Skip to main content
Download PDF

The analysis of the function, diversity, and evolution of the Bacillus phage genome

BMC Microbiology volume 23, Article number: 170 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Phages play a pivotal role in the evolution of microbial populations. The interactions between phages and their hosts are complex and may vary in response to host physiology and environmental conditions. Here, we have selected the genomes of some representative Bacillus prophages and lysosomes from the NCBI database for evolutionary analysis. We explored their evolutionary relationships and analyzed the protein information encoded by hundreds of Bacillus phages.

Results

We obtained the following conclusions: First, Bacillus phages carried some known functional gene fragments and a large number of unknown functional gene fragments, which might have an important impact on Bacillus populations, such as the formation of spores and biofilms and the transmission of virulence factors. Secondly, the Bacillus phage genome showed diversity, with a clear genome boundary between Bacillus prophages and Bacillus lytic phages. Furthermore, genetic mutations, sequence losses, duplications, and host-switching have occurred during the evolution of the Bacillus phage, resulting in low genome similarity between the Bacillus phages. Finally, the lysis module played an important influence on the process of Bacillus phage cross-species infestation.

Conclusions

This study systematically described their protein function, diversity, and genome evolution, and the results of this study provide a basis for evolutionary diversity, horizontal gene transfer and co-evolution with the host in Bacillus phages.

Peer Review reports

Background

The genus Bacillus is a kind of bacillary bacteria that exists widely in nature [1], and the dormant spores produced by Bacillus can survive in harsh circumstances (e.g., high temperature, desiccation, UV and γ-radiation) or even extraterrestrial conditions [2, 3]. Many Bacillus species produce bioactive molecules, including lipopeptides [4], polyketide compounds [5], bacteriocins [6], and siderophores [7] which are beneficial for plant health. Because of the production of these bioactive molecules, many Bacillus species are known to promote root growth, suppress pathogens, kill pests, and have cytotoxic effects on liver and colon cancer cells [8,9,10]. In addition, some Bacillus species also have the potential to generate biofuels (hydrogen) [11], biopolymers (polyhydroxyalkanoate) [12], and bioactive molecules (acyl-homoserine lactonases) [13, 14]. Therefore, Bacillus is important not only in traditional territories like agriculture, medical treatment, and pharmaceutical manufacturing but also contributes to some emerging territories such as sustainable and clean energy in the future.

Bacteriophages (phages) are present in all environments in which bacteria survive, with genetic diversity, and play an important role in the evolution of bacterial host cells [15, 16]. The main mediator of phage evolution is horizontal gene transfer (HGT) between different ancestors, which accounts for the diversity and uniqueness of phages [17]. Lytic phages act as bacterial killers lysing host cells, influencing the ecology and evolution of bacterial populations by affecting the number of bacterial populations in different environments, selecting resistant types with potentially altered phenotypes, and changing the competitive hierarchy of bacterial communities [18,19,20,21,22]. The whole genome sequences of bacteria revealed an abundance of lysogenic phage sequences in the genomes of many bacterial species [23]. Interestingly, some phage genes originated in bacterial cells, and these phage-introduced genes (called auxiliary metabolic genes) in host cells can modulate host cell metabolism during infection [24,25,26]. Therefore, phages have served as vectors of horizontal gene transfer and drivers of bacterial evolution.

Although Bacillus has been widely used for various purposes, little is known about Bacillus phages. Fewer studies have been conducted on the different functional fragments carried by Bacillus phages, the linkage between the genomes of different Bacillus phages, and whether additions or deletions of gene fragments occurred during the evolution of Bacillus phages and whether additions or deletions had an effect on Bacillus phages. Therefore, in this work, we took some representative Bacillus prophages and lytic phages as the subjects, characterized the genomes of phages to explore their evolutionary relationships, and analyzed the information of proteins encoded by Bacillus phages. Our results showed the following, (1) Bacillus phages carried different functional fragments that might have different effects on the host Bacillus species. (2) A clear genomic boundary existed between Bacillus prophages and lytic phages. (3) Bacillus phages underwent the evolutionary process of gene mutations, sequence losses, duplications and host switching, resulting in low similarity between Bacillus phage genomes. (4) The lysis module plays an important role in the evolution of Bacillus phage. Our work reveals the biological functions, genomic features and evolutionary relationships of phages, laying the foundation for a better understanding of key questions in microbial ecology, evolution and potential biotechnological applications.

