Skip to main content
Download PDF

Vibrio cholerae O1 and Escherichia coli O157:H7 from drinking water and wastewater in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

BMC Microbiology volume 24, Article number: 219 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, open ditches along innner roads in residential areas serve to convey domestic wastewater and rainwater away from residences. Contamination of drinking water by wastewater through faulty distribution lines could expose households to waterborne illnesses. This prompted the study to assess the microbiological safety of wastewater and drinking water in Addis Ababa, identify the pathogens therein, and determine their antibiotic resistance patterns.

Results Vibrio cholerae

O1, mainly Hikojima serotype, was isolated from 23 wastewater and 16 drinking water samples. Similarly, 19 wastewater and 10 drinking water samples yielded Escherichia coli O157:H7. V. cholerae O1 were 100% resistant to the penicillins (Amoxacillin and Ampicillin), and 51–82% were resistant to the cephalosporins. About 44% of the V. cholerae O1 isolates in this study were Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producers. Moreover, 26% were resistant to Meropenem. Peperacillin/Tazobactam was the only effective β-lactam antibiotic against V. cholerae O1. V. cholerae O1 isolates showed 37 different patterns of multiple resistance ranging from a minimum of three to a maximum of ten antimicrobials. Of the E. coli O157:H7 isolates, 71% were ESBL producers. About 96% were resistant to Ampicillin. Amikacin and Gentamicin were very effective against E. coli O157:H7 isolates. The isolates from wastewater and drinking water showed multiple antibiotic resistance against three to eight antibiotic drugs.

Conclusions

Open ditches for wastewater conveyance along innner roads in residence areas and underground faulty municipal water distribution lines could be possible sources for V. cholerae O1 and E. coli O157:H7 infections to surrounding households and for dissemination of multiple drug resistance in humans and, potentially, the environment.

Peer Review reports

Background

Water is the dominant component of living organisms and consumption of water is a basic requirement for survival. Access to safe drinking water is essential for human health and well being. Therefore, drinking water must be free from disease-causing organisms and poisonous chemicals. One of the Sustainable Development Goals, ‘Goal Six’, aims at ensuring availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all by 2030” [1]. To achieve the goal, water supply systems should be constructed or improved so that safe piped water at point-of-use is provided to consumers. Thus, a safe sanitation system should be designed and used to separate human excreta from human contact at all steps of the sanitation service chain [2].

In Addis Ababa and other cities in Ethiopia, households secure drinking water from treated municipality lines. Drinking water, however, is not sterile and low levels of microorganisms may persist in the treated water [3]. However, there were reports that drinking water at point-of-use was more contaminated than at the source in many developing countries, including Ethiopia [4,5,6,7]. Even worse, the prevalence of diarrheagenic bacteria was more frequent in water at point-of-use than in the public domain source water in a low-income community [8]. These findings are thus indicative of faulty drinking water distribution lines.

In Addis Ababa, it is common to see open ditches, serving as sewers, along innner roads in residential areas, to convey wastewater and rainwater away from residences. Open-ditch sewers are often blocked throughout the distribution line, and result in stagnant wastewater close to residences. This would eventually sink into the soil surrounding old, and possibly corroded and perforated, underground water distribution lines. It is reported that microorganisms in the surrounding could be sucked into drinking water distribution system by negative pressure [9], causing contaminant to pass into water distribution system as proved experimentally by Fontanazza et al. [10]. According to a study in Arbaminch, Ethiopa, faulty distribution lines could lead to the infiltration of bacterial contaminants into drinking water [5].

Several authors have isolated various pathogens from drinking water. A review by Kristanti et al. [11]. showed that pathogenic bacteria, viruses, protozoan parasites, and parasitic worms were isolated from drinking water from different parts of the world.

Isolation of Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae) from environmental samples such as drinking water or sewer systems were reported from Nepal [12], Bangladesh [13], Uganda [14, 15] and Azerbaijan [16]. Vibrio cholerae causes cholera, manifested as life-threatening voluminous and watery diarrhea and vomiting. Outbreaks of cholera in different sub-cities of Addis Ababa have been reported at different times [17,18,19,20]. Although the pathogen was isolated from stool specimen, none of the studies, however, isolated V. cholerae from environmental samples, except one which reported the isolation of the pathogen from two holy water samples consumed [20].

Similarly, it has been long reported that Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7 has been isolated from drinking water samples in different countries [21,22,23]. E. coli O157:H7 typically causes acute bloody diarrhea, which may lead to hemolytic-uremic syndrome. In Ethiopia, several reports indicate the isolation of E. coli O157:H7 only from meat and milk from cattle [24,25,26,27].

Various studies reported the antimicrobial sensitivity patterns of V. cholerae [28,29,30] or E. coli O157:H7 [31, 32]. Multiple drug resistance was detected in a considerable proportion of isolates belonging to both species [33].

