- Research article
- Open Access
The Zymomonas mobilis regulator hfq contributes to tolerance against multiple lignocellulosic pretreatment inhibitors
© Yang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 22 October 2009
Accepted: 7 May 2010
Published: 7 May 2010
Zymomonas mobilis produces near theoretical yields of ethanol and recombinant strains are candidate industrial microorganisms. To date, few studies have examined its responses to various stresses at the gene level. Hfq is a conserved bacterial member of the Sm-like family of RNA-binding proteins, coordinating a broad array of responses including multiple stress responses. In a previous study, we observed Z. mobilis ZM4 gene ZMO0347 showed higher expression under anaerobic, stationary phase compared to that of aerobic, stationary conditions.
We generated a Z. mobilis hfq insertion mutant AcRIM0347 in an acetate tolerant strain (AcR) background and investigated its role in model lignocellulosic pretreatment inhibitors including acetate, vanillin, furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). Saccharomyces cerevisiae Lsm protein (Hfq homologue) mutants and Lsm protein overexpression strains were also assayed for their inhibitor phenotypes. Our results indicated that all the pretreatment inhibitors tested in this study had a detrimental effect on both Z. mobilis and S. cerevisiae, and vanillin had the most inhibitory effect followed by furfural and then HMF for both Z. mobilis and S. cerevisiae. AcRIM0347 was more sensitive than the parental strain to the inhibitors and had an increased lag phase duration and/or slower growth depending upon the conditions. The hfq mutation in AcRIM0347 was complemented partially by trans-acting hfq gene expression. We also assayed growth phenotypes for S. cerevisiae Lsm protein mutant and overexpression phenotypes. Lsm1, 6, and 7 mutants showed reduced tolerance to acetate and other pretreatment inhibitors. S. cerevisiae Lsm protein overexpression strains showed increased acetate and HMF resistance as compared to the wild-type, while the overexpression strains showed greater inhibition under vanillin stress conditions.
We have shown the utility of the pKNOCK suicide plasmid for mutant construction in Z. mobilis, and constructed a Gateway compatible expression plasmid for use in Z. mobilis for the first time. We have also used genetics to show Z. mobilis Hfq and S. cerevisiae Lsm proteins play important roles in resisting multiple, important industrially relevant inhibitors. The conserved nature of this global regulator offers the potential to apply insights from these fundamental studies for further industrial strain development.
Biomass-based bioenergy is crucial to meet national goals of making cellulosic ethanol cost-competitive with gasoline. A core challenge in fermenting cellulosic material to ethanol is the recalcitrance of biomass to breakdown. Severe biomass pretreatments are therefore required to release the sugars, which along with by-products of fermentation can create inhibitors including sugar degradation products such as furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF); weak acids such as acetic, formic, and levulinic acids; lignin degradation products such as the substituted phenolics vanillin and lignin monomers . In addition, the metabolic byproducts such as ethanol, lactate, and acetate also influence the fermentation by slowing and potentially stopping the fermentation prematurely. The increased lag phase and slower growth increases the ethanol cost due to both ethanol production rate and total ethanol yield decreases [2, 3]. One approach to overcome the issue of inhibition caused by pretreatment processes is to remove the inhibitor after pretreatment from the biomass physically or chemically, which requires extra equipment and time leading to increased costs. A second approach utilizes inhibitor tolerant microorganisms for efficient fermentation of lignocellulosic material to ethanol and their utility is considered an industrial requirement .
Z. mobilis are Gram-negative facultative anaerobic bacteria with a number of desirable industrial characteristics, such as high-specific productivity and ethanol yield, unique anaerobic use of the Entner-Doudoroff pathway that results in low cell mass formation, high ethanol tolerance (12%), pH 3.5-7.5 range for ethanol production and has a generally regarded as safe (GRAS) status [4–9]. Z. mobilis strains have been engineered to ferment pentose sugars such as xylose, arabinose and other substrates with high yields, but a low tolerance to acetic acid and decreased ethanol tolerance have been reported in recombinant strains [4, 10–12]. Z. mobilis mutant strains tolerant to a pretreatment inhibitor such as acetate have been generated by chemical mutagenesis with N-methyl N'-nitro N-nitrosoguanidine and selection in continuous culture with a progressively increasing concentration of sodium acetate in the medium feed . AcR is capable of efficient ethanol production in the presence of 20 g/L NaAc, while the parent ZM4 is inhibited significantly above 12 g/L NaAc under the same conditions .
