Skip to main content

Sequence polymorphisms of rfbT among the Vibrio cholerae O1 strains in the Ogawa and Inaba serotype shifts



Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1 has two major serotypes, Ogawa and Inaba, which may alternate among cholera epidemics. The rfbT gene is responsible for the conversion between the two serotypes. In this study, we surveyed the sequence variance of rfbT in the Ogawa and Inaba strains in China over a 48-year (1961-2008) period in which serotype shifts occurred among epidemic years.


Various mutation events including single nucleotide, short fragment insertions/deletions and transposases insertions, were found in the rfbT gene of the Inaba strains. Ectopically introducing an intact rfbT could overcome the mutations by converting the Inaba serotype to the Ogawa serotype, suggesting the effects of these mutations on the function of RfbT. Characteristic rfbT mutations were recognized in the Inaba strains among Inaba serotype dominant epidemic years which were separate from the Ogawa dominant epidemics. Three distinguishable mutation sites in rfbT between the classical and the El Tor biotype strains were identified and could serve as biotype-specific biomarkers.


Our results provide a comprehensive picture of the rfbT gene mutations among the V. cholerae O1 strains in different epidemic periods, which could be further used as the tracing markers in clonality analysis and dissemination surveillance of the epidemic strains.


Cholera is a severe disease characterized by watery diarrhea that is caused by the gram-negative bacterium V. cholerae. The massive diarrhea experienced by patients is mainly due to the colonization of toxigenic V. cholerae strains in the small intestine and their production of cholera toxin (CT) [1]. Cholera continues to be a major public health concern in many developing countries [2, 3]. Outbreaks of cholera have been increasing globally in the past decade, most recently in Haiti [4].

V. cholerae is naturally present in the environment and autochthonous to coastal and estuarine ecosystems. Based on the heat-stable somatic O antigen, the species V. cholerae is divided into more than 200 serogroups [5, 6]. Only two serogroups, O1 and O139, have thus far been demonstrated to cause epidemic and pandemic cholera. Seven pandemics caused by V. cholerae O1 have been reported since 1871. V. cholerae O139 emerged in late 1992 on the India subcontinent [7, 8]. V. cholerae O1 exists as two biotypes, classical and El Tor, which are distinguished by a variety of phenotypic markers, and differ in the severity of their infections and ability to survive outside the human intestine as well [3, 911]. Two of the first six cholera pandemics are known to have been caused by the classical biotype, while the ongoing seventh pandemic, which began in 1961, is caused by the El Tor biotype.

The vast majority of strains within the O1 serogroup display one of two serotypes, Ogawa or Inaba. A third serotype called Hikojima also exists, but is rare and unstable and not recognized by some authorities [3]. The Ogawa and Inaba serotypes differ by the presence of a 2-O- methyl group in the nonreducing terminal carbohydrate in the Ogawa O antigen [12, 13]. The O antigen is not a primary gene product, but rather, an assemblage of sugar moieties. The genes responsible for the synthesis of the O1-specific antigens are present in a cluster designated the rfb region [14]. Genetic changes in this region are correlated with specific somatic antigens which are serologically different. The serogroup O139 resulted from a 22 kb deletion of the rfb region of an O1 El Tor strain, with replacement by a 35 kb wbf region encoding the O139 specific O antigen [15].

Serotype conversion within the O1 serogroup has been demonstrated to occur during subculture in vitro, passage in vivo, epidemics and during phage treatment [1621]. Genetic alterations in the rfbT gene account for the serotype shift which encodes a transferase responsible for the expression of the Ogawa-specific antigen [19, 22, 23]. Site-specific sequence mutations causing a frameshift in the rfbT gene, thus producing truncated RfbT proteins, were previously detected in Inaba strains [19, 22, 24]. Generally, the serotype shift occurs more frequently in the direction of Ogawa to Inaba [3]. Experimentally providing the intact rfbT gene can convert the Inaba serotype to the Ogawa serotype, but this cannot be achieved during the natural infection process. Theoretically, one Ogawa strain may arise from the reversion of an original mutation, but the correction of the specific substitution or deletion is necessarily a rare event [3, 22]. Mutations in rfbT were used to assess the clonal origin and dissemination of clinical Inaba isolates [24]. The serotype shift pattern of cholera in endemic areas was also historically observed [25, 26] and indicated to be associated with high, but incomplete, cross-immunity between the Ogawa and Inaba serotypes [20].

Continuous surveys on the Inaba strains may reveal more mutations of the rfbT gene, and even clonality of the epidemic V. cholerae strains. In China the seventh cholera pandemic caused by O1 El Tor V. cholerae started in July 1961 [27]. Notifiable cases of cholera reported to the national disease surveillance and reporting system showed that there were serotype shifts during the years of El Tor biotype epidemics. In this study, diversity of the rfbT sequence and the effect of the rfbT mutations on the serotyping were investigated. Characteristic mutations causing serotype shifts in different Inaba predominant epidemics were observed.