The aims of this study were, therefore, (a) to isolate V. cholerae and E. coli O157:H7 from drinking water at point-of-use and wastewater in open ditches found along innner roads in residential areas in Addis Ketema and Akaki/Kality sub-cities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and (b) to determine the antimicrobial resistance levels of the isolates (c) to detect Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing and Carbapenem resistant V. cholerae and E. coli O157:H7 .

Materials and methods

Study area and study period

A Cross sectional study was conducted in three woredas each of Addis Ketema and Akaki/Kality sub-cities to isolate V. cholerae and E. coli O157:H7 from drinking water and wastewater samples. Sample size was determined using simple population proportion formula.

$$\begin{gathered}n = \frac{{{{(Z\alpha /2)}^2}pq}}{{{d^2}}} \hfill \\\,\,\,\, = \frac{{{{(1.96)}^2} \times (0.14 \times 0.86)}}{{{{0.05}^2}}} = 185 \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$

Where: n = sample size; Zα = risk expresses in z-score; p = expected prevalence (14%, based on 2019 Cholera outbreak); q = 1-p; d = absolute precision.

Considering a 10% non-responsive rate, the final sample size was taken as 206.

A total of 206 environmental water samples were aseptically collected from drinking water at point-of-use and surface sewerage from May to July 2023. These samples were collected from six different woredas within two sub cities in Addis Ababa (Fig. 1). A woreda is the smallest administrative unit in Addis Ababa. The sub cities were Addis Ketema sub city and Akaki Kality sub city. Three woredas each were selected from the two sub-cities: Woreda Three, Seven and Eight from Addis Ketema and Woreda Six, Seven and Eight were from Akaki Kality sub cities.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map showing the study woredas in Addis Ketema and Akaki/Kality sub-cities, Addis Ababa

Full size image

The study sub-cities and woredas were selected purposively based on their high incidence of cholera cases in the 2019 outbreak in Addis Ababa. The simple population proportion formula was used to determine the sample size and a total of 206 samples consisting of drinking water (n = 97) and wastewater (n = 108) were considered for this study. Study households were selected following the systematic random sampling method. Sewage samples were collected from open sewage ditches close to selected households.

All drinking water samples were collected from point-of-use taps found in a total of 97 households from all study woredas each of the two study sub-cities. A volume of 250 mL of drinking water samples was aseptically collected using 500-ml sterile narrow-necked screw capped bottle. Similarly, 250 mLof wastewater samples were aseptically collected from 108 open ditch sewer sites found along innner roads in residential areas in both sub-cities. Collected samples were immediately transported to the laboratory in an icebox. Samples were processed within two hours of collection.

Isolation of V. cholerae and E. coli O157:H7

A volume of 100 of a well-mixed sample was filtered through a 0.22-µm pore size polycarbonate filter (diameter 45 mm). The filter was placed in a 50 mL falcon tube containing 12 mL of sterile Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) (OXOID) and vortexed vigorously for 5 min to suspend the attached bacteria into the saline solution.

To isolate V. cholerae, an aliquot of one mL of PBS suspension was added to an enrichment flask containing 25-ml Alkaline Peptone Water (APW) and incubated at 30-35oC for 18–24 h [34].

Surface growth from APW was streaked on pre-dried plates of Thiosulfate Citrate Bile salts Sucrose (TCBS) agar (OXOID) and incubated at 30-35oC for 18–24 h. All yellow colonies that fermented sucrose in TCBS agar were sub-cultured on Trypton Soy (TSY) Agar (OXOID). For cell morphology, wet mounts were examined microscopically at 40x using oil immersion. Colonies from TSY agar were also subjected to oxidase and string tests for Vibrio cholearae. Curved rods that had positive oxidase and string tests were presumptively considered as V. cholerae [34]. For serological confirmation, colonies were suspended in 0.5 mL physiological saline on a glass slide and gently mixed with a drop of antiserum for somatic O antigens by tilting the glass slide back and forth for one minute. Agglutination indicated a positive serological reaction. Serogroup O1 was similarly serotyped using type antisera.

To isolate E. coli O157:H7, 25 mL of the membrane filtered suspension was added to Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and was incubated at 32 ºC for 18–24 h. The growth was directly streaked on pre-dried plates of Sorbitol MacConkey (SMAC) agar [35] and incubated at 32 ºC for 18–24 h. Non-sorbitol fermenting colorless colonies were further subjected for confirmation using E. coli O157:H7 Latex agglutination Test [36].

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for V. cholerae O1 and E. coli O157:H7 isolates

Antimicrobial susceptibility for V. cholerae and E. coli O157:H7 was determined by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar plates with commercially available antibiotic discs (OXOID) The 0.5 MacFarland was maintained using a 0.85% saline suspension of fresh colony from TSA agar and by measuring it using an OXOID MacFarland spectrometer.