We have investigated Z. mobilis ZM4 gene expression and metabolomic profiles during aerobic and anaerobic conditions and found that aerobic, stationary phase conditions produced a number of inhibitory secondary metabolites  and the expression of a putative hfq gene ZMO0347 was greater in anaerobic stationary phase compared to that of aerobic conditions . Hfq is a global regulator that acts as an RNA chaperone and is involved in coordinating regulatory responses to multiple stresses [15–18]. However, little is known about Z. mobilis Hfq.
The aim of this study was to investigate the role of a putative hfq gene ZMO0347 on multiple pretreatment inhibitor tolerances. Z. mobilis genetic modification has been reported previously with the sacC, adhB, and ndh targets for mutagenesis [19–21]. However, the existence of native plasmids [22, 23] and intrinsic antibiotic resistance impedes the use of many broad-host-range plasmids [22, 24, 25]. In this work, we identified appropriate antibiotics for Z. mobilis genetic studies, created an expression plasmid vector, and utilized the pKNOCK-Km suicide plasmid  to create an hfq mutant in Z. mobilis acetate tolerant strain AcR. We demonstrate that the Z. mobilis hfq is important for Z. mobilis tolerance to several classes of lignocellulosic pretreatment inhibitors.
Hfq is part of an ancient family of proteins termed Sm and Sm-like (Lsm) proteins that are conserved among bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes such as yeast S. cerevisiae [16, 27]. Seven core yeast Sm proteins form a heteroheptameric ring with a small central hole and are essential . Eight Lsm proteins (LSM1, LSM2, LSM3, LSM4, LSM5, LSM6, LSM7, and LSM8) in S. cerevisiae form two different heteroheptameric rings containing either Lsm1p or Lsm8p with common Lsm2p-7p components . The complex containing Lsm2-8p localizes to the nucleus and is involved in nuclear RNA processing, and the complex containing Lsm1-7p contributes to cytoplasmic RNA processing [28, 29]. In addition, LSM9 (MAK31) has also been reported to contain a Sm domain, as well as other proteins such as LSM12 (YHR121W), LSM13 (SCD6, YPR129W), and LSM16 (EDC3, YEL015W) . In this study, we also show that S. cerevisiae Lsm1, 6, and 7 proteins contribute to yeast pretreatment inhibitor tolerance.
Bioinformatics analysis of a putative Z. mobilis Hfq and related S. cerevisiae proteins
To assess whether Z. mobilis ZMO0347 was similar to other known members of the Hfq family of regulators, the ZMO0347 protein sequence was used in a BlastP analysis . The BlastP result indicates that ZMO0347 is similar to the E. coli global regulator Hfq protein (60% sequence identity), and to eukaryotic homologues such as Sm or Lsm proteins exist in other microorganisms like S. cerevisiae (Additional file 1). These analyses suggest that ZMO0347 is likely an Hfq regulator family protein in Z. mobilis. Interestingly, the Z. mobilis ZMO0347 (Hfq) protein possesses two Sm-like family domains, two intra-hexamer interaction sites, two inter-hexamer interaction sites, two nucleotide binding pockets, and has an extra Sm-like domain near the C-terminus (Additional file 1A) which is unlike most of the bacterial Hfq protein sequences that have only one Sm-like domain (Additional file 1). S. cerevisiae has nineteen proteins with a Sm or Sm-like domain, and although examples like Sm protein (SmB) and Lsm protein (Lsm1) (Additional file 1C, D, respectively) contain Sm-like domains, significant sequence similarity was not observed by BlastP analysis.
Z. mobilis AcR strain hfq mutant construction and complementation
Intrinsic Z. mobilis antibiotic resistance has been reported previously [22, 25], which restricts the use of the available broad-host-range plasmids. We tested the antibiotic sensitivities of ZM4 and AcR as an initial step for genetic studies with these strains. Each strain was tested against the following antibiotics; chloramphenicol (25, 50, 100, and 200 μg/mL), gentamicin (100, 200, and 300 μg/mL), kanamycin (100, 200, and 300 μg/mL), streptomycin (200 and 300 μg/mL), and tetracycline (25, 50, 100, and 200 μg/mL). Each assay was conducted under aerobic and anaerobic conditions and similar growth results were observed under the respective conditions for the different doses. Z. mobilis was tolerant to streptomycin at concentration of 300 μg/mL and gentamicin at 100 μg/mL. Z. mobilis was able to grow slightly at 100 μg/mL kanamycin and 300 μg/mL gentamicin, and was sensitive to tetracycline and chloramphenicol at concentrations above 25 μg/mL (data not shown).
