Skip to main content

Molecular characterization and antifungal activity of lipopeptides produced from Bacillus subtilis against plant fungal pathogen Alternaria alternata

Abstract

Over 380 host plant species have been known to develop leaf spots as a result of the fungus Alternaria alternata. It is an aspiring pathogen that affects a variety of hosts and causes rots, blights, and leaf spots on different plant sections. In this investigation, the lipopeptides from the B. subtilis strains T3, T4, T5, and T6 were evaluated for their antifungal activities. In the genomic DNA, iturin, surfactin, and fengycin genes were found recovered from B. subtilis bacterium by PCR amplification. From different B. subtilis strains, antifungal Lipopeptides were extracted, identified by HPLC, and quantified with values for T3 (24 g/ml), T4 (32 g/ml), T5 (28 g/ml), and T6 (18 g/ml). To test the antifungal activity, the isolated lipopeptides from the B. subtilis T3, T4, T5, and T6 strains were applied to Alternaria alternata at a concentration of 10 g/ml. Lipopeptides were found to suppress Alternaria alternata at rates of T3 (75.14%), T4 (75.93%), T5 (80.40%), and T6 (85.88%). The T6 strain outperformed the other three by having the highest antifungal activity against Alternaria alternata (85.88%).

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The world population is increasing day by day, feeding this growing population was farmers’ main concern in the 1990s, but the issue has since been resolved by scientists and farmers through the development of a number of new agricultural techniques [1, 19]. However, the issues facing the globe today are of a healthy kind, such as issues with nutritious food, a healthy environment, and so forth. From the 1990s to the present, several sorts of research have been conducted in an effort to find safer agricultural inputs to replace the toxic chemicals used in agriculture and horticulture in order to achieve this healthy environment [4]. Scientists have discovered a number of biocontrol organisms. Today, pests, illnesses, and bacteria are managed by using fungi, bacteria, and insects as biocontrol agents [5, 6, 8]. The microflora and microfauna associated with crops that are typically injured by the chemicals that we use in modern agriculture are also saved by these biocontrol organisms, which substitute the chemicals in the field.

There are numerous biotic agents, including weeds, viruses, bacteria, nematodes, and insects, are encountered by agricultural crops [12]. By causing biotic stress, these agents interfere with the host crop’s natural metabolism. As a result, the crop’s growth and development are constrained, and the plant may even perish. However, not all biotic organisms are detrimental to the host plants; some of them are even helpful. Certain microorganisms are advantageous to the host plant and work as a biopesticide to conflict with pests and illnesses or as a biofertilizer to stimulate growth and development [9]. These interactions between the host plant and counter-biotic agent are symbiotic or synergistic [23, 24, 26]. Although a variety of bacteria are employed as biocontrol agents, the study is currently solely focused on plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) [14]. B. subtilis is a gram-positive, aerobic, rod-shaped, endospore-forming rhizobacterium that promotes plant development. It is an incredibly diversified bacterial species that can thrive in various environmental settings [2].

The spores have the ability to endure a variety of difficult stressful situations, and they can germinate when the environment is favourable. Numerous investigations have noted the lipopeptides from the bacteria B. subtilis broad antagonistic action against a variety of plant diseases [33], making them suitable biocontrol agents [19]. The lipopeptides found in B. subtilis are divided into three groups based on their structural relationships: the surfactin group, the fengycin group, and the iturin group [27], which are all amphiphilic membrane-active peptide antibiotics with strong antimicrobial properties and can be used as biopesticides to protect plants [15, 28]. A Gram-positive, catalase-positive bacteria called B. subtilis, sometimes referred to as the hay Bacillus or grass Bacillus, is found in soil at the ruminant and human digestive tracts [3].

