Skip to main content

Isolation and in-vitro characterization of extracellular phytase producing bacterial isolates for potential application in poultry feed



Phytase catalyses the breakdown of complex organic forms of phosphorous into simpler forms by sequential hydrolysis of phosphate ester bonds to liberate the inorganic phosphate. Supplementation of feeds with bacterial phytase therefore could enhance the bioavailability of phosphorus and micronutrients. Hence, the aim of this study was to isolate and characterize phytase producing bacteria from rhizosphere soil, fresh poultry excreta, and cattle shed to evaluate their potential in improving poultry feeds. Phytase producing bacteria were isolated using wheat bran extract medium.


A total of 169 bacterial isolates were purified and screened for phytase activity. Out of these, 36 were confirmed as positive for phytase enzyme activity. The bacterial isolates were identified by cultural, morphological, and biochemical features. The isolates were also identified by using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. The bacterial isolates (RS1, RS8, RS10 and RS15) were provided with gene bank database accession numbers of MZ407562, MZ407563, MZ407564 and MZ407565 respectively. All isolates increased phytase production when cultured in wheat bran extract medium (pH 6) supplemented with 1% (wt/v) galactose and 1% (wt/v) ammonium sulphate incubated at 50oC for 72 h. Proximate composition analysis after supplementation of phytase showed that phytase supplementation improved bioavailability of phosphorus, calcium, potassium and sodium in poultry feed.


Overall, this study showed that the nutritional value of poultry feed can be improved using microbial phytase enzyme which reduces the cost of supplementation with inorganic phosphate.

Peer Review reports


Poultry is an agricultural practice in which domesticated and commercialized types of birds are kept and managed for production of egg and meat for humans. It provides nutritionally beneficial foods that contain high-quality protein accompanied by a low proportion of fat [1,2,3]. The demand for protein-rich food is gradually increasing with improvements of society’s income and population growth. Poultry products are crucial sources of edible animal protein [3]. To achieve food self-sufficiency and to combat malnutrition in developing countries we must give emphasis for poultry production [2]. Poultry feed is a fundamental need for chicken production and account 60–70% of production costs under intensive production systems [4]. Poultry feed is the uppermost constraint because lack of processing facilities, inconsistent availability and distribution and sub-standard quality of processed feeds during poultry processes in both small holder and large-scale systems [5].

Poultry production is seriously constrained by poor quality poultry nutrition due to large quantity of phosphorus in grain based poultry diet existing in phytate-bound form. As a result, the poultry cannot use bound form of phosphorus due to absence of phytase enzyme in their gastro-intestinal tract [6]. Subsequently, a good amount of phytate in the diet consumed by chickens is excreted resulting in environmental pollution during application of manure to agricultural fields.

This chelated phosphorus in feeds demands the poultry keepers to use high-priced inorganic phosphate in the poultry feed [6]. Phytate also reduces bioavailability of some important cations and is known to reduce digestibility of protein. To overcome these problems during intensive livestock production, food, and feed can be supplemented with phytase for improving phosphorous bioavailability and reducing phosphorous excretion [7].

Phytase is abundantly found in nature and derived from living things. Phytase enzyme from microorganisms can improve poultry feed, making the poultry farm economically useful and minimizing environmental pollution. A few principal phytase producing microorganisms include Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium sp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Schwannoiomy cescastelii [8]. Microbial origins are predominately promising for a massive production of phytase enzyme at a marketable and profitable scale [9] for its potential in biotechnological applications [10]. In this study, the phytase-producing bacteria were isolated from rhizosphere soils, fresh poultry excreta and cattle shed samples and the enzyme was characterized for poultry feed improvement.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

The sampling areas for the current study were selected based on potential poultry and their proximity where the accumulation of phytase producing bacteria was suspected. Samples were collected randomly (X-fashion) sampling method from different sites within the premises of Addis Ababa Science and Technology (AASTU) parameters. Total of 60 samples were gathered. Those are 20 rhizospheric soil samples from common cereal crops (Maize, Wheat, Teff, and Sorghum) and 30 Rhizospheric soil samples from legumes (chickpea, cowpea, field pea, grass pea, faba bean, and lentil) and five fresh poultry excreta samples were obtained from Addis Ababa area. Five cattle shed samples were gathered from Bishoftu area. In this study, samples were aseptically collected by using sterile spatula and plastic bottle. Fresh samples were transported to the microbiology laboratory using ice box and stored at 4oC until use.

