Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Isolation and characterization of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from rhizosphere of poplar on road verge and their antagonistic potential against various phytopathogens

BMC Microbiology volume 23, Article number: 221 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) can solubilize insoluble phosphate compounds and improve phosphate availability in soil. Road verges are important in urban landscaping, but the population structure of PSB and their ecological functions in the road verge soil is still unclear.

Results

Twenty-one mineral PSB strains and 14 organic PSB strains were isolated from the rhizosphere of poplar on urban road verge. All the mineral PSB strains showed better solubilization to Ca3(PO4)2 than FePO4 or AlPO4. Among them, 7 strains showed high phosphate-solubilizing (PS) activities to Ca3(PO4)2 (150–453 mg/L). All the organic PSB strains displayed weak solubilization to lecithin. 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic analysis showed good species diversity of the PSB strains, which belongs to 12 genera: Bacillus, Cedecea, Cellulosimicrobium, Delftia, Ensifer, Paenibacillus, Pantoea, Phyllobacterium, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium and Staphylococcus. Moreover, 8 PSB strains showed various degrees of growth inhibition against 4 plant pathogenic fungi, Fusarium oxysporum S1, F. oxysporum S2, Pythium deliense Meurs Z4, Phomopsis sp. AC1 and a plant pathogenic bacterium, Pectobacterium carotovorum TP1.

Conclusions

The results indicated that these PSB strains could perform multiple ecological functions on road verge. The development and application of bio-agents based on the strains would provide a new strategy for maintaining and improving the ecosystem stability of road verges.

Background

Phosphorus is one of the essential nutrients for the growth of plants. However, it’s also a growth-limiting nutrient in the soil due to its liability to fixation [1]. To overcome phosphate deficiency and improve available phosphate, a large scale of phosphate fertilizers have been applied in modern agriculture [2]. In a short time, enormous amounts of soluble phosphate (mainly phosphate ion) is brought into the soil by the application of phosphate fertilizers, but the utilization of the phosphate ion is very low because it’s easy to be fixed again by chelation with metal ions in soil [3]. Long periods and repeated applications of phosphate fertilizers not only raise environmental problems [4] but also compromise the soil micro-ecosystem balance, resulting in the loss of soil activities [5]. Fortunately, alternative and sustainable ways to solve soil phosphate deficiency are emerging with the discovery and research of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms (PSM).

Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms are regarded as typical plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) that can transform insoluble phosphate into soluble form and promote plant growth [5]. As an important component of PSM, PSB show good plant growth-promoting abilities and excellent application potential as biofertilizers [6]. Based on the types of phosphate substrates, they can be divided into mineral (inorganic) and organic PSB [7]. The solubilization of mineral phosphate source by mineral PSB mainly involves the secretion of organic acids, accompanied by a drop in pH value, and the solubilization (mineralization) of organic phosphate source relies on catalytic activities of phosphatase, phytase, or carbon-phosphorus lyase [8]. Isolation and screening of efficient PSB are the basis for biofertilizers, enhancing plant growth and crop yield [9]. The distribution of PSB in soil shows a significant rhizosphere preference in the population [10]. To date, amounts of PSB have been isolated from different rhizospheric soil, such as rice [11], maize [12], pea [13], papaya [14], et al.

Improving phosphate availability in soil is regarded as the primary feature of PSB for plant growth. Besides, the PSB also perform potential ecological functions in soil. The interaction of inoculated PSB and indigenous microorganisms would adjust the microbial diversity and composition in the rhizosphere in favour of plants [15, 16]. Antagonism against plant disease is one of the important ecological functions of PGPR [17]. More and more research indicates that some PSB possess potent antagonistic activities. For instance, tea rhizospheric PSB strain Serratia marcescens Pt-3 showed antagonism against seven different pathogenic fungi [18]. Inoculation with PSB strain Burkholderia sp. ‘N3’ could significantly reduce the incidence of disease caused by pathogenic bacteria [19]. Therefore, the antagonistic activity is likely to expand further the application potential of PSB in agriculture and forestry.

Road verges are a vital part of urban landscaping, which have ecological and aesthetic functions in the cities [20]. However, urban road verges’ ecosystem is always more fragile than natural forests because of its low biodiversity in plant species [21] and the special soil properties influenced by urban construction and traffic [22]. Moreover, the special conflicts of plants and their roots with city infrastructure elements also limit plant growth [23]. It is reported that the soil microorganisms play important roles in maintaining soil activity and plant adaptation to stresses [24]. Nevertheless, the contribution of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), especially PSB, to the ecological stability of the urban road verge is still unclear.