V. cholerae Isolates were tested against 13 antimicrobial drugs consisting of amoxycillin (AML, 30 µg), azithromycin (AZM, 15 µg), ampicillin (AMP, 10 µg), peperacilin pazobactam (TZP, 110 µg), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (STX, 25 µg), meropenem (MEM, 10 µg), cefoxitin (FOX, 10 µg), tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), nalidixic acid (NA, 30 µg), ceftriaxone (CRO, 30 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 µg), ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (CAZ/CLA, 30/10 µg). After an overnight incubation of Mueller-Hinton agar, the inhibition zone of each antibiotic was measured [37].

E. coli O157:H7 isolates were also tested against 12 antimicrobial drugs consisting of ampicillin sulbactam (SAM 20 µg), amoxcillin clavulanic acid (AMC 30 µg), azithromycin (AZM, 15 µg), ampicillin (AMP, 10 µg), amikacin (AK, 30 µg), gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), trimethoprim/ sulphamethoxazole (SXT, 25 µg), imipenem (IPM, 10 µg), tetracycline (TET, 30 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), ceftriaxone (CRO, 30 µg), nitrofurantoin (F 300, µg). After an overnight incubation of Mueller-Hinton agar, the inhibition zone of each antibiotic was measured [38]. E. coli ATCC 25,922 strain was used as a positive control.

In both susceptibility tests a known positive control, and a blank disc were included. After an overnight incubation of Mueller-Hinton agar, the inhibition zone of each antibiotic was measured and recorded. For interpretation, the ‘Intermediate’ values were considered as ‘Sensitive’.

The multiple antibiotic resistance index (MARI) was calculated and interpreted according to Krumperman [39] using the formula: a/b, where ‘a’ represented the number of antibiotics to which an isolate was resistant, and ‘b’ represented the total number of antibiotics tested.

Determination of extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production and carbapenem resistance

Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) producing V. cholerae and E. coli O157:H7 isolates was determined by using a double disk synergy test (DDST) [40]. Ceftazidime and Ceftazidime Clavulanic acid discs were employed and an inhibition zone diameter difference of ≥ 5 mm between the two drugs was considered as indication of ESBL production.

To detect Carbapenem Resistance among V. cholerae and E. coli O157: H7 resistance against Meropenem and Imipenem were checked, respectively. After an overnight incubation of Mueller-Hinton agar, the inhibition zone of both antibiotics was measured and recorded. The recorded size of inhibition zone was then changed into Sensitive (S), Intermediate (I) and Resistant (R) as per CLSI-M100. Resistance against the drugs were considered ar Carbapenem Resistance.

Results and discussion

A total of 206 samples were collected from Addis Ketema (132) and Akaki/Kality (74) sub-cities. Of these, 97 (47.1%) were drinking water samples collected from point-of-use taps and 109 (52.9%) were wastewater samples from open sewers. V. cholerae O1 was isolated from 18 samples from Addis Ketema and 21 samples from Akaki/Kality sub-cities. Of the positive samples, 16 were drinking water samples and 23 were those from wastewater (Table 1). V.cholerae O1 isolates were dominated by Hikojima type (Table 1). Similar to the findings of this study, Ferdous et al. [7] detected V. cholerae in 10% of point-of-drinking water samples in a low-income urban community in Bangladesh. Similarly, the most frequently isolated V. cholerae O1 serotype from the sewage of Katmandu Valley, Nepal, was the Hikojima strain [12]. In a recent cholera outbreak in Addis Ababa, the responsible serotype belonged to the Ogawa type [18]. A review on cholera in Sub-Saharan Africa showed that Ogawa and Inaba serotypes were predominant [41]. V. cholerae O1 serotypes isolated from Kisumu county, Kenya were dominantly Inaba types followed by Ogawa [42]. According to Jubyda et al. [43], serotypes of V. cholerae O1 strains differed temporally in predominance in Bangladesh.

Table 1 Vibrio cholerae and E. coli O157:H7 isolated from wastewater and drinking water samples in the study sub-cities
Full size table

A total of 28 strains of E. coli O157:H7 were isolated from the total samples of wastewater and drinking water in this study. The pathogen was encountered only in one samples of drinking water and seven samples of wastewater found in two woredas of Addis Ketema sub-city. Nine drinking water and 12 wastewater samples in Akaki/Kality sub-city, however, yielded E. coli O157:H7 (Table 1). Other authors also reported the isolation of E. coli O157:H7 from drinking water in Bangladesh [44] and in USA and Canada [45]. Schets et al. [22] isolated E. coli O157:H7 from 2.7% of samples in the Netherlands that otherwise met the drinking water standards. Momba et al. [44] reported that about 26% of their drinking water samples were positive for E. coli O157 in South Africa. Olsen et al. [21] reported that a large outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 infection which occurred in Wyoming, USA, was significantly associated with drinking municipal water. In fact, several outbreaks due to E. coli O157:H7 were strongly linked to the consumption of drinking water [46].