Preparation of wheat bran extract medium

Twenty five kilo gram (25 kg) wheat bran was collected from Charily Feed Factory Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A mass of 1 kg oven dehydrated and pounded wheat bran was suspended in a solution of 10 L of distilled water and a 50 mL of H2SO4 and after that autoclaved at 121oC for 20 min. The fluid fractions were separated by 47 mm pore size filtration and using 1 N of NaOH solution or HCL the pH was adjusted to 6.5. Finally the wheat bran extract was obtained by the removal of water at 50 °C under reduced pressure [11].

Isolation and screening of phytase producing bacteria

Ten gram of each sample was separately suspended in 90 ml of sterile distilled water and each samples suspension was serially diluted (10− 1 up to 10− 6 fold). Modified Luria broth (LB) agar medium with wheat bran extract was prepared by using yeast extract 5 g/L, peptone 10 g/L, NaCl 10 g/L, Agar 20 g/L, in 1000 mL of wheat bran extract, final pH adjusted to 7. Each sample suspension (100 μl) was inoculated and spread over the modified Luria broth agar media. Plates were cultured aerobically at 28 °C for 72 h. Suspected isolates were picked up and sub-cultured to purify all isolates [12].

All isolates were screened by re-culturing each of the pure colonies on newly optimized Wheat bran extract agar medium using 0.04%±0.01 (w/v) of (NH4)2SO4, 0.02%±0.01 (w/v) of MgSO4.7H2O, 0.1%±0.01(w/v) of Casein, 0.05%±0.03 (w/v) of KH2PO4, 0.04%±0.02 (w/v) of K2HPO4 and 2%±0.04(w/v) of agar with 1000 ml distilled water, pH 6.5. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 72 h aerobically. Typical colonies which form a clear zone were considered as potential phytase producers. The diameters of halo (Z) and diameters of colony (C) were measured using a caliper. The hydrolysis efficiency of the isolates was determined via the formula Z-C/ C. Isolates above 50% effectiveness were selected and transferred into nutrient agar slant, mixed with 15% glycerol, then stored at 4oC for further activities [13].

Characterization and identification of the selected isolates cultural, morphological, and biochemical characterizations

The four promising phytase producing isolates (RS1, RS8, RS10 and RS15 were subjected to cultural, morphological and various biochemical tests following standard methods [14]. It was further identified up to the genus level according to Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology.

Molecular identification and sequencing

DNA was extracted according to the methods using proteinase K digestion in a lysis buffer via phenol-chloroform extraction method [15]. To extract genomic DNA the putative bacterial isolates, RS1, RS8, RS10 and RS15 were cultured in Wheat Bran Extract broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs in an orbital shaker at 200 rpm. PCR amplification was carried out using 16S rDNAuniversalprimers8f [(Forward primer: 5’AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG 3’) and 1492r (Reverse primer: 5’ GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT3’)] in an Eppendorf Thermo cycler. The quality PCR products were sent to Leibiz institute DSMZ (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen Zellkulturen) Braunschweig, Germany for sequencing. Sequenced data were edited using Bio Edit Sequence Alignment Editor (Version and Mega x version 10.1.5 software was used for sequence alignments and the construction of phylogenetic trees respectively.

Crude phytase enzyme extraction

To obtain crude enzyme, the potent isolates were subjected to fermentation in a Wheat Bran Extract Broth Medium containing gram/Litter: (NH4)2SO4 (0.04%±0.01), MgSO4.7H2O (0.02%±0.01), Casein (0.1%±0.01), KH2PO4 (0.05%±0.03), and K2HPO4 (0.04 ± 0.02%). Before sterilization the pH of the medium was adjusted to 6.5. The inoculated medium was incubated on an orbital shaker incubator (200 rpm) at 370 C for 72 h. After 72 h aliquots of 50 mL of the fermented broths from the flasks were taken and centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 30 min at room temperature. The supernatants were used as crude enzyme solution [16].

Phytase enzyme purification

Partial purification of extracted phytase was done by the use of ammonium sulphate precipitation followed by dialysis. Cell free extract of 50 ml from each isolates was saturated with 20–60% of ammonium sulphate. The contents were incubated overnight and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. Supernatant from each isolate was collected and checked for enzyme activity; pellets were collected for further analysis. The enzyme mixture (pellet) from each isolate was transferred to dialysis tube and immersed in 2mM Tris- HCl buffer at pH-7 at 4 °C for 24 h for dialysis.