Bacterial strains, plasmids and primers used in this study
Strain, plasmid, or primer
Genotype, phenotype, or sequence of primer (5' to 3')
K-12 MG1655 Wild-type strain
F- ψ80dlac ZΔM15 Δ(lac ZYA-arg F) U169 rec A1 end A1 hsd R17(rk-, mk+) pho A sup E44 λ- thi-1 gyr A96 rel A1
F- gyr A462 end A1Δ(sr1-rec A) mcr B mrr hsd S20(rB-, mB-) sup E44 ara-14 gal K2 lac Y1 pro A2 rps L20(SmR) xyl-5λ-leu mtl 1
thrB1 004 pro thi rpsL hsdS lacZ ΔM15 RP4-1360 Δ(araBAD)567 ΔdapA 1341::[erm pir]
F- omp T hsd SB(rB-mB-) gal dcm (DE3)
ZM4 acetate tolerant strain generated by random mutagenesis
hfq::pKm-0347, insertional mutant of AcR hfq gene ZMO0347
AcRIM0347 containing plasmid p42-0347
ZM4 containing plasmid p42-0347
AcR containing plasmid p42-0347
MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 met15Δ0 - s288c background
Yeast: Yeast Knock Out Strain (YKO_LSM1)
Clone Id: 1301; Accession: YJL124C (Lsm1)
Yeast: Yeast Knock Out Strain (YKO_LSM6)
Clone Id: 4214; Accession: YDR378C (Lsm6)
Yeast: Yeast Knock Out Strain (YKO_LSM7)
Clone Id: 7383; Accession: YNL147W (Lsm7)
Yeast: Yeast Knock Out Strain (YKO_LSM9)
Clone Id: 3501; Accession: YCR020C-A (Mak31P, Lsm9)
Yeast: Yeast Knock Out Strain (YKO_LSM12)
Clone Id: 1949; Accession: YHR121W (Lsm12)
Yeast: Yeast Knock Out Strain (YKO_LSM13)
Clone Id: 5544; Accession: YPR129W (Lsm13)
Yeast: Yeast Knock Out Strain (YKO_LSM16)
Clone Id: 255; Accession: YEL015W (Lsm16)
Yeast GST-Tagged Strain (GST_LSM1)
Clone Id: YJL124C; Accession: YJL124C (lsm1)
Yeast GST-Tagged Strain (GST_LSM6)
Clone Id: YDR378C; Accession: YDR378C (Lsm6)
Yeast GST-Tagged Strain (GST_LSM9)
Clone Id: YCR020C-A; Accession: YCR020C-A (Mak31P, Lsm9)
Yeast GST-Tagged Strain (GST_LSM12)
Clone Id: YHR121W; Accession: YHR121W (Lsm12)
Yeast GST-Tagged Strain (GST_LSM13)
Clone Id: YPR129W; Accession: YPR129W (Lsm13)
Yeast GST-Tagged Strain (GST_LSM16)
Clone Id: YEL015W; Accession: YEL015W (Lsm16)
Kmr, mob, broad host range suicide cloning vector, 1.8 kb
Apr, Cmr, C-terminal 6×His and V5 epitope
Kmr, gateway entry vector Gmr, N-terminal GST
Tcr, mob, broad host range cloning vector
Cmr Tcr, C-terminal 6×His and V5 epitope
pKnock-Km containing 262-bp hfq internal fragment for insertional mutant construction
pBBR3DEST42 containing ZM4 gene ZMO0347
Z. mobilis hfq contributes to pretreatment inhibitor tolerance
Growth rate and final cell density of different Z. mobilis strains in the absence or presence of different sodium and acetate ions.
Growth rate (hour -1 )
0.42 ± 0.01
0.39 ± 0.01
0.32 ± 0.003
0.33 ± 0.002
0.38 ± 0.003
0.24 ± 0.008
0.29 ± 0.005
0.21 ± 0.008
0.22 ± 0.009
0.25 ± 0.008
RM (NH 4 OAc)
0.20 ± 0.008
0.19 ± 0.005
0.22 ± 0.002
0.19 ± 0.007
0.15 ± 0.004
0.12 ± 0.000
0.09 ± 0.003
0.12 ± 0.006
0.29 ± 0.04
0.12 ± 0.004
0.16 ± 0.002
0.27 ± 0.004
Final Cell Density (OD 600 nm )
0.95 ± 0.006
1.01 ± 0.006
0.94 ± 0.004
0.92 ± 0.002
1.02 ± 0.004
0.73 ± 0.01
0.96 ± 0.01
0.73 ± 0.03
0.72 ± 0.02
0.84 ± 0.01
RM (NH 4 OAc)
0.43 ± 0.01
0.42 ± 0.006
0.32 ± 0.007
0.37 ± 0.008
0.42 ± 0.002
0.40 ± 0.000
0.28 ± 0.007
0.34 ± 0.004
0.63 ± 0.02
0.25 ± 0.001
0.45 ± 0.002
0.59 ± 0.002
Growth rate and final cell density of different Z. mobilis strains in the absence or presence of different pretreatment inhibitors.