Poplar is the most common plant on road verges in China. In order to figure out the phosphate-solubilizing bacteria community and their functions in urban road verge soil, we isolated and screened mineral and organic PSB strains from the poplar rhizosphere on the road verge. The isolated PSB strains were identified, and their PS activities were evaluated. The antagonistic activities of the PSB strains against five phytopathogens were assessed. This study would facilitate understanding the population structure and functions of PSB strains in rhizospheric soil of the urban road verge.

Methods

Sample collection and isolation of PSB

The soil samples were collected from the rhizosphere of 15 years old poplar trees from a road verge in the city of Huaian, China (119.05’N, 33.57’E) in June, 2018. Three soil samples were collected from three different poplar trees. For obtaining the rhizospheric soils, surface soils were removed at a distance of 2–3 m to the trunk of the poplar trees. The soil samples were collected from a 6–15 cm layer close to the poplar roots. The sample shovel was sterilized with ethanol solution (75%) and sealed in a sterile self-sealing bag. The physical and chemical characteristics of the soil samples were analyzed by Anhui Pince Testing Technology Service Co. LTD. The contents of the total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, available phosphate, calcium, ferrum, magnesium, organic matter, and soil pH value were determined following the soil testing methods of the Agricultural Industry Standard of the People’s Republic of China. The National Botanical Research Institute’s Phosphate (NBRIP) growth agar medium and Pikovskaya’s agar media were used to isolate the mineral and organic PSB strains, respectively. Ten grams (fresh weight) of the soils were suspended in 100 mL of sterile saline solution and shaken at 150 rpm, 28 °C for 30 min in a rotary shaker. The mixed liquid was serially diluted into 10− 6-fold, and 100 µL of the diluent of 10− 2-10− 6 fold was plated on NBRIP and Pikovskaya’s agar media, respectively. After 5 days of stationary incubation at 28 °C, the colonies with a clear halo around were selected and streaked onto new LB agar media. After two days of incubation, the single colony on LB agar media was picked up with an inoculating loop and cultured in LB broth at 180 rpm, 28 °C for 16–24 h. The phosphate solubilization of the purified colonies was reconfirmed by inoculating 10 µL of the cultured media (108 CFU/mL) into NBRIP or Pikovskaya’s agar media with three replicates respectively. The preliminary assessment of PS activities was evaluated by the ratio (R) (R = clear halo diameter/colony diameter). The isolated PSB strains were stored at -80 °C for further research.

Assessment of the solubilizing activities of PSB strains

The NBRIP and Pikovskaya’s broth media were used to quantitatively evaluate the PS activities of the selected mineral and organic PSB strains, respectively. For mineral PSB, individually, Ca3(PO4)2, FePO4 and AlPO4 were used as insoluble phosphate sources in NBRIP broth media. After being cultured at 180 rpm, 28 °C for 16–24 h, the PSB strains were washed twice, diluted into 108 CFU/mL with distilled water, and acted as inocula. Five hundred µL of the inoculum was inoculated into 50 mL NBRIP or Pikovskaya’s broth medium in a 100-mL Erlenmeyer flask, and the flasks were cultured at 180 rpm, 28 °C for 72 h. Each PSB strain was inoculated in triplicate, and the medium without inoculation served as a control. After incubation, the supernatant was separated by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 10 min and then filtrated with 0.22-mm-pore-size of medical millex-GP filters (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.). The concentration of solubilized phosphate in the supernatant was detected by using the ascorbate method [25]. The pH value was measured by a basic pH meter.

16 S rRNA gene and phylogenetic analysis

The PSB strains were incubated in LB nutrient broth overnight at 180 rpm, 28 °C and 1 mL of the culture medium of each PSB strain was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 2 min, washed three times with sterile saline solution for bacterial cell collection. The collected bacterial cell was used for total genomic DNA isolation by the CTAB method [26]. The 16S rRNA genes were amplified by PCR using the total genomic DNA as template and universal bacterial primers (24 F: AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG and 1492R: TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT) as primers. The PCR products were purified by using DNA purification kit (Axygen, USA) and sequenced by General Biol (Anhui) Co. LTD. The similarity of the 16S rRNA gene sequences was compared with the genetic database available using both the NCBI Blastn program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Eztaxon 16S-based Identify System (http://147.47.212.35:8080/). The identified sequences were uploaded to the GenBank nucleotide sequence database. The phylogenetic dendrogram was constructed by the neighbor-joining method and tree topology was evaluated by performing bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA 7.0) software.

Antagonism against pathogenic microorganisms

The antagonistic activities of the PSB strains were tested by using confrontation or dual culture tests [27]. Five phytopathogens including four fungi: F. oxysporum S1, F. oxysporum S2, P. deliense Meurs Z4, Phomopsis sp. AC1 and one bacterium, P. carotovorum TP1, were selected in this study. The 4 pathogenic fungi were cultured on PDA agar plates under 28 °C. After one week of incubation, the PDA agar covered with the fungus hypha was cut into 6 mm diameter discs with a cork borer, and the discs were inoculated onto the center of a new PDA plate (Diameter 90 mm). The PSB strain inocula (100 µL) were inoculated to both sides of the pathogen discs at an equal distance. For the pathogenic bacterium P. carotovorum TP1, after incubation in LB nutrient broth overnight at 180 rpm, 28 °C, 150 µL of the culture medium with a concentration of 108 CFU/mL was inoculated onto the center of a new LB plate, and the PSB strain inocula (100 µL) were inoculated to both sides of the pathogenic bacterium. The inoculated agar plates were incubated at 28 °C for 5 days. Each PSB strain vs. each pathogen strain was carried out in triplicate, and the agar plate inoculated with the pathogen strain acted as a control. The shortest diameter (d) of the pathogen colony that grew towards the bacterial colony on each confrontation plate and the maximum diameter (D) of the colony that grew away from the bacterial colony were measured after incubation. The antagonistic activity was quantified by visible zones of fungal growth inhibition (FGI) using the Eq. 1:

Antagonistic activity (%) = (D - d) / D × 100% (Eq. 1).

After the direct confrontation, the PSB strain with good performance in inhibiting pathogen growth was cultured in LB broth medium at 180 rpm, 28 °C for 24 h. The medium was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 3 min, and then the supernatant was filtrated with 0.22-mm-pore-size of medical millex-GP filters (Millipore, Bedford, Mass). The antagonistic activity of the supernatant was detected using the same direct confrontation method. One hundred µL of the supernatant was injected onto the both sides of the pathogen. The other operations were the same as above.

Data Analysis and Processing

Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA) was used to collate and analyze the data of PS activities. Multiple comparisons and correlation analyses of the data in the present study were carried out using SPSS (version 16.0) (IBM Inc., New York, USA) with the LSD method and Pearson method, respectively.

Results

Soil sample and PSB isolates

The chemical characteristics of the soil samples are displayed in Table 1. The soil is weakly alkaline. The total nitrogen and phosphorus amounts in soil are much lower than that of total potassium. The content of available phosphate was just 0.93% of the total phosphorus. For metallic elements, the amounts of Ca is higher than that of Fe and Mg. Besides, the organic matter is only 13.9 g/Kg soil. In the preliminary screening, 21 mineral PSB strains and 14 organic PSB strains showed obvious clear halo around their colonies on agar media, respectively. The ratio R of nine mineral PSB strains was beyond 1.5, and the ratio R of none of the organic PSB was beyond 1.5 (Table 2; Fig. 1).

Table 1 Physicochemical properties of the soil samples
Full size table
Table 2 Preliminary screening results of the PSB isolates
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Preliminary assessments of PS activities with clear zone formation by the mineral PSB strains (a-c) and the organic PSB strains (d-f)

Full size image

Phosphate solubilizing activities of the PSB isolates

The PS activities of the 21 mineral PSB strains and 14 organic PSB strains were quantitatively assessed (Table 3). All the 21 mineral PSB strains showed much better solubilization to Ca3(PO4)2 than FePO4 or AlPO4. The Ca3(PO4)2 solubilizing activities of the strains presented positive correlation with their FePO4 (R = 0.649, P < 0.01) and AlPO4 (R = 0.857, P < 0.01) solubilizing activities. The concentrations of solubilized phosphate from Ca3(PO4)2 ranged from 33.14 to 453.33 mg/L, which were 6.69 to 17.08 mg/L for FePO4 and 13.02 to 34.16 mg/L for AlPO4. The concentrations of solubilized phosphate were the highest for Mp1-Ha7 (453.33 mg/L), Mp1-Ha3 (391.50 mg/L), Mp2-Ha11 (373.79 mg/L), Mp1-Ha4 (355.78 mg/L), Mp1-Ha8 (322.40 mg/L), Mp1-Ha11 (227.98 mg/L) and Mp1-Ha10 (150.36 mg/L) with Ca3(PO4)2 as the insoluble phosphate source. These results were consistent with the clear halo performances on NBRIP agar. The medium pH values decreased in varying degrees whiling the PSB strains solubilized the three insoluble phosphate sources (Fig. 2). The medium pH value was significantly negatively correlated with the concentration of solubilized phosphate when using Ca3(PO4)2 as the insoluble phosphate source (R=-0.904, P < 0.05), whiling it did not show any obvious relationship when using FePO4 or AlPO4 as the insoluble phosphate source. For organic PSB strains, the highest concentrations of solubilized phosphate were 9.07 mg/L for Op4-Ha3 and 2.237 mg/L for Op1-Ha2.