Phytase enzyme activity

Quantification of phytase activity was determined by ferrous sulphate molybdenum blue method for detecting free inorganic phosphate [17]. To obtain cell free supernatant (CFS) from each culture grown in wheat bran medium, 2 ml was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4oC. From each isolate 0.2 ml of the CFS was mixed with 0.16 ml of substrate solution containing 0.1 M tris-HCl, 2 mM sodium phytate and 2mM CaCl2. The mix was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 2 ml of 5% (v/v) of trichloro acetic acid followed by the addition of 2000 μl of colouring reagent. Coloring reagent was freshly prepared by mixing 4 volumes of 1.5% (w/v) ammonium molybdate with 5.5% (v/v) sulfuric acid and 1 volume of 2.7% (w/v) ferrous sulfate solution. Then absorbance was at 700 nm was measured. By using different concentrations of di potassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO) as a standard, the quantity of inorganic phosphorous released was estimated.

The phytase activities (IU/ml of CFS) were defined as the micromoles of inorganic phosphate liberated in one minute. Phytase activity IU/ml = K*OD *f /S*M*30.

K is slope of standard curve, OD is optical density, f is dilution multiple, S is amount of sample (0.2 ml) used and M is sample weight (0.06).

Optimization of phytase production

Effect of nitrogen

The effect of nitrogen on phytase production was done by addition of 1% (w/w) different nitrogen sources (ammonium nitrate, sodium nitrate, ammonium sulphate, peptone and urea) in different wheat bran extract medium aliquots and selected bacterial isolates fermented at 370 C for 72 h. The fermented broth was collected and centrifuged. Then supernatants were used to estimate phytase activity [16].

Effect of carbon

The effect of carbon on phytase production was done by addition of1% (w/w) of different carbon sources (glucose, sucrose, galactose and starch) in different wheat bran extract medium aliquots and the bacterial isolates were fermented at 370 C for 72 h. The fermented broth was collected and centrifuged. Then supernatants were used to estimate phytase activity [16].

Effects of incubation period

To optimize incubation period for the maximum phytase production of selected experimental isolates were determined by growing each isolate separately in wheat bran extract medium at 37 °C and pH 6.5. The experiments were carried out individually for 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. The enzyme assays were carried out at each time interval [16].

Effects of inoculum size

Phytase producing isolates were inoculated (10% dilution of 24 h old culture) in to Wheat bran extract medium in 250 ml flasks at different inoculum levels (0.1mL, 0.2ml, 0.4ml, 0.6ml, 0.8ml, and 1ml) respectively. The optical density (OD) was measured after 24 h [16].

Effects of pH

The effects of pH on phytase production using wheat bran extract medium and selected bacterial isolates was studied by conducting fermentation at pH values of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 for 72 h. The fermented broth was collected and centrifuged. Then supernatants of fermented broths after centrifugation were used to estimate phytase activity [16].

Effects of temperature

The effects of temperature on phytase production using wheat bran extract medium by bacterial isolates was analysed by setting the fermentation at different temperatures (35, 40, 45, 50, 55 and 60 °C) along with arbitrary control at 37 °C for 72 h.

Proximate composition of commercial poultry feed before and after addition of phytase enzyme

Both poultry feed from commercial (well-mixed) and poultry feed from commercial with experimental phytase were sent to Bless Agri-food Laboratory Services P.L.C and Ethiopian Public Health Institute (Addis Ababa, Ethiopian) for the proximate composition analysis of crude enzyme, phosphorus, calcium, sodium, and potassium.

Determination of crude enzyme

The macro Kjeldahl method was implemented to determine the crude enzyme content according to the methods of AOAC [18].

Mineral determination

Poultry feed used to determine the mineral contents was obtained from Akaki commercial centre, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Samples of commercial poultry feed were extracted to analyze minerals (sodium, potassium, calcium and phosphorus) and then estimated as follows. Before and after addition of experimental phytase enzymes, the minerals were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry (SP-AA 5000) for calcium. Flame photometry was applied for sodium and potassium. Spectrophotometric assay was used for the phosphorus. Determination of minerals was performed according to the methods of AOAC [18].