Results

Bioinformatic Analysis of Proteins Encoded by Bacillus phages

In this article, nucleotide sequences of 619 prophages (Table S1) predicted by 178 Bacillus genomes and 236 lytic phages were used to compare the sequences and genome size, annotate protein function, and further statistical analysis (Fig. 1). The length of Bacillus prophage sequences ranged from 4 – 142 kb, averaging about 24 kb, and the length of Bacillus lytic phage genomes ranged from 19 – 590 kb, averaging about 99 kb (Fig. 1C). The genomes size of Bacillus lytic phage was nearly four times larger than the sequences of Bacillus prophage. The results of the functional classification of proteins encoded by all Bacillus phages were as follows: For Bacillus prophages, a total of 8457 proteins were predicted and identified as 894 kinds of proteins were homologous with proteins in the COG database. As shown in Fig. 1A, lots of Bacillus prophage proteins were associated with the life cycle of phages, such as phage capsid protein, tail proteins, related structural proteins, phage genome integration-related proteins, DNA replication and repair related proteins, phage infection-related proteins, lytic and lysogenic regulation proteins, etc. In addition, abundant predicted transcriptional regulators were also included. For Bacillus lytic phages, 5889 proteins were predicted and identified as 335 kinds of proteins were homologous with protein in the COG database. Functional analysis of Bacillus lytic phage proteins revealed that most were phage structural proteins, phage infection-related, DNA synthesis, and replication-related proteins (Fig. 1B). Bacillus prophage and Bacillus lytic phages still had many genes encoding unknown functional proteins in their genomes. Notably, proteins of interest were identified in these Bacillus phage genomes, such as proteins related to spore formation, proteins associated with cell wall biosynthesis, proteins related to cell wall-associated hydrolases (invasion-associated proteins), and proteins about exopolysaccharide biosynthesis (Table S2). These proteins also might, directly or indirectly, take part in phage-host interactions. In addition, some Bacillus phages were also found to carry virulence factors, including Hemolytic enterotoxin [27], Phospholipase C [28], Metalloprotease [29], Chitinase [30], etc., which might lead to transmission of virulence factors through horizontal gene transfer (Table S2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The information of Bacillus phage sequences and genomes including functional classification of proteins encoded by Bacillus phage and the size of Bacillus phage sequences and genomes. A The proteins related to phage lifecycles were encoded by 619 predicted prophages sequences. Only proteins with more than 50 homologs of the same function were shown. B The proteins related to phage lifecycles were encoded by 236 lytic phages genomes. Only proteins with more than 50 homologs of the same function were shown. C The Box-plot of Bacillus phage sequence and genome size, including the 619 prophage sequences and the 236 lytic phage genomes

Full size image

The Similarity Analysis Bacillus Phage Genomes

Sequences of 36 predicted prophages and 20 lytic phages were used for the evolutionary analysis of Bacillus phage (Tables S3 and S4). Figures 2, 3 and 4 were heat maps consisting of the whole genome of Bacillus phage. From the figure, we observed that most phage genomes had a low similarity, while some phage genomes were clustered together with high similarity for lysogenic and lytic phages (Figs. 2 and 3). Some phages with similar genomes whose hosts belong to the same Bacillus species are frame D, frame E, frame F, frame G, frame H, and frame I in Fig. 2, as well as frame B and frame C in Fig. 3. Another part of phages with similar genomes whose hosts belong to two different species of Bacillus, B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, respectively, are frame B in Fig. 2 and frame A in Fig. 3. Both B. cereus and B. thuringiensis belong to the B. cereus bacterial group. Their genetic similarity is extremely high except for the plasmid gene, which should be considered the same species [31]. In addition, frame A in Fig. 3 was worthy of our attention. It is composed of five virulent phages, namely B. subtilis lytic phage Grass, B. cereus lytic phage BCU4, B. thuringiensis lytic phage Evoli, B. cereus lytic phage B5S and B. thuringiensis lytic phage Spock. The genome similarity decreased from B. thuringiensis lytic phage Spock to B. subtilis lytic phage Grass. This may be a Bacillus phage genome evolutionary process, from singular to diverse and from one species to more species. Figure 4, which consisted of the whole genomes of prophages and lytic phages, showed that the genomes of almost no prophages were similar to those of lytic phages. In summary, from the perspective of phage genome similarity, the genomes of Bacillus phages are diverse, and the infestation range of Bacillus phages is limited to Bacillus that are of the same species. Phages that infected different Bacillus species showed little genomic similarity, and even phages that infected the same Bacillus species showed considerable genomic differences. Furthermore, a boundary existed between Bacillus prophages and lytic phages. Significant differences were found not only in genome size but also in genome similarity. The genomes size of Bacillus lytic phage was nearly four times larger than the sequences of Bacillus prophage, with little similarity between Bacillus prophage sequences and lytic phage genomes.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Heat map of 36 Bacillus prophage complete genome sequences. Prophages with similar genomes in the same frame, and each frame was marked with an alphabet