Growth rate (hour -1 )
0.48 ± 0.03
0.46 ± 0.003
0.35 ± 0.004
0.32 ± 0.003
0.36 ± 0.02
0.35 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.02
0.22 ± 0.001
0.31 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.005
0.19 ± 0.03
0.20 ± 0.01
0.26 ± 0.001
0.26 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.006
0.20 ± 0.003
Final Cell Density (OD 600 nm )
0.91 ± 0.01
0.98 ± 0.006
0.95 ± 0.003
0.92 ± 0.006
0.93 ± 0.003
0.96 ± 0.006
0.67 ± 0.03
0.78 ± 0.02
0.88 ± 0.006
0.89 ± 0.009
0.67 ± 0.001
0.80 ± 0.02
0.69 ± 0.006
0.71 ± 0.01
0.66 ± 0.01
0.70 ± 0.01
Hfq contributes to sodium and acetate ion tolerances: although the final cell density of hfq mutant AcRIM0347 is similar to that of AcR parental strain (Table 2; Fig. 2A), the growth rate of AcRIM0347 was reduced about one-fifth even without any inhibitor in the RM, which indicates hfq plays a central role in normal Z. mobilis physiology. Wild-type ZM4 that contained p42-0347 was able to grow in the presence of 195 mM sodium acetate and had a similar growth rate and final cell density to that of acetate tolerant strain AcR (Table 2; Fig. 1C). The wild-type ZM4 was unable to grow under this condition.
The inactivation of the hfq gene in AcR decreased this acetate tolerant strain's resistance to both sodium ion (sodium chloride) and acetate ion (ammonium acetate and potassium acetate) (Table 2; Fig. 1). hfq mutant AcRIM0347 was unable to grow in the presence of 195 mM ammonium acetate or potassium acetate (Table 2; Fig. 1D, E). Both the growth rate and final cell density of hfq mutant AcRIM0347 were reduced by at least a quarter in the presence of 195 mM sodium chloride, and about 60% in the presence of 195 mM sodium acetate compared to that of the parental strain AcR (Table 2; Fig. 1B, C). The AcRIM0347 hfq mutation was complemented by the introduction of an hfq-expressing plasmid (p42-0347) into the strain. The complemented mutant strain recovered at least half of the parental strains growth rate and 70% of its final cell density in the presence of 195 mM acetate ion (whether as sodium, ammonium or potassium acetate) (Table 2; Fig. 1).
Hfq contributes to vanillin, furfural and HMF tolerances: AcRIM0347 growth rates were lower than that of ZM4 and AcR under all conditions tests, and except for growth in RM broth (Table 3; Fig. 2). AcRIM0347 also achieved lower final cell densities compared to ZM4 and AcR (Table 3; Fig. 2). When AcRIM0347 was provided functional Z. mobilis Hfq via p42-0347, growth rates under all conditions were largely unchanged (Table 3). However, shorter lag phases were observed for AcRIM0347 (p42-0347) grown with vanillin, furfural or HMF and increases in final cell densities were also observed under these conditions (Table 3; Fig. 2). These data indicate that hfq is important for optimal Z. mobilis growth and its ability to resist furfural, HMF and vanillin toxicity.
Yeast Lsm proteins contribute to pretreatment inhibitor tolerance
Lsm protein and yeast tolerance to sodium and acetate ions
S. cerevisiae Sm and Sm-like (Lsm) proteins are similar to Z. mobilis Hfq at the level of protein sequence (Additional file 1). Growth of yeast Lsm deletion mutants and Lsm over-expressing strains in 305 mM ammonium acetate, potassium acetate, or sodium acetate was assessed to test whether S. cerevisiae Lsm proteins and ZM4 Hfq had functionally similar roles. These studies included seven Lsm deletion mutants affecting three Lsm heteroheptameric ring components (Lsm1, Lsm6, Lsm7) and four other Lsm proteins containing an Sm domain (Lsm9, Lsm12, Lsm13, Lsm16), as well as six Lsm protein over-expressing strains (Lsm1, Lsm6, Lsm9, Lsm12, Lsm13, Lsm16). We present growth data for those genes that gave clear phenotypic differences for the sake of clarity and a list of all strains tested in this study can be found in Table 1.