Data analysis

All the experiments were carried out independently in triplicate. Generated data in laboratory were analyzed in the form of Mean ± Standard deviation (SD) using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 and Microsoft Excel 2010. Duncan’s Multiple Range-Test was used to test differences among means. Statistical significance between mean values was set at (P˂0.05). Bio Edit version and Mega x version 10.1.5 software were used for sequences alignments and phylogentic tree analysis respectively.


Screening of purified isolates for phytase production

From three different sample sources such as rhizosphere soil, cattle shed and fresh poultry excreta sample sources, 169 isolates were selected out of which 36 isolates showed positive for phytase production (Table 1; Fig. 1).

Table 1 Total number of phytase producing isolates and their frequency as a percentage (%) of total isolates

Based on the clear zone of hydrolysis produced by the isolates on wheat bran extract medium we found rings from the least 10 mm to the largest 32 mm. From 36 positive isolates, 16 isolates produced large clear zone of hydrolysis (≥10 mm) and were tested further. From the 16 isolates, 4 bacterial isolates producing clear zones (30 up to 32 mm) were chosen for this study (Table 2).

Table 2 The efficiency of phytase producing bacterial isolates selected from rhizospheric soil legumes using wheat bran agar media

Bacterial isolates A (RS1) and C (RS10) were from grass pea and faba bean field respectively. Whereas as isolate B (RS 8) and D (RS15) were cultured from Lentil soil using wheat bran extract agar media (Fig. 1) below.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The clear zone hydrolysis efficiency of four phytase producing isolates [A (RS1), C (RS10), B (RS 8), and D (RS15)] originated from the same location

Characterization and identification of the selected phytase producing bacterial isolates

Cultural, morphological and biochemical test characteristics for the four bacterial isolates (RS1, RS8, RS10 and RS15) are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Cultural, morphological and biochemical test characteristics of the selected isolates

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification 16 S rRNA from the selected isolates

Amplification of the 16s rRNA genes from the genomic DNA of bacterial isolates RS1, RS8, RS10 and RS15 with bacterial specific universal primers for 16 S rRNA generated 1500 bp of PCR product (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Amplified 16 S rDNA of the four bacterial isolates and the control run in 0.8% (w/v) of agarose gel: M- 1 kb DNA ladder, 1–4 showed the 1500 bp 16 S rRNA genes of RS1, RS8, RS10 and RS 15 respectively

Identification based on 16 S rRNA sequences

The sequenced 16s rRNA amplicons of the four pure selected bacterial isolates RS1, RS8, RS10 and RS15 were submitted to NCBI GenBank database and assigned accession numbers as MZ407562, MZ407563, MZ407564 and MZ407565 respectively. The 16 S rRNA partial gene sequences were analysed using NCBI BLAST program, phylogenetic tree was constructed, and the nucleotide homology based dendrogram is indicated (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenetic tree of selected bacterial isolates based on 16 S rRNA sequences

Phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial strain RS1 (MZ407562), RS8 (MZ407563), RS10 (MZ407564) and RS15 (MZ407565) was made in comparison with other closely related bacterial strains retrieved from NCBI Gen Bank. Similarity and homology of neighbouring sequences has been shown by the robustness tree determined by the analysis of 1000 time’s bootstrap values between them.

Crude and purified phytase enzyme activity

During sub-merged fermentation, isolated bacteria were producing high amounts of total crude enzyme, crude enzyme activity and partially purified enzyme activities (Table 4).

Table 4 Levels of total crude enzyme, crude enzyme activity and partially purified phytase activities from isolated species (Mean ± Standard deviation)

Optimization for phytase production

Effect of nitrogen

Bacterial isolates (RS1, RS8, RS10, and RS15) were tested for the effect of different nitrogen source on phytase production during submerged fermentation (Supplementary Fig. S1).

In this study, we examined the effect of ammonium sulphate, ammonium nitrate, peptone, sodium nitrate and urea on phytase production. Bacterial isolates RS1 and RS8 were producing maximum phytase 0.046IU/ml and 0.056IU/ml respectively. Better enzyme production was recorded at 1% of ammonium sulphate at 37 °C, pH 6.5, and 200 rpm and at 72 h. From several nitrogen sources ammonium sulphate treatment supported the highest enzyme activity (IU/ml) in RS1 and RS8.