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Heat map of 20 Bacillus lytic phage complete genome sequences. Lytic phages with similar genomes in the same frame, and each frame was marked with an alphabet

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Heat map of 36 Bacillus prophage and 20 Bacillus lytic phage complete genome sequences. Phages with similar genomes in the same frame, and each frame was marked with an alphabet

Full size image

Interestingly, B. anthracis lytic phages Carmel SA, B. anthracis lytic phages Cherry, B. anthracis lytic phages Fah, B. cereus ATCC 14579 prophage 2 and B. cereus ATCC 4342 prophage 1 appear to be somewhat related (marked with red frame) (Fig. 4). Of these five Bacillus phages, the genomic similarity of the three lytic phages was over 74.6%, and they showed about 25% genomic similarity to B. cereus ATCC 4342 prophage 1. Also, the genomic similarity between B. cereus ATCC 4342 prophage 1 and B. cereus ATCC 14579 prophage 2 was about 25%.

Comparative Analysis of Similar Bacillus Phages Genome

A group of prophages (Fig. 2, frame H) and a group of lytic phages (Fig. 3, frame A) were selected for comparative genomic analysis to explore the evolution and laws of phages. In comparison to the genomes of the Bacillus prophages, shown in Fig. 5, four prophages have 25 shared homologous proteins. Nine proteins had clear functions, including capsid portal protein, tail tube protein, tail assembly chaperone protein, base plate assembly protein, terminase large subunit, terminase small subunit, N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase, and Lin1275 protein (putative tail-component). All other proteins were putative or hypothetical proteins. And five lytic phage genomes have 69 shared homologous proteins. Twelve proteins had clear functions, including phage protein, phage major capsid protein, terminase large subunit, thymidylate synthase, phage DNA primase, DNA translocase FtsK and ribonucleotide reductase (Fig. 6). The genomes mauve alignment showed that the genes encoding these proteins were homologous. In the Bacillus prophage sequences, both homologous (lavender region) and non-homologous (green parts) fragments existed as whole large segments; this phenomenon might result from genetic recombination (Fig. 5). Compared to the prophage, homologous and non-conservative regions in the lytic phage genome were more random (Fig. 6). Notably, conservative segments were located in the middle of the genomes, and the non-conservative segments were mainly located at both ends of the sequence in the Bacillus prophage sequences (Fig. 5). The results showed that different Bacillus phages evolve in different regularity during evolution. The Bacillus prophage mainly evolved by recombining the genome, and the recombination occurred at both ends of the genome. The Bacillus lytic phages evolved through genetic mutations randomly during evolution. Interestingly, the conservative regions of all four prophage sequences had a non-homologous gene segment (marked with light red arrows), they were both the genes that encoded the phage tail protein (Fig. 5). The previous study showed that during co-evolution with host bacteria, some Bacillus phages developed the ability to infect resistant strains [32]. Mutational evolution of phage tail proteins is probably one of the strategies.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The genomes mauve alignment of 4 similar Bacillus prophage sequences. MAUVE alignments showing the conserved structure between the similar Bacillus phage genomes. Locally Collinear Blocks (LCB) are indicated by corresponding colored region. The lavender color represents the conserved regions of all genomes. The green and yellow color represents the conserved regions between two genomes. The red color represents the conserved regions between three phages genomes. Annotations are reported by the arrow below the LCBs

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

The genomes mauve alignment of 5 similar Bacillus lytic phage genomes. Whole genome MAUVE alignments showing the conserved structure between the similar Bacillus phage genomes. Locally Collinear Blocks (LCB) are indicated by corresponding colored region. The lavender color represents the conserved regions of all genomes. The dark purple, pink and blue colors represent the conserved regions between the different phage genomes. Annotations are reported by the arrow below the LCBs