Table 3 Phosphate-solubilizing activities of the PSB strains
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Phosphate-solubilizing activities of the mineral PSB strains and pH in the media. (a) Ca3(PO4)2 as mineral phosphate source, (b) FePO4 as mineral phosphate source, and (c) AlPO4 as mineral phosphate source. Error bars = S. (D). Lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences of the PS activities of different isolates and the media pH values at P < 0.05 level, respectively

Full size image

Phylogenetic identification of the PSB strains

The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees based on the 16S rDNA sequences of the PSB strains and closest phylogenic reference strains were presented in Fig. 3. The 21 mineral PSB strains could be categorized into four groups: Firmicutes (42.9%), α-proteobacteria (38.1%), Gammaproteobacteria (9.5%), and Actinobacteria (9.5%). The 14 organic PSB strains could be categorized into three groups: Firmicutes (57.1%), Gammaproteobacteria (35.7%), and β-proteobacteria (7.1%). The α-proteobacteria and Actinobacteria on the tree were all mineral PSB strains and organic PSB strains were predominant in Gammaproteobacteria and β-proteobacteria. The Firmicutes distributed into mineral and organic PSB strains were around half to half (9/8). The identification of the PSB strains was combined with the alignments of the 16S rDNA sequences of the PSB strains and the closest phylogenic reference strains from the two databases. The accession numbers and the similarities results are listed in Table 4. The PSB strains belonged to 12 genera and 25 species. Bacillus (7 isolates) and Ensifer (5 isolates) were the most dominant genera for mineral PSB strains. E. adhaerens was the most dominant species (3 isolates). Bacillus (7 isolates) and Pseudomonas (5 isolates) were the most dominant genera for organic PSB strains. Pseudomonas sp. was the most dominant species (4 isolates).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenic trees of the PSB strains based on the 16 S rRNA sequences. Maximum likelihood was used to construct the trees with bootstrapping (1000 replicates). The name of mineral PSB strains were marked in red, and the organic PSB strains were marked in blue

Full size image
Table 4 Alignment results of 16 S rDNA sequences of the PSB strains with genetic databases
Full size table

Antagonistic effect of the PSB strains against pathogenic microorganisms

In the dual culture tests, 8 PSB strains showed obvious growth inhibition against the phytopathogens (Table 5; Fig. 4). The growth of phytopathogens F. oxysporum S1 and S2 were inhibited by B. siamensis Mp3-Ha1, B. subtilis Mp4-Ha1, B. amyloliquefaciens Mp4-Ha28, and B. siamensis Mp4-Ha30, among which, B. amyloliquefaciens Mp4-Ha28 and B. siamensis Mp4-Ha30 displayed the best antagonism to F. oxysporum S1 and S2 with FGI of 63.84 and 66.51%, respectively. Five PSB strains performed powerful antagonistic activities against P. deliense Meurs Z4, and B. siamensis Mp3-Ha1 showed the highest growth inhibition rate (FGI 78.21%). The growth of Phomopsis sp. A1 was only restrained by B. siamensis Mp4-Ha30 (FGI 65.32%). On the contrary, the growth of P. carotovorum TP1 could be inhibited by all 8 PSB strains, and the highest growth inhibition rate (FGI 55.86%) was carried out by B. amyloliquefaciens Mp4-Ha28. It is noticed that B. siamensis Mp4-Ha30 showed growth inhibition against all 5 phytopathogens (FGI > 40%). B. zanthoxyli Mp1-Ha1, P. ifriqiyense Mp1-Ha8, and C. funkei Mp2-Ha20 only performed growth inhibition against the P. carotovorum TP1.