Effect of carbon

Bacterial isolates (RS1, RS8, RS10, and RS15) were tested for the effect of different carbon sources at 1% during submerged fermentation (Supplementary Fig. S2).

The effect of glucose, sucrose, galactose and starch on phytase production for all isolates (RS1, RS8, RS10, and RS15) indicated that the maximum phytase production 0.027, 0.042, 0.023 and 0.026 IU/ml were recorded at 1% galactose respectively at 72 h, at 200 rpm, at 37 °C and pH at 6.5. The maximum phytase activity was record at 72 h, at 200 rpm, at 37 °C and pH at 6.5. However, phytase activity was reduced at 96 h. The galactose treatment improved the enzyme activity.

Effects of incubation time

Bacterial isolates (RS1, RS8, RS10, and RS15) were tested for the effect of different incubation times on phytase production (Supplementary Fig. S3). All suspected isolates were optimal at 72 h incubation time with the uppermost enzyme activity.

Effects of inoculum size

The effect of the size of inoculums (100 μl up to 1000 μl v/v) on the production of phytase by selected four isolates are shown in supplementary Fig. S4. All tested bacterial isolates were found to be optimal at 800 μl inoculum based on the highest enzyme activity (IU/ml).

Stability of phytase at different pH

The effects of different pH values 3 up to 9 on the production of phytase of four selected bacterial isolates are shown in supplementary Fig. S5. All bacterial isolates were found to be optimal at pH 6 with the highest enzyme activity.

Stability of phytase at different temperatures

Stability of phytase at different temperatures of the enzyme production by the four selected bacterial isolates was observed (Supplementary Fig. S6). All bacterial isolates were optimal at value 55oC with the highest enzyme activity.

Proximate composition of poultry feed before and after addition of experimental phytase enzyme

The results of proximate analysis of commercial poultry feed (PF) as control and poultry feed with phytase enzymes (E1, E2, E3 and E4) as treatments are shown in Table 5. The pH of the poultry feed was 6.5. In this study, phytase from the bacteria was mixed with the poultry feed with a short time to gain activity. When phytase from the bacteria were mixed with the poultry feed, its activity was lost quickly. The result of proximate compositions analysis of poultry feed with phytase enzymes (E1, E2, E3 and E4 extracted from selected bacterial isolates RS1, RS2, RS3 and RS4 respectively) showed an improvement in the bioavailability of phosphorus, calcium, potassium and sodium (Table 5).

Table 5 Analysis of poultry feed (Mean ± Standard Error of the Mean)

The addition of phytase from the bacterial isolates could improve the levels of ionic nutrients found in the commercial poultry feed. The proximity analysis of poultry feed with phytase enzymes infers high improvement in the bioavailability of phosphorus (83.85a), calcium (497b), potassium (537.73c) and sodium (326.41d) were from RS15, RS8, RS10 and RS1 respectively. The statistical analysis showed that more than one enzyme additive to poultry feed increased the mean nutrient levels significantly compared to the untreated feed (Table 5).


Phytase producing bacterial isolates were selected based on their activity of phytase production and their clear zone hydrolysis around the colony. These isolates showed a range of halo from 10 to 31 mm size on wheat bran extract agar plates. This study was in agreement with earlier studies that reported clear zone of phytate hydrolysis of > 6 mm [19].

Microbial identification was conducted using 16 S rRNA partial gene sequences as unique genetic fingerprinting of bacterial isolate [6]. Nitrogen sources are the most common to effectively induce phytase enzyme production by bacterial species [20]. The reason for phytase production become decreased, might be depletion of nutrients, death phase of the life form and accumulation of by-products (such as toxins, inhibitors and proteolysis activities in the medium) [21].

The effect of inoculum size of the selected phytase producing bacterial isolates (RS8, RS1, RS10 and RS15) were clarified; maximum phytase production was recorded in the inoculum size at 800 μl (v/v) at 72 h, at 200 rpm, at 37 °C and pH at 6.5. In this study isolates grew on wheat bran extract culture media with different inoculum sizes. Isolates (RS1, RS8, RS10 and RS15) had the maximum phytase productions 0.046, 0.048, 0.04 and 0.044 IU/ml respectively. The result is expected due to the fact that at low inoculum level, growth of the organism might be reduced resulting in insufficient biomass and prolonged time for the organism to enter the stationary phase. This in turn increases the time needed for consuming the substrate and synthesizing the desired product (enzyme). On the other hand, at high concentration (size) of inoculums, the bacteria grew rapidly and the nutrients present in the media became insufficient to support the increased number of bacteria [16]. In addition, higher inoculum sizes may result in a rapid over population of the bacteria and may cause problem of aeration, rapid pH change of the medium [16]. This may affect the phytase activity of the bacterial isolates.