B. subtilis is able to produce a hard, protective endospore that gives it the ability to withstand harsh environmental conditions. The most well-studied bacterium, B. subtilis, serves as a template for analysis of chromosome replication and bacterial cell growth. Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg gave it the original name Vibrio subtilis, and Ferdinand Cohn changed it to B. subtilis in 1872 [22]. B. subtilis can inhibit a variety of crucial plant diseases for agriculture, including Fusarium sp. [7, 35], Rhizoctonia solani [19], Sclerotium rolfsii [10], Sporisorium reilianum [25] and Verticillium dahliae [22]. In addition to controlling diseases, B. subtilis application can improve plant yields and growth [25]. B. subtilis play a significant role in improving tolerance to biotic stresses [17]. The expression of particular genes and hormones, such as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (ACC), is required for the induction of disease resistance. Ethylene controls root and shoot expansion and aids in preserving plant homeostasis. Under stressful circumstances, the breakdown of the ethylene precursor (ACC) by bacteria aids in relieving plant stress and maintaining normal growth [13]. Some of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by the B. subtilis strain (GB03) also help plants to resist pathogen attacks [18, 31]. Bacillus spp, also secrete exo-polysaccharides and siderophores that inhibit the movement of toxic ions and help to maintain the ionic balance, promote the movement of water in plant tissues, and inhibit the growth of pathogenic microbes [30]. The interaction of B. subtilis with host plants in the rhizosphere through root colonization, their biocontrol potential and mechanism of biocontrol, and the utilization of B. subtilis to maintain or increase crop productivity in the field under conditions of biotic and abiotic stress. Keeping all the above information in line and the present study was conducted with the objectives of molecular confirmation and in vitro bioassay of lipopeptides extracted from B. subtilis against Alternaria alternata.

Materials and methods

Experimental material

The various bacterial strains used, DNA isolation, PCR amplification, and anti-fungal activity of the B. subtilis are discussed in the following subheadings.

Bacterial strains

The Bacterial strains used were, T3 strain was sourced from Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), T4, T5, and T6 strains were isolated from the Western Ghats of Karnataka Sakaleshpur, India as mentioned in Table 1. All B. subtilis strains were cultured in a 30 °C incubator with shaking at 180–200 rpm on Nutrient Agar (NA), Luria Bertaini (LB) broth, and Bacillus Differentiation Agar plates in order to create the ideal conditions for bacterial growth. Additionally, all B. subtilis strains were kept as glycerol stocks. New B. subtilis strains were cultivated for 24 h in LB medium before being transferred to cryovials and kept at -80 °C. A final concentration of 20% sterile glycerol was then added.

Table 1 Bacillus subtilis strains used in this study

Isolation of B. subtilis strains

A loop’s worth of soil was suspended in one or two drops of sterile water in a microfuge tube. For 10 min, the mixture was thoroughly mixed and heated at 80 degrees Celsius to kill the majority of gramme positive and gramme negative bacteria. After cooling the heat-treated soil samples were streaked on to nutrient agar plates using inoculation loop. 1–2 days of incubation at 30 °C, during which time several colonies on nutrient agar media were discovered. Colonies that were white, dry, or pasty in appearance were picked up and re-streaked on Bacillus differentiation Agar media, where they were cultured for 1–2 days at 30 °C. The entire collection of yellow colonies seen on Bacillus differentiation agar is isolated and streaked onto a master plate. To keep the culture pure and prevent contamination, subculture once every two weeks. 100 ml of LB broth contained injected Bacillus colonies, which were then incubated at 30 °C at 180–200 rpm [21]. All of the colonies were simultaneously checked for spore release. A cryogenic vial containing 1 ml of overnight-grown cultures was filled with 50% and 60% glycerol, vortexed, and kept at -80 °C.

Quantification of DNA

DNA isolation

DNA was isolated using HiMedia—HiPurA™ Genomic DNA Purification Kit as per the manufacturers protocol. For Gram Positive bacterial preparation, a 45 mg/ml stock solution of lysozyme was prepared as described under general preparation instructions. Different strains of genomic DNA were detected using PCR. At Eurofins Scientific, Inc., oligonucleotides for PCR were created. Freeze-dried samples were dissolved in deionized water and kept at -20 °C. The primer sequences were synthesized are shown in the Table 2.