Full size image

The five interesting Bacillus phages in Fig. 4 were also selected for genomic covariance analysis using Mauve, and the results are shown in Fig. 7. Compared to the high similarity between these three lytic phage genomes, these five Bacillus genomic sequences had few homologous sequences, but some traces of homology were still present. As in Fig. 7, several discontinuous mauve homologous fragments were present in the area marked by the mauve arrow. In addition to the above homologous fragments, a homologous sequence (AreaI) was found between the genome of ATCC 4342 prophage 1, Carmel SA, Cherry, and Fah. Two homologous sequences (AreaII and Area III) were also observed between the genome of ATCC 4342 prophage 1 and ATCC 14579 prophage 2. In contrast, no additional homologous sequences occurred between the genome of ATCC 14579 prophage 2, Carmel SA, Cherry, and Fah. Taken together, the five phages may have evolved from the one phage. The phage genome was likely similar to the three lytic phages, and due to some factors, the genome first becomes the ATCC 4342 prophage 1 genome and subsequently changes from the ATCC 4342 prophage 1 genome to the ATCC 14579 prophage 2 genome. So far, the ATCC 14579 prophage 2 genome has evolved completely differently from its ancestor.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The genomes mauve alignment of 5 similar Bacillus phage genomes including 3 lytic phage genomes and 2 Bacillus prophage sequences. The genomes mauve alignment of 5 similar Bacillus lytic phage genomes. Whole genome MAUVE alignments showing the conserved structure between the similar Bacillus phage genomes. Locally Collinear Blocks (LCB) are indicated by corresponding colored region. The lavender color represents the conserved regions of all genomes. Annotations are reported by the arrow below the LCBs

Full size image

The areas corresponding to the blue arrows were gene fragments encoding the holin family (XpaF1 and holin) and endolysin proteins (N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase), which we referred to as the lysis module. Both were located behind the genes encoding the phage minor structural protein in their respective genomes. The lysis modules showed low similarity between the three lytic phage genomes, although the preceding and following sequences of the lysis module were all highly homologous. As described above, we searched for genome fragments similar to the three lytic phage genomes from NCBI and the results were shown in Table S5. Then, we searched for the lysis module where the gene fragments encoding the Holin family and endolysin proteins were adjacent form from these genome fragments, and downloaded all the lysis module protein sequences. These protein sequences were used for comparative analysis, and the results are shown in Fig. 8, the protein sequences marked with the same number and name are concatenated. These sequences were divided into two clusters, which indicated that these lysis modules were classified into two types. Further analysis of the sequences of the two types of proteins revealed that their similarity was only about 15%. Here, we named them type I and type II, represented by Carmel SA and Cherry, respectively. Interestingly, all homologous prophages from other species of Bacillus had the type I lysis module (Table S5). Subsequently, homologous sequences of both types of lysis modules were searched in NCBI, and the results are shown in Tables S6 and S7. In addition to those lytic phages and Bacillus in Table S5, the type I lysis module was also found in the genomes of some B. thuringiensis, B. cereus, and other Bacillus species. In contrast, the type II lysis module was only found in the genomes of some B. anthracis. This result coincided with the result in Table S5. In summary, we conclude that the two types of lysis modules of B. anthracis phages are related to the species of the hosts they infect.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Protein sequence alignment of 22 lysis modules from Bacillus phage genome. According to the sequence similarity, the 22 lysis modules were divided into two types, Type I and Type II

Full size image

A few additional areas of difference (marked by green and blue arrows) deserved our attention. First were the gene sequences corresponding to the green arrows, which were present in the genome of only one or two of the three lytic phages. For example, the gene sequence encoding a putative transcriptional repressor (ACLAME 12) was only present in the genomes of Carmel SA and Fah, while it was missing from the genome of Cherry. In addition, the genomes of these three cell-type phages had an un-stable region at the same corresponding position. Several non-homologous genes encoding different proteins were present in the region (Fig. 7). Such as beta-galactosidase, dimeric dUTPase, Fosfomycin resistance protein FosB, LambdaBa02 membrane protein, and some unknown function proteins. Several functionally annotated gene sequences were used to search for homologous sequences in NCBI, and the results are shown in Table S8. These genes-encode proteins involved in lactose metabolism, antibiotic resistance, regulatory factors, membrane proteins, and homologous sequences of these genes were found in different Bacillus bacteria. This phenomenon is likely caused by the horizontal gene transfer at the phage level.