Wastewater would seep into the surrounding soil, eventually finding its way into drinking water through faulty water distribution lines. Interruptions of drinking water supply in Addis Ababa occur frequently. Resumption of supply would create negative pressures that would result in a suction effect inside the pipe, and pathogens in the surrounding would be sucked into the system through pipe leaks as observed by Collins and Boxall [9]. According to Ameya et al. [5]. , incorrect cross-connection with sewer lines, interconnection with toilets, pipe corrosion, and pipe breakage could lead to the infiltration of bacterial contaminants into water distribution lines. For this reason, Rashid et al. [47] recommended the use of chlorine tablets at point-of-use tabs to effectively inactivate V. cholerae from drinking water in households.

The contamination of drinking water by sewage was reported by Kwesiga et al. [14] in Western Uganda, which resulted in prolonged community-wide cholera outbreak. Shah et al. [48] found ten leakages in the drinking water pipelines of the affected areas during a cholera epidemic, caused by V. cholerae in Lalpur town, India. El-Leithy et al. [49] isolated E. coli O157:H7 from wastewater. Outbreaks of hemorrhagic colitis were linked to wastewater containing E. coli O157:H7 [50].

(Table 1)

Our V. cholerae O1 isolates exhibited different levels of resistance to the β-lactam antibiotics considered in this study: 100% resistance to two penicillins (Amoxicillin and Ampicillin), 51–82% resistance to the cephalosporins. About 44% of the isolates in this study were ESBL producers. Moreover, 23% were resistant to the only carbapenem, Meropenem, tested in this study and, possibly, could be carbapenemase producing strains. According to Goh [51], carbapenem-resistant Vibrio isolates have been identified in all continents and once carbapenem resistance is acquired among Vibrio isolates, the resistance genes may disseminate to other bacteria through mobile genetic elements and rapidly amplify the development of carbapenem resistance. Peperacillin/Tazobactam was the only effective β-lactam antibiotic against V. cholerae O1 in this study, because of its Tazobactam component, a β-lactamase inhibitor. (Table 2).

Table 2 Antimicrobial resistance of V. cholerae O1 isolated from drinking water and wastewater
Full size table

Resistance to the Cephalosporins, Ciprofloxacin, Tetracycline and the Carbapenem (Meropenem) was much higher than that reported in other studies [28,29,30, 41].the V. cholera O1 strains in this study were, however, less resistant (69%) to Trimethprim Sulphamethoxazole than those of Garbern et al. [28] and Awuor et al. [42] which showed ≥ 99% resistance to the drug. Previous isolates of V. cholera O1 from Addis Ababa were sensitive to Tetracycline and Trimethprim/Sulphamethoxazole [18], whereas between 64% and 69% of the isolates in this study, respectively, were resistant to the two drugs.

(Table 2)

Our E. coli O157:H7 isolates showed varying levels of resistance to the nine antibiotic classes used in the study. About 71% were ESBL producing isolates (Table 3). Resistance to the β-lactam antibiotic Ampicillin was 96%. High degree of resistance of E. coli O157:H7 to Ampicillin was also reported by various authors [31, 32]. Resistance to Amoxycillin/Clavulanic acid and Ambicillin/Sulbactam was relatively lower (33% and 64%, respectively). Higher degree of resistance was, however, observed to Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid in other studies [25, 32], Both Aminoglycosides (Amikacin and Gentamicin) were very effective against the isolates in this study. Similar low resistance to Gentamicin was also reported by Hamid et al. [52] and Heydari et al. [53].

Table 3 Antimicrobial resistance of E. coli O157:H7 (n = 28) isolated from drinking water and wastewater
Full size table

However, about 9% and 86% resistance to Gentamicin were reported Heydari et al. [52] and Haile et al. [25], respectively. Resistance to the Carbapenem (imipenem) and Cephalosporin (Ceftriaxone) is building up (29% and 18%, respectively) (Table 3) resulting in 28.6% of Carbapenem resistance. Yandag et al. [54] and Heyderi et al. [51] detected no resistance against Imipenem. Resistance to Ceftriaxone by isolates from water sources in Nigeria was 100% [32] whereas Haile et al. [25] reported no resistance to the drug. Unlike the isolates in this study, those of Tula et al. [32] showed complete resistance (100%) to Trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole, Ampicillin, Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid and nalidixic acid.