Table 2 Primers synthesized for the PCR amplification

PCR amplification

PCR reaction

Bacterial genomic DNA was used to amplify the Iturin C, fen A, fen B, fen D, srf A genes. 1.25 U/μ of Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific, 5U/μl), 2 mM dNTPs each, 1 μM both primers and 3 mM of MgCl2 to the final volume 20 μl. Amplification was carried out using an Eppendorf thermocycler. The following parameters were used for amplification, 2 min of initial denaturation at 95 °C followed by 30 cycles of amplification with a 40 s denaturation at 95 °C, 45 s of annealing at 51 °C, and 1 min of extension at 72 °C. An extra final extension step of 15 min at 72 °C was added after the completion of the 30 cycles.

Gel electrophoresis

After the completion of the PCR amplification 10-15 μl of amplified products were used to check the amplification in 1% agarose gel casting with ethidium bromide staining in TAE buffer, at about 80 V until the marker dye reached near the end of the gel. Gels were photographed under a UV transilluminator. After the PCR and gel analysis IturinC, fenA, fenB, fenD, and srfA were detected with proper- sized amplicons in agarose gel electrophoresis with proper annealing temperature.

Invitro bioassay

Fungal and pure culture maintenance

By subculturing on PDA (Potato Dextrose Agar) media and incubating at 28 °C for 5 days, then storing at 4 °C, pure cultures of Alternaria alternata that are separated from sunflower and maize were maintained. Gram-positive, spore-forming B. subtilis colonies were redistributed on Bacillus differentiation agar (BDA Agar) and incubated at 30 °C for a few days. Culture plates were maintained at 4 °C with repeated subculturing in order to confirm the growth morphology.

Lipopeptide extraction and antifungal activity by poison food technique method

Using the poison food method, the antimicrobial activity of lipopeptide extracted from various strains was evaluated against fungal phytopathogens. For this investigation, potato dextrose agar (PDA) was used [16].

Preparation of starter culture and main culture

B. subtilis T3, T4, T5, and T6 strain starter cultures were made by adding a loop of pure B. subtilis cultures from a petri plate to the 100 ml of LB broth media made for the control. It was then stored overnight in an incubator cum shaker at 30 °C and 150 rpm for shaking. From the beginning culture, the major culture was created by inoculating 15 ml of each strain into 1.5 L of LB Broth (15 ml of additional glycerol/1.5ltr). The cultures were then incubated for 4 days at 30 °C and 150 rpm in an incubator cum shaker for shaking.

Centrifugation and acid precipitation

Supernatant i.e., cell - free extract was collected from the main culture after centrifugation in a centrifuge at 7500 rpm for 20 min. Acid precipitation was carried out by adding 2N concentrated HCl to the supernatant to lower the pH to 2 from 9. Then it was left overnight for complete precipitation at 4 °C.

Separation of lipopeptide layer

Chloroform and methanol were added to the acid-precipitated supernatant in a 2:1 ratio, and the mixture was agitated for 15 min in a magnetic stirrer. The mixture was placed to a layer-separating funnel and allowed to sit for 4 h. The intermediate layer, which was white and appeared semi-liquid, was then collected. For the collection of the remaining lipopeptides, the upper and lower layer was again reextracted three times in the same manner. The layer was then collected, mixed with an equivalent amount of methanol, syringe-filtered, and kept at -20 °C for further use [7].

Purification of lipopeptides through High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

Antibiotics were detected and quantified by reversed-phase HPLC as follows. The filtrate described above was injected into an HPLC column [PREP-ODS C18, 20 mm (internal diameter) 25 cm (length), 15 mm particle diameter; Shimadzu, Columbia, MD, USA]. The mobile phase components were (A) 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water and (B) 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile. The compounds were eluted at a flow rate of 1 ml/min) with a linear gradient of solvent B, increasing from 30 to 100%. The elution pattern was monitored at 215 nm, pooled fractions (5 ml) were collected and concentrated and results is analyzed.