Discussion

In this paper, through bioinformatic analysis of the Bacillus phage genomes, we found that in addition to the essential proteins required for phage survival, Bacillus phage encoded a number of related proteins involved in host growth or metabolic activities. These included a number of transcription factors, sporulation, and cell wall synthesis-related proteins (Table S2). These proteins were probably directly or indirectly involved in phage-host interactions. As well as the large number of unknown functional proteins encoded by Bacillus phages would become an essential booster to drive the co-evolution of Bacillus phages with their hosts. In addition, we found that some Bacillus phages carry virulence factors (Table S2). These virulence factors may be transferred between different Bacillus strains by means of horizontal gene transfer by phages that act as mobile elements, allowing non-virulent bacteria to become pathogenic. Previous studies that have demonstrated that the pathogens B. anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis were commonly infected by arbitrium-carrying mobile elements, which often carried toxins essential for pathogenicity [33]. Therefore, we should pay more attention to the fact that Bacillus phages might transfer pathogenic gene fragments to make the non-toxic bacteria pathogenic.

As a kind of simple biological entity on the planet, phages own relatively small genomes. Still, they show impressive genomic diversity and complex evolutionary relationships, which is also true for Bacillus phages. In this study, some representative Bacillus phage genomes were used to construct the heat maps, and the results indicated that Bacillus phages showed remarkable diversity at the nucleotide sequence level (Figs. 2 and 3). Furthermore, a boundary existed between Bacillus prophages and lytic phages in the genome. Significant differences were found in genome similarity, size, and evolutionary mechanisms (Figs. 1C, 5, and 6). From an evolutionary perspective, phages evolved in response to survival pressures in favor of infecting or co-evolving with their hosts [17]. For example, mutations in genes encode phage tail proteins (Fig. 5) facilitate phage infection of hosts and may also enable cross-species infection [32]. Our study also identified a group of five Bacillus phages which probably evolved from one phage (Fig. 7). In the complicated evolutionary process, these phage genomes were likely to be driven by different mechanisms. For instance, genetic mutations, sequence losses, transfer, and host switching have resulted in genetic diversity and low genome similarity between phages.

In addition, two different types of lysis modules, type I and type II were found in the five phages. Further analysis revealed some connection between the types of the two phage lysis modules and the host range of the phages, and the phage possessing the lysis module of type I could infect other species of Bacillus more often than the phage possessing type II (Table S5, Fig. 8, Tables S6 and S7). The lysis modules include gene fragments encoding the holin family (XpaF1 and holin) and endolysin proteins (N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase). It was found that the lysis module plays a role in the recognition of host bacterial substrates [34, 35]. During the evolutionary process, the primal B. anthracis phage lysis module gene was mutated into the present type I lysis module, which let the phage get an ability to recognize more other species of Bacillus and then infect them. This phenomenon has extended the host range of Bacillus phages, thus promoting the evolution and diversity of Bacillus phages.

Conclusions

The research on Bacillus phages is important since Bacillus is widely used in agricultural and industrial productions. However, the phylogeny of Bacillus phages remains a knowledge gap in Bacillus studies. In summary, we analyzed the complete genomes of Bacillus prophages and lytic phages and systematically described their protein function, diversity, and genome evolution. This study contributes to understanding the Bacillus phage genomic characteristics, Bacillus phage-host interactions, and the evolutionary relationships of Bacillus phages.

Materials and methods

Collection of Bacillus phage genomes

In NCBI, strains of 178 Bacillus species have been sequenced by others, as we selected and downloaded the whole genome sequences of 178 strains from all the Bacillus species (one strain per species) for prophage prediction using PHASTER software (Table S1). Meanwhile, 236 strains of Bacillus lytic phage genomes sequences were downloaded from NCBI (Table S9). The predicted Bacillus prophage sequences and the Bacillus lytic phage genomes obtained from NCBI were used to annotate and analyze functional genes. All the genome sequence data were from NCBI before 30th December 2022 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore).