Bacteria strains, media and plasmids

This study was conducted on 134 O1 El Tor and 1 O1 classical V. cholerae strains isolated from different provinces in China from 1961 to 2008,together with 18 laboratory-collected O1 classical strains and 10 O1 El Tor strains isolated outside of China (Additional file 1: Table S1). All strains were recovered from −80°C laboratory stocks. Slide agglutination tests were used to serotype the strains using anti-Ogawa and anti-Inaba monoclonal antibodies (S&A reagents lab, Bangkok, Thailand). Classical biotype strains were further confirmed using the Classical IV bacteriophage susceptibility assay [28] and the polymyxin B (50U) susceptibility assay with V. cholerae 569B and N16961 used as reference strains. The pBR322 plasmid was used as the cloning vector. Suicide plasmid pCVD442 was used to engineer mutations in host strains via allelic exchange. Escherichia coli strain Top10 and SM10λpir were used as the recipient strains. All strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates at 37°C. Ampicillin was used at a final concentration of 100 μg/ml when necessary.

PCR amplification and construction of complementary plasmid

PCR amplification was carried out using standard protocols with rfbt-up (5′ GCG TCG ACG AAT CGG CAG TCG CAA CA 3′) and rfbt-dn (5′ CCC AAG CTT CAA AGC TAT ACT AAA CTG 3′) primers. A water-boiled template of each strain was used. The 1441 bp PCR products were purified with a QIAGEN PCR purification kit (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany) and applied for commercial sequencing. The nucleotide and deduced protein sequences were analyzed with the MegAlign program included in the DNASTAR software package (DNA Star Inc., Madison, WI). The PCR product of rfbT from Ogawa strain O395 was cloned into pBR322 after gel purification and cleavage with Sal I and Hind III. The resulting plasmid, pBR322-rfbT, expressed the rfbT gene from its own promoter.

Construction of mutant

T472C substitution mutant was constructed by allelic exchange using Ogawa strain 7743 as a wild-type precursor which was an ideal natural vaccine candidate strain selected in our laboratory previously [29, 30]. The target sequences was amplified with primer pair rfbT-472C-up-Sal I/rfbT-472C-dn-Sac I (5′ AAC GTC GAC GAG GTA GTA ATG AAA CAT CT 3′/5′ CGA GCT C AG GAA TTC ACA GCA CAT C 3′, in which the nucleotides in italics indicate the restriction sites) using strain ZJ05023 as the template which contains T472C substitution on the chromosomal rfbT gene. The 978 bp amplification product was directionally cloned into pUC19 using E. coli TOP10 as the host and confirmed by sequencing of both DNA strands with M13 forward and reverse primers. The corresponding Sal I/Sac I fragment was subsequently subcloned into suicide plasmid pCVD442. The resulting suicide plasmid was constructed in E. coli SM10λpir and mobilized into Ogawa strain 7743 by conjugation. Exconjugants were selected on LB agar containing PolB (100 unit/ml) and Amp (150 μg/ml) and streaked on LB agar containing 15% (w/v) sucrose. Sucrose-resistant colonies were tested for Amp sensitivity and then screened for serotype conversion with slide agglutination tests. The colonies displaying Inaba serotype was confirmed by DNA sequencing using primers rfbT-472C-up-Sal I and rfbT-472C-dn-Sac I.

Gene complementation

rfbT complementation tests were performed by introducing the rfbT-expressing plasmid pBR322-rfbT into selected V. cholerae Inaba strains by electroporation as described by Chiang and Mekalanos [31]. Overnight cultures from fresh single colonies were subcultured 1:100 in LB and grown to mid-log phase at 37°C on a roller shaker. Cells from 5 ml of a mid-log-phase culture were washed three times in 2.5 ml of ice-cold 2 mM CaCl2, and then resuspended in 100 μl of ice-cold 2 mM CaCl2. The electroporated cells were recovered at 30°C for 2 h without shaking and plated on LB agar containing ampicillin (100 μg/ml). Colonies from each electroporation were re-streaked on LB agar containing ampicillin and used to screen for serotype conversion with slide agglutination tests.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

The PFGE analysis was conducted as described in the literature [32]. Briefly, cell suspensions were adjusted to an optical density of 4.0–4.2 using the Densimat photometer (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Agarose plugs were prepared, and the organisms in the plugs were digested using 20 U per slice of Not I. Electrophoresis was performed using a CHEF-DRIII system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The BioNumerics software package (version 4.0; Applied Maths, Inc.) was used to analyze the PFGE patterns. A dendrogram was produced using the Dice coefficient and the unweighted-pair group method with an arithmetic mean algorithm (UPGMA) with a position tolerance of 1.3%.

Nucleotide sequences and accession numbers

The rfbT genes with sequence variation from the Chinese strains were deposited in the NCBI database under accession numbers JX565645-JX565687, respectively. The rfbT sequences of strains N16961 [33], MJ-1236 [34], M66-2 [35], 2010EL-1786 [36], RC9 (accession number ACHX01000006.1), B33 [34], CIRS101 [34], IEC224 [37], LMA3984-4 [38] and NIH35A3 (accession number X59779) were downloaded from the NCBI database.