The effect of different pH values from 3 up to 9 on the production of phytase of four selected bacterial isolates was shown. For all isolates (RS1, RS8, RS10 and RS15) the phytase activity increased and reached the maximum at pH 6 (0.046, 0.049, 0.049, and 0.047IU/ml) respectively at 72 h, at 200 rpm, at 37 °C and pH at 6.5. At pH 9, phytase production slowed down relative to the rest of the pH values tested.

The effect of different temperature values (30, 37, 40, 50 and 55 °C) on the phytase production was evaluated at 72 h, 200 rpm, and pH of 6.5. For RS1, RS8, RS10 and RS15 isolates the optimum temperature for phytase activity was recorded at 50 °C. During this study, the phytase activity was reduced at 55 °C.

Proximate composition analysis of phosphorus, calcium, potassium and sodium before treating the poultry feed was used as control. Poultry feed mixed with phytase enzymes from E1, E2, E3 and E4 were considered as experimental treatments. Phytase as a supplement to the poultry feed was increased when compared to the control. The proximate composition analysis after supplementation of phytase with commercial poultry feed was significant to release phytate-bound phosphorus. Interestingly, improvement of bioavailability of phosphorus, calcium, potassium and sodium was observed (Table 5). Phytase when added to poultry feeds increased the proportion of feed ingredients available to the birds and increases feed efficiency [22]. It is possible that phytase could improve feed efficiency without affecting feed intake [23].


Overall, phytase was obtained from RS1, RS8, RS10 and RS15 isolates. The experimental phytase enzyme preparations were evaluated in vitro and tested for breaking down of phytate bound. The four isolates are powerful sources of phytate-degrading enzyme and suitable for the purpose of improving poultry feeds.

The optimum phytase production of the selected bacterial isolate was studied with different parameters. In this study, the maximum phytase activity (0.042IU/ml from RS8 at 1% galactose, 0.056IU/ml from RS8 at 1% ammonium sulphate, 0.038 IU/ml from RS15 at 50oC, 0.049 IU/ml from RS8 and RS10 at pH 6, 0.04 IU/ml from RS1 and RS15 at 72 h and 0.048 IU/ml from RS8 at 800 μl obtained under cultivation conditions agitated at 200 rpm, 37oC, and pH 6.5 after 72 h of incubation time. Finally, these bacterial isolates could be potential candidates for the production of phytase and applicable in poultry feed industries.


Further study should be conducted for different factors like agitation, carbon and nitrogen source either separating or mixing together for the phytase production. Further work is needed regarding optimization methods such as factorial design since combining multiple factors could give best interactions of the factors for maximum phytase production. Lastly, improvements (such as classical, mutation and/or genetic modification) of the phytase producing bacterial isolates should be performed to scale up poultry production at industrial level.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author and first author upon reasonable request. The sequence data of four bacterial isolates generated in this study were deposited to NCBI database with accession numbers of MZ407562, MZ407563, MZ407564 and MZ407565.


16S rDNA:

16 S ribosomal DNA

16S rRNA:

16 S ribosomal RNA




Addis Ababa Sciences and Technology University


Luria broth


The national center for biotechnology information


Optical Density


One Variable at a Time


Revolutions per minute




  1. Reta D. Understanding the role of indigenous chickens during the long walk to food security in Ethiopia. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2009;21:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Melkamu B. Effect of feeding different levels of dried tomato pomace on the performance of Rhode Island Red grower chicks. Int J Livest Prod. 2013;4:35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. FAO. Poultry Meat and Eggs.Vialedelleterme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy. 2010; Pp. 5–7.

  4. Yenesew A, AgrawA, Yihenew G, Dessalegn M. Poultry production manual. Bahir Dar university capacity building for scaling up of evidence best practices in agricultural production in Ethiopia (BDUCASCAPE). 2015; working paper p 17.