The more familiar Bacillus species that have been under study are Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus pumilus. Most of the Bacillus lytic phages with the whole genome published in the NCBI database were isolated from them. Therefore, the five Bacillus phages mentioned above were chosen as representatives of the Bacillus phages for analysis. The genome sequences of 20 Bacillus lytic phages and 36 Bacillus prophages were selected for the evolutionary analysis of the Bacillus phage, and their hosts were all the five Bacillus mentioned above. The Bacillus prophage nucleotide sequences were obtained by prediction using PHASTER. Ten Bacillus genomes (two per species, three B. pumilus) were downloaded from NCBI to predict Bacillus prophage nucleotide sequences (Table S3). From these prophage sequences, intact or fragment sizes of more than 20 kb were selected, a total of 36 Bacillus prophage sequences (Table S3). The Bacillus lytic phage genomes were obtained from NCBI (four per species) total of 20 (Table S4).

Prediction of Bacillus prophage nucleotide sequences

All Bacillus prophage nucleotide sequences were predicted using PHASTER (http://phaster.ca/). PHASTER is a tool for identifying prophage sequences, including phage sequence identification, protein identification, and evaluating the completeness of the putative prophage. Based on the completeness of the predicted phage sequences, the prophages were classified into intact prophage, questionable prophage, and incomplete prophage.

Annotations and analysis of the Bacillus phage genome

The proteins encoded by the prophage and lytic phage sequences were predicted by GeneMark web software (http://opal.biology.gatech.edu/GeneMark) [36]. The functional annotation and the COG (Cluster of Orthologous Groups of proteins) classification of the proteins was performed using WebMGA (http://weizhong-lab.ucsd.edu/webMGA/). WebMGA is a customizable web server for fast metagenomic analysis. The bar chart was drawn by graphpad prism 9.5.1, and the Box plot was drawn by the OmicShare tools, an online platform for data analysis (https://www.omicshare.com/tools).

The evolutionary analysis of the Bacillus phage

The heat maps were made with all the phage sequences in VIRIDIC web (http://rhea.icbm.uni-oldenburg.de/VIRIDIC/). VIRIDIC was developed in R 3.5 programming language and was a new tool for calculating virus intergenomic similarities. It uses the traditional algorithm, which is also used by the Bacterial and Archaeal Viruses Subcommittee and the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) [37]. Evolutionary analysis of phage genomes was performed using the Rast (https://rast.nmpdr.org), Mauve 2.3.1and Easyfig 2.2.5. Firstly, the fasta format nucleic acid sequence files were annotated into GBK format files by Rast. Then the files in GBK format were then imported into Easyfig for protein visualization and Mauve for homology analysis. Next, the protein visualization result figure of Easyfig (protein arrows) and the analysis result figure of Mauve were integrated in one figure. Finally, the analysis was performed based on the homology results of Mauve. Rast is an automated annotation website for complete, or near-complete, archaeal and bacterial genomes [38].Mauve is a system for efficiently constructing multiple genome alignments in the presence of large-scale evolutionary events such as rearrangement and inversion [39]. Easyfig is an application for creating linear comparison figures of multiple genomic loci. BLAST comparisons between multiple genomic regions can be generated, ranging from single genes to whole prokaryote chromosomes. Protein sequence alignment of the lysis module was performed by MAFFT (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) and MView (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/mview/). First, the protein sequences of the lysis module were downloaded from NCBI. Then compared them in MAFFT and used MView to make the figure. MAFFT is an online service for multiple sequence alignmen. MView is a tool for converting the results of a sequence database search into colored multiple alignments of hits stacked against the query.

Availability of data and materials

All the genome sequences were downloaded from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore). Among them, the genomes of Bacillus prophages were predicted by software, so we provided the information of their hosts. And the genome of Bacillus lytic phage was obtained from NCBI download. All details (including accession numbers) are available in the supplementary information files.

References

  1. Turnbull PCB, Kramer JM, Melling J. Bacillus. Manual Clin Microbiol. 1991;5:296–303.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bressuire-Isoard C, Broussolle V, Carlin F. Sporulation environment influences spore properties in Bacillus: evidence and insights on underlying molecular and physiological mechanisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2018;42(5):614–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuy021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kovacs AT. Bacillus subtilis. Trends Microbiol. 2019;27(8):724–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2019.03.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Penha RO, Vandenberghe LPS, Faulds C, Soccol VT, Soccol CR. Bacillus lipopeptides as powerful pest control agents for a more sustainable and healthy agriculture: recent studies and innovations. Planta. 2020;251(3); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03357-7.

