptide plectasin. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10: 307-10.1186/1471-2180-10-307.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park CB, Kim HS, Kim SC: Mechanism of action of the antimicrobial peptide buforin II: buforin II kills microorganisms by penetrating the cell membrane and inhibiting cellular functions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998, 244: 253-257. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8159.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Corrigan RM, Foster TJ: An improved tetracycline-inducible expression vector for Staphylococcus aureus. Plasmid. 2009, 61: 126-129. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2008.10.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luong TT, Lee CY: Improved single-copy integration vectors for Staphylococcus aureus. J Microbiol Methods. 2007, 70: 186-190. 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.04.007.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schenk S, Laddaga RA: Improved method for electroporation of Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992, 73: 133-138.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.