Multi-drug resistance (MDR) patterns of V. cholerae O1 and E. coli O157:H7 isolates

Our 39 V. cholera O1 isolates showed 37 different patterns of multiple antibiotic resistance against three to ten drugs. According to Jubyda et al. [43], V. cholerae strains differed in their antibiotic resistance pattern with a majority (97%) being multi-drug resistant to up to eleven of the eighteen antibiotics tested. This extreme drug resistant strain carried resistance-related genes that code for extended-spectrum β-lactamases [43]. The MAR index ranged from 0.3 to 0.8. Index values greater than 0.2 indicate that the origin of an isolate is a source where antibiotics are used to a great degree and/or in large amounts [39]. This would mean that, in the study areas considered in this study, antibiotics are accumulated in wastewater and, eventually in drinking water contaminated therewith. Igere et al. [55], determined the MDR of V. cholerae against 31 antibiotics and observed 33 MDR patterns consisting of nine to 23 drugs, with MAR index ranging from 0.03 to 0.5. Agboola et al. [56] isolated V, cholerae from hospital wastewater which showed multiple resistance against five to eight different antibiotic drugs with MAR index ranging from 0.4 to 0.6.

Although we noted 37 different patterns of multiple antibiotic resistance in V, cholerae O1 isolates, there were few repeating segments within the patterns. The most frequently appearing segments were AML/AMP/AZM (48.7%); CRO/CAZ/NA (38.5%); AML/AMP/AZM/SXT (30.7%); CAZ/CRO/NA/TE (23.1%); and AML/AMP/AZM/FOX/SXT (23.1%). The single V.cholerae O1 isolate from drinking water collected from Addis Ketema sub-city was not multiple drug resistant. Those from drinking water collected from Akaki/Kality sub-city, however, showed a higher magnitude of multiple drug resistance, mostly resistance to six to nine drugs (Table 4). This indicates that drinking water in distribution lines in Akaki/Kality sub-city is more prone to contamination from environmental sources.

Table 4 Multiple drug resistance patterns of V. cholerae O1 and E. coli O157:H7 isolated from drinking water
Full size table

About 89% of the E. coli O157:H7 isolates from wastewater and drinking water showed MDR against three to eight antibiotic drugs. Resistance to up to 12 drugs was reported by Tula et al. [32]. Lower proportions (31–68%) of MDR E. coli O157:H7 isolates were reported by various authors [24, 25, 32, 50]. Four each of the isolates in this study were resistant to four and five drugs. Most patterns (89%) were different from one another. Five were resistant to three drugs, and the most frequent pattern was AMP/SAM/SXT.

The presence of V. cholerae O1 and E. coli O157:H7 in drinking water samples (Table 4) exposes residents of the study areas to recurring disease that could be fatal, particularly to vulnerable members of households. Moreover, multiple antibiotic-resistant pathogens, when introduced to the human gut, would result in further conjugal transfer of plasmids, that carry antibiotic resistance genes, to the normal gut microbiota. The gut would, thus, be a permanent source of MDR microorganisms to the individual and the environment [57]. According to Ceccarelli et al. [58], enteric pathogens release β-lactam resistant genes to the environment and V. cholerae has the ability to acquire new genetic information therefrom through horizontal gene transfer mechanisms.

An E. coli O157:H7 isolate from drinking water samples was multiple drug resistant to eight drugs. More than half were resistant only to three drugs. AMC/AMP/SAM and AMP/SAM/SXT appeared more frequently than the other patterns. Multiple antibiotic resistance index of the E. coli O157:H7 strains isolated from wastewater and drinking water ranged from 0.3 to 0.8. The MAR index of isolates from drinking water ranged between 0.2 and 0.7 (Table 4). Different multiple antibiotic resistance indices were reported for E. coli O157:H7: 0.2 to 0.7 [59] and 0.6 to 1.0 [60].

Similarly, the V. cholerae O1 isolates from drinking water samples collected from Addis Ketema sub-city manifested MDR against three to seven antibiotic drugs (MARI, 0.2-0.05). However, those isolates from samples collected from Akaki/Kality sub-city showed MDR against five to nine drugs (MARI, 0.4, 0.8) (Table 4). This indicates that drinking water in Akaki/Kality sub-city is more contaminated with MDR V. cholerae O1 strains than that in Addis Ketema sub-city.

The MAR pattern as well as the indices of all V. cholerae O1 and E. coli O157:H7 isolates, including those from wastewater samples, are given in annex 1 and 2.

Conclusion

Previous cholera outbreaks were reported from all sub-cities at different times. This study addressed only a few woredas in only two sub-cities. It has, however, shown that open ditches for wastewater conveyance along innner roads in residence areas and underground faulty municipal water distribution lines could be major sources for V. cholerae O1 and E. coli O157:H7 infections to surrounding households. The isolation of both pathogens, particularly from point-of-use drinking water taps, makes the quality of municipal drinking water in the city questionable. Thus, consumers may be advised to treat drinking water immediately after collection from point-of-use taps by boiling or adding other treatment chemicals before consumption or storage. On the other hand, it is crucial to manage open sewer ditches by communities and occasionally check the integrity of drinking water distribution lines by the responsible government bodies to achieve the ‘Multi-sectorial Cholera Elimination Plan, Ethiopia 2021–2028’, which targets to end cholera by 2030 as part of the Global Roadmap [61].