Serotype shifts during the cholera epidemics in China

Based on the surveillance data, cholera epidemics in China can be recognized as occurring in three different periods, with peaks of reported cases in 1962, 1980 and 1994, and the intervening periods respectively [39, 40]. As shown in Figure 1, the Ogawa serotype dominated during the first epidemic period from 1961 to 1964, while the Inaba dominated the second epidemic period from 1978 to 1989. During the third epidemic period from 1993 to 2000, Ogawa reemerged as the dominant serotype, although a new serogroup, O139, emerged in 1993. Each transition of the dominant serotype was followed by the appearance of a new epidemic peak. After 2000, cholera subsided to a very low level of epidemic, but serotype shifts were still observed. The Inaba serotype significantly increased in 2001 and 2002 after having almost disappeared for ten years. The Inaba serotype upsurged in 2005 and decreased in 2006.

Figure 1
figure 1

Reported cases in the cholera surveillance of China and the dominant serotypes of V. cholerae O1 strains during the different epidemic years.

Sequence variations in Ogawa serotype strains

A previous study with a very limited number of strains showed no significant sequence mutations in the Ogawa serotype [22]. Here we sequenced the rfbT genes of 71 Ogawa isolates, including 6 classical strains and 65 El Tor strains (Additional file 1: Table S1). Except strains 6310, 6312 and 63–12 (from Indonesia), 863 (from Mauritania) and C7258 (from Peru), the El Tor strains were isolated from 13 different provinces in China over a 44-year period. In addition, the rfbT sequences of four whole genome-sequenced Ogawa strains, M66-2 (from Indonesia in 1937, a pre-seventh pandemic strain) [35], B33 (from Mozambique in 2004) [34], RC9 (from Kenya in 1985, accession number ACHX01000006) and 2010EL-1786 (from Haiti in 2010) [36], were retrieved from the NCBI database. The ORF of rfbT (Vch1786_I2540) in 2010EL-1786 was recognized as a fragment of 903bp in its annotation file. After carefully examined the sequence, we revised the sequence by removing the additional 42 bps from the 5′ side (positions 2687324–2687365 in the genomic sequence of NC_016445.1) in our analysis.

The sequence alignments of 75 Ogawa strains revealed high homology in rfbT nucleotide sequence except for three sites which were different, but conserved between classical and El Tor biotypes respectively. All 69 El Tor biotype Ogawa strains had identical sequences. Compared with the sequences of El Tor biotype, substitutions of T for G at position 137 (G137T), TACA303-306ACAC (as the result of T-303 deletion and a C insertion after C-307 in the classical Ogawa strains) and C487A were found in all six classical Ogawa strains (Additional file 2: Figure S1), which resulted in amino acid changes of W46L, T102H and Q163K, respectively. Strain 16503 has another mutation G456A compared with all other Ogawa strains. Since all the strains are Ogawa serotype, we inferred that these non-synonymous mutations did not affect the function of the RfbT transferase.

Sequence variations in Inaba serotype strains

We sequenced rfbT of 74 Inaba isolates from 19 provinces during the 1961–2008 epidemics in China, together with 18 Inaba strains isoloated outside of China (Additional file 1: Table S1). Totally there are 14 classical Inaba strains. Additionally, the sequence of rfbT in classical Inaba strain NIH35A3 (accession number X59779) and five other whole genome-sequenced El Tor Inaba strains including N16961 [33], IEC224 [37], MJ-1236 [34], CIRS101 [34] and LMA3984-4 [38]) were obtained from GenBank genome database and added to the comparison. The rfbT gene (VCD_001363) of MJ-1236 was recognized as a shorter fragment of 819 bp in its annotation file, we revised the sequence by including a 49 nucleotide region exactly located in the upstream of the originally recognized start codon “TTG” (positions 375973–376021 in the genomic sequence of CP001485.1) in our analysis after sequence examination and alignment.

The sequence comparison of rfbT from totally 98 Inaba strains revealed multiplex mutational events (Table 1), which had occurred in 21 positions along the rfbT gene. One type of mutation was transposable element mediated. Specifically, an IS Vch5 transposase was inserted at the C49TTG site of the rfbT sequence in strain SD95001, with the 4-bp insertion sequence duplication. A transposase OrfAB gene element was inserted in the rfbT genes of strains N16961, IEC224, LMA3984-4 and GX06002. The transposase OrfAB gene contains two partially overlapping open reading frames, with 8 bp terminal inverted repeats (TGTAGTGG/CCACTACA) (Figure 2). It was uniquely inserted at the A189AAC site of the rfbT coding sequence in N16961, IEC224 and LMA3984-4. In contrast in the GX06002 strain, it was reversely inserted at the A41AAC site. Both insertion events duplicated the target sequence which flanked at both sides of transposase OrfAB (Figure 2).

Table 1 Nucleotide sequence changes in the rfbT gene of different Inaba strains of V. cholerae O1 El Tor relative to El Tor Ogawa strain B33
Figure 2
figure 2

The sequence alignment of the transposase OrfAB insertion regions in the rfbT gene. The 8-bp terminal inverted repeats are underlined; possible duplicated AAAC insertion sequences are italicized and in bold; the ORFs of the transposase OrfAB element are shown by hollow arrows with the indicated start and end codons.

Other sequences variations were due to nucleotide mutations, including deletions, insertions and base substitutions (Table 1). Compared to the El Tor biotype Ogawa strain B33, 39.8% (39/98) of the analyzed Inaba strains exhibited single nucleotide mutations (deletion, insertion or substitution) at different positions of the rfbT gene which caused a frameshift and resulted in truncated RfbT proteins. Additionally, three particular mutations at positions 137, 472 and 487 were found to cause non-synonymous mutations. The substitutions of G137T and C487A in all 14 classical Inaba strains, compared to the rfbT sequence of El Tor Ogawa strain B33, resulted in a replacement of W46L and Q163K, respectively, the same as had been found in the classical Ogawa strains (Additional file 2: Figure S1). The substitution of T472C of rfbT in strains FJ05234, ZJ05023, FJ147, GD05039, HL08091 and CIRS101 resulted in a change of S158P of RfbT, which is the only single mutation found in these strains and suggests that a Ser residue at this position is critical for the function of the RfbT transferase. Another important site is position 482, for the resulting Y161 to F substitution determined Inaba phenotype in XJ05021 too.

The insertion of C at the position after C-307 occurred in all 14 classical Inaba strains, but caused two different mutations (Table 1, Additional file 2: Figure S1). In strains 16121, 16148, 16510, 16186, 16177, 16159, 16156, and NIH35A3, this insertion caused a frameshift mutation, subsequently formed an internal stop codon after position 348, leading to premature termination of RfbT translation. Whereas in strains 569B, 1119, 16020, 16002, 16505 and 16507, the reading frame was maintained since this insertion was counteracted by the prior deletion at position 303. The combined effect of the two sites of mutations led to the replacement of T102H in these strains. The Inaba phenotype of theses strains resulted from the truncated RfbT caused by an A-494 deletion or G655T substitution (only for 569B) on the posterior sequence. Strains V01, C6706, X190 which were isolated from South America had identical single nucleotide mutation different from E506 isolated from America. In addition, 48.0% (47/98) of the strains were noted to have short-sequence indels (insertions/deletions) resulting in truncated and prematurely-terminated RfbT proteins.

Characteristic mutations of Inaba strains in the Inaba dominant epidemics in China

During the cholera epidemics from 1961 to 2008 in China, Ogawa/Inaba serotype shifts were observed. Three Inaba serotype dominant multiyear epidemics occurred in 1976–1989, 2001–2002 and around 2005. In this study, most (42/45) Inaba strains isolated in 1979–1988 displayed the identical mutation of 11-bp (GCTGAACATCC) deletion (Figure 3). These strains were isolated from 11 different provinces, and were characterized with the marker mutation of rfbT in the epidemics (Table 1). PFGE subtyping on 36 of these 41 strains (Additional file 3: Figure S2) showed that 17 strains possessed the same pattern, while other patterns only displayed 1–3 band differences compared to the predominant pattern, with similarity coefficient values of 93.0%-97.7%, indicating they were closely related in terms of their genetic background. Among three other strains, two showed GACACAT insertion after T-237, one strain had an A insertion after G-55, both caused the frameshift and truncated RfbT proteins (Table 1). These rfbT mutations resulted in sporadic Inaba strains in these epidemics.

Figure 3
figure 3

Minimal spanning tree of 74 Inaba strains of O1 El Tor V. cholerae isolated in China based on the rfbT sequence. Subtypes are indicated by circles, whose diameter increases as the number of strains increases. Colors were used to indicate the different time periods when the strains were isolated. The strain names in different subtypes are shown in the corresponding circles except the one labeled A. Strains in circle A were characterized with 11-bp deletion and isolated during the first Inaba dominated epidemic period (1979–1988). Circle A includes strain BJ821, JX801361, BJ83801, FJ85063, HN8232, JS80269, JX801360, SD83101, AH88602, FJ86104, HN81331, JX801309, JX801363, BJ83795, JS80215, JX801305, JX84172, JX8788, SD83163, SD83164, SD83167, SX8429, JX801342, HN84345, FJ80004, GD791080, GD791084, GD861812, HN81175, JX801295, JX8659, JX87123, SC83535, ZJ861071, FJ8004, JX84190, LN85092, SD83176, JX801290, JS80252, FJ85010 and ZJ82428.

During 2001–2002 Inaba serotype dominant epidemics, all test seven Inaba strains isolated from six provinces had the same G3A substitution only, which caused disappearance of the start codon (ATG) and thus no translation of the 114 amino acid residues of RfbT N-terminal (Table 1, Figure 3). Among the six Inaba strains isolated in the epidemic of 2005, four showed predominant A472T mutation which resulted in S158P of RfbT, whereas the other two strains (ZJ05070 and XJ05021) had different mutations (Table 1, Figure 3). In different Inaba serotype dominant epidemics the strains had the individually predominant mutations within RfbT. Different rfbT mutations were observed among the Inaba strains in the non-Inaba-dominant years (Table 1, Figure 3). The same rfbT mutations were sometimes found in the Inaba strains isolated in the non-Inaba-dominant years, even from different countries, such as transposase insertion, A-494 deletion and GACACAT insertion (Table 1), suggesting the hot spots of mutation, or wide distribution of such strains.