Growth differences between the Lsm mutants and yeast wild-type BY4741 in the CM broth without the addition of acetate or with 305 mM NaCl were not observed (Additional file 3A, B, respectively). S. cerevisiae Lsm proteins involved in RNA processing ring complex formation (Lsm1, 6, 7), especially Lsm6, played a role in acetate tolerance (Additional file 3C-E, K-M). Lsm protein deletion mutants Lsm1, 6, and 7 showed decreased acetate tolerance compared to the wild-type control strain, especially in early growth stages for acetate with sodium, ammonium and potassium counter-ions (Additional file 3C-E). The Lsm overexpression strains grew similarly to wild-type BY4741 without the addition of acetate or with 305 mM NaCl (Additional file 3I, J), but each of the Lsm protein overexpression strains showed enhanced acetate tolerance compared to the wild-type strain with sodium, ammonium or potassium counter-ions (Additional file 3K-M).
Lsm proteins and yeast tolerance to vanillin, furfural and HMF
the effect of Lsm proteins on S. cerevisiae tolerance to pretreatment inhibitors vanillin, furfural, and HMF was also investigated using the seven Lsm deletion mutants and six Lsm overexpression strains described above. Each yeast deletion mutant and each overexpression strain showed similar growth profiles compared to wild-type strain BY4741 in the absence of inhibitors (Additional file 3A; I). Deletion mutants for Lsm1, 6 and 7 proteins were unable to grow or showed extended lag phases before recovery from the inhibitory effects of pretreatment inhibitors (Additional file 3F-H). Overexpression of Lsm proteins provided a slight growth advantage in the presence of 1.5 g/L HMF and furfural (Additional file 3O-P). However, a detrimental effect on growth was observed for overexpression strains when cultured in the presence of 0.75 g/L vanillin (Additional file 3N). The data indicated that Lsm proteins Lsm1, 6, and 7 especially Lsm6, which are the components of yeast RNA processing ring complex, play a role in tolerance to the model inhibitors used in this study.
A previous study indicated that Z. mobilis ZM4 hfq was less abundant in aerobic, stationary phase fermentations compared to the equivalent anaerobic condition and that rpoH was induced under the aerobic condition . The role of Z. mobilis regulators like Hfq and extent of cross talk between regulatory networks remains to be elucidated. This study indicated that hfq also plays a role in Z. mobilis resistance to both acetate (sodium acetate, potassium acetate, or ammonium acetate) and sodium ions (sodium chloride and sodium acetate) (Table 2; Fig. 1). A recent study has identified that nhaA overexpression (encoding a sodium-proton antiporter) conferred the previously reported AcR (sodium acetate tolerant) mutant phenotype . Constitutive nhaA over-expression in strain AcRIM0347 (hfq-) is a likely possibility for it being unable to survive with 195 mM ammonium acetate or potassium acetate, while the same concentration of sodium acetate only partially repressed its growth. hfq or nhaA each contribute to sodium acetate tolerance (Table 2; Fig. 1C) , but there is no additive benefit for increased inhibitor tolerance for hfq and nhaA if both were over-expressed at the same time (data not shown). In addition, the overexpression of nhaA gene in Z. mobilis had no advantage over other physiological stress responses for model pretreatment inhibitors such as vanillin, furfural, and HMF . While Z. mobilis hfq contributes to the tolerance of these inhibitors as shown by increased hfq mutant AcRIM0347 lag phases and slower growth rates during early logarithmic growth phase compared to AcR strain (Fig. 2). These separate studies indicate there may often be more than one pathway for industrial strain development.
The majority of proteins similar to Z. mobilis Hfq contained one Sm-like superfamily domain (Additional file 3), with the exception of those from six other species also within the Sphingomonadales. Future structural studies are required to define the role for Z. mobilis and other microorganisms with two Sm-like family domains, to elucidate Hfq subunit interactions, and to test whether only three Hfq proteins would be needed for Z. mobilis to form the active homo-hexameric ring structure.
We assayed growth phenotypes for S. cerevisiae Lsm protein mutant and overexpression phenotypes. Lsm1, 6, and 7 mutants showed reduced tolerance to acetate and other pretreatment inhibitors (Additional file 3). The S. cerevisiae Lsm over-expression studies showed these strains had increased acetate and HMF resistance compared to the wild-type strain, while the overexpression strains were more inhibited under vanillin stress conditions (Additional file 3). The conserved nature of Sm-like proteins, the involvement of ZM4 Hfq and S. cerevisiae Sm-like proteins in pretreatment inhibitor tolerance offers the possibility of manipulating hfq and members of the Lsm family for strain development purposes.
We created a plasmid for gene expression and mutation complementation in Z. mobilis and used the pKnock system to create an hfq mutant in Z. mobilis acetate tolerant strain AcR. We showed that Z. mobilis hfq played a role in tolerance to multiple biomass pretreatment inhibitors including acetate, vanillin, furfural, and HMF. In addition, Hfq homologues of yeast Lsm proteins Lsm1, 6, and 7 involving in the RNA processing heteroheptameric ring complex formation, especially Lsm6, contribute to multiple pretreatment inhibitor tolerance in S. cerevisiae. However, further studies such as systems biology studies and ChIP-Seq are required to elucidate the hfq stress response regulon in Z. mobilis and the yeast inhibitor tolerance genes affected by the RNA processing Lsm complexes.
Strains and culture conditions
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. coli strains were cultured using Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or agar plates. E. coli WM3064 was supplemented with 100 μg/mL diaminopimelic acid (DAP). Z. mobilis ZM4 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC 31821) and the Z. mobilis acetate tolerant strain AcR has been described previously . ZM4 and AcR were cultured in RM medium (Glucose, 20.0 g/L; Yeast Extract, 10.0 g/L; KH2PO4, 2.0 g/L, pH5.0) at 30°C.
S. cerevisiae wild-type, deletion mutant and GST-fusion ORF overexpression strains were obtained through Open Biosystems (Huntsville, AL). S. cerevisiae strains were cultured in CM medium with 2% glucose for wild-type and S. cerevisiae deletion mutants. CM medium with 2% glucose minus uracil was used for S. cerevisiae GST-over expressing strains, and 2% galactose was used to induce the GST-fusion strains. CM broth with glucose and CM broth with glucose minus uracil were purchased from Teknova Inc. (Hollister, CA) (C8000 and C8140 respectively).
Plasmid-containing strains were routinely grown with antibiotics at the following concentrations (μg/mL): kanamycin, 50 for E. coli and 200 for ZM4; tetracycline, 10 for E. coli and 20 for ZM4; gentamicin, 10 for E. coli; and G418, 200 for S. cerevisiae YKO deletion mutants. Bacterial growth was monitored using the Bioscreen C automated microbiology growth curve analysis system using 600nm filter (Growth Curves USA, Piscataway, NJ).
PCR and DNA manipulations
Genomic DNA from Z. mobilis was isolated using a Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI). The QIAprep Spin Miniprep and HiSpeed Plasmid Midi kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) were used for plasmid isolation. PCR, restriction enzyme digestion, ligation, cloning, and DNA manipulations were following standard molecular biology approaches as described previously  and sequencing was conducted using BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing chemistry (Applied Biosystems Inc, Foster City, CA) on a 48-capillary 3730 DNA Analyzer sequencer (Applied Biosystems Inc).
AcR strain hfq insertional mutant construction
An hfq insertion mutant was created using the pKnock-Km suicide plasmid system [26, 31] in a Z. mobilis acetate tolerant strain (AcR) background and the resulting strain designated as AcRIM0347. Briefly, a 262-bp internal DNA fragment of the Z. mobilis hfq gene (ZMO0347) was amplified by PCR using primers hfq_MF and hfq_MR (Table 1), and ligated into pKnock-Km using Fast-Link™ DNA Ligation Kit (Epicentre). The plasmid was designated as pKm-0347, which was then electroporated into E. coli WM3064. The pKm-0347 plasmid from E. coli WM3064 was verified by PCR and Sanger sequencing analysis. AcR and E. coli WM3064 (pKm-0347) cells were mixed and plated onto RM agar plates with 100 μg/mL DAP and 50 μg/mL kanamycin for conjugation. The cells were incubated at 30°C overnight and then subcultured on RM agar plates with 50 μg/mL kanamycin in the absence of DAP. Putative conjugants were then screened by PCR using primers hfq_OCF and hfq_OCR (Table 1). Wild-type AcR has a 1,050-bp PCR product and hfq mutant candidates had a 2.9-kb PCR product. Presumptive positive PCR products from mutant clones were confirmed by Sanger sequencing analysis.
Construction of a Gateway vector for ZMO0347 overexpression and mutant complementation
Construction of hfq Gateway® entry vector and new destination vector termed pBBR3DEST42 was carried out as previously described , except that we used pBBRMCS-3 containing the tetracycline resistance cassette in this study. pBBR3DEST42 was used for hfq expression and the resulting vector designated p42-0347. Briefly, DNA for the target gene was amplified via PCR using AcR genomic template DNA and the hfq_CF and hfq_CR primers (Table 1). PCR products were then cloned into Gateway® entry clone pDONR221 using BP Clonase II enzyme mix following the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen), transformed into chemically competent DH5α cells (Invitrogen), and plated onto LB with appropriate antibiotic selection. The identity of insert DNA was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis using the M13 forward and reverse primers (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Coralville, IA). The confirmed entry clone vector was then recombined with destination vector pBBR3DEST42 using LR Clonase II enzyme mix (Invitrogen) to create the expression vector, essentially as described previously . The resulting expression plasmid was designed as p42-0347. The plasmid construct p42-0347 was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis.
ZMO0347 overexpression strain ZM4 (p42-0347) and hfq complemented mutant strain AcRIM0347 (p42-02347) were generated by conjugation. Briefly, Z. mobilis (ZM4 or AcRIM0347) cells were mixed with E. coli WM3064 (p42-0347) cells, plated onto RM agar plates with 100 μg/mL DAP and 10 μg/mL tetracycline for conjugation. The cells were incubated at 30°C overnight and then subcultured on RM agar plates with 10 μg/mL tetracycline in the absence of DAP. The tetracycline resistant conjugants were confirmed to be correct using PCR and Sanger sequence analysis.
We thank Patricia K. Lankford for Western-blot technical support and the helpful comments from anonymous reviewers for the revision of this manuscript. This work is sponsored by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the U. S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725. The BioEnergy Science Center is a U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Research Center supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science.
- Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Liden G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF: Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Tech Biotech. 2007, 82 (4): 340-349. 10.1002/jctb.1676.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kadar Z, Maltha SF, Szengyel Z, Reczey K, De Laat W: Ethanol fermentation of various pretreated and hydrolyzed substrates at low initial pH. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2007, 137: 847-858. 10.1007/s12010-007-9102-y.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi CM, Takahashi DF, Carvalhal MLC, Alterthum F: Effects of acetate on the growth and fermentation performance of Escherichia coli KO11. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1999, 81 (3): 193-203. 10.1385/ABAB:81:3:193.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dien BS, Cotta MA, Jeffries TW: Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003, 63 (3): 258-266. 10.1007/s00253-003-1444-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Panesar PS, Marwaha SS, Kennedy JF: Zymomonas mobilis: an alternative ethanol producer. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2006, 81 (4): 623-635. 10.1002/jctb.1448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rogers PL, Goodman AE, Heyes RH: Zymomonas ethanol fermentations. Microbiol Sci. 1984, 1 (6): 133-136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rogers PL, Jeon YJ, Lee KJ, Lawford HG: Zymomonas mobilis for fuel ethanol and higher value products. Biofuels. 2007, 108: 263-288. full_text.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Swings J, De Ley J: The biology of Zymomonas mobilis. Bacteriol Rev. 1977, 41: 1-46.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gunasekaran P, Raj KC: Ethanol fermentation technology: Zymomonas mobilis. Curr Sci. 1999, 77 (1): 56-68.Google Scholar
- Ranatunga TD, Jervis J, Helm RF, McMillan JD, Hatzis C: Identification of inhibitory components toxic toward Zymomonas mobilis CP4(pZB5) xylose fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1997, 67 (3): 185-198. 10.1007/BF02788797.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lawford HG, Rousseau JD: Improving fermentation performance of recombinant Zymomonas in acetic acid-containing media. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1998, 70-2: 161-172. 10.1007/BF02920133.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lawford HG, Rousseau JD, Tolan JS: Comparative ethanol productivities of different Zymomonas recombinants fermenting oat hull hydrolysate. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2001, 91-3: 133-146. 10.1385/ABAB:91-93:1-9:133.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Joachimstahl E, Haggett KD, Jang JH, Rogers PL: A mutant of Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 capable of ethanol production from glucose in the presence of high acetate concentrations. Biotechnol Lett. 1998, 20 (2): 137-142. 10.1023/A:1005320306410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang S, Tschaplinski TJ, Engle NL, Carroll SL, Martin SL, Davison BH, Palumbo AV, Rodriguez M, Brown SD: Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of Zymomonas mobilis during aerobic and anaerobic fermentations. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10 (1): 34-10.1186/1471-2164-10-34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsui HC, Leung HC, Winkler ME: Characterization of broadly pleiotropic phenotypes caused by an hfq insertion mutation in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 13 (1): 35-49. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00400.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sittka A, Lucchini S, Papenfort K, Sharma CM, Rolle K, Binnewies TT, Hinton JC, Vogel J: Deep sequencing analysis of small noncoding RNA and mRNA targets of the global post-transcriptional regulator, Hfq. PLoS genetics. 2008, 4 (8): e1000163-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000163.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang A, Wassarman KM, Rosenow C, Tjaden BC, Storz G, Gottesman S: Global analysis of small RNA and mRNA targets of Hfq. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 50 (4): 1111-1124. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03734.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valentin-Hansen P, Eriksen M, Udesen C: The bacterial Sm-like protein Hfq: a key player in RNA transactions. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 51 (6): 1525-1533. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2003.03935.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalnenieks U, Galinina N, Toma MM, Pickford JL, Rutkis R, Poole RK: Respiratory behaviour of a Zymomonas mobilis adhB::kan(r) mutant supports the hypothesis of two alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes catalysing opposite reactions. FEBS letters. 2006, 580 (21): 5084-5088. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.08.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalnenieks U, Galinina N, Strazdina I, Kravale Z, Pickford JL, Rutkis R, Poole RK: NADH dehydrogenase deficiency results in low respiration rate and improved aerobic growth of Zymomonas mobilis. Microbiology (Reading, England). 2008, 154 (Pt 3): 989-994.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kannan R, Mukundan G, Ait-Abdelkader N, Augier-Magro V, Baratti J, Gunasekaran P: Molecular cloning and characterization of the extracellular sucrase gene (sacC) of Zymomonas mobilis. Arch Microbiol. 1995, 163 (3): 195-204. 10.1007/BF00305353.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strzelecki AT, Goodman AE, Rogers PL: Behavior of the IncW plasmid Sa in Zymomonas mobilis. Plasmid. 1987, 18 (1): 46-53. 10.1016/0147-619X(87)90077-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang S, Pappas KM, Hauser LJ, Land ML, Chen GL, Hurst GB, Pan C, Kouvelis VN, Typas MA, Pelletier DA: Improved genome annotation for Zymomonas mobilis. Nat Biotechnol. 2009, 27 (10): 893-894. 10.1038/nbt1009-893.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor MP, Esteban CD, Leak DJ: Development of a versatile shuttle vector for gene expression in Geobacillus spp. Plasmid. 2008, 60 (1): 45-52. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2008.04.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walia SK, Carey VC, All BP, Ingram LO: Self-transmissible plasmid in Zymomonas mobilis carrying antibiotic resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984, 47 (1): 198-200.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alexeyev MF: The pKNOCK series of broad-host-range mobilizable suicide vectors for gene knockout and targeted DNA insertion into the chromosome of gram-negative bacteria. BioTechniques. 1999, 26 (5): 824-826. 828PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen JS, Boggild A, Andersen CBF, Nielsen G, Boysen A, Brodersen DE, Valentin-Hansen P: An Hfq-like protein in archaea: Crystal structure and functional characterization of the Sm protein from Methanococcus jannaschii. RNA. 2007, 13 (12): 2213-2223. 10.1261/rna.689007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cherry JM, Adler C, Ball C, Chervitz SA, Dwight SS, Hester ET, Jia Y, Juvik G, Roe T, Schroeder M: SGD: Saccharomyces Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26 (1): 73-79. 10.1093/nar/26.1.73.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weng S, Dong Q, Balakrishnan R, Christie K, Costanzo M, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Engel S, Fisk DG, Hong E: Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides biochemical and structural information for budding yeast proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (1): 216-218. 10.1093/nar/gkg054.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215 (3): 403-410.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown SD, Martin M, Deshpande S, Seal S, Huang K, Alm E, Yang Y, Wu L, Yan T, Liu X: Cellular response of Shewanella oneidensis to strontium stress. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72 (1): 890-900. 10.1128/AEM.72.1.890-900.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang S, Land ML, Klingeman DM, Pelletier DA, Lu TS, Martin SL, Guo HB, Smith JC, Brown SD: A paradigm for industrial strain improvement identifies sodium acetate tolerance mechanisms in Zymomonas mobilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.Google Scholar
- Joachimsthal EL, Rogers PL: Characterization of a high-productivity recombinant strain of Zymomonas mobilis for ethanol production from glucose/xylose mixtures. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2000, 84-86: 343-356. 10.1385/ABAB:84-86:1-9:343.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook JaRD: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Third Edition). 2000, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
- Pelletier DA, Hurst GB, Foote LJ, Lankford PK, McKeown CK, Lu TY, Schmoyer DD, Shah MB, Hervey WJ, McDonald WH: A general system for studying protein-protein interactions in gram-negative bacteria. J Proteome Res. 2008, 7 (8): 3319-3328. 10.1021/pr8001832.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kovach ME, Elzer PH, Hill DS, Robertson GT, Farris MA, Roop RM, Peterson KM: Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes. Gene. 1995, 166 (1): 175-176. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00584-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.