  5. HaftuK. Exotic chicken status, production performance and constraints in Ethiopia: a review. J Poult Sci. 2016;10:30–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. pangastutiand HWH, S.A. and, greinerR. Isolation, characterization and 18S rDNA sequence analysis of phytase producing fungi from Indonesia. J Biodiversitas. 2017;18:10–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sasirekha B, Bedashree T, Champa K. Optimization and partial purification of extracellular phytase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa p6. European. J Experi Biolo. 2012;2:95–104.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Konietzny U, Greiner R. Molecular and catalytic properties of phytate-degrading enzymes (phytases). Intl J Food Sci Tech. 2002;37:791–812.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pandey A, Szakacs G, Soccol CR, Rodriguez-Leon JA, Soccol VT. Production, purification and properties of microbial phytases. J Bioresou Technolo. 2001;77:203–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shim JH, Oh BC. Characterization and application of calcium-dependent beta-propeller phytase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DS11. J Agri Food Chem. 2012;40:9669–76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gao QL, Xiao L. W.Selection of a culture medium for reducing costs and enhancing Biomass and Intracellular Polysaccharide production by A. blazei.Food. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009;47:210–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Powar VK, Jagannathan V. Purification and properties of phytate-specific phosphatase from Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriolo. 1982;151:1102–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stephen J, Jisha MS. Phosphate solubilization efficiency. J Agricu & Environ Sci. 2008;4:110–2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Avinash T, Narayanan A, Muthuraman MS. Isolation of phytase producing bacteria from poultry faeces and optimization of culture conditions for enhanced phytase production. Int J Pharma and Pharmaceuti Sci. 2013;5:264–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mullis KB, Faloona F. Specific sinthesis of DNA in vitro via polymerase catalysed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol. 1987;55:335–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sreedevi S, Reddy. B.Screening for efficient phytase producing bacterial strains from different soils. Int J Biosci. 2013;3:76–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Selvamohan T, Ramadas V, Rejibeula M. Optimization of phytaseproductionbyPseudomonas Sp isolated from poultry faces. Int J Mod Engin Res. 2012;2:1326–30.

    Google Scholar 

  18. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.AOACPress,Washington DC; 2016.

  19. Aziz G, Nawaz M, Anjum A, Yaqub T, Mansur-ud-din A, Nazir J, Khan S. U and Aziz K. isolation and characterizationn of phytase producing bacterial isolates from soil. J Anim Plant Sci. 2015;25:771–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi YM, Suh HJ, Kim JM. Purification and properties of extracellular phytase from Bacillus sp KHU-10. J Prot Chem. 2001;20:287–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tungala A, Narayanan A, Muthuraman S. Isolation of phytase producing bacteria from poultry faeces and optimization of culture conditions for enhanced phytase production. Inter J Pharmacy and Pharmaceut Sci. 2013;5:975–1491.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sukumar D, Jalaudeen A. Effect of supplemental phytase in diet on certain economic traits in layer chicken. In J Anim Sci. 2003;73:1357–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ponnuvel P, Narayankutty K, Jalaludden A, Anitha P. Effect of phytase supplementation in low energy-protein diet on the production performance of layer chicken. J Sci Biotechnol. 2015;3:25–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Almighty God and grateful to all Biotechnology staff members at AASTU.


This work was supported by the Addis Ababa University, under Female Scholarship Program. The funds are mainly used for the purchase of laboratory reagents and gene sequencing purposes. The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and also in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



LA: Wrote proposal, collected samples, conducted laboratory experiments, documented and analysed data, drafted the manuscript. DM: Main research advising and idea formulation. EA: Assisted in laboratory technical procedures MT: Idea formulation, research design and advising, laboratory and financial support. AT: Co- research advising. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mesfin Tafesse Gemeda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Both poultry excreta and cattle shed samples were collected from respective owners with official permission and also there is no direct involvement of animals during sampling.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1: Fig. S1

The effect of different nitrogen sources on phytase production. Fig. S2 The effect of different carbon sources on phytase production. Fig. S3 The effect of incubation time on phytase production. Fig. S4 The effect of different inoculum size on phytase production. Fig. S5 The stability of different pH on phytase production. Fig. S6 Stability of phytase enzyme at different temperatures of the enzyme production by the bacterial isolates

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mussa, L.A., Yadetie, D.M., Temesgen, E.A. et al. Isolation and in-vitro characterization of extracellular phytase producing bacterial isolates for potential application in poultry feed. BMC Microbiol 23, 296 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: