Skip to main content
Download PDF

Flagellin, a plant-defense-activating protein identified from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. Dieffenbachiae invokes defense response in tobacco

BMC Microbiology volume 23, Article number: 284 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Secretome analysis is a valuable tool to study host-pathogen protein interactions and to identify new proteins that are important for plant health. Microbial signatures elicit defense responses in plants, and by that, the plant immune system gets triggered prior to pathogen infection. Functional properties of secretory proteins from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae (Xad1) involved in priming plant immunity was evaluated.

Results

In this study, the secretome of Xad1 was analyzed under host plant extract-induced conditions, and mass spectroscopic analysis of differentially expressed protein was identified as plant-defense-activating protein viz., flagellin C (FliC). The flagellin and Flg22 peptides both elicited hypersensitive reaction (HR) in non-host tobacco, activated reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging enzymes, and increased pathogenesis-related (PR) gene expression viz., NPR1, PR1, and down-regulation of PR2 (β-1,3-glucanase). Protein docking studies revealed the Flg22 epitope of Xad1, a 22 amino acid peptide region in FliC that recognizes plant receptor FLS2 to initiate downstream defense signaling.

Conclusion

The flagellin or the Flg22 peptide from Xad1 was efficient in eliciting an HR in tobacco via salicylic acid (SA)-mediated defense signaling that subsequently triggers systemic immune response epigenetically. The insights from this study can be used for the development of bio-based products (small PAMPs) for plant immunity and health.

Peer Review reports

Background

Several biotic and abiotic factors threaten plants during their life span, and about 16% of global yield loss is attributed to plant diseases [1]. Plant pathogens are of significant concern because of the associated primary and secondary yield loss, thereby affecting the food quantity and quality, resulting in huge losses. Among the different plant pathogenic genera, Xanthomonas was of great importance ascribed to the potential damage caused in economically important crops like rice, citrus, cassava, tomato, beans, passion fruit, sugarcane, and banana [2]. Their ability to survive in seed, soil, insects, weeds, and non-host plants favored the epidemics [3]. Despite several approaches including the use of resistant varieties, windbreaks, disinfestation of farm implements, the addition of copper-based chemicals, contaminated plants eradication, etc., for pathogen management [4, 5], it has been insignificant on the grounds of environmental pollution, copper toxicity and the emergence of new virulent races [6]. Consequently, considerable attention has been paid to the development of bioactive products from various sources.

In general, Xanthomonas genus deploys several sets of strategies to interact with the host, and the successful interaction depends on the protein secretory systems that secrete proteins into the extracellular milieu or transport proteins directly into the cytosol of the host cell. Xanthomonas encode six types of protein secretion systems. Type one secretion system has the simplest structure and allows direct secretion of bacterial effectors from the cytosol to the outer environment. While Type two, and five secretion systems transport proteins across the inner membrane via., sec, or TAT pathway; Type three, four, and six secretion systems are associated with extracellular pilus structure and translocate bacterial proteins directly into the host cell. The Type two secretion system delivers apoplastic effectors and plant cell wall-degrading enzymes, whereas the Type three secretion system (T3SS), delivers effector proteins into the cytoplasm of plant cells [7]. Effector proteins act to suppress or manipulate host processes by targeting a variety of cellular process, and defense components, such as receptor kinases, signaling pathways, programmed cell death, ubiquitination, vesicle trafficking, and cell wall reinforcement. Bacteria have developed strategies to invade plants using plant-like proteins, including E3 ligases, F-box proteins, etc., to increase pathogenicity [8]. Plants have evolved to recognize these effectors, directly or indirectly, via., the products of resistance genes. Plants have receptor-like kinases (RLK) and receptor-like proteins (RLP) as immune receptors in the plasma membrane to recognize the pathogen attack via., pathogen-associated molecular signatures or patterns (PAMPs), which are conserved across microbial classes and essential for pathogen survival. The recognition of different PAMPs by specific pattern recognition receptors initiates PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI). Recognition of pathogen-associated molecular signatures is characterized by defense cascade reactions in resistant plants and induces HR. Resistance development relies on the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), transcriptional re-programming, hormone biosynthesis, and callose deposition that ultimately leads to localized cell death and has a major role in plant basal immunity [9]. Microbial secretome analyses are useful for the identification of secreted proteins involved in host plant manipulation by regulating symbiosis and quorum sensing [10]. Besides understanding plant-microbe interaction, protein secretion studies will provide new insight into handling microbes for sustained and improved plant health. Flagellin from plant pathogenic bacteria is a well-known pathogen-associated molecular signature that elicits the first line of defense in plants.

Perception of the conserved peptides within the flagellar proteins by pattern recognition receptors in plants transduces a series of signaling events through MAPK cascade and WRKY transcription factors to confer enhanced resistance. The flagellar peptides (15 to 22 amino acid length) manifested a stronger defense response compared to whole flagellar protein and different amino acid sequences in plant-associated bacteria viz., Rhizobium and Agrobacterium failed to induce defense reaction [11, 12]. Similarly, we demonstrated that recombinantly over-expressed flg22 peptide of Rhizobium sp. exerted HR on the non-host plants (unpublished data, Suraj et al., 2020). Hitherto, in our previous study, the Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. punicae hpaG effector mediated defense response in the non-host plant tobacco was investigated (unpublished data), and those results suggest that plant-defense-activating proteins from plant pathogenic bacteria can be effectively utilized for plant immunity. With this perspective, we studied the secretome of plant pathogenic bacterium, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae and identified plant-defense-activating protein (flagellin), efficient in triggering HR, thereby activating defense response genes in non-host tobacco.

Results

Discerning the protein harvest phase in Xad1 and secretory protein production from Xad1

Growth and protein secretion of Xad1 in M9 minimal broth were monitored for 36 h by recording the OD, colony-forming units (CFU), and protein concentration at regular intervals. From an initial lag phase of 6 h, the cells entered into the log phase and continued their growth steadily up to 18 h. The active decline phase began after 21 h with a sharp decrease in CFU. Cell death occurs after the transition from logarithmic to stationary phase as indicated by the drop of CFU at 18 h from 146 × 1012 cfu.mL− 1 to 90 × 1011 cfu.mL− 1 at 21 h (Fig. 1). Differential expression of Xad1 secretome was studied by growing Xad1 cells in M9 medium supplemented with Dieffenbachiae leaf extract. The secreted protein from the culture supernatant of X. axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae was concentrated by ammonium sulfate precipitation, followed by desalting and clarification. Separation of the secreted protein fraction by 1D SDS-PAGE revealed an additional band under plant extract-induced conditions compared to uninduced culture (Fig. S1A). In this study, 1D SDS-PAGE analysis of Xad1-induced protein fraction showed the differentially expressed protein around 29 kDa, and 2D SDS-PAGE revealed three isoforms at the corresponding molecular weight of 29 kDa (Fig. S1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Growth curve and protein production of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae in M9 broth. Blue line indicates OD at 600 nm, red line indicates protein concentration (μg.mL− 1), and green line indicates Log of cfu.mL− 1

Full size image

Differentially expressed protein was identified as flagellin, FliC

The differentially expressed protein in the Xad1 secretome was identified by MALDI-TOF analysis. The m/z values and the peak file obtained were analyzed in the MASCOT server (Fig. S1C). Our results from peptide mass fingerprinting analysis indicated FliC or flagellin protein as a top matching hit with a score of 1319.94 possessing nine unique peptide matches and a query coverage of 39.94. The amino acid sequence from Xad1 secretome had a high level of similarity to flagellar proteins (FliC) of E. vulneris NBRC 102,420; which is similar to X. campestris pv. citri FliC sequence. Parallel to these results, the MASCOT analysis performed using the mass-charge (m/z) value obtained from Sandor Proteomics matches with flagellar protein and flagellin-related hook proteins.

Xanthomonas flagellin communicates via FLS2 in plants

The FliC protein sequence of Xad1 showed similarity with many flagellin homolog structures, including 3k8v, 3a5x, 4nx9, etc. FliCXad1 and 1UCU shared 43.6% identity, and the primary amino acid sequence was used for 3D structure prediction using 1UCU as a template (Fig. 2A). The model was validated in the SAVES server. The Ramachandran plot revealed that more than 98% of the amino acids were present in the allowed region. The flagellin needs to be disassociated to make D0–D1 accessible to innate immune receptors [13]. In planta, flagellin is sensed by the flagellin sensitive 2 (FLS2) receptor via the interaction of 22–31 amino acids in the N-terminal region of FliC protein (Fig. S2A, B). Sequence homology of Xad1Flg22 peptide: epitope region with other important bacterial strains is depicted in supplementary Figure S3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Molecular docking analysis of Xad1Flg22(orange) with FLS2 (violet) and BAK1 (wheat) complex. (A) The Flg22Xad1 peptide regions, when docked with the FLS2-BAK1 complex, revealed Flg22Xad1 binds to a shallow groove at the inner surface of the FLS2-LRR as found in the crystal structure of the solved Flg22-FLS2-BAK1 complex (PDB: 4MN8). (B) The superimposition of the docked complex (Flg22Xad1-FLS2-BAK1 in orange-violet-wheat) with the crystal structure 4MN8 (Flg22-FLS2-BAK1 in green-pink-blue) had similar folding and positioning in the structure alignment (C) The Flg22Xad1 (yellow) interacted with the FLS2 (blue) spanning LRR 6–17. (D) The interaction of Flg22Xad1(yellow) with FLS2 (blue) was stabilized through H-bonding (yellow dash) and hydrophobic interaction

Full size image

Homology modeling of the flagellin epitope region spanning 33 amino acids (N-terminalASMSTSIQRLSSGLRINSAKDDAAGLAISERC-terminal) with 77% sequence identity to PDB: 1UCU was used as a template for docking analysis with the FLS2-BAK1 complex. Protein-protein docking for the predicted Flg22Xad1 structures was used as ligand, and the FLS2 receptor of Arabidopsis thaliana along with the BAK complex (PDB: 4MN8) as a receptor and the interaction is presented in Fig. 2A.The docking analysis revealed Flg22Xad1interaction with FLS2 receptor was similar to the crystal structure of the FLS2LRR-flg22-BAK1LRRcomplex. The superimposition of the docked complex with FLS2LRR-flg22-BAK1LRR (4MN8) showed no significant deviation in the alignment of alpha-carbon atoms and root mean square deviation of the structural alignment, which was 1.6Å (Fig. 2B). The Flg22 formed H-bonding and hydrophobic contact with the LRR6-24 of the FLS2 (Fig. 2C, D).

Flagellin elicits a defense response in the non-host plant

In the present study, infiltration of the concentrated secretome of Xad1 containing flagellin induced defense response in tobacco plants within 24 h, followed by necrosis at the infiltrated spot (Fig. 3A). Further to confirm the defense elicitation specific to flagellin protein of Xad1, the 22-N-terminal amino acid sequence determined by MALDI-TOF analysis was synthesized and evaluated for defense response. Similar to Xad1 flagellin protein, the Flg22Xad1 peptide also initiated a similar incompatible reaction (HR) in tobacco plants similar to positive control, Flg22(Ps) (Fig. 3C). Our results suggest that the flagellin (FliC) and its peptide (Flg22) were both capable of eliciting a defense response in non-host tobacco.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Hypersensitive response and hydrogen peroxide detection in tobacco leaves: upon flagellin elicitation (A, B) and upon Flg22Xad1 elicitation (C, D)

Full size image

Flagellin activates pathogenesis-related process in plant system

In the present study, the initiation of defense response by ROS burst in response to flagellin sensing in tobacco plants was detected by hydrogen peroxide accumulation at the site of infiltration (in both flagellin and Flg22; Fig. 3B, D). Hydrogen peroxide accumulation at Flg22 infiltrated site was observed as dark brownish-black precipitate compared to the water infiltrated spot, suggesting the flagellin epitope region (Flg22) initiated a stronger defense response at a lower concentration (2 μM) compared to FliC protein (Fig. 3B, D).

Formation of H2O2 upon elicitation was one of the earliest events, critical for the activation of hypersensitive cell death. Several scavenging enzymes ameliorated cell toxicity due to ROS bursts. Analyses of ROS scavenging enzymes revealed the early onset of their activity in the infiltrated leaves. The PPO activity increased from the 3rd h of post-flagellin treatment, and it reached the maximum (0.12 min− 1.g− 1 of leaf tissue) at 24 h after elicitation with different PPO isoforms suggesting that the flagellin treatment might have upregulated three PPO isoforms (Fig. 4 A). However, there was no discernible difference in either isoform number or their intensity between the buffer and plant control (Fig. 4). Peroxidase activity was found to be more in flagellin treatment and was found maximum (0.038 U.mg− 1 of leaf tissue) during the 24th h post-treatment (Fig. 5B). Flagellin elicitation resulted in the increased activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase from 3rd h of post-treatment and reached to a maximum of 0.379 μmol of cinnamic acid in − 1.g− 1 during the 24th h post-treatment (Fig. 5C). Then it gradually decreased as recorded. To verify whether Flg22Xad1 elicitation induces plant systemic resistance, the expression of non-expresser of PR genes 1 (NPR1), pathogenesis-related gene 1 (PR1), and pathogenesis- related gene 2 (PR2) were studied. The expression of NPR1 and PR1 genes were found to be up-regulated by Flg22(Xad1) and Flg22(Ps) elicitor, while PR2 was down-regulated or silenced (Fig. 6).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Native PAGE for PPO activity under non-denaturing conditions. Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) bands revealed by staining with 10 mM catechol in phosphate buffer. Lane 1 Buffer; Lane 2 FliCXad1; Lane 3 Heat killed protein; Lane 4 Control

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

FliCXad1 induced defense-related enzyme assay in tobacco. Polyphenoloxidase activity (PPA) (A); Peroxidase activity (PA) (B); Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity (PAL) (C).T1, Buffer; T2, FliCXad1; T3, Heat killed protein; T4, Untreated control

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Differential expression of PR gene in response to Flg22Xad1. Pathogenesis-related genes PR1, PR2, and NPR1 were amplified using specific primers from the tobacco leaves infiltrated after 24 h with water, BSA, Flg22(Xad1), Flg22(Ps), and control (without infiltration). The transcript levels across the samples were normalized using the housekeeping gene, Actin

Full size image

Discussion

X. axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae is a biotrophic Gram-negative gamma proteobacteria that causes blight disease in ornamental plants. It has been reported that most of the Xad1 cells in the culture were viable during the lag, and log phases, and was indicated by similar curve progression of OD and CFU from 0 to 26 h. The extracellular protein concentration showed a gradual linear rise with increasing cell density and low CFU during the period suggesting cell lysis might account for the increased protein levels as reported previously [14]. The depletion of phosphorous, glucose, oxygen, and nitrogen during the growth phase might influence protein synthesis and its composition. The problem encountered by increasing levels of cytosolic protein due to the lysis of cells into the extracellular space can be carefully avoided by harvesting the cells during the early stationary phase.

Bonas (1994) [15] has established that Xanthomonads interactions with the host are under the control of hrp genes. Many hrp genes encode proteins that are components of the hrp secretion pathway and other hrp genes in the regulation of hrp and avr genes [16]. The hrp genes of bacteria are induced only during their interaction with the host plant. The expression of hrp genes can also be induced in vitro when bacteria are grown in a defined minimal medium of low pH and by the addition of certain sugars or sugar alcohols as carbon sources [17]. M9 minimal medium mimics the conditions the pathogen encounters in the apoplast [18, 19]. Rico and Preston (2008) [20] showed that the addition of apoplast extracts to M9 minimal medium promoted a higher level of hrp gene expression than synthetic minimal media. In the present study, to induce the proteins involved in host-pathogen interaction, the Xad1 was grown in M9 minimal medium with host plant extract as it mimics the plant apoplastic fluid. In our study, approximately 1-1.5 mg.mL− 1 of protein was obtained from 200 mL of the medium. Similarly, the addition of tuber extract induced approximately 50–60 proteins, of which 35 proteins were related to known virulence factors, such as pectic enzymes, protease, and the avirulence protein compared to the un-induced condition [21]. Watt et al. (2009) [14] reported that plant molecules play an essential role in triggering the bacterium to activate its protein secretion system, and protein appearing under induced conditions did not show any similarity with plant protein. Although the trigger molecules in the plant extract remain unknown, their biological properties must be conserved, so that bacterial cells endure active to secrete pathogenic factors into the culture medium [22].

Flagellin is the main proteinaceous component of extracellular flagellum filaments and is essential for the mobility and ability of bacteria to infect host plants. Similar to our results, the 1D SDS-PAGE detected the flagellin core protein (FliC) from the proteins of outer membrane vesicles by growing X. campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) in M9 medium. Besides flagellin, a few intracellular proteins, cellulase Cel5, and proteases (PrtA, PrtB, PrtC) were detected from the Erwinia chrysanthemi wild-type strain 3937 secretome [23]. Flagellar proteins were found as a significant component in the extracellular proteome of Gram-negative bacteria [24]. Multiple isoforms of FliC with molecular mass from 20 to 29 kDa and pI values from 3.5 to 4.5 were identified. The release of flagellar proteins into the extracellular medium is commonly observed in bacterial cultures [25]. The flagellum is easily disrupted from the cell surface, particularly under shaking cultures, and is not excluded by 0.2 μm filters. Komoriya et al., (1999) [25] detected 12 spots in 2D electrophoresis of 29 kDa flagellin protein, and the different isoforms might have arisen due to glycosylation and natural degradation by extracellular proteases. Similarly, our analysis of Xad1-induced protein fraction showed the differentially expressed protein around 29 kDa, and 2D SDS-PAGE revealed three isoforms at the corresponding molecular weight of 29 kDa.

The FliC consists of four domains designated D0, D1, D2, and D3. D0 to D1 was well conserved across all bacterial flagellins, and D2 to D3 domains are highly variable. Hydrophobic residues rich, N- and C-termini form coiled-coil interfaces that enable them to associate with one another and filament polymerization. The flagellum has three regions viz., basal body, hook, and filament, and the filament is composed of about 20,000 flagellins (FliC) proteins that are incorporated below the distal pentameric FliD cap [26]. In Arabidopsis, perception of the bacterial protein, flagellin, occurs at the plasma membrane through the FLS2 and BRI1-Associated Kinase1 (BAK1) complex. FLS2 binds to Flg22, a 22-amino acid flagellin-derived peptide that is a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP). Once bound to Flg22, the complex initiates several defense responses [27]. The FLS2 has an extracellular domain with 28 LRRs from the interaction site for flagellin. Binding sites with high-affinity and specificity for Flg22 have been biochemically characterized in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), and Arabidopsis [28, 29], and a single point mutation in one of the LRR repeats affects the binding activity of Flg22 completely. The crystal structural studies of FLS2 ectodomains and BAK1 in complex with Flg22 showed the mechanisms underlying Flg22 perception by FLS2. Flg22 binds to the concave surface of the FLS2 superhelical ectodomain spanning 14 LRRs (LRR3-16) [30]. The Flg22-bound FLS2 ectodomain directly interacts with the BAK1 ectodomain, with the C-terminal region of the FLS2-bound Flg22 stabilizing the FLS2-BAK1 dimerization by acting as ‘‘molecular glue’’ between the two ectodomains. Thus, the FLS2-BAK1 heterodimerization was both ligand and receptor-mediated [31, 32]. FLS2 has been identified in tomato, tobacco, rice, Brassica, poplar, and grapes, and their wide distribution across plant species suggests FLS2-mediated flagellin perception was evolutionary [33].

Arlat et al. (1992) [34] found that the concentrated supernatant preparations of the plant pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas solanacearum induced the same pattern of response on Petunia sp. Recognition of pathogen infection in plants provokes HR-based programmed cell death (PCD) to limit the further spread of the pathogen by killing the pathogen and infected host cells [35].

The HR response of Flg22Xad1 from X. axonopodis pv. dieffenbachia was analogous to Flg22 from Pseudomonas syringae. Flg22 from X.campestris pv. campestris, X. citri ssp. citri and Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri was reported to elicit defense response in Arabidopsis [30], citrus [36], and tomato [37], respectively. Though flagellin had been identified from both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, the Flg22 peptide activity had been widely studied from the genera Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas [38]. The five amino acids viz., Arg294, Tyr296, Gly318, Ser320, Asp414 determine the flagellin recognition and single amino acid polymorphism in Flg22 peptide or epitope binding region modulates the defense response [30]. Plant pathogenic bacteria avoid host detection of their flagella by expressing non-recognized flagellins [39,40,41]. Even within a single pathogen taxon (a single species or pathovar), different strains can express different flagellins and have varied host elicitation activities. For instance, in Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris (Xcc) strains, the defense-eliciting activity of flagellins was determined by flg22 region carrying Val-43/Asp polymorphism and its interaction with Arabidopsis thaliana FLAGELLIN SENSING2 (FLS2), a transmembrane leucine-rich repeat kinase, confers flagellin responsiveness. Arabidopsis FLS2 detected flagellins carrying Asp-43 or Asn-43 but not Val-43 or Ala-43, and it responded minimally for Glu-43 [28], thereby determining the eliciting/non-eliciting nature of Xcc flagellins. Similarly, a mutation in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae flagellin failed to elicit the HR response in rice cells [33]. Flagellin glycosylation or post-translational modification determines their interaction with receptors and hypersensitive inducing response [42]. Glycosylation of flagellin was reported to determine the compatible and incompatible reactions in plants. Glycosylation may increase the hydrophobicity of flagella which might interfere with efficient recognition by host plants.Flg22 and similar peptides with conserved N-terminal domain of flagellins from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other bacteria elicit plant defense responses but do not activate HR in non-host plants while flagellins from P. avenae, P. syringae pv. glycinea and P. syringae pv. tomato-induced cell death [11]. The immune elicitation potential between flagellin monomers and their peptide varies [11, 43,44,45,46].

During the pathogen attack, a burst in reactive oxygen species (ROS), namely singlet oxygen, superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals, occurs at the site of infection. ROS plays a central role in signaling and initiating a cascade of events related to plant innate immunity [47]. Among the ROS, hydrogen peroxide is the most stable and can be fixed in acidic 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) [46,47,48]. Flg22 peptide was reported to elicit HR at a concentration of 10 to 100 μM concentration and, in some cases, even at a very minimum concentration of 0.1 μM [49, 50]. It was reported that Flg22 from Xanthomonas sp induced defense response at a minimum concentration of 0.1 to 0.2 μM concentration in tomato and citrus [36, 37]. In 2014, Mott and his co-workers suggested the impact of the elicitor’s nature (larger protein or smaller peptide), their apoplastic concentrations on its stability, apoplast motility, and receptors interaction to induce defense response [46].

The highest PPO activity might be the resultant effect of protein on the plant immune system [51]. Increased peroxidase (PO) has been observed in several resistant interactions involving plant pathogenic fungi, bacteria, and viruses [52]. The PO activities are linked to lignification and generation of hydrogen peroxides at later stages of infection, which inhibit the pathogens directly, or the generation of other free radicals with antimicrobial effects [53, 54] that restrict the development of challenging phytopathogenic bacteria [55]. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase plays a vital role in the biosynthesis of phenolic phytoalexins [56], and during the initial establishment phase of a pathogen within the host tissues, the PAL activity often increases.

The increase in PAL activity indicates the activation of the phenylpropanoid pathway, and the plant defense enzymes activate the immune system. In several host-pathogen interactions, increased levels are correlated with incompatibility [57]. The product of PAL activity is trans-cinnamic acid, which is an immediate precursor for the biosynthesis of salicylic acid, a signal molecule in systemic acquired resistance [58](Klessig and Malamy, 1994).

ROS initiates a plethora of downstream signaling events essential for establishing defense mechanisms to prevent pathogen spread. Induction of plant systemic resistance by elicitors in several crops was associated with lignification and increased activities of defense gene products that are involved in the phenylpropanoid pathway and pathogenesis-related (PR) protein synthesis [59]. PR proteins are host-coded proteins induced by different types of pathogens and biotic stresses. Synthesis and accumulation of PR proteins have been well documented to play an essential role in plant defense mechanisms [60]. In the present study, the expression of NPR1 and PR1 genes were found to be up-regulated by Flg22Xad1 elicitor, while PR2 was down-regulated or silenced (Fig. 6). Upon ROS burst, the altered redox state of the cell cause activation of NPR1 from an inactive oligomeric form to an active monomeric form in the cytoplasm, which will be translocated to the nucleus, where it activates the transcription of defense-related genes [9, 61]. Over-expression of the NPR1 gene suggests the activation of defense-related pathways in tobacco upon Flg22Xad1 treatment.

Moreover, NPR1 plays a crucial role in downstream of the salicylic acid-related defense signaling pathway [9]. This confirms the Xad1 flagellin-mediated systemic resistance in tobacco plants via salicylic acid signaling, and over-expression of the PR1 gene revealed the primed state of the cells for defense response. Two critical events occur in defense priming; (i) accumulation of signaling or transcription factors, (ii) epigenetic changes that keep the plants in a “ready state” [61]. The epigenetic modification in plant immunity focuses on histone modifications by hormonal pathway-mediated defense signaling. PR1 and PR2 genes are well-defined markers to study chromatin modifications. In Arabidopsis and tobacco, over-expression of PR1 was related to increased histone acetylation in PR1 locus [62,63,64,65]. While PR2 negatively regulates immunity by affecting callose deposition upon pathogen challenge in Arabidopsis [66]. Down-regulation or silencing of the PR2 gene upon Flg22 elicitation suggests the occurrence of active callose deposition at the site of infiltration to delineate a mechanical barrier and improved immune response. Accordingly, we confirm, that the recognition of Xad1 flagellin by FLS2 in tobacco plants activates a series of defense signaling pathways, PR genes or antimicrobial compounds, cell wall reinforcement, and PCD.

Materials and methods

Growth and protein production of Xad1 in M9 medium

The X. axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae (Xad1) received from the Department of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore was maintained in nutrient agar medium. The growth and extracellular protein secretion from Xad1 were monitored by culturing the cells in M9 Minimal broth supplemented with 0.2% glycerol as a sole carbon source. The flasks were maintained at 28 ºC under continuous shaking conditions at 200 rpm, and samples were drawn at regular intervals. The number of viable cells was determined by plating the cells in M9 media, followed by counting the colonies formed and later expressed in the Log of colony-forming units per milliliter (Log of CFU.mL− 1). The bacterial growth was recorded at an optical density of 600 nm; extracellular protein concentration was measured as described by Bardford method (1976) [67] and expressed in μg.mL− 1.