Antifungal activity by poison food technique method

The PDA medium was made by autoclaving, and after cooling, it was combined with lipopeptides at a concentration of 10 ug/ml media with each of T3, T4, T5, and T6 separately. The mixture was then left to set. A 6 mm disc of Alternaria alternata was then placed precisely in the centre of each petri dish after 25 ml of medium had been added. As a control, a PDA plate without lipopeptide and with a fungal disc in the centre was employed. Three more PDA plates were reproduced for each treatment. All of these plates were kept in the incubator at 27 °C for 5 days before being placed in storage at 4° C. The fungal pathogens’ radial mycelial growth was observed, and the % inhibition was computed. The inhibition rate of the pathogen (IR) was calculated using the formula as follows [24].

$$\mathrm{IR }= [({\mathrm{C}}_{2}-{\mathrm{C}}_{1})/{\mathrm{C}}_{2}]\mathrm{\, x\, }100$$

Where, C2 is the control colony radius and C1 is the average radial growth of the pathogen in the presence of an antagonist.

Results and discussion

The isolation of the genomic DNA and PCR amplification of iturin, fengycin, and surfactin genes in B. subtilis showed their presence. From a B. subtilis culture, lipopeptides were isolated, identified using HPLC, and their effectiveness was tested against the plant disease Alternaria alternata.

Purification of antifungal compounds from Bacillus subtilis culture

Inoculating a loop-full of pure Bacillus subtilis culture from a Petri plate into the 100 ml of LB broth media prepared along with the control resulted in the creation of starter cultures of the T3, T4, T5, and T6 strains of the bacteria. After 4 days, the starter culture is inoculated to create the main culture, which is then centrifuged to obtain the supernatant. The supernatant is acid precipitated, combined with an equal volume of chloroform, and put to the separating funnel. The mixture is then allowed to sit for 3 to 4 h. Methanol is collected and used to dissolve the lipopeptide layer.

PCR amplification with specific primers

B. subtilis genomic DNA was extracted using a kit from Himedia Ltd. For validation, the purified genomic DNA was run on a 1% agarose gel, and the nano-drop reading for the DNA concentration was 63 ng/l (T3), 68.3 ng/l (T4), 86.7 ng/l (T5), and 94.8 ng/l (T6). The genes for Iturin C, fengycin A, fengycin B, fengycin D, and surfactin A were amplified using gene-specific primers. The band widths of the PCR products that were examined on an agarose gel were around 594 bp, 820 bp, 670 bp, 269 bp, and 201 bp, respectively. confirming the isolation of all the five genes used in the present study were shown in Fig. 1. In the research carried out by Meena et al. [23], observed that the gene size of the Iturin C was approximate of size 594 bp and Mota et al. [28] amplified the genes via fengycin A, fengycin B, and fengycin D in his studies and observed that they were of size approximately 800, 645 and 245 respectively. Khedher et al. [17] observed a band size of around 200 for surfactin A in their studies. All these results from previous studies are in line with the results of the present study undertaken.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A ituC gene (594 bp), B fenA gene (820 bp), C fenB gene (670 bp), D fenD gene (269 bp) and E srfA gene (201 bp) from B. subtilis strains 1-T3, 2-T4,3-T5,4-T6, L-Ladder 100 bp

Profiling of lipopeptides extracted from B. subtilis

The profiling of lipopeptides extracted from B. subtilis strains T3, T4, T5, and T6 was carried out using Reverse Phase High - Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) [20, 34]. The absorbance was measured at 280 nm with a C18 column and eluted at a flow rate of 1 ml/min which is specific to detect lipopeptides. The profiles revealed multiple putative lipopeptide peaks that were present and eluted at various retention durations (Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5). Each run uses 5 ml of sample to filter the lipopeptides produced by each strain via a nylon 0.22 micro meter syringe filter. From the HPLC Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5 of different strains, the peaks obtained in each run show the different biological compounds (lipopeptides) present in the strains among these T6 strain showing the highest lipopeptides presence followed by T5, T3, and T4. Thus, the analysis confirms the presence of antifungal agents and these can inhibit the anti-fungal function of the Alternaria [32].