Data availability

Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

References

  1. UN. The sustainable development goal report. United Nations Department Economic Social Affairs. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18356/214e6642-en.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. Guidelines on sanitation and health. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

  3. Prest E, Hammes F, van Loosdrecht M, Vrouwenvelder J. Biological stability of drinking water: controlling factors, methods, and challenges. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:45. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00045.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheeba G, Jalagam A, Venkatasubramanian P. Drinking water contamination from peri-urban Bengaluru, India. Curr Sci. 2017;113(9):1702–9. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v113/i09/1702-1709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ameya G, Zewdie O, Mussema A, Amante A, Asmera B. Bacteriological quality of drinking water obtained from main sources, reservoirs and consumers’ tap in Arba Minch town, Southern Ethiopia. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2018;12(24):567–73. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2018.8871.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Asefa Y, Alemu B, Baraki N, Mekbib D, Mengistu D. Bacteriological quality of drinking water from source and point-of-use and associated factors among households in Eastern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(10):e0258806. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258806.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferdous J, Sultana R, Rashid R, Tasnimuzzaman M, Nordland A, Begum A, Jensen P. A comparative analysis of Vibrio cholerae Contamination in Point-of-Drinking and source water in a low-income Urban Community, Bangladesh. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:489. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00489.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Saima S, Ferdous J, Sultana R, Rashid R, Almeida S, Begum A, Jensen M. Detecting enteric pathogens in low-risk drinking water in Dhaka, Bangladesh: an Assessment of the WHO Water Safety categories. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023;8:321. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8060321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Collins R, Boxall J. Influence of Ground conditions on Intrusion flows through apertures in distribution pipes. J Hydraul Eng -ASCE. 2013;139:1052–61. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fontanazzaa C, Notarob V, Puleob V, Nicolosia P, Freni F. Contaminant intrusion through leaks in water distribution system: experimental analysis. Procedia Eng. 2015;119:426–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kristanti R, Hadibarata T, Syafrudin M, Yılmaz M, Abdullah S. Microbiological Contaminants in drinking Water: current Status and challenges. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022;233:299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05698-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rai K, Rai S, Bhatt D, Kurokuwa M, Ono K, Magar T. Study of medically important vibrios in the sewage of Katmandu Valley, Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J. 2012;14(3):212–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rafique R, Rashid M, Monira S, Rahman Z, Mahmud M, Mustafiz M, Saif-Ur-Rahman K, Johura F, Islam S, Parvin T, Bhuyian M, Sharif M, Rahman S, Sack D, Sack R, George C, Alam M. Transmission of infectious Vibrio cholerae through drinking Water among the Household contacts of Cholera patients (CHoBI7 trial). Front Microbio. 2016;7:1635. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwesiga B, Pande G, Ario A, Tumwesigye N, Matovu J, Zhu B. A prolonged, community-wide cholera outbreak associated with drinking water contaminated by sewage in Kasese District, western Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4589-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eurien D, Mirembe B, Musewa A, Kisaakye E, Kwesiga B, Ogole F, Ayen D, Kadobera D, Bulage L, Ario A, Zhu B. Cholera outbreak caused by drinking unprotected well water contaminated with faeces from an open storm water drainage: Kampala City, Uganda, January 2019. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:1281. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-07011-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rashid A, Haley B, Rajabov M. Detection of Vibrio cholerae in environmental waters including drinking water reservoirs of Azerbaijan. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2013;5(1):30–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2012.00369.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Asumah M, Padhi B, Sinha A. Rising cases of cholera in Ethiopia: a need for sustainable wash practices? Int J surg (London England). 2023;109(3):608–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Endris A, Addissie A, Ahmed M, Abagero A, Techane B, Tadesse M. Epidemiology of Cholera Outbreak and Summary of the preparedness and response activities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2016. J Environ Public Health. 2022;4671719. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4671719.

  19. Tadesse T, Zawdie B. Cholera Outbreak Investigation in four districts of Kirkos sub-city in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case-control study. Pathol Lab Med. 2020;4(1):7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dinede G, Abagero A, Tolosa T. Cholera outbreak in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0235440. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235440.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Olsen S, Miller G, Breuer T, Kennedy M, Higgins C, Walford J, McKee G, Fox K, Bibb W, Mead P. A waterborne outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections and hemolytic uremic syndrome: implications for Rural Water systems. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(4):370–5. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0804.000218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Schets F, During M, Italiaande R, Heijnen L, Rutjes S, van der Zwaluw W, de Roda Husman A. Escherichia coli O157:H7 in drinking water from private water supplies in the Netherlands. Water Res. 2005;39(18):4485–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.08.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ngwa G, Schop R, Weir S, León-Velarde C, Odumeru J. Detection and enumeration of E. Coli O157:H7 in water samples by culture and molecular methods. J Microbiol Methods. 2013;92(2):164–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2012.11.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abayneh M, Tekalign E. Occurrence of Multi-drug Resistant Escherichia coli and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in meat and swab samples of various contact surfaces at Abattoir and Butcher shops in Jimma Town, Southwest District of Ethiopia. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;3853–62. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S277890.

