- Research article
- Open Access
Diversity and specificity of microsatellites within Aspergillus section Fumigati
© Araujo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 3 May 2012
Accepted: 17 July 2012
Published: 28 July 2012
Microsatellites (or short tandem repeats, STRs) are the genetic markers of choice for studying Aspergillus fumigatus molecular epidemiology due to its reproducibility and high discrimination power. However, the specificity of these markers must be investigated in a group of isolates from closely related species. The aim of this work was to test a microsatellite-based PCR multiplex previously designed for A. fumigatus in a set of species belonging to section Fumigati, namely Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis, Aspergillus lentulus, Aspergillus novofumigatus, Aspergillus unilateralis, Aspergillus viridinutans, Neosartorya fischeri, Neosartorya hiratsukae, Neosartorya pseudofischeri and Neosartorya udagawae.
The reference A. fumigatus strain ATCC 46645 was easily genotyped in standard conditions showing a final electrophoretic profile of 8 expected peaks corresponding to each microsatellite locus. Inversely, no peaks were observed for all other species from section Fumigati, with an exception for marker MC6b in A. unilateralis. By screening the genome sequence of Neosartorya fischeri NRRL 181, the results showed that MC3, MC6a and MC7 might be employed for N. fischeri genotyping since these markers present several repeats of each motif. The accumulation of insertions and deletions was frequently observed in the genomic regions surrounding the microsatellites, including those where the A. fumigatus primers are located. The amplification of microsatellite markers in less stringent amplification conditions resulted in a distinct electrophoretic profile for species within section Fumigati.
Therefore, the microsatellite-based PCR multiplex allow simple identification of A. fumigatus and, with a slight modification of temperature conditions, it also allows discriminating other pathogenic species within section Fumigati, particularly A. fumigatiaffinis, N. fischeri and N. udagawae.
Molecular diagnosis of fungal diseases has become increasingly more used in clinical laboratories and new species morphologically similar to Aspergillus fumigatus were surprisingly revealed [1, 2]. Section Fumigati includes fungal species closely related to A. fumigatus that can go from the anamorphous Aspergillus species to the teleomorphic species of the genus Neosartorya. Misidentification of fungal species within section Fumigati was sporadically reported in some laboratories, particularly of fungal isolates afterwards identified as Aspergillus lentulus, Aspergillus viridinutans, Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis, Aspergillus fumisynnematus, Neosartorya pseudofischeri, Neosartorya hiratsukae and Neosartorya udagawae[1, 2, 4, 5]. These species present similar microscopical and macroscopical features to A. fumigatus and, therefore, molecular identification is at present recommended for the correct identification of species within section Fumigati. A set of genes, namely actin, calmodulin, internal transcribed spacer (ITS), rodlet A and/or β-tubulin, has been proposed for a correct identification of A. fumigatus and related species following sequencing analysis [3, 6]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) , random amplified polymorphic DNA , restriction fragment length polymorphism  and microsphere-based Luminex assay  may allow molecular identification of A. fumigatus. Recently, a practical and cheap electrophoretic strategy was described for molecular identification of A. fumigatus and distinction of the species within the section Fumigati.
In addition to fungal identification, genotyping methodologies have been improving and gained importance in clinical laboratories. Microsatellite typing methods are very useful for studying A. fumigatus molecular epidemiology due to its reproducibility and high discrimination power (around 0.9997). A group of eight microsatellite markers combined in a single PCR multiplex assay with high discrimination power is currently available for A. fumigatus genotyping . Such tool may be very useful to investigate outbreaks in clinical units, to evaluate quality control programmes particularly in units admitting critical-care patients, to identify patients with chronic fungal colonization (e.g. some cystic fibrosis patients) and patients with invasive disease caused by multiple fungal strains [11–14]. In addition, genotyping approaches might allow evaluating the response of patients to the antifungal therapies .
Few microsatellites (or short tandem repeats - STRs) have been described as species-specific [15–18], while others are transversal to a group of closely related species . Nevertheless, these markers are of extreme utility for population and conservation genetics. The complete genome sequence of Neosartorya fischeri, a sibling species, was recently published and high homology was revealed when comparing to A. fumigatus. Repeat elements density was very similar when comparing these two species and two strains of A. fumigatus. The genomic dynamics for acquisition and removal of microsatellites in closely related species is still unknown, and therefore, it is of scientific relevance to compare and highlight the diversity of some microsatellites in a group of very closely related fungi.