Fig. 2
figure 2

RP-HPLC profile of lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis strain T3 which was subjected to RP-HPLC with gradient of mobile phases A- 0.1% trifluoroacetic- water solution and B- 0.1% (v/v) TFA-acetonitrile solution over 30 min with the detection wavelength of 280 nm

Fig. 3
figure 3

RP-HPLC profile of lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis strain T4 which was subjected to RP-HPLC with gradient of mobile phases A- 0.1% trifluoroacetic- water solution and B- 0.1% (v/v) TFA-acetonitrile solution over 30 min with the detection wavelength of 280 nm

Fig. 4
figure 4

RP-HPLC profile of lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis strain T5 which was subjected to RP-HPLC with gradient of mobile phases A- 0.1% trifluoroacetic- water solution and B- 0.1% (v/v) TFA-acetonitrile solution over 30 min with the detection wavelength of 280 nm

Fig. 5
figure 5

RP-HPLC profile of lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis strain T6 which was subjected to RP-HPLC with gradient of mobile phases A- 0.1% trifluoroacetic- water solution and B- 0.1% (v/v) TFA-acetonitrile solution over 30 min with the detection wavelength of 280 nm

In vitro bioassay by poison food techniques

The need for biological control of plant pathogens has significantly increased as sustainable and environmentally friendly alternatives to the massive use of fungicides [29]. The amount of extracted lipopeptide was measured, and the values for strains T3 (24 g/ml), T4 (32 g/ml), T5 (28 g/ml), and T6 (18 g/ml) were obtained. The bacterial lipopeptides have antifungal action against Alternaria alternata, and a comparable growth suppression zone was seen (Fig. 6) as reported by Caulier et al. [8]. A 4 mm radius in the control with a 0% inhibition rate was observed to inhibit the growth range in the T3, T4, T5, and T6 strains of B. subtilis. This finding was made for Alternaria alternata. The Poison Food Technique method revealed that the inhibitory activity of the T3, T4, T5, and T6 strains’ lipopeptides against Alternaria alternata was, respectively, 75.14, 75.93, 80.40, and 85.88 percent (Fig. 7), Khedher et al. [17] and Yao et al. [33] observed the same effectivity against different species and the inhibition observed on Pythium aphanidermatum by Kipngeno et al. [18]. According to Essghaier et al. [11], the B. subtilis J9 demonstrated strong growth mycelial inhibition (better than 95.3%), which inhibited the development of several phytopathogenic fungi, including Sclerotinia, Phytophthora, Penicillium, and Alternaria. The J9 strain’s biocontrol function inhibited the growth of pathogens by producing compounds that could prevent widespread illnesses and encourage plant growth.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Antifungal activity of lipopeptide extract of Bacillus subtilis strains against Alternaria alternate (C. control, R1, R2, R3 Replications of T3, T4, T5 and T6 strain)

Fig. 7
figure 7

Anti-fungal activity of Bacillus subtilis strains (T3, T4, T5 and T6) against Alternaria alternate