  25. Haile A, Alonso S, Berhe N, Atoma T, Boyaka P, Grace D. Prevalence, Antibiogram, and Multidrug-Resistant Profile of E. Coli O157: H7 in Retail Raw Beef in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:734896. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.734896.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Abebe E, Gugsa G, Ahmed M, Awol N, Tefera Y, Abegaz S, Sisay T. Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of E. Coli O157:H7 isolated from foods of bovine origin in Dessie and Kombolcha towns, Ethiopia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17(1):e0010706. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Abunna F, Yimana M, Waketole H, Beyene T, Megersa B. Detection and Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of E. Coli O157:H7 from slaughterhouses and Butcher shops in Bishoftu Town, Central Oromia, Ethiopia. J Food Microbiol Saf Hyg. 2023;8:189. https://doi.org/10.35248/2476-2059.23.8.189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Garbern S, Chu T-C, Yang P, Gainey M, Nasrin S, Kanekar S, Qu K, Nelson E, Leung D, Ahmed D, Schmid C, Alam N, Levine A. Clinical and socio-environmental determinants of multidrug-resistant Vibrio cholerae 01 in older children and adults in Bangladesh. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;105:436–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yuan X, Li Y, Vaziri A, Kaviar V, JinY, Maleki A, Omidi N, Kouhsari E. Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022;11:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nateghizad H, Sajadi R, Shivaee A, Shirazi O, Sharifian M, Tadi D, Amini K. Resistance of Vibrio cholerae to antibiotics that inhibit cell wall synthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1027277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1027277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Fashina C, Ayemoba I, Oladosu A. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Enterohaemorrhagic E. Coli (EHEC O157:H7) in raw beef samples collected from abattoirs and meat vendors in Ile Ife and its environs, South-West, Nigeria. Am J Pathol Res. 2022;1(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tula M, Enabulele O, Ophori E. Occurrence and antibiotic resistance profile of shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) from sources of water in Mubi Region, Adamawa State, Nigeria. Public Health Toxicol. 2023;3(3):15. https://doi.org/10.18332/pht/172303.

  33. Das B, Verma J, Kumar P, Ghosh A, Ramamurthy T. Antibiotic resistance in Vibrio cholerae: understanding the ecology of resistance genes and mechanisms. Vaccine. 2020;38(1):A83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. CDC Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis. of Epidemic Dysentery and Cholera.1999; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, Georgia.

  35. Omar K, Barnard T. Detection of diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli in clinical and environmental water sources in South Africa using single-step 11-gene m-PCR. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;30(10):2663–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-014-1690-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. March S, Ratnam S. 1986. Sorbitol-MacConkey Medium for Detection of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 Associated with Hemorrhagic Colitis. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23(5):869 – 72. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.23.5.869-872.1986.

  37. CLSI. Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria. 3rd edition. CLSI Guideline M45. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, 2015.

  38. CLSI. Performance standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 33rd edition. CLSI Supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, 2023.