  5. Rabbee MF, Baek KH. Antimicrobial Activities of Lipopeptides and Polyketides of Bacillus velezensis for Agricultural Applications. Molecules. 2020;25(21); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214973.

  6. Nazari M, Smith DL. A PGPR-Produced Bacteriocin for Sustainable Agriculture: a Review of Thuricin 17 Characteristics and Applications. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11;  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00916.

  7. Nithyapriya S, Lalitha S, Sayyed RZ, Reddy MS, Dailin DJ, El Enshasy HA, et al. Production, Purification, and Characterization of Bacillibactin Siderophore of Bacillus subtilis and Its Application for Improvement in Plant Growth and Oil Content in Sesame. Sustainability. 2021;13(10); https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105394.

  8. Ohba M, Mizuki E, Uemori A. Parasporin, a New Anticancer Protein Group from Bacillus thuringiensis. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(1):427–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Melo ALD, Soccol VT, Soccol CR. Bacillus thuringiensis: mechanism of action, resistance, and new applications: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36(2):317–26. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2014.960793.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shafi J, Tian H, Ji MS. Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2017;31(3):446–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2017.1286950.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Magrini FE, Castilhos A, Lora LB, Paesi S. Strategies of co-cultures and bioaugmentation by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Clostridium bifermentans, Enterobacter muelleri, and E. tabaci for increasing the production of hydrogen from raw glycerol. Biomass Bioenergy. 2023;168; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106672.

  12. Israni N, Venkatachalam P, Gajaraj B, Varalakshmi KN, Shivakumar S. Whey valorization for sustainable polyhydroxyalkanoate production by Bacillus megaterium: Production, characterization and in vitro biocompatibility evaluation. J Environ Manag. 2020;255; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109884.

  13. Noor AO, Almasri DM, Basyony AF, Albohy A, Almutairi LS, Alhammadi SS, et al. Biodiversity of N-acyl homoserine lactonase (aiiA) gene from Bacillus subtilis. Microb Pathogenesis. 2022;166; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105543.

  14. Kumar P, Patel SKS, Lee JK, Kalia VC. Extending the limits of Bacillus for novel biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(8):1543–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.08.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stone E, Campbell K, Grant I, McAuliffe O. Understanding and Exploiting Phage-Host Interactions. Viruses-Basel. 2019;11(6); https://doi.org/10.3390/v11060567.

  16. Oechslin F, Zhu XJ, Dion MB, Shi R, Moineau S. Phage endolysins are adapted to specific hosts and are evolutionarily dynamic. Plos Biology. 2022;20(8); https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001740.

  17. Dion MB, Oechslin F, Moineau S. Phage diversity, genomics and phylogeny. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(3):125–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0311-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koskella B, Taylor TB. Multifaceted Impacts of Bacteriophages in the Plant Microbiome. Annual Rev Phytopathol. 2018;56:361–80 (Leach JE, Lindow SE, editors).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zuppi M, Hendrickson HL, O'Sullivan JM, Vatanen T. Phages in the Gut Ecosystem. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;11; https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.822562.

  20. Tuttle MJ, Buchan A. Lysogeny in the oceans: Lessons from cultivated model systems and a reanalysis of its prevalence. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22(12):4919–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cazares D, Cazares A, Figueroa W, Guarneros G, Edwards RA, Vinuesa P. A Novel Group of Promiscuous Podophages Infecting Diverse Gammaproteobacteria from River Communities Exhibits Dynamic Intergenus Host Adaptation. Msystems. 2021;6(1); https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00773-20.

  22. Wu HQ, Wan SC, Ruan CJ, Niu XY, Chen GW, Liu Y, et al. Phage-bacterium interactions and nutrient availability can shape C and N retention in microbial biomass. Eur J Soil Sci. 2022;73(4); https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13296.

  23. Casjens S. Prophages and bacterial genomics: what have we learned so far? Mol Microbiol. 2003;49(2):277–300. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03580.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nadeem A, Wahl LM. Prophage as a genetic reservoir: Promoting diversity and driving innovation in the host community. Evolution. 2017;71(8):2080–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kropinski AM, Turner D, Nash JHE, Ackermann HW, Lingohr EJ, Warren RA, et al. The Sequence of Two Bacteriophages with Hypermodified Bases Reveals Novel Phage-Host Interactions. Viruses-Basel. 2018;10(5); https://doi.org/10.3390/v10050217.

  26. Bhambhani A, Iadicicco I, Lee J, Ahmed S, Belfatto M, Held D, et al. Bacteriophage SP01 Gene Product 56 Inhibits Bacillus subtilis Cell Division by Interacting with FtsL and Disrupting Pbp2B and FtsW Recruitment. J Bacteriol. 2020;203(2):e00463-e520. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00463-20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rohmer C, Wolz C. The Role of hlb-Converting Bacteriophages in Staphylococcus aureus Host Adaption. Microbial Physiol. 2021;31(2):109–22. https://doi.org/10.1159/000516645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Diene SM, Corvaglia AR, Francois P, van der Mee-Marquet N, Regional Infection Control Grp C. Prophages and adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus ST398 to the human clinic. Bmc Genomics. 2017;18; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3516-x.

  29. Qumar S, Majid M, Kumar N, Tiwari SK, Semmler T, Devi S, et al. Genome Dynamics and Molecular Infection Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistant Helicobacter pullorum Isolates Obtained from Broiler and Free-Range Chickens in India. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2017;83(1); https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02305-16.

  30. Castillo D, Kauffman K, Hussain F, Kalatzis P, Rorbo N, Polz MF, et al. Widespread distribution of prophage-encoded virulence factors in marine Vibrio communities. Scientific Reports. 2018;8; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28326-9.

  31. Helgason E, Okstad OA, Caugant DA, Johansen HA, Fouet A, Mock M, et al. Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thuringiensis–one species on the basis of genetic evidence. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(6):2627–30. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.66.6.2627-2630.2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Tzipilevich E, Habusha M, Ben-Yehuda S. Acquisition of phage sensitivity by bacteria through exchange of phage receptors. Cell. 2017;168(1–2):186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stokar-Avihail A, Tal N, Erez Z, Lopatina A, Sorek R. Widespread utilization of peptide communication in phages infecting soil and pathogenic bacteria. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25(5):746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2019.03.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Li XX, Zhang C, Wei FC, Yu F, Zhao Z. Bactericidal activity of a holin-endolysin system derived from Vibrio alginolyticus phage HH109. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2021;159; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105135.

  35. Chang Y. Bacteriophage-derived endolysins applied as potent biocontrol agents to enhance food safety. Microorganisms. 2020;8(5); https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050724.

  36. Besemer J, Borodovsky M. GeneMark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Web Server issue):W451-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Moraru C, Varsani A, Kropinski AM. VIRIDIC-A novel tool to calculate the intergenomic similarities of prokaryote-infecting viruses. Viruses-Basel. 2020;12(11); https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111268.

  38. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004;14(7):1394–403. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2289704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271818); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0200807-3); the Liaoning Province Rural Science and Technology Special Action Project (2022–09), and Shenyang Science and Technology Project (22–319-2–13).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110866, China

    Yating Zhang & Ning Zhang

  2. College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110866, China

    Jianjia Miao, Xiaoyu Wang, Owusu Ansah Richard & Bingxue Li

  3. Food Science College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110866, China

    Zijing Li

Authors
  1. Yating Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianjia Miao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ning Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zijing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Owusu Ansah Richard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bingxue Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BL and NZ conceived the idea, designed the study. YZ, JM and XW collected and analyzed the data. YZ and JM was involved in manuscript editing and data interpretation. BL, NZ, OAR and ZL revised and edited the text. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ning Zhang or Bingxue Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The number of predicted prophages in 178 Bacillus strains.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

A portion of functional proteins carried by Bacillus phage.

Additional file 3: Table S3.

The information of the 36 Bacillus prophages and their host.

Additional file 4: Table S4.

The information of the 20 lytic phages.

Additional file 5: Table S5.

The homologous sequences of Bacillus lytic phages Carmel_SA, Cherry and Fah were searched in NCBI.

Additional file 6: Table S6.

Description of homologous sequences of the type I lysis module.

Additional file 7: Table S7.

Description of homologous sequences of the type II lysis module.

Additional file 8: Table S8.

The blast result of some several functionally annotated gene sequences from NCBI.

Additional file 9: Table S9.

The information of  236 Bacillus lytic pahge.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Miao, J., Zhang, N. et al. The analysis of the function, diversity, and evolution of the Bacillus phage genome. BMC Microbiol 23, 170 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02907-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02907-9

Keyword

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us