Conclusion

The current investigation found that the strains employed for the study had substantial antifungal activity and were effective at suppressing the plant fungal infections. When extracted lipopeptide was employed against Alternaria, the rate of inhibition was seen, and it was successfully managed. The T6 strain displayed the best antifungal activity against Alternaria among the four strains (85.88%). The in vitro results demonstrated that B. subtilis isolates, such as lipopeptide, have a great potential to be used as a biocontrol agent for the management of pathogens like Alternaria, which helps to reduce crop loss due to pathogens, as well as maintains good soil health and encourages plant growth and development. Through a variety of processes, lipopeptide-producing bacteria like Bacillus spp. can play a significant part in the control of plant diseases and boost agricultural output. These bacteria are some of the greatest possibilities for creating effective biopesticides due to their capacity to generate Bacillus spores. The dryness required for formulation into stable products is highly resistant to these spores. Thus, the goal of the current work is to decrease plant diseases by employing B. subtilis lipopeptide to regulate phytopathogens.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Agarwal H, Dowarah B, Baruah PM, Bordoloi KS, Krishnatreya DB, Agarwala N. Endophytes from Gnetum gnemon L. can protect seedlings against the infection of phytopathogenic bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum as well as promote plant growth in tomato. Microbiol Res. 2020;238:126503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ambrosini A, de Souza R, Passaglia LMP. Ecological role of bacterial inoculants and their potential impact on soil microbial diversity. Plant Soil. 2016;400:193–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baffoni L, Gaggia F, Dalanaj N, Prodi A, Nipoti P, Pisi A, Biavati B, Di Gioia D. Microbial inoculants for the biocontrol of Fusarium spp. in durum wheat. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belbahri L, Chenari Bouket A, Rekik I, Alenezi FN, Vallat A, Luptakova L, Petrovova E, Oszako T, Cherrad S, Vacher S. Comparative genomics of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains reveals a core genome with traits for habitat adaptation and a secondary metabolites rich accessory genome. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1438.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhattacharyya PN, Goswami MP, Bhattacharyya LH. Perspective of beneficial microbes in agriculture under changing climatic scenario: a review. J Phytol. 2016;8:26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumbar B, Mahmood R, Nagesha SN, Nagaraja MS, Prashant DG, Kerima OZ, Karosiya A, Chavan M. Field application of B. subtilis isolates for controlling late blight disease of potato caused by Phytophthora infestans. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2019;22:101366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao Y, Xu Z, Ling N, Yuan Y, Yang X, Chen L, Shen B, Shen Q. Isolation and identification of lipopeptides produced by B. subtilis SQR 9 for suppressing Fusarium wilt of cucumber. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2012;135:32–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Caulier S, Nannan C, Gillis A, Licciardi F, Bragard C, Mahillon J. Overview of the antimicrobial compounds produced by members of the B. subtilis group. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chung S, Kong H, Buyer JS, Lakshman DK, Lydon J, Kim SD, Roberts DP. Isolation and partial characterization of B. subtilis ME488 for suppression of soilborne pathogens of cucumber and pepper. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;80(1):115–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1520-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Curtis F, Lima G, Vitullo D, De Cicco V. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii on tomato by delivering antagonistic bacteria through a drip irrigation system. Crop Prot. 2010;29:663–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Essghaier B, Hedi A, Hajlaoui MR, Boudabous A, Sadfi-Zouaoui N. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of antifungal activities from a halotolerant Bacillus subtilis strain J9. Afr J Microbiol Res.  2012;6 (19):4073–83. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.403.

  12. Errington J, Wu LJ. Cell cycle machinery in Bacillus subtilis. In: Löwe J, Amos L, (eds). Prokaryotic Cytoskeletons. Subcellular Biochemistry. Cham: Springer; 2017;84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53047-5_3.

  13. Glick RB, Biljana T, Czarny J, Zhenyu C, Duan J, McConkey B. Promotion of Plant Growth by Bacterial ACC Deaminase. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2007;26:5–6, 227–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680701572966.