Host-induced X. axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae (Xad1) secretome

The plant extract was prepared by grinding 1 g of Dieffenbachiae leaves with 10 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 7) in sterile pestle and mortar. The extract was then filtered through Whatman No.1 filter paper followed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was further clarified by filtering through a 0.2 μm membrane filter, and the plant extract was stored at − 20 ºC [22]. X. axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae (Xad1) cells were cultured in M9 Minimal medium supplemented with 2% plant extract (Dieffenbachiae sp.) and maintained at 28 ºC under shaking conditions (200 rpm) until OD600 reached 0.6. The Xad1 cells cultured in M9 Minimal medium without plant extract served as the control. The secretome protein from the Xad1 culture was prepared by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 ºC. The supernatant was filtered using a 0.2 μm membrane filter fitted to a filtration unit with vacuum suction. To concentrate the protein fractions, ammonium sulfate was then added to the supernatant to 60% saturation over 30 min with constant stirring and incubated overnight at 4 ºC. Later the pellet obtained by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 oC was resuspended in 500 μL phosphate buffer [68].

Secretome analysis

Protein separation

The secretome protein concentration was estimated using the Bradford method [66]. The proteins were resolved on 12% SDS-PAGE using the Mini-PROTEAN Tetra cell vertical electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad) according to the method adopted by Laemmli (1970). An equal concentration (15 μg) of secretome protein from Xad1 with and without supplementation of plant extract was loaded onto the 12% SDS-PAGE gel and run at 30 mA for 3 h. Broad-range marker proteins (Precision Plus protein standard, Bio-Rad) containing 10–250 kDa molecular weight proteins served as the reference. The 2D gel electrophoresis was carried out as per the standard protocol mentioned (Supplementary Methods).

Biological activity of plant-defense-activating proteins from Xad1 secretome in tobacco

A single leaf from six-week-old tobacco plants was infiltrated with secretome (FliCXad1) protein from Xad1 using a sterile 2mL syringe. Plants infiltrated with sterile water, buffer, and heat-killed secretome similarly served as control. The plants were maintained under controlled conditions for periodical observation and symptom development. The infiltered plants were periodically monitored for 48 h. The infiltrated leaves were removed and incubated with 0.1% DAB (3,3’-diaminobenzidine) solution under shaking conditions in the dark. A gentle vacuum was applied to the leaves using a desiccator for 3–5 min to absorb the stain. After 3–4 h, leaves were transferred to a bleaching solution and boiled for 15 min at 95 °C. Later the leaves were transferred to a fresh bleaching solution and allowed to stand for 30 min. The stained leaves were directly visualized and photographed. Three experimental replicates were maintained [69].

Enzyme extraction

Three-week-old tobacco plants were infiltrated with buffer (T1), FliCXad1 (T2), heat-killed protein (T3), and plants without infiltration (T4) served as the control. Samples were collected from all the treatments at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 h after infiltration, immediately ground with liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 ºC. One gram of powdered sample was extracted with 2 mL of sodium phosphate buffer, 0.1 M (pH 6.5) at 4 ºC, and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was used as an enzyme source for ROS enzyme assays.

Peroxidase assay

Peroxidase activity was assayed spectrophotometrically, according to Hartree (1955) [70]. The reaction mixture (1.5 mL of 0.05 M pyrogallol, 0.5 mL of enzyme extract, and 0.5 mL of 1% H2O2) was incubated at room temperature (28 ± 2 ºC). The change in absorbance at 420 nm was recorded at every 30-second interval for 3 min in a multimode microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA). The boiled enzyme preparation served as the blank. The enzyme activity was expressed as a change in the absorbance of the reaction mixture (min− 1.g− 1) on a fresh weight basis [53].

Polyphenol oxidase assay

Polyphenol oxidase activity was determined by adopting the procedure of Mayer et al. (1966) [71]. The reaction mixture consists of 1.5 mL of 0.01 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and 200 μL of the enzyme extract. Catechol (200 μL; 0.01 M) was added to start the reaction, and the activity was expressed as a change in absorbance at 495 nm min− 1.g− 1 fresh weight of tissue.

Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) assay

PAL activity was determined as the rate of conversion of L-phenylalanine to trans-cinnamic acid at 290 nm. Sample containing 0.4 mL of enzyme extract was incubated with 0.5 mL of 0.1 M borate buffer (pH 8.8) and 0.5 mL of 12 mM L-phenylalanine for 30 min at 30 ºC. The amount of trans-cinnamic acid synthesized was calculated using its extinction coefficient of 9630 M− 1.cm− 1 [72]. Enzyme activity was expressed as μmol trans-cinnamic acid min− 1.mg− 1 of fresh weight.

Native PAGE for polyphenol oxidase (PPO)

The enzyme was extracted by homogenizing 1 g of leaf tissue in 0.01 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) followed by centrifugation at 20,000 g for 15 min at.

4 ºC was used as an enzyme source. After native electrophoresis, the gel was equilibrated for 30 min in 0.1% phenylene diamine containing 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The addition of 10 mM catechol, followed by gentle shaking, resulted in the appearance of dark brown discrete bands [73].

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) and MASCOT analysis

The differentially expressed protein band from 1D SDS-PAGE gel was excised using a sterile scalpel and suspended in 5% acetic acid. The samples were packed in dry ice and shipped to Sandor Proteomics, Hyderabad, for MALDI-TOF analysis. The data were used to identify the proteins using the Mascot search tool (http://www.matrixscience.com). The following parameters were used for the database searches: Taxonomy: Proteobacteria, cleavage specificity, trypsin with 1 missed cleavage allowed, peptide tolerance of 50 ppm − 200 ppm for the fragment ions; with no modifications.

In silicoanalysis.

The matching peptides were aligned using the BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) program (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) with the query sequence as Xanthomonas sp. genome. The homology model of matching peptide, FliC, and Flg22 was performed using the automated Swiss-model server (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/) using PDB: 1UCU as a template. The docking analysis was performed using PyDockWeb server (https://life.bsc.es/pid/pydockweb) using PDB: 4MN8 as a receptor and Flg22 as a ligand, respectively [73, 74]. All the models were evaluated in the SAVES server (https://servicesn.mbi.ucla.edu/SAVES/). The structures were visualized using PyMol Molecular Graphics system version 0.97.