Aspergillus fumigatus is one of the most common agents of systemic mold infections. Genotyping strategies (mostly employing microsatellites) have been described as very useful in labs for detection of outbreaks, identification of patients chronically colonized with A. fumigatus and monitoring of antifungal efficacy in patients [2, 5]. In addition, sibling species within section Fumigati should also be promptly identified as they present considerable differences in antifungal resistance . The specificity of microsatellite-based PCR multiplex to A. fumigatus was first confirmed in a group of Aspergillus species , but it is also important to assess both the specificity and the diversity of these microsatellites within Aspergillus section Fumigati. Therefore, the two aims of this study were to evaluate the specificity of a set of previously described microsatellite markers to A. fumigatus in a group of closely-related species and the ability of the multiplex to identify A. fumigatus and other species belonging to section Fumigati based on the presence/absence of some microsatellite markers.
Standard microsatellite-based multiplex PCR tested with Aspergillus spp. and Neosartorya spp
Microsatellites in A. fumigatus AF293 versus N. fischeri NRRL 181
Microsatellite-based PCR multiplex for identification of fungal species
List of markers amplified at 55°C annealing temperature in the group of species belonging to section Fumigati
Aspergillus fumigatus ATCC 46645
Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis CBS 117186
Aspergillus lentulus CBS 116880b
Aspergillus novofumigatus CBS 117519
Aspergillus unilateralis CBS 126.56
Aspergillus viridinutans CBS 121595
Neosartoryafischeri CBS 316.89
Neosartoryahiratsukae CBS 124073
Neosartoryapseudofischeri CBS 208.92b
Neosartoryaudagawae CBS 114217
Species such as A. lentulus, A. viridinutans N. pseudofischeri, and N. udagawae have been described as human pathogens associated to severe cases of trabecular bone invasion, cutaneous, cerebral, liver or pulmonary aspergillosis [1, 2, 21–23]. In addition, some species were reported as primary resistant in vitro to the substance class of azole antifungals [6, 24]. Therefore, due to their intrinsic resistance, infections caused by strains of these species cause difficult to treat infections that deserve increased attention by clinicians. Molecular techniques are recommended for the correct identification of species within the group “A. fumigatus complex”, but most clinical laboratories still cannot afford to routinely implement sequencing technologies. Few electrophoretic methodologies are available for molecular identification of A. fumigatus and related species and represent valid alternatives [7–10]. Since genotyping strategies have been strongly recommended by researchers, clinicians and technicians to be implemented in clinical laboratories, it would be desirable to combine both identification and genotyping capabilities in a single method. In this study, we explored the specificity of an A. fumigatus microsatellite genotyping panel in a group of closely related fungal species. The specificity of microsatellite multiplex was confirmed similar to previously described for other standard molecular methodology, such as MLST . In fact, A. fumigatus could be correctly identified employing this strategy, similarly to what was previously described for Candida parapsilosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, and Saccharomyces boulardii when using microsatellite markers combined in a multiplex. It is worth mentioning that simplified methodologies based on restricted genotyping panels of only one or two microsatellite markers [e.g. , although more practical and rapid for epidemiological studies, can produce inaccurate results. Our data adds to the increasingly reported application of microsatellite alleles to identify some fungi within complexes of species. In this study we also noticed a low transferability of microsatellites within section Fumigati, namely when comparing N. fischeri genome. A small number of markers (4 of 25) have also been described as transferable from related Uredinales species to Hemileia vastatrix. Our results of section Fumigati agree with previous reports that describe a smaller fraction of cross species transfer of microsatellites within fungal genera when compared with higher eukaryotes .
Genomic regions of eukaryotes and prokaryotes with microsatellites are prone to genomic alterations particularly insertions and deletions . In this work we observed such modifications when we compared the genomes of A. fumigatus and N. fischeri in regions with microsatellites. The motif length (tri-, tetra- or pentanucleotide) was not correlated with an increased presence in closely related species. Such genomic dynamics resulted in a distinct electrophoretic profile for each species following the application of microsatellite-based PCR multiplex at 55°C. The relevant pathogens of section Fumigati, such as A. fumigatiaffinis, N. fischeri and N. udagawae, were easily identified, however, testing this strategy in a broader range of species and isolates would better support identification of species within Aspergillus section Fumigati. This strategy has been successfully tested before in the identification of microsatellite transferability in close related species . Furthermore, the genotyping strategies of less studied species of section Fumigati can now be better approached, as new microsatellite markers have now been proposed for A. unilateralis and N. fischeri.