Seroconversion of the Inaba strain containing a rfbT expressing-plasmid and construction of T472 C substitution mutant in Ogawa background

To determine the rfbT mutations observed in this study were responsible for the serotyping, we induced the seroconversion of Inaba strains by introducing the recombinant plasmid pBR-rfbT carrying intact rfbT gene. Twelve Inaba strains which contained different frameshifts were selected. Agglutination of the transformed strains with specific typing sera showed that all but one (GX06002) had been converted from Inaba to Ogawa. Interestingly, for strain GX06002, some transformed colonies were converted to Ogawa, while other colonies maintained the Inaba serotype. One possible explanation for this result may be the different copy numbers of the plasmid in the host cells. Chiang et al. also reported that the presence of one copy of rfbT on the chromosome is not sufficient to restore the Ogawa serotype [31].

To further confirm that single point mutation only causing non-synonymous mutation was truly involved in the serotype shift, we performed the opposite experiment, i. e. induction of Inaba serotype in Ogawa strains. We created the T472C substitution on the chromosomal rfbT gene of Ogawa strain 7743 through homologous recombination. As expected, this substitution caused serotype shift from Ogawa to Inaba in strain 7743. Subsequent introducing the recombinant plasmid pBR-rfbT carrying intact the rfbT gene induced the seroconversion from Inaba to Ogawa phenotype. Taken together, our study experimentally demonstrated T472C substitution is truly involved in the serotype shift.


In this study, we presented the descriptive data regarding cholera serotype-cycling in China over a 48-year (1961–2008) period, and also noted the multiplicity of rfbT sequence variations in V. cholerae O1 isolates. Three single nucleotide substitutions and deletion mutations of rfbT have been reported which caused serotype switching due to a frameshift or crucial amino acid residue change in RfbT [22, 41, 42]. In our study much more mutations are found in the Inaba serotype strains, including single amino acid residue substitutions, frameshifts caused by single nucleotide and short fragment insertions/deletions, and transposition events. These mutations occurred randomly over the entire open reading frame of rfbT, which may suggest the mutations occurred frequently and differently under pressures from environment and human immunity, as well as spontaneous mutation. With the complementation of the intact rfbT gene, these Inaba strains were converted to the Ogawa serotype, which validate the mutations on the Inaba serotype conversion.

Our study provides the first evidence that mobile genetic elements, including the transposase OrfAB and IS Vch5 transposase, are involved in inactivating the rfbT of V. cholerae, thus contributing to the serotype interconversion. The insertion of the two kinds of transposases both led to duplication of the inserted sequence. Although there is difference in terms of the insertion position and orientation, the target sequence (AAAC) of the transposase OrfAB elements in different strains was the same. We further surveyed the distribution of transposase OrfAB copies in several strains which genome sequences are available. The copy number and the distribution of transposase OrfAB on chromosomes I and/or II vary in strains from different regions and years. Strain N16961 contains six copies, each chromosome harbors three copies. In IEC224, in addition to the three copies on each chromosome, there is an additional transposase OrfAB subunit B on chromosome I. In strain MJ-1236, all four copies are located on chromosome II. All these and our data suggest that the transposase OrfAB is quite active in transposition in V. cholerae, and probably has preferential insertion site(s). For the first time, IS 5 transposase was found to be involved in the serotype conversion. Two copies of IS 5 transposase are present on chromosome II of the N16961, 2010EL-1786, M66-2 and IEC224, while in strain SD95001, the IS 5 transposase inserts into the N-terminal of the rfbT gene that was generally located on chromosome I.

The characteristic nucleotide polymorphisms are also observed in the rfbT of the classical biotype and El Tor biotype, irrespective of the serotypes. These include G137T, C insertion after C-307 and C487A in all classical strains when compared to El Tor strains (reference sequence is from El Tor Ogawa strain B33, Additional file 2: Figure S1), which suggests that these sites in rfbT could be used as nucleotide markers to differentiate both biotypes, as has been shown for other gene alleles, such as tcpA, rstR and ctxB[4345].

In endemic areas of cholera, it has long been noticed that the dominant serotypes tend to fluctuate, with shifts occurring in the intervals between epidemics of the disease [20, 25]. A similar serotype conversion order (Ogawa-Inaba-Ogawa) observed in Bangladesh was found in China. The Ogawa serotype dominated in the early period of the 1960s in China, consistent with a report that the Ogawa serotype was the predominant serotype for a period before 1966 in Bangladesh [20]. The transition of Ogawa to Inaba occurred in 1978 in China, 12 years later than the switch in Bangladesh. After 11 years when the Inaba serotype dominated (1978–1989), the Ogawa serotype again took over the dominance in the 1990s. A similar trend in the prevalence of the Ogawa serotype was also observed in India and Pakistan during almost the same period [41, 46].

Questions may raise about the mutations on rfbT among the strains in the Inaba dominant epidemics. An 11-bp deletion event was found to be a distinguishable characteristic of Inaba strains during the Inaba dominant ten year period from 1979 to 1988, indicating that these strains may have originated from a common ancestral clone with this mutation, and then disseminated widely during the second epidemic period in China. It was supported by the PFGE fingerprints by showing same or highly similar patterns of these strains, which may have been caused by the minor variations accumulated gradually in such a clone during its long epidemic history (Additional file 3: Figure S2). Such deletion may be mediated by homologous recombination of a 5-bp repeat sequence (CATCC GCTGAA CATCC changed to CATCC, where the nucleotides in bold indicate the sequence deleted, and the italicized nucleotides are the repeated sequence).

Predominant mutations of rfbT were also observed in the Inaba strains during Inaba dominant epidemic years of 2001–2002 and 2005. Inaba strains in 2001–2002 had the single nucleotide substitution which changed the start codon ATG to ATA, complementation of intact rfbT into such strain converted the serotype to be Ogawa, showing the role of this nucleotide mutation. T472C was the only nonsynonymous mutation that accounts for a serotype shift in the Inaba strains in 2005, and we experimentally demonstrated the critical role of a serine at this site for the function of RfbT. The same single substitution was also reported in the Inaba strains isolated during different years (2005–2008) in Iran [42] and India [41].

Characteristic rfbT mutations occurred in different Inaba serotype dominant epidemics, which may suggest the clonality of the epidemic strains. These mutations can be used as the sequence signatures in the clonal and evolutionary analysis, and even the tracking markers in epidemiological investigations. Serotype conversion and serotype-shifting in cholera epidemics have been thought to be related to the immune response of individuals and the immune status of the overall population, and has also been documented in animal models [20, 22, 26]. Thereby it could be deduced that in the cholera endemic regions rfbT mutation will be an advantage for the spread of Inaba strains following Ogawa serotype epidemic. In general, the conversion of serotype from Ogawa to Inaba is easy to occur, which is simply a rfbT mutant enrichment procedure [22]. While the reciprocal serotype conversion, from Inaba to Ogawa, is much more difficult considering the requirement of the reversion of the original mutation and the great variety of the rfbT genetic status of Inaba strains. Maybe, the Inaba strains caused by transposase insertion could be relatively liable to reverse to Ogawa phenotype due to the active mobile ability of the insertion element. Some strains were noticed to have accumulated multiple mutations, it remains a puzzle if this represents a transitional state of overcoming the original mutation by introducing the second or third mutation.


Our study presents the rfbT sequence variations of V. cholerae O1 isolates during the serotype shifts over a 48-year period in China. Different types of mutational events and new mutation sites resulting in abnormal translation of rfbT are observed, and characteristic rfbT mutations in different Inaba serotype dominant epidemic periods are found. These distinguishable mutations can be used as the tracing markers in the epidemic clone analysis, and even surveillance for dissemination of specific clones. The rfbT mutation and subsequent serotype shifts of the epidemic strains also could be considered as one type of adaption to population immunity barrier in the cholera endemic regions.



Cholera toxin




Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis


Arithmetic mean algorithm.


  1. Herrington DA, Hall RH, Losonsky G, Mekalanos JJ, Taylor RK, Levine MM: Toxin, toxin-coregulated pili, and the toxR regulon are essential for Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis in humans. J Exp Med. 1988, 168 (4): 1487-1492. 10.1084/jem.168.4.1487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Faruque SM, Albert MJ, Mekalanos JJ: Epidemiology, genetics, and ecology of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998, 62 (4): 1301-1314.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaper JB, Morris JG, Levine MM: Cholera. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995, 8 (1): 48-86.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ivers LC, Walton DA: The “first” case of cholera in Haiti: lessons for global health. Am J Trop Med Hygiene. 2012, 86 (1): 36-38. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd EF, Waldor MK: Evolutionary and functional analyses of variants of the toxin-coregulated pilus protein TcpA from toxigenic Vibrio cholerae non-O1/non-O139 serogroup isolates. Microbiol (Reading, England). 2002, 148 (Pt 6): 1655-1666.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatterjee SN, Chaudhuri K: Lipopolysaccharides of Vibrio cholerae. I. Physical and chemical characterization. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2003, 1639 (2): 65-79. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2003.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramamurthy T, Garg S, Sharma R, Bhattacharya SK, Nair GB, Shimada T, Takeda T, Karasawa T, Kurazano H, Pal A: Emergence of novel strain of Vibrio cholerae with epidemic potential in southern and eastern India. Lancet. 1993, 341 (8846): 703-704.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Albert MJ, Siddique AK, Islam MS, Faruque AS, Ansaruzzaman M, Faruque SM, Sack RB: Large outbreak of clinical cholera due to Vibrio cholerae non-O1 in Bangladesh. Lancet. 1993, 341 (8846): 704-

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Koelle K, Pascual M, Yunus M: Pathogen adaptation to seasonal forcing and climate change. Proc. 2005, 272 (1566): 971-977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reidl J, Klose KE: Vibrio cholerae and cholera: out of the water and into the host. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002, 26 (2): 125-139. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00605.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Woodward WE, Mosley WH: The spectrum of cholera in rural Bangladesh. II. Comparison of El Tor Ogawa and classical Inaba infection. Am J Epidemiol. 1972, 96 (5): 342-351.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hisatsune K, Kondo S, Isshiki Y, Iguchi T, Haishima Y: Occurrence of 2-O-methyl-N-(3-deoxy-L-glycero-tetronyl)-D-perosamine (4-amino-4,6-dideoxy-D-manno-pyranose) in lipopolysaccharide from Ogawa but not from Inaba O forms of O1 Vibrio cholerae. Biochem Biophysic Res Comm. 1993, 190 (1): 302-307. 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1046.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ito T, Higuchi T, Hirobe M, Hiramatsu K, Yokota T: Identification of a novel sugar, 4-amino-4,6-dideoxy-2-O-methylmannose in the lipopolysaccharide of Vibrio cholerae O1 serotype Ogawa. Carbohydrate Res. 1994, 256 (1): 113-128. 10.1016/0008-6215(94)84231-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Faruque SM, Nair GB, Mekalanos JJ: Genetics of stress adaptation and virulence in toxigenic Vibrio cholerae. DNA Cell Biol. 2004, 23 (11): 723-741. 10.1089/dna.2004.23.723.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Comstock LE, Johnson JA, Michalski JM, Morris JG, Kaper JB: Cloning and sequence of a region encoding a surface polysaccharide of Vibrio cholerae O139 and characterization of the insertion site in the chromosome of Vibrio cholerae O1. Mole Microbiol. 1996, 19 (4): 815-826. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.407928.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhaskaran K, Gorrill RH: A study of antigenic variation in Vibrio cholerae. J Gen Microbiol. 1957, 16 (3): 721-729. 10.1099/00221287-16-3-721.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sack RB, Miller CE: Progressive changes of Vibrio serotypes in germ-free mice infected with Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol. 1969, 99 (3): 688-695.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sheehy TW, Sprinz H, Augerson WS, Formal SB: Laboratory Vibrio cholerae infection in the United States. Jama. 1966, 197 (5): 321-326. 10.1001/jama.1966.03110050059016.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ito T, Hiramatsu K, Ohshita Y, Yokota T: Mutations in the rfbT gene are responsible for the Ogawa to inaba serotype conversion in Vibrio cholerae O1. Microbiol Immunol. 1993, 37 (4): 281-288.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Koelle K, Pascual M, Yunus M: Serotype cycles in cholera dynamics. Proc. 2006, 273 (1603): 2879-2886.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ogg JE, Ogg BJ, Shrestha MB, Poudayl L: Antigenic changes in Vibrio cholerae biotype eltor serotype Ogawa after bacteriophage infection. Infect Immunity. 1979, 24 (3): 974-978.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stroeher UH, Karageorgos LE, Morona R, Manning PA: Serotype conversion in Vibrio cholerae O1. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89 (7): 2566-2570. 10.1073/pnas.89.7.2566.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ito T, Ohshita Y, Hiramatsu K, Yokota T: Identification and nucleotide sequence determination of the gene responsible for Ogawa serotype specificity of V. cholerae 01. FEBS letters. 1991, 286 (1–2): 159-162.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rijpkema SG, Durrani Z, Ramamurthy T, Nair GB: Assessing clonality of Vibrio cholerae Inaba isolates by characterization of nonsense mutations in wbeT. J Med Microbiol. 2004, 53 (Pt 11): 1105-1107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Felsenfeld O: A review of recent trends in cholera research and control. With an annex on the isolation and identification of cholera vibrios. Bull World Health Org. 1966, 34 (2): 161-195.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Longini IM, Yunus M, Zaman K, Siddique AK, Sack RB, Nizam A: Epidemic and endemic cholera trends over a 33-year period in Bangladesh. J Infect Dis. 2002, 186 (2): 246-251. 10.1086/341206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wei CY: Cholera prevention and control - China, 1961–2011. J Prev Med Inf. 2012, 28 (7): 497-504.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mukerjee S, Roy UK, Rudra BC: Studies on typing of cholera vibrios by bacteriophage. V. Geographical distribution of phage-types of vibrio cholerae. Annals Biochem Exp Med. 1963, 23: 523-530.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang W, Wang S, Yu F, Zhang L, Qi G, Liu Y, Gao S, Kan B: Construction and evaluation of a safe, live, oral Vibrio cholerae vaccine candidate, IEM108. Infect Immunity. 2003, 71 (10): 5498-5504. 10.1128/IAI.71.10.5498-5504.2003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu YQ, Qi GM, Wang SX, Yu YM, Duan GC, Zhang LJ, Gao SY: A natural vaccine candidate strain against cholera. Biomed Environ Sci. 1995, 8 (4): 350-358.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chiang SL, Mekalanos JJ: Construction of a Vibrio cholerae vaccine candidate using transposon delivery and FLP recombinase-mediated excision. Infect Immunity. 2000, 68 (11): 6391-6397. 10.1128/IAI.68.11.6391-6397.2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cooper KL, Luey CK, Bird M, Terajima J, Nair GB, Kam KM, Arakawa E, Safa A, Cheung DT, Law CP: Development and validation of a PulseNet standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for subtyping of Vibrio cholerae. Foodborne Pathogens Dis. 2006, 3 (1): 51-58. 10.1089/fpd.2006.3.51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Heidelberg JF, Eisen JA, Nelson WC, Clayton RA, Gwinn ML, Dodson RJ, Haft DH, Hickey EK, Peterson JD, Umayam L: DNA sequence of both chromosomes of the cholera pathogen Vibrio cholerae. Nature. 2000, 406 (6795): 477-483. 10.1038/35020000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Grim CJ, Hasan NA, Taviani E, Haley B, Chun J, Brettin TS, Bruce DC, Detter JC, Han CS, Chertkov O: Genome sequence of hybrid Vibrio cholerae O1 MJ-1236, B-33, and CIRS101 and comparative genomics with V. cholerae. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192 (13): 3524-3533. 10.1128/JB.00040-10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Feng L, Reeves PR, Lan R, Ren Y, Gao C, Zhou Z, Ren Y, Cheng J, Wang W, Wang J: A recalibrated molecular clock and independent origins for the cholera pandemic clones. PloS one. 2008, 3 (12): e4053-10.1371/journal.pone.0004053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Reimer AR, Van Domselaar G, Stroika S, Walker M, Kent H, Tarr C, Talkington D, Rowe L, Olsen-Rasmussen M, Frace M: Comparative genomics of Vibrio cholerae from Haiti, Asia, and Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011, 17 (11): 2113-2121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Garza DR, Thompson CC, Loureiro EC, Dutilh BE, Inada DT, Junior EC, Cardoso JF, Nunes MR, de Lima CP, Silvestre RV: Genome-wide study of the defective sucrose fermenter strain of Vibrio cholerae from the Latin American cholera epidemic. PloS one. 2012, 7 (5): e37283-10.1371/journal.pone.0037283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Perez Chaparro PJ, McCulloch JA, Cerdeira LT, Al-Dilaimi A, de Sa LL C, De Oliveira R, Tauch A, de Carvalho Azevedo VA, Cruz Schneider MP, Da Silva AL: Whole genome sequencing of environmental Vibrio cholerae O1 from 10 nanograms of DNA using short reads. J Microbiol Methods. 2011, 87 (2): 208-212. 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gao Y, Pang B, Wang HY, Zhou HJ, Cui ZG, Kan B: Structural variation of the superintegron in the toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor. Biomed Environ Sci. 2011, 24 (6): 579-592.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang R, Lou J, Liu J, Zhang L, Li J, Kan B: Antibiotic resistance of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor strains from the seventh pandemic in China, 1961–2010. Int J Antimicro Agents. 2012, 40 (4): 361-364. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.06.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dutta B, Ghosh R, Sharma NC, Pazhani GP, Taneja N, Raychowdhuri A, Sarkar BL, Mondal SK, Mukhopadhyay AK, Nandy RK: Spread of cholera with newer clones of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor, serotype inaba, in India. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44 (9): 3391-3393. 10.1128/JCM.00632-06.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Sharifnia A, Bakhshi B, Pourshafie MR: wbeT sequence typing and IS1004 profiling of Vibrio cholerae isolates. Lett Applied Microbiol. 2012, 54 (4): 267-271. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2012.03204.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Faast R, Ogierman MA, Stroeher UH, Manning PA: Nucleotide sequence of the structural gene, tcpA, for a major pilin subunit of Vibrio cholerae. Gene. 1989, 85 (1): 227-231. 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90486-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kimsey HH, Nair GB, Ghosh A, Waldor MK: Diverse CTXphis and evolution of new pathogenic Vibrio cholerae. Lancet. 1998, 352 (9126): 457-458.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Olsvik O, Wahlberg J, Petterson B, Uhlen M, Popovic T, Wachsmuth IK, Fields PI: Use of automated sequencing of polymerase chain reaction-generated amplicons to identify three types of cholera toxin subunit B in Vibrio cholerae O1 strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1993, 31 (1): 22-25.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Jabeen K, Zafar A, Hasan R: Increased isolation of Vibrio cholerae O1 serotype Inaba over serotype Ogawa in Pakistan. East Mediterranean Health J = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit. 2008, 14 (3): 564-570.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30830008 and 81071410) and the National Basic Research Priorities Program (2009CB522604).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biao Kan.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