Peptide synthesis and its biological activity

Based on the molecular docking analyses, twenty-two amino acids at the N-terminal region of the flagellin protein obtained by MALDI-ToF analysis viz., Flg22 (QRLSTGSRINSAKDDAAGLQIA) were synthesized at Peptide Institute, Inc. (Osaka, Japan). The biological activity of the synthesized peptide was analyzed by the syringe infiltration technique. The flagellin peptide from Xad1 (0.5 μM, 1 μM, and 2 μM) was infiltrated into tobacco leaves using a sterile syringe, and the plants infiltrated with sterile water, BSA, and Flg22 peptide from Pseudomonas syringae (Gift of Dr.Vardis Ntoukakis, University of Warwick, UK) served as control. The hypersensitive response and hydrogen peroxide accumulation in the infiltrated leaves were analyzed, as described [75].

Differential expression of pathogenesis-related genes

Differential expression of the pathogenesis-related gene in response to FliCXad1 protein was analyzed by semi-quantitative PCR. RNA was isolated from FliCXad1, water, and BSA-infiltrated leaf tissue using the NucleoSpin® RNA Plant kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA devoid of DNA contamination using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems™, USA). RNA levels in the samples were normalized using actin gene. Pathogenesis-related genes viz., PR1, PR2, and NPR1were amplified using specific PR1 (F: 5’-CCCAAAATTCTCAACAAG-3’, R: 5’-TTAGTATGGACTTTCGCCTCT-3’); PR2 (F: 5’-ATGGCTTTCTTGCAGCTGCCCTTG-3’, R: 5’-GAGTCCAAAGTGTTTCTCTGTGATA-3’) and NPR1 (F: 5’-CTTTGGTCGTCCTCAAGCTC-3’, R: 5’-TCCATTGCAATTGTGCTTC-3’) primers respectively. Reverse Transcriptase PCR was performed in a final volume of 20 μLreaction mixture containing 1 μL of freshly synthesized cDNA, 1 μL of forward and reverse primer (10 μM) each, and 10 μL of PCR mix (Takara, USA). The following PCR program was used: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 50 s, 54 °C (PR1, NPR1, Actin)/ 56 °C (PR2) for 60 s and 72 °C for 60 s and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min respectively.

Conclusion

The study of plant-microbe interaction is essential to develop bioactive compounds like plant-defense-activating proteins, which could replace the use of chemical fungicide and pesticides, thereby maintaining the agro-ecosystem. Owing to the loss incurred by the plant-pathogenic genera Xanthomonas, the plant-pathogen interaction was studied in few species to identify the defense elicitors. X. axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae is one of the Xanthomonads in which such studies were not reported. The present investigation focused on the identification and characterization of plant-defense-activating protein, flagellin identified from X. axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae involved in host-pathogen interaction. Flagellin stimulated defense responses in tobacco plants and triggered the plant’s immune system prior to pathogen infection. The present study results can be exploited to invoke a defense response in other non-host plants.

Data Availability

All data of this manuscript are included in the manuscript. No separate external data source is required. Any additional information required will be provided by communicating with the corresponding author via the official mail: usiva@tnau.ac.in.

References

  1. Ficke A, Cowger C, Bergstrom G, Brodal G. Understanding yield loss and Pathogen Biology to improve Disease Management: Septoria Nodorum Blotch - A Case Study in Wheat. Plant Dis. 2018;102(4):696–707. 101094/PDIS-09-17-1375-FE.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marin V, Ferrarezi J, Vieira G, Sass D. Recent advances in the biocontrol of Xanthomonas spp. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-019-2646-5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marcuzzo LL. Aspectos epidemiológicos de sobrevivência e de ambiente no gênero Xanthomonas Ágora. R Divulg Cient. 2009;16:13–9. https://doi.org/10.24302/agora.v16i1.3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peitl DC, Araujo FA, Gonçalves RM, Santiago DC, Sumida CH, Peña MIB. Biological control of tomato bacterial spot by saprobe fungi from semi-arid areas of northeastern Brazil Semina Ciências Agrárias. 2017; 38: 1251–1263 https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1251.

  5. Liu K, Garret C, Fadamiro H, Kloepper JW. Antagonism of black rot in cabbage by mixture of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Bio Control. 2016;61:605–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Graham JH, Myers ME. Evaluation of soil applied systemic acquired resistance inducers integrated with copper bactericide sprays for control of citrus canker on bearing grapefruit trees. Crop Prot. 2016;90:157–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang S, Boevink PC, Welsh L, Zhang R, Whisson SC, Birch PRJ. Delivery of cytoplasmic and apoplastic effectors from Phytophthorainfestans haustoria by distinct secretion pathways. New Phytol. 2017;216:205–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Priyadharshini R, Joshi JB, Julie AMF. Sivakumar U.Bacterial effectors mimicking ubiquitin-proteasome pathway tweak plant immunity. Microbiol Res. 2021;250:126810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mou Z, Fan W, Dong X. Inducers of plant systemic acquired resistance regulate NPR1 function through redox changes. Cell. 2003;113:935–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Afroz A, Zahur M, Zeeshan N, Komatsu S. Plant-bacterium interactions analyzed by proteomics. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Takeuchi K, Taguchi F, Inagaki Y, Toyoda K, Shiraishi T, Ichinose Y. Flagellin glycosylation island in Pseudomonas syringae pv glycinea and its role in host specificity. J Bact. 2003;185:6658–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nishad R, Ahmed T, Rahman VJ, Kareem A. Modulation of plant defense system in response to microbial interactions. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bagos PG, Nikolaou EP, Liakopoulos TD, Tsirigos KD. Combined prediction of Tat and Sec signal peptides with hidden Markov models. Bioinform. 2010;26:2811–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Watt TF, Vucur M, Baumgarth B, Watt SA, Niehaus K. Low molecular weight plant extract induces metabolic changes and the secretion of extracellular enzymes but has a negative effect on the expression of the type-III secretion system in Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris. J Biotechnol. 2009;140:59–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonas U. Hrp genes of phytopathogenic bacteria. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1994;192:79–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gijsegem F, Gough C, Zischek C, Niqueux E, Arlat M, Genin S, Barberis P, German S, Castello P, Boucher C. The hrp gene locus of Pseudomonas solanacearum which controls the production of a type III secretion system encodes eight proteins related to components of the bacterial flagellar biogenesis complex. Mol Microbiol. 1995;15:1095–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao Y, Lu Y, Heu S, Hutcheson SW. Organization and environmental regulation of the Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae 61 hrp cluster. J Bac. 1992;174:1734–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huynh TV, Dahlbeck D, Staskawicz BJ. Bacterial blight of soybean: regulation of a pathogen gene determining host cultivar specificity. Sci. 1989;245:1374–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rahme L, Mindrinos M, Panopoulos N. Plant and environmental sensory signals control the expression of hrp genes in Pseudomonas syringae pv phaseolicola. J Bact. 1992;174:3499–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rico A, Preston GM. Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 uses constitutive and apoplast-induced nutrient assimilation pathways to catabolize nutrients that are abundant in the tomato apoplast. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008;21:269–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mattinen L, Nissinen R, Riipi T, Kalkkinen N, Pirhonen M. Host-extract induced changes in the secretome of the plant pathogenic bacterium, Pectobacterium atrosepticum. Proteomics. 2007;7:3527–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mozdoori N, Parchami N, Kazemipour N, Alavi SM. Sample Preparation for Secretome Analysis in A*-Type strains of Xanthomonas citri subsp citri the Causal Agent of Asiatic Citrus Canker Disease. Prog Biol Sci. 2012;2(1):87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kazemi PN, Condemine G, Hugouvieux CPN. The secretome of the plant pathogenic bacterium Erwinia chrysanthemi. Proteomics. 2004;4:3177–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan Y, Lin Q, Wang X, Joshi S, Hew C, Leung K. Comparative proteomic analysis of extracellular proteins of Edwardsiella tarda. Infect Immun. 2002;70:6475–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Komoriya K, Shibano N, Higano T, Azuma N, Yamaguchi S, Aizawa SI. Flagellar proteins and type III exported virulence factors are the predominant proteins secreted into the culture media of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 1999;34:767–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haiko J, Westerlund-Wikstrom B. The role of the bacterial flagellum in adhesion and virulence. Biol. 2013;2:1242–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yi SY, Min SR, Kwon SY. NPR1 is instrumental in priming for the enhanced flg22-induced MPK3 and MPK6 activation. Plant Pathol J. 2015;31(2):192–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Meindl T, Boller T, Felix G. The bacterial elicitor flagellin activates its receptor in tomato cells according to the address-message concept. Plant Cell. 2000;12:1783–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bauer Z, Gómez-Gómez L, Boller T, Felix G. Sensitivity of different ecotypes and mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana toward the bacterial elicitor flagellin correlates with the presence of receptor-binding sites. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:45669–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun W, Dunning FM, Fund CP, Weingarten R, Bent AF. Within-species flagellin polymorphism in Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris and its impact on elicitation of Arabidopsis FLAGELLIN SENSING2–dependent defenses. Plant Cell. 2006;18:764–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chinchilla D, Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Kemmerling B, Nürnberger T, Jones JDG. Georg Felix, Thomas Boller. A flagellin-induced complex of the receptor FLS2 and BAK1 initiates plant defence. Nature. 2007;448(7152):497–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jelenska J, Davern SM, Standaert RF, Mirzadeh S, Greenberg JT. Flagellin peptide flg22 gains access to long-distance trafficking in Arabidopsis via its receptor FLS2. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(7):1769–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang S, Sun Z, Wang H, Liu L, Lu F, Yang J, Zhang M, Zhang S, GuoZ, BentAF SW. Rice OsFLS2-mediated perception of bacterial flagellins is evaded by Xanthomonas oryzae pvs oryzae and oryzicola Mol Plant. 2015; 8(7): 1024–1037.

  34. Arlat M, Gough CL, Zischek C, Barberis PA, Trigalet A, Boucher CA. Transcriptional organization and expression of the large hrp gene cluster of Pseudomonas solanacearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1992;5:187–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Abramovitch RB, Martin GB. Strategies used by bacterial pathogens to suppress plant defenses. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004;7(4):356–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pitino M, Armstrong CM, Duan Y. Rapid screening for citrus canker resistance employing pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity responses. Hortic res. 2015;2(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bhattarai K, Louws FJ, Williamson JD, Panthee DR. Differential response of tomato genotypes to Xanthomonas-specific pathogen-associated molecular patterns and correlation with bacterial spot (Xanthomonas perforans) resistance. Hortic res. 2016;3(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Helft L, Thompson M, Bent AF. Directed evolution of FLS2 towards novel flagellin peptide recognition. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0157155. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee SK, Stack A, Katzowitsch E, Aizawa SI, Suerbaum S, Josenhans C. Helicobacterpylori flagellins have very low intrinsic activity to stimulate human gastric epithelial cells via TLR5. Microbes Infect. 2003;5:1345–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gewirtz AT, Yu Y, Krishna US, Israel DA, Lyons SL, Peek RM Jr. Helicobacter pylori flagellin evades toll-like receptor 5-mediated innate immunity. J Infect Dis. 2004; 1891914–1920.

  41. Andersen-Nissen E, Smith KD, Strobe KL, Barrett SLR, Cookson BT, Logan SM, Aderem A. Evasion of toll-like receptor 5 by flagellated bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(26):9247–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hirai H, Takai R, Kondo M, Furukawa T, Hishiki T, Takayama S, Che F-S. Glycan moiety of flagellin in Acidovorax avenae K1 prevents the recognition by rice that causes the induction of immune responses. Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9(11). https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.29933.

  43. Oh HS, Collmer A. Basal resistance against bacteria in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves is accompanied by reduced vascular staining and suppressed by multiple Pseudomonas syringae type III secretion system effector proteins. Plant J. 2005;44(2):348–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hann DR, Rathjen JP. Early events in the pathogenicity of Pseudomonas syringae on Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant J. 2007;49(4):607–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nguyen HP, Chakravarthy S, Velásquez AC, McLane HL, Zeng L, Nakayashiki H, Park DH, Collmer A, Martin GB. Methods to study PAMP-triggered immunity using tomato and Nicotiana benthamiana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010;23(8):991–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mott GA, Middleton MA, Desveaux D, Guttman DS. Peptides and small molecules of the plant-pathogen apoplastic arena. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:677.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Qi J, Wang J, Gong Z, Zhou JM. Apoplastic ROS signaling in plant immunity. Curr Opini Plant Biol. 2017;38:92–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Luna E, Pastor V, Robert J, Flors V, Mauch-Mani B, Ton J. Callose deposition: a multifaceted plant defense response. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011;24(2):183–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Choi MS, Kim W, Lee C, Oh CS. Harpins multifunctional proteins secreted by Gram-negative plant-pathogenic bacteria. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2013;26:1115–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Smith JM, Salamango DJ, Leslie ME, Collins CA, Heese A. Sensitivity to Flg22 is modulated by ligand-induced degradation and de novo synthesis of the endogenous flagellin-receptor FLAGELLIN-SENSING2. Plant Physiol. 2014;164(1):440–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Constabel CP, Barbehenn R. Defensive Roles of Polyphenol Oxidase in Plants In: Schaller A, editors Induced Plant Resistance to Herbivory Springer Dordrecht. 2008; DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8182-8_12.