Furthermore, the antagonistic activities of B. siamensis Mp3-Ha1, B. subtilis Mp4-Ha1, B. amyloliquefaciens Mp4-Ha28, and B. siamensis Mp4-Ha30 did not show any significant (P < 0.05) differences when used the supernatants as substitutes of the PSB strains in the dual culture tests. Nevertheless, B. zanthoxyli Mp1-Ha1, P. ifriqiyense Mp1-Ha8, C. funkei Mp2-Ha20 and B. altitudinis Mp4-Ha22 completely lost their growth inhibition activities to the phytopathogens when using the supernatants instead of the strain. Noticeably, no organic PSB strains presented antagonistic activities in the tests.

Table 5 Antagonistic activities of the PSB strains against phytopathogen
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Antagonistic activities of the PSB strains against phytopathogen. (a) Growth of F. oxysporum S1 was inhibited by B. amyloliquefaciens Mp4-Ha28. (b) Growth of F. oxysporum S2 was suppressed by B. siamensis Mp4-Ha30. (c) Growth of P. deliense Meurs Z4 was prevented by B. siamensis Mp3-Ha1. (d) Growth of Phomopsis sp. A1 was repressed by B. siamensis Mp4-Ha30. (e) Growth of P. carotovorum TP1 was restrained by B. amyloliquefaciens Mp4-Ha28.

Full size image

Discussion

It is reported that the soil from road verges have lower levels of nutrients and humus compared to natural areas [22]. In this study, the contents of the nutrient elements nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and organic matter in the road verge soil were below the average levels of natural soil in China (total nitrogen: 2.65–6.95 g/kg, total phosphorus: 0.44–0.85 g/kg, total potassium: 24.9–33.2 g/kg, organic matter: 40–50 g/kg) [28]. Less organic PSB strains were isolated than mineral PSB strains, which would be caused by the low concentration of humus in the soil [29]. Regular cleaning in the city removes most of the litter from road verges and blocks the decomposition of litter into organic phosphate and other organic matters in the soil [30]. The natural selection of a low level of organic phosphate would account for the low detection frequency of organic PSB and their low PS activities.

On the contrary, the mineral PSB strains in this study showed better performances both in isolated numbers and PS activities. The concentration of solubilized phosphate released from Ca3(PO4)2 by 7 strains was above 150 mg/L. The quantitative results of PS activities in broth media were consistent (78%) with the preliminary assessment on an agar plate, suggesting the reliability of the clear halo assessment of PS activity on NBRIP agar. It is demonstrated that the mineral PSB strains solubilize mineral phosphate by acidifying the environment with organic acids secretion [6, 31]. We also found a negative correlation between the PS activities and the media pH (R=-0.904, P < 0.05). Although the media pH also showed an obvious decrease when FePO4 or AlPO4 was use as a mineral phosphate source, the concentrations of solubilized phosphate released by the PSB strains from FePO4 or AlPO4 were much lower than that from Ca3(PO4)2. Similar results were also obtained by Illmer et al. [32, 33]. They thought the organic acids secretion and environment acidification were not the only mechanism for the PSB strain to solubilize mineral phosphate. Moreover, the nature of the organic acids significantly affects the mineral phosphate solubilization by PSB [34]. These would explain the variety of PS activities toward different mineral phosphate sources by the PSB strains.

Isolation and screening of PSB strains from different soil resources are the bases for further research and application of PSB as biofertilizers or biocontrol agents [5, 9]. Up to now, the PSB strains in road verges soils were rarely researched. In this study, the phylogenetic identification results showed that Bacillus (7 isolates), Ensifer (5 isolates) and, Bacillus (7 isolates), Pseudomonas (5 isolates) were the most dominant genera of mineral and organic PSB strains. The isolated strains belonged to the common categories of PGPR, like α-proteobacteria, β-proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Gammaproteobacteria [35, 36]. Among them, Bacillus and Pseudomonas are two of the most abundant genera of PSB strains in diverse soil resources [11, 37, 38]. In the present study, the seven most effective PSB strains were S. succinus Mp1-Ha3, Cedecea sp. Mp1-Ha4, Rhizobium sp. Mp1-Ha7, P. ifriqiyense Mp1-Ha8, E. sesbaniae Mp1-Ha10, B. cereus Mp1-Ha11 and P. brenneri Mp2-Ha11. It displayed good microbial diversity of PSB strains in the road verge soil and provided good microbial resources for further PGPR research.

As a typical PGPR, PSB strains play important roles in adjusting the rhizospheric microbial community, providing a beneficial microecological environment for the plants [16]. Pathogenic resistance abilities of PSB strain, including bacteriostasis ability and antifungal activity, have been demonstrated to be one of the beneficial traits for the associated plant [18, 19]. This study assessed the antagonistic activities of PSB strains against different types of phytopathogens. F. oxysporum is a soil-colonized fungal phytopathogen with wide host range and strong pathogenicity [39]. In this study, 4 PSB strains showed growth inhibition performances against the soil fungal phytopathogens, F. oxysporum S1 and S2. P. deliense Meurs is regarded as a fungal phytopathogen from the rhizosphere, leading to root disease [40]. In this study, 5 PSB strains could inhibit the growth of P.deliense Meurs Z4. Unlike the soil fungal phytopathogen, the poplar canker disease pathogen Phomopsis sp. A1 can just be restained by B. Siamensis Mp4-Ha30. Previous study have shown that the effective biocontrol strain B. pumilus to poplar canker disease pathogen P. macrospora is isolated in the poplar stem, especially from the infected tissues [41]. Similarly, the biocontrol agent against the sheath blight pathogen of rice is also found in the rice tissues [42]. These results implied that the rhizosphere would not be the best place to isolate the biocontrol agents against the pathogen of aboveground diseases. As the only bacterial phytopathogen, P. carotovorum is also a soil phytopathogen that causes soft rot disease on many crops [43]. In the present study, the strain P. carotovorum TP1 was restrained by all 8 PSB strains. It is demonstrated that the growth of bacterial pathogens is easy to be suppressed by many secondary metabolites secreted by PGPR [44, 45]. Therefore, The secondary metabolites secreted by the PSB strains would be the main mechanism for the antagonistic activities against the strain P. carotovorum TP1.

Currently, the antifungal microorganisms seem to catch more attention, and the mechanisms of antagonism against fungal phytopathogen are more complicated [17, 27]. Overall, the mechanisms of biocontrol agents against the phytopathogens can be included as follows: (1) competing with pathogens; (2) production of extracellular antimicrobial metabolites, like antibiotics, lytic enzymes, hydrolytic enzymes, and bacteriocins. et al.; (3) priming plants for induced systemic resistance [45, 46]. In this study, the supernatants of some of the PSB strains also presented antagonistic activities with the strain tests. The extracellular metabolites would account for the antagonistic abilities of the PSB strains. The mechanisms of antagonism of these strains against the fungal phytopathogens still need further research in future.

Conclusions

In this study, 21 mineral and 14 organic PSB strains belonged to 12 genera and 25 species were isolated from road verge soil. The 21 mineral PSB strains showed much better solubilization to Ca3(PO4)2 than FePO4 or AlPO4 and the pH values in the media decreased whiling the strains solubilized these insoluble mineral phosphate sources. The PS activities of 7 mineral PSB strains were above 150 mg/L in solubilizing Ca3(PO4)2. On the contrary, all the organic PSB strains presented weak solubilization to lecithin. In the dual culture tests, 8 strains exhibited antagonistic activities against 4 plant pathogenic fungi, F. oxysporum S1, F. oxysporum S2, P. deliense Meurs Z4, Phomopsis sp. AC1 and a plant pathogenic bacterium, P. carotovorum TP1. Among them, the strain B. siamensis Mp4-Ha30 presented growth inhibition to all the five phytopathogens (FGI > 40%) and all 8 PSB strains showed inhibition to the growth of the pathogenic bacterium, P. carotovorum TP1.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PSM:

Phosphate-solubilizing microorganism

PGPR:

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

PSB:

Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria

PS activity:

Phosphate-solubilizing activity

NBRIP:

Botanical Research Institute’s Phosphate

FGI:

Fungal growth inhibition

References

  1. Schachtman DP, Reid RJ, Ayling SM. Phosphorus uptake by plants: from soil to cell. Plant Physiol. 1998;116(2):447–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Elser JJ. Phosphorus: a limiting nutrient for humanity? Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012;23(6):833–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldstein AH. Bacterial solubilization of mineral phosphates: historical perspective and future prospects. Am J Alternative Agr. 1986;1(2):51–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen M, Chen J, Sun F. Agricultural phosphorus flow and its environmental impacts in China. Sci Total Environ. 2008;405(1):140–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khan MS, Zaidi A, Wani PA. Role of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture-A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2007;27(1):29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Adnane B, Elhaissoufi W, Said K, Benmrid B, Borden K, Rchiad Z. Benefits of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on belowground crop performance for improved crop acquisition of phosphorus. Microbiol Res. 2021;252:126842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodríguez H, Fraga R. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv. 1999;17:319–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shrivastava M, Srivastava PC, D’Souza SF. Phosphate-solubilizing microbes: diversity and phosphates solubilization mechanism. In: Meena VS, editor. Role of rhizospheric microbes in soil: volume 2: nutrient management and crop improvement. Singapore: Springer; 2018. pp. 137–65.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Alori ET, Glick BR, Babalola OO. Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:971.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Reyes I, Valery A, Valduz Z. Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms isolated from rhizospheric and bulk soils of colonizer plants at an abandoned rock phosphate mine. Plant Soil. 2006;287(1):69–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Muhammad A, Muhammad T, Arfan A, Qurban A, Anwar K, Bushra T, et al. Isolation, characterization and inter-relationship of phosphate solubilizing bacteria from the rhizosphere of sugarcane and rice. Biocatal Agr Biotech. 2017;11:312–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Silva U, Cuadros-Orellana S, Silva D, Freitas-Júnior L, Fernandes A, Leite L, et al. Genomic and phenotypic insights into the potential of rock phosphate solubilizing bacteria to promote millet growth in vivo. Front Microbiol. 2021;11:574550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bahena MHR, Salazar S, Velázquez E, Laguerre G, Peix A. Characterization of phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria associated with pea (Pisum sativum L.) isolated from two agricultural soils. Symbiosis. 2016;67:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Melo J, Carvalho L, Correia P, de Souza SB, Dias T, Santana M, et al. Conventional farming disrupts cooperation among phosphate solubilising bacteria isolated from Carica papaya’s rhizosphere. Appl Soil Ecol. 2018;124:284–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu J, Qi W, Li Q, Wang S-G, Song C. Yuan X-z. Exogenous phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria changed the rhizosphere microbial community indirectly. 3 Biotech. 2020;10(4):164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Song J, Min L, Wu J, He Q, Chen F, Wang Y. Response of the microbial community to phosphate-solubilizing bacterial inoculants on Ulmus chenmoui Cheng in Eastern China. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0247309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaikh SS, Sayyed RZ. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their formulation in biocontrol of plant diseases. In: Arora NK, editor. Plant microbes symbiosis: Applied facets. New Delhi, India: Springer; 2015. pp. 337–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Gong A, Wang G, Sun Y, Song M, Dimuna C, Gao Z, et al. Dual activity of Serratia marcescens Pt-3 in phosphate-solubilizing and production of antifungal volatiles. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22(1):26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang J, Wang P, Xiao Q, Chen J. Effect of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria on the gene expression and inhibition of bacterial fruit blotch in melon. Sci Hort. 2021;282:110018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Sullivan OS, Holt AR, Warren PH, Evans KL. Optimising UK urban road verge contributions to biodiversity and ecosystem services with cost-effective management. J Environ Manage. 2017;191:162–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sjöman H, Morgenroth J, Sjöman JD, Sæbø A, Kowarik I. Diversification of the urban forest-can we afford to exclude exotic tree species? Urban For Urban Gree. 2016;18:237–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnston FM, Johnston SW. Impacts of road disturbance on soil properties and on exotic plant occurrence in subalpine areas of the australian Alps. Arct Antarct Alp Res. 2004;36(2):201–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Randrup TB, McPherson EG, Costello LR. A review of tree root conflicts with sidewalks, curbs, and roads. Urban Ecosyst. 2001;5(3):209–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Al-surhanee AA, Soliman MH, Ouf SA. Chapter 10 - the role of soil microbes in the plant adaptation to stresses: current scenario and future perspective. In: Aftab T, Hakeem KR, editors. Frontiers in Plant-Soil Interaction. Cambridge: Academic; 2021. pp. 237–58.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Ames BN. Assay of inorganic phosphate, total phosphate and phosphatases. Method Enzymol. 1966;8:115–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vingataramin L, Frost EH. A single protocol for extraction of gDNA from bacteria and yeast. Biotechniques. 2015;58(3):120–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ali S, Hameed S, Shahid M, Iqbal M, Lazarovits G, Imran A. Functional characterization of potential PGPR exhibiting broad-spectrum antifungal activity. Microbiol Res. 2020;232:126389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tang T-t, Yu J-h, Han S-j, Wang L-h. Wang Q-g. A study on humus composition and contents of elements in soil of Changbai Mountain area nature reserve. Sci Technol Eng. 2015;15(14):1671–815.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zederer DP, Talkner U. Organic P in temperate forest mineral soils as affected by humus form and mineralogical characteristics and its relationship to the foliar P content of european beech. Geoderma. 2018;325:162–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mishra B, Khanna PK, Ulrich B. A simulation model for organic phosphorus transformation in a forest soil ecosystem. Ecol Model. 1979;6(1):31–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vyas P, Gulati A. Organic acid production in vitro and plant growth promotion in maize under controlled environment by phosphate-solubilizing fluorescent Pseudomonas. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Illmer P, Barbato A, Schinner F. Solubilization of hardly-soluble AlPO4 with P-solubilizing microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem. 1995;27(3):265–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Illmer P, Schinner F. Solubilization of inorganic phosphates by microorganisms isolated from forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1992;24(4):389–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Patel DK, Archana G, Kumar GN. Variation in the nature of organic acid secretion and mineral phosphate solubilization by Citrobacter sp. DHRSS in the presence of different sugars. Curr Microbiol. 2008;56(2):168–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S, Nasrulhaq Boyce A. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability-A review. Molecules. 2016;21(5):573.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zheng B-X, Ibrahim M, Zhang D-P, Bi Q-F, Li H-Z, Zhou G-W, et al. Identification and characterization of inorganic-phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from agricultural fields with a rapid isolation method. AMB Express. 2018;8(1):47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bakhshandeh E, Rahimian H, Pirdashti H, Nematzadeh GA. Evaluation of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria on the growth and grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropped in northern Iran. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;119:1371–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Magallon-Servín P, Antoun H, Taktek S, Bashan Y, de-Bashan L. The maize mycorrhizosphere as a source for isolation of arbuscular mycorrhizae-compatible phosphate rock-solubilizing bacteria. Plant Soil. 2020;451(1):169–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Michielse CB, Rep M. Pathogen profile update: Fusarium oxysporum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2009;10(3):311–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Purayil SK, Bhai RS. Efficacy of bioagents against Pythium deliense Meurs associated with yellowing of black pepper. Arch Microbiol. 2021;203(5):2597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ren J-H, Li H, Wang Y-F, Ye J-R, Yan A-Q, Wu X-Q. Biocontrol potential of an endophytic Bacillus pumilus JK-SX001 against poplar canker. Biol Control. 2013;67(3):421–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Akter S, Kadir J, Juraimi AS, Saud HM, Elmahdi S. Isolation and identification of antagonistic bacteria from phylloplane of rice as biocontrol agents for sheath blight. J Environ Biol. 2014;35(6):1095–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mole BM. Exploring the virulence strategy of the soft-rot plant pathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum. PhD thesis. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2019:2–5.

  44. Marian M, Shimizu M. Improving performance of microbial biocontrol agents against plant diseases. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2019;85(5):329–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ab Rahman SFS, Singh E, Pieterse CMJ, Schenk PM. Emerging microbial biocontrol strategies for plant pathogens. Plant Sci. 2018;267:102–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sundh I, Goettel MS. Regulating biocontrol agents: a historical perspective and a critical examination comparing microbial and macrobial agents. Biocontrol. 2013;58(5):575–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China. We appreciate professor Yunpeng Wang from Huaiyin Institute of Technology for generously providing the pathogen strains.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31700546). The funder (ZQ) contributed to study design, laboratory work, data analysis and manuscript writing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huaian, 223003, China

    Zeng Qingwei, Tang Lushi, Zhang Yu, Shao Yu, Wu Wanting, Han Xuejiao & Muhammad Bilal

  2. School of Accounting, Jiangsu Vocational College of Finance & Economics, Huaian, 223003, China

    Wang Jiangchuan

  3. Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China

    Ding Xiaolei

Authors
  1. Zeng Qingwei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tang Lushi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shao Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wu Wanting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wang Jiangchuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ding Xiaolei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Han Xuejiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Muhammad Bilal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. The laboratory work, data collection and analysis were performed by ZQ, TL, ZY, SY and WW. Data analysis and the first draft of the manuscript were written by, ZQ, WJ and DX. HX and MB contributed to the discussion section and modification of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeng Qingwei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qingwei, Z., Lushi, T., Yu, Z. et al. Isolation and characterization of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from rhizosphere of poplar on road verge and their antagonistic potential against various phytopathogens. BMC Microbiol 23, 221 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02953-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02953-3

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us