  39. Krumperman PH. Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;46(1):165–70. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.46.1.165-70.1983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Pereckaite L, Tatarunas V, Giedraitiene A. Current antimicrobial susceptibility testing for beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in clinical settings. J Microbiol Methods. 2018;152:154–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.07.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mohammed Y, Aboderin AO, Okeke IN, Olayinka AT. Antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio cholerae from Sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review. Afr J Lab Med. 2018;7(2):a778. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v7i2.778.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Awuor SO, Omwenga EO, Daud II. Geographical distribution and antibiotics susceptibility patterns of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae isolates from Kisumu County, Kenya. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1):e1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jubyda FT, Nahar KS, Barman I, et al. Vibrio cholerae O1 associated with recent endemic cholera shows temporal changes in serotype, genotype, and drug-resistance patterns in Bangladesh. Gut Pathog. 2023;15(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-023-00537-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Momba MNB, Abong’o BO, Mwambakana JN. Prevalence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: H7 in drinking water and its predicted impact on diarrhoeic HIV/AIDS patients in the Amathole District, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Water SA. 2008;34(3):365–72. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v34i3.180631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chekabab SM, Paquin-Veillette J, Dozois CM, Harel J. The ecological habitat and transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;341(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hunter PR. Drinking water and diarrhoeal disease due to Escherichia coli. J Water Health. 2003;1(2):65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rashid MU, George CM, Monira S, Mahmud T, Rahman Z, Mustafiz M, Saif-Ur-Rahman KM, Parvin T, Bhuyian SI, Zohura F, Begum F, Biswas SK, Akhter S, Zhang X, Sack D, Sack RB, Alam M. Chlorination of Household drinking Water among Cholera patients’ households to prevent transmission of Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae in Dhaka, Bangladesh: CHoBI7 trial. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95(6):1299–304. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Shah HD, Shah VP, Desai AN. An epidemic outbreak of Vibrio Cholerae El Tor 01 serotype ogawa biotype in a Lalpur town, Jamnagar, India. J Postgrad Med. 2012;58:14–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.93247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. El-Leithy M, El- Shatoury E, Abou-Zeid M, Hemdan B, Samhan F, El-Taweel G. Survival of Enterotoxigenic E. Coli O157: H7 strains in different water sources. Int J Environ. 2014;3(4):212–20.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Boening D, Tarr P. Proposed method for isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from environmental samples. J Environ Health. 1995;57(8):19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Goh J, Tan L, Law J, Khaw K, Ab Mutalib N, He Y, Goh B, Chan K, Lee L, Letchumanan V. Insights into Carbapenem Resistance in Vibrio species: current status and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:12486. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hamid M, Tefera Y, Eguale T, Worku Y. Escherichia coli O157:H7: prevalence, identification and antimicrobial resistance in cattle Slaughter at Addis Ababa Municipal Abattior, Ethiopia. Int J Adv Res Biol Sci. 2018;5(10):136–46. https://doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2018.05.10.014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Heydari FE, Bonyadian M, Moshtaghi H, Sami M. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance profile of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from diarrheal samples. Iran J Microbiol. 2020;12(4):289–95. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v12i4.3931.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Yandag M, Tsend-Ayush A, Gunregjav N, Erdenebayar O, Byambadorj B, Juniichiro N, Jav S. Detection and antibiotic resistance of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli from patients with diarrhea in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023;17:202–9. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.17256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Igere BE, Okoh AI, Nwodo UU. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) reports: a basis for Environmental/Epidemiological Surveillance and Infection Control Amongst Environmental Vibrio cholerae. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5685. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Agboola TD, Nmema EE, Odetoyin BW. Distribution and antibiogram of Vibrio species from hospital wastewater in Southwest, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2023;45:80. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2023.45.80.35773.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. McKeon DM, Calabrae JP, Bissonnette GJ. Antibiotic resistant gram-negative bacteria in rural groundwater supplies. Water Resour. 1995;29:1902–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(95)00013-B.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ceccarelli D, Alam M, Huq A, Colwell R. Reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum β-Lactams in Vibrio cholerae isolated in Bangladesh. Front Public Health. 2016;4:231. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Iwu C, Plessis E, Korsten L, Okoh A. Antibiogram imprints of E. Coli O157:H7 recovered from irrigation water and agricultural soil samples collected from two district municipalities in South Africa. Int J Environ Stud. 2021;78(6):940–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2020.1854522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Oluyege J, Adeoye M, Olowe B. Water quality assessment and plasmid analysis of multiple antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli O157:H7 from well-water sources in ado-ekiti metropolis, Nigeria. Water Supply. 2019;19(4):1246–52. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2018.183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. EPHI. Multi-sectorial cholera elimination plan. Ethiopian Public Health Institute. 2021; Ethiopia 2021–2028. Addis Ababa.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Girmay Medhin in statistical analysis of the data. The first author acknowledges the financial assistance by Dr. M.M.A. (Pittsburg, USA). The technical assistance from the laboratory staff of the Microbiology laboratory at ALIPB is acknowledged.

Funding

This article is part of a Ph.D. dissertation by the first author. Partial financial support was obtained from Addis Ababa University. Most expenses associated with field visits, procurement of most culture media and payment for technical assistance were borne by the first author. The authors did not receive any other funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Microbiology Research Unit, Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Helina Mogessie, Mengistu Legesse, Aklilu Feleke Hailu, Tilahun Teklehaymanot & Haile Alemayehu

  2. Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Bacteriology Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Rajiha Abubeker

  3. Center for Food Security Studies, College of Development Studies, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Mogessie Ashenafi

Authors
  1. Helina Mogessie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mengistu Legesse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aklilu Feleke Hailu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tilahun Teklehaymanot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Haile Alemayehu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rajiha Abubeker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mogessie Ashenafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.M.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data Collection, Investigation, Analysis, Writing – Original Draft. M.L.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Review & Editing. A.F.: Review & Editing. T.T.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Review & Editing. H.A.: Methodology. R.A. Methodology. M.A. Conceptualization, Methodology, Analysis, Supervision, Writing, Review & Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helina Mogessie.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethical Review Board of Aklilu Lema Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University. Permission was obtained from the Administrations and Health Bureau of the respective sub cities to get access to Woreda Health Centers and the community. Informed consent was obtained from participants and their anonymity was maintained.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mogessie, H., Legesse, M., Hailu, A.F. et al. Vibrio cholerae O1 and Escherichia coli O157:H7 from drinking water and wastewater in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Microbiol 24, 219 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03302-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03302-8

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us