LW and XZ carried out the molecular genetic studies and participated in the sequence alignment. PL performed gene complementary test. HZ and JZ participated in the PFGE analysis and sequence submission. BK conceived of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. LZ contributed in the strains’ identification and storage. WL participated in the study design and coordination and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Weili Liang, Luxi Wang contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Additional file 1: Table S1: Information of O1 V. cholerae strains used in this study. (DOC 218 KB)


Additional file 2: Figure S1: The rfbT sequence alignment of the mutation sites between the classical and El Tor biotypes. rfbT sequences of all classical biotype strains were included in the analysis. For the El Tor biotype strain, a representative sequence of the Ogawa serotype and each mutation in the Inaba serotype are shown. The dots indicate sequence identity. The nucleotides positions are shown. CVC and EVC represent the classical and El Tor biotype V. cholerae strains, respectively. * indicates the reconstructed rfbT in N16961 was used by removing the insertion sequence of transposase orfAB. (TIFF 1 MB)


Additional file 3: Figure S2: The results of the PFGE analysis using NotI digestion of strains characterized by an 11-bp deletion mutation in rfbT. The dendrogram was produced using the Dice coefficient and the unweighted-pair group method with an arithmetic mean algorithm (UPGMA) with a position tolerance of 1.3%. (TIFF 1 MB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, W., Wang, L., Liang, P. et al. Sequence polymorphisms of rfbT among the Vibrio cholerae O1 strains in the Ogawa and Inaba serotype shifts. BMC Microbiol 13, 173 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Cholera
  • Epidemic Period
  • Cholerae Strain
  • Slide Agglutination Test
  • Cholera Epidemic