  14. Goswami D, Thakker JN, Dhandhukia PC. Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review. Cogent Food Agric. 2016;2:1127500.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hossain MJ, Ran C, Liu K, Ryu C-M, Rasmussen-Ivey CR, Williams MA, Hassan MK, Choi S-K, Jeong H, Newman M. Deciphering the conserved genetic loci implicated in plant disease control through comparative genomics of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:631.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Irshad MA, Nawaz R, urRehman MZ, Imran M, Ahmad J, Ahmad S, Inam A, Razzaq A, Rizwan M, Ali S. Synthesis and characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticles by chemical and green methods and their antifungal activities against wheat rust. Chemosphere. 2020;258:127352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khedher SB, Mejdoub-Trabelsi B, Tounsi S. Biological potential of B. subtilis V26 for the control of Fusarium wilt and tuber dry rot on potato caused by Fusarium species and the promotion of plant growth. Biol Control. 2021;152:104444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kipngeno P, Losenge T, Maina N, Kahangi E, Juma P. Efficacy of B. subtilis and Trichoderma asperellum against Pythium aphanidermatum in tomatoes. Biol Control. 2015;90:92–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar P, Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK. Bacillus strains isolated from rhizosphere showed plant growth promoting and antagonistic activity against phytopathogens. Microbiol Res. 2012;167:493–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar VK, Mahendiran R, Subramanian P, Karthikeyan S, Surendrakumar A. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society Optimization of inoculum to substrate ratio for enhanced methane yield from leather fleshings in a batch study. J Indian Chem Soc. 2022;99:100384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jics.2022.100384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kushwaha P, Kashyap PL, Srivastava AK, Tiwari RK. Plant growth promoting and antifungal activity in endophytic Bacillus strains from pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Braz J Microbiol. 2020;51:229–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Rong K, Zhao H, Li F, Lu Z, Chen R. Highly selective antibacterial activities of silver nanoparticles against B. subtilis. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2013;13:6806–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Meena KR, Sharma A, Kanwar SS. Antitumoral and antimicrobial activity of surfactin extracted from B. subtilis KLP2015. Int J Pept Res Ther. 2020;26:423–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Melkamu T, Diriba M, Gezahegn B, Girma A. Antagonistic effects of rhizobacteria against Coffee Wilt Disease caused by Gibberella xylarioides. Asian J Plant Pathol. 2013;7(3):109–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mercado-Flores Y, Cárdenas-Álvarez IO, Rojas-Olvera AV, Pérez-Camarillo JP, Leyva-Mir SG, Anducho-Reyes MA. Application of B. subtilis in the biological control of the phytopathogenic fungus Sporisorium reilianum. Biol Control. 2014;76:36–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mishra J, Prakash J, Arora NK. Role of beneficial soil microbes in sustainable agriculture and environmental management. Clim Chang Environ Sustain. 2016;4:137–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mora I, Cabrefiga J, Montesinos E. Antimicrobial peptide genes in Bacillus strains from plant environments. Int Microbiol. 2011;14(4):213–23. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.1501.01.151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mota MS, Gomes CB, Souza IT, Moura AB. Bacterial selection for biological control of plant disease: criterion determination and validation. Braz J Microbiol. 2017;48:62–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ongena M, Jacques P. Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:115–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Radhakrishnan R, Hashem A, Abd_Allah EF. Bacillus: a biological tool for crop improvement through bio-molecular changes in adverse environments. Front Physiol. 2017;8:667.

  31. Ryu J-H, Beuchat LR. Biofilm formation and sporulation by Bacillus cereus on a stainless steel surface and subsequent resistance of vegetative cells and spores to chlorine, chlorine dioxide, and a peroxyacetic acid–based sanitizer. J Food Prot. 2005;68:2614–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu S, Liu G, Zhou S, Sha Z, Sun C. Characterization of antifungal lipopeptide biosurfactants produced by marine bacterium bacillus sp. CS30. Mar Drugs. 2019;17(4):199. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17040199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yao S, Gao X, Fuchsbauer N, Hillen W, Vater J, Wang J. Cloning, sequencing, and characterization of the genetic region relevant to biosynthesis of the lipopeptides iturin A and surfactin in B. subtilis. Curr Microbiol. 2003;47:272–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu D, Fang Y, Tang C, Klosterman SJ, Tian C, Wang Y. Genomewide transcriptome profiles reveal how B. subtilis lipopeptides inhibit microsclerotia formation in Verticillium dahliae. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2019;32:622–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao Q, Ran W, Wang H, Li X, Shen Q, Shen S, Xu Y. Biocontrol o Fusarium wilt disease in muskmelon with B. subtilisY-IVI. Biocontrol. 2013;58:283–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Department of Plant Biotechnology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore-560065, ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources (NBAIR), Bangalore and ICAR-AICRP on Post Harvest Engineering and Technology, CIPHET, Ludhiana, Punjab for HPLC facility.

Funding

No funding for the research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HBN and NSN conducted the research study and laboratory trials, KKV prepared the draft copy of the manuscript of the research, RBN, SS, NMS, GHC, and PC carried out the constructive analysis and corrections in the manuscript, SKS, and TKKS, and PSN were contributed for writing the manuscript. All the authors were read and approved for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. N. Nagesha.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors have approved for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Original unprocessed gels identified during the lab studies.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harish, B.N., Nagesha, S.N., Ramesh, B.N. et al. Molecular characterization and antifungal activity of lipopeptides produced from Bacillus subtilis against plant fungal pathogen Alternaria alternata. BMC Microbiol 23, 179 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02922-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02922-w

Keywords