Skip to main content

An extracellular Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide: relation to Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin and its implication in phagocytosis



The skin commensal and opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus epidermidis is a leading cause of hospital-acquired and biomaterial-associated infections. The polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA), a homoglycan composed of β-1,6-linked N-acetylglucosamine residues, synthesized by enzymes encoded in icaADBC is a major functional factor in biofilm accumulation, promoting virulence in experimental biomaterial-associated S. epidermidis infection. Extracellular mucous layer extracts of S. epidermidis contain another major polysaccharide, referred to as 20-kDa polysaccharide (20-kDaPS), composed mainly out of glucose, N-acetylglucosamine, and being partially sulfated. 20-kDaPS antiserum prevents adhesion of S. epidermidis on endothelial cells and development of experimental keratitis in rabbits. Here we provide experimental evidence that 20-kDaPS and PIA represent distinct molecules and that 20-kDaPS is implicated in endocytosis of S. epidermidis bacterial cells by human monocyte-derived macrophages.


Analysis of 75 clinical coagulase-negative staphylococci from blood-cultures and central venous catheter tips indicated that 20-kDaPS is expressed exclusively in S. epidermidis but not in other coagulase-negative staphylococcal species. Tn917-insertion in various locations in icaADBC in mutants M10, M22, M23, and M24 of S. epidermidis 1457 are abolished for PIA synthesis, while 20-kDaPS expression appears unaltered as compared to wild-type strains using specific anti-PIA and anti-20-kDaPS antisera. While periodate oxidation and dispersin B treatments abolish immuno-reactivity and intercellular adhesive properties of PIA, no abrogative activity is exerted towards 20-kDaPS immunochemical reactivity following these treatments. PIA polysaccharide I-containing fractions eluting from Q-Sepharose were devoid of detectable 20-kDaPS using specific ELISA. Preincubation of non-20-kDaPS-producing clinical strain with increasing amounts of 20-kDaPS inhibits endocytosis by human macrophages, whereas, preincubation of 20-kDaPS-producing strain ATCC35983 with 20-kDaPS antiserum enhances bacterial endocytosis by human macrophages.


In conclusion, icaADBC is not involved in 20-kDaPS synthesis, while the chemical and chromatographic properties of PIA and 20-kDaPS are distinct. 20-kDaPS exhibits anti-phagocytic properties, whereas, 20-kDaPS antiserum may have a beneficial effect on combating infection by 20-kDaPS-producing S. epidermidis.


Staphylococcus epidermidis and other coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) constitute the most frequent causes of hospital-acquired infections and are often associated with the use of medical devices [1]. Virulence is mainly attributed to surface colonization and biofilm formation [2]. A biofilm represents an adherent, structured, high density community of bacterial cells [3] embedded in an extracellular matrix, previously called slime. Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin (PIA), a homoglycan composed of β-1,6-linked 2-deoxy-2-amino-D-glucopyranosyl residues, is considered to be the major functional component mediating intercellular adhesion in S. epidermidis biofilms [47]. Biofilm formation mediated by PIA is a major virulence factor in experimental biomaterial-associated infection [8] and provides also protection against opsonophagocytosis and activity of anti-microbial peptides [9, 10]. The genes encoding PIA production are organized in the icaADBC operon [1113].

Moreover, a polysaccharide molecule with 20-kDa average molecular mass, defined as 20-kDaPS, was isolated from S. epidermidis ATCC35983 (RP12), ATCC35984 (RP62A) and clinical biofilm-producing strains by ion-exchange chromatography and gel filtration [1416]. Its purity, charge density and molecular integrity have been confirmed by reverse polarity capillary electrophoresis [16]. 20-kDaPS consists mainly of glucose and N-acetylglucosamine, and is partially sulfated. Proposed structure of 20-kDaPS is 30–35 molecules of glucose, 1–3 molecules of xylose and fucose, 61–65 molecules of glucosamine (6–7 N-sulfated) (also perhaps N- acetyl- and/or succinated) and 3–4 molecules of glucuronic acid [14]. This polysaccharide represents 60-65% of total slime carbohydrate and seems to be one of the main antigenic components of slime [17, 18]. Immunization of rabbits with purified 20-kDaPS elicits production of antibodies reacting specifically with 20-kDaPS and biofilm-producing reference strain ATCC35983 (RP12) and other biofilm-producing clinical S. epidermidis strains, but not with other CoNS or S. aureus clinical isolates [19]. Protective value of 20-kDaPS antibodies has been proven in experimental keratitis protocols, where passive and active immunization of rabbits with 20-kDaPS antigen and anti-20-kDaPS exhibit beneficial properties [2022]. Administration of intravenous immunoglobulin preparations with high anti-20-kDaPS titers in preterm neonates reduces risk of bacteraemia caused by biofilm-producing S. epidermidis[23]. Finally, experimental data suggest that 20-kDaPS is associated with attachment of S. epidermidis to endothelial cells [24].

Several other polysaccharide molecules have been associated with biofilm accumulation or initial adherence on surfaces, such as PS/A (Capsular Polysaccharide Adhesin) or PNSG (Poly N-Succinyl Glucosamine), finally defined as PNAG [2528], and SAA (Slime Associated Antigen) [29, 30]. As other polysaccharide molecules associated with S. epidermidis’ pathogenesis turned out to be identical or related to PIA [3136], the aim of this study was to define the relation of 20-kDaPS and PIA using isogenic mutants with Tn917-insertions in various locations in icaADBC, specific antisera and specific glycosidase and chemical treatments. In addition, in vitro experiments were conducted exploring 20-kDaPS biological interference in phagocytosis by human macrophages.


Detection of 20-kDaPS, PIA expression and icaADBC-genotype in clinical CoNS isolates

Among fifty (50) clinical S. epidermidis strains, eighteen (36%) were found ica+ biofilm+ 20-kDaPS+, ten (20%) ica- biofilm- 20-kDaPS-, six (12%) ica+ biofilm- 20-kDaPS+, six (12%) ica- biofilm- 20-kDaPS+, five (10%) ica+ biofilm- 20-kDaPS- and five (10%) strains ica+ biofilm+ 20-kDaPS-. All other CoNS (n = 25) were ica- biofilm- 20-kDaPS-. All ica+ biofilm+S. epidermidis strains were PIA-positive by specific immunofluorescence test, whereas, ica- biofilm- or ica+ biofilm- strains were PIA-negative. In our S. epidermidis strain collection, 46% (n = 23) were PIA positive and 60% (n = 30) were 20-kDaPS positive. IcaADBC prevalence in our collection was 68%, whereas 46% of S. epidermidis strains were biofilm-producing. 20-kDaPS expression among ica+S. epidermidis strains was 70% (24 ica+ 20-kDaPS+ amongst 34 ica+S. epidermidis strains), whereas, 20-kDaPS expression among ica- strains was 37% (6 ica- 20-kDaPS+ amongst 16 ica-S. epidermidis strains). 20-kDaPS expression in relation to biofilm formation reveals that 78% of biofilm-producing S. epidermidis strains expressed 20-kDaPS (18 biofilm+ 20-kDaPS+ in 23 biofilm+S. epidermidis strains), whereas, 44% of biofilm-negative strains were 20-kDaPS positive (12 biofilm- 20-kDaPS+ of 27 biofilm-S. epidermidis strains). These results show that the majority of clinical S. epidermidis isolates express 20-kDaPS and that there is no strict correlation of icaADBC-genotype or biofilm phenotype and expression of 20-kDaPS.