  52. Chen C, Belanger RR, Benhamou N, Paulitz TC. Defense enzymes induced in cucumber roots by treatment with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Pythium aphanidermatum. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2000;56:13–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hammerschmidt R, Nuckles E, Kuc J. Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium. Physiol Plant Pathol. 1982;20:73–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bruce RJ, West CA. Elicitation of lignin biosynthesis and isoperoxidase activity by pectic fragments in suspension cultures of castor bean. Plant Physiol. 1989;91:889–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Van Sluys M, Monteiro-Vitorello C, Camargo L, Menck C, Da Silva A, Ferro J, Oliveira M, Setubal J, Kitajima J, Simpson A. Comparative genomic analysis of plant-associated bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2002;40:169–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Daayf F, Bel-Rhlid R, Belanger RR. Methyl Ester of-Coumaric Acid: a Phytoalexin-Like compound from Long English Cucumber Leaves. J Chem Ecol. 1997;23:1517–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Bhattacharyya M, Ward E. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity in soybean hypocotyls and leaves following infection with Phytophthora megasperma f sp glycinea. Can J Botany. 1988;66:18–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Klessig DF, Malamy J. The salicylic acid signal in plants, signals and signal transduction pathways in plants. Plant Mol Biol. 1994;26:1439–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Taheri P, Tarighi S. Riboflavin induces resistance in rice against Rhizoctonia solani via jasmonate-mediated priming of phenylpropanoid pathway. J Plant Physiol. 2010;167:201–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Van Loon LC, Rep M, Pieterse C. Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annual Rev Phytopathol. 2006;44:135–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Birkenbihl RP, Liu S, Somssich IE. Transcriptional events defining plant immune responses. Curr OpinPlant Biol. 2017;38:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Bruce TJA, Matthes MC, Napier JA, Pickett JA. Stressful memories of plants: evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Sci. 2007;173:603–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.09.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Butterbrodt T, Thurow C, Gatz C. Chromatin immune precipitation analysis of the tobacco PR-1a and the truncated CaMV35S promoter reveals differences in salicylic acid-dependent TGA factor binding and histone acetylation. Plant Mol Biol. 2006;61(4–5):665–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mosher RA, Durrant WE, Wang D, Song J, Dong X. A comprehensive structure-function analysis of Arabidopsis SNI1 defines essential regions and transcriptional repressor activity. Plant Cell. 2006;18(7):1750–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Koornneef A, RinDermann K, Gatz C, Pieterse CM. Histone modifications do not play a major role in salicylate-mediated suppression of jasmonate-induced PDF1 2 gene expression. Commu Integ Biol. 2008;2:143–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Oide S, Bejai S, Staal J, Guan N, Kaliff M, Dixelius C. A novel role of PR2 in abscisic acid (ABA) mediated pathogeninduced callose deposition in Arabidopsis thaliana New Phytologist. 2013; 200 (4): 1187–1199.

  67. Bradford MA, Rapid. Sensitive method for the quantification of Microgram quantities of protein utilizing the Principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1–2):248–54. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1976.9999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Sato S, Liu F, Koc H, Tien M. Expression analysis of extracellular proteins from Phanerochaete chrysosporium grown on different liquid and solid substrates. Microbiol. 2007;153:3023–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Daudi A, O’Brien JA. Detection of hydrogen peroxide by DAB staining in Arabidopsis Leaves. Bio-protocol. 2012; 218: e263.

  70. Hartree EF. Haematin Compounds In: Paech K Tracey MV, editors Modern Methods of Plant Analysis / Moderne Methoden der Pflanzenanalyse Modern Methods of Plant Analysis / Moderne Methoden der Pflanzenanalyse. 1955 vol 4 Springer Berlin Heidelberg https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-64961-5_7.

  71. Mayer AM, Harel E, Ben-Shaul R. Assay of catechol oxidase-a critical comparison of methods. Phytochem. 1966;5:783–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Dickerson D, Pascholati S, HaGerman AE, Butler L, Nicholson R. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and hydroxycinnamate: CoA ligase in maize mesocotyls inoculated with Helminthosporium maydis or Helminthosporium carbonum. Phys Plant Pathol. 1984;25:111–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Jayaraman K, Ramanuja M, Vijayaraghavan P, Vaidyanathan C. Studies on the purification of banana polyphenoloxidase. Food Chem. 1987;24:203–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Jimenez-Garcia B, Pons C, Fernandez-Recio J. pyDock WEB: a web server for rigid-body protein-protein docking using electrostatics and desolvation scoring. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(13):1698–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Daudi A, Cheng Z, O’Brien JA, Mammarella N, Khan S, Ausubel FM, Bolwell GP. The apoplastic oxidative burst peroxidase in Arabidopsis is a major component of pattern-triggered immunity. Plant Cell. 2012b;24:275–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Dr.Vardis Ntoukakis, School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK, for offering Flg22 peptide. The authors also thank DBT-BIOCARe for the financial support through project grant No. BT/ PR18134/BIC/101/795/2016 sanctioned to PR and SU. We acknowledge the Metabolomic and Proteomic Analytical Facility (MPAF) at the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India, for sharing their equipment for various analyses carried out in the present study.

Funding

This research was supported by the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD-FAST CoE) (F.No.5–6/2013-TSVII), from the Government of India under grant number F.No.5–6/2013-TSVII sanctioned to SU. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. J. Beslin Joshi

    Present address: Centre for Water Resources Development and Management, Kozhikode, India

  2. R. Priyadharshini

    Present address: Department of Microbiology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, India

  3. Both share equal authorship and contribute equally for the manuscript

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biocatalysts Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Directorate of Natural Resource Management, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641 003, India

    Tamilarasi Mani, J. Beslin Joshi, R. Priyadharshini & Sivakumar Uthandi

  2. Department of Nano Science and Technology, Directorate of Natural Resource Management, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India

    Jeya Sundara Sharmila

Authors
  1. Tamilarasi Mani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Beslin Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Priyadharshini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeya Sundara Sharmila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sivakumar Uthandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SU conceived the ideas and designed the study; TM performed the experiments; BJ performed molecular experiments and wrote the MS; RP performed sequence and structure analysis and prepared graphs; JSS performed structure and docking analysis, SU reviewed and finalized. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sivakumar Uthandi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted at Biocatalysts Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore and all comply with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. No wild plants were used and the plant material tobacco involved in this study is allowed to be used in any ordinary experiments. All the methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mani, T., Joshi, J.B., Priyadharshini, R. et al. Flagellin, a plant-defense-activating protein identified from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. Dieffenbachiae invokes defense response in tobacco. BMC Microbiol 23, 284 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-03028-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-03028-z

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us