Wide application of typing methodologies can give pertinent information regarding microbial epidemiology, chronic colonization for several patients and effectiveness of antibiotic treatments [11–14]. The initial question on the real specificity of the microsatellite markers selected for A. fumigatus genotyping was answered in the present work and it represents a genuine and required improvement for applicability of the methodology. We proved that the proposed panel with eight microsatellites  is highly appropriate for genotyping A. fumigatus. Besides genotyping, microsatellite-based multiplex PCR allows the identification of A. fumigatus and a slight modification of PCR conditions also allow identifying other pathogenic species within section Fumigati, particularly A. fumigatiaffinis N. fischeri, and N. udagawae. Sequence analysis of marker MC6b showed that A. lentulus and A. viridinutans were different from all the other tested species.
Fungal strains and culture conditions
A set of fungal isolates described as belonging to Aspergillus section Fumigati was obtained from Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS): the pathogenic moulds Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis (CBS 117186), Aspergillus lentulus (CBS 116880, 117180, 117182, and 117885), Aspergillus viridinutans (CBS 121595), Neosartorya fischeri (CBS 316.89), Neosartorya hiratsukae (CBS 124073), Neosartorya pseudofischeri (CBS 208.92 and 110899), and Neosartorya udagawae (CBS 114217), and two non-pathogenic moulds Aspergillus novofumigatus (CBS 117519) and Aspergillus unilateralis (CBS 126.56). The reference strain A. fumigatus ATCC 46645 was also included in the present work, as well as ten different strains of A. fumigatus from our collection. Monospore isolates from all the fungal strains were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar for 5 days at 30°C. A sodium hydroxide based method was used to extract DNA from fungal conidia (protocol at http://www.aspergillus.org.uk/indexhome.htm?secure/laboratory_protocols). Fungal DNA was suspended in 50 μl of sterile water and frozen at -20°C. Control of the DNA quality was carried out by amplifying and sequencing the β-tubulin region in all tested fungi, using previously selected primers .
Microsatellite-based PCR multiplex
Microsatellite PCR multiplex was performed according to previously selected primers that allowed the identification of the microsatellites based on tri-, tetra-, and pentanucleotide motifs located in different chromosomes . The PCRs were performed in 5 μL final volume, with 1 μL of genomic DNA (1–5 ng/μL), 2.5 μL of 2 × Qiagen multiplex PCR master mixes (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and 0.5 μL of a mix of eight primer pairs, at 2 μM concentration. After a 95°C preincubation step of 15 min, PCRs were performed for a total of 30 cycles, using the following conditions: denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 90 s and extension at 72°C for 1 min; with a final extension step of 10 min at 72°C. The internal size standard GeneScan 500 LIZ (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) (0.5 μL) and HiDiformamide (Applied Biosystems) (12 μL) were added to the PCR-amplified products and run in an ABI PRISM 3100 genetic analyser 16-capillary electrophoresis system (Applied Biosystems). Fragment size was performed automatically using Genemapper software 4.0 (Applied Biosystems).
DNA sequencing conditions
PCR-generated fragments were purified with ExoSAP-IT (USB Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) and the reactions were conducted employing an ABI Big Dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) under the following conditions: after a 95°C pre-incubation step of 15 min and DNA denaturation at 96°C for 15 s; 35 PCR cycles were performed with primer annealing at 50°C for 9 s, an extension at 60°C for 2 min; followed by a final extension at 60°C for 10 min. A volume of 8 μL of HiDiformamide were added to the sequencing products and run in an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyser 16-capillary electrophoresis system. The results were analyzed using the Sequencing 5.2 analysis software (Applied Biosystems).
Complete genome sequences of A. fumigatus AF293 and N. fischeri NRRL 181 available at Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org/index.html) were downloaded and the group of eight STRs located in those genomes employing the Geneious software v4.7 (Biomatters Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand) and BioEdit sequence alignment editor (available at http://www.ctu.edu.vn/~dvxe/Bioinformatic/Software/BioEdit.htm).
Acknowledgements and funding
This work was supported by grants from Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (n°. 35-9924-S/2009) and Pfizer Inc. (n°. IIR#WS1948668). RA is supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) Ciência 2007 and by the European Social Fund. IPATIMUP is an Associate Laboratory of the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education and is partially supported by FCT.
- Balajee SA, Gribskov J, Brandt M, Ito J, Fothergill A, Marr KA: Mistaken identity:Neosartoryapseudofischeriand its anamorph masquerading asAspergillus fumigatus. J ClinMicrobiol. 2005, 43: 5996-5999.Google Scholar
- Balajee SA, Gribskov JL, Hanley E, Nickle D, Marr KA: Aspergillus lentulussp. nov., a new sibling species ofA.fumigatus. Eukaryot Cell. 2005, 4: 625-632. 10.1128/EC.4.3.625-632.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Samson RA, Hong S, Peterson SW, Frisvad JC, Varga J: Polyphasic taxonomy ofAspergillussectionFumigatiand its teleomorphNeosartorya. Stud Mycol. 2007, 59: 147-203. 10.3114/sim.2007.59.14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Balajee SA, Nickle D, Varga J, Marr KA: Molecular studies reveal frequent misidentification ofAspergillus fumigatusby morphotyping. Eukaryot Cell. 2006, 5: 1705-1712. 10.1128/EC.00162-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong SB, Shin HD, Hong J, Frisvad JC, Nielsen PV, Varga J, Samson RA: New taxa ofNeosartoryaandAspergillusinAspergillussectionFumigati. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2008, 93: 87-98. 10.1007/s10482-007-9183-1.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yaguchi T, Horie Y, Tanaka R, Matsuzawa T, Ito J, Nishimura K: Molecular phylogenetics of multiple genes onAspergillussectionFumigatiisolated from clinical specimens in Japan. Jap J Med Mycol. 2007, 48: 37-46. 10.3314/jjmm.48.37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brandt ME, Padhye AA, Mayer LW, Holloway BP: Utility of random amplified polymorphic DNA PCR and TaqMan automated detection in molecular identification ofAspergillus fumigatus. J ClinMicrobiol. 1998, 36: 2057-2062.Google Scholar
- Staab JF, Balajee SA, Marr KA: AspergillusSectionFumigatityping by PCR-restriction fragment polymorphism. J ClinMicrobiol. 2009, 47: 2079-2083.Google Scholar
- Etienne KA, Gade L, Lockhart SR, Diekema DJ, Messer SA, Pfaller MA, Balajee SA: Screening of a large globalAspergillus fumigatusspecies complex collection by using a species-specific microsphere-based Luminex assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47: 4171-4172. 10.1128/JCM.01415-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Serrano R, Gusmão L, Amorim A, Araujo R: Rapid identification ofAspergillus fumigatuswithin sectionFumigati. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11: 82-10.1186/1471-2180-11-82.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Araujo R, Pina-Vaz C, Rodrigues AG, Amorim A, Gusmão L: Simple and highly discriminatory microsatellite-based multiplex PCR forAspergillus fumigatusstrain typing. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009, 15: 260-266. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02661.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amorim A, Guedes-Vaz L, Araujo R: Susceptibility to five antifungals ofAspergillus fumigatusstrains isolated from chronically colonised cystic fibrosis patients receiving azole therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010, 35: 396-399. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Balajee SA, de Valk HA, Lasker BA, Meis JF, Klaassen CH: Utility of a microsatellite assay for identifying clonally related outbreak isolates ofAspergillus fumigatus. J Microbiol Methods. 2008, 73: 252-256. 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.02.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vanhee LM, Symoens F, Bouchara JP, Nelis HJ, Coenye T: High-resolution genotyping ofAspergillus fumigatusisolates recovered from chronically colonised patients with cystic fibrosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008, 27: 1005-1007. 10.1007/s10096-008-0527-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hanafy A, Kaocharoen S, Jover-Botella A, Katsu M, Iida S, Kogure T, Gonoi T: Mikami Y. Meyer W: Multilocus microsatellite typing for Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii. Med Mycol. 2008, 46: 685-696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hennequin C, Thierry A, Richard GF, Lecointre G, Nguyen HV, Gaillardin C, Dujon B: Microsatellite typing as a new tool for identification ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaestrains. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 551-559. 10.1128/JCM.39.2.551-559.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matute DR, Sepulveda VE, Quesada LM, Goldman GH, Taylor JW, Restrepo A, McEwen JG: Microsatellite analysis of three phylogenetic species ofParacoccidioidesbrasiliensis. J ClinMicrobiol. 2006, 44: 2153-2157.Google Scholar
- Sabino R, Sampaio P, Rosado L, Stevens DA, Clemons KV, Pais C: New polymorphic microsatellite markers able to distinguish amongCandida parapsilosissensu stricto isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2010, 48: 1677-1682. 10.1128/JCM.02151-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuhls K, Keilonat L, Ochsenreither S, Schaar M, Schweynoch C, Presber W, Schönian G: Multilocus microsatellite typing (MLMT) reveals genetically isolated populations between and within the main endemic regions of visceral leishmaniasis. Microb Infect. 2007, 9: 334-343. 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.12.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fedorova ND, Khaldi N, Joardar VS, Maiti R, Amedeo P, Anderson MJ, Crabtree J, Silva JC, Badger JH, Albarraq A, Angiuoli S, Bussey H, Bowyer P, Cotty PJ, Dyer PS, Egan A, Galens K, Fraser-Liggett CM, Haas BJ, Inman JM, Kent R, Lemieux S, Malavazi I, Orvis J, Roemer T, Ronning CM, Sundaram JP, Sutton G, Turner G, Venter JC, White OR, Whitty BR, Youngman P, Wolfe KH, Goldman GH, Wortman JR, Jiang B, Denning DW, Nierman WC: Genomic islands in the pathogenic filamentous fungusAspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4: e1000046-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000046.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sugui JA, Vinh DC, Nardone G, Shea YR, Chang YC, Zelazny AM, Marr KA, Holland SM, Kwon-Chung KJ: Neosartorya udagawae(Aspergillus udagawae), an emerging agent of aspergillosis: how different is it fromAspergillus fumigatus?. J Clin Microbiol. 2010, 48: 220-228. 10.1128/JCM.01556-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Padhye AA, Godfrey JH, Chandler FW, Peterson SW: Osteomyelitis caused byNeosartoryapseudofischeri. J ClinMicrobiol. 1994, 32: 2832-2836.Google Scholar
- Guarro J, Kallas EG, Godoy P, Karenina A, Gené J, Stchigel A, Colombo AL: Cerebral aspergillosis caused byNeosartorya hiratsukae, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002, 8: 989-991. 10.3201/eid0809.020073.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alcazar-Fuoli L, Mellado E, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL: AspergillussectionFumigati: antifungal susceptibility patterns and sequence-based identification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008, 52: 1244-1251. 10.1128/AAC.00942-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barada G, Basma R, Khalaf RA: Microsatellite DNA identification and genotyping ofCandida albicansfrom Lebanese clinical isolates. Mycopathologia. 2008, 165: 115-125. 10.1007/s11046-008-9089-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cristancho M, Escobar C: Transferability of SSR markers from related Uredinales species to the coffee rustHemileiavastatrix. Genet Mol Res. 2008, 7: 1186-1192. 10.4238/vol7-4gmr493.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baird RE, Wadl PA, Allen T, McNeill D, Wang X, Moulton JK, Rinehart TA, Abbas HK, Shier T, Trigiano RN: Variability of United States isolates ofMacrophominaphaseolinabased on simple sequence repeats and cross genus transferability to related genera within botryosphaeriaceae. Mycopathologia. 2010, 170: 169-180. 10.1007/s11046-010-9308-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McDonald MJ, Wang WC, Huang HD, Leu JY: Clusters of nucleotide substitutions and insertion/deletion mutations are associated with repeat sequences. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9: e1000622-10.1371/journal.pbio.1000622.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dutech C, Enjalbert J, Fournier E, Delmotte F, Barrès B, Carlier J, Tharreau D, Giraud T: Challenges of microsatellite isolation in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007, 44: 933-949. 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.05.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.