Expression of 20-kDaPS and PIA by S. epidermidis strains with known genetic backgrounds

Using an indirect immunofluorescence test with specific anti-PIA antiserum S. epidermidis strains 1457, 8400, and 9142 were shown to express PIA, while the isogenic icaA-insertion mutants 1457-M10, M24 and 8400-M10 and isogenic icaC-insertion mutants M22 and M23 did not express PIA. Similarly, S. epidermidis 5179, 5179R1 and 1585 did not synthesize PIA as in the former two strains icaADBC is inactivated through insertion of IS257[37], while 1585 is icaADBC-negative. Using specific anti-20-kDaPS antiserum S. epidermidis 1457, 1457-M10, M22, M23, M24, 8400, 8400-M10, 9142, 5179, 5179R1 were 20-kDaPS positive, whereas, S. epidermidis strain 1585 was 20-kDaPS negative. A representative immunofluorescence test with anti-PIA and anti-20-kDaPS antisera, comparing S. epidermidis 1457 and 1457-M10, is displayed in Figure 1. An identical expression pattern of 20-kDaPS was independently demonstrated for these strains using specific ELISA, excluding that there are significant quantitative differences in 20-kDaPS antigen expression between the isogenic mutant strain pairs (Figure 2). 20-kDaPS detection in transposon mutants of S. epidermidis 1457-M10, M22, M23, M24 is shown in Figure 3. Inactivation of icaA in mutant 1457-M10 and of icaC in mutants M22 and M23 lead to biofilm negative and PIA negative phenotype, but did not alter 20-kDaPS antigen detection. The fact that mutant M24, where the transposon is oriented in the opposite transcriptional direction than the icaADBC operon and no ica specific transcript can be identified, still expressed 20-kDaPS provide clear proof that 20-kDaPS synthesis is independent of the icaADBC operon.

Figure 1
figure 1

Immunofluorescence detection of PIA and 20-kDaPS on reference strains. Immunofluorescence detection of PIA (a, c) and 20-kDaPS (b, d) on S. epidermidis 1457 (a, b) and icaA-insertion mutant S. epidermidis 1457-M10 (c, d), grown in TSB medium, utilizing PIA and 20-kDaPS specific rabbit antisera, respectively.

Figure 2
figure 2

20-kDaPS expression in reference strains. Microtiter plates were coated with bacterial suspensions (absorbance578 =1.0) diluted 1:10 and 1:30, respectively, in PBS and incubated with 20-kDaPS antiserum at a 1:3,000 dilution. Results represent mean absorbance values ± SDs for two independent experiments performed in triplicate.

Figure 3
figure 3

Immunofluorescence detection of 20-kDaPS on selected strains. Immunofluorescence detection of 20-kDaPS on S. epidermidis (a) 1505, (b) 1457, (c) 1457-M10, (d) M22, (e) M23 and (f) M24. Scale bar stands for 10 μm.

Influence of chemical and enzymatic treatments on antigen detection by immunofluorescence and on biofilm integrity

Periodate oxidation led to abolishment of antigenic reactivity of PIA, whereas 20-kDaPS preserved its antigenic properties (Figures 4e and 4f). Treatment with dispersin B (DspB) completely destroyed antigenic reactivity of PIA within one hour of incubation. DspB is a hexosaminidase (β-N-acetylglucosaminidase) produced by the oral pathogen Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, which specifically cleaves β-1,6-linked N-acetylglucosamine polymer disrupting PIA chain [38, 39]. In contrast, DspB does not alter 20-kDaPS antigenic properties (Figures 4g and 4h). Parallel to PIA destruction, biofilm structure is disrupted after periodate oxidation and DspB treatments and large clumps are substituted by small clumps or single and double cells, still detectable by anti-20-kDaPS antiserum (Figure 4). Finally, the fact that PIA and 20-kDaPS retain their antigenic properties after proteinase K digestion is consistent with their polysaccharide nature (Figures 4c and 4d). Integrity of biofilm, formed on 96-well cell culture plates, to treatment with proteinase K, sodium meta-periodate and DspB was also studied. All biofilms were susceptible to sodium meta-periodate and DspB, whereas, addition of proteinase K did not affect biofilm stability. Thus, biofilm production in our strain collection is mediated mainly through PIA, as was shown in other studies [4042]. In addition, 20-kDaPS presence does not relate to biofilm formation as agents, such as sodium meta-periodate and DspB that destroy biofilm integrity, do not affect antigenic properties of 20-kDaPS.

Figure 4
figure 4

Influence of proteinase K, periodate and DspB treatments on PIA and 20-kDaPS. Immunofluorescence detection of PIA (a, c, e, g) and 20-kDaPS (b, d, f, h) on S. epidermidis 1457 grown as biofilm (a, b) after treatment with proteinase K (c, d), sodium meta-periodate (e, f) and DspB (g, h).

Lack of co-purification of 20-kDaPS with PIA polysaccharide I in Q-Sepharose anion-exchange chromatography

Clarified crude bacterial extracts obtained after bacterial sonication were tested for presence of PIA and 20-kDaPS reactivity by ELISA using anti-PIA and anti-20-kDaPS rabbit antisera, respectively (Figure 5). Under the conditions employed, in the crude extract consistently higher absorbance values were obtained with the 20-kDaPS specific antiserum as compared to the anti-PIA specific antiserum. The crude extract was applied to a Q-Sepharose column as described in Materials and Methods. Under these conditions the majority of PIA (approx. 80%) did not bind to the columns, but was immediately eluted. This PIA antigen fraction is referred to as polysaccharide I of PIA [4]. However, in the fractions representing the PIA antigenic peak reactivity with the specific anti-20-kDaPS antiserum was negligible indicating that 20-kDaPS does not co-purify with polysaccharide I of PIA. Additionally, this excludes significant cross reactivity of the 20-kDaPS antiserum with epitopes present on PIA.

Figure 5
figure 5

PIA and 20-kDaPS detection in clarified bacterial extracts and Q-Sepharose eluted fractions. PIA and 20-kDaPS detection in clarified bacterial extracts diluted 1:500 (a) and 1:2,000 (b) and Q-Sepharose column fractions (1–15) diluted 1:20. PIA and 20-kDaPS rabbit antisera were used at 1:800 and 1:3,000 dilutions, respectively. Presented data represent mean absorbance values ± SDs for two independent experiments performed in triplicate.

PIA and 20-kDaPS antisera do not cross-react with each-other

In order to identify any cross reactivity among 20-kDaPS antiserum and PIA antigen and vice versa, absorption studies were performed. PIA-specific antiserum was absorbed by S. epidermidis 1457 (PIA+ 20-kDaPS+) strain, as described in Methods. Absorbed antiserum was incubated with 1457 on immunofluorescence slides and achievement of complete absorption was confirmed. Furthermore, absorbed antiserum did not detect PIA on RP12 (PIA+ 20-kDaPS+), 1477 (PIA+ 20-kDaPS+) and 1510 (PIA+ 20-kDaPS-) S. epidermidis strains. PIA-specific antiserum was also absorbed by S. epidermidis 1510 (PIA+ 20-kDaPS-) and immunofluorescence tests performed with S. epidermidis RP12, 1457 and 1477. No remaining anti-PIA reactivity was observed with any strain using the absorbed antiserum. Finally, PIA-specific antiserum absorbed with S. epidermidis 1522 (PIA- 20-kDaPS+) retains all reactivity to S. epidermidis 1457, RP12 and 1477 strains. In case that PIA antiserum reacted - even weakly - with 20-kDaPS antigen, incubation of PIA antiserum with strain 1522 bearing 20-kDaPS antigen, would lead to absorption of anti-PIA antibodies and no anti-PIA reactivity would remain. A selection of analogous experiments was performed regarding anti-20kDaPS serum, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Cross absorption experiment

Synthesis of 20-kDaPS and PIA in different culture media

In order to explore possible polysaccharide synthesis dependence on certain constituents of culture media, 20-kDaPS and PIA presence upon prolonged culture in different culture media was studied. 20-kDaPS expression was not abolished after long time incubation of bacteria in any of the selected media (RPMI1640, RPMI1640 + glutamine, IMDM, TSB, TSB w/o dextrose and on blood agar plates). 20-kDaPS antiserum revealed strong reactivity to bacterial cells growing in all media with the exception of TSB w/o dextrose where only a percentage of bacterial cells express 20-kDaPS. Regarding PIA synthesis, TSB seems superior to RPMI 1640, RPMI 1640 + glutamine and IMDM upon prolonged consecutive subcultures, whereas PIA expression was almost abolished in TSB lacking dextrose, in accordance to previous reports [7]. In addition, PIA presence was strongly associated to biofilm formation. Biofilms formed in RPMI1640, RPMI1640 + glutamine and IMDM were more susceptible to mechanic disruption following agitation by vortex and disintegration into small clumps (Table 2).

Table 2 Immunofluorescence upon prolonged culture in different chemically defined media

Impact of 20-kDaPS on bacterial endocytosis

Differences in phagocytosis between S. epidermidis reference strain ATCC35983 and the clinical 20-kDaPS negative strain 1505 were observed (48,300 ± 2,400 cfu vs 68,800 ± 4,700 cfu, respectively, p < 0.05). Phagocytosis experiments were performed without addition of exogenous complement. Preincubation of non-20kDaPS-producing strain with different concentrations of 20-kDaPS inhibits endocytosis (Figure 6). Specifically, preincubation of non-20kDaPS-producing strain with 20-kDaPS (0, 15, 30, 60, 180 μg/mL) reduces the number of endocytosed bacteria from 76,500 ± 7,400 to 54,000 ± 1,300, 40,000 ± 2,271, 9,100 ± 2,193, 4,100 ± 793 bacteria/well, respectively. Differences are statistically significant in all above 20-kDaPS concentrations.Inhibition of endocytosis takes place at a dose dependent manner between 0 and 60 μg/mL (Figure 7). On the contrary, 20-kDaPS antiserum increases endocytosis of 20-kDaPS-producing ATCC35983 strain ca 10 fold, as compared to bacteria preincubated with preimmune serum (516,800 ± 52,500 cfu vs 52,800 ± 28,800, p < 0.005). Preincubation with preimmune antiserum did not alter endocytosis, as compared to bacteria preincubated with PBS (48,300 ± 2,400 cfu vs 52,800 ± 28,800 cfu). In terms of S. epidermidis clinical isolate 1505, preincubation with preimmune antiserum seems to enhance endocytosis, as compared to bacteria preincubated with PBS (101,600 ± 10,400 vs 68,800 ± 8,700 cfu, respectively, p < 0.05), but preincubation with 20-kDaPS antiserum does not further increase endocytosis, as compared to bacteria preincubated with preimmune serum (98,300 ± 17,900 cfu vs 101,600 ± 10,400 cfu, p > 0.05). This phenomenon may be associated with the presence of other anti-staphylococcal antibodies in rabbit serum. Prior to immunization, rabbit serum was collected and tested by ELISA for reactivity to 20-kDaPS in order to exclude pre-existence of 20-kDaPS specific antibodies. Low titers of antibodies to various staphylococcal strains, S. epidermidis and S. aureus, are present in preimmune serum (data not shown) and may be responsible for the observed effect. A representative experiment of five similar ones is presented in Figure 8.

Figure 6
figure 6

Impact of 20-kDaPS on endocytosis of S. epidermidis by human macrophages. Bacterial suspensions of non-20-kDaPS producing S. epidermidis clinical strain, preincubated with different concentrations of 20-kDaPS, were added to human macrophages. The number of endocytosed bacteria was counted by serial dilutions of cell lysates on blood agar. All experiments were repeated five times.

Figure 7
figure 7

20-kDaPS inhibits endocytosis of S. epidermidis in a dose-dependent manner. Standard curve obtained by counting the number of endocytosed bacteria preincubating with increasing amounts of 20-kDaPS (0, 15, 30, 60 mg/L) (y = −1096x + 73675, R2 = 0.99.

Figure 8
figure 8

Impact of 20-kDaPS antiserum on endocytosis of S. epidermidis by human macrophages. Bacterial suspensions of 20-kDaPS-producing S. epidermidis reference strain ATCC35983 and non-20-kDaPS producing S. epidermidis clinical strain 1505 preincubated with PBS (ctl), preimmune serum (preI), and 20-kDaPS antiserum (I) were added to human macrophages. The number of endocytosed bacteria was counted by serial dilutions of cell lysates on blood agar. Columns represent mean values of endocytosed bacteria from a representative experiment out of five similar ones performed in triplicate. (*) p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.005, (NS) p > 0.05.


Staphylococcus epidermidis is an important pathogen [43] and extracellular polysaccharides as well as a number of surface proteins contributing to bacterial attachment and biofilm formation have been extensively studied. Analysis of S. epidermidis’ polysaccharides has been associated with difficulties, however, it is now clear that, despite some possible variation, PIA, and other analogue polysaccharides such as PS/A, PNSG, PNAG, and SAA are chemically closely related if not identical and represent the same chemical entity, namely PIA. This is the first time shown that 20-kDaPS is discrete from PIA and this statement is based on concrete basis.

Transposon insertion in icaADBC, the locus encoding synthetic enzymes for PIA synthesis, does not abrogate production of 20-kDaPS. In mutant 1457-M10 in which Tn917 was inserted in icaA in the same transcriptional orientation, outward directed transcription resulted in transcripts comprising the complete sequences of icaD icaB and icaC[44]. Expression of 20-kDaPS in mutant 1457-M10 where icaA synthesis is inhibited and in mutant M22 and M3 where icaC expression was inhibited shows that 20-kDaPS synthesis does not require an intact icaA or icaC gene. The fact that 20-kDaPS was detected in M24, where Tn917 was inserted in the opposite transcriptional direction to the ica operon and no-ica specific transcripts were identified [44], provides evidence that 20-kDaPS synthesis is independent of ica operon. In contrast, PIA synthesis is completely inhibited not only by the disruption of the entire icaADBC operon but also by the isolated inhibition of icaA (M10) and icaC (M22, M23) gene expression.

Proteinase K does not disrupt antigenic properties of 20-kDaPS reconfirming its polysaccharide nature. Furthermore, DspB, which specifically cleaves β-1,6-linked N-acetylglucosamine polymer disrupting PIA chain [38, 39], did not affect 20-kDaPS. Although sodium meta-periodate is an agent commonly used to disrupt polysaccharide molecules, it did not affect integrity of 20-kDaPS antigen. Taking into account that periodate preferably degrades cis-diols, it is suggested that monomeric units of the polysaccharide core form glycosidic bonds between the anomeric C-1 and the C-3 or C-4. This is not the case for PIA, where a β-1,6-glycosidic bond is present leaving free vicinal hydroxyl groups of glucosamine at C-3 and C-4. The above structural data suggest that 20-kDa PS and PIA are two discrete and different polysaccharides. Preliminary data in our laboratories showed that 20-kDaPS is not affected upon treatment with glycosaminoglycan- degrading enzymes (heparin lyases, keratanases and chondroitinases), suggesting a non glycosaminoglycan-related structure.

Absence of 20-kDaPS in Q-Sepharose fractions containing maximum PIA reactivity is due to different physicochemical properties among the two molecules. Q-Sepharose is a strong anion-exchanger which retains negatively charged molecules. Whereas PIA is eluting, 20-kDaPS may be strongly retained by the column due to its negative charges. Aforementioned differentiation was expected as different isolation procedures are used for the two polysaccharides. As previously described [16, 19], 20-kDaPS is obtained from bacterial extracellular matrix using a linear NaCl gradient on DEAE-Sephacel and elutes at 0.5-0.7 M NaCl.

Presented data suggest that 20-kDaPS inhibits endocytosis of S. epidermidis bacterial cells at a dose-dependent manner. Similarly, PIA provides protection against opsonophagocytosis and activity of anti-microbial peptides [9, 10]. In the absence of specific opsonizing antibodies, macrophages are able to clear pathogens by innate immune receptors, such as the group of molecular pattern recognition receptors (PRR), collectively known as scavenger receptors [45]. 20-kDaPS may interfere with or mask staphylococcal antigen(s) promoting phagocytosis [46]; on the other hand, it may interact with a receptor that does not facilitate phagocytosis. Adhesion receptors and phagocytosis receptors can both activate and inhibit each other functions [47]. It has been previously shown that 20-kDaPS promotes adhesion to human endothelial cells and this interaction is blocked upon addition of anti-20kDaPS antibodies. Comparable data were acquired by using human macrophages (data not shown), indicating the presence of a specific ligand for 20-kDaPS on human cells. Adherence of unopsonized bacteria to macrophages does not preclude internalization [4851]. Nonopsonic binding of pathogens to host phagocytic cells may not always result in phagocytosis, however, it may serve an important role in the immune response [52]

Nevertheless, phagocytic activity of macrophages is greatly enhanced if specific antibodies are attached to the pathogen [53]. 20-kDaPS antiserum do not exhibit any cross reactivity with PIA. Antibodies against PNSG and PIA have been found completely cross-reactive [31]. As 20-kDaPS antiserum reacts specifically and strictly with 20-kDaPS, observed biologic properties concern exclusively this entity. Our data show that 20-kDaPS antiserum exhibits opsonic properties as it increases endocytosis of S. epidermidis ATCC35983 by human macrophages. Several surface molecules have been studied as potential antibody targets in order to enhance phagocytic potential of monocytes/macrophages. Opsonic activity of antibodies to S. epidermidis Fbe and AtlE has been demonstrated in a study where fresh alveolar macrophages from rat ingested and killed S. epidermidis opsonized with anti-Fbe antibodies (raised in rabbit, rat or sheep) to a much higher extent than they ingested and killed nonopsonized bacteria or bacteria opsonized with antibodies directed against AtlE or Embp [53]. Also, a chimerized (murine/human) monoclonal antibody against lipoteichoic acid that was proven protective for CoNS and S. aureus bacteremia in animal models has been also tested to humans [54]. In contrast, antibodies to accumulation-associated protein and lipoteichoic acid had no opsonic activity in vitro and did not protect mice against experimental biomaterial-associated infections [55]. Although, conjugate vaccines based on PIA/PNAG have been shown to be beneficial in animal models [5660], several doubts for their use in human trials have been documented [61, 62]. Thus, more and extensive investigations are needed to evaluate the potential use of 20-kDaPS in conjugate vaccines.


This is the first study providing concrete data that 20-kDaPS is a unique polysaccharide molecule discrete from PIA. 20-kDaPS exhibits antiphagocytic properties that may be shown to play a role in pathogenicity. Further work is in progress to establish a role in conjugate vaccine development.


Bacterial strains

Two reference S. epidermidis strains, ATCC35983 (RP12) and ATCC35984 (RP62A) were used in the present study. Biofilm-producing, PIA-positive S. epidermidis strains 1457, 9142, 8400, and isogenic biofilm-negative, PIA-negative transposon mutants 1457-M10, M22, M23, M24 and 8400-M10 with Tn917 insertion in the icaADBC operon have been described. In mutants 1457-M10 and M24, Tn917 inserted in icaA whereas in M22 and M23 the transposon inserted in icaC[6, 7, 31, 42, 63]. The transposon was oriented in the same transcriptional direction as the icaADBC operon in all mutants except for M24 in which the transposon inserted in the opposite direction. Also, biofilm-negative, PIA-negative S. epidermidis strains 5179 and 1585 as well as biofilm-positive, PIA-negative variant 5179-R1 were used [7, 64, 65] (see also Table 3).

Table 3 S. epidermidis reference and clinical strains used in the present study

Seventy-five clinical CoNS isolates from blood cultures and central venous catheter tips collected in the Clinical Laboratory of General University Hospital of Patras, Greece, were used in the present study (50 S. epidermidis, 12 S. haemolyticus, 9 S. hominis, 1 S. cohnii, 1 S. xylosus, 1 S. capitis, 1 S. lugdunensis). Clinical strains were identified at the species level (API Staph ID 32 cards and automated VITEK system, BioMerieux) and tested for the presence of icaA icaD1 icaD2 icaC by PCR [6668]. Ability of clinical strains for biofilm formation was assessed quantitatively on microtiter plates, as previously described [7, 69, 70].


Specific PIA antiserum raised in rabbits against purified polysaccharide I of PIA and specific 20-kDaPS antiserum raised in rabbits against purified 20-kDaPS has been previously described [4, 19, 70].

Specific antigen detection by immunofluorescence

Detection of 20-kDaPS and PIA by immunofluorescence was performed, as previously described [7, 70]. Briefly, overnight cultures of S. epidermidis strains in TSB were diluted 1:100 in 2 mL fresh medium and incubated for 18 h at 37°C with shaking. After brief vortex, bacterial suspensions were adjusted to approximate absorbance578 0.2 (Spectrophotometer, Novaspec Plus) and aliquots (10 μL per well) were applied to immunofluorescence slides (CA Hendley Essex Ltd, Essex, United Kingdom). Slide preparations were air-dried, fixed with cold acetone and stored at 4°C until use. Aliquots (20 μL per field) PIA or 20-kDaPS antisera diluted 1:50 in PBS were applied to slides which were incubated for 30 min at 37°C. After washing three times with PBS, 10 μL of fluorescein-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Sigma, UK) diluted 1:80 in phosphate buffered saline were applied, and slides were incubated for 30 min at 37°C. After washing, they were mounted using Vectashield and viewed with a Zeiss AxioImager fluorescence microscope fitted with an AxioCam MR3 camera.

Specific antigen detection by ELISA

ELISA for polysaccharide detection was performed as previously described [17]. Briefly, antigens, bacterial cells or polysaccharide, were applied on a 96-well flat bottom high binding ELISA plate (Greiner) and incubated overnight at 4°C. Afterwards, plates were blocked by BSA and incubated with 20-kDaPS or PIA antisera for 1 h at 37°C. Peroxidase H-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma Chemical Company, St Louis, MO, USA), diluted 1:2,000 was added for 1 h. Color was developed by adding 100 μL/well SureBlue TMB Microwell Peroxidase Substrate (KPL). After incubation for 15 min at room temperature in the absence of light, the reaction was terminated with 100 μL/well of 1 M H2SO4 and measured at absorbance450. ELISA was also performed, as previously described, on 96-well tissue culture plates (Nunc) with similar results.

PIA isolation

Isolation of PIA antigen was performed, as previously described [6], with slight modification. Briefly, S. epidermidis 1457 was grown for 22 h at 37°C with shaking at 100 rpm/min in 900 mL of TSBdia, prepared by dialysis of 100 mL of 10-fold-concentrated TSB against 900 mL of water. Bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation and were suspended in 20 mL of PBS. The antigen was extracted by sonicating cells four times for 30 sec on ice (Branson Digital Sonifier). Cells were removed by centrifugation at 6,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C, and extracts were clarified by centrifugation for 60 min at 12,000 rpm. The extracts (20 mL) were filter sterilized, dialyzed against 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, overnight, concentrated by using Centriprep 10 (Amicon, Witten), applied to PD-10 Q-Sepharose column (Sigma) equilibrated with 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, and fractions of 1.5 mL were collected.

Influence of proteinase K, sodium meta-periodate and dispersin B treatments on antigen integrity and biofilm stability

Overnight cultures of different S. epidermidis strains in TSB were diluted 1:100 in 5 mL fresh TSB and incubated in 6-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates (Nunc) for additional 16–18 h at 37°C. Supernatants were removed and biofilms were detached using a cell scraper and suspended in 2 mL PBS. After brief vortex bacterial suspensions were adjusted to absorbance578 0.2. Aliquots of bacterial cultures (200 μL) were supplemented with 40 μL of 0.2 M sodium meta-periodate (Sigma), 2 μL of 100 μg/mL proteinase K (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 2 μL of 1 mg/mL DspB and incubated at 4°C for 16 h, 37°C for 16 h and 37°C for 1 h and 5 h, respectively. Samples were applied onto immunofluorescence slides at appropriate dilution and immunofluorescence tests performed as described above. For testing the stability of established biofilms, bacteria were grown overnight in 96-well cell tissue culture plates (Nunc) as described above. Medium was removed and PBS containing proteinase K (1 μg/mL) or DspB (10 μg/mL) or sodium meta-periodate (0.04 M) was added for 16 h at 37°C and at 4°C for sodium meta-periodate. Disruption of biofilm integrity was evaluated by assessment the absorbance at 570 nm.

Absorption of antiserum

20-kDaPS and PIA antiserum were absorbed, as previously described [7], with slight modification. In brief, overnight cultures of selected strains were diluted 1:100 in TSB and incubated with shaking at 100 rpm for 18 h. Bacteria were harvested, washed two times in PBS and resuspended in PBS (absorbance578 =2). Aliquots of this bacterial preparation (50 μL) were incubated with one μL of the respective antiserum diluted in 450 μL PBS overnight at 4°C on a rotating wheel. Bacterial cells were removed by centrifuging twice at 12,000 × g for 15 min in a mini-centrifuge and the supernatants were filter sterilized.

Antigen expression upon bacterial culture in chemically defined media

S. epidermidis strains 1457, 1457-M10, and RP12 were subcultured daily for ten days in the following chemically defined broth media: RPMI1640, RPMI1640 + glutamine, IMDM, (Gibco, Invitrogen Life Science), TSB, TSB w/o dextrose and on blood agar plates. 20-kDaPS and PIA expression was assessed by immunofluorescence on day 1, 4, 7 and 10.

Human monocyte derived macrophages

Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from buffy coats by density centrifugation on Ficoll density gradient (Biochrom AG, Berlin) and incubated for 2 h in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Biochrom AG, Berlin) and 2 mM L-Glutamine (HyClone) in 75 cm2 tissue culture flasks (Sarstedt Inc, Newton, NC, USA) at 37o C in a humidified, 5% CO2 atmosphere. Afterwards, non adherent cells were discarded and adherent cells were collected with a cell scraper. Monocytes were differentiated to macrophages after 7 days culture in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented by Gentamicin, Penicillin-Streptomycin (Gibco, Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA), 10% heat-inactivated human AB serum (Invitrogen, USA), 2 mM L-Glutamine and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (10 ng/mL; Abcam, UK). Experimental work using human blood mononuclear cells carried out after obtaining written informed consent of healthy blood donors and was approved by the University of Patras Bioethics Committee.

Bacterial endocytosis

In order to assess the impact of 20-kDaPS on S. epidermidis endocytosis, one hundred microliters of a non-20-kDaPS-producing clinical strain (strain 1505) (2 × 108 bacteria/mL) were incubated at room temperature with increasing concentrations (0, 15, 30, 60 μg/mL) of 20-kDaPS. In order to assess the impact of 20-kDaPS antiserum on S. epidermidis endocytosis, 100 μL of 20-kDaPS-producing strain ATCC35983 and 100 μL of non-20-kDaPS-producing clinical strain (2 × 108 bacteria/mL) were incubated at room temperature with PBS, preimmune antiserum and 20-kDaPS antiserum for one h. Afterwards, bacterial suspensions were centrifuged at 12000 × g for ten minutes and further washed with PBS. This procedure was repeated three times. Finally, bacteria were resuspended in PBS at final concentration of 2 × 107 bacteria/mL. Two hundred thousand (2 × 105) macrophages in 0.5 mL RPMI1640 were incubated with 2 × 106 bacteria preincubated with 20-kDaPS in different concentrations, preimmune antiserum, 20-kDaPS antiserum or PBS at 37°C for one h. Then, 10 μL lysostaphin (1 mg/mL) was added for 15 min and cells were washed with PBS. Absence of live extracellular bacteria was confirmed by absence of growth on blood agar. Cells were lysed by 0.1% Triton X-100 and viable intracellular bacteria were counted by plating serial dilutions of the lysates on blood agar plates. Experiments were performed at least five times in triplicate using macrophages from different donors.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17 statistical package (SPSS Inc, USA). Differences were evaluated using paired t test.


  1. 1.

    Vuong C, Otto M: Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. Microbes Infect. 2002, 4: 481-489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Von Eiff C, Peters G, Heilmann C: Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002, 2: 677-685.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mack D, Davies A, Harris L, Rohde H, Horstkotte M, Knobloch J: Microbial interactions in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007, 387: 399-408.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mack D, Fischer W, Krokotsch A, Leopold K, Hartmann R, Egge H, Laufs R: The Intercellular Adhesin Involved in Biofilm Accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis Is a Linear β-1,6-Linked Glucosaminoglucan: Purification and Structural Analysis. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 175-183.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mack D, Haeder M, Siemssen N, Laufs R: Association of biofilm production of coagulase-negative staphylococci with expression of a specific polysaccharide intercellular adhesion. J Infect Dis. 1996, 174: 881-884.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mack D, Nedelmann M, Krokotsch A, Schwarzkopf A, Heesemann J, Laufs R: Characterization of Transposon Mutants of Biofilm-Producing Staphylococcus epidermidis Impaired in the Accumulative Phase of Biofilm Production: Genetic Identification of a Hexosamine-Containing Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin. Infect Immun. 1994, 62: 3244-3254.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mack D, Siemssen N, Laufs R: Parallel Induction of Glucose of Adherence and a Polysaccharide Antigen Specific for Plastic-Adherent Staphylococcus epidermidis: Evidence for Functional Relation to Intercellular Adhesion. Infect Immun. 1992, 60: 2048-2057.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rupp M, Ulphani JS, Fey PD, Mack D: Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin/Hemagglutinin in the Pathogenesis of Intravascular Catheter-Associated Infection in a Rat Model. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 2656-2659.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Vuong C, Voyich JM, Fischer ER, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, DeLeon FR, Otto M: Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) protects Staphylococcus epidermidis against major components of the human innate immune system. Cell Microbiol. 2004, 6: 269-275.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kristian SA, Birkenstock TA, Sauder U, Mack D, Götz F, Landmann R: Biofilm formation induces C3a release and protects Staphylococcus epidermidis from IgG and complement deposition and from neutrophil-dependent killing. J Infect Dis. 2008, 197: 1028-1035.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Heilmann C, Schweitzer O, Gerke C, Vanittanakom N, Mack D, Götz F: Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 20: 1083-1091.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Heilmann C, Gerke , Perdreau-Remington F, Gotz F: Characterization of Tn917 insertion mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis affected in biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 1996, 64: 277-282.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gerke C, Kraft A, Suβmuth R, Schweitzer O, Gotz F: Characterization of the N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase Activity Involved in the Biosynthesis of the Staphylococcus epidermidis Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin. J Biol Chem. 1996, 273: 18586-18593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Arvaniti A, Karamanos NK, Dimitracopoulos G, Anastassiou ED: Isolation and Characterization of a Novel 20-kDa Sulfated Polysaccharide from the Extracellular Slime Layer of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994, 308: 432-438.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Karamanos NK, Panagiotopoulou HS, Syrokou A, Frangides C, Hjerpe A, Dimitracopoulos G, Anastassiou ED: Identity of macromolecules present in the extracellular slime layer of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Biochimie. 1995, 77: 217-224.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Krevvata MI, Afratis N, Spiliopoulou A, Malavaki CJ, Kolonitsiou F, Anastassiou E, Karamanos NK: A modified protocol for isolation and purity evaluation of a staphylococcal acidic polysaccharide by chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. Biomed Chromatogr. 2010, 25: 531-534.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kolonitsiou F, Syrokou A, Karamanos NK, Anastassiou ED, Dimitracopoulos G: Immunoreactivity of 80-kDa peptidoglycan and teichoic acid-like substance of slime-producing S. epidermidis and specificity of their antibodies studied by an enzyme immunoassay. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2001, 24: 429-436.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lamari FN, Anastassiou ED, Kolonitsiou F, Dimitracopoulos G, Karamanos NK: Potential use of solid phase immunoassays in the diagnosis of coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2004, 34: 803-810.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Karamanos NK, Syrokou A, Panagiotopoulou HS, Anastassiou ED, Dimitracopoulos G: The Major 20-kDa Polysaccharide of Staphylococcus epidermidis Extracellular Slime and Its Antibodies as Powerful Agents for Detecting Antibodies in Blood Serum and Differentiating among Slime-Positive and –Negative S. epidermidis and other Staphylococci species. Arch Bioch Biophys. 1997, 342: 389-395.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Georgakopoulos CG, Exarchou AM, Gartaganis SP, Kolonitsiou F, Anastassiou ED, Dimitracopoulos G, Hjerpe A, Theocharis AD, Karamanos NK: Immunization with Specific Polysaccharide Antigen Reduces Alterations in Corneal Proteoglycans During Experimental Slime-Producing Staphylococcus epidermidis Keratitis. Curr Eye Res. 2006, 31: 137-146.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Georgakopoulos CG, Exarchou AM, Koliopoulos JX, Gartaganis SP, Anastassiou ED, Kolonitsiou F, Lamari F, Karamanos NK, Dimitracopoulos G: Levels of specific antibodies towards the major antigenic determinant of slime-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis determined by an enzyme immunoassay and their protective effect in experimental keratitis. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2002, 29: 255-262.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Petropoulos IK, Vantzou CV, Lamari FN, Karamanos NK, Anastassiou ED, Pharmakakis NM: Expression of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IFN-gamma in Staphylococcus epidermidis slime-positive experimental endophthalmitis is closely related to clinical inflammatory scores. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006, 244: 1322-1328.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lamari F, Anastassiou ED, Stamokosta E, Photopoulos S, Xanthou M, Dimitracopoulos G, Karamanos NK: Determination of slime-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis specific antibodies in human immunoglobulin preparations and blood sera by an enzyme immunoassay. Correlation of antibody titers with opsonic activity and application to preterm neonates. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2000, 23: 363-374.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Krevvata MI, Spiliopoulou A, Anastassiou ED, Karamanos NK, Kolonitsiou F: Adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to human endothelial cells is associated to a polysaccharidic component of its extracellular mucous layer. Connect Tissue Res. 2011, 52: 183-189.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tojo M, Yamashita N, Goldmann DA, Pier GB: Isolation and characterization of a capsular polysaccharide adhesin from Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Infect Dis. 1998, 157: 713-722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    McKenney D, Hubner J, Muller E, Wang Y, Goldmann D, Pier G: The ica Locus of Staphylococcus epidermidis Encodes Production of the Capsular Polysaccharide/Adhesin. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 4711-4720.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    McKenney D, Pouliot K, Wang Y, Murphy V, Urlich M, Doring G, Lee JC, Goldmann DA, Pier GB: Vaccine potential of poly-1-6-β-D-N-succinylglucosamine, an immunoprotective surface of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Biotechnol. 2000, 83: 37-44.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Maira-Litran T, Kropec A, Abeygunawardana C, Joyce J, Mark G, Goldmann DA, Pier GB: Immunochemical Properties of the Staphylococcal Poly-N-Acetylglucosamine Surface Polysaccharide. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 4433-4440.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Christensen GD, Barker LP, Mawhinney TP, Baddour LM, Simpson WA: Identification of an Antigenic Marker of Slime Production for Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect Immun. 1990, 58: 2906-2911.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Baldassarri L, Donnelli G, Gelosia A, Voglino MC, Simpson AW, Christensen GD: Purification and Characterization of the Staphylococcal Slime-Associated Antigen and Its Occurrence among Staphylococcus epidermidis Clinical Isolates. Infect Immun. 1996, 64: 3410-3415.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gotz F: Staphylococcus and biofilms. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 43: 1367-1378.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mack D, Riedewald J, Rohde H, Magnus T, Feucht HH, Elsner H-A, Laufs R, Rupp ME: Essential Functional Role of the Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin of Staphylococcus epidermidis in Hemagglutination. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 1004-1008.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Maira-Litran T, Kropec A, Goldmann D, Pier GB: Biologic properties and vaccine potential of the staphylococcal poly-N-acetyl glucosamine surface polysaccharide. Vaccine. 2004, 22: 872-879.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rohde H, Frankenberger S, Zähringer U, Mack D: Structure, function and contribution of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) to Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and pathogenesis of biomaterial-associated infections. Eur J Cell Biol. 2010, 89: 103-111.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sadovskaya I, Vinogradov E, Flahaut S, Kogan G, Jabbouri S: Extracellular Carbohydrate-Containing Polymers of a Model Biofilm-Producing Strain, Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 3007-3017.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mack D, Davies AP, Harris LG, Knobloch JK-M, Rohde H: Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms: Functional Molecules, Relation to Virulence, and Vaccine Potential. Top Curr Chem. 2009, 288: 57-182.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rohde H, Knobloch JK, Horstkotte MA, Mack D: Correlation of biofilm expression types of Staphylococcus epidermidis with polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis: evidence for involvement of icaADBC genotype-independent factors. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2001, 190: 105-112.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kaplan JB, Ragunath C, Velliyagounder K, Fine DH, Ramasubbu N: Enzymatic Detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 2633-2636.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Rohde H, Burandt EC, Siemssen N, Frommelt L, Burdelski C, Wurster S, Scherpe S, Davies AP, Harris LG, Horstkotte MA, Knobloch JK-M, Ragunath C, Kaplan JB, Mack D: Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin or protein factors in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from prosthetic hip and knee joint infections. Biomaterials. 2007, 28: 1711-1720.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chokr A, Watier D, Eleaume H, Pangon B, Ghnassia J-C, Mack D, Jabbouri S: Correlation between biofilm formation and production of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Int J Med Microbiol. 2006, 296: 381-388.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rohde H, Kalitzky M, Kroger N, Scherpe S, Horstkotte MA, Knobloch JK, Zander AR, Mack D: Detection of Virulence-Associated Genes Not Useful for Discriminating between Invasive and Commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis Strains from a Bone Marrow Transplant Unit. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 5614-5619.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ziebuhr W, Heilmann C, Gotz F, Meyer P, Wilms K, Straube E, Hacker J: Detection of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster (ica) and phase variation in Staphylococcus epidermidis blood culture strains and mucosal isolates. Infect Immun. 1997, 65: 890-896.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Otto M: Staphylococcus epidermidis — the 'accidental' pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009, 7: 555-567.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Dobinsky S, Bartscht K, Mack D: Influence of Tn917 Insertion on Transcription of the icaADBC Operon in Six Biofilm-Negative Transposon Mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Plasmid. 2002, 47: 10-17.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    DeLoid GM, Sulahian TH, Imrich A, Kobzik L: Heterogeneity in Macrophage Phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus Strains: High-Throughput Scanning Cytometry-Based Analysis. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e6209-

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Laine RA: The Information-Storing Potential of the Sugar Code. Glycosciences: Status and Perspectives. Edited by: Gabius HJ, Gabius S. 2002, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA, Weinheim, 7-

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Aderem A, Underhill D: Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages. Ann Rev Immunol. 1999, 17: 593-623.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Allen LA, Schlesinger LS, Kang B: Virulent strains of Helicobacter pylori demonstrate delayed phagocytosis and stimulate homotypic phagosome fusion in macrophages. J Exp Med. 2000, 191: 115-128.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ernst JD: Bacterial inhibition of phagocytosis. Cell Microbiol. 2000, 2: 379-386.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Pruimboom IM, Rimler RB, Ackermann MR, Brogden KA: Capsular hyaluronic acid-mediated adhesion of Pasteurella multocida to turkey air sac macrophages. Avian Dis. 1996, 40: 887-893.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pruimboom IM, Rimler RB, Ackermann MR: Enhanced Adhesion of Pasteurella multocida to Cultured Turkey Peripheral Blood Monocytes. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 1292-1296.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Albanyan EA, Vallejo JG, Smith CW, Edwards MS: Nonopsonic Binding of Type III Group B Streptococci to Human Neutrophils Induces Interleukin-8 Release Mediated by the p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway. Infect Immun. 2000, 68: 2053-2060.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Rennermalm A, Nilsson M, Flock J-I: The fibrinogen Binding Protein Of S. epidermidis is a Target for Opsonic Antibodies. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 3081-3083.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Weisman LE, Fischer GW, Thackray HM, Johnson KE, Schuman RF, Mandy GT, Stratton BE, Adams KM, Kramer WG, Mond JJ: Safety and pharmacokinetics of a chimerized anti-lipoteichoic acid monoclonal antibody in healthy adults. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009, 9: 639-644.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Broekhuizen CA, de Boer L, Schipper K, Jones CD, Quadir S, Feldman RG, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Zaat SA: The influence of antibodies on Staphylococcus epidermidis adherence to polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated silicone elastomer in experimental biomaterial-associated infection in mice. Biomaterials. 2009, 30: 6444-6450.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Harro JM, Peters BM, O’May GA, Archer N, Kerns P, Prabhakara R, Shirtliff ME: Vaccine development in Staphylococcus aureus: taking the biofilm phenotype into consideration. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010, 59: 306-323.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    McKenney D, Pouliot KL, Wang Y, Murthy V, Ulrich M, Döring G, Lee JC, Goldmann DA, Pier GB: Broadly protective vaccine for Staphylococcus aureus based on an in vivo expressed antigen. Science. 1999, 284: 1523-1527.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Maira-Litran T, Kropec A, Goldmann DA, Pier GB: Comparative opsonic and protective activities of Staphylococcus aureus conjugate vaccines containing native or deacetylated staphylococcal poly-N-acetyl-beta-(1–6)-glucosamine. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 6752-6762.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Perez MM, Prenafeta A, Valle J, Penadés J, Rota C, Solano C, Marco J, Grilló MJ, Lasa I, Irache JM, Maira-Litran T, Jiménez-Barbero J, Costa L, Pier GB, de Andrés D, Amorena B: Protection from Staphylococcus aureus mastitis associated with poly-N-acetyl beta-1,6 glucosamine specific antibody production using biofilm-embedded bacteria. Vaccine. 2009, 27: 2379-2386.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Gening M, Maira-Litran T, Kropec A, Skurnik D, Grout M, Tsvetkov YE, Nifantiev NE, Pier GB: Synthetic beta-(1,6)-linked N-acetylated and non-acetylated oligoglucosamines to produce conjugate vaccines for bacterial pathogens. Infect Immun. 2010, 78: 764-772.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Spellberg B, Daum R: A new view on development of a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine. Hum Vaccin. 2010, 6: 857-859.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ohlsen K, Lorenz U: Immunotherapeutic strategies to combat staphylococcal infections. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010, 300: 402-410.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Mack D, Rohde H, Dobinsky S, Riedewald J, Nedelmann M, Knobloch JK-M, Elsner H-A, Feucht HH: Identification of three essential regulatory gene loci governing expression of the Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesion and biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2000, 68: 3799-3807.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Rohde H, Burdelski C, Bartscht K, Hussain M, Buck F, Horstkotte MA, Knobloch JK-M, Helimann C, Herrmann M, Mack D: Induction of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation via proteolytic processing of the accumulation-associated protein by staphylococcal and host proteases. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 55: 1883-1895.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Christner M, Franke G, Schommer N, Wendt U, Wegert K, Pehle P, Kroll G, Schulze C, Buck F, Mack D, Aepfelbacher M, Rohde H: The giant extracellular matrix binding protein of Staphylococcus epidermidis mediates biofilm accumulation and attachment to fibronectin. Mol Microbiol. 2010, 75: 187-207.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Arciola CR, Baldassarri L, Montanaro : Presence of icaA and icaD Genes and Slime Production in a Collection of Staphylococcal Strains from Catheter-Associated Infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 2151-2156.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    De Silva GDI, Kantzanou M, Justice A, Massey RC, Wilkinson AR, Day NPJ, Peacock SJ: The ica operon and biofilm production in coagulase-negative staphylococci associated with carriage and disease in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 382-388.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ziebuhr W, Krimmer V, Rachid S, Lobner I, Gotz F, Hacker J: A novel mechanism of phase variation of virulence in Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for control of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis by alternating insertion and excision of the insertion sequence element IS256. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 32: 345-350.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Nilsdotter-Augustinsson A, Koskela A, Öhman L, Söderquist B: Characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from patients with infected hip prostheses: use of phenotypic and genotypic analyses, including tests for the presence of the ica operon. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007, 26: 255-265.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Mack D, Bartscht K, Fischer C, Rohde H, De Grahl C, Dobinsky S, Horstkotte MA, Kiel K, Knobloch JK-M: Genetic and Biochemical Analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Accumulation. Meth Enzymol. 2001, 336: 215-239.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Part of this work was supported by an ESCMID 2009 Training Fellowship given to AS. Part of this work was presented at the 5th Panhellenic Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Hospital Infections, February 2011 and awarded as the best oral presentation by the Organizing Committee. We thank Dr. Jeffrey B. Kaplan, New Jersey Dental School, Newark, USA, for the kind gift of recombinant DspB.

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dietrich Mack or Evangelos D Anastassiou.

Additional information

Authors’ contributions

AS carried out experimental work and drafted the manuscript. FK designed and participated in experiments involving analysis of clinical strains. MK participated in experiments for 20-kDaPS isolation and helped to draft the manuscript. LH participated in experiments involving comparison of PIA and 20-kDaPS by immunofluorescence and contributed to design of these experiments. TW participated in experiments involving comparison of PIA and 20-kDaPS by ELISA and contributed to design of these experiments. AD participated in the design of the study. GD contributed to design of phagocytosis experiments. NK contributed to design of phagocytosis experiments, structural elucidation, data interpretation and revised the manuscript. DM designed the study and experimental work involving comparison of PIA and 20-kDaPS, interpreted acquired data and revised the manuscript. EA conceived of the study, participated in its design and interpretation of acquired data and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spiliopoulou, A.I., Krevvata, M.I., Kolonitsiou, F. et al. An extracellular Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide: relation to Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin and its implication in phagocytosis. BMC Microbiol 12, 76 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Immunofluorescence Test
  • Polysaccharide Molecule
  • Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin
  • Reference Strain ATCC35983
  • Immunofluorescence Slide